An Economical Online Solid-Phase Extraction LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Methylprednisolone.

An economical, reproducible and automated online solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to quantify methylprednisolone in human plasma. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, precision/accuracy, process efficiency, stability, cartridge reproducibility and carryover studies. Sample pretreatment was performed by protein precipitation and elimination using methanol followed by water dilution. Then, the mixture was passed onto the HySphere C8 EC-SE online solid-phase extraction cartridge followed by the separation of the analytes on an Agilent Eclipse XDB column. Electrospray ionization in positive ion mode and multiple reaction monitoring were used to monitor the ion transitions at m/z 375.4/160.8 for methylprednisolone, and m/z 361.2/147.0 for prednisolone. The calibration curve ranged from 5.25 to 525 ng/mL. Meanwhile both the intra-day and inter-day precision values (relative standard deviation) were within 4.45%. The method which turns out to be less laborious, faster and lower consumable cost per sample has already been successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which the oral administration of 16 mg methylprednisolone was conducted in Chinese volunteers.

Simultaneous determination of cortisol, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, prednisone, prednisolone, mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid glucuronide in human plasma utilizing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Chronic combination immunosuppressive regimens are commonly prescribed to renal transplant recipients. To develop an assay method for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of multiple immunosuppressives, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) approach for the simultaneous analysis of several glucocorticoids, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) was investigated. The resultant method utilized a gradient reverse phase separation over a Symmetry C18 column using an ammonium acetate-methanol mobile phase at pH 3.5. The analytes were detected by coupling the chromatography system via electrospray to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Multiple-reaction monitoring in the negative mode ion (MH-/product) was employed selecting MPA at 319.1/190.9, MPAG at 495.1/191.0, dexamethasone at 391.0/361.0, hydrocortisone at 361.1/331.1, methylprednisolone at 373.1/343.1, prednisone at 357.1/327.2, and prednisolone at 359.1/329.1. The calibration curve concentrations ranged from 3.60 ng/mL to 50 microg/mL with the lowest limit of quantitation for corticosteroids being 3.60-7.20 ng/mL and 0.656-6.75 microg/mL for MPA and MPAG, respectively. The relative standard deviation for quality control intraday variation and interday variation was between 0.76% and 9.57% for all analytes. This assay offers a versatile, unique method for multi-analyte immunosuppressive determinations during combination immunosuppression.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of bioavailability for two prodrugs of methylprednisolone.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to establish whether pharmacokinetic differences between two pro-drugs of methylprednisolone (MP) are likely to be of clinical significance. METHODS: This study was a single-blind, randomized, crossover design comparing the bioequivalence of MP released from the pro-drugs Promedrol (MP suleptanate) and Solu-Medrol (MP succinate) after a single 250 mg (MP equivalent) intramuscular injection to 20 healthy male volunteers. Bioequivalence was assessed by conventional pharmacokinetic analysis, by measuring pharmacodynamic responses plus a novel approach using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The main measure of pharmacodynamic response was whole blood histamine (WBH), a measure of basophil numbers. RESULTS: The MP Cmax was less for MP suleptanate due to a longer absorption halflife of the prodrug from the intramuscular injection site. The bioavailability of MP was equivalent when based on AUC with a MP suleptanate median 108% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 102-114%). For Cmax the MP suleptanate median was 81% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 75-88%). The tmax for MP from MP suleptanate was delayed relative to MP succinate. The median difference was 200% (90% non-parametric CI: 141-283%). The area under the WBH effect-time curve (AUEC) and the maximum response (Emax) were found to be equivalent (90% CI: 98-113% and 93-109% respectively). The maximum changes in other white blood cell counts, blood glucose concentration and the parameters of the pharmacodynamic sigmoid Emax model (EC50, Emax and gamma) were also not significantly different between prodrugs. CONCLUSIONS: MP suleptanate is an acceptable pharmaceutical alternative to MP succinate. The use of both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response data together gives greater confidence in the conclusions compared with those based only on conventional pharmacokinetic bioequivalence analysis.

Analysis of methylprednisolone, methylprednisone and corticosterone for assessment of methylprednisolone disposition in the rat.

A sensitive, specific and precise high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the simultaneous determination of methylprednisolone, methylprednisone and corticosterone using betamethasone as the internal standard is reported. Rat serum (0.5 ml) is extracted with methylene chloride, washed with sodium hydroxide, then water and the extract is injected onto a microparticulate silica gel column with ultraviolet detection at 254 nm. Calculated limits of quantitation are less than 10 ng/ml and the intra-day coefficient of variation is less than 5% for each steroid. This assay has been applied to preliminary studies of methylprednisolone disposition in the rat. The plasma concentration-time profile for each steroid was determined following intravenous administration of methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg). Peak serum methylprednisone concentrations of ca. 250 ng/ml occurred within 5 min of methylprednisolone administration and the average area under the curve ratio (methylprednisolone/methylprednisone) was 9.3. These findings demonstrate that methylprednisone is a metabolite of methylprednisolone in the rat and suggest that the metabolic back-conversion of methylprednisone to methylprednisolone may be less than in other species.