The changing regulatory landscape for biomedical implants and its relationship to withdrawal of some vaginal mesh products.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advancements in biomedical engineering and advanced therapies including tissue engineering products necessitate revisions to the regulation and governance of their production and use to ensure patient safety. In this review, the current regulations and recent improvements on the governance of biomedical devices are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Current regulations on approval of biomedical devices failed to address some important aspects related to the definition of biocompatibility of medical implants. The main issue was that the failure to establish design requirements for a specific application - in this case, the pelvic floor. Another issue was the lack of knowledge on disease mechanisms leading to an inability to define clear targets for surgical treatment. A clear example of this is the recent vaginal mesh scandal. SUMMARY: Surgical innovations are inherently challenging. It is no surprise that the regulatory landscape lags behind advancements in biomedical technologies. Very recent modifications to the available regulations particularly in Europe aim to establish a robust, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework for medical devices, which ensures patient safety while supporting innovation.

A review of international medical device regulations: Contact lenses and lens care solutions.

Medical devices are under strict regulatory oversight worldwide and such regulations prioritise patient safety and efficacy over anything else. Contact lenses fall under the medical device category - a result of direct contact with the eye. Equally regulated are the contact lens care product solutions, which include cleaning and maintenance solutions and lubricating and rewetting drops. In the USA, it is the FDA Centre for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) overseeing the regulations of medical devices, since 1976. In the European Union, it is the EU Commission responsible for regulating devices in Member States. The categorisation of contact lenses into medical devices is based on their inherent risk to the wearer. Contact lenses are subject to crucial regulatory oversight from concept to clinical evaluation, clinical investigations through to the finished lens product, and finally, strict conditions associated with their marketing approval including post-marketing surveillance. The physiochemical and manufacturing testing, such as biocompatibility testing alongside pre-clinical stability, sterility and microbiological testing are just some of the essential testing lenses must endure. Only through understanding the inherent risks and potential complications that can arise from contact lens wear, can one truly appreciate the need to adhere to strict regulations. The challenge however, lies in the need for more standardised regulations and flexible approaches, ensuring innovative device technologies reach patients in a timely manner without compromising public health and safety. This review highlights some key requirement, differences and similarities between the FDA and EU administrations in the approval of contact lenses.

[Strengthening health regulation in the Americas: regulatory authorities of regional reference]. / Fortalecimiento de la regulación sanitaria en las Américas: las autoridades reguladoras de referencia regional.

Health technology regulation and quality assurance are critical to the development of national pharmaceutical policies, and implementing these actions is the responsibility of national regulatory authorities, whose level of development and maturity affect the quality, safety, and effectiveness of the products made available to the public. On the initiative of the regulatory authorities themselves, together with the Pan American Health Organization, the Region of the Americas promotes the strengthening of health regulation through an evaluation and certification process that allows for the designation of regulatory authorities of regional reference for drugs and biological products. Over the period from its implementation to the present, six authorities have been certified and one is in the process of obtaining certification. These authorities work jointly and promote dialogue and regulatory convergence, information-sharing to facilitate regulatory decision making, and regional cooperation to support the establishment of other authorities in the Region--actions having direct impact on access to effective and quality-assured health technologies. Their combined efforts have led to the recognition of this process of evaluation and certification by the World Health Organization (WHO). Among the actions resulting from the International Consultation on Regulatory Systems Strengthening, WHO recommended taking a close look at this model to assess its potential scale-up at the global level.

[Better regulatory framework needed for medical devices]. / Bättre regelverk behövs för medicintekniska produkter - HTA-utredning av läkemedelsavgivande stentar och ballonger vid benartärsjukdom visar på bristerna.

We summarize an HTA report regarding patient values of drug-eluting stents and balloons for treatment of atherosclerotic disease in the lower extremities. We found 17 randomized controlled trials, 4 cohort studies and 13 case series. The total number of studied patients was substantial (about 3,000) but there was a strong heterogeneity regarding site of lesion, symptom pattern, device, drug used and outcome measures, making the analysis difficult and based on relatively small subgroups. We found low certainty of evidence (GRADE ++) for a reduced risk of restenosis in patients with critical ischemia and lesions below the knee, and also a modest beneficial effect on ischemic symptoms in a mixed patient population. However, we also identified a worrying safety signal, with increased risk for amputation in a group of patients with below-the-knee disease and critical ischemia. The results highlight the need for a structured system for validation of medical devices, a system analogous to that currently used for evaluation of new pharmacological products.

Regulatory Considerations in the Design and Manufacturing of Implantable 3D-Printed Medical Devices.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing, or additive manufacturing, technology has rapidly penetrated the medical device industry over the past several years, and innovative groups have harnessed it to create devices with unique composition, structure, and customizability. These distinctive capabilities afforded by 3D printing have introduced new regulatory challenges. The customizability of 3D-printed devices introduces new complexities when drafting a design control model for FDA consideration of market approval. The customizability and unique build processes of 3D-printed medical devices pose unique challenges in meeting regulatory standards related to the manufacturing quality assurance. Consistent material powder properties and optimal printing parameters such as build orientation and laser power must be addressed and communicated to the FDA to ensure a quality build. Postprinting considerations unique to 3D-printed devices, such as cleaning, finishing and sterilization are also discussed. In this manuscript we illustrate how such regulatory hurdles can be navigated by discussing our experience with our group's 3D-printed bioresorbable implantable device.

Assessing new developments in the pre-market regulatory process of medical devices in the People's Republic of China.

The objective of this paper is to provide a systematic overview of the Chinese medical device registration processes, identify challenges and suggest how these can be addressed. In addition, the paper will outline the impact of new policies and regulations since the restructuring of the China FDA. A systematic review was performed for journal articles between the year of 2009 and 2013 in the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect and Zhongguozhiwang. The review has identified 184 papers which were potentially relevant. Seventeen articles were included in the review, which highlights the challenges and opportunities related to the medical device registration process. In order to understand the actual impact of the regulation environment and its policies including the lack of regulatory guidance regular assessment updates are crucial. The results of this paper are aimed at informing regulatory bodies, health policy decision makers, national and international Health Technology Assessment networks as well as medical devices manufacturers.