Cost-Effectiveness of Diffusion Weighted MRI Versus Planned Second-Look Surgery for Cholesteatoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of serial non-echo planar diffusion weighted MRI (non-EP DW MRI) versus planned second look surgery following initial canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy for the treatment of cholesteatoma. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed. Model inputs including residual cholesteatoma rates, rates of non-EP DW MRI positivity after surgery, and health utility scores were abstracted from published literature. Cost data were derived from the 2022 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services fee rates. Efficacy was defined as increase in quality-adjusted life year (QALY). One- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed on variables of interest to probe the model. Total time horizon was 50 years with a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold set at $50 000/QALY. RESULTS: Base case analysis revealed that planned second-look surgery ($11 537, 17.30 QALY) and imaging surveillance with non-EP DWMRI ($10 439, 17.26 QALY) were both cost effective options. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $27 298/QALY, which is below the WTP threhshold. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that non-EP DW MRI was more cost effective than planned second-look surgery if the rate of residual disease after surgery increased to 48.3% or if the rate of positive MRI was below 45.9%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis at WTP of $50 000/QALY found that second-look surgery was more cost-effective in 56.7% of iterations. CONCLUSION: Non-EP DW MRI surveillance is a cost-effect alternative to planned second-look surgery following primary canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma. Cholesteatoma surveillance decisions after initial canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy should be individualized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Perioperative cost evaluation of canal wall down mastoidectomy.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate perioperative costs of canal wall-down (CWD) mastoidectomy as an initial surgery compared to revision surgery following initial canal wall-up (CWU) mastoidectomy. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent CWD mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma at a tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into groups that had previous CWU surgery and were undergoing revision CWD and those that were having an initial CWD mastoidectomy. Cost variables including previous surgeries, imaging costs, audiometric testing, and post-operative visits were compared between the two groups using t-test analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference with regards to the cost of post-operative visits, peri-operative imaging, or revision surgeries between the two groups. Hearing outcomes based on mean speech reception threshold (SRT) were not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.087). There was a significant difference in total cost with the revision group having a higher mean cost by $6967.84, most of which was accounted for by the difference in the cost of the previous surgeries of $6488.53. CONCLUSIONS: The revision CWD surgery group had increased total cost that could be attributed to the cost of previous surgery. Increased peri-operative cost was not noted with the initial CWD surgery group for any individual variables examined. Initial CWD mastoidectomy should be considered in the proper patient population to help decrease healthcare costs.

Direct cost comparison of totally endoscopic versus open ear surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Totally endoscopic ear surgery is a relatively new method for managing chronic ear disease. This study aimed to test the null hypothesis that open and endoscopic approaches have similar direct costs for the management of attic cholesteatoma, from an Australian private hospital setting. METHODS: A retrospective direct cost comparison of totally endoscopic ear surgery and traditional canal wall up mastoidectomy for the management of attic cholesteatoma in a private tertiary setting was undertaken. Indirect and future costs were excluded. A direct cost comparison of anaesthetic setup and resources, operative setup and resources, and surgical time was performed between the two techniques. RESULTS: Totally endoscopic ear surgery has a mean direct cost reduction of AUD$2978.89 per operation from the hospital perspective, when compared to canal wall up mastoidectomy. CONCLUSION: Totally endoscopic ear surgery is more cost-effective, from an Australian private hospital perspective, than canal wall up mastoidectomy for attic cholesteatoma.