Rereduction for Redisplacement of Both-Bone Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children.

BACKGROUND: There is a high rate of redisplacement after closed reduction and cast treatment of displaced both-bone forearm shaft fractures in children. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of rereduction of these redisplaced fractures. This study evaluates the impact of rereduction on radiographic outcomes and compares the cost to surgical stabilization. METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 children (mean age, 6.3 y; 18 boys) treated with rereduction for redisplacement of a displaced both-bone forearm shaft fracture between 2008 and 2013. Angulation was measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the radius and ulna at injury, after reduction, at redisplacement, after rereduction, and at fracture union. Average procedure costs for rereduction and surgical stabilization were calculated. RESULTS: Initial reduction decreased apex volar angulation (initially >20 degrees) of both bones to a median of ≤2 degrees. After an average of 15 days (range, 4 to 35 d), apex volar angulation of the radius worsened to 9 degrees, and apex ulnar angulation worsened to >10 degrees for both bones. For every 5 days after initial reduction, apex ulnar angulation of the radius worsened by 4 degrees. Rereduction reduced apex ulnar and volar angulation of both bones to <5 degrees, which was maintained after cast removal. There were no complications. The average procedure cost for rereduction was $2056 compared with $4589 for surgical stabilization with or without implant removal. CONCLUSION: Rereduction of both-bone forearm shaft fractures after redisplacement following initial closed reduction had satisfactory radiographic outcomes and is a safe, effective, and less expensive option than surgical stabilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Cost-effectiveness of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Clubfoot is disabling, with an incidence of 0.9/1,000 live births to 7/1,000 live births. It affects mobility, productivity, and quality of life. Patients are treated surgically or non-surgically using the Ponseti method. We estimated the cost per patient treated with both methods and the cost-effectiveness of these methods in Pakistan. METHODS: Parents of patients treated, either surgically or with the Ponseti method, at the Indus Hospital's free program for clubfoot were interviewed between February and May 2012. We measured the direct and indirect household expenditures for pre-diagnosis, incomplete treatment, and current treatment until the first brace for Ponseti method and the first corrective surgery for surgically treated patients. Hospital expenditure was measured by existing accounts. RESULTS: Average per-patient cost was $349 for the Ponseti method and $810 for patients treated surgically. Of these, the Indus hospital costs were $170 the for Ponseti method and $452 for surgically treated patients. The direct household expenditure was $154 and $314 for the Ponseti and surgical methods, respectively. The majority of the costs were incurred pre-diagnosis and after inadequate treatment, with the largest proportion spent on transportation, material, and fee for service. The Ponseti method is shown to be the dominant method of treatment, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,225. CONCLUSIONS: The Ponseti method is clearly the treatment of choice in resource-constrained settings like Pakistan. Household costs for clubfoot treatment are substantial, even in programs offering free diagnostics and treatments and may be a barrier to service utilization for the poorest patients.

Barriers to the Ponseti method in Peru: a two-year follow-up.

Idiopathic clubfoot affects approximately 100,000 children each year and is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The Ponseti method is an inexpensive, non-surgical treatment that, when executed correctly, is more than 95% effective; however, in Peru, a developing country where a low-cost alternative is greatly needed, physicians report up to 30% of patients do not complete treatment. This study involved semi-structured interviews with 25 physicians who practice the Ponseti Method in Peru to discuss obstacles for the method in their country. The most frequent obstacles to the Ponseti method in Peru reported by physicians included lack of physicians trained in the Ponseti method in the country, patient transportation and distance to treatment centers, and lack of parental knowledge of the Ponseti method. These data suggest the need to train more physicians in Peru, particularly in the provinces. Increasing access to trained physicians in provincial areas may reduce the financial and travel burden of parents to help increase compliance with treatment.

[Nonsurgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip]. / Konservative Behandlung der Hüftreifungsstörung.

The introduction of hip ultrasound for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has led to earlier diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The younger the child, the greater the potential of acetabular remodelling. An early-initiated, differentiated therapy according to the Graf classification has led to good treatment results. Nevertheless, there is still a number of residual dysplasia and a risk for late sequelae even after successful ultrasound-guided therapy. Therefore, long-term follow-up of treated hips until skeletal maturity is necessary. Whereas there is no doubt about the good results of the treatment we apply, its economic effectiveness still has to be proven.

Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation.

The objectives of this study were (1) to assess societal costs-of-illness and their changes in the year prior to and after outpatient rehabilitation (OPR) in initially gainfully employed persons with low back pain and (2) to identify predictors (cost drivers) for high overall costs in the year after the intervention. The health economical analysis is part of a prospective clinical trial investigating patients participating in orthopedic OPR. In all gainfully employed patients (n=244) resource consumption and productivity losses were assessed prior to OPR and 12 months afterwards. Overall annual medical costs per person were estimated. Parameters associated with high overall costs in the 12 months after OPR were predicted by multivariate logistic regression analysis. All sociodemographic, motivational, clinical, psychological, therapeutic and vocational variables were included as possible predictors. Costs due to sick leave periods represent the major component (83%/58%) of overall costs in both periods. The comparison of costs 12 months before and after OPR reveals a significant reduction from 8050 to 3200 per person, primarily caused by decreasing sick leave costs and the reduction of costs related to inpatient treatment. The prediction analysis reveals that patients with limited functional abilities, with problems due to strenuous labour, with low expectations in terms of possible improvement after OPR, with a high pain score or with limited satisfaction with working colleagues have a significantly higher risk for costs exceeding 2200 after OPR. The identified cost drivers can be used to develop multimodal therapeutic measures, which should be employed during the OPR intervention in order to prevent future costs.

Dynamic magnetic resonance guided treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

This study demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of near real-time, multiplanar, dynamic magnetic resonance image-assisted treatment of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pathoanatomy and dynamic blocks to reduction are visualized with anatomic clarity not otherwise possible. Continuous imaging allows accurate assessment and maintenance of optimum positioning throughout the casting procedure. Patient charges for this new technique are less than standard methods of treatment, and the child receives no ionizing radiation.

Recurrent nursemaid's elbow (annular ligament displacement) treatment via telephone.

Annular ligament displacement (ALD)--also termed radial head subluxation, nursemaid's elbow, or pulled elbow--can be successfully diagnosed and treated over the telephone by properly trained medical professionals instructing nonmedical caretakers. Two case reports of successful ALD reduction via telephone are described. The pathology of ALD and techniques for its treatment are reviewed, and guidelines are given. The rationale for the introduction of the new term annular ligament displacement as well as areas for additional investigation are discussed. To our knowledge, this is the first published account of ALD reduction via telephone.

Comparison between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pinning in children with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

This was a randomized controlled trial of 28 children 1 year to 12 years of age with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fracture. The purpose of the study was to compare closed reduction and pinning (group A) and open reduction and pinning (group B). Each group consisted of 14 children. The general characteristics of both groups (age, sex side, displacement, nerve injury preoperatively) were statistically the same (P > 0.05). All cases healed with good alignment without cubitus varus, without infection and with a good range of motion except for one. The mean +/- standard deviation of the Baumann's angle difference between the injured and uninjured side were 2.32 +/- 1.6 degrees in group A (range, 0-6.5 degrees) and 2.45 +/- 1.8 degrees in group B (range, 0-6.5 degrees). This difference was statistically not significant (P = 0.8). By Flynn criteria, group A had good to excellent results in 100%, and group B had good to excellent results in 93% and fair in 7%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). The satisfaction score (0-10) was significantly higher in group A for both parents' and evaluator's (blinded to treatment) perspective (P = 0.017 and 0.019, respectively). The author concludes that both treatments gave good results. Closed reduction should be performed first and, if it fails, then open reduction can be performed. This will produce good results in the hands of an experienced surgeon.

The cost of treatment of distal radial fractures.

