Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(9): e24163, 2021 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33655909

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: No national epidemiological investigations have been conducted recently regarding facial lacerations. The study was performed using the data of 3,634,229 people during the 5-year period from 2014 to 2018 archived by the National Health Information Database (NHID) of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Preschool and children under 10 years old accounted for about one-third of patients. Facial lacerations were concentrated in the "T-shaped" area, which comprised forehead, nose, lips, and the perioral area. The male to female ratio for all study subjects was 2.16:1. Age and gender are significantly related with each other (P < .001). Mean hospital stays decreased, and numbers of outpatient department visits per patient were highest for hospitals and lowest for health agencies. Over the study period, hospital costs per patient in tertiary and general hospitals increased gradually. Preschool and school-aged children are vulnerable to trauma. Male patients outnumbered female patients by a factor of more than 2. The "T-shaped'" area around forehead is vulnerable to injury. Total cost of medical care benefits per patient in tertiary hospitals was about 7 times on average than in health agencies. Regarding functional, behavioral, and aesthetic outcomes, more attention should be paid to epidemiologic data and hospital costs for facial lacerations.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/epidemiologia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Traumatismos Faciais/economia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lacerações/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMJ Open ; 7(6): e015463, 2017 06 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28606903

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric care is a high-risk area in healthcare delivery, so it is essential to have up-to-date quantitative evidence in this area to inform policy decisions regarding these services. In light of this, the objective of this study is to investigate the incidence and economic burden of third and fourth-degree lacerations in the English National Health Service (NHS) using recent national data. METHODS: We used coded inpatient data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for the financial years from 2010/2011 to 2013/2014 for all females that gave birth during that period in the English NHS. Using HES, we used pre-existing safety indicator algorithms to calculate the incidence of third and fourth-degree obstetric tears and employed a propensity score matching method to estimate the excess length of stay and economic burden associated with these events. RESULTS: Observed rates per 1000 inpatient episodes in 2010/2011 and 2013/2014, respectively: Patient Safety Indicator-trauma during vaginal delivery with instrument (PSI 18)=84.16 and 91.24; trauma during vaginal delivery without instrument (PSI 19)=29.78 and 33.43; trauma during caesarean delivery (PSI 20)=3.61 and 4.56. Estimated overall (all PSIs) economic burden for 2010/2011=£10.7 million and for 2013/2014=£14.5 million, expressed in 2013/2014 prices. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many initiatives targeting the quality of maternity care in the NHS, the incidence of third and fourth-degree lacerations has increased during the observed period which signals that quality improvement efforts in obstetric care may not be reducing incidence rates. Our conservative estimates of the financial burden of these events appear low relative to total NHS expenditure for these years.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/lesões , Custos e Análise de Custo , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Períneo/lesões , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lacerações/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/economia , Gravidez , Pontuação de Propensão , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
3.
Hand (N Y) ; 12(4): 342-347, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although fingertip injuries are common, there is limited literature on the epidemiology and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in children. This descriptive study reports the clinical features of and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in a large pediatric population treated at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Our hospital database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Revision 9 (ICD-9) codes, and medical records were reviewed. Frequency statistics were generated for 1807 patients with fingertip injuries who presented to the emergency department (ED) at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) between 2005 and 2011. Billing records were analyzed for financial data. RESULTS: A total of 1807 patients were identified for this study; 59% were male, and the mean age at time of injury was 8 years. Most commonly, injuries occurred when a finger was crushed (n = 831, 46%) in a door or window. Average length of stay in the ED was 3 hours 45 minutes, 25% of cases needed surgery, and, on average, patients had more than 1 follow-up appointment. About one-third of patients were referred from outside institutions. The average ED charge for fingertip injuries was $1195 in 2014, which would amount to about $320 430 each year (in 2014 dollars) for fingertip injuries presenting to BCH. CONCLUSION: Fingertip injuries in children are common and result in significant burden, yet are mostly preventable. Most injuries occur at home in a door or window. Although these patients generally heal well, fingertip injuries pose a health, time, and financial burden. Increased awareness and education may help to avoid these injuries.


