Improving the use of intravenous antihypertensive medications in the hospital setting: a quality improvement initiative for patient safety.

Intravenous (IV) hydralazine, enalapril and labetalol are oftentimes used without indication for the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension in the hospital setting and have been shown to have substantial adverse effects that are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as longer length of stay. Their use is also associated with greater monetary costs. In this project, we studied the frequency of use and consequences of these medications before and after a series of education cycles which clarified when and when not to use intravenous antihypertensives (IVAHs). Our initial aim was to decrease the unindicated use of IVAH by at least 25% in the setting of asymptomatic hypertension in our community hospital within a 1-year period after introducing education on the topic. Multidisciplinary involvement throughout three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles yielded favourable results. We focused on education towards a hospital-wide knowledge gap stemming from a lack of guidelines regarding the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension, as well as the guideline indications for IVAH. After three cycles of education targeting different groups, the unindicated use of IVAH fell by a total of 66%, decreasing patient exposure by approximately 248 cases over the total course of the study and ultimately, yielding a 52% increase in patient safety. Secondary outcome included a reduction in cost. It was noted that IV drugs cost more than their oral counterparts. The culture change in switching away from IVAH unless otherwise indicated was driven by repetitive education and group discussion to close the gap created by a lack of guidelines.

Committee Opinion No. 692 Summary: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both can occur during the prenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum periods. Pregnant women or women in the postpartum period with acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both require urgent antihypertensive therapy. Introducing standardized, evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes. Individuals and institutions should have mechanisms in place to initiate the prompt administration of medication when a patient presents with a hypertensive emergency. Treatment with first-line agents should be expeditious and occur as soon as possible within 30-60 minutes of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk of maternal stroke. Intravenous labetalol and hydralazine have long been considered first-line medications for the management of acute-onset, severe hypertension in pregnant women and women in the postpartum period. Although relatively less information currently exists for the use of calcium channel blockers for this clinical indication, the available evidence suggests that immediate release oral nifedipine also may be considered as a first-line therapy, particularly when intravenous access is not available. In the rare circumstance that intravenous bolus labetalol, hydralazine, or immediate release oral nifedipine fails to relieve acute-onset, severe hypertension and is given in successive appropriate doses, emergent consultation with an anesthesiologist, maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist, or critical care subspecialist to discuss second-line intervention is recommended.

Committee Opinion No. 692: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both can occur during the prenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum periods. Pregnant women or women in the postpartum period with acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both require urgent antihypertensive therapy. Introducing standardized, evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes. Individuals and institutions should have mechanisms in place to initiate the prompt administration of medication when a patient presents with a hypertensive emergency. Treatment with first-line agents should be expeditious and occur as soon as possible within 30-60 minutes of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk of maternal stroke. Intravenous labetalol and hydralazine have long been considered first-line medications for the management of acute-onset, severe hypertension in pregnant women and women in the postpartum period. Although relatively less information currently exists for the use of calcium channel blockers for this clinical indication, the available evidence suggests that immediate release oral nifedipine also may be considered as a first-line therapy, particularly when intravenous access is not available. In the rare circumstance that intravenous bolus labetalol, hydralazine, or immediate release oral nifedipine fails to relieve acute-onset, severe hypertension and is given in successive appropriate doses, emergent consultation with an anesthesiologist, maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist, or critical care subspecialist to discuss second-line intervention is recommended.

Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for severe hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral nifedipine is recommended along with labetalol and hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy by most authorities. Although nifedipine is cheap and easily administered, the usage pattern among health care providers suggests a strong preference for labetalol despite lack of evidence for the same. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of oral nifedipine for treatment of severe hypertension of pregnancy compared with intravenous labetalol. SEARCH STRATEGY: We systematically searched for articles comparing oral nifedipine with intravenous labetalol for the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy in any language, over Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and Google Scholar from inception till February 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all RCTs that compared intravenous labetalol with oral nifedipine for treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy, addressing relevant efficacy and safety outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard form. We used Cochrane review manager software for quantitative analysis. Data were analysed using a fixed effect model. MAIN RESULTS: The pooled analysis of seven trials (four from developing countries) consisting of 363 woman-infant pairs showed that oral nifedipine was associated with less risk of persistent hypertension (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96) and reported maternal side effects (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.94). However, on sensitivity analysis the outcome 'persistent hypertension' was no longer significant. Other outcomes did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Oral nifedipine is as efficacious and safe as intravenous labetalol and may have an edge in low resource settings. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Although studies to date are few in number and small, nifedipine shows promise for severe hypertension in pregnancy.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of matrix type transdermal therapeutic system of labetalol hydrochloride.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the investigation was to develop and evaluate matrix type transdermal therapeutic systems containing new polymeric combinations (Eudragit E PO/Eudragit RL 100 & Plasdone S 630) as polymers and Labetalol Hydrochloride (LBHCl) as a model drug. EXPERIMENTAL: The matrix type TTS of LBHCl were prepared by film casting technique. The patches were characterized for physical, in vitro release studies & ex-vivo permeation studies (human cadaver skin). On the basis of in vitro drug release and skin permeation performance, formulation A1 was found to be better than the other formulations and it was selected as the optimized formulation. The optimized patch was assessed for its pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, skin irritation potential, and stability studies. RESULTS: The maximum percentage drug release & Permeation in 48 hrs were 92.43 % and 76.24 % respectively for optimized patch. The Korsmeyer peppas release exponent value of 0.604 suggested release mechanism towards first order release in the optimized formulation. The results obtained from the in vivo characterization of the optimized patch showed sustained action of the developed formulation. The interaction studies analysis indicated no chemical interaction between the drug and polymers. The optimized patch was seemingly free of potentially hazardous skin irritation as suggested by skin irritation score of 0.915<2.00 (under Draize score test). The optimized formulation was found to be stable at ambient storage conditions. CONCLUSION: The above TTS holds promise for improved bioavailability and better management of hypertension on long term basis.

Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function in response to labetalol for control of postoperative hypertension.

Although labetalol (LAB), the combination of an alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking agent, is thought to be effective and safe for the control of postoperative hypertension, no study has focused on changes in left ventricular (LV) function when this drug was used to control postoperative hypertension. Therefore, this study determined the effects of LAB on hemodynamics and LV function assessed by 2D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 17 patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery who experienced a postoperative hypertensive episode. Postoperatively, patients were transferred while still intubated and under fentanyl sedation to the postanesthesia care unit where a TEE probe was inserted to provide a short-axis view of the LV. When their systolic blood pressure increased above 165 mmHg for more than 4 minutes, LAB was given in a dose of 0.75 mg/kg IV, over 2 minutes. If the blood pressure was not lowered to within 10% of the preoperative values, additional doses of LAB were given. Control of hypertension was obtained in all patients and was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate (90 +/- 19 to 70 + 13 bpm), cardiac index (4.52 +/- 1.65 to 3.36 +/- 1.55 L/min/m2), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (73 +/- 10 to 63 +/- 10%). With the lower blood pressure, end-diastolic area increased, indicating myocardial depression. In conclusion, LAB can be used to effectively control hypertension during the early postoperative period after abdominal aortic surgery. However, the reduction of blood pressure is achieved principally by the negative inotropic effect of LAB, which predominates over its vasodilator action.

[Randomized, comparative study on the treatment of moderate arterial hypertension during pregnancy: methyldopa, acebutolol, labetalol]. / Essai ouvert, comparatif, avec tirage au sort pour le traitement de l'HTA gravidique modérée: méthyldopa, acébutolol, labétalol.

The aim of this prospective, monocentric, opened study and with random order for antihypertensive sequence was to compare a betablocker with sympathomimetic activity (ACE) and an alphabetablocker (LAB) to the gold standard treatment (MD) in moderate HDP (BP greater than 90 mmHg). This study (January 1984 to December 1985) includes 63 women, mean age 28.2 years, divided into three comparable subgroups (age, parity, risk factors and initial level of SBP/DBP). Initial doses are 500 mg/bid (MD), and 400 mg/bid (ACE, LAB) and optimal dosages could not be respectively more than 1500 mg/bid (MD) or 1200 mg/bid (ACE, LAB). Usual criteria for maternal and foetal care are taken into account. The chi 2 test, the Student "t" test and the Kruskall Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. The results show: 1--A similar antihypertensive effect for MD and LAB, but significantly less for ACE (initial PAD-37th week PAD: MD +/- 18.8 +/- 2; LAB = -17.9 +/- 3; ACE = - 8.2 +/- 2.7 mmHg, p less than 0.02; 2--A more frequent adjustment of daily dosage with MD (n = 15) than with ACE (n = 10) or LAB (n = 7); 3--The absence of any significant difference for uricemia level, platelet counts, foetal cardiac rythm, and occurrence of pre-eclampsia (MD = 4; ACE = 3; LAB = 4; 4--An equivalent birth-weight (MD = 3110 +/- 628 g; ACE = 3115 +/- 645.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)