Oncological outcome, functional results and costs after unplanned excision of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) should only be initiated once the diagnosis is fully established. Resection of tumors of unknown nature should be avoided. Nevertheless, specialized centers continue to face numbers of unplanned excisions (UPE) in STS. AIM: To compare oncologic and functional outcomes, number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs of UPE versus planned excision (PE) in STS. METHOD: A retrospective single tertiary center study was performed on 201 patients. Survival, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between PE (n = 137) and UPE (n = 64). In a subgroup analysis of 60 patients, functional outcome (MSTS and TESS scores), and socio-economic impact (number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs) in "functional planned excision" (fPE) group (n = 30) and "functional unplanned excision" (fUPE) group (n = 29) were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in oncological outcome between PE and UPE. In the subgroup analysis, we found a non-significant difference in functional outcome. Patients in the fUPE had significantly more surgeries (3.5 vs. 1.4; p < 0.00001) and costs of their management was 64% higher than fPE (p = 0.048). Hospital stay was longer after fUPE but not statistically significant (18.3 days vs. 11.8 days; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Even though oncological and functional outcomes are comparable after PE and UPE of STS, the number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs were higher in patients with UPE. Our data underscore the importance of specialized STS treatment centers including multidisciplinary management.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours.

BACKGROUND: Deep lipomatous tumours can be benign lipomas or intermediate/locally recurring atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs). Differentiating between these two entities clinically and radiologically is difficult. The aims of this study were to report a series of deep lipomatous tumours, comparing the clinical, radiological and pathological features of ALTs and lipomas; and to predict the likelihood of a lipomatous tumour being ALT based on anatomical site and MRI characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with deep lipomatous tumours presenting over 6 years to a tertiary sarcoma centre, with preoperative MRI, and preoperative or postoperative histology including MDM2 gene analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy in diagnosing ALT were calculated for MRI and histopathological features. RESULTS: Some 248 patients were included; 81 (32·7 per cent) had a final diagnosis of ALT. ALTs were larger than lipomas (median 19 versus 10 cm; P < 0·001); there was no ALT smaller than 5 cm. A tumour presenting in the lower limb was more likely to be an ALT than a lesion at any other site (48·4 versus 13·5 per cent; P < 0·001). In patients with lipomatous tumours at sites other than the lower limbs, MRI had a negative predictive value of 95 per cent for excluding ALT. CONCLUSION: Despite concern, most deep lipomatous tumours (nearly 70 per cent) are benign lipomas. Certain features imply that tumours are almost never ALT: smaller than 5 cm or located outside the lower limb with no suspicious characteristics on MRI. Tumours with these features might safely and confidently be managed outside tertiary sarcoma centres.

ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores lipomatosos profundos pueden ser lipomas benignos o tumores lipomatosos atípicos (atypical lipomatous tumour, ALT) con potencial de recidiva local/intermedia. Diferenciar estas dos entidades desde el punto de vista clínico es difícil. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron presentar una gran serie de tumores lipomatosos profundos, comparando las características clínicas, radiológicas y patológicas de los ALT y de los lipomas y predecir la probabilidad de que un tumor lipomatoso sea ALT según su localización anatómica y las características de la RNM. MÉTODOS: Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con tumores lipomatosos profundos tratados en un centro terciario de sarcoma durante un período de 6 años, en los que se dispusiese de RNM preoperatoria y análisis MDM2 en el preoperatorio o postoperatorio. Se calculó la sensibilidad, la especificidad, el valor predictivo y la precisión diagnóstica de la RNM y de las características histopatológicas para el diagnóstico de ALT. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 248 pacientes, de los que en solo 81 (32,7%) se estableció un diagnóstico final de ALT. Los ALT fueron más grandes que los lipomas (19 versus 10 cm, P < 0,001) y no hubo ningún ALT de tamaño menor de 5 cm. Hubo una mayor probabilidad de que un tumor fuera ALT si se presentaba en las extremidades inferiores en comparación con cualquier otra localización (48,4% versus 13,5%, P < 0,001). En pacientes con tumores lipomatosos localizados en otros lugares que no fueran las extremidades inferiores, la RMN tuvo un valor predictivo negativo del 95,5% para excluir la ALT. CONCLUSIÓN: A pesar del recelo tradicional, la mayoría (70%) de los tumores lipomatosos profundos son lipomas benignos. Algunas características, como los tumores de menos de 5 cm y aquellos ubicados fuera de las extremidades inferiores sin características sospechosas por RNM, indican que los tumores casi nunca son ALT. Los tumores con esas características pueden tratarse de manera segura y con solvencia fuera de los centros de sarcomas terciarios. En casos seleccionados, puede ser útil la prueba genética MDM2 en la biopsia.

Histologic Appearance After Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Assessment of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Response Score.

PURPOSE: To critically assess the prognostic value of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) response score and define histologic appearance after preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For a cohort of 100 patients with STS of the extremity/trunk treated at our institution with preoperative RT followed by resection, 2 expert sarcoma pathologists evaluated the resected specimens for percent residual viable cells, necrosis, hyalinization/fibrosis, and infarction. The EORTC response score and other predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 7.5 cm; 92% were intermediate or high grade. Most common histologies were unclassified sarcoma (34%) and myxofibrosarcoma (25%). Median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5%, 5-year RFS was 68%, and 5-year OS was 75%. Distribution of cases according to EORTC response score tiers was as follows: no residual viable tumor for 9 cases (9% pathologic complete response); <1% viable tumor for 0, ≥1% to <10% for 9, ≥10% to <50% for 44, and ≥50% for 38. There was no association between EORTC-STBSG response score and RFS or OS. Conversely, hyalinization/fibrosis was a significant independent favorable predictor for RFS (hazard ratio 0.49, P=.007) and OS (hazard ratio 0.36, P=.02). CONCLUSION: Histologic evaluation after preoperative RT for STS showed a 9% pathologic complete response rate. The EORTC-STBSG response score and percent viable cells were not prognostic. Hyalinization/fibrosis was associated with favorable outcome, and if validated, may become a valid endpoint for neoadjuvant trials.

Clinicopathological assessment of T1 soft tissue sarcomas.

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have identified factors prognostic for soft tissue sarcomas of local recurrence, and distant metastasis. Several studies demonstrated that some subsets of patients could be safely treated by surgery alone, with acceptable rates of local recurrence. The aim of this study was to better clarify the necessity for adjuvant therapy and the width of the resected margin, by investigating the clinicopathological results of T1 (≤5 cm) soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in 96 adult patients treated for nonmetastatic AJCC T1 primary non-small round cell soft tissue sarcomas in our institution from 1995 to 2008. There were 49 men and 47 women ranging in age from 18 to 85 years (mean 51), and the observation period was 6-159 months (mean 52). The site of origin was the upper extremity in 21 cases, the lower extremity in 45, and the trunk in 30. Forty-four cases had high-grade malignant tumors, and 52 had low-grade malignant ones. Tumor size ranged from 0.7 to 5.0 cm (median size, 3.5 cm). Thirty-nine cases (41%) had previously undergone unplanned excision elsewhere. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (93%) of the patients were continuously free of disease, four were alive and currently free of disease, one was alive with metastasis, and two had died. The event-free survival rate at 5 years was 93.3%. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 94.1%. In 23 of the 45 cases with unplanned excisions (51%) residual tumor was found on histological examination. After definitive surgery, 92 patients (96%) had R0 margins. Four patients (4%) had R1 margins and were treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Forty-five of 51 cases after planned biopsies (88%) showed infiltrative growth microscopically. CONCLUSION: Tumor size was found to have a major impact on the prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas, emphasizing the importance of early detection and early treatment of these tumors. Most patients suffering from T1 soft tissue sarcomas might be able to avoid adjuvant therapies including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. To achieve good local control with surgery alone, an adequate surgical margin must be achieved even for small lesions.

Cost analysis of functional restoration surgery for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Limb-sparing surgery, consisting of wide-margin tumor resection and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy, has become the surgical treatment of choice for extremity sarcomas. However, adequate tumor resection can sometimes compromise crucial limb function, necessitating functional restoration surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost impact and functional outcomes of such procedures. METHODS: Patients receiving either functional restoration surgery or soft-tissue-only reconstruction following extremity soft-tissue sarcoma excision were identified. Patients were then compared along several dimensions: overall length of stay and its subdivisions, surgical time, and total charges and its subdivisions. Patients' functional outcomes were assessed with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients who underwent 69 limb-sparing procedures were identified. Fifteen of these procedures (eight upper extremity, seven lower extremity) required functional restoration surgery; 54 of these procedures (13 upper extremity, 41 lower extremity) required only soft-tissue coverage. In the upper extremity, there was a statistically significant increase in overall length of stay (2.8 days) and its subdivisions, surgical time (3.7 hours), and total charges (12,484 dollars) and its subdivisions associated with performing functional restoration surgery. In lower extremity cases, statistically significant increases were determined in only the total charges (9190 dollars) and medical supply charges (13,204 dollars) following functional restoration. Patients who underwent functional restoration surgery had better postoperative function (mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, 82 versus 80), but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although functional restoration surgery is more costly than soft-tissue reconstruction alone, the authors believe that the associated better functional outcome justifies its performance.

Assessment of non-invasive new imaging techniques in the diagnosis of heart liposarcoma.

Two patients, with recurrent acute pericarditis as the first presentation of liposarcoma, were admitted to our department between August and December 1992. The pericarditis was pericardial in one case and retroperitoneal with pericardial inflammation in the other. In contrast to most reported cases, where diagnosis was made post-mortem, diagnosis and surgical decision were based on non-invasive imaging techniques, without cardiac angiography. In cases of recurrent acute pericarditis resistant to usual drugs, new imaging techniques, such as computed tomodensitometry and magnetic resonance imaging, can detect rare causes such as liposarcomas in which prognosis is critically dependent on early diagnosis.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas: pre-operative assessment and surgical therapy.

The clinical and pathological records of 22 patients treated for retroperitoneal sarcomas were retrospectively studied. The initial symptoms were pain and swelling of the abdomen in 11 patients. All tumours had a diameter of more than 10 cm. The pathological diagnosis was in 16 cases liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma. Fourteen tumours were graded as high and eight as low. Sixteen of the 22 operated patients had complete resection of the tumour. Eleven patients had recurrence after five to 42 months, nine of them local recurrence and two distant metastases. Eleven patients needed repeated radical or palliative resections. Additional therapy (pre- or post-operative radiation or chemotherapy) was given to 11 patients. Radical resection of primary and recurrent tumours seems to give the best results in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas but debulking of the tumour improves the quality of life in selected patients.