Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 110
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 6(3): e13235, 2020 07 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity has become a worldwide health problem, caused by multiple and complex factors. To face this challenge, governments have played a central role in combating its rise. Considering this, public policies are introduced or enacted for the benefit of whole populations, taking into account the perspective of multiverse social stakeholders based on solid scientific fundamentals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine obesity-related public policies in the United States and the District of Columbia, in order to understand their scientific basis. METHODS: We analyzed the public policies implemented in the United States from 2003 to 2013, during which time the largest number of obesity-related public policies were introduced, using text mining. RESULTS: In total, 1592 obesity-related public policies were retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multidisciplinary policies were predominant in the documents analyzed (533/1592, 33.5%), followed by health sciences (454/1592, 28.5%), social sciences (330/1592, 20.7%), life sciences (240/1592, 15.1%), and physical sciences (35/1592, 2.2%). Throughout the country, most policies were community oriented (1082/1865, 58.0%) and many of them were related to school and family environments (447/1865, 24.0%), early care and education (75/1865, 4.0%), hospitals (63/1865, 3.4%), and workplaces (47/1865, 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The contents of obesity-related public policies were generally uniformly framed across the United States. They were generally based on scientific references, in which there was a predominance of multidisciplinary research. These findings are consistent with what is known about the multiple factors causing obesity and about the methods being developed to control the epidemic.


Assuntos
Mineração de Dados/métodos , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Obesidade , Política Pública/tendências , Mineração de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Legislação como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
3.
Toxicol Lett ; 296: 10-22, 2018 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30006252

RESUMO

The ongoing debate concerning the regulation of endocrine disruptors, has increasingly led to questions concerning the current testing of chemicals and whether this is adequate for the assessment of potential endocrine disrupting effects. This paper describes the current testing approaches for plant protection product (PPP) active substances in the European Union and the United States and how they relate to the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties for human and environmental health. This includes a discussion of whether the current testing approaches cover modalities other than the estrogen, androgen, thyroid and steroidogenesis (EATS) pathways, sensitive windows of exposure, adequate assessment of human endocrine disorders and wildlife species, and the determination of thresholds for endocrine disruption. It is concluded, that the scope and nature of the core and triggered data requirements for PPP active substances are scientifically robust to address adverse effects mediated through endocrine mode(s) of action and to characterise these effects in terms of dose response.


Assuntos
Agroquímicos/toxicidade , Disruptores Endócrinos/toxicidade , Regulamentação Governamental , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Toxicologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Toxicologia/métodos , Animais , Animais Selvagens , Exposição Ambiental , Monitoramento Ambiental , Poluição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos
6.
Acad Med ; 93(8): 1135-1141, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668523

RESUMO

Innovation ecosystems tied to academic medical centers (AMCs) are inextricably linked to policy, practices, and infrastructure resulting from the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980. Bayh-Dole smoothed the way to patenting and licensing new drugs and, to some degree, medical devices and diagnostic reagents. Property rights under Bayh-Dole provided significant incentive for industry investments in clinical trials, clinical validation, and industrial scale-up of products that advanced health care. Bayh-Dole amplified private investment in biotechnology drug development and, from the authors' perspective, did not significantly interfere with the ability of AMCs to produce excellent peer-reviewed science. In today's policy environment, it is increasingly difficult to patent and license products based on the laws of nature-as the scope of patentability has been narrowed by case law and development of a suitable clinical and business case for the technology is increasingly a gating consideration for licensees. Consequently, fewer academic patents are commercially valuable. The role of technology transfer organizations in engaging industry partners has thus become increasingly complex. The partnering toolbox and organizational mandate for commercialization must evolve toward novel collaborative models that exploit opportunities for future patent creation (early drug discovery), data exchange (precision medicine using big data), cohort assembly (clinical trials), and decision rule validation (clinical trials). These inputs contribute to intellectual property rights, and their clinical exploitation manifests the commercialization of translational science. New collaboration models between AMCs and industry must be established to leverage the assets within AMCs that industry partners deem valuable.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/tendências , Inovação Organizacional , Prática Associada/tendências , Patentes como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Prática Associada/legislação & jurisprudência , Transferência de Tecnologia , Estados Unidos
7.
J Hum Lact ; 34(2): 276-281, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584521

RESUMO

Most incarcerated women in Canada are mothers. Because women are the fastest growing population in carceral facilities, protecting the rights of incarcerated women to breastfeed their children is increasingly important. There is considerable evidence that incarcerated women in Canada experience poor physical and mental health, isolation, and barriers to care. Incarcerated women and their children could benefit significantly from breastfeeding. This Insight in Policy explores policy and legal protection for breastfeeding in Canada as it relates to carceral facilities, considers key cases regarding breastfeeding rights among incarcerated women, and presents recommendations for policy development and advocacy. The Canadian Constitution and human rights legislation across Canada prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender and includes pregnancy and the possibility of becoming pregnant as a characteristic of gender. Some provinces note that breastfeeding is a characteristic of gender. Women's Wellness Within, a nonprofit organization providing volunteer perinatal support to criminalized women in Nova Scotia, conducted a scan of all provincial and territorial correctional services acts and the federal Corrections and Conditional Release Act: none mention breastfeeding. Protocols for breastfeeding during arrest and lockup by police were not available in any jurisdiction across Canada. International law, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Nelson Mandela Rules, and the Bangkok Rules, have application to the rights of incarcerated breastfeeding women. The Inglis v. British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) (2013) and Hidalgo v. New Mexico Department of Corrections (2017) decisions are pivotal examples of successful litigation brought forward by incarcerated mothers to advance breastfeeding rights. Improved application and understanding of existent law could advance breastfeeding rights.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Política de Saúde , Prisioneiros/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Mães/psicologia
8.
Hosp Top ; 95(2): 32-39, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28379066

RESUMO

Healthcare in the United States has been one topic of the debates and discussion in the country for many years. The challenge for affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare for most Americans has been on the agenda of federal and state legislatures. There is probably no other state that has drawn as much individual attention regarding this challenge as the state of Massachusetts. While researching the topic for this article, it was discovered that financial and political perspectives on the success or failure of the healthcare model in Massachusetts vary depending on the aspect of the system being discussed. In this article the authors give a brief history and description of the Massachusetts Healthcare Law, explanation of how the law is financed, identification of the targeted populations in Massachusetts for which the law provides coverage, demonstration of the actual benefit coverage provided by the law, and review of the impact of the law on healthcare providers such as physicians and hospitals. In addition, there are explanations about the impact of the law on health insurance companies, discussion of changes in healthcare premiums, explanation of costs to the state for the new program, reviews of the impact on the health of the insured, and finally, projections on the changes that healthcare facilities will need to make to maintain fiscal viability as a result of this program.


Assuntos
Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Política de Saúde , Legislação como Assunto/normas , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/normas , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Massachusetts , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
10.
Soc Sci Med ; 170: 97-105, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27768943

RESUMO

Several United Nations bodies have advised countries to actively preserve Traditional Medicine (TM) knowledge and prevent its misappropriation in regulatory structures. To help advance decision-making around this complex regulatory issue, we examine the relationship between risk discourse, epistemology and policy. This study presents a critical, postcolonial analysis of divergent risk discourses elaborated in two contrasting Ontario (Canada) government reports preceding that jurisdiction's regulation of acupuncture, the world's most widely practised TM therapy. The earlier (1996) report, produced when Ontario's regulatory lobby was largely comprised of Chinese medicine practitioners, presents a risk discourse inclusive of biomedical and TM knowledge claims, emphasizing the principle of regulatory 'equity' as well as historical and sociocultural considerations. Reflecting the interests of an increasingly biomedical practitioner lobby, the later (2001) report uses implicit discursive means to exclusively privilege Western scientific perspectives on risk. This report's policy recommendations, we argue, suggest misappropriation of TM knowledge. We advise regulators to consider equitable adaptations to existing policy structures, and to explicitly include TM evidentiary perspectives in their pre-regulatory assessments.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura/tendências , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Medicina Tradicional/tendências , Controle Social Formal/métodos , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Características Culturais , Humanos , Medicina Tradicional/métodos , Ontário
13.
J Appl Toxicol ; 35(10): 1073-85, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26046543

RESUMO

Current evidence of engineered nanomaterials' (ENM) toxicity has led to a latent concern about hazards for both humans and the environment. For this reason, some efforts have been made to suggest frameworks or other guidance to regulate ENM handling; however, the real exposure risk to humans has not been well established. The aims of this work were to analyze the difficulties in establishing regulations for ENM and to discuss some considerations that may be helpful for policy makers involved in the regulation of ENM. Difficulties in establishing regulations are based on the novel properties of ENM associated with cytotoxic effects, the insufficiency of standardized methods to test those effects and the lack of epidemiological evidence of ENM toxicity, especially in occupational settings. Nevertheless, we offer some suggestions for establishing regulations, which include frameworks oriented towards protecting personnel exposed to ENM without decreasing production. In addition, we propose an ENM data sheet to offer available information of ENM. Finally, ethical aspects should also be considered in developing ENM regulations because every person who is working around or consuming ENM has the right to be informed about the potential risk.


Assuntos
Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Nanoestruturas , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Política Pública , Risco , Medição de Risco
14.
Physis (Rio J.) ; 25(1): 231-250, Jan-Mar/2015.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-745994

RESUMO

Com base nas contribuições de N. Elias e H. Becker, buscamos identificar os processos de patologização e penalização do uso de drogas presentes em proposições legislativas apresentadas ao Congresso Nacional durante a 53ª Legislatura. As 147 proposições reunidas através do descritor "álcool, tabaco e outras drogas" no banco de dados do Observatório da Saúde no Legislativo também dizem respeito a diferentes temas, como "alimentação e nutrição" e "propaganda". No inteiro teor de alguns projetos de lei, há uma recorrente indistinção entre uso, abuso e dependência de substâncias psicoativas ilícitas e lícitas; inclusive na própria ementa dos mesmos é patente uma tendência no sentido do aumento da pena dirigida a usuários e também distribuidores de drogas. A atuação do Poder Legislativo no que tange à questão das drogas contribui para sua penalização e patologização, mais do que para sua politização.


Using concepts by N. Elias and H. Becker, we identified processes of pathologization and penalization of drug use in legislative proposals submitted to the National Congress during the 53th Legislature in Brazil. The 147 proposals gathered using "alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs" as descriptor on the database of the Congress Health Watch address other topics as well, such as "food and nutrition" and "advertising". At the core of some legal reform projects lays a recurrent lack of distinction between use, abuse, and dependence with regard to illicit psycho-active substances. A tendency to increase jail time for both distributors and users also evident. The role of the Legislature is key to the issue of drug use, contributing to its criminalizing and pathologization, rather than to its politicization.


Assuntos
Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/legislação & jurisprudência , Poder Legislativo , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Medicalização/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle Social Formal , Brasil , Fumar Maconha/legislação & jurisprudência
15.
J Trauma Stress ; 27(5): 501-8, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25322879

RESUMO

Although knowledge about posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has grown over the past 40 years, PTSD policy research is undeveloped. This gap in knowledge warrants attention because policy is among the most powerful tools to prevent and mitigate the effects of PTSD. This study provides a content analysis of all bills introduced in U.S. Congress that explicitly mentioned PTSD. All bills and bill sections mentioning PTSD were coded to create a legislative dataset. Bills that addressed traumatic stress, but did not mention PTSD, were also identified as a comparison group. One hundred sixty-one PTSD explicit bills containing 382 sections of legislative text were identified, as were 43 traumatic stress, non-PTSD bills containing 55 sections (the 2 categories were mutually exclusive). Compared to traumatic stress, non-PTSD sections, PTSD explicit sections were far more likely to target military populations (23.6% vs. 91.4%) and combat exposures (14.5% vs. 91.4%). PTSD, as a discrete diagnostic entity, has been largely defined as a problem unique to combat exposure and military populations in federal legislation. Research is needed to understand knowledge and perceptions of PTSD among policy makers and the public to inform science-based advocacy strategies that translate the full spectrum of PTSD research into policy.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Militares/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Desastres , Humanos , Legislação como Assunto/tendências , Delitos Sexuais , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Guerra
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA