Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 106
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Liege ; 79(5-6): 269-276, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869110

RESUMO

Faced with the multiple challenges impacting the Belgian healthcare system - notably the aging of the population, the increase in chronic diseases and growing social inequalities in health - the development of a disruptive preventive approach rooted in health promotion is essential to address the population's health problems in a cross-sectional and intersectoral way. However, the scant attention paid to prevention and promotion in the Belgian political landscape (only 3 % of healthcare expenditure), accentuated by the fragmentation of its deployment between the various political-institutional entities (Federal Authority, Communities and Regions), represents a significant limitation. New opportunities, supported in particular by "4P medicine", are paving the way for a modernization of preventive approaches. However, this new way of conceiving prevention will only be beneficial to the community, in all its diversity and complexity, if it re-engages with the fundamentals of health promotion.


Devant les multiples défis auxquels est confronté le système de santé belge - notamment le vieillissement de la population, la progression des maladies chroniques, l'accroissement des inégalités sociales de santé - le développement d'une approche préventive disruptive, qui trouve ses fondements dans la promotion de la santé, est essentiel pour aborder, de façon transversale et intersectorielle, les problèmes de santé de la population. Toutefois, la faible place accordée à la prévention et à la promotion dans le paysage politique belge (seulement 3 % des dépenses de santé), accentuée par un éclatement de son déploiement entre les différentes entités politico-institutionnelles (Autorité fédérale, Communautés et Régions), représente des limites non négligeables. De nouvelles opportunités, notamment soutenues par une «médecine des 4P¼, ouvrent la voie à une modernisation des approches préventives. Toutefois, cette nouvelle façon de concevoir la prévention ne sera profitable à la collectivité, prise dans sa diversité et sa complexité, qu'à la condition de se réancrer dans les fondamentaux inhérents à la promotion de la santé.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Bélgica , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/normas
2.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439391

RESUMO

To improve quality and efficiency of primary health care and to strengthen its preventive directivity is possible through health care modernization including implementation of management technologies, development of database for evaluation and control. The purpose of the study is to develop method of evaluating activity of stomatologic clinic. The methodology was based on concepts of "functional systems" and "decision making". The listing of informative criteria was based on data analysis of functioning of stomatologic service of the Chechen Republic in 2002-2016 and results of sociological survey of stomatologists (n=181), health care administrators in stomatology (n=45), paramedics (n=220) and patients (n=359). The experts (n=13) developed required number of criteria and their gradation. The algorithm of evaluating activity of stomatologic clinic was developed using systematic approach. The listing of 52 criteria and their 10 blocks were established. The experts established coefficients of significance of criteria (0.0084-0.0781; ≥0.0224 - more significant, <0.0224 - less significant). Three levels were determined for each criterion (according principle of minimization) that became a basis for calculation of integrated indicator of efficiency of functioning of stomatologic polyclinic. The expanded methodological approaches ensure comparartivity of estimates of stomatologic polyclinic in various time periods. The health care authorities have opportunity to objectify analysis of functioning of a number of polyclinics in different periods.


Assuntos
Medicina Bucal , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Tomada de Decisões , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Medicina Bucal/normas , Federação Russa , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Value Health ; 24(5): 632-640, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the overall quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by averting 1 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection over the duration of the pandemic. METHODS: A cohort-based probabilistic simulation model, informed by the latest epidemiological estimates on COVID-19 in the United States provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and literature review. Heterogeneity of parameter values across age group was accounted for. The main outcome studied was QALYs for the infected patient, patient's family members, and the contagion effect of the infected patient over the duration of the pandemic. RESULTS: Averting a COVID-19 infection in a representative US resident will generate an additional 0.061 (0.016-0.129) QALYs (for the patient: 0.055, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.014-0.115; for the patient's family members: 0.006, 95% CI 0.002-0.015). Accounting for the contagion effect of this infection, and assuming that an effective vaccine will be available in 3 months, the total QALYs gains from averting 1 single infection is 1.51 (95% CI 0.28-4.37) accrued to patients and their family members affected by the index infection and its sequelae. These results were robust to most parameter values and were most influenced by effective reproduction number, probability of death outside the hospital, the time-varying hazard rates of hospitalization, and death in critical care. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the health benefits of averting 1 COVID-19 infection in the United States are substantial. Efforts to curb infections must weigh the costs against these benefits.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Estados Unidos
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 5304, 2021 03 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33674627

RESUMO

We propose a novel data-driven framework for assessing the a-priori epidemic risk of a geographical area and for identifying high-risk areas within a country. Our risk index is evaluated as a function of three different components: the hazard of the disease, the exposure of the area and the vulnerability of its inhabitants. As an application, we discuss the case of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. We characterize each of the twenty Italian regions by using available historical data on air pollution, human mobility, winter temperature, housing concentration, health care density, population size and age. We find that the epidemic risk is higher in some of the Northern regions with respect to Central and Southern Italy. The corresponding risk index shows correlations with the available official data on the number of infected individuals, patients in intensive care and deceased patients, and can help explaining why regions such as Lombardia, Emilia-Romagna, Piemonte and Veneto have suffered much more than the rest of the country. Although the COVID-19 outbreak started in both North (Lombardia) and Central Italy (Lazio) almost at the same time, when the first cases were officially certified at the beginning of 2020, the disease has spread faster and with heavier consequences in regions with higher epidemic risk. Our framework can be extended and tested on other epidemic data, such as those on seasonal flu, and applied to other countries. We also present a policy model connected with our methodology, which might help policy-makers to take informed decisions.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ciência de Dados/métodos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/virologia , Geografia , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Formulação de Políticas , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Fatores de Tempo
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2011677, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32716515

RESUMO

Importance: Primary care physicians have limited time to discuss preventive care, but it is unknown how they prioritize recommended services. Objective: To understand primary care physicians' prioritization of preventive services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This online survey was administered to primary care physicians in a large health care system from March 17 to May 12, 2017. Physicians were asked whether they prioritize preventive services and which factors contribute to their choice (5-point Likert scale). Results were analyzed from July 8, 2017, to September 19, 2019. Exposures: A 2 × 2 factorial design of 2 hypothetical patients: (1) a 50-year-old white woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of breast cancer; and (2) a 45-year-old black man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of colorectal cancer. Two visit lengths (40 minutes vs 20 minutes) were given. Each patient was eligible for at least 11 preventive services. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physicians rated their likelihood of discussing each service during the visit and reported their top 3 priorities for patients 1 and 2. Physician choices were compared with the preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy, using a previously published mathematical model. Results: Of 241 physicians, 137 responded (57%), of whom 74 (54%) were female and 85 (62%) were younger than 50 years. Physicians agreed they prioritized preventive services (mean score, 4.27 [95% CI, 4.12-4.42] of 5.00), mostly by ability to improve quality (4.56 [95% CI, 4.44-4.68] of 5.00) or length (4.53 [95% CI, 4.40-4.66] of 5.00) of life. Physicians reported more prioritization in the 20- vs 40-minute visit, indicating that they were likely to discuss fewer services during the shorter visit (median, 5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-8] vs 11 [IQR, 9-13] preventive services for patient 1, and 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 9 [IQR, 8-11] for patient 2). Physicians reported similar top 3 priorities for both patients: smoking cessation, hypertension control, and glycemic control for patient 1 and smoking cessation, hypertension control, and colorectal cancer screening for patient 2. Physicians' top 3 priorities did not usually include diet and exercise or weight loss (ranked in their top 3 recommendations for either patient by only 48 physicians [35%]), although these were among the 3 preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy based on the mathematical model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, physicians prioritized preventive services under time constraints, but priorities did not vary across patients. Physicians did not prioritize lifestyle interventions despite large potential benefits. Future research should consider whether physicians and patients would benefit from guidance on preventive care priorities.


Assuntos
Prioridades em Saúde/normas , Médicos/normas , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Adulto , Competência Clínica/normas , Comorbidade , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Prioridades em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/normas , Médicos de Atenção Primária/tendências , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medicina Preventiva/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 68(4): 201-214, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631663

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early childhood caries represent a major public health problem. In addition to their individual impact, the massive social inequalities in oral health that are at the roots and result from the disease have largely underestimated consequences for the child, his family and the community. In response to the question of "how and where to act?", this scoping review identifies the individual characteristics associated with the disease on which it would be possible to act, using appropriate prevention strategies. METHODS: This scoping review is aimed at describing and analyzing available data in the literature on the different factors associated with early childhood caries. RESULTS: The predictors of early childhood caries are represented by mediating (knowledge, attitudes and parents' oral health practices) and moderating (psychosocial parameters, parental health literacy and alcohol consumption) factors. Twenty-eight articles fulfilled the selection criteria, twenty of which studied mediators related to early childhood caries, and fourteen of which dealt with moderators. The lower the parents' level of knowledge and literacy in oral health, the higher a child's dmft index. Additional studies are needed to assess the role of psychosocial parameters. CONCLUSION: Parents' knowledge and oral health literacy are the key predictors to be preferentially targeted in view of reducing social inequalities in health through actions undertaken on a local scale. The prevention of early childhood caries necessitates a combination of generic and targeted interventions.


Assuntos
Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Cárie Dentária/etiologia , Cárie Dentária/prevenção & controle , Saúde Bucal , Pais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cárie Dentária/diagnóstico , Família , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Saúde Bucal/normas , Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pais/psicologia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
J Pediatr ; 224: 79-86.e2, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446724

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine mental health diagnoses, healthcare use, and receipt of age-appropriate preventive care, including antibiotic prophylaxis, hydroxyurea therapy, and transcranial Doppler screenings, among children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). STUDY DESIGN: Children aged 1-17 years with SCA from 6 states having 3 or more Medicaid claims with a SCA diagnosis within a year (2005-2012) were included. Children with mental health diagnoses were identified with 1 or more mental health encounters. Poisson and logistic regression models with general estimating equations assessed the relationship between mental health diagnoses, healthcare use, and receipt of age-appropriate preventive care. RESULTS: In total, 7963 children with SCA were identified (22 424 person-years); 1593 person-years (7.1%) included 1 or more mental health diagnoses. Children with a mental health diagnosis were more likely to have inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.36-1.56) and outpatient (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.34), emergency department (IRR 1.39, 95% CI 1.30-1.48), and well-child visits (IRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11-1.29). Those with a mental health diagnosis were more likely to receive hydroxyurea therapy (odds ration [OR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) and less likely to receive transcranial Doppler screenings (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Children with SCA do not receive adequate age-appropriate preventive care. Further research is necessary to identify key points of coordination between mental health and SCA services throughout the life course. This approach may help to increase receipt of age-appropriate preventive care and decrease reliance on acute care.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Antidrepanocíticos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hidroxiureia/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1642020 04 09.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324350

RESUMO

Prescription of medication is one of the most common medical interventions. Just half of patients use a prescribed preventative medication in accordance with the doctor's instructions; this leads to a smaller effect from the medication, side effects and higher care costs. Therapy-non-compliant patients are hardly recognisable on the basis of clinical, demographic or medication-related characteristics. The prescriber can make use of pharmacist data, questionnaires, or technical aids, or broach the subject with the patient to discover whether or not the patient is therapy-compliant. Reasons for non-compliance with therapy can be roughly divided into unintentional or practical reasons and intentional reasons. Tailored intervention can be offered on the basis of the underlying reasons.


Assuntos
Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 68(2): 83-90, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older persons comprise a growing proportion of the European population and may have a distinct epidemiological oral profile requiring specific preventive and curative care poorly documented. The objectives of this study were to assess the oral health status of people ≥90 years of age in France, to compare their perceived and observed oral care needs and to investigate the oral problems associated with a low oral health-related quality-of-life (OHRQoL). METHODS: An oral cross-sectional study was performed during the 25th follow-up of a cohort of older persons being followed up prospectively for screening of dementia over a 15-year period in Gironde and Dordogne, France. Clinical oral indices were determined by oral examinations conducted at the participants' place of living. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to assess the agreement between perceived and observed oral care needs. Oral problems associated with a low OHRQoL, measured with the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI<50) were investigated with logistic regression. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Data from 90 persons were analysed (76% female; median age=93 years; 20% living in an institution). Plaque and calculus were present in 93% and 58% respectively, of the 74 dentate participants. The mean number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth was 26.5 (±5.3); 66% of the participants had at least one untreated decayed tooth. Among the 85 participants with tooth loss not replaced by a fixed denture, two thirds had a removable dental prosthesis; 84% of these prostheses were considered to be maladapted. Among the 39 participants who felt unable to consult a dentist (43%), lack of transportation was the most frequently cited reason. Although 88% of the participants needed oral care, only 26% perceived that they had such a need (Kappa=0.06). Oral problems associated with a GOHAI<50 were the absence of posterior occluding teeth (OR=7.15; 95%CI=1.53-33.35; P=0.012), feeling of dry mouth (OR=11.94; 95%CI=3.21-44.39; P=0.0002) and oral pain (OR=9.06; 95%CI=1.91-69.00; P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Persons ≥90 years of age have considerable preventive and curative dental care needs that impact their quality-of-life but they are rarely aware and lack transportation. NCT04065828.


Assuntos
Assistência Odontológica , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos , Doenças da Boca/terapia , Saúde Bucal , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Assistência Odontológica/normas , Assistência Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças da Boca/epidemiologia , Doenças da Boca/prevenção & controle , Saúde Bucal/normas , Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Perda de Dente/epidemiologia
12.
Int Wound J ; 17(1): 214-219, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31696665

RESUMO

Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) affect patients during hospitalisation, putting patients at risk for further complications. HAPU is one of the hospital quality indicators that require quality initiatives or programmes to minimise its occurrence and consequences. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a developed quality improvement programme in preventing HAPUs. This is a retrospective comparative study, which tracked the outcomes of pressure ulcer prevention programme (PUPP) for 5 years from 2014 to 2018. Data from 50 441 patients were collected from different units in a tertiary hospital in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. The programme focused on building a wound care team; providing education to hospital staff, patients, and their families; and continuous data monitoring, in addition to follow-up visits after discharge. Implementation of the programme was successful showing a statistically significant reduction of HAPUs from 0.20% in 2014 to 0.06% in 2018 (P value <.001). The PUPP was effective in reducing the percentage of pressure ulcer cases. The programme can be extended and implemented in other hospitals.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita
13.
Acad Pediatr ; 20(2): 234-240, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857250

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Incorporating culturally sensitive care into well-child visits may help address pediatric preventive care disparities faced by racial and ethnic minorities, families with limited English proficiency, and immigrants. We explored parents' perspectives about the extent to which their children's pediatric care is culturally sensitive and potential associations between culturally sensitive care and well-child visit quality. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional surveys with parents attending a well-child visit for a child ages 3 to 48 months. To measure culturally sensitive care, we created a composite score by averaging 8 subscales from an adapted version of the Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey. We assessed well-child visit quality through the Promoting Healthy Development Survey. Multivariate linear regression was used to understand associations between demographic characteristics and parent-reported culturally sensitive care. We used multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between culturally sensitive care and well-child visit quality. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve parents (71% of those approached) completed the survey. Parents born abroad, compared with those born in the United States, reported significantly higher culturally sensitive care scores (+0.21; confidence interval [CI]: 0.004, 0.43). Haitian parents reported significantly lower culturally sensitive care scores compared with non-Hispanic white parents (-0.49; CI: -0.89, -0.09). Parent-reported culturally sensitive care was significantly associated with higher odds of well-child visit quality including receipt of anticipatory guidance (adjusted odds ratio: 2.68; CI: 1.62, 4.62) and overall well-child visit quality (adjusted odds ratio: 2.54; CI: 1.59, 4.22). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior research of adult patients, this study demonstrates an association between parent-reported culturally sensitive care and well-child visit quality. Future research should explore best practices to integrating culturally sensitive care in pediatric preventive health care settings.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pais , Pediatria/normas , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Povo Asiático , População Negra , Pré-Escolar , Etnicidade , Feminino , Haiti/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Lactente , Proficiência Limitada em Inglês , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(11): e1914718, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31702797

RESUMO

Importance: No studies to date have examined support by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for primary and secondary prevention research in humans and related methods research that measures the leading risk factors or causes of death or disability as outcomes or exposures. Objective: To characterize NIH support for such research. Design and Setting: This serial cross-sectional study randomly sampled NIH grants and cooperative agreements funded during fiscal years 2012 through 2017. For awards with multiple subprojects, each was treated as a separate project. Study characteristics, outcomes, and exposures were coded from October 2015 through February 2019. Analyses weighted to reflect the sampling scheme were completed in March through June 2019. Using 2017 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 2016 data from the Global Burden of Disease project, the leading risk factors and causes of death and disability in the United States were identified. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the percentage of the NIH prevention research portfolio measuring a leading risk factor or cause of death or disability as an outcome or exposure. Results: A total of 11 082 research projects were coded. Only 25.9% (95% CI, 24.0%-27.8%) of prevention research projects measured a leading cause of death as an outcome or exposure, although these leading causes were associated with 74.0% of US mortality. Only 34.0% (95% CI, 32.2%-35.9%) measured a leading risk factor for death, although these risk factors were associated with 57.3% of mortality. Only 31.4% (95% CI, 29.6%-33.3%) measured a leading risk factor for disability-adjusted life-years lost, although these risk factors were associated with 42.1% of disability-adjusted life-years lost. Relatively few projects included a randomized clinical trial (24.6%; 95% CI, 22.5%-26.9%) or involved more than 1 leading cause (3.3%; 95% CI, 2.6%-4.1%) or risk factor (8.8%; 95% CI, 7.9%-9.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the leading risk factors and causes of death and disability were underrepresented in the NIH prevention research portfolio relative to their burden. Because so much is already known about these risk factors and causes, and because randomized interventions play such a vital role in the development of clinical and public health guidelines, it appears that greater attention should be given to develop and test interventions that address these risk factors and causes, addressing multiple risk factors or causes when possible.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte/tendências , Estudos sobre Deficiências/tendências , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/tendências , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Classificação/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos sobre Deficiências/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 353, 2019 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31164125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Republic of Moldova is faced with a high prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related to lifestyle and health behavioural factors. Within the frame of the decentralisation reform, the primary health care system has been tasked to play an important role in the provision of preventative and curative NCD health services. There is however limited evidence available on the actual coverage and quality of care provided. Our paper aims to provide an updated overview of the coverage and quality of service provision in rural and urban regions of Moldova. METHODS: We designed a facility-based survey to measure aspects of coverage and quality of care of NCD services across 20 districts of the Republic of Moldova. This study presents descriptive data on the structural, procedural and clinical aspects of primary healthcare delivery at health centre and family doctor office level. Adjacent private pharmacies were also assessed for the availability of essential NCD medicine. RESULTS: Organised under the WHO Health Systems Framework, our findings highlight that service provision and information were generally the strongest among the six health systems building blocks, with more weaknesses found in the area of the health workforce, medical products, financing, and leadership/governance. Urban facilities generally fared better across all indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The gaps in service provision identified by this study require broad health system improvements to ensure NCD related policies and strategies are embedded in primary health care service provision. This likely calls for stronger coordination and collaboration between the public and private sectors and the different levels of government working towards ensuring universal health coverage in Moldova.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças não Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Moldávia , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 111, 2019 Feb 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736763

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore, among a sample of patients attending one of four Aboriginal Health Services (ACCHSs), the degree of concordance between self-report and medical records for whether screening for key healthcare items had ever been undertaken, or had been undertaken within the recommended timeframe. METHODS: Across the four ACCHSs, a convenience sample of 109 patients was recruited. Patients completed a self-report computer survey assessing when they last had preventive care items undertaken at the service. ACCHS staff completed a medical record audit for matching items. The degree of concordance (i.e. the percentage of cases in which self-reports matched responses from the medical record) was calculated. RESULTS: Concordance was relatively high for items including assessment of Body Mass Index and blood pressure, but was substantially lower for items including assessment of waist circumference, alcohol intake, physical activity, and diet. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on either patient self-report or medical record data for assessing the level of preventive care service delivery by ACCHSs requires caution. Efforts to improve documentation of some preventive care delivery in medical records are needed. These findings are likely to also apply to patients in other general practice settings.


Assuntos
Auditoria Médica , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Populações Vulneráveis , Adulto , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Queensland , Autorrelato
17.
Int Wound J ; 15(6): 985-992, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070026

RESUMO

This exploratory, descriptive study aimed to identify and describe the pressure injury preventative interventions prescribed by nurses following the assessment of a patient's pressure injury risk and to compare the prescribed interventions relative to the assessed risk level. A total of 200 inpatients in a tertiary Australian hospital were included. Patients' charts were audited within 24 hours of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics, pressure injury risk assessment score and level, and preventative interventions prescribed. Most patients were assessed as not being at risk, with the largest group of at-risk patients assessed as being at high risk. Some not-at-risk patients were prescribed interventions intended for those at risk, while prescription rates of preventative interventions recommended for those at any level of risk were variable (6%-64%). Significant associations were found between assessed pressure injury risk and preventative intervention prescription. Preventative intervention prescription was inadequate, potentially exposing some patients to pressure injury. However, the association between intervention prescription and risk level suggests that nurses are prescribing interventions relative to risk. A more structured approach to intervention prescription according to risk level, such as a care bundle, may help to improve nurses' preventative intervention prescription and ensure that all at-risk patients receive appropriate preventative interventions.


Assuntos
Cuidados de Enfermagem/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Úlcera por Pressão/enfermagem , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco
18.
Diabetes Care ; 41(4): 645-652, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29559450

RESUMO

Diabetic foot ulcers remain a major health care problem. They are common, result in considerable suffering, frequently recur, and are associated with high mortality, as well as considerable health care costs. While national and international guidance exists, the evidence base for much of routine clinical care is thin. It follows that many aspects of the structure and delivery of care are susceptible to the beliefs and opinion of individuals. It is probable that this contributes to the geographic variation in outcome that has been documented in a number of countries. This article considers these issues in depth and emphasizes the urgent need to improve the design and conduct of clinical trials in this field, as well as to undertake systematic comparison of the results of routine care in different health economies. There is strong suggestive evidence to indicate that appropriate changes in the relevant care pathways can result in a prompt improvement in clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos , Atenção à Saúde , Pé Diabético/prevenção & controle , Pé Diabético/terapia , Procedimentos Clínicos/economia , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Procedimentos Clínicos/tendências , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Pé Diabético/economia , Pé Diabético/epidemiologia , Geografia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Medicina Preventiva/economia , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Rural Health ; 34 Suppl 1: s48-s55, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28295584

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Reduced access to care and barriers have been shown in rural populations and in publicly insured populations. Barriers limiting health care access in publicly insured populations living in rural areas are not understood. This study investigates rural-urban differences in system-, provider-, and individual-level barriers and access to preventive care among adults and children enrolled in a public insurance program in Minnesota. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a 2008 statewide, cross-sectional survey of publicly insured adults and children (n = 4,388) investigating barriers associated with low utilization of preventive care. Sampling was stratified with oversampling of racial/ethnic minorities. RESULTS: Rural enrollees were more likely to report no past year preventive care compared to urban enrollees. However, this difference was no longer statistically significant after controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00-1.88). Provider- and system-level barriers associated with low use of preventive care among rural enrollees included discrimination based on public insurance status (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.34-2.38), cost of care concerns (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.03-2.89) and uncertainty about care being covered by insurance (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.01-2.85). These and additional provider-level barriers were also identified among urban enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Discrimination, cost of care, and uncertainty about insurance coverage inhibit access in both the rural and urban samples. These barriers are worthy targets of interventions for publicly insured populations regardless of residence. Future studies should investigate additional factors associated with access disparities based on rural-urban residence.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Cobertura do Seguro/normas , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA