Intracranial pressure monitoring in diffuse brain injury-why the developing world needs it more?

BACKGROUND: Use of ICP monitoring is considered to be part of "standard of care" in management of severe traumatic brain injury, but it is rarely used in developing countries. The authors present a study which evaluates the efficacy and outcomes of ICP monitoring at a high-volume trauma center in India. METHODS: Data on management and outcomes for 126 patients who were admitted with diffuse traumatic brain injury (GCS 3-8) were studied prospectively over an 18-month period. These patients were treated by one of the two specific protocols: ICP monitoring-based or non-ICP monitoring-based. The primary outcome was measured based on 2 weeks mortality and GOS-E at 1, 3, and 6 months. Secondary outcome was measured based on need for brain-specific treatment, length of ICU stay, and radiation exposure. RESULTS: Mortality in a subset of patients who underwent surgical intervention later due to increased ICP values, drop in GCS, or radiological deterioration was noted to be significantly lower in the ICP monitoring group (p = 0.03), in spite of statistically insignificant difference in overall mortality rates between groups. GOS-E scores at 1 month were significantly better (p = 0.033) in ICP monitoring group, even though they equalized at 3 and 6 months. The need for brain-specific treatment (p < 0.001), radiation exposure (p < 0.001), and length of ICU stay (p = 0.013) was significantly lower in the ICP monitoring group. CONCLUSIONS: ICP monitoring-based treatment protocol helps in achieving faster recovery; lowers mortality rates in operated patients; and reduces ICU stay, radiation exposure, and the need for brain-specific treatment.

Not every trauma patient with a radiographic head injury requires transfer for neurosurgical evaluation: Application of the brain injury guidelines to patients transferred to a level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with radiographically-identified traumatic brain injury are often transferred to our regional trauma center for neurosurgical evaluation, yet few injuries require neurosurgical intervention. Transfer is costly, inconvenient, and potentially risky in inclement weather. We propose that previously-published brain injury guidelines (BIG)1 can help to determine which patients could avoid mandatory transfer. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients transferred between January 2012 and December 2013 was performed. Patients were classified as having minor (BIG 1), moderate (BIG 2), or severe (BIG 3) head injuries based on previously-published guidelines. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: No BIG 1 patients deteriorated or required surgical intervention. One BIG 2 patient required a non-emergent operation and another was readmitted with a worsened injury. In the BIG 3 group, 11.9% required neurosurgical procedures and 20% died. CONCLUSIONS: The BIG classification can help stratify patients for whom transfer is considered.

