Parenchymal-sparing Hepatectomy as the New Doctrine in the Treatment of Liver-metastatic Colorectal Disease: Beyond Oncological Outcomes.

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality in the Western world. Half of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver-metastatic (CLM) disease, with fewer than 30% having surgically resectable disease at diagnosis. It is well established in the literature that major hepatectomy offers a high rate of R0 resection, however, with concommitant increased rates of mortality and morbidity. Emerging literature during the past two decades has demonstrated the potential superiority of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) in treating CLM disease in terms of oncological outcomes, survival and re-operation in cases of recurrence (salvageability). To date, no data regarding the evaluation of quality of life and cost after PSH have been published. PSH seems to be correlated with less mortality and morbidity, which can be translated in lower re-admission rates, better quality of life and, therefore, reduced relevant cost. Prospective studies and clinical trials evaluating the multiple beneficial role of a PSH surgical strategy in CLM disease are mandatory to support or reject the emerging belief that PSH could be the gold standard of treatment of CLM disease.

Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is used in specialized centers all over the world. However, laparoscopic liver resection has never been compared with open liver resection in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The Oslo-CoMet Study is a randomized trial into laparoscopic versus open liver resection for the surgical management of hepatic colorectal metastases. The primary outcome is 30-day perioperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes include 5-year survival (overall, disease-free and recurrence-free), resection margins, recurrence pattern, postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, and evaluation of the inflammatory response. A cost-utility analysis of replacing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery will also be performed. The study includes all resections for colorectal liver metastases, except formal hemihepatectomies, resections where reconstruction of vessels/bile ducts is necessary and resections that need to be combined with ablation. All patients will participate in an enhanced recovery after surgery program. A biobank of liver and tumor tissue will be established and molecular analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: After 35 months of recruitment, 200 patients have been included in the trial. Molecular and immunology data are being analyzed. Results for primary and secondary outcome measures will be presented following the conclusion of the study (late 2015). The Oslo-CoMet Study will provide the first level 1 evidence on the benefits of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrals.gov (NCT01516710) on 19 January 2012.

Cost-utility analysis of operative versus non-operative treatment for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is the standard of care when possible, although this strategy has not been compared with non-operative interventions in controlled trials. Although survival outcomes are clear, the cost-effectiveness of surgery is not. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of resection for CRLMs compared with non-operative treatment (palliative care including chemotherapy). METHODS: Operative and non-operative cohorts were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients in the operative cohort had a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. A model-based cost-utility analysis was conducted to quantify the mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. The analysis was conducted from a healthcare provider perspective (UK National Health Service) in a secondary care (hospital) setting. RESULTS: Median survival was 41 and 21 months in the operative and non-operative cohorts respectively (P < 0·001). The operative strategy dominated non-operative treatments, being less costly (€22,200 versus €32,800) and more effective (4·017 versus 1·111 QALYs gained). The results of extensive sensitivity analysis showed that the operative strategy dominated non-operative treatment in every scenario. CONCLUSION: Operative treatment of CRLMs yields greater survival than non-operative treatment, and is both more effective and less costly.

Percutaneous cryoablation of metastatic lesions from non-small-cell lung carcinoma: initial survival, local control, and cost observations.

PURPOSE: To assess feasibility, complications, local tumor recurrences, overall survival (OS), and estimates of cost effectiveness for multisite cryoablation (MCA) of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 computed tomography- and/or ultrasound-guided percutaneous MCA procedures were performed on 60 tumors in 31 patients (19 women and 12 men) with oligometastatic NSCLC. Average patient age was 65 years. Tumor location was grouped according to common metastatic sites. Median OS was determined by Kaplan-Meier method and defined life-years gained (LYGs). Estimates of MCA costs per LYG were compared with established values for systemic therapies. RESULTS: Total numbers of tumors and cryoablation procedures for each anatomic site were as follows: lung, 20 and 18; liver, nine and seven; superficial, 12 and 11; adrenal, seven and seven; paraaortic/isolated, two and two; and bone, 10 and seven. A mean of 1.6 procedures per patient were performed, with a median clinical follow-up of 11 months. Major complication and local recurrence rates were 8% (four of 49) and 8% (five of 60), respectively. Median OS for MCA was 1.33 years, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of approximately 53%. MCA appeared cost-effective even when added to the cost of best supportive care or systemic regimens, with an adjunctive cost-effectiveness ratio of $49,008-$87,074. CONCLUSIONS: MCA was associated with very low morbidity and local tumor recurrence rates for all anatomic sites, and possibly increased OS. Even as an adjunct to systemic therapies, MCA appeared cost-effective for palliation of oligometastatic NSCLC.

Percutaneous cryoablation of metastatic renal cell carcinoma for local tumor control: feasibility, outcomes, and estimated cost-effectiveness for palliation.

PURPOSE: To assess complications, local tumor recurrences, overall survival (OS), and estimates of cost-effectiveness for multisite cryoablation (MCA) of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 computed tomography- and/or ultrasound-guided percutaneous MCA procedures were performed on 72 tumors in 27 patients (three women and 24 men). Average patient age was 63 years. Tumor location was grouped according to common metastatic sites. Established surgical selection criteria graded patient status. Median OS was determined by Kaplan-Meier method and defined life-years gained (LYGs). Estimates of MCA costs per LYG were compared with established values for systemic therapies. RESULTS: Total number of tumors and cryoablation procedures for each anatomic site are as follows: nephrectomy bed, 11 and 11; adrenal gland, nine and eight; paraaortic, seven and six; lung, 14 and 13; bone, 13 and 13; superficial, 12 and nine; intraperitoneal, five and three; and liver, one and one. A mean of 2.2 procedures per patient were performed, with a median clinical follow-up of 16 months. Major complication and local recurrence rates were 2% (one of 60) and 3% (two of 72), respectively. No patients were graded as having good surgical risk, but median OS was 2.69 years, with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 27%. Cryoablation remained cost-effective with or without the presence of systemic therapies according to historical cost comparisons, with an adjunctive cost-effectiveness ratio of $28,312-$59,554 per LYG. CONCLUSIONS: MCA was associated with very low morbidity and local tumor recurrence rates for all anatomic sites, with apparent increased OS. Even as an adjunct to systemic therapies, MCA appeared cost-effective for palliation of oligometastatic RCC.