Optimizing the Management Algorithm for Adults With Functional Constipation Failing a Fiber/Laxative Trial in General Gastroenterology: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Minimization Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Anorectal function testing is traditionally relegated to subspecialty centers. Yet, it is an office-based procedure that appears capable of triaging care for the many patients with Rome IV functional constipation that fail empiric over-the-counter therapy in general gastroenterology, as an alternative to empirical prescription drugs. We aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of routine anorectal function testing in this specific population. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective and a cost-minimization analysis from the insurer perspective to compare 3 strategies: (i) empiric prescription drugs followed by pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) for drug failure, (ii) empiric PFPT followed by prescription drugs for PFPT failure, or (iii) care directed by up-front anorectal function testing. Model inputs were derived from systematic reviews of prospective clinical trials, national cost data sets, and observational cohort studies of the impact of chronic constipation on health outcomes, healthcare costs, and work productivity. RESULTS: The most cost-effective strategy was upfront anorectal function testing to triage patients to appropriate therapy, in which the subset of patients without anal hypocontractility on anorectal manometry and with a balloon expulsion time of at least 6.5 seconds would be referred to PFPT. In sensitivity analysis, empiric PFPT was more cost effective than empiric prescription drugs except for situations in which the primary goal of treatment was to increase bowel movement frequency. If adopted, gastroenterologists would refer ∼17 patients per year to PFPT, supporting feasibility. DISCUSSION: Anorectal function testing seems to be an emergent technology to optimize cost-effective outcomes, overcoming testing costs by phenotyping care.

Picosulfato de sodio para alivio del estreñimiento / Sodium Picosulfate for Constipation Relief