The Head Injury Transportation Straight to Neurosurgery (HITS-NS) randomised trial: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Reconfiguration of trauma services, with direct transport of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients to neuroscience centres (NCs), bypassing non-specialist acute hospitals (NSAHs), could potentially improve outcomes. However, delays in stabilisation of airway, breathing and circulation (ABC) and the difficulties in reliably identifying TBI at scene may make this practice deleterious compared with selective secondary transfer from nearest NSAH to NC. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance and systematic reviews suggested equipoise and poor-quality evidence - with regard to 'early neurosurgery' in this cohort - which we sought to address. METHODS: Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of bypass to NC conducted in two ambulance services with the ambulance station (n = 74) as unit of cluster [Lancashire/Cumbria in the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) and the North East Ambulance Service (NEAS)]. Adult patients with signs of isolated TBI [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of < 13 in NWAS, GCS score of < 14 in NEAS] and stable ABC, injured nearest to a NSAH were transported either to that hospital (control clusters) or bypassed to the nearest NC (intervention clusters). PRIMARY OUTCOMES: recruitment rate, protocol compliance, selection bias as a result of non-compliance, accuracy of paramedic TBI identification (overtriage of study inclusion criteria) and pathway acceptability to patients, families and staff. 'Open-label' secondary outcomes: 30-day mortality, 6-month Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions. RESULTS: Overall, 56 clusters recruited 293 (169 intervention, 124 control) patients in 12 months, demonstrating cluster randomised pre-hospital trials as viable for heath service evaluations. Overall compliance was 62%, but 90% was achieved in the control arm and when face-to-face paramedic training was possible. Non-compliance appeared to be driven by proximity of the nearest hospital and perceptions of injury severity and so occurred more frequently in the intervention arm, in which the perceived time to the NC was greater and severity of injury was lower. Fewer than 25% of recruited patients had TBI on computed tomography scan (n = 70), with 7% (n = 20) requiring neurosurgery (craniotomy, craniectomy or intracranial pressure monitoring) but a further 18 requiring admission to an intensive care unit. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed the two trial arms to be equivalent in terms of age, GCS and severity of injury. No significant 30-day mortality differences were found (8.8% vs. 9.1/%; p > 0.05) in the 273 (159/113) patients with data available. There were no apparent differences in staff and patient preferences for either pathway, with satisfaction high with both. Very low responses to invitations to consent for follow-up in the large number of mild head injury-enrolled patients meant that only 20% of patients had 6-month outcomes. The trial-based economic evaluation could not focus on early neurosurgery because of these low numbers but instead investigated the comparative cost-effectiveness of bypass compared with selective secondary transfer for eligible patients at the scene of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Current NHS England practice of bypassing patients with suspected TBI to neuroscience centres gives overtriage ratios of 13 : 1 for neurosurgery and 4 : 1 for TBI. This important finding makes studying the impact of bypass to facilitate early neurosurgery not plausible using this study design. Future research should explore an efficient comparative effectiveness design for evaluating 'early neurosurgery through bypass' and address the challenge of reliable TBI diagnosis at the scene of injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68087745. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of a Less Invasive, Low-Cost Surgical Technique of Osteoplastic Decompressive Craniectomy.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has many technical details with significant constraining logistic/economic considerations in low-resource practice areas. We present a less invasive, cost-saving, and evidence-based technique of DC evolving in our practice. METHODS: Earlier, we reported a technique of hinge decompressive craniectomy (hDC), in which the frontotemporoparietal skull flap is hinged on the temporal muscle. In this article we describe further refinements of this temporal muscle hDC : The scalp flap is raised in a galeal-skeletonizing plane preserving the subgaleal fascia on the pericranium, ready for use for duraplasty after durotomy. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical outcome of this surgical technique in a prospective consecutive cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary and secondary clinical outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and survival, respectively, and the immediate as well as long-term surgical wound issues. RESULTS: There were 40 cases, 38 men (95%) and 2 women over a 40-month period with a mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 17), or severe TBI (n = 15). As assessed by the computed tomography Rotterdam score, life-threatening significant brain injury was present in 90%. Poor clinical outcome occurred in about a third of cases (32.5%) mainly in the severe TBI group (77% of poor outcome) and not in the mild TBI group. Surgical site complications occurred in four patients (10%) CONCLUSIONS: The presented modified temporal muscle hDC technique offers significant economic advantages over the traditional surgical method of DC without added complications. Analysis of the clinical data in a consecutive prospective cohort of patients with potentially fatal TBI who underwent this surgical procedure showed a good outcome in at least two thirds.

Bone flap resorption following cranioplasty in a cost-constrained scenario.

Bone flap resorption is an infrequently reported yet significant late complication of autologous bone cranioplasty. It requires serial imaging both to pick up and to monitor progression. Custom-made implants avoid this complication, but are expensive. In a resource-limited situation, when bone flaps placed in the abdomen undergo demineralisation and sutures are used to fix the flap as opposed to plates, where artificial cranial flap substitutes are prohibitively expensive and frequent postoperative imaging may not be feasible, prevention and management of this complication will continue to remain a problem.

