Correlation of lactulose-to-mannitol ratios in plasma and urine for intestinal permeability assessment in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: The lactulose-to-mannitol ratio test is a test to assess the disorders associated with gut permeability. The test requires an oral administration of the mixture of lactulose and mannitol and urine collection. The urinary ratio of lactulose to mannitol is an indicator of intestinal permeability. Due to the complexity of urine collection in animal studies, plasma exposure ratios of lactulose to mannitol compared to their urinary concentration ratios were evaluated following an oral administration of the sugar mixture in pigs. ANIMALS: 10 pigs were orally dosed with a solution of lactulose and mannitol mixture. PROCEDURES: Plasma samples were collected at predose, 10 and 30 minutes and 2, 4, and 6 hours postdosing, and cumulated urinary samples were collected at 6 hours for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. The ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters of lactulose to mannitol and the plasma sugar ratios at a single time point or the mean values of several time points were compared to their urinary sugar ratios. RESULTS: The results revealed that the lactulose-to-mannitol ratios of AUC0-6h, AUCextrap, and Cmax were correlated to the urinary sugar ratios, and the plasma sugar ratios of a single time point at 2, 4, or 6 hours and the mean values of those time points were also appropriate to replace their urinary ratios in pigs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Following an oral administration of lactulose and mannitol mixture, blood collection, and assay can be an option for assessing intestinal permeability, especially in animal studies.

Assessment of small-intestine permeability in healthy Nigerian children is altered by urinary volume and voiding status.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to uncover the effect of voided urinary volume on small intestine permeability ratios in healthy children. METHODS: We assessed small intestine permeability in 155 apparently healthy children, aged 3-5 years old, without any visible symptoms of disease, in a rural, malaria-endemic setting in Nigeria, using a multi-sugar test solution, comprising lactulose, sucrose, mannitol, and rhamnose. Children were categorized into low urinary volume (LV) and high urinary volume (HV), based on the volume of urine voided per kg body weight per hour. LV children voided less than 25th percentile of the total population, while HV children voided greater than 75th percentile of the total population. Urinary volume excreted over a 90-minute period after administration of the test solution was measured, and differences in sugar ratios were compared between children with high (HV) and low urinary volumes (LV), as well as between children who voided (VC) or who were not able to void (NVC) before administration of the test solution. RESULTS: Urinary mannitol and rhamnose recovery were 44% (p = 0.002) and 77% (p<0.001) higher in HV children compared to LV children respectively, while urinary lactulose recovery was 34% lower (p = 0.071). There was no difference in urinary sucrose recovery between groups (p = 0.74). Lactulose-mannitol ratio, lactulose-rhamnose ratio and sucrose-rhamnose ratio were all significantly higher in children in the LV group compared to children in the HV group (p<0.001). In a multiple regression analysis, urinary volume and voiding status combined, explained 13%, 23% and 7% of the variation observed in lactulose-mannitol, lactulose-rhamnose and sucrose-rhamnose ratios, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sugar permeability ratios vary significantly with total urinary volume in multi-sugar small-intestine permeability tests. Voiding status before sugar administration appears to influence lactulose recovery, lactulose-rhamnose and sucrose-rhamnose ratios independently of total urinary volume. Evidence from this study suggests the need to take urinary volume into account when conducting multi-sugar small-intestine permeability tests.

Simultaneous assessment of intestinal permeability and lactase activity in human-milk-fed preterm infants by sugar absorption test: Clinical implementation and analytical method.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Experimental (nutritional) interventions in preterm infants frequently focus on intestinal maturation, as improving tolerance to enteral nutrition is a major goal. Intestinal permeability and lactase activity serve as markers for intestinal maturation. We aimed to develop a protocol for the simultaneous assessment of both markers in human-milk-fed preterm infants by a sugar absorption test. In addition, we developed a new gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for the analysis of lactulose, lactose, and mannitol in urine and milk collected during the sugar absorption test. METHODS: The sugar absorption test was performed on days 4, 7, and 14 postpartum in 12 preterm infants (gestational age of 26-32 weeks). Human milk was collected, pooled, and divided into equal portions to provide a stable lactose intake for 24 h. Urine was collected in the last 6 h of this 24 h period, after administration of a bolus test sugar solution. Samples were analyzed by GC-MS after derivatization by oxime formation combined with acetylation. RESULTS: The GC-MS method was validated and used for the accurate measurement of lactulose, lactose, and mannitol concentrations. The urinary lactulose/mannitol ratio declined with time, suggesting a decreased intestinal permeability. The urine-to-milk-lactulose/lactose ratio increased as a result of increased lactase activity with time. CONCLUSIONS: The developed protocol for simultaneous assessment of intestinal permeability and lactase activity can be used to monitor the effect of experimental (nutritional) interventions in human-milk-fed preterm infants. Urine and milk samples obtained during the sugar absorption test can be accurately analyzed by GC-MS.

Assessment of the Intestinal Barrier with Five Different Permeability Tests in Healthy C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ Mice.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal permeability is thought to be of major relevance for digestive and nutrition-related diseases, and therefore has been studied in numerous mouse models of disease. However, it is unclear which tools are the preferable ones, and how normal values should be defined. AIMS: To compare different in vivo permeability tests in healthy mice of commonly used genetic backgrounds. METHODS: We assessed the intestinal barrier in male and female C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice of different ages, using four orally administered permeability markers, FITC-dextran 4000 (FITC-D4000) and ovalbumin (OVA) measured in plasma, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) and lactulose/mannitol (Lac/Man) measured in urine, and by assessing lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in portal vein plasma. RESULTS: After gavage, FITC-D4000, OVA, Lac/Man, and PEG400, but not PEG4000, were detectable in plasma or urine. Female mice tended to have a higher permeability according to the FITC-D4000, OVA, and PEG400 tests, but the Lac/Man ratio was higher in males. No significant differences between the two mouse strains of young and old mice were observed except for mannitol recovery, which was higher in BALB/cJ mice compared to C57BL/6J mice (p < 0.05). Virtually no LPS was detected in healthy mice. For all markers, normal values have been defined based on 5th-95th percentile ranges of our data. CONCLUSION: Selected oral permeability tests, such as FITC-D4000, OVA, PEG400, and Lac/Man, as well as LPS measurements in portal vein plasma, could be suitable for the evaluation of the intestinal barrier in mice, if used in a standardized way.

A rapid analytical method for the detection of plasma volume expanders and mannitol based on the urinary saccharides and polyalcohols profile.

A screening procedure specifically developed for the detection of saccharides and polyalcohols in human urine in the framework of doping control analysis is presented. The proposed method, set-up, and validated to detect the abuse of dextran, hydroxyethyl starch and mannitol as a doping practice in sport, involves only one enzymatic hydrolysis step and the direct injection into a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system. The chromatographic conditions were optimized to allow the efficient separation of compounds with the same molecular weight. Good linearity (R(2) 0.990-0.995) and reproducibility of relative retention times (CV% lower than 1) and of relative abundances of characteristic ion transitions (CV% lower than 10) were obtained. The lower limits of detection and quantification were in the range of 30-100 µg/ml. Since the analytes studied are present also in non-doping products (e.g. in fruit as well as in food products and drugs additives), the developed method was also used to establish a range of reference urinary concentrations: 600 doping control samples and 30 samples from volunteers not using any medication were considered. While the hydrolysis products (isomaltose and maltose hydroxyl-ethylated), used as specific markers for the detection of dextran and hydroxyethyl starch abuse, were not detected in urine; mannitol was present in all urines in a concentration range of 30-1200 µg/ml. Since no criteria of positivity for mannitol has been established yet, the results obtained in this study could be considered, in combination with those of previous researches, as a starting point to fix a threshold value for doping control purpose.

Assessment of intestinal permeability in (premature) neonates by sugar absorption tests.

Infants born prematurely have an enhanced intestinal permeability compared to healthy term infants. This enhanced permeability might be a contributing factor in the development of Necrotising Enterocolitis. The assessment of intestinal permeability in premature neonates with sugar absorption tests has been proven to be safe and of minimal burden to the infant. After enteral administration of a test solution containing lactulose and mannitol, the excretion of these sugars is measured in urine, and the ratio is calculated. The lactulose and mannitol concentrations in urine can be measured by the use of a gas chromatograph after pre-purification and derivatisation of the sample. Non-invasive assessment of intestinal permeability can be useful in monitoring the effects of experimental (nutritional) therapy.

Assessment of intestinal permeability using sugar probes: influence of urinary volume.

BACKGROUND: As the accuracy of the "Sugar Test" is currently debated, this study was conducted to focus on how urine volumes may impact the test results. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects, 23 healthy and 32 with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), were enrolled. Lactulose and D-mannitol dissolved in water were administered to all the participating subjects; the urine excreted was collected and the total urine volume was measured. The urine samples were analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The results were expressed as percentage of urine recovery of lactulose and D-mannitol and lactulose/D-mannitol ratio (LMR). RESULTS: All subjects were divided into two groups: subjects with urine volume < 500 mL and subjects with urine volume > or = 500 mL. Urine analysis showed that the mean LMR was significantly lower in subjects with urine volume > or = 500 mL than in subjects with urine volume < 500 mL (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs 0.04 +/- 0.04; p < 0.05). A significant increase in D-mannitol recovery was found to be associated with greater urine volumes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The urine volume may influence urinary excretion of sugar probes. Intake of liquids should therefore be carefully monitored before and during the test and the volume of urine produced over the period of collection should be precisely measured.

Assessment of small intestinal permeability using 1H-NMR spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of small intestinal permeability (SIP) is based on the estimation of the urinary excretion ratio of a large and a small molecule (lactulose and mannitol, L/M) after oral administration. We evaluated SIP using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. METHODS: In-vitro experiments on known concentration of mannitol and lactulose solutions were performed to measure accuracy and precession of quantification using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Eighteen patients with malabsorption syndrome (MAS) and 28 healthy subjects (HS) underwent SIP evaluation using L/M excretion ratio over 6-h after oral administration of 15 mL (10g) lactulose and 5 g mannitol using 1H-NMR spectroscopy and trimethyl silyl propionic acid as external reference and for quantification. RESULTS: Median errors of estimation of mannitol and lactulose were 5% (range 1.2 to 5) and 1.3% (range 0.2 to 1.3), respectively in-vitro. Patients with MAS excreted higher quantity of lactulose in urine than HS (median 0.33 mmol vs 0.12, 0 to .676 mmol, p<0.008). There was a trend towards lower urinary excretion of mannitol in patients with MAS than HS (median 3.58, range 0.61 to 15.77 mmol vs. 3.82, 1.34 to 16.42 mmol, p = ns). L/M ratio was higher among patients with MAS as compared to HS (median 0.1172 vs 0.045, p< 0.002). A cut-off value of L/M excretion ratio by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.049 had a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 61%, respectively; a cut-off value of 0.078 had a specificity of 90% but low sensitivity (67%). Area under ROC curve was 0.77. CONCLUSION: 1H-NMR spectroscopy is an analytical tool for assessment of SIP with reasonable sensitivity and specificity.

Experimental assessment of chemotherapy-induced early intestinal damage in colon cancer the lactulose-mannitol permeability test.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy plays an important role in the management and cure of cancer, it has undesiderable side effects mostly affecting the bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract, which greatly limit patient compliance and treatment efficacy. METHODS: The lactulose-mannitol test was used to assess intestinal mucosa damage 48 hours after the end of the first adjuvant chemotherapy cycle with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole in 12 patients with colon cancer. Fifteen age- and sex-matched subjects were studied as controls. The excreted amount of lactulose and mannitol was expressed as the percentage of the administered doses recovered in the urine as well as their ratio. RESULTS: The percent urinary recovery of lactulose was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in colon cancer patients (1.1 +/- 0.5%) than in the control group (0.3 +/- 0.03%), whereas the mannitol recovery was only slightly reduced in the former. As a result, the lactulose/mannitol excretion ratio was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in colon cancer patients (0.07 +/- 0.03) than in the control group (0.01 +/- 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As assessed by the lactulose-mannitol test, the combined chemotherapy regimen with 5-FU and levamisole affects mainly the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa rather than its absorption capacity. The toxic effect seems to be attributable to the 5-FU molecule rather than to levamisole. The lactulose-mannitol test is a simple, safe and reliable tool to evaluate chemotherapy-induced early damage to the intestinal epithelium, in particular when new kinds of substances are being administered. Its use in clinical practice seems appropriate to establish the correct timing of drug administration, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy and improving patient compliance.

Assessment of hypolactasia and site-specific intestinal permeability by differential sugar absorption of raffinose, lactose, sucrose and mannitol.

The sugar absorption test is a non-invasive test for investigating intestinal permeability by simultaneous measurement of four probe sugars. In this study, we evaluated the utility of raffinose, lactose, sucrose and mannitol as probe sugars and calculated their urinary recovery as a percentage of ingested dose (mol/mol) and the recovery ratios of raffinose/mannitol, lactose/ raffinose and sucrose/raffinose. The reference ranges for these ratios, established from 39 healthy volunteers, are 0.005-0.015, 0.13-0.63 and 0.09-0.47, respectively. This sugar absorption test was performed in three patient groups. i) In 109 patients with aspecific gastrointestinal symptoms of whom intestinal histology was studied by duodenal biopsies: the urinary raffinose/mannitol recovery ratio highly correlated with gradation of duodenal damage; the sensitivity and specificity of the raffinose/mannitol ratio for detection of intestinal damage were 93% and 91%, respectively, using a cut-off level of 0.020. ii) In 70 patients in whom intestinal lactase activity was investigated by the lactose tolerance test: the urinary lactose/raffinose recovery ratio provided high diagnostic accuracy for hypolactasia (sensitivity 81% and specificity 89% at a cut-off level of 0.70). In analogy with the lactose/raffinose ratio, we suppose that the sucrose/raffinose ratio can be used as a marker of hyposucrasia. iii) In 40 patients with localized small intestinal damage, Crohn's disease of the ileum (n = 21) and celiac disease with histologically proven duodenal damage (n = 19): the raffinose/mannitol recovery ratio was increased in 100% of patients with celiac disease and in 81% of patients with Crohn's disease; increased lactose/raffinose recovery ratio (hypolactasia) and increased sucrose/raffinose (hyposucrasia) were present in 89% and 95% of celiac patients and 19% and 0% of Crohn's disease patients, respectively. The combination of the raffinose/mannitol ratio and sucrose/raffinose ratio appears to be an indication of the distribution of intestinal damage.

Assessment of intestinal permeability: enzymatic determination of urinary mannitol, raffinose, sucrose and lactose on Hitachi analyzer.

The sugar absorption test is the usual test for measurement of intestinal permeability. After intestinal absorption of probe sugars the subsequently excreted sugars are measured in urine. We have developed four enzymatic methods for the measurement of the urinary concentration of the probe sugars mannitol, raffinose, lactose and sucrose. Mannitol, lactose and sucrose are directly measured on Hitachi 917 using mannitol dehydrogenase, beta-galactosidase and invertase, respectively, as enzyme reagents. Raffinose measurement needs a three hours preincubation with alpha-galactosidase, after which the liberated sucrose is measured. The analytical performances such as within- and between-run precision, linearity, lowest detection limit, interference of other sugars and comparison with a gas chromatographic method are described for the four methods. These methods are accurate an can easily be performed in any clinical laboratory.

Assessment of intestinal permeability with a two-hour urine collection.

The differential urinary excretion of orally administered lactulose and mannitol is used to evaluate intestinal permeability. This test usually involves a 5- to 6-hr urine collection. We hypothesized that a shorter collection time would give an equivalent result. Forty-three patients with a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms and diagnoses (group 1) and 42 patients with Crohn's disease (group 2) had a standard lactulose/mannitol permeability test. The lactulose and mannitol urinary excretion was calculated using the first urine (group 1) or the 1-hr and 2-hr urine (group 2) and was compared to the values calculated from the routine 5- or 6-hr collection. Lactulose excretion kinetics, expressed as the percent of the total urinary excretion within a given time period, were as follows: 21% in first hour (group 2), 29% in second hour (group 2), and 46% in first 2.5 hr (group 1). Mannitol urinary excretion kinetics were 16%, 31%, and 44%, respectively. The lactulose/mannitol ratio based on a standard urine collection correlated well with the ratio based on just the first urine produced by the patient (R2 = 0.94; P < 0.001; group 1) and the 2-hr urine (R2 = 0.464; P < 0.001; group 2). Future use of the lactulose/mannitol ratio to assess intestinal permeability may be able to be simplified by shortening the urine collection time.