INTRODUCCIÓN: La evidencia de cuidados paliativos es un planteamiento para mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes (adultos y niños) y sus familias, que afrontan problemas inherentes a una enfermedad potencialmente mortal. El de cuidados paliativos es un planteamiento para mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes (adultos y niños) y sus familias, que afrontan problemas inherentes a una enfermedad potencialmente mortal. Los cuidados paliativos permiten prevenir y aliviar el sufrimiento mediante la detección temprana, la evaluación correcta y el tratamiento del dolor y otros problemas. La atención paliativa previene y alivia el sufrimiento de todo orden, físico, psicológico, social o espiritual, que experimentan los adultos y niños que viven con problemas de salud que limitan la vida. Promueve la dignidad, la calidad de vida y la adaptación a las enfermedades progresivas, y utiliza para ello los mejores datos probatorios disponibles. Se calcula que en el mundo se requieren cuidados paliativos en el 40% al 60% de las defunciones 2. Los cuidados paliativos son necesarios para una amplia gama de enfermedades que limitan la vida. La mayoría de los adultos que los precisan tienen enfermedades crónicas, como enfermedades cardiovasculares (38,5%), cáncer (34%), enfermedades respiratorias crónicas (10,3%), sida (5,7%) y diabetes (4,6%). Muchas otras afecciones pueden requerir cuidados paliativos, incluidas la insuficiencia renal, la hepatopatía crónica, la artritis reumatoide, las enfermedades neurológicas, la demencia, las anomalías congénitas y la tuberculosis farmacorresistente. El dolor es uno de los síntomas más frecuentes y graves que sufren los pacientes que necesitan cuidados paliativos. Los analgésicos opioides son esenciales para tratar el dolor y otros síntomas físicos penosos comunes que se asocian con numerosas enfermedades progresivas en estado avanzado. Por ejemplo, el 80% de los pacientes con sida o cáncer y el 67% de los que padecen enfermedades cardiovasculares o enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica experimentará dolor de moderado a intenso al final de la vida 3 En el 2011, el 83% de la población mundial vivía en países en los que el acceso a los analgésicos opioides era escaso o nulo. METODOLOGÍA: 1. Descripción del medicamento solicitado según FDA/AEMPS. 2. Informe Técnico: Revisión de la evidencia científica, recomendaciones de uso de las Agencias Reguladoras y Guías de Práctica Clínica de los medicamentos. 3. Costos del medicamento y disponibilidad. 4. Conclusiones. 5. Recomendaciones. RESULTADOS: Se han cotejado las fichas farmacológicas de Agencias Reguladoras como AEMPS/FDA, Con aprobación de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) desde 1996 y de la European Medicines Agency (EMA) desde 1997. Además de verificar Expediente Electrónico de la DNM, para: PICOSULFATO DE SODIO. Además, se han encontrado publicaciones científicas que avalan el uso de este medicamento para enfermedad de Alzheimer de moderada a grave. CONCLUSIONES: De acuerdo a la investigación de información técnica y científica sobre el tema, se concluye lo siguiente: El ISSS cuenta con un Centro Especializado Integral de Atención Ambulatoria La Ceiba, la cual suministra Atención domiciliar y Cuidados paliativos. El dolor es uno de los síntomas más frecuentes y graves que sufren los pacientes que necesitan cuidados paliativos. Los analgésicos opioides son esenciales para tratar el dolor y otros síntomas físicos penosos comunes que se asocian con numerosas enfermedades progresivas en estado avanzado. Por ejemplo, el 80% de los pacientes con sida o cáncer y el 67% de los que padecen enfermedades cardiovasculares o enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica experimentará dolor de moderado a intenso al final de la vida 18 En el 2011, el 83% de la población mundial vivía en países en los que el acceso a los analgésicos opioides era escaso o nulo. Según la OPS/OMS. el estreñimiento es altamente prevalente (50-95 %) en cuidados paliativos (CP). Alrededor del 90 % de los pacientes que reciben opioides fuertes y del 65% de los que no los reciben, requieren laxantes. A pesar de ser una importante causa de morbilidad, su importancia suele ser subestimada en el contexto de otros síntomas. Debido a las limitaciones que se encuentran en la definición de etiologías que encierra el término "estreñimiento", entre ellos: estreñimiento crónico idiopático, estreñimiento secundario por el uso de opioides, síndrome de intestino irritable con estreñimiento, entre otras, y cada una de estas etiologías representa una población diferente y por ende, un tratamiento específico. Además, entre las mismas etiologías de la enfermedad, existen diferencias de tratamiento entre pacientes según la edad y patologías subyacentes, por dar un ejemplo, el manejo del estreñimiento crónico idiopático es diferente en pacientes adultos que en población considerada de primera infancia. Varios medicamentos utilizados para el tratamiento del dolor y otros síntomas comunes en los cuidados paliativos, están incluidos en la Lista Modelo de la OMS de Medicamentos Esenciales para adultos y niños. Con estos medicamentos esenciales se puede aliviar adecuadamente la gran mayoría de los síntomas penosos para los pacientes. Los analgésicos opioides son esenciales para controlar eficazmente el dolor de moderado a intenso. Las directrices de la OMS del 2012 sobre manejo del dolor en niños recomiendan la analgesia fuerte con opioides, como esencial para el alivio del dolor de moderado a intenso en los niños. Desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano indican que tanto el picosulfato de sodio como la lactulosa, nominadas por el Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social no son estrategias costo efectivas frente al psyllium ya que este último tiene una mayor efectividad, pero, además, los costos estimados de utilizarlo son muchos menores. Al comparar la lactulosa (Código LOM 8020706), con las demás alternativas, se aprecia que es la menos efectiva, sin embargo, no es una diferencia sustancial, de hecho, es posible argumentar que ésta, junto con polietilenglicol, picosulfato de sodio, bisacodilo, prucaloprida y lubiprostone conforman un grupo con efectividades muy similares. Las diferencias que se aprecian están en el costo de las dos últimas, prucaloprida y lubiprostone tienen un costo que dobla al de las otras cuatro alternativas, bajo las condiciones actuales del mercado local (de Colombia). Con respecto a la información sobre efectividad y seguridad encontrada en las diferentes evaluaciones técnicas consultadas, sugieren que los medicamentos utilizados en estos casos, (mencionados arriba), son más efectivos frente al placebo, y que comparándolo uno a uno, estos no presentan diferencias de efectividad estadísticamente significativas.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

Cost-Effectiveness of Linaclotide Compared to Osmotic Laxatives in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation in China.

INTRODUCTION: Linaclotide, a selective agonist of guanylate cyclase C, was highly recommended for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). However, the cost-effectiveness of linaclotide in Chinese is not known, and this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of linaclotide for patients with IBS-C. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted with a Markov model from a societal perspective. The Markov model was structured to simulate the discontinuation and continuation of medication in IBS-C patients in clinical practice, as well as the revisit and non-visit of non-responding patients. The cycle of the model was 4 weeks, and the time horizon was 1 year. The efficacy data in the model was from the risk ratios obtained by the meta-analysis and the calculation of the response rate of the three medications. The utility, discontinuation rate of the medication, and revisit rate data were from published literature, while the cost data were obtained from experts' opinions and published literature. A series of sensitivity analyses was performed on parameters potentially having impact on the model outputs. RESULTS: The QALYs (quality-adjusted life years) gained for 1-year treatment with linaclotide, polyethylene glycol, and lactulose were 0.821, 0.795, and 0.781, respectively. The corresponding total costs were CNY 7,721 (USD 1,120), CNY 8,797 (USD 1,276) and CNY 9,481 (USD 1,375). In both comparisons, linaclotide was dominant. Compared with polyethylene glycol and lactulose, the likelihood of linaclotide being cost-effective was 100% for both, using 1 times per capita GDP per QALY as willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS: IBS-C seriously affects the quality of life of patients with IBS-C, and linaclotide can improve symptoms and quality of life at less cost.

[Tapentadol versus classical WHO-III opioids for chronic back pain. Health services research study based on representative data from health insurance funds]. / Tapentadol versus klassische WHO-III-Opioide bei chronischen Rückenschmerzen : Versorgungsforschungsstudie auf Basis repräsentativer Krankenkassendaten.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials, tapentadol prolonged release (PR) showed a more favourable gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared to other strong opioids in the treatment of pain. The present analysis compared tapentadol PR and classical WHO-III PR opioids in routine clinical practice. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study (matched pair approach) using anonymised health insurance data of patients with chronic low back pain who were prescribed strong opioids following pretreatment with WHO-I/II analgesics. Data were analysed from the date of first prescription in 2015 over a maximum period of two years. The primary analysis parameter was the prescription of laxatives. RESULTS: Data of 227 patients per cohort could be included in the analysis. Significantly fewer tapentadol PR than WHO-III PR patients were prescribed laxatives (20.3% vs. 37%; p < 0.0001). In addition, laxative dosages were significantly lower in the tapentadol PR cohort (26.4 vs. 82.5 defined daily doses; p < 0.0001). A significant difference in laxative prescription was also observed under long-term treatment (tapentadol PR patients 27.7% vs. WHO-III PR patients 50%; p = 0.0029). CONCLUSION: Routine clinical practice indirectly confirmed the more favourable gastrointestinal tolerability of tapentadol PR in the treatment of chronic pain which had previously been demonstrated in clinical trials and non-interventional studies.

Cost of Constipation: A New Look With a Focus on New Medications.

GOAL: The study was designed to assess drug costs for constipation therapy and to relate costs to markers of functional status. BACKGROUND: Secretagogues have been introduced as new agents for the treatment of constipation. Previously published modeling studies suggested that improved productivity lowers the indirect disease burden and balances the higher drug costs. STUDY: Data were abstracted from the publicly available Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to identify adults with a functional gastrointestinal disorder who received a prescription for laxatives or secretagogues covering >2 days. Demographic data, recorded health care utilization and cost, and markers of functional status were extracted for the years from 2005 to 2017 to determine differences between participants treated with secretagogues or laxatives. RESULTS: The cohort of 2006 persons was female predominant [67.8%; age: 56.9 (55.8-57.9) years] and spent $92.89 (75.68-110.10) for medications treating constipation. The use of secretagogues (10.3% of the cohort) was the best independent predictor of constipation treatment costs. Using quality of life measures, perceived limitations in activities or work, and absenteeism, there was no difference between participants receiving laxatives and those taking secretagogues. CONCLUSION: Using survey data designed to be representative of the United States population, the study identified secretagogues as a key cost factor in drug treatment of constipation. The results do not support models suggesting improved role functioning offsets these higher direct expenditures. While prospective comparative studies are needed to more definitively correlate costs with direct or indirect benefits of different agents, limiting the use of more expensive medications to otherwise refractory cases may help to reign in the spiraling health care costs in this country.

Magnesium Oxide in Constipation.

Magnesium oxide has been widely used as a laxative for many years in East Asia, yet its prescription has largely been based on empirical knowledge. In recent years, several new laxatives have been developed, which has led to a resurgence in interest and increased scientific evidence surrounding the use of magnesium oxide, which is convenient to administer, of low cost, and safe. Despite these advantages, emerging clinical evidence indicates that the use of magnesium oxide should take account of the most appropriate dose, the serum concentration, drug-drug interactions, and the potential for side effects, especially in the elderly and in patients with renal impairment. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence base for the clinical use of magnesium oxide for treating constipation and provide a pragmatic guide to its advantages and disadvantages.

A Case-Based Approach to Constipation in Primary Care.

Primary care physicians frequently evaluate patients with constipation. The history is crucial in uncovering warning symptoms and signs that warrant colonoscopy. Particular elements in the history and rectal examination also can provide clues regarding the underlying etiology. Regardless of etiology, lifestyle modifications, fiber, and laxatives are first-line therapies. Patients who fail first-line therapies can be offered second-line treatments and/or referred for testing of defecatory function. In those with severely refractory symptoms, referrals to a gastroenterologist and a surgeon should be considered.

Assessment, diagnosis and management of constipation.

Constipation is a common, treatable condition that can be experienced by all age groups. This article outlines the different types of constipation and explains how the condition is diagnosed. A comprehensive and person-centred assessment is fundamental to identifying constipation, and should include taking the patient's clinical history and discussing any lifestyle factors that may be causing or contributing to the condition. This article also details the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that nurses can employ in the management of constipation, including providing advice on lifestyle changes and the use of laxatives.

An overview of interventions for constipation in adults.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing global prevalence of the symptoms of constipation adversely affects the quality of life (QOL) of symptomatic patients. An acceptable universal definition of constipation does not exist and a detailed history taking form each patient with various complaints including stool consistency, sensing of incomplete evacuation or a manual need to assist evacuation is required. Complexity of obtaining etiologic diagnosis and the wide range of therapeutic options can mislead physicians in choosing correct treatment. AREAS COVERED: This review, considers the pathophysiology of constipation and the diagnostic approach to identify the etiology of constipation. Available interventions including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and invasive methods such as acupuncture and surgical management are discussed. This review utilized on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov to search for studies and reviews published between 2000 and 2020. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Constipation necessitates careful considerations to detect the exact pathophysiology. Medical history, focused physical assessments, and selected diagnostic tests help choosing the right management. Non-pharmacological methods are beneficial in most of the cases. If a satisfactory response is not achieved, over the counter or prescribed medications are available. Options for patients who failed to respond to available medications are addressed in this review.

Assessment and management of pediatric constipation for the primary care clinician.

Constipation is a common problem in pediatrics and accounts for 3-5% of all pediatric office visits and 10-25% of all pediatric gastroenterology referrals. Functional constipation accounts for about 95% of constipation cases, but "red flag" symptoms that suggest organic causes need to be considered. A diagnosis of functional constipation can be made in absence of "red flag" symptoms and a normal physical assessment. Physical assessment should focus on growth, abdominal exam, inspection of the perianal region, and examination of the lumbosacral region. Abdominal x-rays are generally not useful to differentiate between functional and organic causes of constipation. Treatment of constipation includes dietary changes, medication use, and behavioral modification. Osmotic laxatives are used as first-line treatment, and stimulant laxatives can be added if there is no improvement with osmotic laxatives. Despite improvement with laxatives, 40-50% of children with constipation experience at least 1 relapse in 5 years. Quality improvement opportunities exist for improving care of children with functional constipation by specialists partnering with primary care.

Chronic Constipation in the United States: Results From a Population-Based Survey Assessing Healthcare Seeking and Use of Pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is characterized by unsatisfactory defecation and difficult or infrequent stools. CIC affects 9%-20% of adults in the United States, and although prevalent, gaps in knowledge remain regarding CIC healthcare seeking and medication use in the community. We recruited a population-based sample to determine the prevalence and predictors of (i) individuals having discussed their constipation symptoms with a healthcare provider and (ii) the use of constipation therapies. METHODS: We recruited a representative sample of Americans aged 18 years or older who had experienced constipation. Those who met the Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome and opioid-induced constipation were excluded. The survey included questions on constipation severity, healthcare seeking, and the use of constipation medications. We used multivariable regression methods to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 4,702 participants had experienced constipation (24.0% met the Rome IV CIC criteria). Among all respondents with previous constipation, 37.6% discussed their symptoms with a clinician (primary care provider 87.6%, gastroenterologist 26.0%, and urgent care/emergency room physician 7.7%). Age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, employment status, having a source of usual care, insurance status, comorbidities, locus of control, and constipation severity were associated with seeking care (P < 0.05). Overall, 47.8% of respondents were taking medication to manage their constipation: over-the-counter medication(s) only, 93.5%; prescription medication(s) only, 1.3%; and both over-the-counter medication(s) and prescription medication(s), 5.2%. DISCUSSION: We found that 3 of 5 Americans with constipation have never discussed their symptoms with a healthcare provider. Furthermore, the use of prescription medications for managing constipation symptoms is low because individuals mainly rely on over-the-counter therapies.