Assessment of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Using Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Surgically Managed Brain Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation is a risk factor for ischemic damage following severe brain injury. Autoregulation can be assessed indirectly using intracranial pressure monitoring as a surrogate of cerebral blood volume, but this measure may not be applicable to patients following decompressive craniectomy. Here, we describe assessment of autoregulation using regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). METHODS: In seven patients with severe brain trauma who underwent neurological surgery, a Hemedex® rCBF probe was placed intraoperatively in peri-lesional tissue. Autoregulation was assessed as a moving Pearson correlation between CPP and rCBF (rCBFx). RESULTS: Composite data from all patients showed relatively constant perfusion over a wide CPP range (50-90 mmHg) and a U-shaped autoregulation curve with maximal autoregulation (CPPopt) at 55-60 mmHg. All rCBF values fell below the ischemic threshold (<18 ml/100 g/min) when CPPs were <50 mmHg compared with 11 % ischemia when CPPs >50 mmHg (P < 0.05). We examined the percent time during which both autoregulation was intact and rCBF exceeded the ischemic threshold. In the composite data, this variable was maximal in the CPP range of 75-80 mmHg (CPPideal). In individual patients, the range of CPPs with intact autoregulation varied widely. Individual CPPopt values ranged between 60 and 100 mmHg and CPPideal ranged between 65 and 105 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of autoregulation with Hemedex® rCBF monitor is feasible and could be used to guide CPP management strategies to optimize both autoregulation and perfusion. Autoregulatory impairment and CPPopt vary considerably between patients, and the addition of rCBF monitoring could help guide CPP targeting decisions.

Aggressive operative treatment of isolated blunt traumatic brain injury in the elderly is associated with favourable outcome.

Outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the elderly has not been fully elucidated. The present retrospective observational study investigates the age-dependent outcome of patients suffering from severe isolated TBI with regard to operative and non-operative treatment. Data were prospectively collected in the TraumaRegister DGU. Anonymous datasets of 8629 patients with isolated severe blunt TBI (AISHead≥3, AISBody≤1) documented from 2002 to 2011 were analysed. Patients were grouped according to age: 1-17, 18-59, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years. Cranial fractures (44.8%) and subdural haematomas (42.6%) were the most common TBIs. Independent from the type of TBI the group of patients with operative treatment declined with rising age. Subgroup analysis of patients with critical TBI (AISHead=5) revealed standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.87) in case of operative treatment (n=1201) and 1.13 (95% CI 1.09-1.18) in case of non-operative treatment (n=1096). All age groups ≥60 years showed significantly reduced SMRs in case of operative treatment. Across all age groups the group of patients with low/moderate disability according to the GOS (4 or 5 points) was higher in case of operative treatment. Results of this retrospective observational study have to be interpreted cautiously. However, good outcome after TBI with severe space-occupying haemorrhage is more frequent in patients with operative treatment across all age groups. Age alone should not be the reason for limited care or denial of operative intervention.

The practice of cranial neurosurgery and the malpractice liability environment in the United States.

OBJECT: The potential imbalance between malpractice liability cost and quality of care has been an issue of debate. We investigated the association of malpractice liability with unfavorable outcomes and increased hospitalization charges in cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent cranial neurosurgical procedures from 2005-2010, and were registered in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We used data from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) from 2005 to 2010 to create measures of volume and size of malpractice claim payments. The association of the latter with the state-level mortality, length of stay (LOS), unfavorable discharge, and hospitalization charges for cranial neurosurgery was investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 189,103 patients (mean age 46.4 years, with 48.3% females) who underwent cranial neurosurgical procedures, and were registered in NIS. In a multivariable regression, higher number of claims per physician in a state was associated with increased ln-transformed hospitalization charges (beta 0.18; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.19). On the contrary, there was no association with mortality (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.06). We observed a small association with unfavorable discharge (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.13), and LOS (beta 0.01; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.03). The size of the awarded claims demonstrated similar relationships. The average claims payment size (ln-transformed) (Pearson's rho=0.435, P=0.01) demonstrated a positive correlation with the risk-adjusted hospitalization charges but did not demonstrate a correlation with mortality, unfavorable discharge, or LOS. CONCLUSIONS: In the present national study, aggressive malpractice environment was not correlated with mortality but was associated with higher hospitalization charges after cranial neurosurgery. In view of the association of malpractice with the economics of healthcare, further research on its impact is necessary.

Cranial neurosurgical 30-day readmissions by clinical indication.

OBJECT: Postsurgical readmissions are common and vary by procedure. They are significant drivers of increased expenditures in the health care system. Reducing readmissions is a national priority that has summoned significant effort and resources. Before the impact of quality improvement efforts can be measured, baseline procedure-related 30-day all-cause readmission rates are needed. The objects of this study were to determine population-level, 30-day, all-cause readmission rates for cranial neurosurgery and identify factors associated with readmission. METHODS: The authors identified patient discharge records for cranial neurosurgery and their 30-day all-cause readmissions using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) State Inpatient Databases for California, Florida, and New York. Patients were categorized into 4 groups representing procedure indication based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were developed to identify patient characteristics associated with readmissions. The main outcome measure was unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: A total of 43,356 patients underwent cranial neurosurgery for neoplasm (44.23%), seizure (2.80%), vascular conditions (26.04%), and trauma (26.93%). Inpatient mortality was highest for vascular admissions (19.30%) and lowest for neoplasm admissions (1.87%; p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmissions were 17.27% for the neoplasm group, 13.89% for the seizure group, 23.89% for the vascular group, and 19.82% for the trauma group (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of 30-day readmission for neoplasm were Medicaid payer (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54) and fluid/electrolyte disorder (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1.62); for seizure, male sex (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17-2.60) and index admission through the emergency department (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.45-3.43); for vascular, Medicare payer (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.39) and renal failure (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.29-1.80); and for trauma, congestive heart failure (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.80) and coagulopathy (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.25-1.84). Many readmissions had primary diagnoses identified by the AHRQ as potentially preventable. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of 30-day readmission rates for patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery varied by diagnosis between 14% and 24%. Important patient characteristics and comorbidities that were associated with an increased readmission risk were identified. Some hospital-level characteristics appeared to be associated with a decreased readmission risk. These baseline readmission rates can be used to inform future efforts in quality improvement and readmission reduction.

Trends and outcome predictors after traumatic brain injury surgery: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

OBJECT: The authors sought to analyze trends in hospital resource utilization and mortality rates in a population of patients who had received traumatic brain injury (TBI) surgery. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study retrospectively analyzed 18,286 patients who had received surgical treatment for TBI between 1998 and 2010. The multiple linear regression model and Cox proportional hazards model were used for multivariate assessment of outcome predictors. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of surgical treatment for patients with TBI gradually but significantly (p < 0.001) increased by 47.6% from 5.0 per 100,000 persons in 1998 to 7.4 per 100,000 persons in 2010. Age, sex, Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index score, hospital volume, and surgeon volume were significantly associated with TBI surgery outcomes (p < 0.05). Over the 12-year period analyzed, the estimated mean hospital treatment cost increased 19.06%, whereas the in-hospital mortality rate decreased 10.9%. The estimated mean time of overall survival after TBI surgery (± SD) was 83.0 ± 4.2 months, and the overall in-hospital and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 74.5%, 67.3%, 61.1%, and 57.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal an increased prevalence of TBI, especially in older patients, and an increased hospital treatment cost but a decreased in-hospital mortality rate. Health care providers and patients should recognize that attributes of the patient and of the hospital may affect hospital resource utilization and the mortality rate. These results are relevant not only to other countries with similar population sizes but also to countries with larger populations.

Outcome and surgical management for geriatric traumatic brain injury: analysis of 888 cases registered in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.

OBJECTIVE: As the aged population is rapidly growing globally, geriatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) becomes an increasing problem. There are higher mortality and poorer functional outcome in the geriatric TBI population (≥65 years) compared with younger groups despite neurosurgical interventions. Therefore, current treatment priorities and cost-effectiveness should be critically examined. We evaluated the benefit of surgical management in the elderly (≥65 years) after TBI. METHODS: A total of 3194 patients with confirmed TBI were enrolled from 1998 to 2011, in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. Retrospective analysis was conducted from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank on 888 (28%) patients (≥65 years) who did and did not undergo surgery. In particular, the effect of low Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (3-5) was compared with outcome with and without surgery. RESULTS: Of all the patients 65 years of age and over, 478 (54%) were given surgical management (craniectomy, craniotomy, or burr-hole evacuation). This group of patients had significantly more favorable outcome at 6 months (18% vs. 7%) and less mortality (62% vs. 81%). However, within this surgical group, patients with initial GCS scores of 3-5 had significantly more unfavorable outcome (96% vs. 79%) and more mortality (87% vs. 57%) compared with those with GCS scores of 6-15. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that age is a major determinant of outcome after TBI. In addition, we found that neurosurgical management is associated with the improvement of the prognosis and a decrease in the rate of mortality in geriatric TBI. However, surgical management was not shown to be an effective treatment in elderly patients with GCS scores of 3-5.

[Quality of life after multiple trauma]. / Lebensqualität nach Polytrauma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple trauma is an independent injury pattern which, because of its complexity, is responsible for 25 % of the costs for the treatment of all injured patients. Because of the often long-lasting physical impairment and the high incidence of residual permanent handicaps, it is apparent that multiple trauma can lead to a reduction in patient quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to give an overview of the known data concerning the change in quality of life for multiple trauma patients. Furthermore, predictors for the reduction of quality of life after multiple trauma will be identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MedLine search was performed to identify studies dealing with the outcome after multiple trauma. RESULTS: In addition to functional outcome parameters, the term quality of life has become more important in recent years when it comes to evaluating the outcome following injury. While the mortality after multiple trauma could be significantly reduced over the years, there is no comparable effect on the quality of life. Predictors for a worse quality of life after multiple trauma are female gender, high age, low social status, concomitant head injuries and injury to the lower extremities. CONCLUSION: The fact that mortality after multiple trauma has decreased but not impairment of the quality of life makes it clear that in addition to the acute medical treatment, a follow-up treatment including not only physiotherapy but also psychotherapy is crucial for multiple trauma patients.

Intermittent versus continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage management in adult severe traumatic brain injury: assessment of intracranial pressure burden.

INTRODUCTION: There is clinical equipoise regarding whether neurointensive care unit management of external ventricular drains (EVD) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) should involve an open EVD, with continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), versus a closed EVD, with intermittent opening as necessary to drain CSF. In a matched cohort design, we assessed the relative impact of continuous versus intermittent CSF drainage on intracranial pressure in the management of adult severe TBI. METHODS: Sixty-two severe TBI patients were assessed. Thirty-one patients managed by open EVD drainage were matched by age, sex, and injury severity (initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score) to 31 patients treated with a closed EVD drainage. Patients in the open EVD group also had a parenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placed through an adjacent burr hole, allowing real-time recording of ICP. Hourly ICP and other pertinent data, such as length of stay in intensive care unit (LOS-ICU), Injury Severity Score, and survival status, were extracted from our prospective database. RESULTS: With age, injury severity (initial GCS score), and neurosurgical intervention adjusted for, there was a statistically significant difference of 5.66 mmHg in mean ICP (p < 0.0001) between the open and the closed EVD groups, with the closed EVD group exhibiting greater mean ICP. ICP burden (ICP ≥ 20 mmHg) was shown to be significantly higher in the intermittent EVD group (p = 0.0002) in comparison with the continuous EVD group. CONCLUSION: Continuous CSF drainage via an open EVD seemed to be associated with more effective ICP control in the management of adult severe TBI.

Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate outcomes after a novel nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injuries patients with small intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in a rural trauma center without neurosurgical capabilities. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. In 2007, a nontransfer protocol was implemented at a Level III Trauma Center. It included adult patients from April 2007 through December 2012 with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13 to 15) and computed tomography (CT) showing small ICH and no coagulopathy. The following ICHs were allowed: 1) minimal or small traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2) punctuate or minimal superficial cerebral contusion, 3) punctuate or minimal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, or 4) very small subdural hemorrhage (SDH) without mass effect (a very thin smear SDH along the tentorium or falx). CT scans were reviewed by the on-call neurosurgeon at an affiliated Level I Trauma Center, and consensus was obtained on the suitability for nontransfer. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. The median hospital length of stay was 1 day (interquartile range = 1 day). No patient required a neurosurgical intervention or postadmission transfer to a Level I facility. There were no in-hospital deaths, and all patients were discharged with stable head CTs and in good neurologic condition. Two patients were readmitted for nonprotocol-related reasons: 1 acute-on-chronic SDH 6 weeks postdischarge, and 1 visual eye change with normal CT 2 days postdischarge. CONCLUSIONS: Our 6-year study corroborates the low neurosurgical rate reported in the literature for mTBI with small ICH. Nontransfer protocols may lead to a more efficient use of hospital resources while providing safe, effective and economical health care.

Temporal trends and volume-outcome associations after traumatic brain injury: a 12-year study in Taiwan.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in traumatic brain injury (TBI); the impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost, and in-hospital mortality rate; and to explore predictors of these outcomes in a nationwide population in Taiwan. METHODS: This population-based patient cohort study retrospectively analyzed 16,956 patients who had received surgical treatment for TBI between 1998 and 2009. Bootstrap estimation was used to derive 95% confidence intervals for differences in effect sizes. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to predict outcomes. RESULTS: Patients treated in very-high-volume hospitals were more responsive than those treated in low-volume hospitals in terms of LOS (-0.11; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.03) and hospitalization cost (-0.28; 95% CI -0.49 to -0.06). Patients treated by high-volume surgeons were also more responsive than those treated by low-volume surgeons in terms of LOS (-0.19; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.01) and hospitalization cost (-0.43; 95% CI -0.81 to -0.05). The mean LOS was 24.3 days and the average LOS for very-high-volume hospitals and surgeons was 61% and 64% shorter, respectively, than that for low-volume hospitals and surgeons. The mean hospitalization cost was US $7,292.10, and the average hospitalization cost for very-high-volume hospitals and surgeons was 19% and 22% lower, respectively, than that for low-volume hospitals and surgeons. Advanced age, male sex, high Charlson Comorbidity Index score, treatment in a low-volume hospital, and treatment by a low-volume surgeon were significantly associated with adverse outcomes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that annual surgical volume is the key factor in surgical outcomes in patients with TBI. The results improve the understanding of medical resource allocation for this surgical procedure, and can help to formulate public health policies for optimizing hospital resource utilization for related diseases.

Hospital care of childhood traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1997-2009: a neurosurgical perspective.

OBJECT: The goal in this paper was to study hospital care for childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a nationwide population base. METHODS: Data were acquired from the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for the years 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009. Admission for TBI was defined by any ICD-9-CM diagnostic code for TBI. Admission for severe TBI was defined by a principal diagnostic code for TBI and a procedural code for mechanical ventilation; admissions ending in discharge home alive in less than 4 days were excluded. RESULTS: Estimated raw and population-based rates of admission for all TBI, for severe TBI, for death from severe TBI, and for major and minor neurosurgical procedures fell steadily during the study period. Median hospital charges for severe TBI rose steadily, even after adjustment for inflation, but estimated nationwide hospital charges were stable. Among 14,932 actual admissions for severe TBI captured in the KID, case mortality was stable through the study period, at 23.9%. In a multivariate analysis, commercial insurance (OR 0.86, CI 0.77-0.95; p = 0.004) and white race (OR 0.78, CI 0.70-0.87; p < 0.0005) were associated with lower mortality rates, but there was no association between these factors and commitment of resources, as measured by hospital charges or rates of major procedures. Increasing median income of home ZIP code was associated with higher hospital charges and higher rates of major and minor procedures. Only 46.8% of admissions for severe TBI were coded for a neurosurgical procedure of any kind. Fewer admissions were coded for minor neurosurgical procedures than anticipated, and the state-by-state variance in rates of minor procedures was twice as great as for major procedures. Possible explanations for the "missing ICP monitors" are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood brain trauma is a shrinking sector of neurosurgical hospital practice. Racial and economic disparities in mortality rates were confirmed in this study, but they were not explained by available metrics of resource commitment. Vigilance is required to continue to supply neurosurgical expertise to the multidisciplinary care process.

Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury.

In all fields of clinical medicine, there is an increasing awareness that outcome must be assessed in terms of quality of life and cost effectiveness, rather than merely length of survival. This is especially the case when considering decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. The procedure itself is technically straightforward and involves temporarily removing a large section of the skull vault in order to provide extra space into which the injured brain can expand. A number of studies have demonstrated many patients going on to make a good long-term functional recovery, however, this is not always the case and a significant number survive but are left with severe neurocognitive impairment. Unfortunately, many of these patients are young adults who were previously fit and well and are, therefore, likely to spend many years in a condition that they may feel to be unacceptable, and this raises a number of ethical issues regarding consent and resource allocation. In an attempt to address these issues, we have used the analytical framework proposed by Jonsen, that requires systematic consideration of medical indications, patient preferences, quality of life and contextual features.

Modified acrylic cranioplasty for large cranial defects.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique for constructing polymethylmethacrylate (acrylic) cranioplasty to repair large cranial defects. METHODS: A rim of bone is cut from the edge of the skull defect using a craniotome. This bony rim provides a scaffold to fashion the acrylic cement away from the patient thus avoiding thermal injury to the brain. The inner edge of the bony rim is drilled circumferencially to form a groove. Acrylic is then used to fill the defect in the bony rim with continuous manipulation of the paste from both sides to form a dome in the shape of the skull. The groove allows the edge of the acrylic dome to fit snugly with the bony rim thus avoiding sinking. The final cranioplasty, comprised of the hardened acrylic dome with the surrounding bone rim, is firmly attached to the skull with bioplates. RESULTS: We used the modified acrylic cranioplasty technique in three patients. Modified acrylic cranioplasty is cheaper and immediately available, compared with ten cases of titanium cranioplasty, with similar cosmetic outcome, intraoperative blood loss and operating theatre time. CONCLUSION: Our technique is quick and easy to perform, avoids thermal injury to the brain and produces a strong implant with excellent cosmesis even with large bony defects.

Is aggressive treatment of traumatic brain injury cost-effective?

OBJECT: The object of this study was to determine whether aggressive treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), including invasive intracranial monitoring and decompressive craniectomy, is cost-effective. METHODS: A decision-analytical model was created to compare costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of 3 strategies for treating a patient with severe TBI. The aggressive-care approach is compared with "routine care," in which Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines are not followed. A "comfort care" category, in which a single day in the ICU is followed by routine floor care, is included for comparison only. Probabilities of each treatment resulting in various Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores were obtained from the literature. The GOS scores were converted to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), based on expected longevity and calculated quality of life associated with each GOS category. Estimated direct (acute and long-term medical care) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs were calculated from the perspective of society. Sensitivity analyses employed a 2D Monte Carlo simulation of 1000 trials, each with 1000 patients. The model was also used to estimate these values for patients 40, 60, and 80 years of age. RESULTS: For the average 20-year-old, aggressive care yields 11.7 (± 1.6 [SD]) QALYs, compared with routine care (10.0 ± 1.5 QALYs). This difference is highly significant (p < 0.0001). Although the differences in effectiveness between the 2 strategies diminish with advancing age, aggressive care remains significantly better at all ages. When all costs are considered, aggressive care is also significantly less costly than routine care ($1,264,000 ± $118,000 vs $1,361,000 ± $107,000) for the average 20-year-old. Aggressive care remains significantly less costly until age 80, at which age it costs more than routine care. However, even in the 80-year-old, aggressive care is likely the more cost-effective approach. Comfort care is associated with poorer outcomes at all ages and with higher costs for all groups except 80-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: When all the costs of severe TBI are considered, aggressive treatment is a cost-effective option, even for older patients. Comfort care for severe TBI is associated with poor outcomes and high costs, and should be reserved for situations in which aggressive approaches have failed or testing suggests such treatment is futile.