Assessment of gastrointestinal permeability to small marker probes in the preruminant calf.

The intestinal permeability to markers was assessed in preruminant calves fed different milk substitutes containing skimmed milk powder or whey and soyabean products of differing antigenic activity as the protein sources. In Experiment 1, the 6 h urinary excretion of lactulose transiently decreased with the antigenic soyabean product but not that of sucrose of D-mannitol. In Experiment 2, the 6 h urinary excretion of sucrose and D-mannitol averaged 1-3%, regardless of age and dietary treatment. Cr-EDTA was recovered at rates of 2 and 4% after 6 and 24 h of urinary collection, respectively. The 24 h excretion of Cr-EDTA was lower in the calves fed the antigenic flour than in the controls after 2 weeks of experimental feeding (2.9 vs 6.0%, P < 0.05) but not thereafter. This transient decrease was also observed using D-xylose with the antigenic flour and with the non-antigenic concentrate (17 and 22% respectively vs 37%, P < 0.05). The present markers, including sucrose, may be suitable for assessing intestinal permeability in the calf even though excretion rates differed from one marker to another. Changes in the intestinal permeability to antigenic soya were of low magnitude and were only transiently detected when measured using lactulose, Cr-EDTA or D-xylose, probes which were therefore more sensitive than sucrose or D-mannitol.

Lactulose and mannitol as probe markers for in vivo assessment of passive intestinal permeability in healthy cats.

Intestinal permeability was assessed in 12 healthy cats by use of a differential sugar absorption test. A 50-ml isotonic aqueous solution containing a combination of 1.8 g of the disaccharide lactulose and 1.7 g of the monosaccharide mannitol was administered to cats via nasogastric tube. Urine was collected after 6 hours, and all urine samples were analyzed the same day, using a gas-liquid chromatographic technique (GLC) and an enzymatic assay (ENZ). Median urinary recovery of lactulose was 0.27 and 0.54% determined by GLC and ENZ, respectively. Differences between these groups were statistically significant (P = 0.023), and correlation between assays was high (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Median urinary recovery of mannitol was 1.93 and 2.09% for GLC and ENZ, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between these groups and the correlation between assays was high (r = 0.85, P < 0.01). The median lactulose-to-mannitol ratio was 0.29, using GLC, and was 0.52, using ENZ. Correlation of these ratios was again high (r = 0.93, P < 0.01).

Differential sugar absorption for the assessment of canine intestinal permeability: the cellobiose/mannitol test in gluten-sensitive enteropathy of Irish setters.

Intestinal permeability was assessed in Irish setters with gluten-sensitive enteropathy by oral administration of an isotonic solution of cellobiose and mannitol, and measurement of their urinary excretion ratio. The cellobiose/mannitol ratio was increased in affected Irish setters fed a wheat-containing diet compared both with littermates reared on a cereal-free diet, with no evidence of jejunal damage, and clinically healthy Irish setters. The ratio fell following six weeks on a gluten-free diet to be comparable with control values, and subsequently increased after six weeks gluten challenge. The results indicate that the cellobiose/mannitol test may be useful for the detection of mucosal damage and for monitoring the response to therapy.

Assessment of the lactulose-mannitol test in Crohn's disease.

The mannitol-lactulose intestinal permeability test was evaluated in 100 healthy controls and 47 patients with Crohn's disease. These patients were further separated into three subgroups of increased activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index) and in two subgroups, with elective colonic lesions and associated ileal and colonic lesions. Results were given as percentages of urinary recoveries for mannitol (M), lactulose (L), and L/M ratio. As a whole, patients with Crohn's disease have lower mean M and higher mean L and mean L/M ratios than controls. The magnitude of alterations in M, L, and L/M increased with activity. The sensitivity of the test, however, reached interesting figures (67%:L and 86%:L/M) only in subgroup III which was composed of relapsing patients. Mean M was lower in patients with associated ileal lesion but, whatever the criterion (M, L, or L/M), the test does not provide any clue for the detection of a possible infraclinical associated ileal localisation.