Assessment of fixed-duration therapies for treatment-naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

Comparative data guiding initial therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), an infrequently encountered non-Hodgkin lymphoma, are sparse. We evaluated three commonly used rituximab-based frontline regimens: rituximab-bendamustine (R-Benda); dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide (DRC); and bortezomib, dexamethasone, rituximab (BDR) in 220 treatment-naïve patients with WM, seen at Mayo Clinic between November 1, 2000 and October 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 4.5 (95%CI: 4-5) years. The R-Benda cohort (n = 83) demonstrated superior overall response rate (ORR: 98%), in comparison to DRC (n = 92, ORR: 78%) or BDR (n = 45, ORR: 84%) cohorts, p = 0.003. Similarly, longer progression-free survival (PFS) was evident with R-Benda use [median 5.2 vs. 4.3 (DRC) and 1.8 years (BDR), p < 0.001]. The time-to-next therapy (TTNT) favored R-Benda [median, not-reached, 4.4 (DRC) and 2.6 years (BDR), p < 0.001). These endpoints were comparable between the DRC and BDR cohorts. Overall survival (OS) was similar across the three cohorts, p = 0.77. In a subset analysis of 142 patients genotyped for MYD88L265P mutation, the ORR, PFS and TTNT were unaffected by the patients' MYD88 signature within each cohort. In conclusion, ORR, PFS and TTNT with R-Benda are superior compared to DRC or BDR in treatment-naïve patients with active WM. The patient outcomes with any one of these three regimens are unaffected by the MYD88L265P mutation status.

Overview of antibody therapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The main treatment modalities for lymphoma in the past decade have been radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Recently, molecular engineering provided humanized antibodies with promising clinical activity, and rituximab is the first commercially available antibody. This anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) showed little toxicity and demonstrated excellent clinical activity. Given as a single agent, it induces a high-response rate even in pretreated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the effect being higher if administered for a prolonged period of time. Its action is synergistic with chemotherapy, and combination treatment could improve survival in patients with aggressive lymphomas. Rituximab also demonstrated the ability to clear tumor cells from the circulation, allowing for an in vivo purging effect in the setting of peripheral stem cell collection and transplantation. Still, a number of issues related to its use need to be addressed, such as optimal dose and schedule and the situations in which rituximab should be given as a single agent or in addition to chemotherapy or other drugs, such as other MoAbs or interferons. We also need to understand when rituximab should be used in first-line treatment, with which type of chemotherapy the combination is most cost-effective, and patient population that will benefit most from this antibody treatment.

Uniform response criteria in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a malignant disorder of lymphoplasmacytic cells that produce a monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). Since the original description by Jan Waldenström of three patients with symptoms of hyperviscosity due to circulating monoclonal IgM, the definition of WM has been controversial. Standardized criteria for diagnosis have now been proposed, including the presence of any IgM monoclonal protein and marrow and/or nodal lymphoplasmacytic cells. Although previous response criteria have generally incorporated parameters for monoclonal protein reduction and/or improvement of marrow/nodal involvement, specific and uniform response criteria are needed to facilitate comparisons of response, remission duration, progression-free survival, and overall survival in clinical trials similar to those previously established for other diseases such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma. This is of particular importance as new agents are developed and evaluated. This presentation represents consensus recommendations for uniform response criteria for use in assessing responses to treatment for patients with WM, which were prepared in conjunction with the Second International Workshop held in Athens, Greece during September 2002.