Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Neratinib plus capecitabine (Ner+Cap) were proved to be clinically beneficial as a third-line treatment for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Ner+Cap from the Chinese healthcare perspective. DESIGN: A three-state Markov simulation model was performed based on the results of NALA trial. The utilities of health state and disutilities of adverse events were derived from the published literature. Direct costs of anticancer agents, drug administration, routine follow-up and serious adverse events management were calculated in the model. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate and probability sensitivity analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with confirmed HER2-positive MBC who previously received at least two HER2-targeted treatments and were aged ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. A total of 621 patients were enrolled in the NALA trial. INTERVENTIONS: Third-line treatment with Ner+Cap or lapatinib plus capecitabine (Lap+Cap). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary health outcomes of the model were costs, expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: When compared with Lap+Cap, Ner+Cap provided an additional 0.431 LYs and 0.339 QALYs, and increased the cost by $4299.2. The corresponding ICERs were 9970.1/LY and $12 670.2/QALY. Univariate sensitivity analyses suggested that the results were generally robust. Besides, Ner+Cap had a 100% probability of being cost-effective according to probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ner+Cap was likely to be a cost-effective regimen as the third-line therapy for women with HER2-positive MBC at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37 653.0/QALY in China.

Assessment of the Immune Response to Tumor Cell Apoptosis and Efferocytosis.

Apoptotic cells are cleared from the body principally through recognition and engulfment by neighboring phagocytes, a process known as efferocytosis. During efferocytosis, phagocytes are recruited to the site/activated by "find me" signals released from apoptotic cells, precisely identify apoptotic cells by the recognition of "eat me" signals on the apoptotic cell surface, and engulf the apoptotic cells to prevent secondary necrosis and inflammation. Thus, efferocytosis is critical for tissue homeostasis in normal physiology. However, efferocytosis of apoptotic tumor cells-performed by tumor-associated macrophages-suppresses immunity within the tumor microenvironment and limits the antitumor response. This phenomenon is further exacerbated in tumor residual disease because of the high apoptotic cell burden generated by cytotoxic therapies. Blocking efferocytosis could be a powerful approach to boost tumor immunogenicity, particularly as a combination approach with cytotoxic therapies that produce many apoptotic cells, but little is currently known about the immune response to efferocytosis. Moreover, there is a dearth of in vivo models available to study the immunologic and therapeutic consequences of blocking efferocytosis in tumor residual disease.Here, we describe a model that enables in vivo studies of tumor immunology in the aftermath of cytotoxic therapy with an emphasis on the impact of efferocytosis. Orthotopic HER2+ mammary tumors are established in immune-competent mice, followed by a single administration of lapatinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2, to the mice that induces widespread, transient apoptosis in the tumor microenvironment. In the days following lapatinib treatment, agents that block efferocytosis such as BMS-777607 are administered. Tissue is collected from cohorts of mice at day 2 (after lapatinib treatment only) to assess apoptosis, day 8 (after lapatinib treatment followed by blockade of efferocytosis) to assess the immune response to apoptosis and efferocytosis, and day 28 (after 4 consecutive weeks of treatment) to assess therapeutic efficacy. This model enables mechanistic studies of tumor immunology in residual disease as well as therapeutic efficacy studies of targeted agents that disrupt efferocytosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pyrotinib Plus Capecitabine versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in China: A Scenario Analysis of Health Insurance Coverage.

BACKGROUND: The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene is present in 20~25% of breast cancer (BC) patients, contributing to an inferior prognosis. Recent clinical trials showed that pyrotinib has promising antitumor activities and acceptable tolerability for those patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03080805 and NCT02422199). Therefore, this study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC after prior trastuzumab. METHODS: A lifetime-partitioned survival model was established to evaluate health and economic outcomes with different treatment strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert opinions, and other local charges. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Scenario analyses were developed to make further evaluations. RESULTS: The pyrotinib regimen had significant advantages over the lapatinib regimen after enrolling in the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), with cost savings of USD 15,599.27 and a gain of 0.53 QALYs. Meanwhile, before enrolling in NRDL, the pyrotinib regimen afforded the same QALYs at a higher incremental cost of USD 45,400.64 versus the lapatinib regimen, producing an ICER of USD 85,944.79 per QALY. Scenario analyses yielded similar results. Sensitivity analyses suggested stability in the cost-effectiveness findings. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to lapatinib plus capecitabine, the pyrotinib plus capecitabine enrolled in NRDL is a cost-effective alternative second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC in China.

Lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con expresión HER-2 que progresaron a una primera línea con trastuzumab y quimioterapia / Lapatinib associated with chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer with HER-2 expression that progressed to a first line with trastuzumab and chemotherapy

ANTECEDENTES: Como parte de las funciones de UFETS: "Evaluar las tecnologías sanitarias ya existentes en la entidad, y proponer estrategias para su uso eficiente y/o reposición", se ha elaborado el presente informe sobre el uso de Lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia más allá de la 1era línea de tratamiento con trastuzumab asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico con HER-2 sobre expresado o amplificado. ESTRATEGIA DE BÚSQUEDA DE INFORMACIÓN: a) ¿En los pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama avanzado con expresión HER2 que progresaron a una primera línea de tratamiento con trastuzumab y quimioterapia, cuál es la eficacia y seguridad de lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia? b) Recolección de Manuscritos a Revisar: La estrategia de búsqueda sistemática de información científica para el desarrollo del presente informe se realizó siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Pirámide jerárquica de la evidencia propuesta por Haynes y se consideró los siguientes estudios: Sumarios y guías de práctica clínica. Revisiones sistemáticas y/o meta-análisis. Ensayos Controlados Aleatorizados (ECA). Estudios Observacionales (cohortes, caso y control, descriptivos). INFORMACIÓN QUE SOPORTE LA RELEVANCIA PARA LA SALUD PÚBLICA: Según el reporte de Globocan, el cáncer de mama es la neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada durante el 2020 a nivel mundial. En nuestro país, los registros publicados por el INEN sobre los casos nuevos diagnosticados en ambos sexos, durante el periodo 2009-2018, registran al cáncer de mama como la segunda neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada, con 1373 casos nuevos durante el 2018. Según Globocan, el cáncer de mama es la segunda neoplasia más frecuentemente diagnosticada durante el 2020, representando el 9.6% del total de diagnósticos nuevos realizados. Durante la última década, diversos estudios han evaluado agentes que potencialmente puedan impactar positivamente en la evolución de las pacientes con cáncer de mama. El HER-2 es una proteína transmembrana celular, cuya activación desencadena una cascada molecular promoviendo la disminución de la apoptosis, aumento de la proliferación celular, angiogénesis y desarrollo del microambiente tumoral.4 El conocimiento de la vía del HER-2 en el desarrollo del cáncer de mama llevo al desarrollo de agentes que bloqueen esta proteína. Uno de los primeros agentes desarrollados fue el trastuzumab. El trastuzumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la proteína HER-2, su eficacia y seguridad han sido evaluados en primera línea de tratamiento en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con sobreexpresión o amplificación del HER-2, mejorando la sobrevida global (SG) y la sobrevida libe de progresión (SLP). Actualmente, nuevos regímenes de terapia han sido estudiados. El estudio CLEOPATRA evaluó la combinación de quimioterapia, trastuzumab y pertuzumab en primera línea del cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. Pertuzumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado que se une al dominio extracelular II de HER2. Su mecanismo de acción es complementario al de trastuzumab, inhibiendo la dimerización HER2-HER3 dependiente de ligando y reduciendo la señalización a través de vías intracelulares como PI3K/AKT. Hoy en día, la asociación quimioterapia, trastuzumab y pertuzumab son la combinación de elección en primera línea de tratamiento en esta población de pacientes en la práctica clínica diária. El impacto positivo del bloqueo del HER-2 llevo al estudio de nuevos agentes de tratamiento que continúen con el bloqueo del receptor en segunda línea de manejo. Lapatinib es un inhibidor dual de la tirosina quinasa (ITK) que se dirige tanto a EGFR como a HER2, inhibe el crecimiento de células de cáncer de mama que sobreexpresan HER2 en cultivo y en xenoinjertos tumorales. Los estudios in vitro demostraron que lapatinib inhibe la activación de las tres vías de señalización descendentes MAPK, PI3KAKT y PLCg; a través de la disminución de la fosforilación de los receptores diana y las proteínas Raf, ERK, AKT y PLCγ1. El objetivo de esta evaluación sanitaria es determina la seguridad y eficacia de lapatinib asociado a quimioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 luego de la progresión a una primera línea con trastuzumab asociada a quimioterapia. DISCUSIÓN: El cáncer de mama es una de las neoplasias más frecuentemente diagnosticadas en nuestro país. Diversos estudios han evaluado agentes que potencialmente puedan impactar positivamente en la evolución de las pacientes con cáncer de mama. Lapatinib es un inhibidor dual de la tirosina quinasa (ITK) que se dirige tanto a EGFR como a HER2, inhibiendo el crecimiento de células de cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. FDA y EMA aprobaron el empleo de lapatinib en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 positivos y en la actualidad, las guías de práctica clínica nacionales e internacionales (ASCO, ESMO, NICE) sugieren el uso de lapatinib como parte del arsenal terapéutico en pacientes seleccionados con cáncer de mama avanzado con HER-2 positivo. Nuestra búsqueda sistemática realizada en pubmed encontró 535 artículos, de los cuales se identificaron 3 estudios de interés. Amir publico una revisión sistemática/metaanálisis donde reporto que el añadir lapatinib al tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de mama HER-2 positivo mejoro significativamente la SLP (HR 0.69) y la SG (HR 0.76, IC 95%, 0.60-0.96, p<0.02). Lapatinib se asoció a un incremento del 64% del OR de desarrollar un evento adverso severo (p = 0.003). Los eventos adversos más frecuentes registrados fueron diarrea, rash, artralgia y fatiga. Los estudios incluidos tuvieron un diseño similar y evaluaron los mismos objetivos. Los modelos de efectos randomizados y los análisis de sensibilidad limitaron que la heterogeneidad de las poblaciones incluidas afecte sustancialmente los resultados. Madden publico una revisión sistemática demostrando que la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina extendió la SG (37.6-108.7 semanas) y la SLP (21.1-30 semanas) en las pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzada HER-2 positivo que progresaron a una primera línea con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. La combinación lapatinib-capecitabina fue relativamente bien tolerada, presentando efectos secundarios, por lo general, de bajo grado: eritrodisestesia palmar-plantar, diarrea, erupción cutánea, anorexia y fatiga. La combinación lapatinib-capecitabina fue comparada con lapatinib-vinorelbine en un estudio fase II incluido. La mSG obtenida por lapatinib-capecitabina fue superior (105 semanas vs 84 semanas). La mSLP y la toxicidad obtenida fueron similares en ambos brazos. Esta última revisión presento limitaciones. El diseño metodológico y los sesgos presentados por los estudios incluido dentro de la revisión sistemática le dieron un nivel de calidad bajo para cada ensayo clínico. A pesar de las limitaciones descritas, la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina es un régimen eficaz y seguro en las pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. CONCLUSIONES: El cáncer de mama es una de las neoplasias más frecuentes diagnosticadas en nuestro país. El bloqueo del HER-2 impacta positivamente en la sobrevida de los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo. Lapatinib-capecitabina mejora significativamente la SLP y la SG en los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo que han progresado a una primera línea de terapia con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. Lapatinib-capecitabina es segura en los pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado HER-2 positivo que han progresado a una primera línea de terapia con trastuzumab-quimioterapia. Lapatinib-vinorelbina es segura y eficaz en el tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico HER-2 positivo previamente tratadas, aunque la evidencia de su uso es más limitada o la evidencia sugiere que es menos efectivo que la combinación lapatinib-capecitabina, puede ser una opción de terapia en pacientes selecionados.

