Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 183
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 49(6): 566-572, 2024 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173274

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Schools with formal sun safety polices generally show better sun safety practices than schools without. OBJECTIVES: To understand the extent to which Welsh primary schools have sun safety policies; to identify the key characteristics of policies; to assess whether policy adoption varies by school characteristics; and to consider what support schools need to develop sun safety policies. METHODS: An online multiple-choice survey on sun safety was distributed to all 1241 primary schools in Wales. RESULTS: In total, 471 (38.0%) schools responded. Of these, 183 (39.0%) reported having a formal sun safety policy. Welsh medium schools (P = 0.036) and schools in North Wales (P = 0.008) were more likely to report having a policy. Schools with a higher percentage of pupils receiving free school meals (P = 0.046) and with lower attendance rates (P = 0.008) were less likely to report having a sun safety policy. The primary reasons for schools not having a policy included being 'not aware of the need' (34.6%); 'need assistance with policy or procedure development' (30.3%); and 'not got around to it just yet' (26.8%). CONCLUSIONS: With less than half of schools reporting a sun safety policy and variation in the presence/absence of a policy by school characteristics, our survey revealed inconsistency in formal sun safety provision in Welsh schools. The findings also suggest that schools are unaware of the importance of sun safety and need support to develop and implement policies. This snapshot of the current situation in primary schools in Wales provides a basis upon which the comprehensiveness, effectiveness and implementation of sun safety policies can be further evaluated.


Assuntos
Instituições Acadêmicas , País de Gales , Humanos , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Protetores Solares/uso terapêutico , Roupa de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/normas
3.
Health Phys ; 125(5): 338-351, 2023 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês, Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584567

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: A quantitative assessment of the blue light hazard for the human eye related to direct solar irradiation is presented. For six radiation situations, missing eye protection was compared to protection by nine different commercial sunglasses with and without an optimized blue light filter. Measurements of the solar irradiance were performed on Earth's surface as well as at an elevation of 12 km in the cockpit of an airliner. An irradiation time limit was calculated from the measurement data, within which the maximum blue light dose of 100 J m -2 , recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and mandatory for the safe operation of lamps according to the norm ICE 62471, is reached. The results suggest that the blue light dose limit is violated within less than 3 s when looking without eye protection directly into the sun. For Category 3 sunglasses without the optimized blue light filter, time limits of 10 to 25 s on Earth's surface and 7 to 8 s at 12 km altitude were observed. The investigated Category 3 sunglasses with optimized blue light protection and suited for traffic use allow a time limit of more than 40 s on Earth's surface and 18 to 95 s in the airliner's cockpit. The outcome of the study is that the eye protection against blue light hazard related to solar radiation can be quantified using existing limits and that the choice of sunglasses is relevant: Traffic-worthy sunglasses optimized for protection against blue light hazard offer a better protection than non-optimized sunglasses.


Assuntos
Luz , Raios Ultravioleta , Humanos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Olho/efeitos da radiação , Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos
4.
Curr Probl Dermatol ; 55: 157-169, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698042

RESUMO

In 1978, the FDA Advisory Panel proposed both indoor and natural sunlight SPF testing methods but reverted to indoor testing only in 1993. Today's sunscreen sun protection and broad-spectrum claims are based on mandated clinical tests using solar simulators and in vitro spectrophotometers. This research evaluated the protection of 10 high-SPF (30-110), broad-spectrum sunscreen products, as well as 6 sun-protective fabrics against natural sunlight in Arequipa, Peru. Each of the 17 subjects was exposed to natural sunlight for 1 h and 59 min under clear skies, with temperatures and humidity similar to those in an indoor clinical laboratory. Test sites were photographed 16-24 h later. Four dermatologists evaluated the photographs for erythema and persistent pigment darkening (PPD). Perceptible sun-induced skin injury (sunburn and/or pigmentation) was detected at 97% of the sunscreen-protected scores. The most sun-sensitive subjects obtained the least erythema protection. The higher the SPF was, the higher the erythema protection, but the intensity of PPD was also higher. The 2 sunscreens using only FDA-approved sunscreen filters rated 30 SPF and 45+ SPF performed poorly: Eighty-one percent of the 136 scores were graded 1 minimal erythema dose or higher erythema, achieving, at a maximum, SPF of 5-7 in natural sunlight. Sun-protective fabrics tested provided excellent sun protection. The erythema and PPD observed through the sunscreens in less than 2 h are incongruous with the broad-spectrum, high-SPF sunscreen claims. Reapplying these sunscreens and staying in the sun longer, as stated on the product labels, would have subjected the subjects to even more UV exposure. High-SPF, broad-spectrum sunscreen claims based on indoor solar simulator testing do not agree with the natural sunlight protection test results.


Assuntos
Roupa de Proteção/normas , Fator de Proteção Solar/métodos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Protetores Solares/química , Têxteis/normas , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/normas , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Peru , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Fator de Proteção Solar/normas , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Protetores Solares/normas
5.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 125: 105017, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34311056

RESUMO

A cross-industry survey was conducted by EFPIA/IQ DruSafe in 2018 to provide information on photosafety evaluation of pharmaceuticals after implementation of ICH S10. This survey focused on the strategy utilized for photosafety risk assessment, the design of nonclinical (in vitro and in vivo) and clinical evaluations, the use of exposure margins in risk assessment, and regulatory interactions. The survey results indicated that a staged approach for phototoxicity assessment has been widely accepted by regulatory authorities globally. The OECD-based 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test is the most frequently used in vitro approach. Modifications to this assay suggested by ICH S10 are commonly applied. For in-vitro-positives, substantial margins from in vitro IC50 values under irradiation to Cmax (clinical) have enabled further development without the need for additional photosafety data. In vivo phototoxicity studies typically involve dosing rodents and exposing skin and eyes to simulated sunlight, and subsequently evaluating at least the skin for erythema and edema. However, no formal guidelines exist and protocols are less standardized across companies. A margin-of-safety approach (based on Cmax at NOAEL) has been successfully applied to support clinical development. Experience with dedicated clinical phototoxicity studies was limited, perhaps due to effective de-risking approaches employed based on ICH S10.


Assuntos
Dermatite Fototóxica/patologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico/normas , Preparações Farmacêuticas/normas , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
7.
Hautarzt ; 71(10): 772-785, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915242

RESUMO

The sun is of great importance for human health. One important reason for this is the production of vitamin D, endorphins and many other hormones by the skin due to stimulation by sunlight. Insufficient access to sunlight increases the risk for vitamin D deficiency, a pandemic which would affect more than one billion people worldwide and under which ca. 60% of the population in Germany would suffer. The skin has a unique position in vitamin D metabolism as elementary steps for vitamin D production take place here and it is furthermore a target organ for actions of vitamin D. Due to the many positive effects of the sun, a healthy balance must be found between UV protection to shield against skin cancer but also ensuring sufficient vitamin D production. For regulation of this fragile balance between photoprotection and vitamin D production, which has accompanied mankind throughout evolution, sunscreens are an integral part of the modern lifestyle, although critical reports on possible risks for their use have recently become more frequent. This article discusses the current state of knowledge on the importance of vitamin D metabolism in human skin and the use of sun creams.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Alemanha , Humanos , Protetores Solares , Terapia Ultravioleta , Deficiência de Vitamina D
8.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis ; 37(5): 807-812, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32400714

RESUMO

Melanoma is the severest type of skin cancer. As distinct from many other cancer types, the incidence of melanoma has been increasing steadily over the last century. Discovering new risk factors of melanoma will not only raise public awareness but also potentially contribute to the improvement of skin cancer protection in the future. Nowadays, the tendency of shaving skin hair is becoming increasingly popular for aesthetic purposes. However, human hair serves several functions, one of which is ultraviolet (UV) protection for the skin. What is more, stem cells found in the follicles of hair could be the origin of melanoma upon exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the effect of shaving on solar UV transmission in the skin. To achieve that, two groups of skin models are constructed in TracePro software: one with unaltered hair and one with shaved hair. The UV transport in the models is simulated using the Monte Carlo method and the absorptions in the stem cells layer are compared. It is found that shaving will increase the UV transmission to the follicular stem cells to a certain degree. More specifically, shaving limbs will generally increase the solar UV transmission from about 5% to 20% in the UV wavelength range.


Assuntos
Remoção de Cabelo , Melanoma/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Folículo Piloso , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Monte Carlo , Absorção Cutânea , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
9.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 312(8): 533-544, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32055931

RESUMO

Skin cancers are the most common malignancies diagnosed worldwide. In Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, skin cancer remains a significant health burden. Multiple studies have attempted to elucidate patient knowledge and attitudes regarding skin cancer risks and behavioral interventions to reduce risks. A systematic literature search of relevant articles was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Saudi Digital Library databases. A narrative analysis of relevant study results was conducted. A total of 12 studies were reviewed across GCC. These studies revealed common themes among GCC populations. Many study participants were aware that excess sun exposure represents a threat to health and increases cancer risk. Several studies reported sun exposure, with a mean of 19.13 h per week. More studies reported patients engaging in lower or no sunscreen use rather than regular sunscreen use. There are discrepancies in the understanding of sun exposure risk and risk mitigation practices among the study populations. Skin cancer poses a significant burden to patients in GCC countries and improved patient education will enhance population health.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Roupa de Proteção , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Barein/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Kuweit/epidemiologia , Omã/epidemiologia , Catar/epidemiologia , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Autoexame , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/patologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Emirados Árabes Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 29(1): 89-91, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30998526

RESUMO

This study describes a randomised control trial investigating whether printed leaflets or social media are more effective in increasing knowledge of the risks of sun exposure and melanoma in people aged 18-29. The study participants were 18-29-year-old university students or graduates, recruited in London. A baseline level of knowledge was measured using the Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge questionnaire. Study participants were then randomised into either a leaflet arm or Facebook arm. Identical information was delivered through a SunSafe campaign via either posted leaflets or Facebook during a 10-day exposure window. Following this, participants repeated the Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge questionnaire. Following the SunSafe intervention, the mean knowledge score improved in both groups to a statistically significant degree (Facebook = 1.82, leaflets = 3.04, P < 0.001). Moreover, the improvement in knowledge score of the leaflet arm was statistically significantly greater than in the Facebook arm (95% confidence interval: 0.35-2.09, P = 0.0059). Participants of lighter skin colour demonstrated greater levels of knowledge about skin cancer and sun exposure at baseline (P = 0.005; P < 0.05). There was no correlation between sex and baseline knowledge (P = 0.7725). There was no significant effect of skin tone or sex on the knowledge change (P = 0.139 and 0.643). The findings suggest that printed information in the form of leaflets is more impactful in increasing knowledge than online platforms such as Facebook among a young adult demographic in the UK. These findings should be considered when designing public health campaigns, acting as a reminder to not neglect traditional media in health promotion.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Melanoma/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Londres , Masculino , Melanoma/etiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Pigmentação da Pele , Mídias Sociais , Banho de Sol/educação , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Cancer Educ ; 35(1): 125-130, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30460492

RESUMO

Despite decades of public health campaigns, tanning and sunburn still occur at unacceptably high rates. Skin cancer prevention campaigns predominately focus on increasing awareness of the risk of excessive sun exposure. This study sought to assess the efficacy of this approach, by interrogating correlations between risk perception and sun exposure behaviour. A 31-item questionnaire assessing skin cancer risk factors, tanning attitudes, sunburn and tanning behaviour was undertaken by individuals who attended a workplace skin check. Validated questions were included to assess cognitive and affective risk perception and to frame risk as absolute, comparative and conditional. One hundred sixty-seven respondents completed the questionnaire. No aspects of risk perception (absolute cognitive, affective or conditional) significantly correlated with protective sun exposure behaviour, with the exception of perceived comparative severity of skin cancer. Instead, positive tanning attitudes were far more significantly correlated with sun exposure behaviour. Actual risk and risk perception have very limited impact on sun exposure behaviour. Instead, sun exposure behaviour was significantly linked with positive tanning attitudes. It is suggested, therefore, that campaigns focussing solely on education regarding risk factors appear to have been ineffective in behaviour mitigation, and innovative approaches, aimed at influencing tanning norms, might complement the existing educational campaigns.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/normas , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Banho de Sol/psicologia , Queimadura Solar/psicologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Protetores Solares/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/psicologia , Queimadura Solar/etiologia , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
12.
Eur J Dermatol ; 29(3): 274-280, 2019 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31389786

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skin aging can be classified as either physiological or pathological aging. Pathological aging is most often due to chronic sunlight exposure (photoaging). Age-dependent changes in dermoscopic features of normal skin have not previously been well defined. OBJECTIVES: We compared the dermoscopic features of skin from non-elderly subjects, elderly subjects with physiological aging, and elderly subjects with photoaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 40 non-elderly subjects aged 20-60 years, 40 elderly subjects aged >60 years with physiological aging, and 40 elderly subjects aged >60 years with photoaging. Skin from the lower legs of subjects was examined by dermoscopy. RESULTS: Compared with non-elderly subjects, dermoscopic examination of elderly subjects with physiological aging and photoaging revealed various degrees of xerosis (mild: scaling limited to skin furrows; moderate: scaling extending beyond skin furrows with accentuation of skin markings; severe: plate-like scaling extending beyond skin furrows with formation of deep skin fissures). In addition, dermoscopic examination of skin from elderly subjects with photoaging showed increased prevalence of uneven pigmentation (small brown globules, reticular pigmentation, and homogeneous pigmentation in a patchy distribution) and vascular telangiectasia (linear and branching vessels). CONCLUSION: This study provides a novel dermoscopic grading system to evaluate the severity of xerosis and demonstrates the application of dermoscopy for the accurate assessment of subtle morphological changes (including pigmentation pattern and vascular structures) associated with physiological aging and photoaging.


Assuntos
Dermoscopia/métodos , Transtornos da Pigmentação/patologia , Envelhecimento da Pele/patologia , Pele/patologia , Doenças Vasculares/patologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos da Pigmentação/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Pele/irrigação sanguínea , Pigmentação da Pele/fisiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
13.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 146 Suppl 2: IIS3-IIS9, 2019 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31133227

RESUMO

Actinic keratosis is a premalignant skin lesion resulting from proliferation of atypical epidermal keratinocytes. Actinic keratoses are very frequent and their prevalence is increasing. Risk factors for actinic keratosis include intrinsic and environmental factors, particularly exposure to ultraviolet radiation and advanced age. The main factor is the exposition to ultraviolet radiation. Better sun protection decreases the risk of actinic keratosis and also the risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma, even though not all actinic keratoses progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. A diagnosis of actinic keratosis should encourage patients to do an annual dermatological screening of skin cancers. Given the economic cost of actinic keratoses, a global approach of health authorities could be interesting for their management. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Kératoses actiniques : comprendre et traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Galderma International.


Assuntos
Ceratose Actínica/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Humanos , Ceratose Actínica/economia , Ceratose Actínica/etiologia , Ceratose Actínica/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
14.
Health Promot J Austr ; 30(2): 272-275, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276918

RESUMO

ISSUES ADDRESSED: Cutaneous melanomas and keratinocyte carcinomas (nonmelanoma skin cancer) are highly prevalent in New Zealand (NZ), making skin cancer a priority area for cancer control. Spring is an important time for encouraging sun-safety, due to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) levels becoming hazardous. The news media have a potential to play an important role in reminding people and emphasising the importance of sun-safety. This study aimed to describe how the traditional NZ media portrayed sun-safety and skin cancer in spring news stories. METHODS: A media monitoring company collated stories related to cancer during spring 2016. These were reviewed for inclusion and content was coded according to the cancer type described. Stories focused on skin cancer and sun protection issues were coded according to the position on the cancer control continuum. RESULTS: Skin cancer and sun-safety represented 3.6% (n = 110) of all cancer stories published. Stories mainly related to primary prevention (72%), early detection (37%) and survivorship (27%). The main risk factors identified included sun exposure (49%) and tanning (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional media coverage of skin cancer remains relatively low during springtime. It is heartening to see that most stories included prevention information. SO WHAT?: Given the impact of skin cancer in NZ, and the importance of springtime as a period for behaviour change to reduce risk, there is considerable scope for increased media coverage and advocacy. Further research could usefully analyse media trends throughout the year and within specific media platforms, both traditional and new, in order to further disseminate information to the NZ public.


Assuntos
Comunicação em Saúde/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Meios de Comunicação de Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Estações do Ano , Banho de Sol , Protetores Solares , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
15.
Br J Dermatol ; 180(2): 289-296, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29947134

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bakuchiol is a phytochemical that has demonstrated cutaneous antiageing effects when applied topically. Early studies have suggested that bakuchiol is a functional analogue of topical retinoids, as both compounds have been shown to induce similar gene expression in the skin and lead to improvement of cutaneous photodamage. No in vivo studies have compared the two compounds for efficacy and side-effects. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy and side-effect profiles of bakuchiol and retinol in improving common signs of cutaneous facial ageing. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week study in which 44 patients were asked to apply either bakuchiol 0·5% cream twice daily or retinol 0·5% cream daily. A facial photograph and analytical system was used to obtain and analyse high-resolution photographs of patients at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Patients also completed tolerability assessment questions to review side-effects. During study visits, a board-certified dermatologist, blinded to study group assignments, graded pigmentation and redness. RESULTS: Bakuchiol and retinol both significantly decreased wrinkle surface area and hyperpigmentation, with no statistical difference between the compounds. The retinol users reported more facial skin scaling and stinging. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that bakuchiol is comparable with retinol in its ability to improve photoageing and is better tolerated than retinol. Bakuchiol is promising as a more tolerable alternative to retinol.


Assuntos
Fenóis/administração & dosagem , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Vitamina A/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Face , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Dor/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Fenóis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Creme para a Pele/administração & dosagem , Creme para a Pele/efeitos adversos , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitamina A/efeitos adversos
16.
Nat Commun ; 9(1): 3743, 2018 09 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30254260

RESUMO

Spectrally-selective monitoring of ultraviolet radiations (UVR) is of paramount importance across diverse fields, including effective monitoring of excessive solar exposure. Current UV sensors cannot differentiate between UVA, B, and C, each of which has a remarkably different impact on human health. Here we show spectrally selective colorimetric monitoring of UVR by developing a photoelectrochromic ink that consists of a multi-redox polyoxometalate and an e- donor. We combine this ink with simple components such as filter paper and transparency sheets to fabricate low-cost sensors that provide naked-eye monitoring of UVR, even at low doses typically encountered during solar exposure. Importantly, the diverse UV tolerance of different skin colors demands personalized sensors. In this spirit, we demonstrate the customized design of robust real-time solar UV dosimeters to meet the specific need of different skin phototypes. These spectrally-selective UV sensors offer remarkable potential in managing the impact of UVR in our day-to-day life.


Assuntos
Desenho de Equipamento , Pigmentação da Pele , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Tungstênio/química , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Cor , Colorimetria/economia , Colorimetria/instrumentação , Colorimetria/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Tinta , Papel , Radiometria/economia , Radiometria/instrumentação , Radiometria/métodos , Pele/efeitos da radiação
17.
JAMA Dermatol ; 154(8): 897-902, 2018 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29955755

RESUMO

Importance: Understanding patterns of sun-protective behaviors and their association with sunburn can provide important insight into measurement approaches and intervention targets. Objective: To assess whether decision-based modeling can be used to identify patterns of sun-protective behaviors associated with the likelihood of sunburn and to compare the predictive value of this method with traditional (ie, composite score) measurement approaches. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a nationally representative sample of 31 162 US adults from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, consisting of household interviews conducted in person and completed by telephone when necessary. Participants included civilian noninstitutionalized US adults. Data were collected from January 1 through December 31, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: The associations among sun sensitivity, multiple sun-protective behaviors (ie, using sunscreen, seeking shade, wearing a hat, and wearing protective clothing), and sunburn were examined using a χ2 automatic interaction detection method for decision tree analysis. Results were compared with a composite score approach. Results: In our study population of 28 558 respondents with complete data (54.1% women; mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.0] years), 20 patterns of sun protection were identified. Among 15 992 sun-sensitive individuals, those who used only sunscreen had the highest likelihood of sunburn (62.4%). The group with the lowest likelihood of sunburn did not report using sunscreen but engaged in the other 3 protective behaviors (24.3% likelihood of sunburn). Among 12 566 non-sun-sensitive individuals, those who engaged in all 4 protective behaviors had the lowest likelihood of sunburn (6.6%). The highest likelihood of sunburn was among those who only reported sunscreen use (26.2%). The decision tree model and the composite score approach correctly classified a similar number of cases; however, the decision tree model was superior in classifying cases with sunburn (44.3% correctly classified in the decision tree vs 25.9% with the composite score). Conclusions and Relevance: This innovative application of a decision tree analytic approach demonstrates the interactive and sometimes counterintuitive effects of multiple sun-protective behaviors on likelihood of sunburn. These data show where traditional measurement approaches of behavior may fall short and highlight the importance of linking behavior to a clinically relevant outcome. Given the scope of those affected and enormous associated health care costs, improving efforts in skin cancer prevention has the potential for a significant effect on public health.


Assuntos
Árvores de Decisões , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Roupa de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Queimadura Solar/epidemiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
18.
Photochem Photobiol ; 94(6): 1297-1307, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29896764

RESUMO

Solar ultraviolet radiation is the primary risk factor for skin cancers and sun-related eye disorders. Estimates of individual ambient ultraviolet irradiance derived from ground-based solar measurements and from satellite measurements have rarely been compared. Using self-reported residential history from 67 189 persons in a nationwide occupational US radiologic technologists' cohort, we estimated ambient solar irradiance using data from ground-based meters and noontime satellite measurements. The mean distance moved from city of longest residence in childhood increased from 137.6 km at ages 13-19 to 870.3 km at ages ≥65, with corresponding increases in absolute latitude difference moved. At ages 20/40/60/80, the Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients of ground-based and satellite-derived potential solar ultraviolet exposure, using irradiance and cumulative radiant exposure metrics, were high (=0.87-0.92). There was also moderate correlation (Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients = 0.51-0.60) between irradiance at birth and at last-known address, for ground-based and satellite data. Satellite-based lifetime estimates of ultraviolet radiation were generally 14-15% lower than ground-based estimates, albeit with substantial uncertainties, possibly because ground-based estimates incorporate fluctuations in cloud and ozone, which are incompletely incorporated in the single noontime satellite-overpass ultraviolet value. If confirmed elsewhere, the findings suggest that ground-based estimates may improve exposure assessment accuracy and potentially provide new insights into ultraviolet radiation-disease relationships in epidemiologic studies.


Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Doses de Radiação , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Comunicações Via Satélite/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Atividade Solar , Estados Unidos
19.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(11): 1906-1913, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer being the most common cancer in Germany has shown increasing incidence in the past decade. Since mostly caused by excessive UV exposure, skin cancer is largely related to behaviour. So far, the impact of regional and sociodemographic factors on the development of skin cancer in Germany is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the association of potential predictive factors with the prevalence of skin cancers in Germany. METHODS: Nationwide ambulatory care claims data from persons insured in statutory health insurances (SHI) with malignant melanoma (MM, ICD-10 C43) and non-melanocytic skin cancer (NMSC, ICD-10 C44) in the years 2009-2015 were analysed. In addition, sociodemographic population data and satellite-based UV and solar radiation data were associated. Descriptive and multivariate (spatial) statistical analyses (e.g. Bayes' smoothing) were conducted on county level. RESULTS: Data from 70.1 million insured persons were analysed. Age-standardized prevalences per 100 000 SHI insured persons for MM and NMSC were 284.7 and 1126.9 in 2009 and 378.5 and 1708.2 in 2015. Marked regional variations were observed with prevalences between 32.9% and 51.6%. Multivariate analysis shows among others statistically significant positive correlations between higher income and education, and MM/NMSC prevalence. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of MM and NMSC in Germany shows spatio-temporal dynamics. Our results demonstrate that regional UV radiation, sunshine hours and sociodemographic factors have significant impact on skin cancer prevalence in Germany. Individual behaviour obviously is a major determinant which should be subject to preventive interventions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Demografia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , População Rural , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Urbana
20.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 15(6): 481-491, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695213

RESUMO

Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the second most prevalent carcinogenic exposure in Canada and is similarly important in other countries with large Caucasian populations. The objective of this article was to estimate the economic burden associated with newly diagnosed non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) attributable to occupational solar radiation exposure. Key cost categories considered were direct costs (healthcare costs, out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs), and informal caregiver costs); indirect costs (productivity/output costs and home production costs); and intangible costs (monetary value of the loss of health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). To generate the burden estimates, we used secondary data from multiple sources applied to computational methods developed from an extensive review of the literature. An estimated 2,846 (5.3%) of the 53,696 newly diagnosed cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and 1,710 (9.2%) of the 18,549 newly diagnosed cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 2011 in Canada were attributable to occupational solar radiation exposure. The combined total for direct and indirect costs of occupational NMSC cases is $28.9 million ($15.9 million for BCC and $13.0 million for SCC), and for intangible costs is $5.7 million ($0.6 million for BCC and $5.1 million for SCC). On a per-case basis, the total costs are $5,670 for BCC and $10,555 for SCC. The higher per-case cost for SCC is largely a result of a lower survival rate, and hence higher indirect and intangible costs. Our estimates can be used to raise awareness of occupational solar UV exposure as an important causal factor in NMSCs and can highlight the importance of occupational BCC and SCC among other occupational cancers.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/economia , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/economia , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/economia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA