Admissions Is Not Enough: The Racial Achievement Gap in Medical Education.

The achievement gap is a disparity in academic and standardized test performance that exists between White and underrepresented minority (URM) students that begins as early as preschool and worsens as students progress through the educational system. Medical education is not immune to this inequality. URM medical students are more likely to experience delayed graduation and course failure, even after accounting for science grade point average and Medical College Admission Test performance. Moreover, URM students are more likely to earn lower scores on licensing examinations, which can have a significant impact on their career trajectory, including specialty choice and residency competitiveness. After the release of preliminary recommendations from the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS) and public commentary on these recommendations, the National Board of Medical Examiners and Federation of State Medical Boards announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 would transition from a 3-digit numeric score to pass/fail scoring. Given that another of InCUS's recommendations was to "minimize racial demographic differences that exist in USMLE performance," it is paramount to consider the impact of this scoring change on URM medical students specifically. Holistic admissions are a step in the right direction of acknowledging that URM students often travel a further distance to reach medical school. However, when residency programs emphasize USMLE performance (or any standardized test score) despite persistent test score gaps, medical education contributes to the disproportionate harm URM students face and bolsters segregation across medical specialties. This Perspective provides a brief explanation of the achievement gap, its psychological consequences, and its consequences in medical education; discusses the potential effect of the Step 1 scoring change on URM medical students; and provides a review of strategies to redress this disparity.

Implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine: Status analysis and development suggestions.

The general public's attitudes, demands, and expectations regarding medical AI could provide guidance for the future development of medical AI to satisfy the increasing needs of doctors and patients. The objective of this study is to investigate public perceptions, receptivity, and demands regarding the implementation of medical AI. An online questionnaire was designed to investigate the perceptions, receptivity, and demands of general public regarding medical AI between October 13 and October 30, 2018. The distributions of the current achievements, public perceptions, receptivity, and demands among individuals in different lines of work (i.e., healthcare vs non-healthcare) and different age groups were assessed by performing descriptive statistics. The factors associated with public receptivity of medical AI were assessed using a linear regression model. In total, 2,780 participants from 22 provinces were enrolled. Healthcare workers accounted for 54.3 % of all participants. There was no significant difference between the healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers in the high proportion (99 %) of participants expressing acceptance of AI (p = 0.8568), but remarkable distributional differences were observed in demands (p < 0.001 for both demands for AI assistance and the desire for AI improvements) and perceptions (p < 0.001 for safety, validity, trust, and expectations). High levels of receptivity (approximately 100 %), demands (approximately 80 %), and expectations (100 %) were expressed among different age groups. The receptivity of medical AI among the non-healthcare workers was associated with gender, educational qualifications, and demands and perceptions of AI. There was a very large gap between current availability of and public demands for intelligence services (p < 0.001). More than 90 % of healthcare workers expressed a willingness to devote time to learning about AI and participating in AI research. The public exhibits a high level of receptivity regarding the implementation of medical AI. To date, the achievements have been rewarding, and further advancements are required to satisfy public demands. There is a strong demand for intelligent assistance in many medical areas, including imaging and pathology departments, outpatient services, and surgery. More contributions are imperative to facilitate integrated and advantageous implementation in medical AI.

Tips for the Budding Esophagologist.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The specialty of gastroenterology has evolved such that there are now multiple areas of "superspecialty" within the field. Interest in "esophagology" has expanded as options for medical therapy, advanced optics, motility testing and reflux monitoring, and minimally invasive and endoscopic therapeutics have grown. For a multitude of reasons, academic and private practices alike are looking to expand in this growing superspecialty. RECENT FINDINGS: Several articles offer criteria for competency in manometry. This article discusses in detail multiple options for developing skills in diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disease with "tips for the budding esophagologist."

Beware bandwagons! The bandwagon phenomenon in medicine, psychiatry and management.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the literature on bandwagons, fashions and fads in the fields of medicine, psychiatry and health management. CONCLUSIONS: The bandwagon effect appears to operate across medicine, psychiatry and health management, often to the detriment of patients and health organisations. The authors provide advice on recognising and managing this phenomenon.

Modeling the Potential Impact of Changing Access Rates to Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Dependence for Local Authorities in England: The Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Model (STreAM).

OBJECTIVE: We modeled the impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates to different treatment pathways on the future prevalence of alcohol dependence, treatment outcomes, service capacity, costs, and mortality. METHOD: Local Authority numbers and the prevalence of people "potentially in need of assessment for and treatment in specialist services for alcohol dependence" (PINASTFAD) are estimated by mild, moderate, severe, and complex needs. Administrative data were used to estimate the Specialist Treatment Access Rate per PINASTFAD person and classify 22 different treatment pathways. Other model inputs include natural remission, relapse after treatment, service costs, and mortality rates. "What-if" analyses assess changes to Specialist Treatment Access Rates and treatment pathways. Model outputs include the numbers and prevalence of people who are PINASTFAD, numbers treated by 22 pathways, outcomes (successful completion with abstinence, successfully moderated nonproblematic drinking, re-treatment within 6 months, dropout, transfer, custody), mortality rates, capacity requirements (numbers in contact with community services or staying in residential or inpatient places), total treatment costs, and general health care savings. Five scenarios illustrate functionality: (a) no change, (b) achieve access rates at the 70th percentile nationally, (c) increase access by 25%, (d) increase access to Scotland rate, and (e) reduce access by 25%. RESULTS: At baseline, 14,581 people are PINASTFAD (2.43% of adults) and the Specialist Treatment Access Rate is 10.84%. The 5-year impact of scenarios on PINASTFAD numbers (vs. no change) are (B) reduced by 191 (-1.3%), (C) reduced by 477 (-3.3%), (D) reduced by almost 2,800 (-19.2%), and (E) increased by 533 (+3.6%). The relative impact is similar for other outputs. CONCLUSIONS: Decision makers can estimate the potential impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates for alcohol dependence.

Medical-Legal Partnership Impact on Parents' Perceived Stress: A Pilot Study.

Stress has adverse effects on health, and prolonged stress exposure is a risk factor for several mental and physical illnesses. 1 Families living in poverty face many stressors created and maintained by economic hardship and unaddressed legal and social needs. Medical-Legal Partnerships (MLPs) aim to improve health and well-being by addressing health-harming legal and social needs of patients. This pilot study examined whether MLP-involved parents perceived themselves as stressed; to what they attributed their stress; and whether they reported a reduction in stress when their MLP cases were closed. The study shows improvements in perceived stress following receipt of MLP interventions.

Medical student contact with specialty trainees: Missing out in general practice?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical students on clinical placements value positive experiences with specialty trainees. We aimed to document student contact with general practice registrars and other specialty registrars and any relationship between this contact and student career interests. METHOD: Medical students were surveyed following their general practice, general medicine, general surgery, psychiatry and medicine-in-society placements. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four students completed the survey (73% response rate). Participants reported substantially less contact with general practice registrars and rural generalist trainees than with other registrars. Compared with students placed in regional areas, metropolitan students were more likely to have no contact at all with general practice registrars. Interest in specialty careers was correlated with interest in knowing more about specialty training, but not with the extent of contact with registrars or personal connections in any specialty studied. DISCUSSION: Student exposure to general practice registrars in at least one Australian medical school is relatively low. Opportunities to increase this should be explored. Students themselves may have little influence over their contact with specialty trainees, despite valuing it highly.

Groundhog Day for Medical Artificial Intelligence.

Following a boom in investment and overinflated expectations in the 1980s, artificial intelligence entered a period of retrenchment known as the "AI winter." With advances in the field of machine learning and the availability of large datasets for training various types of artificial neural networks, AI is in another cycle of halcyon days. Although medicine is particularly recalcitrant to change, applications of AI in health care have professionals in fields like radiology worried about the future of their careers and have the public tittering about the prospect of soulless machines making life-and-death decisions. Medicine thus appears to be at an inflection point-a kind of Groundhog Day on which either AI will bring a springtime of improved diagnostic and predictive practices or the shadow of public and professional fear will lead to six more metaphorical weeks of winter in medical AI.

Staying Power: Does the Uniformed Services University Continue to Meet Its Obligation to the Nation's Health Care Needs?

INTRODUCTION: The Uniformed Services University F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine just passed its 45th anniversary, opening in 1972. A goal of the medical school, like those nationally, is the production of high-quality physicians. The purpose of this study is to describe the practice characteristics of our USU graduates and to compare data with the national cohort of U.S. MD graduates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To accomplish this, we performed a retrospective analysis of U.S. graduates (1980-2009). We used the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile to describe our graduates' current practice profile and compare them with the national cohort. In order to ascertain if USU is meeting our goal to provide high-quality physicians, we also compare our findings with national allopathic school data to norm-reference our results. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that USU graduates contribute to both primary care and specialty care and they practice in all 50 states. USU graduates continue to serve their nation after their obligation is complete, with 64% continuing to practice in federal hospitals and agencies. USU graduates also have a higher board certification rate (90%) than the national cohort (88%). CONCLUSION: Following our 45th anniversary, we provide continuing evidence that USU is keeping its contract with society. We provide evidence that USU continues to meet its obligation to the nation's health care needs by producing high-quality physicians who serve the country in multiple ways after their military obligation is complete, thus extending the definition of staying power. Our study is not without limitations. First, we could not precisely define the cohort to exclude graduates who still had service obligations. Second, the AMA Physician Masterfile had some missing data fields, so nonresponse or misclassification bias is possible in our results. Study strengths include the long period of time and large number of graduates in each cohort.

Medicina evolucionista en terapia intensiva: un nuevo paradigma / (Evolutionary medicine in critical care: a new paradigm)

Resumen Los avances tecnológicos han permitido la supervivencia de pacientes críticamente enfermos que hubieran fallecido de manera inevitable. No obstante, muchas de las medidas de este tratamiento intensivo son riesgosas y con un alto costo material y de esfuerzo humano. La medicina evolucionista es una tendencia mundial que propone que un alto número de alteraciones del paciente corresponden a respuestas de adaptación con el objetivo de la supervivencia y no requieren obligatoriamente de su normalización. En el caso del paciente críticamente enfermo, este enfoque es innovador y podría conducir a una medicina crítica orientada al reconocimiento de estas respuestas adaptativas y su modulación. Esta nueva forma de interpretar las manifestaciones de la enfermedad puede tener importantes repercusiones en su tratamiento y una utilización más racional de los recursos. La aplicación de este paradigma puede mejorar los resultados hasta ahora no óptimos, en condiciones como shock séptico, en las que medidas consideradas como lógicas o racionales han sido inefectivas. Se presenta una revisión sobre los principios de esta tendencia, evidencia que la apoya, algunas hipótesis sobre su aplicación en casos concretos y sus limitaciones.

Abstract Technological advances have allowed the survival of critically ill patients who otherwise would have inevitably died. However, many of the measures of this intensive treatment are risky and with a high material cost and human effort. Evolutionary medicine is a worldwide trend that proposes that a high number of patient alterations correspond to adaptation responses with the aim of survival and do not necessarily require their normalization. In the case of the critically ill patient, this approach is innovative and could lead to a critical medicine aimed at the recognition of these adaptive responses and their modulation. This new way of interpreting the manifestations of the disease can have important repercussions in its treatment and a more rational use of resources. The application of this paradigm can improve the results so far not optimal, in conditions such as septic shock, in which measures considered logical or rational have been ineffective. This review presents the principles of this trend, the supporting evidence, some hypotheses about its application in specific cases as well as its limitations.

Neuroendovascular Fellowship Training: Self-Assessment of a Program Accredited by the Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training.

The University at Buffalo's neuroendovascular fellowship is one of the longest running fellowship programs in North America. The burgeoning neurointerventional workforce and the rapid growth in the neurointerventional space on the heels of groundbreaking clinical trials prompted us to assess the fellowship's academic impact and its graduates' perceptions and productivity. An anonymized web-based survey was sent to all former neuroendovascular fellows with specific questions pertaining to current practice, research and funding, and perceptions about the fellowship's impact on their skills, competitiveness, and compensation. Additionally, the h-index was calculated to assess the academic productivity of each graduated fellow. Among 50 former fellows, 42 (84%) completed the survey. The fellows came from various countries, ethnic backgrounds, and specialties including neurosurgery (n = 39, 93%), neurology (n = 2, 5%), and neuroradiology (n = 1, 2%). Twenty (48%) respondents were currently chairs or directors of their practice. Most (n = 30, 71%) spent at least 10% of their time on research activities, with 27 (64%) receiving research funding. The median h-index of all 50 former fellows was 14. The biggest gains from the fellowship were reported to be improvement in endovascular skills (median = 10 on a scale of 0-10 [highest]) and increase in competitiveness for jobs in vascular neurosurgery (median = 10), followed by increase in academic productivity (median = 8), and knowledge of vascular disease (median = 8). In an era with open calls for moratoriums on endovascular fellowships, concerns over market saturation, and pleas to improve training, fellowship programs perhaps merit a more objective assessment. The effectiveness of a fellowship program may best be measured by the academic impact and leadership roles of former fellows.