In an increasingly cost conscious management of health care, estimating the cost of treatment of distal radial fractures has significant relevance. We studied 100 distal radial fractures, prospectively, from their presentation to eventual discharge. On an average, pound320.50 were spent on each patient during 1997. Ninety percent of the costs were seen to be service costs and only 10% were those of consumables. A proportion of costs incurred due to remanipulations could have been saved by supervised primary treatment. Also, lack of protocols resulted in increased use of clinic time, physiotherapy sessions and radiographs. In-patient treatment was seen to account for the bulk of the expenditure. We have identified certain guidelines to improve the primary treatment of these fractures and the possibility of treating them in designated sessions in the day surgery unit. This is likely to reduce the overall cost of treatment of these very commonly sustained fractures though this will need to be proved in a future validated study.

[A method of cost evaluation of orthopedic treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures in school-age children]. / Une méthode d'évaluation du coût du traitement orthopédique des fractures diaphysaires du fémur chez l'enfant d'âge scolaire.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Femoral diaphysis fractures are very frequent in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost of orthopaedic treatment for femoral diaphysis fracture in school's age children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 femoral fractures were reviewed at an average of 5 years follow-up with many economic parameters. DISCUSSION: Different treatments are available for this type of fracture. Actually, there is a controversy between orthopaedic and surgical treatment and no one gives better long term results. Therefore economic reasons can help for the choice of the method when the final result is equivalent. The same study should be realized for other available fracture treatments. CONCLUSION: Future studies should use the same methodology in order to obtain the real cost of each treatment.

Intraarticular lidocaine versus intravenous analgesic for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. A prospective randomized study.

We performed a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the use of injected lidocaine as an anesthetic for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. Thirty consecutive patients who presented at the emergency department with acute anterior shoulder dislocations were randomly placed in one of two groups. One group received an intraarticular injection of 20 ml of 1% lidocaine and the other group, intravenous injections of morphine sulfate and midazolam. The groups were compared regarding time of reduction maneuver, difficulty of reduction, subjective pain, complications, and total time spent in the emergency department. The lidocaine provided adequate anesthesia and secondary relief of muscle spasm in 15 of 15 (100%) patients. When compared with the intravenous sedation group, the lidocaine group showed no statistically significant difference in time for reduction maneuver, difficulty of reduction, or subjective pain. The lidocaine group had no complications and had a statistically significant shorter emergency department visit when compared with the intravenous sedation group (mean, 78 minutes versus 186 minutes; P = 0.004). Lidocaine provides excellent anesthesia for patients with uncomplicated anterior shoulder dislocations and can be very beneficial when sedation is contraindicated. Lidocaine injections also proved to be cost effective in our institution, reducing total costs by as much as 62%.

Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment for managing low back pain of mechanical origin. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. Allocation to chiropractic or hospital management by minimisation to establish groups for analysis of results according to initial referral clinic, length of current episode, history, and severity of back pain. Patients were followed up for up two years. SETTING: Chiropractic and hospital outpatient clinics in 11 centres. PATIENTS: 741 Patients aged 18-65 who had no contraindications to manipulation and who had not been treated within the past month. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment at the discretion of the chiropractors, who used chiropractic manipulation in most patients, or of the hospital staff, who most commonly used Maitland mobilisation or manipulation, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the score on the Oswestry pain disability questionnaire and in the results of tests of straight leg raising and lumbar flexion. RESULTS: Chiropractic treatment was more effective than hospital outpatient management, mainly for patients with chronic or severe back pain. A benefit of about 7% points on the Oswestry scale was seen at two years. The benefit of chiropractic treatment became more evident throughout the follow up period. Secondary outcome measures also showed that chiropractic was more beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with low back pain in whom manipulation is not contraindicated chiropractic almost certainly confers worthwhile, long term benefit in comparison with hospital outpatient management. The benefit is seen mainly in those with chronic or severe pain. Introducing chiropractic into NHS practice should be considered.