Evaluation and Comparison of Daiokanzoto and Lubiprostone for Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Daiokanzoto (DKT) and lubiprostone (LPS) are drugs used for constipation, but few studies have compared them. This study examined the effectiveness, adverse events, and medical economic efficiency of DKT and LPS for constipation. Patients who received DKT (DKT group) and those who received LPS (LPS group) during admission to Ogaki Municipal Hospital between November 2012 and May 2016 were enrolled. Drug efficacy was evaluated based on the median value of bowel movement frequency over 1 week before and after drug administration, and their safety was evaluated by the presence or absence of diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. To assess medical economic efficiency, drug costs for constipation per week were calculated. The median values (quartile ranges) of bowel movement frequency at 1 week after drug administration were 8.5 (6.0-12.0) in the DKT group and 5 (3.0-7.0) in the LPS group, which was significantly different (p < 0.01). Diarrhea occurred significantly less often in the DKT group (4 cases) than in the LPS group (17 cases) (p < 0.01). The median cost of drugs administered for constipation for 1 week was significantly lower in the DKT group (631 [quartile range, 513-653] yen) than in the LPS group (1431 [1135-2344] yen) (p < 0.01). DKT had a higher immediate effect on constipation and was associated with more frequent bowel movement and fewer adverse events of diarrhea than LPS, suggesting that it may be effective and safe for treating constipation, and DKT is inexpensive.

Prucalopride for the treatment of constipation: a view from 2015 and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Prucalopride is a prokinetic drug, that has been commercially available in recent years for the treatment of chronically constipated patients. In this update of a previous 2016 article, we reviewed the more recent data supporting its role in the treatment of constipation and constipation-associated conditions. Areas covered: We carried out an extensive literature review on the effects of prucalopride for the years 2012-2018 by means of scientific databases and manual research. More evidence was found on its possible therapeutic role in conditions in which constipation plays a role as an associated symptom, such as opioid-induced constipation, constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, post-operative ileus, colonic diverticular disease, drug-related constipation, and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Expert opinion: Based on the added literature evidence, we feel that prucalopride is an effective, although expensive, drug for the treatment of primary and secondary forms of constipation, and of other clinical conditions associated with constipation.

Children who soil: A review of the assessment and management of faecal incontinence.

Soiling is a common and distressing condition affecting children. In the vast majority of patients, it is associated with constipation. Most constipation is functional and is best thought of as difficulty achieving adequate bowel emptying. In a small minority of patients, there is no associated constipation, so-called non-retentive faecal incontinence. The aetiology of this latter condition in children remains unclear. The mainstay of management in all cases is a regular toileting programme, together with laxatives as required. This must be individualised considering the diagnosis, the age of the child and the psychosocial factors affecting the child and family. The diagnosis is made with a thorough history and examination, supplemented in some cases with targeted investigations. Engaging the child and family in a long-term treatment programme (at least 6 months to 2 years) is essential for treatment success. The following clinical practice guideline and algorithm for the assessment and management of children who soil represents consensus opinion using available evidence.

Implementing a Standardized Constipation-Management Pathway to Reduce Resource Utilization.

OBJECTIVE: Constipation is commonly diagnosed in our pediatric emergency department (ED). Care has varied significantly, with a heavy reliance on abdominal radiography (AR) for the diagnosis of and inpatient management for bowel cleanout. We implemented a standardized approach to caring for patients presenting to a pediatric ED with symptoms consistent with constipation, emphasizing clinical history, physical examination, less reliance on AR, and standardized home management. METHODS: Using quality improvement (QI) methodology, a multidisciplinary group developed an ED constipation management pathway, encouraging less reliance on AR for diagnosis and promoting home management over inpatient bowel cleanout. The pathway included a home management "gift basket" containing over-the-counter medications and educational materials to promote successful bowel cleanout. Outcome measures included pathway utilization, AR rate, ED cost and length of stay, and ED admission rate for constipation. RESULTS: Within 3 months, >90% of patients discharged home with an ED disposition diagnosis of constipation left with standardized educational materials and home medications. Staff education and feedback, pathway and gift basket changes, and a higher threshold for inpatient management led to significant decreases in AR rate (73.3%-24.6%, P < .001), average per-patient cost ($637.42-$538.85), length of stay (223-196 minutes, P < .001), and ED admission rate (15.3%-5.4%, P < .001), with no concerning missed diagnoses or increases in ED revisit rate. CONCLUSIONS: An ED QI project standardizing the care of pediatric constipation was implemented successfully, leading to a sustainable decrease in resource utilization. The next phase of the project will focus on collaborating with community providers to reduce ED utilization.