RESUMO
Chitosan is a natural polymer with numerous biomedical applications. The cellular activity of chitosan has been studied in various types of cancer, including melanoma, and indicates that these molecules can open new perspectives on antiproliferative action and anticancer therapy. This study analyzes how different chitosan conformations, such as α-chitosan (CH) or ß-oligochitosan (CO), with various degrees of deacetylation (DDA) and molar mass (MM), both in different concentrations and in CH-CO mixtures, influence the cellular processes of SK-MEL-28 melanocytes, to estimate the reactivity of these cells to the applied treatments. The in vitro evaluation was carried out, aiming at the cellular metabolism (MTT assay), cellular morphology, and chitinase-like glycoprotein YKL-40 expression. The in vitro effect of the CH-CO mixture application on melanocytes is obvious at low concentrations of α-chitosan/ß-oligochitosan (1:2 ratio), with the cell's response supporting the hypothesis that ß-oligo-chitosan amplifies the effect. This oligochitosan mixture, favored by the ß conformation and its small size, penetrates faster into the cells, being more reactive when interacting with some cellular components. Morphological effects expressed by the loss of cell adhesion and the depletion of YKL-40 synthesis are significant responses of melanocytes. ß-oligochitosan (1.5 kDa) induces an extension of cytophysiological effects and limits the cell viability compared to α-chitosan (400-900 kDa). Statistical analysis using multivariate techniques showed differences between the CH samples and CH-CO mixtures.
Assuntos
Quitina , Proteína 1 Semelhante à Quitinase-3 , Quitosana , Melanócitos , Oligossacarídeos , Quitosana/química , Quitosana/farmacologia , Melanócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Melanócitos/metabolismo , Humanos , Quitina/análogos & derivados , Quitina/farmacologia , Quitina/química , Oligossacarídeos/farmacologia , Proteína 1 Semelhante à Quitinase-3/metabolismo , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/patologiaRESUMO
Background: Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare subtype of melanoma characterized by high immunogenicity which makes it particularly suitable for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. Case presentation: We report the case of a 53-year-old man with metastatic DM successfully treated with the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, who developed serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The primary tumor was characterized by absent PD-L1 expression and no-brisk lymphocytes infiltration. NGS showed absence of BRAF mutation, a high tumor mutational burden, and an UV-induced DNA damage signature. Metastatic lesions regressed rapidly after few cycles of ICIs until complete response, however the patient developed serious irAEs including hypothyroidism, adrenal deficiency, and acute interstitial nephritis which led to the definitive suspension of treatment. Currently, the patient has normal renal functionality and no disease relapse after 26 months from starting immunotherapy, and after 9 months from its definitive suspension. Conclusion: Efficacy and toxicity are two sides of the same coin of high sensitivity to ICIs in DM. For this reason, these patients should be closely monitored during ICIs therapy to promptly identify serious side effects and to correctly manage them.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Melanoma , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
PURPOSE: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel. RESULTS: Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P = 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.52; P = 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P = 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10-not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%-91%) persisted at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Citocinas , Ipilimumab , Melanoma , Nivolumabe , Humanos , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/mortalidade , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , DNA de Neoplasias , DNA Tumoral CirculanteRESUMO
PURPOSE: Medications regulating immune homeostasis and gut microbiota could affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent medications on the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer receiving ICI therapy in South Korea. METHODS: We identified patients newly treated with ICI for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and malignant melanoma (MM) between August 2017 and June 2020 from a nationwide database in Korea. The effect of concurrent antibiotics (ATBs), corticosteroids (CSs), proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), and opioids prescribed within 30 days before ICI initiation on the treatment duration and survival was assessed. RESULTS: In all, 8870 patients were included in the ICI cohort (NSCLC, 7,128; UC, 960; MM, 782). The patients were prescribed ATBs (33.8%), CSs (47.8%), PPIs (28.5%), and opioids (53.1%) at the baseline. The median overall survival durations were 11.1, 12.2, and 22.1 months in NSCLC, UC, and MM subgroups, respectively, since starting the ICI mostly as second-line (NSCLC and UC) and first-line (MM) therapy. Early progression was observed in 34.2% of the patients. Opioids and CS were strongly associated with poor survival across all cancer types. A high number of concurrent medications was associated with early progression and short survival. Opioid and CS use was associated with poor prognosis in all patients treated with ICIs. However, ATBs and PPIs had a cancer-specific effect on survival. CONCLUSION: A high number of concurrent medications was associated with poor clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , República da Coreia , Interações MedicamentosasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In a multicenter, open-label randomized phase 3 clinical trial conducted in the Netherlands and Denmark, treatment with ex vivo-expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-NKI/CCIT) from autologous melanoma tumor compared with ipilimumab improved progression-free survival in patients with unresectable stage IIIC-IV melanoma after failure of first-line or second-line treatment. Based on this trial, we conducted a cost-utility analysis. METHODS: A Markov decision model was constructed to estimate expected costs (expressed in 2021) and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) of TIL-NKI/CCIT versus ipilimumab in the Netherlands. The Danish setting was assessed in a scenario analysis. A modified societal perspective was applied over a lifetime horizon. TIL-NKI/CCIT production costs were estimated via activity-based costing. Through sensitivity analyses, uncertainties and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean total undiscounted lifetime benefits were 4.47 life years (LYs) and 3.52 QALYs for TIL-NKI/CCIT and 3.33 LYs and 2.46 QALYs for ipilimumab. Total lifetime undiscounted costs in the Netherlands were 347,168 for TIL-NKI/CCIT (including 67,547 for production costs) compared with 433,634 for ipilimumab. Undiscounted lifetime cost in the Danish scenario were 337,309 and 436,135, respectively. This resulted in a dominant situation for TIL-NKI/CCIT compared with ipilimumab in both countries, meaning incremental QALYs were gained at lower costs. Survival probabilities, and utility in progressive disease affected the ICER most. CONCLUSION: Based on the data of a randomized phase 3 trial, treatment with TIL-NKI/CCIT in patients with unresectable stage IIIC-IV melanoma is cost-effective and cost-saving, both in the current Dutch and Danish setting. These findings led to inclusion of TIL-NKI/CCIT as insured care and treatment guidelines. Publicly funded development of the TIL-NKI/CCIT cell therapy shows realistic promise to further explore development of effective personalized treatment while warranting economic sustainability of healthcare systems.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with diminished immunotherapy response in metastatic melanoma. Although NLR assessment in peripheral blood is established, tissue dynamics remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to evaluate tissue NLR (tNLR)'s predictive potential through immunohistochemistry in immunotherapy-treated melanoma. Fifty melanoma patients who underwent anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy were assessed. Hematological, clinical and tumor features were collected from medical records. Responses were categorized using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for immunotherapy (iRECIST) guidelines. Immunohistochemistry for tumor-infiltrating T cells (cluster differentiation 3) and neutrophils (myeloperoxidase) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. NLR, derived NLR (dNLR) and tNLR were calculated. Overall survival (OS) and survival following immunotherapy (SFI) were calculated from diagnosis or immunotherapy start to loss of follow-up or death. Patients with high tNLR presented improved OS ( Pâ =â 0.038) and SFI with anti-PD-1 therapy ( Pâ =â 0.006). Both NLR and dNLR were associated with OS ( Pâ =â 0.038 and Pâ =â 0.046, respectively) and SFI ( Pâ =â 0.001 and Pâ =â 0.019, respectively). NLR was also associated with immunotherapy response ( Pâ =â 0.007). In conclusion, tNLR emerged as a novel potential biomarker of enhanced survival post anti-PD-1 therapy, in contrast to classical NLR and dNLR markers.
Assuntos
Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfócitos , Melanoma , Neutrófilos , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfócitos/metabolismo , Idoso , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/sangue , Imunoterapia/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2011, immunotherapy and targeted therapy revolutionized melanoma treatment. However, inequities in their use may limit the benefits seen by certain patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients in the National Cancer Database for patients with stage IV melanoma from 2 time periods: 2004-2010 and 2016-2020, distinguishing between those who received systemic therapy and those who did not. We investigated the rates and factors associated with treatment omission. We employed Kaplan-Meier analysis to explore the impact of treatment on overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 19,961 patients met the inclusion criteria: 7621 patients were diagnosed in 2004-2010 and 12,340 patients in 2016-2020, of whom 54.9% and 28.3% did not receive systemic treatment, respectively. The rate of "no treatment" has decreased to a plateau of â¼25% in 2020. Median overall survival was improved with treatment in both time periods (2004-2010: 8.8 vs. 5.6 mo [ P <0.05]; and 2016-2020: 25.9 vs. 4.3 mo [ P <0.05]). Nonmedical factors associated with the omission of treatment in both periods included low socioeconomic status, Medicaid or no health insurance, and treatment at low-volume centers. In the period from 2016 to 2020, patients treated at nonacademic programs were also less likely to receive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapies significantly improve survival for patients with metastatic melanoma, but significant disparities exist with their receipt. Local efforts are needed to ensure all patients benefit from these revolutionary treatments.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Melanoma , Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Adulto , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapies have changed the landscape of late-stage melanoma; however, data evaluating timely access to immunotherapy are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database was conducted. Stage III and IV melanoma cases diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 that received systemic treatment with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy were included. Chemotherapy included BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate factors associated with the likelihood of receiving immunotherapy as primary systemic treatment relative to chemotherapy; additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to incorporate time from diagnosis to primary systemic therapy into the analysis. RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 14,446 cases. The cohort included 12,053 (83.4%) immunotherapy and 2393 (16.6%) chemotherapy cases. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with immunotherapy receipt included population density, circle distance, year of diagnosis, Breslow thickness, and cancer stage. Immunotherapy timing was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Minorities were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy than non-Hispanic Whites (HR 0.83, CI 0.74-0.93, p = 0.001). Patients at circle distances of 10-49 miles (HR 0.94, CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.02) and ≥50 miles (HR 0.83, CI 0.77-0.90, p < 0.001) were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients traveling ≥10 miles and minorities have a decreased likelihood of receiving timely immunotherapy administration for primary systemic treatment. Future research is needed to identify what barriers and approaches can be leveraged to address these inequities.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Melanoma , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Adulto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Immunotherapy drugs like Pembrolizumab have shown significant improvements in treatment outcomes of advanced melanoma. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of Pembrolizumab compared to other immunotherapy and chemotherapy drugs in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in Iran. METHODS: A partitioned-survival model, based on data from a recent randomized phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006) and recent meta-analysis, was used to divide Overall survival (OS) time into Progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival for Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Dacarbazine, Temozolomide, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel combination. Quality Life Years (QALY) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) were considered as the final outcome. RESULTS: The ICER of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Nivolumab & Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab compared to Temozolomide was calculated as $40,365.53, $19,591.13, $24,578, and $47,324.2 per QALY, respectively. Scenario analysis demonstrated if the price of one vial of Nivolumab 100 is $90.51, each vial of Pembrolizumab is $119.20, and each vial of Ipilimumab is $101.54, they will be cost-effective in Iran. CONCLUSION: None of the immunotherapy drugs studied were found to be cost-effective when considering the cost-effectiveness threshold of $3,532. Therefore, a cost reduction of more than 90% in the prices of immunotherapy drugs would be necessary for them to be considered cost-effective in Iran.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Melanoma , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Ipilimumab , Nivolumabe , Análise Custo-Benefício , Temozolomida/uso terapêutico , Irã (Geográfico) , Imunoterapia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate response of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SMM) patients to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), using hybrid PET imaging. Fifteen SMM patients underwent hybrid PET imaging before and three months after initiation of ICI. The disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated. Quantitative PET parameters of the primary tumor and their association with DSS and therapy response were investigated. Nine of the fifteen (60%) patients responded to ICI therapy. Patients with therapy response depicted on hybrid PET imaging had better DSS than those without (p = 0.0058). Quantitative PET parameters of the initial PET harbored no association with DSS or therapy response. However, these findings lack of sufficient statistical power and must be interpreted with caution. The first restaging PET-imaging after ICI initiation can help stratify patients with regard to DSS.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/patologia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of oncolytic virotherapies in the treatment of advanced melanoma still remains controversal. It is necessary to conduct quantitative evaluation on the basis of preclinical trial reports. METHODS: Publicly available databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library.) and register (Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched to collect treatment outcomes of oncolytic virotherapies (including herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV), coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21), adenovirus, poxvirus and reovirus) for advanced/unresectable melanoma. Comparisons of treatment response, adverse events (AEs) and survival analyses for different virotherapies were performed by R software based on the extracted data from eligible studies. RESULTS: Finally, thirty-four eligible studies were analysed and HSV virotherapy had the highest average complete response (CR, 24.8%) and HSV had a slightly higher average overall response rate (ORR) than CVA21 (43.8% vs 42.6%). In the pooled results of comparing talimogene laherparepve (T-VEC) with or without GM-CSF/ICIs (immune checkpoint inhibitors) to GM-CSF/ICIs monotherapy suggested virotherapy was more efficient in subgroups CR (RR = 1.80, 95% CI [1.30; 2.51], P < 0.01), ORR (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.02; 1.34], P < 0.05), and DCR (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.15; 1.40], P < 0.01). In patients treated with T-VEC+ICIs, 2-year overall survival (12.1 ± 6.9 months) and progression-free survival (9.9 ± 6.9) were significantly longer than those treated with T-VEC alone. Furthermore, we found that AEs occurred frequently in virotherapy but decreased in a large cohort of enrolled patients, some of which, such as abdominal distension/pain, injection site pain and pruritus, were found to be positively associated with disease progression in patients treated with T-VEC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Given the relative safety and tolerability of oncolytic viruses, and the lack of reports of dose-limiting-dependent toxicities, more patients treated with T-VEC with or without ICIs should be added to future assessment analyses. There is still a long way to go before it can be used as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced or unresectable melanoma.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Terapia Viral Oncolítica , Vírus Oncolíticos , Humanos , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Viral Oncolítica/métodos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Vírus Oncolíticos/genética , DorRESUMO
Loco-regional chemotherapy is a strategy used to achieve more precise anticancer drug effect directly on tumor mass, while decreasing whole body exposure, which can lead to undesirable side effects. Thus, the loco-regional chemotherapy is conceptually similar to the targeted drug delivery systems for delivering chemotherapeutics to cancer cells in a certain location of the body. Recently, it has been demonstrated that a novel polymeric film containing the complex between cisplatin (cisPt) and hyaluronan (sodium salt of hyaluronic acid; NaHA) enhanced in vivo efficacy and safety of cisplatin (cisPt) by loco-regional delivery in pleural mesothelioma. Biologically, hyaluronic acid (HA) binds with the CD44 receptor, which is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed by other cancer cells. Thus, administering both cisPt and hyaluronan together as a complex loco-regionally to the tumor site could target cancer cells locally and enhance treatment safety. A slight excess of hyaluronan was required to have more than 85% cisPt complexation. In cell monolayers (2D model) the cisPt/NaHA complex in solution demonstrated dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effect by decreasing the viability of pancreatic, melanoma, and lung cell lines (they all express CD44). At the same concentration in solution, the complex was as effective as cisPt alone. However, when applied as film to melanoma spheroids (3D model), the complex was superior because it prevented the tumor spheroid growth and, more importantly, the formation of new cell colonies. Hence, cisPt/NaHA complex could work in preventing metastases loco-regionally and potentially avoiding systemic relapses.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Melanoma , Humanos , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Ácido Hialurônico/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Hialuronatos/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma, but racial disparities in melanoma outcomes continue. These inequities are not fully explained by individual factors. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations of neighborhood factors with the use of ICIs in metastatic melanoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of commercially insured US adults with metastatic melanoma diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2020. We examined the associations between the county-level percentage of population from racial and ethnic minority groups and the time from metastatic melanoma diagnosis to initiating ICIs using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 4,052 patients with metastatic melanoma, of which 49% used ICIs. We found that the adoption of ICIs in a county declined with increasing minority quintile (quintile 1: 52.4%, quintile 2: 50.4%, quintile 3: 50.1%, quintile 4: 45.8%, and quintile 5: 44.7%). The delay in ICI initiation also went up as the percentage of minorities in a county increased (log-rank test P = 0.03). Compared with the lowest quintile, the adjusted hazard ratio of ICI initiation of the second, third, fourth, and highest minority quintile was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.81-1.08), 0.88 (95% CI = 0.76-1.02), 0.81 (95% CI = 0.68-0.97), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.91), respectively. Secondary analysis revealed that the slower initiation was driven by the counties with the highest percentage of Hispanic population (hazard ratio = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.61-0.89) in both Cox models and sensitivity analyses. High-minority counties correlated with metro areas, higher poverty levels, and a greater number of medical oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with metastatic melanoma living in counties with higher proportion of minorities, particularly of Hispanic origin, are more likely to experience delays in ICI treatment. This study provides important population-level data on neighborhood-level disparity in medication use. More research is needed on the underlying provider- and system-level factors that directly contributed to the lower use of cancer medicines in high-minority areas, which can help inform the development of evidence-based medication use strategies that can improve health outcomes and equity.
Assuntos
Medicare Part C , Melanoma , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Etnicidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Grupos Minoritários , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Real-life data on health care costs and loss of productivity after implementing new agents for metastatic melanoma are important to supplement model-based economic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients registered in the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the National Patient Registry in 2007-2011 were compared to 2012-2016 after the implementation of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy. Health care costs, social transfer income (STI), and loss of productivity were calculated with a 2-step one model generalised linear regression (GLM) model. Medicine costs were calculated separately. RESULTS: In 2007-2011, 70 (15%) out of 464 patients were long-term survivors compared to 347 (32%) out of 1089 patients in 2012-2016. Total health care costs per patient year were significantly lower in the first treatment year (41.457 versus 60.547, relative change (RC) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.94, p = 0.015) and without significant difference the second year in 2012-2016 compared to 2007-2011. Medicine costs per patient year increased the first (85.464 versus 26.339, RC 3.39, 95% CI 2.61-4.41, p < 0.001) and the second (26.464 versus 11.150, RC 2.59, 95% CI 1.98-3.40, p < 0.001) year in 2012-2016 compared to 2007-2011. Productivity increased for long-term survivors in 2012-2016 in contrast to 2007-2011. CONCLUSION: Implementation of targeted therapy and checkpoint-inhibitors has increased medicine costs more than three-fold for long-term survivors. Total health care costs excluding medicine costs were significantly lower for long-term survivors the first and without change the second treatment year in 2012-2016 compared to 2007-2011. However, the number of treated patients increased which leads to an increase in overall total health care costs. Importantly, productivity increased for long-term survivors in 2012-2016.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Melanoma , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Humanos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Sobreviventes , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Renda , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Importance: Melanoma treatment has evolved during the past decade with the adoption of adjuvant and palliative immunotherapy and targeted therapies, with an unclear impact on health care costs and outcomes in routine practice. Objective: To examine changes in health care costs, overall survival (OS), and time toxicity associated with primary treatment of melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed a longitudinal, propensity score (PS)-matched, retrospective cohort of residents of Ontario, Canada, aged 20 years or older with stages II to IV cutaneous melanoma identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019. A historical comparison cohort was identified from a population-based sample of invasive melanoma cases diagnosed from the Ontario Cancer Registry from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012. Data analysis was performed from October 17, 2022, to March 13, 2023. Exposures: Era of melanoma diagnosis (2007-2012 vs 2018-2019). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were mean per-capita health care and systemic therapy costs (Canadian dollars) during the first year after melanoma diagnosis, time toxicity (days with physical health care contact) within 1 year of initial treatment, and OS. Standardized differences were used to compare costs and time toxicity. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare OS among PS-matched cohorts. Results: A PS-matched cohort of 731 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [14.8] years; 437 [59.8%] male) with melanoma from 2018 to 2019 and 731 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [14.4] years; 440 [60.2%] male) from 2007 to 2012 were evaluated. The 2018 to 2019 patients had greater mean (SD) health care (including systemic therapy) costs compared with the 2007 to 2012 patients ($47â¯886 [$55â¯176] vs $33â¯347 [$31â¯576]), specifically for stage III ($67â¯108 [$57â¯226] vs $46â¯511 [$30â¯622]) and stage IV disease ($117â¯450 [$79â¯272] vs $47â¯739 [$37â¯652]). Mean (SD) systemic therapy costs were greater among 2018 to 2019 patients: stage II ($40â¯823 [$40â¯621] vs $10â¯309 [$12â¯176]), III ($55â¯699 [$41â¯181] vs $9764 [$12â¯771]), and IV disease ($79â¯358 [$50â¯442] vs $9318 [$14â¯986]). Overall survival was greater for the 2018 to 2019 cohort compared with the 2007 to 2012 cohort (3-year OS: 74.2% [95% CI, 70.8%-77.2%] vs 65.8% [95% CI, 62.2%-69.1%], hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61-0.85]; P < .001). Time toxicity was similar between eras. Patients with stage IV disease spent more than 1 day per week (>52 days) with physical contact with the health care system by 2018 to 2019 (mean [SD], 58.7 [43.8] vs 44.2 [26.5] days; standardized difference, 0.40; P = .20). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found greater health care costs in the treatment of stages II to IV melanoma and substantial time toxicity for patients with stage IV disease, with improvements in OS associated with the adoption of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. These health system-wide data highlight the trade-off with adoption of new therapies, for which there is a greater economic burden to the health care system and time burden to patients but an associated improvement in survival.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Canadá , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Melanoma Maligno CutâneoRESUMO
The normative regimens recommendations for treating metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) are absent in the US. Recently, a phase III randomized clinical trial revealed that tebentafusp yielded a conspicuously longer overall survival than the control group. Based on the prominent efficacy, this study aimed to assess whether tebentafusp is cost-effective compared to the control group in patients with untreated mUM. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the perspective of US payers. Scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the conclusion uncertainty. Compared with control group, tebentafusp therapy yielded an additional 0.47 QALYs (1.19 vs. 0.72 QALYs) and an incremental cost of $444â 280 ($633â 822 vs. $189â 542). The resultant ICER of $953â 230/QALY far outweighed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $200â 000/QALY. The ICER was always more than $750â 000/QALY in all the univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Scenario analyses indicated that reducing the unit price of tebentafusp to $33.768/µg was associated with a favorable result of tebentafusp being cost-effective. For treatment-naive patients with mUM, the cost of tebentafusp therapy was not worth the improvement in survival benefits at the current price compared to the investigator's choice of therapy. The cost-effectiveness of tebentafusp could be promoted using value-based pricing.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Produção de Droga sem Interesse Comercial , Análise Custo-BenefícioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapies has revolutionized metastatic melanoma (MM) management but their use is associated with high daily costs compared to chemotherapies: 2 for dacarbazine versus 175 for immunotherapies and 413 for targeted therapies. While overall survival (OS) has increased, healthcare expenditures are expected to double by 2030. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the median OS and costs for MM patients in order to evaluate the effectiveness of new biological or targeted therapies (NT) used since 2013 compared to chemotherapies. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric cost-effectiveness analysis performed in CHU Nantes (Nantes University Hospital). All MM patients treated with conventional chemotherapy as first-line treatment between 2008 and 2012 were included (CHEMO group). The same number of patients treated with NT as first-line between 2013 and 2017 were included (NT group). RESULTS: In total, 161 patients were included in each group. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.7±2.4 years in the CHEMO group and 65.3±2.4 years in the NT group (not significant). The men/women ratio was 1.48 and 1.27, respectively, (not significant). The median OS was 158 days in the CHEMO group and 395 days in the NT group (p<0.001). Treatment cost was 10,280/patient versus 94,676/patient, respectively. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 90,184/LY (95% CI: 59,637; 166,395). CONCLUSION: Our study assessed clinical and economic features associated with MM management before and after the advent of NT. Costs and life expectancy have increased. NT appears to be cost-effective.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Dacarbazina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The evidence base to support reimbursement decision making for oncology drugs is often based on short-term follow-up trial data, and attempts to address this uncertainty are not typically undertaken once a reimbursement decision is made. To address this gap, we sought to conduct a reassessment of an oncology drug (pembrolizumab) for patients with advanced melanoma which was approved based on interim data with a median 7.9 months of follow-up and for which long-term data have since been published. We developed a three-health-state partitioned survival model based on the phase 3 KEYNOTE-006 clinical trial data using patient-level data reconstruction techniques based on an interim analysis. We used a standard survival analysis and parametric curve fitting techniques to extrapolate beyond the trial follow-up time, and the model structure and inputs were derived from the literature. Five-year long-term follow-up data from the trial were then used to re-evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for treatment of advanced melanoma. The best fitting parametric curves and corresponding survival extrapolations for reconstructed interim data and long-term data reconstructed from KEYNOTE-006 were different. An analysis of the 5 year long-term follow-up data generated a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) that was 28% higher than the ICER based on interim trial data. Our findings suggest that there may be a trade-off between certainty and the ICER. Conducting health technology re-assessments of certain oncology products on the basis of longer-term data availability, especially for those health technology adoption decisions made based on immature clinical data, may be of value to decision makers.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Humanos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Incerteza , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
High mortality, aggressiveness, and the relatively low effectiveness of therapy make melanoma the most dangerous of skin cancers. Previously published studies presented the promising therapeutic potential of minocycline, doxycycline, and chlortetracycline on melanoma cells. This study aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of tigecycline, a third-generation tetracycline, on melanotic (COLO 829) and amelanotic (A375) melanoma cell lines. The obtained results showed that tigecycline, proportionally to the concentration and incubation time, efficiently inhibited proliferation of both types of melanoma cells. The effect was accompanied by the dysregulation of the cell cycle, the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, and a decrease in the reduced thiols and the levels of MITF and p44/42 MAPK. However, the ability to induce apoptosis was only found in COLO 829 melanoma cells. A375 cells appeared to be more resistant to the treatment with tigecycline. The drug did not induce apoptosis but caused an increase in LC3A/B protein levels-an autophagy marker. The observed differences in drug action on the tested cell lines also involved an increase in p21 and p16 protein levels in melanotic melanoma, which was related to cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase. The greater sensitivity of melanotic melanoma cells to the action of tigecycline suggests the possibility of considering the use of the drug in targeted therapy.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Humanos , Tigeciclina/farmacologia , Tigeciclina/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Proliferação de Células , Apoptose , AutofagiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab was approved in the US as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma post-complete resection, based on prolonged recurrence-free survival vs. placebo in the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs. observation as adjuvant treatment of stage IIB or IIC melanoma from a US health sector perspective. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate patient transitions among recurrence-free, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death. Transition probabilities from recurrence-free and locoregional recurrence were estimated via multistate parametric modeling based on patient-level data from an interim analysis (data cutoff date: 04-Jan-2022). Transition probabilities from distant metastasis were based on KEYNOTE-006 data and network meta-analysis. Costs were estimated in 2022 US dollars. Utilities were based on applying US value set to EQ-5D-5L data collected in trial and literature. RESULTS: Compared to observation, pembrolizumab increased total costs by $80,423 and provided gains of 1.17 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 1.24 life years (LYs) over lifetime, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $68,736/QALY and $65,059/LY. The higher upfront costs of adjuvant treatment were largely offset by reductions in costs of subsequent treatment, downstream disease management, and terminal care, reflecting the lower risk of recurrence with pembrolizumab. Results were robust in one-way sensitivity and scenario analyses. At a $150,000/QALY threshold, pembrolizumab was cost-effective vs. observation in 73.9% of probabilistic simulations that considered parameter uncertainty. CONCLUSION: As an adjuvant treatment of stage IIB or IIC melanoma, pembrolizumab was estimated to reduce recurrence, extend patients' life and QALYs, and be cost-effective versus observation at a US willingness-to-pay threshold.