Global assessment of military and civilian trauma systems integration: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The global burden of trauma disproportionately affects low-income countries and middle-income countries (LMIC), with variability in trauma systems between countries. Military and civilian healthcare systems have a shared interest in building trauma capacity for use during peace and war. However, in LMICs it is largely unknown if and how these entities work together. Understanding the successful integration of these systems can inform partnerships that can strengthen trauma care. This scoping review aims to identify examples of military-civilian trauma systems integration and describe the methods, domains, and indicators associated with integration including barriers and facilitators. METHODS: A scoping review of all appropriate databases was performed to identify papers with evidence of military and civilian trauma systems integration. After manuscripts were selected for inclusion, relevant data was extracted and coded into methods of integration, domains of integration, and collected information regarding indicators of integration, which were further categorized into facilitators or barriers. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies were included with authors from 18 countries describing experiences in 23 countries. There was a predominance of authorship and experiences from High-Income Countries (91.9 and 75.7%, respectively). Five key domains of integration were identified; Academic Integration was the most common (45.9%). Among indicators, the most common facilitator was administrative support and the lack of this was the most common barrier. The most common method of integration was Collaboration (50%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence demonstrates the existence of military and civilian trauma systems integration in several countries. High-income country data dominates the literature, and thus a more robust understanding of trauma systems integration, inclusive of all geographic locations and income statuses, is necessary prior to development of a framework to guide integration. Nonetheless, the facilitators identified in this study describe the factors and environment in which integration is feasible and highlight optimal indicators of entry.

Military Medicine's Value to US Health Care and Public Health: Bringing Battlefield Lessons Home.

Importance: Military medicine in the US was established to treat wounded and ill service members and to protect the health and well-being of our military forces at home and abroad. To accomplish these tasks, it has developed the capacity to rapidly adapt to the changing nature of war and emerging health threats; throughout our nation's history, innovations developed by military health professionals have been quickly adopted by civilian medicine and public health for the benefit of patients in the US and around the world. Observations: From the historical record and published studies, we cite notable examples of how military medicine has advanced civilian health care and public health. We also describe how military medicine research and development differs from that done in the civilian world. During the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, military medicine's focused approach to performance improvement and requirements-driven research cut the case fatality rate from severe battlefield wounds in half, to the lowest level in the history of warfare. Conclusions and Relevance: Although innovations developed by military medicine regularly inform and improve civilian health care and public health, the architects of these advances and the methods they use are often overlooked. Enhanced communication and cooperation between our nation's military and civilian health systems would promote reciprocal learning, accelerate collaborative research, and strengthen our nation's capacity to meet a growing array of health and geopolitical threats.

ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE DETERIORATION OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION DURING HOSTILITIES.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: Scientific substantiation of the methodology for predicting the consequences of the worsening of the epidemic situation on the territory of Ukraine during military operations for the timely adoption of measures for the medical protection of military personnel in conditions of biological contamination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Determination and generalization of the impact of biological contamination due to the use of biological weapons were carried out considering the main determinants of the epidemic process using the index and coefficient of medical protection. Applied methods of scientific research: epidemiological, system, and information approach. RESULTS: Results: The authors proposed indicators that consider the pathogenicity of the infectious agent, contagiousness, the degree of non-specific protection of servicemen, specific protection of servicemen, and the sanitary-epidemiological state of the area of operations of troops (forces). Relevant epidemic situations were simulated, and the index and coefficient of medical protection were calculated to predict the consequences of the worsening of the epidemic situation to make timely decisions regarding the implementation of medical protection measures for military personnel in conditions of biological contamination during the repulsion of armed aggression. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: In the conditions of biological contamination, when biological weapons and biological terrorism are used, the epidemic process in the army is intensified, which requires timely decisions regarding the implementation of medical protection measures for military personnel in conditions of biological contamination.

A Comparison of HPSP and USU Graduates' Preparation for Residency.

INTRODUCTION: Military medical students enter residency through two main pathways: (1) The Uniformed Services University (USU) and (2) the Armed Services Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP). The purpose of this study was to compare how these two pathways prepare military medical students for residency. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 experienced military residency program directors (PDs) in order to explore their perceptions of the preparedness of USU and HPSP graduates. We used a transcendental phenomenological qualitative research design to bracket our biases and guide our data analysis. Our research team coded each of the interview transcripts. We then organized these codes into themes, which served as the results of our study. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from our data regarding the residents' preparedness: (1) Ability to navigate the military culture, (2) understanding of the military's medical mission, (3) clinical preparation, (4) ability to navigate the Military Health System (MHS), and (5) teamwork. The PDs described how USU graduates better understand the military's medical mission and are more easily able to navigate the military culture and the MHS because of their lived experiences during military medical school. They also discussed the various levels of clinical preparation of HPSP graduates, in contrast to the USU graduates' more consistent skills and abilities. Finally, the PDs believed both groups to be strong team players. CONCLUSIONS: USU students were consistently prepared for a strong start to residency because of their military medical school training. HPSP students often experienced a steep learning curve because of the newness of the military culture and MHS.

Optimizing combat readiness for military surgeons without trauma fellowship training: Engaging the "voluntary faculty" model.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate operative volume remains a critical component in mitigating surgical atrophy and maintaining clinical competency. The initiation of military-civilian surgical partnerships (MCPs) has been proposed for addressing knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) metrics to address concerns over operational readiness and the low acuity experienced by military surgeons. This study investigates the first partnership for Navy surgical staff at a nonacademic Military Treatment Facility (MTF) with a regional academic Army Military Treatment Facility (AMTF) and a civilian, nonacademic level II trauma center devised to improve operational readiness for attending surgeons. We hypothesize that a skill sustainment MCP will allow military surgeons to meet combat readiness standards as measured by the KSA metric. METHODS: A memorandum of understanding was initiated between the Navy Military Treatment Facility (NMTF), the AMTF, and the level II civilian trauma center (CTC). The single military surgeon in this study was classified as "voluntary faculty" at the CTC. Total case volume and acuity were recorded over an 11-month period. Knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics were calculated using the standard national provider identifier number and the novel case-log based method. RESULTS: A total of 156 cases were completed by a single surgeon over the study period, averaging 52 cases per institution. Significantly more KSAs were obtained at the CTC compared with NMTF (5,954 vs. 2,707; p < 0.001). Significantly more emergent cases were observed at the CTC compared with the MTFs (χ 2 = 7.1, n = 96, p < 0.05). At a single site, AMTF, a significant difference in the calculated KSA score, was observed between the national provider identifier and case-log methods (5,278 vs. 3,297; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The skill sustainment MCP between NMTF and CTC increased surgical readiness and exposed surgeons to increased operative acuity. The voluntary faculty model reduces direct litigation exposure and encourages clinical competency for military surgeons while remaining a deployable asset to the global military effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Addressing HPSP Learner Needs: A Pilot Study of a "Fundamentals of Military Medicine" Course.

INTRODUCTION: Military medicine is uniquely different from civilian medicine, and military physicians in the USA are primarily recruited through the Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS). Medical students at the USUHS receive more than 650 hours of military-specific curriculum and spend 21 days engaged in field exercises. HPSP students complete two 4-week officer training sessions during their 4 years of medical school. There is a clear discrepancy in preparation for military medicine between HPSP and USUHS students. The USUHS School of Medicine undertook an initiative to develop a fully online self-paced course on the fundamentals of military medicine topics to help HPSP students bridge the gap in their preparation. This article will describe how the online self-paced course was designed and present feedback from the pilot offering of this course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As proof of concept of the effectiveness of an online self-paced course for teaching the fundamentals of military medicine to HPSP students, two chapters from the "Fundamentals of Military Medicine" published by the Borden Institute were transferred to an online format. Each chapter was offered as a module. In addition to the chapters, an introduction and closing module were added to the pilot course. The pilot course was offered over 6 weeks. Data for this study were obtained from module feedback surveys, pre- and post-course quizzes, participant focus groups, and course evaluation surveys. Pre- and post-test scores were analyzed to evaluate content knowledge. The open-ended survey questions on the feedback forms and focus group transcripts were collated and analyzed as textual data. RESULTS: Fifty-six volunteers enrolled in the study, and 42 completed the pre- and post-course quizzes. This participant pool included HPSP students (79%, n = 44) and military residents in civilian graduate medical education programs (21%, n = 12). The module feedback surveys showed that most participants spent 1 to 3 hours on each of the modules, which they rated as extremely or quite reasonable (Module 1: 64%, Module 2: 86%, Module 3: 83%). There was not much difference between the overall quality of the three modules. The participants found content on application to the military-specific context very valuable. Of the different course elements, video content was rated as the most effective. Participant feedback clearly highlighted that HPSP students want a course that informs them about the fundamentals of military medicine and demonstrates how the information would apply to their lives. Overall, the course was effective. HPSP students showed knowledge gains and self-reported satisfaction with the course's objectives. They were able to locate information easily and understand the course expectations. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study has shown that there is a need for a course that provides the fundamentals of military medicine to HPSP students. A fully online self-paced course provides flexibility for the students and improves access.

Ukraine's Experience with Management of Combat Casualties Using NATO's Four-Tier "Changing as Needed" Healthcare System.

INTRODUCTION: The full-scale war with Russia on the territory of Ukraine has revealed several problems related to care of the wounded. In this article, we summarize the mechanisms of injury and injuries sustained for the period February to April 2022, focusing on extremity injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared these to a period of lower-intensity warfare in 2014-2021. In both cases, we report patients treated by the National Military Medical Clinical Center (NMMCC) in Kyiv. We also sought to evaluate the care of the wounded from an organizational viewpoint, taking into account the four-level system of care also used by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Third, we sought to understand lessons learned that could improve the care of the wounded. CONCLUSION: During the 2022 conflict, the percentage of patients with extremity wounds who had long bone fractures increased and the percentage of people with long bone fractures who had bone defects increased, compared with 2014-2021. This may be due to the higher blast energy from the weapons used in the current conflict. Second, we adapted the four-level NATO system of care. Level 2 (first level hospital) care was provided by civilian hospitals close to the fighting, rather than mobile military hospitals. Level 3 (specialized) and 4 (highly specialized) care were combined into one hospital (NMMCC). This is the first description of flexible use of NATO's four levels. Finally, a major lesson learned was the need to improve use of damage control surgery.

Battlefield Triage and Resource Allocation during a Pandemic: Learning from the Past and Adapting for the Future.

The principle of medical triage, where patients are sorted into categories to guide the order in which they receive treatment, dates back to Baron Dominique Jean Larrey, the surgeon general of Napolean's armies. The concept evolved with military conflicts throughout the 19th century, was subsequently adapted to situations off the battlefield, and is now widely practiced where resources are limited.2 Military medical providers are taught triage principles early in their careers and its use is routinely integrated into military training scenarios and operational planning.

An Assessment of Nursing Skills Required for Sustaining a Casualty during Prolonged Casualty Care: Implications for Training and Preparing for the Next Major War.

BACKGROUND: The US military is transitioning rapidly from the Global War on Terrorism in preparation for near-peer combat in a multidomain operations (MDO) and/or large scale combat operations (LSCO) setting. Due to potentially contested freedom of movement in this setting, casualty evacuation may be significantly delayed, resulting in medics and other prehospital medical personnel taking on patient care duties normally performed by nurses in a hospital-based setting. However, the frequency of nursing-type care remains unclear. We seek to determine the nursing interventions typically performed in a facility with patient holding capability during the first 72 hours of care in the deployed setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of previously described data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry of US and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military personnel from January 2007 to March 2020 with a focus on relevant nursing procedures identified in current Individual Critical Task Lists (ICTL) for critical care, emergency, medical-surgical nurses, and combat medics. RESULTS: Among all casualties, the most common nursing-related skills performed in the prehospital setting were wound dressing application (33%), administration of parenteral opioids (35%), and administration of ketamine (7%); in the hospital setting were preparation for transfer (60%), managing a post-operative patient (59%), and managing a traumatic brain injury (44%). In the hospital setting, most patients had a blood gas performed (73%), ventilator management occurred for 21% of patients, and administration of packed red blood cells occurred for 21% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing-type interventions were frequently required during the first 72 hours of casualty care. The frequency of the required interventions demonstrates the need for ongoing nursing skills training for medics supporting casualties in the setting of prolonged casualty care.

Design and Assessment of a Mobile Health Care Solution for the Military Pediatrician: The DHA Pediatrics App.

INTRODUCTION: Mobile health technology design and use by patients and clinicians have rapidly evolved in the past 20 years. Nevertheless, the technology has remained in silos of practices, patients, and individual institutions. Uptake across integrated health systems has lagged. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2015, the authors designed a mobile health application (App) aimed at augmenting the capabilities of clinicians who care for children within the Military Health System (MHS). This App incorporated a curated, system-based collection of Clinical Practice Guidelines, access to emergency resuscitation cards, call buttons for local market subspecialty and inpatient teams, links to residency academic calendars, and other web-based resources. Over the next 5 years, three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles facilitated multiple enhancements for the App which eventually transitioned from the Android/iOS stores to a web browser. The "People At the Centre of Mobile Application Development" tool which has validity evidence captured user experience. The team assessed the App's global effectiveness using Google Analytics. A speed test measured time saved and accuracy of task completion for clinicians using the App compared to non-users. Finally, MHS medical librarians critiqued the App using a questionnaire with validity evidence. The Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Institutional Review Board reviewed the study and deemed it exempt. RESULTS: Clinician respondents (n = 68 complete responses across six MTFs, 51% graduate medical trainees representing a 7.4% response rate of active duty pediatrician forces) perceived the App to have appropriate qualities of efficiency, effectiveness, learnability, memorability, errors, satisfaction, and cognitive properties following App use in clinical practice. Google Analytics demonstrated more than 1,000 unique users on the App from May 1, 2020 to January 20, 2021. There were 746 instances (26% of all sessions) when a user navigated between more than one military treatment facility. App users were faster and more accurate at task completion during a digital scavenger hunt. Medical librarians measured the App to have acceptable usefulness, accuracy, authority, objectivity, timeliness, functionality, design, security, and value. CONCLUSIONS: The App appears to be an effective tool to extend a clinician's capabilities and inter-professional communication between world-wide users and six MHS markets. This App was designed-and used-for a large health care network across a wide geographic footprint. Next steps are establishing an enduring chain of App champions for continued updates and sharing the App's code with other military medical disciplines and interested civilian centers.

Reducing Setup and Turnover Times in the OR With an Innovative Sterilization Container: Implications for the COVID-19 Era Military Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: The global 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is setting unprecedented demands on the nation and the military and surgical services. Surgical demands include a large backlog of surgical cases, strain on available resources, and the need for additional measures to prevent exposure. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the feasibility, duration, adverse events, and potential gains associated with using a Turbett Sterilization Pod (TSP) for total joint replacements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act model to guide this project. A time-motion study was completed in the operating room (OR) to measure the average time required to set up surgical instrumentation for total joint replacement cases that required 12 or more instrument trays. We compared the amount of time it took to complete the setting up of instrumentation using the traditional method versus the TSP method. The traditional method consisted of unwrapping each surgical tray, checking for holes in the blue wrapper, and placing the tray on the back table. In the case of the TSP, the door of the pod was opened, and the instrument trays were transferred directly to the back table. We measured the time the staff took to perform the task using each of these methods. RESULTS: When compared to the traditional method, the use of the TSP resulted in improved turnover time, decreased room setup time, reduced environmental waste, and eliminated both the effect of damage to wrappers and the time previously spent wrapping surgical trays. CONCLUSION: The TSP minimizes the time needed by the staff to set up an OR suite for a total joint replacement, therefore permitting them to focus more on direct patient care. This time improvement suggests that all surgical specialties, including those requiring greater than 12 traditional instrument sets, may experience reduced turnover time between cases. The use of the TSP is one means to help rectify the OR backlog brought on by COVID-19.

Medical services policy in respect of detainees: evolution and outstanding issues.

Alleged and confirmed abuse of civilians arrested or detained by the UK Armed Forces has been the subject of four formal enquiries, and all have used medical evidence and/or addressed medical issues. After the first three, robust policies were put in place to ensure that all those arrested had appropriate medical examinations and that healthcare personnel acted appropriately. However, by the time of the Second Gulf War, the training and medical processes had lapsed and were found to be a contributory factor in not preventing abuse. The fourth enquiry has endorsed most of the lapsed policies but is ambiguous in two areas-on medical certification of fitness for interrogation and the timing to the first medical examination. This article summarises the medical aspects of the four enquiries and discusses the two ambiguous areas, arguing that to diverge from the policies eventually put in place in Northern Ireland is a retrograde step. It also discusses how training put in place to avoid the very events which occurred in the Second Gulf was discontinued.

Fellowship in Immediate Medical Care examination: applicability to the Defence Medical Services.

The Fellowship in Immediate Medical Care (FIMC) is the highest level of formal qualification available for pre-hospital practitioners, aiming to test the knowledge, technical and non-technical skills of those providing specialist Pre-Hospital Emergency Care (PHEC). The FIMC is a multiprofessional examination with the potential to support continuous quality improvement of the PHEC that the Defence Medical Services (DMS) can offer to our patients now and in the future. The aim of this article is to inform the readership about the evolution of the FIMC examination and its applicability to military clinicians (and their civilian counterparts). A secondary aim is to inform those who are preparing for the examination.

The principle of salvage in the context of COVID-19.

The prioritisation of scarce resources has a particular urgency within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. This paper sets out a hypothetical case of Patient X (who is a nurse) and Patient Y (who is a non-health care worker). They are both in need of a ventilator due to COVID-19 with the same clinical situation and expected outcomes. However, there is only one ventilator available. In addressing the question of who should get priority, the proposal is made that the answer may lie in how the pandemic is metaphorically described using military terms. If nursing is understood to take place at the 'frontline' in the 'battle' against COVID-19, a principle of military medical ethics-namely the principle of salvage-can offer guidance on how to prioritise access to a life-saving resource in such a situation. This principle of salvage purports a moral direction to return wounded soldiers back to duty on the battlefield. Applying this principle to the hypothetical case, this paper proposes that Patient X (who is a nurse) should get priority of access to the ventilator so that he/she can return to the 'frontline' in the fight against COVID-19.

A Methodology for Estimating the Cost of Educating Military Physicians at the Uniformed Services University.

INTRODUCTION: The Department of Defense (DoD) operates a large, multi-channeled physician accession pipeline to maintain a professional workforce of over 10,000 active duty physicians. The Uniformed Services University (USU) operates the nation's only federal medical school providing trained doctors to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Public Health Service. Although the school serves an essential purpose, policymakers question the cost of operating the University's medical school. One challenge is to develop reproducible and transparent costing methods that can be used to evaluate the University's value and efficiency. METHODS: This work proposes a replicable methodology for estimating the cost per student-year at USU. Using detailed data from USU encompassing facility use, budgeting and expenditures, and faculty and student rosters, we break out and attribute costs to the University's component schools. Using faculty and staff time-use surveys, we further break out education-related personnel costs from other University activities such as research and service. We can then calculate the School of Medicine's annual cost to educate a uniformed physician. RESULTS: In Fiscal Year 2017, it cost the DoD approximately $253,000 per year (more than $1 million dollars total over a 4-year curriculum) to directly educate a physician though the USU School of Medicine. Data from the following Fiscal Year show that education costs grew a modest 2.1% per student-year. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a foundational framework and approach to estimate the costs of accessioning a physician at USU. This methodology can be replicated for subsequent value analyses of physician accession and retention as budgetary pressures change to match the DoD operating environment. Uniformed Services University's costs should be periodically reassessed against those of alternative accession sources.