CAR T-cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Current results.

The marketing authorization of tisagenlecleucel, a 2nd generation of CD19-directed CAR T-cells, containing the 4-1 BB co-stimulatory domain, in 2017 in USA and in 2018 in EU, has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy in advanced B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in children, adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with relapsed or refractory disease. This innovative treatment, based on a "living drug", has shown very impressive short-term responses. However, safety profile and complex logistics require high expertise centers and tight collaborations between addressing and treating centers. Current research is exploring the possibility to move to first line ALL with high-risk features and/or first high-risk relapse. More efficient CAR T-cells products, are still lacking to counteract the escape mechanisms already described. Moreover, to define the bridge-to-CAR time for each patient remains a challenge to obtain optimal disease burden allowing expansion and persistence of CAR T-cells. Also difficult is to identify patients who will benefit from further therapy after infusion, such as allogeneic HSCT or may be immuno-modulatory treatment. Finally, CAR T-cells directed against T-ALL are only in their beginning but require more complex engineering process to avoid T- cell immune-deficiency or fratricide.

Immunophenotypic shift in the B-cell precursors from regenerating bone marrow samples: A critical consideration for measurable residual disease assessment in B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

Accurate knowledge of expression patterns/levels of commonly used MRD markers in regenerative normal-B-cell-precursors (BCP) is highly desirable to distinguish leukemic-blasts from regenerative-BCP for multicolor flow cytometry (MFC)-based measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the data highlighting therapy-related immunophenotypic-shift in regenerative-BCPs is scarce and limited to small cohort. Herein, we report the in-depth evaluation of immunophenotypic shift in regenerative-BCPs from a large cohort of BALL-MRD samples. Ten-color MFC-MRD analysis was performed in pediatric-BALL at the end-of-induction (EOI), end-of-consolidation (EOC), and subsequent-follow-up (SFU) time-points. We studied normalized-mean fluorescent intensity (nMFI) and coefficient-of-variation of immunofluorescence (CVIF) of CD10, CD19, CD20, CD34, CD38, and CD45 expression in regenerative-BCP (early, BCP1 and late, BCP2) from 200 BALL-MRD samples, and compared them with BCP from 15 regenerating control (RC) TALL-MRD samples and 20 treatment-naïve bone-marrow control (TNSC) samples. Regenerative-BCP1 showed downregulation in CD10 and CD34 expression with increased CVIF and reduced nMFI (p < 0.001), upregulation of CD20 with increased nMFI (p = 0.014) and heterogeneous CD45 expression with increased CVIF (p < 0.001). Immunophenotypic shift was less pronounced in the BCP2 compared to BCP1 compartment with increased CVIF in all but CD45 (p < 0.05) and reduced nMFI only in CD45 expression (p = 0.005). Downregulation of CD10/CD34 and upregulation of CD20 was higher at EOI than EOC and SFU time-points (p < 0.001). Regenerative-BCPs are characterized by the significant immunophenotypic shift in commonly used B-ALL-MRD markers, especially CD10 and CD34 expression, as compared to treatment-naïve BCPs. Therefore, the templates/database for BMRD analysis must be developed using regenerative-BCP.

Comparison of methods for assessment of minimal residual disease in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The level of minimal residual disease (MRD) early in treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) strongly predicts the risk of marrow relapse. As a variety of methods of varying complexity have been separately used for detecting and quantifying MRD, we compared the prognostic utility of three methods measurement of blast percentage on day 14 of treatment, detection of monoclonality on day 14 or day 35, and measurement of MRD by PCR-based limiting dilution analysis on day 14 or day 35. The study group comprised 38 children aged 1-15 with Philadelphia-negative B-lineage ALL who were uniformly treated and followed until relapse or for a minimum of 5 years. We also studied some of the technical factors which influence the ability to detect MRD. Measurement of blast percentage on day 14 by an expert morphologist, detection of monoclonality on day 35, and PCR-based measurement of MRD levels on days 14 and 35 all showed significant ability to divide patients into prognostic groups. Measurement of blast percentage on day 14 by routine morphology or detection of monoclonality on day 14 were not useful. The quality of DNA samples varied greatly, as determined by amplifiability in the PCR. However, virtually all amplifiable leukemic targets in a sample were detectable which suggests that the level of detection achieved by limiting dilution analysis is essentially determined by the amount of DNA which it is practicable to study. We conclude that quantification of MRD at the end of induction provides the full range of prognostic information for marrow relapse but is complex; detection of monoclonality on day 35 is simple and has good positive predictive value; and quantification of MRD on day 14 merits further study. PCR-based methods for measurement of MRD levels should incorporate a correction for variation in DNA amplifiability.