Assuntos
Traumatismos dos Dedos/economia , Traumatismos dos Dedos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Amputação Traumática/economia , Amputação Traumática/epidemiologia , Amputação Traumática/cirurgia , Boston/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lesões por Esmagamento/economia , Lesões por Esmagamento/epidemiologia , Lesões por Esmagamento/cirurgia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Traumatismos dos Dedos/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/economia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Lacerações/economia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Lacerações/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Unhas/lesões , Unhas/cirurgia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo
4.
West J Emerg Med ; 16(4): 527-34, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265964

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Limited data are available regarding differences in presentation and management of pediatric emergency department (PED) patients based on insurance status. The objective of the study was to assess the difference in management of pediatric facial lacerations based on medical insurance status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with universal sampling of patients with facial lacerations who were treated in an urban PED (45K visits/year) over a one-year period. Demographic features and injury characteristics for patients with commercial (private) insurance and those with Medicaid or Medicare (public) insurance were compared. RESULTS: Of 1235 children included in the study, 667 (54%) had private insurance and 485 (39%) had public insurance. The two groups did not differ in age or gender, arrival by ambulance, location of injury occurrence, mechanism of injury, part of face involved, length or depth of laceration, use of local anesthetic, or method of repair but differed in acuity assigned at triage. Patients with public insurance were found less likely to have subspecialty consultation in bivariable (OR=0.41, 95% CI [0.24-0.68]) and multivariable logistic regression analyses (OR=0.45, 95% CI [0.25-0.78]). Patients with public insurance received procedural sedation significantly less often than those with private insurance (OR=0.48, 95% CI [0.29-0.76]). This difference was not substantiated in multivariable models (OR=0.74, 95% CI [0.40-1.31]). CONCLUSION: Patients with public insurance received less subspecialty consultation compared to privately insured patients despite a similarity in the presentation and characteristics of their facial lacerations. The reasons for these disparities require further investigation.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/classificação , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Lacerações/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 29(10): 1066-9, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24076608

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of laceration length estimation in a pediatric emergency department among health care providers of varying levels of training and its impact on billing practices. METHODS: This study involves a prospective case series. Children younger than 21 years with lacerations evaluated and repaired in the pediatric emergency department between January 1 and April 30, 2012, were eligible for enrollment. Each laceration was evaluated by a trainee/midlevel provider (frontline provider) and by an attending physician; each one offered an estimated laceration length. The true measurement was then documented by 1 of 6 pediatric emergency medicine fellows on shift. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The mean error of estimation (the absolute differences between the estimated and the true laceration length) of attending physicians and frontline providers were determined and compared. The proportions of lacerations whose estimated length was in a different billing category were compared using χ(2). Cost analysis was documented. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients were enrolled. The mean age was 5.9 years. A total of 119 patients (62.6%) were male, and 134 lacerations (70.5%) were located on the face. Most repairs were simple (79%). There was no difference between the estimated and measured length among attendings and frontline providers (P = 0.583). An average of 8.2% of lacerations were misclassified and billed incorrectly with 20% (4/20) of facial lacerations up-coded. The mean overcharge was $12.04. Of 11 lacerations elsewhere on the body, 3 (27%) were down-coded, with an average difference of $6.97 for simple and $38.51 for layered repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric emergency medicine practitioners are accurate estimators of laceration length. Eight percent of lacerations are misclassified and billed incorrectly. Physicians should be required to report measured lengths for billing.


Assuntos
Current Procedural Terminology , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Lacerações/patologia , Adolescente , Antropometria , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Traumatismos Faciais/classificação , Traumatismos Faciais/economia , Traumatismos Faciais/patologia , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Lactente , Internato e Residência , Lacerações/classificação , Lacerações/economia , Masculino , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/economia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/psicologia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/economia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/psicologia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Assistentes Médicos/economia , Assistentes Médicos/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/economia , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Inj Violence Res ; 5(1): 11-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21964162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fireworks are commonly used in local and national celebrations. The aim of this study is to explore the extent, nature and hospital costs of injuries related to the Persian Wednesday Eve festival in Iran. METHODS: Data for injuries caused by fireworks during the 2009 Persian Wednesday Eve festival were collected from the national Ministry of Health database. Injuries were divided into nine groups and the average and total hospital costs were estimated for each group. The cost of care for patients with burns was estimated by reviewing a sample of 100 patients randomly selected from a large burn center in Tehran. Other costs were estimated by conducting semi structured interviews with expert managers at two large government hospitals. RESULTS: 1817 people were injured by fireworks during the 2009 Wednesday Eve festival. The most frequently injured sites were the hand (43.3%), eye (24.5%) and face (13.2%), and the most common types of injury were burns (39.9%), contusions/abrasions (24.6%) and lacerations (12.7%). The mean length of hospital stay was 8.15 days for patients with burns, 10.7 days for those with amputations, and 3 days for those with other types of injury. The total hospital cost of injuries was US$ 284 000 and the average cost per injury was US$ 156. The total hospital cost of patients with amputations was US$ 48 598. Most of the costs were related to burns (56.6%) followed by amputations (12.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Injuries related to the Persian Wednesday Eve festival are common and lead to extensive morbidity and medical costs. © 2013 KUMS, All rights reserved.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões , Queimaduras , Explosões , Incêndios , Férias e Feriados/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica/economia , Amputação Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos por Explosões/economia , Traumatismos por Explosões/epidemiologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/etiologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/terapia , Queimaduras/economia , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/etiologia , Queimaduras/terapia , Criança , Contusões/economia , Contusões/epidemiologia , Contusões/etiologia , Contusões/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Explosões/prevenção & controle , Explosões/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Incêndios/prevenção & controle , Incêndios/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Lacerações/economia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Lacerações/etiologia , Lacerações/terapia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino
7.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 30(5): 470-5, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20604649

RESUMO

This study, initially presented at the SMFM Annual Conference in San Diego on 29 January 2009, sought to explore the risk factors for mortality from postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). A total of 138,316 cases of PPH from 1991 to 2000 were identified using the California Health Discharge Database. Data analysed included demographic information and clinical risk factors. PPH increased from 1.9% to 2.8%, while mortality rate decreased during the study period (1991-2000). Logistic regression showed that hysterectomy, hypertensive disorders, abruption, transverse caesarean delivery, and classical caesarean delivery, increased risk for PPH mortality, while manual placental extraction, episiotomy, and laceration repairs decreased risk. Two geographical regions, Inland Empire and Orange County, were associated with increased PPH mortality, despite having lower incidence of PPH. Teaching status and investor ownership of hospitals increased the risk of PPH mortality. There was no associated change in mortality based on hospital quality rating.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/economia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/mortalidade , California/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Episiotomia/economia , Episiotomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lacerações/economia , Lacerações/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Períneo/lesões , Placenta Retida/economia , Placenta Retida/mortalidade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
8.
Ann Emerg Med ; 53(2): 189-97, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18440668

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We investigate the cost difference between conventional suture and tissue adhesive methods in simple wound closure. METHODS: A cost-consequence analysis was conducted alongside a nonblinded randomized controlled trial comparing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive with conventional suture in simple lacerations closure in emergency departments (EDs) of a university teaching hospital and a major regional hospital in Hong Kong. One hundred eighty-six adult patients with simple lacerations of length within 8 cm were randomized to receive tissue adhesive (93 patients) or conventional suture (93 patients) for wound closure. The primary outcome measures were the costs to the Hospital Authority and the charges on participants incurred in each treatment method. The secondary outcome measures included the cosmetic visual analog scale, visual analog scale, Wound Evaluation Score, total time spent in each closure method, and the overall patients' satisfaction on the whole process of wound management. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. The tissue adhesive method incurred a higher cost to the Hospital Authority (216.12 [US $27.70] versus 171.33 [US $21.96]; absolute difference 44.79 [US $5.74] [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.76 to 55.95 [US $4.20 to 7.14]]) but a lower charge to patients (109.68 [US $14.06] versus 156.96 [US $20.12]; absolute difference 47.28 [US $6.06] [95% CI, 35.58 to 58.98 [US $4.56 to 7.56]) than the conventional suture method. The mean cosmetic visual analog scale score, visual analog scale score, and Wound Evaluation Score of the 2 groups were similar at various intervals within 3 months after wound closure. Compared with the suture group, the tissue adhesive group had a shorter median procedure time, fewer patients had wound erythema or swelling after wound closure, fewer patients required analgesics on discharge at ED, and there was a higher overall patient satisfaction score. CONCLUSION: Simple wounds closed by tissue adhesives incur a higher cost to the Hospital Authority than the conventional suture but may be favored by patients because of lower personal charge.


Assuntos
Cianoacrilatos/economia , Lacerações/cirurgia , Suturas/economia , Adesivos Teciduais/economia , Adulto , Comorbidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Lacerações/economia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Adulto Jovem
9.
Przegl Lek ; 65(1): 43-6, 2008.
Artigo em Polonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18669109

RESUMO

The investigation was carried out on 1199 patients treated for hand injuries in the II Department of Surgery of the Jagiellonian University between years 1987-2000. There were 225 patients injured while working with circular saw. These injuries were much more severe than others (p < 0.001) and patients with these injuries were more often (p < 0.001) admitted to the clinic. The length of total treatment was considerably longer (p < 0.001) and final results--worse than in other patients (p < 0.001)--permanent hand disability was almost three times larger. Disability pension was given to these patients much more frequently than to others (p < 0.001). The main reason of these injuries seems to be the common use of home-made circular saws without any protection devices and non-conformity to fundamental rules of work security. Patients with extensive multitissular hand injuries should be treated in specialistic centers of hand surgery, where the final results can be improved and the total costs of treatment considerably reduced.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Mão/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Mão/cirurgia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Lacerações/cirurgia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trabalho/economia , Acidentes de Trabalho/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Traumatismos da Mão/economia , Traumatismos da Mão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Lacerações/economia , Lacerações/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/economia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Polônia/epidemiologia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/economia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 12(2): 164-73, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16579825

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The surgical management and outcome of outpatient care for patients with simple lacerations were compared across three institutions. We examined the variations in wound infection rate, total charge and medical resource use in terms of prophylactic antibiotic prescription, frequency of outpatient visits and required days for stitch removal. DESIGN: Retrospective and consecutive chart review. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving treatment for simple lacerations in the outpatient departments of three institutions in Japan between June 2000 and August 2001. OUTCOME MEASURES AND METHOD: The basic patient characteristics, treatment method for the laceration and incidence of wound infection were collected. Variations in the wound infection rate were examined across the institutions. We then examined the variations in the medical resource use and total charge for patients without wound infection among the institutions by multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 479 patients were reviewed. The proportion of patients with blunt injury, patients with simple lacerations to the head or face, and those with underlying medical disease were significantly different among the three institutions. The wound infection rate did not significantly differ (1.9% in Institution A, 1.3% in B, 3.0% in C, P = 0.555). The medical resource use for patients without wound infection was significantly different and small in Institution A. CONCLUSION: We identified variations in the resource use for completing wound care among three institutions, whereas the wound infection rate revealed no significant difference among the institutions. There existed some room for improvement in the productive efficiency of simple laceration treatment.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Lacerações/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Lacerações/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecção dos Ferimentos/economia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA