Physicochemical and Functional Similarity Assessment Between Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar BAT1706 and Reference Bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: BAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)-targeting biologic used to treat several different cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer. A comprehensive physicochemical and functional similarity assessment is a key component of demonstrating biosimilarity between a reference biologic and a proposed biosimilar. Here we report the physicochemical and functional similarity of BAT1706 and reference bevacizumab sourced from both the United States (US-bevacizumab) and the European Union (EU-bevacizumab). METHOD: A large range of product attributes, including primary and higher order structure, post-translational modifications, purity, stability, and potency, were characterized for BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab using sensitive state-of-the-art analytical techniques. Up to 18 lots of US- and 29 lots of EU-bevacizumab, and 10 unique drug substance lots of BAT1706, were assessed. RESULT: BAT1706 was shown to have an identical amino acid sequence and an indistinguishable higher-order structure compared with EU/US-bevacizumab. BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab also exhibited similar post-translational modifications, glycan profiles, and charge variants. Potency, assessed using a wide range of bioassays, was also shown to be comparable between BAT1706 and EU/US-bevacizumab, with statistical equivalence demonstrated for VEGF-A binding and neutralizing activity. CONCLUSION: Overall, this extensive comparability exercise demonstrated BAT1706 to match EU/US-bevacizumab in terms of all physicochemical and functional attributes assessed.

Biosimilar Use Among 38 ASCO PracticeNET Practices, 2019-2021.

PURPOSE: Biosimilars offer increased patient choice and potential cost-savings, compared with originator biologics. We studied 3 years of prescribed biologics among US physician practices to determine the relationship of practice type and payment source to oncology biosimilar use. METHODS: We acquired biologic utilization data from 38 practices participating in PracticeNET. We focused on six biologics (bevacizumab, epoetin alfa, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab) for the period from 2019 to 2021. We complemented our quantitative analysis with a survey of PracticeNET participants (prescribers and practice leaders) to reveal potential motivators and barriers to biosimilar use. We implemented logistic regression to evaluate the biosimilar use for each biologic, with covariates including time, practice type, and payment source, and accounted for clusters of practices. RESULTS: Use of biosimilars increased over the 3-year period, reaching between 51% and 80% of administered doses by the fourth quarter of 2021, depending on the biologic. Biosimilar use varied by practice, with independent physician practices having higher use of biosimilars for epoetin alfa, filgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab. Compared with commercial health plans, Medicaid plans had lower biosimilar use for four biologics; traditional Medicare had lower use for five biologics. The average cost per dose decreased between 24% and 41%, dependent on the biologic. CONCLUSION: Biosimilars have, through increased use, lowered the average cost per dose of the studied biologics. Biosimilar use differed by originator biologic, practice type, and payment source. There remains further opportunity for increases in biosimilar use among certain practices and payers.

Characterization for the Similarity Assessment between Proposed Biosimilar SB12 and Eculizumab Reference Product Using a State-of-the-Art Analytical Method.

BACKGROUND: SB12 is being developed as a proposed biosimilar to eculizumab reference product (RP), a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2/4 kappa immunoglobulin) that binds to the human C5 complement protein. Binding to this protein inhibits complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis by blocking its cleavage into C5a and C5b. Eculizumab RP is indicated for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) to reduce hemolysis, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) to inhibit complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy, generalized myasthenia gravis who are anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate structural, physicochemical, and biological similarity between eculizumab RP and SB12 using various state-of-the-art analytical methods. METHODS: Comprehensive analytical characterization was conducted with side-by-side comparison of SB12 with European Union (EU) and United States (US) eculizumab RPs using various analytical methods (more than 40 state-of-the-art assays). Comparisons included purity, product-related impurity, charge heterogeneity, primary structure, post-translational modification, higher-order structure, quantity, Fab-related biological activities (potency and binding activity), and Fc-related biological activities. RESULTS: Based on the analytical similarity assessment, the structural, physicochemical, and biological characterization results demonstrated that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP. In the structural aspects, it was confirmed that there is no difference between post-translational modification profiles and higher-order structures of SB12 compared with the eculizumab RP. Product-related impurities in the form of aggregates and charge variants were also confirmed to be similar. Mechanism of action (MoA)-related biological activities showed that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP with respect to overall critical and non-critical quality attributes analyzed. Moreover, similarity of comparative binding tendency of SB12 and eculizumab RP to Fc gamma receptors and C1q was confirmed through additional characterization methods. Based on these results, SB12 is expected to have highly similar safety and efficacy compared with eculizumab RP. CONCLUSION: In summary, the overall analytical characterization and similarity assessment results show that SB12 is highly similar to the EU and US eculizumab RP in terms of structural, physicochemical, biophysical, and biological attributes.

Biosimilar Competition and Payments in Medicare: The Case of Trastuzumab.

PURPOSE: Numerous biologic drugs will soon be facing biosimilar competition. We study the case of trastuzumab, a revolutionary drug approved in 1998 to treat human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, to understand how trends in the price and treatment cost of the originator brand and biosimilar forms of trastuzumab evolved following biosimilar entry. METHODS: We use average sales price data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, adjusted for inflation to real 2020 dollars using the consumer price index, to describe price changes for the originator biologic and biosimilar versions of trastuzumab between 2019, when the first biosimilar was covered by Medicare, and 2022, when a total of five biosimilar competitors were on the market. We also estimate total treatment costs of biologic and biosimilar forms of trastuzumab from 2005 to 2022 and describe changes in their market share. RESULTS: We find that the first biosimilar entrant's price was 15% lower than the originator brand in 2019, and the fifth biosimilar entrant's price in 2022 was 58% lower than the originator brand in 2019. Contrary to expectations from prior research, the originator biologic price in 2022 decreased 29% from its 2019 average sales price. Average treatment cost for the biologic and biosimilar versions of trastuzumab combined was $45,659 US dollars lower in 2022 compared with the year before biosimilar entry, 2018. Finally, biosimilar market share grew from only 7% in the first year of entry to 32% in the second year, when three biosimilars were on the market. CONCLUSION: Biosimilar entry may be an effective means of decreasing the cost of biologic cancer treatments. Our findings suggest that policies that support biosimilar entry and encourage use may expand access to necessary treatment and reduce health care costs.

Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review.

The development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) biosimilars is a complex process. The key to their successful development and commercialization is an in-depth understanding of the key product attributes that impact safety and efficacy and the strategies to control them. Functional assessment of mAb is a crucial part of the comparability of biopharmaceutical drugs. The development of a relevant and robust functional assay requires an interdisciplinary approach and sufficient flexibility to balance regulatory concerns as well as dynamics and variability during the manufacturing process. Although many advanced tools are available to study and compare the potency and bioactivity of the protein, most of these techniques suffer from major shortcomings that limit their routine use. These include the complexity of the task, establishment of the relevance of the chosen method with the mechanism of action (MOA) of the biosimilar, cost and extended time of analysis, and often the ambiguity in interpretation of the resulting data. To overcome or to address these challenges, the use of multiple orthogonal state-of-the-art techniques is a necessary prerequisite.

Biosimilarity Assessment of 2 Filgrastim Therapeutics in Healthy Volunteers.

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles of a proposed biosimilar and innovator filgrastim therapeutics in healthy volunteers. In a crossover design, 23 subjects received a single subcutaneous injection of 300-µg filgrastim, followed by a 7-day washout period. Assessed pharmacokinetic parameters were the maximum observed filgrastim serum concentration (Cmax ), time to reach Cmax (tmax ), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and elimination half-life. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by the maximum observed absolute neutrophil count effect (Emax ), tmax,E (time to reach Emax ), and the area under the effect of the absolute neutrophil count -time curve. The test/reference ratio (90% confidence intervals) of Cmax of 0.992 (0.860-1.143), AUC0-inf of 0.995 (0.891-1.111), Emax of 0.952 (0.841, 1.078), and area under the effect of the absolute neutrophil count -time curve from time zero to 96 hours of 0.939 (0.854-1.032), were all well within the predefined equivalence boundaries of 80% and 125%. Obtained values for tmax (∼4 hours), tmax,E (∼15 hours), and elimination half-life (∼3.5 hours) were comparable between 2 treatment groups. The local tolerability and incidence of adverse events were comparable, with no clinically meaningful difference between biosimilar and innovator products. Altogether, the results suggested a high similarity of the proposed biosimilar to the innovator filgrastim in healthy volunteers.

