Assessment of the Quality of Sinus Elevation with Lateral Window Approach Procedure Videos on YouTube: A Content-quality Analysis.

Although the lateral window approach allows for greater graft material delivery and bone formation, it is more challenging and invasive, prompting keen interest among dentists to master this method. YouTube is increasingly used for medical training; however, concerns regarding the quality of instructional videos exist. This study proposes new criteria for evaluating YouTube videos on maxillary sinus elevation with the aim of establishing standards for assessing instructional content in the field. We sourced 100 maxillary sinus elevation videos from YouTube and, following exclusion criteria, analyzed 65 remaining videos. The video characteristics, content quality, and newly developed criteria were evaluated. Statistical analyses, employing ordinal logistic regression, identified the factors influencing the quality of instructional videos and evaluated the significance of our new criteria. Although video interaction and view rate exhibited positive relations to content quality, they were not significant ( P =0.818 and 0.826, respectively). Notably, videos of fair and poor quality showed a significant negative relation ( P <0.001). Audio commentary, written commentary, and descriptions of preoperative data displayed positive but statistically insignificant relationships ( P =0.088, 0.228, and 0.612, respectively). The comparison of video evaluation results based on the developed criteria with content quality scores revealed significant negative relationships for good, fair, and poor videos ( P <0.001, Exp(B)=-4.306, -7.853, -10.722, respectively). Among the various video characteristics, only image quality showed a significant relationship with content quality. Importantly, our newly developed criteria demonstrated a significant relationship with video content quality, providing valuable insights for assessing instructional videos on maxillary sinus elevation and laying the foundation for robust standards.

Radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus membrane and lateral wall thickness using cone-beam CT in different facial types in southwestern Saudi Arabia.

The anatomy of the edentulous posterior maxilla and maxillary sinus possess unique challenges in implant dentistry. The purpose of this study was to assess maxillary sinus membrane thickness (MT) and lateral wall thickness (LWT) in different facial index profiles and to describe the clinical implications. A retrospective image analysis of 75 CBCT scans was done, which yielded a total of 150 sinus images. The facial index was calculated as per the formula given in the text and grouped as euryprosopic, mesoprosopic and leptoprosopic. The images obtained were of 36 women (48%) and 39 men (52%), with maximum subjects in 30-39 years age group. MT and LWT were measured at three different points on the radiograph at every 3mm from the base of the sinus floor in premolar and molar regions of each image. Results showed females had significant differences from males in LWT in both premolar and molar regions (p = 0.018 and 0.032 respectively). Subjects in 40-49 years of age had significant differences (p = 0.021) in MT in premolar region only. Also, difference in MT in premolar and molar regions were also statistically significant. Lastly, the present study did not find any statistically significant difference in MT and LWT in all three facial indices groups. It can be concluded that different facial indices have no positive correlation with maxillary sinus membrane thickness and lateral wall thickness. Hence, surgical complications are avoidable with proper detailed knowledge and appropriate identification of the anatomic structures characteristic to the maxillary sinus.

Assessment of the osteogenic effect after maxillary sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by analyzing trabecular bone parameters: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this population-based retrospective study was to compare the osteogenic effect of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by quantitatively analyzing trabecular bone parameters. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 patients with missing posterior maxillary teeth who required MSFE and implantation were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: the non-graft group (n=50) and the graft group (n=50). Radiographic parameters were measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the quality of newly formed bone was analyzed by assessing trabecular bone parameters using CTAn (CTAnalyzer, SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium) software. RESULTS: In the selected regions of interest, the non-graft group showed greater bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), bone surface/total volume (BS/TV), trabecular number (Tb. N), and trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) than the graft group (p<0.001). The non-graft group showed lower trabecular separation (Tb. Sp) than the graft group (p<0.001). The incidence of perforation and bleeding was higher in the graft group than in the non-graft group (p<0.001), but infection did not significantly differ between groups (p>0.05). Compared to the graft group, the non-graft group showed lower postoperative bone height, gained bone height and apical bone height (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MSFE with and without bone grafts can significantly improve bone formation. In MSFE, the use of bone grafts hinders the formation of good quality bone, whereas the absence of bone grafts can generate good bone quality and limited bone mass.

Assessment of the intrasinusidal volume before and after maxillary sinus augmentation using mri - a pilot study of eight patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability, accuracy, and reliability of a non-invasive 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging technique (3 T-MRI) for the visualization of maxillary sinus grafts in comparison to conventional, X-ray-based, established standard imaging techniques. METHODS: A total of eight patients with alveolar bone atrophy who required surgical sinus floor augmentation in the course of dental implantation were included in this pilot study. Alongside pre-operative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), 3 T-MRI was performed before and 6 months after sinus floor augmentation. Two investigators measured the maxillary sinus volume preoperatively and after bone augmentation. RESULTS: In all cases, MRI demonstrated accurately the volumes of the maxillary sinus grafts. Following surgery, the bony structures suitable for an implant placement increased at an average of 4.89 cm3, corresponding with the decrease of the intrasinusidal volumes. In general, interexaminer discrepancies were low and without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, we could demonstrate the feasibility of MRI bone volume measurement as a radiation-free alternative with comparable accuracy to CT/CBCT before procedures like sinus floor augmentation. Nevertheless, costs and artifacts, also present in MRI, have to be taken into account. Larger studies will be necessary to justify the practicability of MRI bone volume evaluation.

Effectiveness, Morbidity, and Costs of Transcrestal and Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation at Sites with Different Residual Bone Heights: A Re-Analysis of Data from a Parallel-Arm Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To comparatively evaluate transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) and lateral sinus floor elevation (lSFE) at sites with different residual bone heights (RBHs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A re-analysis of data from a parallel-arm, randomized trial comparatively evaluating tSFE and lSFE was performed. Within each RBH interval (< 4 mm or ≥ 4 mm), tSFE and lSFE groups were compared for chair time, surgery-related costs, morbidity, and radiographic parameters (including the proportion of the implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area [totCON%]). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 29 and 28 patients in the tSFE and lSFE groups, respectively. Irrespective of RBH, both tSFE and lSFE lead to a median totCON% of 100%. At sites with RBH < 4 mm, pain severity was significantly higher at days 0 and 1 in the tSFE group, with no intergroup difference in the dose of analgesics. LSFE was associated with a significantly higher frequency of bruising and greater cost. At sites with RBH ≥ 4 mm, a significantly lower frequency of postoperative signs/symptoms, less chair time, and lower costs were observed in the tSFE group. CONCLUSIONS: The selection of tSFE or lSFE within the investigated RBH intervals seems to be supported by differences in chair time, costs, and morbidity between the two techniques. At sites with RBH < 4 mm, clinicians preferring tSFE should encourage the administration of analgesics according to a predefined plan in the early postoperative phase. At sites with RBH ≥ 4 mm, tSFE should be preferred to lSFE due to reduced chair time, costs, and morbidity.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using lateral window and crestal technique is considered as predictable methods to increase the residual bone height; however, this surgery is commonly complicated by Schneiderian membrane perforation, which is closely related to anatomical factors. This article aimed to assess anatomical factors on successful augmentation procedures. After review of the current evidence on sinus augmentation techniques, anatomical factors related to the stretching potential of Schneiderian membrane were assessed and a decision tree for the rational choice of surgical approaches was proposed. Schneiderian membrane perforation might occur when local tension exceeds its stretching potential, which is closely related to anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus. Choice of a surgical approach and clinical outcomes are influenced by the stretching potential of Schneiderian membrane. In addition to the residual bone height, clinicians should also consider the stretching potential affected by the membrane health condition, the contours of the maxillary sinus, and the presence of antral septa when evaluating the choice of surgical approaches and clinical outcomes.

Assessment of the relationships between posterior root apices and the maxillary sinus floor: a comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the apices of posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus floor, comparing the results of assessments performed with panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of 96 participants with a total of 302 maxillary posterior teeth. On both panoramic radiographs and corresponding CBCT images, 735 roots were classified into 3 categories according to their topographic relationship with the maxillary sinus: class 1, clear, distinct distance between the root tips and the floor of the sinus; class 2, roots adjacent to the floor of the maxillary sinus; or class 3, roots protruding into the maxillary sinus cavity. Panoramic radiographic signs of root protrusion into the sinus (class 3) were categorized as projection, discontinuity, missing lamina dura, darkening, or kinking. The observed data were analyzed using statistical software, and the Cohen κ coefficient was calculated. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the predictive radiographic signs of protrusion into the sinus. The overall correlations between panoramic radiography and CBCT classifications were 90.8%, 66.8%, and 47.1% for the class 1, class 2, and class 3 categories, respectively. The radiographic signs of projection and darkening were significant predictors of root protrusion (P < 0.05). Panoramic radiography is reliable for assessing root posi¬tions when there is a clear distance between the roots and the floor of the maxillary sinus. However, when the roots are in contact with or have protruded into the sinus on panoramic images, the results are not definitive, and CBCT should be performed.

Preliminary Assessment of In Vivo Raman Spectroscopy Technique for Bone Quality Evaluation of Augmented Maxillary Sinus Floor.

(1) Background: In oral surgery, bone regeneration is achieved through various types of bone grafts or bone substitutes and its success is usually analyzed by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Raman spectroscopy as an alternative to other techniques for bone quality evaluation during a standard oral surgery procedure. (2) Methods: The preliminary evaluation of bone augmentation during maxillary sinus floor elevation oral surgery was performed by Raman spectroscopy for several (five) patients during and after the surgery and the results were compared with postoperative data from histomorphometry, EDX and SEM analysis. (3) Results: After analyzing all the results for the bone samples according to the four methods (Raman, EDX, SEM and Histology) that were used in our study, the obtained result of the investigation provided a good augmentation process for three of the patients and partly successful augmentation process for two of the patients. The primary evaluation using Raman spectroscopy (in vivo and ex vivo investigation) was confirmed by histological results, thus having a first step for validation of Raman as a new method of imaging for dentistry. (4) Conclusions: Our results show that Raman spectroscopy could provide fast and reliable insight on bone condition during augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor. We emphasize the advantages and drawbacks of the proposed techniques as its accuracy could increase by performing larger size clinical trials. Using the Raman mapping, the method can serve as an alternative to histology.

Assessment of absorbable gelatin sponge for maxillary sinus floor elevation versus anorganic bovine bone minerals: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The present study compared the absorbable gelatin sponge as a space-filling material versus anorganic bone bovine mineral (ABBM) in maxillary sinus augmentation with simultaneous endosseous dental implant placement. METHODS: Eighteen maxillary sinus floor elevation cases were randomly allocated into two groups. The first group received ABBM, while the second group received an absorbable gelatin sponge as a space-filling material. For both groups, CBCT scans were obtained immediately postoperatively and six months later to calculate the difference in sinus floor bone gain. Osstell readings were recorded both at the time of implant placement and implant exposure with a total of twenty-three dental implant placements in relation to the eighteen elevated sinus floors. RESULTS: The mean radiographic sinus floor gain in the ABBM group was 10.2 mm (± 2.5), while in the absorbable gelatin sponge group was 5.4 mm (± 2.0), with a mean difference of 4.8, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean implant stability for the ABBM was 77.3 (± 4.9), while in the absorbable gelatin sponge group was 74.2 (± 3.0), with a mean difference of 3.1, which was statistically insignificant (p = 0.1610). CONCLUSION: The ABBM showed superior results regarding the amount of radiographic sinus floor bone gain. However, the implant stability was invariable between both groups.

Assessment of infrazygomatic crest dimensions in different vertical facial growth types for miniscrew insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the depth and height of the infrazygomatic crest (IZC) located in the posterior maxilla at the junction with the zygomatic process in patients with different vertical facial growth types as a potential miniscrew insertion site. METHODS: The sample consisted of cone-beam computed tomography scans of 117 patients (42 males and 75 females), with a mean age of 22.9 ± 2.7. The population was divided into 3 groups according to the measured SN-GoGn angle: Decreased facial proportions (n = 28), average facial proportions (n = 62), and increased facial proportions (n = 27). Bone depth was assessed at 5 levels: apex, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm vertically from the apex. The measurements were performed on the mesiobuccal and distobuccal roots of the first molar and the mesiobuccal root of the second molar. Repeated-measure analysis of variance followed by univariates analyses and Bonferroni multiple comparisons were performed to compare the mean bone thickness between groups. The IZC height was assessed through a vertical line ranging from the furcation of the maxillary first molar to the sinus floor. Analysis of variance followed by Tukey (honestly significant difference) post-hoc tests was used to compare the mean height between groups. RESULTS: Mean bone depth between the 3 groups were significantly different at the mesiobuccal root region of the first molar at all the measured levels. It was smaller for average, intermediate for decreased, and elevated for increased facial proportions. No statistical difference was shown at the distobuccal root of the first molar except for the apex level and the mesiobuccal root of the second molar except for the apex and 4 mm levels. The mean bone height was significantly different between subjects with increased facial proportions and the 2 other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with increased facial proportions tend to present a longer and deeper IZC followed by decreased facial proportions, then average facial proportions.

Elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto y colocación simultánea de implante dental / Graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implant placement

Introducción: La elevación de seno maxilar con implante dental simultáneo, sin el uso de substitutos óseos, ha retomado la teoría del potencial de neoformación ósea, que el coágulo de sangre alojado bajo la membrana de Schneider por sí solo presenta. Excluyendo así la necesidad de materiales exógenos. Objetivo: Exponer la efectividad de la elevación de seno maxilar con implante dental simultáneo, sin el uso de injerto, mediante la evaluación de la cantidad de ganancia ósea vertical. Presentación de casos: Caso 1: Paciente de 62 años, género femenino, que fue sometida a una elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto e implante dental simultáneo, con técnica de ventana lateral debido a altura ósea reducida de 5,24 mm. Luego del período de seguimiento tomográfico de 12 meses, después de la carga protésica, se logró una altura ósea vertical de 10,2 mm, lo que dio como resultado una ganancia ósea vertical de 4,96 mm. Caso 2: Paciente de 48 años, género femenino, que fue sometida a una elevación de seno maxilar sin injerto e implante dental simultáneo, con técnica transalveolar, mediante el uso de piezoeléctrico debido a una altura ósea reducida de 8,33 mm. Luego del período de seguimiento radiográfico de 4 meses, antes de la carga protésica, se logró una altura ósea vertical de 11,55 mm, lo que dio como resultado una ganancia ósea vertical de 3,19 mm. Conclusiones: Con base en estos 2 informes de casos, la elevación de seno maxilar e implante dental simultáneo sin injerto se asocian con la reducción de la morbilidad quirúrgica, menor probabilidad de procesos infecciosos y menor costo de la cirugía. Por lo tanto, puede considerarse una alternativa quirúrgica para la colocación de implantes en el maxilar posterior superior debido a deficiencias óseas verticales, independientemente de la técnica (lateral o transalveolar(AU)

Introduction: Maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation without using bone substitutes, reapproaches the theory about the bone neoformation potential of the blood clot housed under the Schneider membrane, all by itself, thus excluding the need to use exogenous materials. Objective: Discuss the effectiveness of graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implant placement through an evaluation of the amount of vertical bone gain. Case presentation: Case 1: Female 62-year-old patient undergoing graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation by lateral window technique due to a reduced bone height of 5.24 mm. After a 12-month tomographic follow-up period subsequent to prosthetic loading, a 10.2 mm vertical bone height was achieved, resulting in 4.96 mm vertical bone gain. Case 2: Female 48-year-old patient undergoing graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous dental implantation by transalveolar technique using a piezoelectric generator due to a reduced bone height of 8.33 mm. After a 4-month radiographic follow-up period, before prosthetic loading, an 11.55 mm vertical bone height was achieved, resulting in 3.19 mm vertical bone gain. Conclusions: According to these two case reports, graftless maxillary sinus lifting with simultaneous dental implantation is associated to reduced surgical morbidity, a lesser probability of infectious processes and lower surgical costs. It may therefore be considered to be a surgical alternative for implant placement in the posterior maxilla due to vertical bone deficiencies, regardless of the technique used (lateral or transalveolar(AU)

Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different skeletal classes limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the anatomical relationship between the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) and the posterior maxillary teeth (PMT) is important when planning the orthodontic intrusion of the posterior teeth. This study aimed to determine the vertical relationship between posterior maxillary teeth and maxillary sinus floor in different skeletal classes in the Chinese adult population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involved cone beam computed tomography images of 298 adult patients (145 males and 153 females) between 20 and 45 years old. The sample was categorized according to A point, Nasion, B point (ANB) angle into 102 Class I, 102 Class II, and 94 Class III malocclusion. Non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the studied groups. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean distance between both genders (P < 0.001). The measured distance increased with age in all posterior tooth roots (P < 0.001). The root apex in the sagittal view appeared to be closer to the maxillary sinus than in the coronal view; 2.2 ± 4.3 and 3.1 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. The most frequent root scores were Type 1 and Type 2P. In both sagittal and coronal views, Class I demonstrated a higher Type 2P prevalence, whereas Class III showed a lower prevalence. The second molars' mesiobuccal root had the largest number of penetration in the three examined skeletal classes. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molars of Class I malocclusion with the majority of Type 2P root-sinus relationship have the highest possible risk of root resorption during molar intrusion due to cortical bone encroachment, while Class III malocclusion showed the least possible risk.

Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different facial patterns limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior teeth intrusion is one of the best treatment options for treatment of skeletal open bite in adults; the surrounding anatomical landmarks are one of the restraining factors. This study aimed to assess the vertical relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth (MPT) and the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) in different facial growth patterns in the Chinese adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography images of 298 patients, 145 males and 153 females aged between 20 and 45 years, were analyzed. Based on Jarabak ratio and the mandibular plane inclination, the sample was categorized into 94 hyperdivergent, 102 hypodivergent, and 102 normodivergent facial patterns subjects. The vertical relationship between the root-apex distances were classified as favorable, indicating no contact (type 1), or unfavorable, indicating roots in contact (type 2) for the posterior teeth intrusion. The relationship in the unfavorable group was subdivided into three subgroups (T2C, T2LC, and T2P). Comparative statistical tests were done related to age, gender, tooth side, and type of multiplanar view (sagittal and coronal). The significant level was set to be P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean distance between both genders in the hyperdivergent group (P < 0.001). The measured distance increased with age in all tooth roots (P < 0.001). In both sagittal and coronal views, the most frequent root scores were type 1 and type 2p (54.2%, 27.5%) and (55.1%, 21.4%), respectively. The hyperdivergent group demonstrated a higher prevalence of type 2P (31.6% and 25.5%), whereas the hypodivergent group showed a lower prevalence (25.1% and 19.2%); furthermore, the second molar's mesiobuccal root in hyperdivergent patients showed the closest distance to the maxillary sinus in sagittal and coronal views, 0.3 ± 3.7 and 0.4 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molars of hyperdivergent patients have the highest possible risk of root resorption due to the possible risk of cortical bone encroachment, while hypodivergent patients have the least possible risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Analysis of apex-sinus distances can be of great help for safe posterior teeth intrusion and providing correct and adequate treatment.

[Topographic assessment of the vascular anastomosis in the maxillary sinus wall using cone-beam computed tomography]. / Topografiya sosudistogo anastomoza v stenke verkhnechelyustnoi pazukhi po dannym konusno-luchevoi komp'yuternoi tomografii.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to establish the prevalence, diameter and topography of the intraosseous vascular canal of the maxillary sinus lateral wall. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of cone-beam computed tomography of 150 dental patients (294 maxillary sinuses) were analyzed. RESULTS: Intraosseus anastomosis of the branches of the posterior superior alveolar artery and infraorbital artery was detected in 87.8% of cases (258 of 294 sinuses). Anastomosis was found inside the wall of the sinus in every tooth location in 9.5% of sinuses; in other cases, the anastomosis was partially or fully embedded in the thickness of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus in different tooth site. The mean diameter of the vascular anastomosis was 0.95±0.3 mm (range 0.3-2.18 mm). The average distance from the anastomosis to the sinus floor was 8.91±3.39 mm (range 1.68-21.83mm). In most cases, at locations of molars and premolars, the distance from the vascular anastomosis to the alveolar crest was greater than 15 mm (from 75.5% at the location of the first molar to 99.2% at the location of the first premolar). CONCLUSION: Detection of the topography of the vascular anastomosis by using cone-beam computed tomography is essential when planning the position of the antrostomy for the lateral sinus lift procedure in order to minimize iatrogenic complications.

Radiographic assessment of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and collagen-stabilized DBBM for transalveolar sinus floor elevation: A 2-year retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, collagen-stabilized deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM-C) has better operability compared with DBBM. DBBM-C avoids dispersing during the transalveolar sinus floor elevation (TSFE) because of its block shape. PURPOSE: To evaluate radiological changes of using DBBM-C in TSFE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received TSFE using DBBM (Bio-Oss®) or DBBM-C (Bio-Oss® collagen) with simultaneous implantation were recruited. Graft bone height apically (aGH), endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), and crest bone level (CBL) were assessed through panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (138 implants) were retrospectively enrolled. After 2 years of implantation, the incidence of postoperative complications was 4.2% (95% CI: 0.9%-11.7%) and 4.5% (95% CI: 0.9%-12.7%) for DBBM and DBBM-C groups, respectively. Measured in panoramic radiograph, ΔaGH of DBBM-C (1.8 mm, SD: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4, P = 0.044) group was significantly higher than that of DBBM (1.2 mm, SD: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7-1.7) after 24 months. No significant differences for ΔCBL were noted during the entire observation period. Measured through CBCT, ESBG was 5.0 (SD: 1.8, 95% CI: 4.1-5.8) mm in DBBM group and 4.6 (SD: 1.6, 95% CI: 3.9-5.3) mm in DBBM-C group 24 months after implantation. The aGH value of DBBM-C group was significantly higher compared with DBBM in CBCT (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.9, P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: DBBM-C could achieve similar bone generation as DBBM in TSFE. Both materials could maintain aGH, ESBG, and CBL relatively stable 2 years after implantation.

Implant-supported rehabilitation following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: analysis of costs and quality of life from a bicenter, parallel-arm randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate costs and specific aspects of oral-health related quality of life (OhRQoL) related to the period between the surgery phase of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation (tSFE and lSFE, respectively) and 6 months after delivery of implant-supported prosthesis. METHODS: A bicenter, parallel-arm, randomized trial comparatively evaluating tSFE and lSFE when applied concomitantly with implant placement was conducted. At 6 months after prosthesis delivery, data on cost-associated items related to the post-surgery period and selected aspects of OhRQoL were collected. RESULTS: Analyses of costs and quality of life was conducted on 56 patients (tSFE: 28; lSFE: 28) and 54 patients (tSFE: 26; lSFE: 28), respectively. Significantly lower dose of anesthetic (2 vs. 3 vials), amount of xenograft (420 mg vs. 1975 mg), and duration of surgery (54' vs. 86') were observed for tSFE compared to lSFE. No significant differences in the number of additional surgical sessions, postoperative exams, specialist consultations and drug consumption were found between groups. In a limited fraction of patients in both groups, improvements were observed for pain (tSFE: 3.8%; lSFE: 7.4%), comfort in eating any food (tSFE: 11.5%; lSFE: 3.6%), self-consciousness (tSFE: 19.2%; lSFE: 14.3%), and satisfaction about life (tSFE: 19.2%; lSFE: 10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The surgery phase of maxillary sinus floor elevation is characterized by more favorable cost-associated items for tSFE compared to lSFE. Differently, tSFE and lSFE do not differ for either costs related to the post-surgery phases or impact of the implant-supported rehabilitation on specific aspects of OhRQoL.

Histologic and Immunohistochemical Assessment of the Effect of Various Biomaterials on New Bone Formation in the Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Procedure.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of different kinds of biomaterials placed with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) on bone regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six New Zealand rabbits were used in the study. A standardized method of surgical approach was used for MSFA under anesthesia in all groups. The procedure was performed for each animal. Six separate groups with 12 cases were created. In group 1, no graft was used in MSFA. Advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), absorbable collagen cone (ACC), venous blood, the combination of ACC and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and the combination of ACC and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) were used in groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. At the end of 4 and 12 weeks, three rabbits from each group were sacrificed by applying high-dose anesthetic, and samples were examined histologically and immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Groups 2 and 5 showed significantly increased new bone formation compared with groups 1 and 4, 4 weeks after MSFA (P < .05). Twelve weeks after sinus floor augmentation, groups 2, 3, 5, and 6 showed significantly higher new bone formation than group 1 (P < .05). Groups 2 and 5 showed significantly higher hard tissue response than groups 1 and 4 at the end of 4 weeks (P < .05). Groups 5 and 6 demonstrated significantly higher hard tissue response than group 1 at the end of 12 weeks (P < .05). Group 5 also showed significantly higher hard tissue response than group 4 at the end of 12 weeks (P < .05). Immunohistochemical analysis showed a significant difference between the osteocalcin scores of groups 2 and 4 and group 1 at the end of 4 and 12 weeks (P < .05). There was also a statistically significant difference between osteocalcin scores at 4 and 12 weeks for groups 1 and 5 (P < .05). When osteopontin scores were compared, there was no significant difference between groups at 4 and 12 weeks (P > .05). Groups 1, 2, and 5 showed significant changes in osteopontin scores between 4 and 12 weeks (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The combination of ACC and PRP and the combination of ACC and EMD showed increased new bone formation and hard tissue response. A-PRF also showed promising results in new bone formation at the end of both 4 and 12 weeks. The usage of ACC as a carrier for liquid-form biomaterials may be more beneficial than the usage of ACC alone.

Topographic Assessment of Calcified Material After Sinus Floor Augmentation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to topographically examine the healing of mineralized human bone allograft in sinus augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with crestal bone height ≤ 2 mm who required sinus augmentation were recruited for the study. A mixture of 80/20 cortical/cancellous mineralized human bone allografts were used to augment the sinus floor using a crestal window approach. A bone core biopsy specimen was taken at the time of implant placement, 6 months after surgery. Microradiographs of methacrylate-embedded sections were split into five longitudinal sectors (crestal to sinusal) to topographically assess the bone, graft, and fibrous tissue amount. RESULTS: All implants were osseointegrated 3 months later without any adverse effects. The polynomial (degree 2) of results (all with great correlation coefficient, P < .01) gave rise to a polynomial curve of graft percentage with a maximum at sector 4 (presinusal), a bone percentage with a minimum between sectors 3 and 4, and a fibrous tissue percentage with a maximum between sectors 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: Based upon topographic analysis, mineralized human bone allograft is capable of achieving adequate vertical bone height for implant placement. The need for a topographic analysis to assess the outcomes of sinus augmentation is emphasized.

Short vs standard implants associated with sinus floor elevation: a randomized controlled trial / Implantes curtos versus implantes convencionais associados à elevação do seixo maxilar: um ensaio clínico randomizado

Objective: the present equivalence two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial aimed to compare survival and marginal bone loss (MBL) of short implants (≤6 mm) and standard implants (≥8.5 mm) associated with sinus floor elevation (SFE). Methods: adult patients with partial edentulism with occlusal stability in the sinus area and intermediate bone height were selected in this double-blind trial (patient and outcome assessment). Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: standard length implants with SFE (control) or short implants (test). Clinical and radiographic assessments were made at the time of implant placement, 6 months, and annually thereafter up to 2 years after loading. The inter-examiner agreement was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). One-way ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Log-rank tests were used to compare implant survival (primary outcome) and MBL (secondary outcome) (P<0.05). Results: eight short implants and six standard implants were placed (mean age of patients was 47 ±12.5 years). The implant survival rates were 87.5% for short (one 5 mm implant failed at 7 months) and 100% for standard implants with no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.4). The mean MBL after 1 year was 0.30 ±0.62 mm for short and 0.21 ±0.36 mm for standard implants (P=0.123). The inter-examiner agreement was set in 0.831. Conclusion: survival of short implants and standard implants associated with SFE was similar after two years of clinical service. Trial registration: Registered on 27-03-2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03479333). Funding: This study was partially funded by Capes Finance Code 001 and #88881.187933/2018-01. TPC is partially funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Brazil). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.(AU)

Objetivo: o presente ensaio clínico randomizado de dois braços de equivalência comparou a taxa de sobrevivência e a perda óssea marginal de implantes curtos (≤ 6 mm) e implantes convencionais (≥ 8.5 mm) associados à elevação do seio maxilar. Métodos: edêntulos parciais adultos, com estabilidade oclusal e altura óssea intermediária na região do seio maxilar, foram selecionados neste estudo duplo-cego e alocados randomicamente em dois grupos: implante de comprimento convencional associado à elevação do seio maxilar (controle) ou implante curto (teste). Avaliações clínicas e radiográficas foram realizadas logo após a instalação do implante, seis meses e anualmente por até dois anos. A concordância interexaminador foi avaliada através do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse. Os testes ANOVA de uma via, Kaplan-Meier e Log-rank foram utilizados para comparar a sobrevivência do implante e a perda óssea marginal (P<0.05). Resultados: oito implantes curtos e seis implantes de comprimento convencional foram instalados em onze pacientes (média de idade dos pacientes: 47 ± 12.5 anos). As taxas de sobrevivência dos implantes foram de 87,5% para implantes curtos (um implante de 5 mm falhou aos sete meses), e 100% para implantes convencionais, sem diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (P=0.4). A perda óssea marginal média após um ano foi de 0.30 ±0.62 mm para implantes curtos e 0.21 ±0.36 mm para implantes convencionais (P=0.123). A concordância interexaminador foi de 0.831. Conclusão: a taxa de sobrevivência de implantes curtos e convencionais associados ao seio maxilar foi semelhante após dois anos de acompanhamento. Registro do estudo: Registrado em 27-03-2018 no ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03479333).(AU)

The assessment of the effect of the size of lateral-antrostomy in graftless balloon elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane with simultaneous implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial).

BACKGROUND: The overlying maxillary sinus frequently restrains the height of the posterior maxillary bones. PURPOSE: Evaluating the effect of downsizing the antrostomy side-window on the stability of the installed implants and vertical bone gain, after employing a graftless antral membrane balloon elevation (AMBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted on 20 patients with 30 deficient maxillary alveolar ridges underwent graftless (AMBE) after being allocated into a (5 mm) entry antrostomy group (the test group) and a (10 mm) entry antrostomy group (the control group) implementing a radiographic linear bone height and implant stability quotations (ISQ) comparison among both groups immediately after the placement of 38 Implants and 6 months after. RESULTS: Radiographic bone gain of the test group (5.55 ± 0.93 mm) was significantly higher than the control group (2.86 ± 0.60 mm) (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in primary stability between the test (65 ± 5.32) and control groups (62.67 ± 4.46) (p = 0.202); while the test group (73.43 ± 4.39) showed significantly higher secondary stability than the control group (64.83 ± 6.05) (p <0.001). ISQ values recorded at 6 months were significantly higher than those recorded at insertion in the test group (p <0.001), while they were insignificant in the control group (p = 0.148). CONCLUSION: Undersizing the antrostomy window deemed beneficial concerning the vertical bone gain and the simultaneously placed root form dental implants' secondary stability.