Efficacy and Safety of Generic Dasatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Multicenter Prospective Study in China.

BACKGROUND: Brand-name dasatinib was approved for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase (CML-CP) patients due to its deeper and faster molecular response than imatinib. Generics, as the alternative, low-cost forms, are much in demand. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of generic dasatinib (Yinishu) as a first-line treatment in CML-CP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study from May 2016 to October 2018 with a 2-year follow-up analysis. All patients were given 100 mg/d (initial dose) of the generic dasatinib once a day. The primary endpoint was the major molecular response (MMR) calculated based on the BCR-ABL1 gene mutation rate of ≤ .1% at 12 months. RESULTS: Among 55 patients in CP observed for at least 3 months, 80.4% achieved MMR at 12 months. The cumulative MR4.5 was 58.2% by 24 months. Responses occurred rapidly, with 69.1% of patients achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 3 months and 70.9% achieving CCyR by 6 months. The estimated 2-year PFS and OS were both 96%, with a median follow-up time of 24 months. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 8.5% of patients, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11.9% of patients. Nonhematologic toxicity was usually mild and manageable. Pleural effusion occurred in 20.3% of patients, and only 1 patient (1.7%) had a grade 3 pleural effusion. No grade 4 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Generic dasatinib is an effective option for newly diagnosed CML-CP patients, producing an MMR early in a greater number of patients during their therapy.

Comparison of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular assays for early assessment of long-term clinical impact after BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia.

To compare the clinical significance of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular monitoring, we analyzed 1,410 paired cytogenetic and molecular data from 705 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Based on early cytogenetic response (ECyR, Ph+≤35 %) and molecular response (EMR, BCR-ABL1IS≤10 %) at 3 months, the patients were divided into four groups (group 1: ECyR + EMR, n = 560; group 2: no ECyR + EMR, n = 27; group 3: ECyR + no EMR, n = 55; group 4: no ECyR + no EMR, n = 63). By 10 years, major molecular response (MMR), deep molecular response (MR4.5), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were significantly high in group 1 (P < 0.001). Comparing groups 2 and 3, the MMR (P = 0.096), MR4.5 (P = 0.945), OS (P = 0.832), and PFS (P = 0.627) rates tended to be higher in group 2, although not significantly. Thus, the cytogenetic assay can not only be useful but its addition may also provide a more precise prediction of MR4.5.

Results of the European survey on the assessment of deep molecular response in chronic phase CML patients during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (EUREKA registry).

PURPOSE: The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommends quantification of BCR-ABL1 transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR every 3 months during TKI treatment. Since a proportion of patients in deep molecular response (DMR: MR4, MR4.5, MR5) maintain remission after treatment stop, assessment of DMR is crucial. However, systematically collected molecular data, monitored with sensitive standardized assays, are not available outside clinical trials. METHODS: Data were collected on the standardized assessment of molecular response in the context of real-life practice. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels after > 2 years of TKI therapy were evaluated for DMR by local laboratories as well as standardized EUTOS laboratories. Since standardized molecular monitoring is a prerequisite for treatment discontinuation, central surveillance of the performance of the participating laboratories was carried out. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 3377 peripheral blood samples from 1117 CML patients were shipped to 11 standardized reference laboratories in six European countries. BCR-ABL1 transcript types were b3a2 (41.63%), b2a2 (29.99%), b2a2/b3a2 (3.58%) and atypical (0.54%). For 23.72% of the patients, the initial transcript type had not been reported. Response levels (EUTOS laboratory) were: no MMR, n = 197 (6.51%); MMR, n = 496 (16.40%); MR4, n = 685 (22.64%); MR4.5, n = 937 (30.98%); MR5, n = 710 (23.47%). With a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.708, a substantial agreement between EUTOS-certified and local laboratories was shown. CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter DMR assessment is feasible in the context of real-life clinical practice in Europe. Information on the BCR-ABL1 transcript type at diagnosis is crucial to accurately monitor patients' molecular response during or after TKI therapy.

First-line therapy for chronic phase CML: selecting the optimal BCR-ABL1-targeted TKI.

Patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and treated with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have long life spans. Selection of an appropriate first-line therapy can be difficult as both the unique characteristics of each TKI and patient need to be taken into account to find the optimal match. Patient characteristics include comorbidities, concomitant medications, lifestyle, risk factors, BCR-ABL1 transcript type (e.g. b2a2 or b3a2) and additional chromosomal abnormalities. Just as patients differ, side effects, drug-drug interactions, administration plans, dosing schedules and treatment-related expenses across TKIs also vary. Alignment of these characteristics with the appropriate TKI is key to successfully initiating CML treatment. Continued success relies on communication between the patient and the healthcare team, adherence and optimization of therapy once it is initiated. In this review, we discuss these factors, in addition to TKI efficacy and safety, the cost of therapy, the future of treating CML and treatment-free remission.

Comprehensive therapeutic outcomes of frontline imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients in Korea: feasibility assessment of current ELN recommendation.

Optimal responses during imatinib therapy are commonly defined following the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations. Achievements of these optimal responses have not, however, been comprehensively tested as response-related prognostic factors using single center data sets. We evaluated the parameters using long-term (median 63 months) outcomes from 363 chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib as frontline therapy at our center. Intention-to-treat analysis showed comparable rates of complete cytogenetic response (86 %), major molecular response (MMR, 54 %), and complete molecular response (MR(4.5), 8 %). Estimated overall survival, progression-free survival, and event-free survival at 7 years were 94, 88 and 84 %, respectively. Achievement of recommended optimal response at 6 months (major cytogenetic response) and 12 months (complete cytogenetic response) yielded significantly better overall, progression-free, and event-free survival. However, achievement of recommended optimal response at 18 months (MMR) provided marginal benefit only in event-free survival. Most ELN criteria were predictive of long-term outcomes, with the exception of the clinical significance of achieving MMR at 18 months. Treatment adherence in the early treatment period was one of the important independent predictors of favorable long-term outcome. Durable cytogenetic and molecular responses were maintained in a majority of patients treated with optimal dose intensity.

Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: We studied BCR-ABL1 transcript levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting imatinib to identify molecular milestones that would predict for overall survival (OS) and other outcomes more reliably than serial marrow cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 282 patients with CML-CP who received imatinib 400 mg/d as first-line therapy followed by dasatinib or nilotinib if treatment with imatinib failed. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve to identify the cutoffs in transcript levels at 3, 6, and 12 months that would best predict patient outcome. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 95 patients treated elsewhere. RESULTS: Patients with transcript levels of more than 9.84% (n = 68) at 3 months had significantly lower 8-year probabilities of OS (56.9% v 93.3%; P < .001), progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response, and complete molecular response than those with higher transcript levels. Similarly, transcript levels of more than 1.67% (n = 87) at 6 months and more than 0.53% (n = 93) at 12 months identified high-risk patients. However, transcript levels at 3 months were the most strongly predictive for the various outcomes. When we compared OS for the groups defined molecularly at 6 and 12 months with the usual cytogenetic milestones, categorization by transcript numbers was the only independent predictor for OS (relative risk, 0.207; P < .001 and relative risk, 0.158; P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts performed at 3 months is the best way to identify patients destined to fare poorly, thereby allowing early clinical intervention.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on peripheral blood smears for monitoring Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) during interferon treatment: a new strategy for remission assessment.

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) alone or in combination with cytostatic drugs can induce major and durable cytogenetic responses in about 20 to 25% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Since these patients have a significant survival benefit, more frequent follow-up investigations have become clinically important but require bone marrow (BM) aspirates. The aim of our study was to evaluate interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (IPF) on peripheral blood (PB) smears as a rapid and reliable method to quantify Ph-positive myeloid cells. IPF analysis was performed on 49 PB samples from 36 patients in the chronic phase of CML and at different stages of cytogenetic remission. IPF results of 30 PB samples were compared with those from BM aspirates simultaneously obtained from the same patients to evaluate the correlation of Ph-positive cells. Further, the hypermetaphase FISH (HMF) technique was performed on cultured BM preparations of 31 patients for comparison with IPF results on PB. An excellent correlation was observed between the IPF results obtained on PB and BM samples (r = 0.98, y = x - 0.6, p < 0.0001). The mean difference between HMF from BM, on the one hand, and IPF from PB, on the other hand, was 3.2% (SD = +/- 8.4%). Seventy percent of samples were identically classified in one of the four subgroups of cytogenetic response. Thirty percent were classified in neighbouring response groups. We conclude that FISH performed on PB is a rapid and reliable method for assessing the cytogenetic response of CML patients on IFN-alpha based therapies, allowing more frequent and less invasive follow-up investigations although it is not able entirely to replace routine analysis of BM.