Assessment of Structural and Functional Comparability of Biosimilar Products: Trastuzumab as a Case Study.

BACKGROUND: Biotherapeutics are protein products generated using recombinant DNA technology and manufactured in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. It is often said that "the process is the product" and thereby the effect of the manufacturing process is etched on the final product in the form of its heterogeneity. For any biotherapeutic, the acceptable range of the critical quality attributes is defined based on the expected impact of a specific variation on the product stability, safety, and efficacy. For a biosimilar to receive regulatory approval, the manufacturer must demonstrate analytical and clinical comparability with the originator product. As this is mandatory, every biosimilar manufacturer performs this exercise for each biosimilar product under development. However, few reports of thorough evaluation of the quality of biosimilar products are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We examined the structural and functional comparability of biosimilars of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody biotherapeutic. The originator product, Herclon (Roche), was compared with four marketed biosimilars: Trasturel from Reliance Life Sciences, Canmab from Biocon, Vivitra from Zydus Ingenia, Hertraz from Mylan. METHODS: Structural comparability was established using mass spectrometry and spectroscopic techniques such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential light scattering, circular dichroism, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Stability was compared by performing accelerated thermal stress studies. Functional comparability was established via surface plasmon resonance and biological assays such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. RESULTS: With respect to comparability, one biosimilar exhibited significant differences in multiple attributes, such as lower percentage of monomer content and main charge variant species, lower percentage of aglycosylated glycoform G0, and lower estimated potency values. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results indicated general similarity with respect to structure and function, but we found variations with respect to size heterogeneity, charge heterogeneity, and glycosylation pattern in each of the biosimilars.

Multifaceted assessment of rituximab biosimilarity: The impact of glycan microheterogeneity on Fc function.

Biosimilars are poised to reduce prices and increase patient access to expensive, but highly effective biologic products. However, questions still remain about the degree of similarity and scarcity of information on biosimilar products from outside of the US/EU in the public domain. Thus, as an independent entity, we performed a comparative analysis between the innovator, Rituxan® (manufactured by Genentech/Roche), and a Russian rituximab biosimilar, Acellbia® (manufactured by Biocad). We evaluated biosimilarity of these two products by a variety of state-of-the-art analytical mass spectrometry techniques, including tandem MS mapping, HX-MS, IM-MS, and intact MS. Both were found to be generally similar regarding primary and higher order structure, though differences were identified in terms of glycoform distribution levels of C-terminal Lys, N-terminal pyroGlu, charge variants and soluble aggregates. Notably, we confirmed that the biosimilar had a higher level of afucosylated glycans, resulting in a stronger FcγIIIa binding affinity and increased ADCC activity. Taken together, our work provides a comprehensive comparison of Rituxan® and Acellbia®.

Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Early Compared with Late or No Biologic Treatment to Manage Crohn's Disease using Real-World Data.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early [≤2 years after diagnosis] compared with late or no biologic initiation [starting biologics >2 years after diagnosis or no biologic use] for adults with Crohn's disease in Switzerland. METHODS: We developed a Markov cohort model over the patient's lifetime, from the health system and societal perspectives. Transition probabilities, quality of life, and costs were estimated using real-world data. Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability between patients in the early [intervention] and late/no [comparator] biologic initiation strategies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] per quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained is reported in Swiss francs [CHF]. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS: Total costs and QALYs were higher for the intervention [CHF384 607; 16.84 QALYs] compared with the comparator [CHF340 800; 16.75 QALYs] strategy, resulting in high ICERs [health system: CHF887 450 per QALY; societal: CHF449 130 per QALY]. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, assuming a threshold of CHF100 000 per QALY, the probability that the intervention strategy was cost-effective was 0.1 and 0.25 from the health system and societal perspectives, respectively. In addition, ICERs improved when we assumed a 30% reduction in biologic prices [health system: CHF134 502 per QALY; societal: intervention dominant]. CONCLUSIONS: Early biologic use was not cost-effective, considering a threshold of CHF100 000 per QALY compared with late/no biologic use. However, early identification of patients likely to need biologics and future drug price reductions through increased availability of biosimilars may improve the cost-effectiveness of an early treatment approach.

Assessment of the Molecular Mechanism of Action of SB3, a Trastuzumab Biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: SB3, a biosimilar of Herceptin® (trastuzumab, hereinafter referred to as reference product) is currently approved in the EU, Korea, Australia, the USA, and Brazil for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2-positive early and metastatic breast cancer and HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Previously, the biological similarity of SB3 to EU- or US-sourced reference product was assessed using various cell-based and binding assays. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, as a part of its similarity assessment, SB3 was evaluated for additional characteristics related to its molecular mechanism of action (MoA). METHODS: For extracellular effects of SB3, HER2-overexpressing cancer cell lines were used to assess expression of surface HER2, shedding of the extracellular domain of HER2, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) activity. For intracellular effects, Akt phosphorylation and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release were assessed. Additionally, in vitro docetaxel or pertuzumab combination experiments were performed for further characterization; anti-proliferation, HER2/HER3 dimerization inhibition, apoptosis, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays were used. RESULTS: It was confirmed that SB3 is highly similar to the reference products on quality attributes related to extracellular/intracellular efficacy. This similarity was also confirmed during combination studies with docetaxel and pertuzumab. CONCLUSION: Overall, the equivalence of SB3 with reference product in MoA-related qualities in in vitro mono- and combination therapy experiments may support clinical bioequivalence of the two substances.

Are There Benefits and Risks to Biosimilars from a Patient Perspective?

Biosimilars are copies of biologic medications, which no longer are protected by patent, that are intended to be marketed at lower prices than their reference products to increase patient access to treatment. Because a biosimilar must have equivalent pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity with its reference product, the only significant difference between the two should be cost. Lower-priced biosimilars are intended to introduce market competition. The availability of biosimilars should yield savings for the health care system and improve treatment outcomes by expanding patient access to effective medications. However, patients should partake of these cost savings.

Era of biosimilars in rheumatology: reshaping the healthcare environment.

Compared with the original approved biological drug on which it is based, a biosimilar has highly similar physicochemical characteristics and biological activity, as well as equivalent efficacy and no clinically meaningful differences in safety and immunogenicity. Before they are approved, biosimilars must undergo a rigorous development process using state-of-the-art technologies to establish biosimilarity to the reference biological product. After approval, biosimilars must comply with good pharmacological practices for biological drugs. Several biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bsDMARDs) based on the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab have been approved for use in patients with rheumatic diseases. Substantial cost savings can be made if biological-naive patients begin treatment with bsDMARDs, and patients receiving original biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) are switched to bsDMARDs. Despite the consistently similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of bsDMARDs relative to their respective original bDMARDs, switching from a reference bDMARD to a bsDMARD can result in nocebo responses, such as subjective increase of disease activity and pain-related adverse events. This may have a negative impact on adherence to bsDMARDs in clinical trials and clinical practice. To ensure optimal and rational integration of bsDMARDs into rheumatology practice and realise the full cost-saving efficacy of these drugs, rheumatologists must be aware that careful communication of the cost-saving efficacy and safety of bsDMARDs to their patients is the key to a successful long-term switch to bsDMARD therapy.

RGB-02 (biosimilar pegfilgrastim) in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Pegfilgrastim is widely used for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The development and use of biosimilar agents help to rationalize healthcare expenditure and improve access to modern therapies to all who need them. This review focuses on pegfilgrastims with important role in oncology supportive care. RGB-02 (Gedeon Richter) is a proposed biosimilar to pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (Neulasta®, Amgen) with sustained release properties. The clinical analyses in three randomized clinical studies provided comparative data between RGB-02 and Neulasta, in a Phase III study patients receiving docetaxel-doxorubicin chemotherapy treatment equivalence was found. No difference was detected in any safety measure including immunogenicity; treatment switch, from the reference product to RGB-02 proved safe. Long-acting pegylated filgrastim RGB-02 has successfully accomplished various steps of biosimilar development.

Biological Characterization of SB3, a Trastuzumab Biosimilar, and the Influence of Changes in Reference Product Characteristics on the Similarity Assessment.