Discovering novel cancer bio-markers in acquired lapatinib resistance using Bayesian methods.

Signalling transduction pathways (STPs) are commonly hijacked by many cancers for their growth and malignancy, but demystifying their underlying mechanisms is difficult. Here, we developed methodologies with a fully Bayesian approach in discovering novel driver bio-markers in aberrant STPs given high-throughput gene expression (GE) data. This project, namely 'PathTurbEr' (Pathway Perturbation Driver) uses the GE dataset derived from the lapatinib (an EGFR/HER dual inhibitor) sensitive and resistant samples from breast cancer cell lines (SKBR3). Differential expression analysis revealed 512 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their pathway enrichment revealed 13 highly perturbed singalling pathways in lapatinib resistance, including PI3K-AKT, Chemokine, Hippo and TGF-$\beta $ singalling pathways. Next, the aberration in TGF-$\beta $ STP was modelled as a causal Bayesian network (BN) using three MCMC sampling methods, i.e. Neighbourhood sampler (NS) and Hit-and-Run (HAR) sampler that potentially yield robust inference with lower chances of getting stuck at local optima and faster convergence compared to other state-of-art methods. Next, we examined the structural features of the optimal BN as a statistical process that generates the global structure using $p_1$-model, a special class of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs), and MCMC methods for their hyper-parameter sampling. This step enabled key drivers identification that drive the aberration within the perturbed BN structure of STP, and yielded 34, 34 and 23 perturbation driver genes out of 80 constituent genes of three perturbed STP models of TGF-$\beta $ signalling inferred by NS, HAR and MH sampling methods, respectively. Functional-relevance and disease-relevance analyses suggested their significant associations with breast cancer progression/resistance.

In vitro assessment of the photo(geno)toxicity associated with Lapatinib, a Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor.

The epidermal growth factor receptors EGFR and HER2 are the main targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The quinazoline derivative lapatinib (LAP) is used since 2007 as dual TKI in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and currently, it is used as an oral anticancer drug for the treatment of solid tumors such as breast and lung cancer. Although hepatotoxicity is its main side effect, it makes sense to investigate the ability of LAP to induce photosensitivity reactions bearing in mind that BRAF (serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf) inhibitors display a considerable phototoxic potential and that afloqualone, a quinazoline-marketed drug, causes photodermatosis. Metabolic bioactivation of LAP by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 leads to chemically reactive N-dealkylated (N-LAP) and O-dealkylated (O-LAP) derivatives. In this context, the aim of the present work is to explore whether LAP and its N- and O-dealkylated metabolites can induce photosensitivity disorders by evaluating their photo(geno)toxicity through in vitro studies, including cell viability as well as photosensitized protein and DNA damage. As a matter of fact, our work has demonstrated that not only LAP, but also its metabolite N-LAP have a clear photosensitizing potential. They are both phototoxic and photogenotoxic to cells, as revealed by the 3T3 NRU assay and the comet assay, respectively. By contrast, the O-LAP does not display relevant photobiological properties. Remarkably, the parent drug LAP shows the highest activity in membrane phototoxicity and protein oxidation, whereas N-LAP is associated with the highest photogenotoxicity, through oxidation of purine bases, as revealed by detection of 8-Oxo-dG.

Metabolic Stability Assessment of New PARP Inhibitor Talazoparib Using Validated LC-MS/MS Methodology: In silico Metabolic Vulnerability and Toxicity Studies.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib (BMN673) is a new poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has been FDA approved for patients suffering from metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations. METHOD AND RESULTS: In the current study, an accurate and efficient liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methodology was developed for TZB estimation in addition to its metabolic stability assessment. TZB and lapatinib (LAP) (which is chosen as an internal standard; IS) were separated using reversed phase elution system (Hypersil C18 column) with an isocratic mobile phase. The linearity range of the established method was 5-500 ng/mL (r2 ≥ 0.999) in the human liver microsomes (HLMs) matrix. Different parameters were calculated to confirm the method sensitivity (limit of quantification was 2.0 ng/mL), and reproducibility (intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were below 3.1%) of our methodology. For evaluation of TZB metabolic stability in HLM matrix, intrinsic clearance (9.59 µL/min/mg) and in vitro half-life (72.7 mins) were calculated. TZB treatment discontinuations were reported due to adverse events and dose accumulation, so in silico metabolic vulnerability (experimental and in silico) and toxicity assessment (in silico) of TZB were performed utilizing P450 Metabolism and DEREK modules of StarDrop software. CONCLUSION: TZB is slowly metabolized by the liver. TZB was reported to be minimally metabolized by the liver that approved our outcomes. We do recommend that plasma levels be monitored in cases when talazoparib is used for a long period of time, since it is possible for TZB to bioaccumulate after multiple doses to toxic levels. According to our knowledge, the current method is considered the first LC-MS/MS methodology for evaluating TZB metabolic stability. Further drug discovery studies can be done depending on this concept allowing the designing of new series of compounds with more safety profile through reducing side effects and improving metabolic behavior.

Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts.

Data from several large high-throughput drug response screens have become available to the scientific community recently. Although many efforts have been made to use this information to predict drug sensitivity, our ability to accurately predict drug response based on genetic data remains limited. In order to systematically examine how different aspects of modelling affect the resulting prediction accuracy, we built a range of models for seven drugs (erlotinib, pacliatxel, lapatinib, PLX4720, sorafenib, nutlin-3 and nilotinib) using data from the largest available cell line and xenograft drug sensitivity screens. We found that the drug response metric, the choice of the molecular data type and the number of training samples have a substantial impact on prediction accuracy. We also compared the tasks of drug response prediction with tissue type prediction and found that, unlike for drug response, tissue type can be predicted with high accuracy. Furthermore, we assessed our ability to predict drug response in four xenograft cohorts (treated either with erlotinib, gemcitabine or paclitaxel) using models trained on cell line data. We could predict response in an erlotinib-treated cohort with a moderate accuracy (correlation ≈ 0.5), but were unable to correctly predict responses in cohorts treated with gemcitabine or paclitaxel.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab-containing treatment sequences for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients have expanded markedly since trastuzumab approval in 1998. Several other regimens are now available, including pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, T-DM1, capecitabine plus lapatinib, and trastuzumab plus lapatinib. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of four treatment sequences for HER-2-positive mBC according to the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration (TNHIA). METHODS: Costs (U.S. Dollars) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years) of four treatment sequences for HER-2-positive mBC patients were examined using a Markov model over a lifetime horizon. Transition probabilities, disease progression, and probability of adverse events and survival were derived from clinical trial data. Costs and health utilities were estimated from TNHIA, Taipei Medical University Hospital, and the literature. Deterministic, probabilistic sensitivity analyses and a scenario analysis examined parameter uncertainty and accounted for drug wastage in dosage and cost calculations. RESULTS: Sequence 3 (1st line: trastuzumab plus docetaxel; 2nd line: T-DM1; 3rd line: trastuzumab plus lapatinib) was the most cost-effective sequence followed by sequence 1 (1st line: pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel; 2nd line: T-DM1; 3rd line: capecitabine plus lapatinib), and sequence 4 (1st line: trastuzumab plus docetaxel; 2nd line: trastuzumab plus lapatinib; 3rd line: trastuzumab plus capecitabine), respectively. The model was sensitive to costs and transition probabilities, but not particularly sensitive to the wastage assumption. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the TNHIA, trastuzumab plus docetaxel as 1st line followed by T-DM1 and trastuzumab plus lapatinib as 2nd and 3rd line represents the most cost-effective strategy among the four sequences considered for treating HER-2-positive mBC patients.

A review of the value of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies in breast cancer.

The cost of cancer drugs continues to escalate with the rapid development and approval of novel therapies, especially over the course of the last decade. In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, the survival benefits gained by new treatments have been undeniably substantial. It is important to assess the financial value of these therapies for decision making at both the societal and individual level. This information is key for managing resources in resource-limited health care systems, while at the same time supporting patient decision-making and conversations between patient and physicians on cost versus benefit. In this article, we perform a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses that have been completed to date on HER2-targeted agents, focussing on those that correlate with standard of care therapy. Our discussion also highlights potential strategies to overcome several limitations associated with measuring value for anticancer drugs.

Drogas de alto costo en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama metastásico: recomendaciones basadas en evidencia / High-cost drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: recommendations based on evidence

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las enfermedades no transmisibles (ENT) son en la actualidad la principal causa de mortalidade mundial. De los 57 millones de defunciones que se produjeron en 2008 en todo el mundo, 36 millones ­casi las dos terceras partes- se debieron a ENT, principalmente enfermidades cardiovasculares, cáncer, diabetes y enfermedades pulmonares crónicas. El cáncer, como segunda causa de estas defunciones, fue responsable de 7.6 millones de muertes - más de las dos terceras partes de las cuales ocurrieron en países de ingresos bajos y medios. En Argentina, las ENT son responsables de más del 60% del total de las defunciones que se producen anualmente en el país, 20% de las cuales corresponden a tumores. Esto representa aproximadamente 60.000 muertes por año, de las cuales más del 90% se produce en personas mayores de 44 años de edad. En el año 2012 murieron por cáncer casi 62000 hombres y mujeres en Argentina. La región Centro, al ser la más poblada, registró más del 70% de estas defunciones. El cáncer de pulmón se observa en primer lugar de importancia en todas las regiones menos en Cuyo en la que encontramos el câncer de mama. Le siguen en orden de frecuencia el cáncer colorrectal y el de mama. En mujeres, la mayor mortalidad por cáncer se debe al cáncer de mama con una TEM de 18.0 por 100000 mujeres, constituyendo la primera causa de mortalidad por cáncer para el sexo femenino. DEFINICIÓN DEL PROBLEMA: La denominación cáncer de mama avanzado incluye a la enfermedad localmente avanzada y metastásica. Progresivamente se detectan cánceres en estadíos más precoces, no obstante cerca de un 5% de ellos serán metastásicos desde el inicio. Adicionalmente cerca de un 30% de las pacientes con estadios localizados, desarrollarán metástasis en algún momento de la evolución de la enfermedad. Aproximadamente entre 10 a 30% de todos los cánceres de mama tienen amplificación génica o sobreexpresión (o ambos) del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico tipo 2 (HER2), perteneciente a una familia de receptores transmembrana. La sobreexpresión o amplificación resulta en un fenotipo tumoral más agresivo con peor pronóstico. A la vez que constituye un fator predictivo de respuesta a la terapia dirigida contra este receptor. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica de publicaciones dirigida a los idiomas inglés y español. La franja de tiempo para la búsqueda fue entre 2014 hasta 2018 inclusive. Los tipos de estudios buscados fueron ensayos clínicos randomizados, revisiones sistemáticas, metanálisis y estudios de costo- efectividad. La búsqueda se llevó a cabo en las siguientes bases: PubMed, Epistemonikos, The Cochrane library, Tripdatabase; búsquedas manuales en NICE, AHR, SIGN, SMC, HTA de NIHR, CIGNA, AETNA así como en google. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática en forma independiente por distintos membros del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. Se consultaron fuentes primarias (trabajos randomizados y controlados) y secundarias (Revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis realizados bajo una metodologia clara, evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias y estudios fármaco-económicos). Se sintetizó dicha información y se la analizó. TECNOLOGÍA: PALBOCICLIB. La ciclina D1 y las ciclinas dependendientes de quinasas (CDKs) 4 y 6 forman parte de múltiples vías de señalización que conducen a la proliferación celular. A través de la inhibición de CDKs 4/6, Palbociclib, de administración oral, reduce la proliferación celular bloqueando la progresión de las fases G1 a S del ciclo celular al inhibir la fosforilación de la proteína del retinoblastoma. CONCLUSIONES FINALES: Se llegó a acuerdo en los puntos de controvérsia planteados y se confeccionó el algoritmo terapéutico propuesto.

89Zr-mAb3481 PET for HER3 tumor status assessment during lapatinib treatment.

Treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-driven breast cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib can induce a compensatory HER3 increase, which may attenuate antitumor efficacy. Therefore, we explored in vivo HER3 tumor status assessment after lapatinib treatment with zirconium-89 (89Zr)-labeled anti-HER3 antibody mAb3481 positron emission tomography (PET). Lapatinib effects on HER3 cell surface expression and mAb3481 internalization were evaluated in human breast (BT474, SKBR3) and gastric (N87) cancer cell lines using flow cytometry. Next, in vivo effects of daily lapatinib treatment on89Zr-mAb3481 BT474 and N87 xenograft tumor uptake were studied. PET-scans (BT474 only) were made after daily lapatinib treatment for 9 days, starting 3 days prior to 89Zr-mAb3481 administration. Subsequently, ex vivo 89Zr-mAb3481 organ distribution analysis was performed and HER3 tumor levels were measured with Western blot and immunohistochemistry. In vitro, lapatinib increased membranous HER3 in BT474, SKBR3 and N87 cells, and consequently mAb3481 internalization 1.7-fold (BT474), 1.4-fold (SKBR3) and 1.4-fold (N87). 89Zr-mAb3481 BT474 tumor uptake was remarkably high at SUVmean 5.6±0.6 (51.8±7.7%ID/g) using a 10 µg 89Zr-mAb3481 protein dose in vehicle-treated mice. However, compared to vehicle, lapatinib did not affect 89Zr-mAb3481 ex vivo uptake in BT474 and N87 tumors, while HER3 tumor expression remained unchanged. In conclusion, lapatinib increased in vitro HER3 tumor cell expression, but not when these cells were xenografted. 89Zr-mAb3481 PET accurately reflected HER3 tumor status. 89Zr-mAb3481 PET showed high, HER3-specific tumor uptake, and such an approach might sensitively assess HER3 tumor heterogeneity and treatment response in patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2): positive advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The EMILIA trial demonstrated that trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) significantly increased the median profession-free and overall survival relative to combination therapy with lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. We performed an economic analysis of T-DM1 as a second-line therapy compared to LC and monotherapy with capecitabine (C) from both perspectives of the US payer and society. METHODS: We developed four possible Markov models for ABC to compare the projected life-time costs and outcomes of T-DM1, LC, and C. Model transition probabilities were estimated from the EMILIA and EGF100151 clinical trials. Direct costs of the therapies, major adverse events, laboratory tests, and disease progression, indirect costs (productivity losses due to morbidity and mortality), and health utilities were obtained from published sources. The models used 3 % discount rate and reported in 2015 US dollars. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and model averaging were used to account for model parametric and structural uncertainty. RESULTS: When incorporating both model parametric and structural uncertainty, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) comparing T-DM1 to LC and T-DM1 to C were $183,828 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $126,001/QALY from the societal perspective, respectively. From the payer's perspective, the ICERs were $220,385/QALY (T-DM1 vs. LC) and $168,355/QALY (T-DM1 vs. C). CONCLUSIONS: From both perspectives of the US payer and society, T-DM1 is not cost-effective when comparing to the LC combination therapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. T-DM1 might have a better chance to be cost-effective compared to capecitabine monotherapy from the US societal perspective.

A global economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of new treatments for advanced breast cancer in Canada.

Objective Considering the increasing number of treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), it is important to develop high-quality methods to assess the cost-effectiveness of new anti-cancer drugs. This study aims to develop a global economic model that could be used as a benchmark for the economic evaluation of new therapies for MBC. Methods The Global Pharmacoeconomics of Metastatic Breast Cancer (GPMBC) model is a Markov model that was constructed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of new treatments for MBC from a Canadian healthcare system perspective over a lifetime horizon. Specific parameters included in the model are cost of drug treatment, survival outcomes, and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Global parameters are patient characteristics, health states utilities, disutilities, and costs associated with treatment-related AEs, as well as costs associated with drug administration, medical follow-up, and end-of-life care. The GPMBC model was tested and validated in a specific context, by assessing the cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole compared with other widely used first-line therapies for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) MBC. Results When tested, the GPMBC model led to incremental cost-utility ratios of CA$131 811 per QALY, CA$56 211 per QALY, and CA$102 477 per QALY for the comparison of lapatinib plus letrozole vs letrozole alone, trastuzumab plus anastrozole, and anastrozole alone, respectively. Results of the model testing were quite similar to those obtained by Delea et al., who also assessed the cost-effectiveness of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in HR+/HER2 + MBC in Canada, thus suggesting that the GPMBC model can replicate results of well-conducted economic evaluations. Conclusions The GPMBC model can be very valuable as it allows a quick and valid assessment of the cost-effectiveness of any new treatments for MBC in a Canadian context.

Trastuzumab Emtansine for Treating HER2-Positive, Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer After Treatment with Trastuzumab and a Taxane: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (Kadcyla(®); Roche) to submit evidence of its clinical and cost-effectiveness for treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after treatment with trastuzumab and a taxane. The School of Health and Related Research Technology Appraisal Group (ScHARR-TAG) at the University of Sheffield were the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG) who produced a critical review of the company's submission to NICE. The ERG also independently searched for relevant evidence and modified the submitted decision analytic model to produce a revised estimate of cost-effectiveness and examine the impact of altering some of the key assumptions. The clinical effectiveness data were taken from two randomised controlled trials that reported a significant advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) for T-DM1 over lapatinib in combination with capecitabine (EMILIA trial), and over the treatment of physician's choice (TH3RESA trial). A network meta-analysis suggested T-DM1 was the best treatment in terms of both overall survival and PFS compared with lapatinib in combination with capecitabine; trastuzumab in combination with capecitabine; and capecitabine monotherapy. Adverse event (AE) data were taken from a pooled analysis of additional trials of T-DM1 as a single agent. The most common grade 3 or greater AEs for T-DM1 were thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity. Following the clarification process, the manufacturer reported a deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for T-DM1 compared with lapatinib in combination with capecitabine of £167,236, the latter of which was estimated to have an ICER of £49,798 compared with capecitabine monotherapy. The ERG produced similar values of £166,429 and £50,620 respectively. All other comparators were dominated. During the appraisal, the manufacturer offered an analysis of a patient access scheme (PAS), which suggested that T-DM1 had a 0 % probability of being cost-effective at an ICER of £30,000 per QALY gained. The NICE Appraisal Committee concluded that while the clinical effectiveness of T-DM1 had been proven, it was not likely to represent a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources and therefore its use could not be recommended.

Target prices for mass production of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for global cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate sustainable generic prices for 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). BACKGROUND: TKIs have proven survival benefits in the treatment of several cancers, including chronic myeloid leukaemia, breast, liver, renal and lung cancer. However, current high prices are a barrier to treatment. Mass production of low-cost generic antiretrovirals has led to over 13 million people being on HIV/AIDS treatment worldwide. This analysis estimates target prices for generic TKIs, assuming similar methods of mass production. METHODS: Four TKIs with patent expiry dates in the next 5 years were selected for analysis: imatinib, erlotinib, lapatinib and sorafenib. Chemistry, dosing, published data on per-kilogram pricing for commercial transactions of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), and quotes from manufacturers were used to estimate costs of production. Analysis included costs of excipients, formulation, packaging, shipping and a 50% profit margin. Target prices were compared with current prices. Global numbers of patients eligible for treatment with each TKI were estimated. RESULTS: API costs per kg were $347-$746 for imatinib, $2470 for erlotinib, $4671 for lapatinib, and $3000 for sorafenib. Basing on annual dose requirements, costs of formulation/packaging and a 50% profit margin, target generic prices per person-year were $128-$216 for imatinib, $240 for erlotinib, $1450 for sorafenib, and $4020 for lapatinib. Over 1 million people would be newly eligible to start treatment with these TKIs annually. CONCLUSIONS: Mass generic production of several TKIs could achieve treatment prices in the range of $128-$4020 per person-year, versus current US prices of $75161-$139,138. Generic TKIs could allow significant savings and scaling-up of treatment globally, for over 1 million eligible patients.

Structural Uncertainty of Markov Models for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Simulation Study of Lapatinib.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of structural uncertainty of Markov models in modeling cost-effectiveness for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Four common Markov models for ABC were identified and examined. Markov models 1 and 2 have 4 health states (stable-disease, responding-to-therapy, disease-progressing, and death), and Markov models 3 and 4 only have 3 health states (stable-disease, disease-progressing, and death). In models 1 and 3, the possibility of death can occur in any health state, while in models 2 and 4, the chance of dying can only occur in the disease-progressing health state. A simulation was conducted to examine the impact of using different model structures on cost-effectiveness results in the context of a combination therapy of lapatinib and capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. Model averaging with an assumption of equal weights in all 4 models was used to account for structural uncertainty. RESULTS: Markov model 3 yielded the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $303,909 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), while Markov model 1 produced the highest ICER ($495,800/QALY). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, the probabilities that the combination therapy is considered to be cost-effective for Markov models 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 14.5%, 14.1%, 21.6%, and 17.0%, respectively. When using model averaging to synthesize different model structures, the resulting ICER was $389,270/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that modeling ABC with different Markov model structures yielded a wide range of cost-effectiveness results, suggesting the need to investigate structural uncertainty in health economic evaluation. When applied in the context of HER2-positive ABC treatment, the combination therapy with lapatinib is not cost-effective, regardless of which model was used and whether uncertainties were accounted for.

Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for colorectal cancer: results from a validation study.

We sought to develop criteria for ERBB2-positivity (HER2) in colorectal cancer to ensure accurate identification of ERBB2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer patients suitable for enrollment in a phase II trial of ERBB2-targeted therapy (HERACLES trial). A two-step approach was used. In step 1, a consensus panel of pathologists adapted existing protocols for use in colorectal cancer to test ERBB2 expression and amplification. Collegial revision of an archival test cohort of colorectal cancer samples led to specific recommendations for adapting current breast and gastric cancer criteria for scoring ERBB2 in colorectal cancer. In step 2, from September 2012 to January 2015, colorectal-specific ERBB2 testing protocols and ERBB2 scoring criteria were used to centrally screen for ERBB2-positive KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients to be enrolled in the HERACLES trial (clinical validation cohort). In both archival test (N=256) and clinical validation (N=830) cohorts, a clinically sizeable 5% fraction of KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients was found to be ERBB2-positive according to the colorectal cancer-specific ERBB2 scoring criteria. ERBB2-positive tumors showed ERBB2 immunostaining consisting of intense membranous ERBB2 protein expression, corresponding to homogenous ERBB2 amplification, in >50% of cells. None of the immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+ cases was amplified. Concordance between SISH and FISH was 100%. In conclusion, we propose specific criteria for defining ERBB2-positivity in colorectal cancer (HERACLES Diagnostic Criteria). In a phase II trial of trastuzumab and lapatinib in a cetuximab-resistant population, HERACLES Diagnostic Criteria shaped the selection of patients and defined ERBB2 as a predictive marker for response to ERBB2-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Safety Profile and Costs of Related Adverse Events of Trastuzumab Emtansine for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Compared to Capecitabine Plus Lapatinib from the Perspective of the Canadian Health-Care System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, KADCYLA(®)) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of the cytotoxic agent DM1 and trastuzumab (HERCEPTIN(®)). The safety profile of T-DM1 in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane was investigated in the phase III EMILIA trial. The trial demonstrated clinically and statistically meaningful differences in the safety profile between T-DM1 and capecitabine plus lapatinib (CAP + LAP). The objective of this study was to estimate the costs of managing treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients and grade 2 AEs that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients taking T-DM1 compared with patients taking CAP + LAP based on the EMILIA trial, from the perspective of Canadian public payers. METHODS: An Excel-based model was utilized to estimate the relevant costs. Clinical data were obtained from the EMILIA trial. Cost information was obtained from the literature, clinical experts, and standard cost sources. The analysis was conducted from the Canadian public-payer perspective and reported in 2014 Canadian dollars (CAD). RESULTS: The management of included treatment-related AEs resulted in higher estimated per-patient costs of CAD6901 for CAP + LAP versus CAD3380 for T-DM1, resulting in savings of CAD3521. CONCLUSIONS: From a Canadian perspective, this analysis demonstrated that utilizing T-DM1 for the management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer results in substantial savings to the public health-care system when considering the costs of treatment-related AEs, due to fewer amount of toxicities compared with CAP + LAP. Results of various sensitivity analyses investigating changes in number and costs of AEs confirmed the findings; however, the magnitude of cost savings varied. Further analyses are necessary to determine whether these cost savings would occur in other countries and health-care systems.

Phase I Study of Lapatinib and Pemetrexed in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Assessment of Circulating Cell Free Thymidylate Synthase RNA as a Potential Biomarker.

INTRODUCTION: Lapatinib is a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2. We report on a dose-escalation study of lapatinib combined with pemetrexed in second-line treatment to evaluate the safety and efficacy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an exploratory study in which circulating cell-free thymidylate synthase ribonucleic acid (cfTSmRNA) was measured in all patients and compared with clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC after 1 previous line of chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Three dose levels (DLs) of lapatinib (daily)/pemetrexed (every 21 days) were evaluated: DL0, 1250 mg/400 mg; DL1, 1250 mg/500 mg; and DL2, 1500 mg/500 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was identification of the optimal treatment regimen. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated (DL0: n = 4; DL1: n = 8; DL2: n = 6). The most common adverse events (any grade) were diarrhea (61%), rash (44%), nausea (33%), anemia, and fatigue (both 28%). DL1 was determined as optimal after 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle of DL2 (Grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis, Grade 4 lymphocytopenia); no other DLTs were observed. Partial response was detected in 4 patients. cfTSmRNA was at the limit of detection and was not measurable in all patients. Nonsignificant trends were observed, suggesting that higher levels of cfTSmRNA are associated with poorer outcome. Confirmatory studies are required. CONCLUSION: Lapatinib and pemetrexed was well tolerated, and data suggest a similar response rate to pemetrexed monotherapy.