BACKGROUND: SB3 has been developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeted to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and approved by the European Commission and United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA). During the developmental period of a biosimilar, setting an appropriate quality target is critical for assessing the similarity of the biosimilar product to the reference product. A stepwise approach should be taken to assessing similarity, beginning with extensive characterization of the reference product to establish the quality target. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the similarity of SB3 to the reference product and the impact of changes in the biological profile of the reference product on similarity assessment. METHODS: Analytical similarity was assessed with defined test procedures in terms of critical quality attributes (CQAs) that could affect efficacy, potency, and safety, as well as for the non-CQAs that are related to process consistency. The quality target was established using up to 154 lots of European Union (EU)- and US-sourced Herceptin® (reference product), analyzed during the developmental period of SB3. RESULTS: Trends of the EU- and US-sourced reference product showed that the biological profile exhibited two marked changes for Fc-related attributes, and then recovered to pre-change quality level. Since the similarity range set by pre-change lots was considered most relevant, the changed lots were excluded from establishing the similarity range, which resulted in tightened acceptance criteria. As shown in the results of similarity assessment using the stringent quality target ranges, SB3 exhibits highly similar functional activities compared to the reference product in terms of both CQAs and non-CQAs. CONCLUSION: SB3 has been developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar approved in the EU and USA, and its manufacturing process is deemed to be robust and well-controlled within stringent quality target ranges.

Rapid characterization of structural and functional similarity for a candidate bevacizumab (Avastin) biosimilar using a multipronged mass-spectrometry-based approach.

The ongoing shift from small molecule drugs to protein therapeutics in the pharmaceuticals industry presents a considerable challenge to generic drug developers who are increasingly required to demonstrate biosimilarity for biological macromolecules, a task that is decidedly more complex than doing the same for small molecule drugs. In this work, we demonstrate a multipronged mass-spectrometry-based workflow that allows rapid and facile molecular characterization of antibody-based protein therapeutics, applied to biosimilars development. Specifically, we use a combination of native mass spectrometry (MS), ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), and global time-resolved hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX) to provide an unambiguous assessment of the structural, dynamic, and chemical similarity between Avastin (bevacizumab) and a biosimilar in the late stages of pre-clinical development. Minor structural and dynamic differences between the biosimilar and Avastin, and between lots of the biosimilar, were tested for functional relevance using Surface Plasmon Resonance-derived kinetic and equilibrium binding parameters.

Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of readability and the length of the package leaflets of biosimilars. SETTING: The package leaflets analysed were downloaded from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample included the package leaflets written in English of all the biosimilars that were authorised by the EMA on 31 August 2017, and whose content was available via the internet on that date (n=35). DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The readability of the package leaflets of all biosimilars authorised by the EMA in August 2017 was determined applying the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid formulas. The influence of the following variables on the readability and length was also analysed: package leaflet section, type of biosimilar, date of first authorisation of the biosimilar and type of medicine. RESULTS: A considerable variation of the package leaflets length was found (3154±803). The readability of all the package leaflets overtook the recommended value for health-related written materials taking into account Flesch-Kincaid Index, and none of the package leaflets were easy to understand according to the Flesch Index. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between the sections of package leaflets in readability indices and length. The most difficult sections to understand were those related with the therapeutic indication of medicine and the possible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Package leaflets for authorised biosimilars may not fulfil the function for which they were designed. The competent organisations could be informed about the possible negative effect on the use of this type of medicines.

Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.

Biologics and biosimilars are medicines made from living cells that treat common and serious diseases such as cancer, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory diseases. They are highly targeted, efficacious, and represent an increasingly important part of physicians' armamentaria in the combat against these medical conditions. Yet they are extremely expensive, costing on average $10,000-$30,000 per year and exceed $500,000 for the most expensive biologics. The advent of biosimilar drugs, or high similar copies of biologics, was supposed to help reduce costs, but thus far the cost of treatment with biologics or biosimilars has not fallen sharply in the USA. We argue that a primary hurdle is the extent of patent protection for the reference biologics that impedes greater numbers of biosimilars entering into the market. To date, of the 12 biosimilars approved for marketing by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), only five are commercially available. All but one of the remaining biosimilars are withheld from commercialization due to patent disputes. We argue that the market for biologics and biosimilars will become price competitive only if more biosimilars are available to patients. To this end, the process to eliminate marginally inventive patents held by the reference drug makers must be streamlined and improved. In this perspective article, we suggest actions to improve the pre-FDA approval patent resolution process known as the patent dance, the streamlined patent invalidation process known as Inter Partes Reviews, and the process of granting patents.