Evaluation of Metronomic Therapy as a Low-Cost, Sustainable, Standard-of-Care Option in Desmoid Fibromatosis: Real-World Data From a Tertiary Care Center in India.

PURPOSE: Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a locally aggressive tumor with low mortality but significant morbidity. There is a lack of standard of care, and existing therapies are associated with significant barriers including access, cost, and toxicities. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the metronomic therapy (MT) in DF in a large, homogenous cohort from India. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study involved histologically confirmed DF cases treated with MT comprising vinblastine (6 mg) and methotrexate (15 mg) both once a week, and tamoxifen (40 mg/m2) in two divided doses once daily between 2002 and 2018. RESULTS: There were 315 patients with a median age of 27 years; the commonest site was extremity (142 of 315; 45.0%). There were 159 (50.1%) male patients. Of the 123 (39.0%) prior treated patients, 119 had surgery. Of 315 patients, 263 (83.5%) received treatment at our institute (MT-151, 77-local treatment, 9-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and 26 were observed). Among the MT cohort (n = 163, 61.2%), at a median follow-up of 36 (0.5-186) months, the 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 81.1% (95% CI, 74.3 to 88.4) and 99.2% (95% CI, 97.6 to 100), respectively. There were 35% partial responses. Ninety-two patients (56.4%) completed 1-year therapy, which was an independent prognosticator (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 0.177 [95% CI, 0.083 to 0.377]). MT was well tolerated. Predominant grade ≥3 toxicities were febrile neutropenia, 12 (7.4%) without any chemotoxicity-related death. The annual cost of MT was $130 US dollars. CONCLUSION: The novel, low-cost MT qualifies as one of the effective, less toxic, sustainable, standard-of-care options for the treatment of DF with global reach and merits wide recognition.

Drug-drug interaction assessment based on a large-scale spontaneous reporting system for hepato- and renal-toxicity, and thrombocytopenia with concomitant low-dose methotrexate and analgesics use.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and is highly effective with low-dose intermittent administration. MTX is occasionally used in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen (APAP)/paracetamol for pain or inflammation control. With MTX treatment, the side effects, such as hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and myelosuppression should be considered. These are also seen with analgesics treatment. METHODS: We used a large spontaneously reported adverse event database (FAERS [JAPIC AERS]) to analyze whether the reporting of adverse events increased upon MTX and analgesic therapy in patients with RA. RESULTS: After identifying RA cases, the crude reporting odds ratios (cRORs) for hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and thrombocytopenia associated with the use of MTX, APAP, or NSAIDs were calculated by disproportionality analysis, which revealed significantly higher cRORs for these events. No analgesics showed consistent positive signals for drug-drug interaction (DDI) with concomitant low-dose MTX analyzed using four algorithms for DDI interaction (the Ω shrinkage measure, additive or multiplicative, and combination risk ratio models). However, in renal failure and thrombocytopenia, loxoprofen (Ω025 = 0.08) and piroxicam (Ω025 = 0.46), and ibuprofen (Ω025 = 0.74) and ketorolac (Ω025 = 3.52), respectively, showed positive signals in the Ω shrinkage measure model, and no consistency was found among adverse events or NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Studies using spontaneous reporting systems have limitations such as reporting bias or lack of patient background; however, the results of our comprehensive analysis support the results of previous clinical or epidemiological studies. This study also demonstrated the usefulness of FAERS for DDI assessment.

Assessment of oral methotrexate intolerance in Japanese adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

AIM: The objective of this study was to assess the gastrointestinal side (GI) effects of oral methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 112 Japanese adult patients (over 18 years old) with RA were examined by Methotrexate Intolerance and Severity assessment in Adults (MISA) questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-five (40.2%) of patients were MTX intolerant (MISA score ≥1). Twelve patients (11.2%) were moderate-to-severe MTX intolerant (MISA cross-product score ≥4). The most common GI side effects of MTX were gastric discomfort (26.8%), followed by loss of appetite or dysgeusia (14.3%), fatigue and lethargy (12.5%), and nausea (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Japanese adult patients with RA showed a high prevalence of MTX intolerance even in low-dose oral MTX. The MISA questionnaire was practical for finding patients with MTX intolerance.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of upadacitinib as a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

AIM: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib (targeted synthetic-disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug [ts-DMARD]) as first-line (1 L) treatment versus current treatment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), who had an inadequate response to prior conventional-synthetic (csDMARDs) and/or biologic-DMARDs (bDMARDs). METHODS: This Excel-based model included patients with moderate (Disease Activity Score [DAS28]: >3.2 to ≤5.1) or severe RA (DAS28 > 5.1). Cost-effectiveness of current treatment (1 L: adalimumab-originator/biosimilar; second-line (2 L): other bDMARDs/tofacitinib) was compared against a new treatment involving two scenarios (1 L: upadacitinib, 2 L: adalimumab-biosimilar [scenario-1]/adalimumab-originator [scenario-2]) for a 10-year time-horizon from societal perspective. Model outcomes included direct and indirect costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), hospitalization days, number of orthopedic surgeries, and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) per QALY. RESULTS: With the current pathway, estimated total societal costs for 100 RA patients over 10-year period were Saudi Riyal (SAR) 50,450,354 (United States dollars [USD] 13,453,428) (moderate RA) and SAR50,013,945 (USD13,337,052) (severe RA). New pathway (scenario-1) showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, upadacitinib led to higher QALY gain (+8.99 and +15.63) at lower societal cost (cost difference: -SAR2,023,522 [-USD539,606] and -SAR3,373,029 [-USD899,474], respectively). Thus, as 1 L, upadacitinib projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY over current pathway. Moreover, in alternate pathway (scenario-2), upadacitinib also projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY for patient with severe RA (QALY gain: +15.63; cost difference: -SAR 164,536 [-USD43,876]). However, moderate RA was associated with additional cost of SAR1,255,696 (USD334,852) for improved QALY (+8.99) over current pathway (ICUR per QALY: SAR139,742 [USD37,264]). Both scenarios resulted in reduced hospitalization days (scenario-1: -14.83 days; scenario-2: -11.41 days) and number of orthopedic surgeries (scenario-1: -8.36; scenario-2: -6.54) for moderate-to-severe RA over the current treatment pathway. CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib as 1 L treatment in moderate-to-severe RA can considerably reduce healthcare resource burden in KSA, majorly due to reduced drug administration/monitoring/hospitalization/surgical and indirect costs.

In-vitro and in-vivo assessment of pH-responsive core-shell nanocarrier system for sequential delivery of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of breast cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading fatal diseases affecting females worldwide. Despite the presence of tremendous chemotherapeutic agents, the resistance emergence directs the recent research towards synergistic drugs' combination along with encapsulation inside biocompatible smart nanocarriers. Methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (Fu) are effective against BC and have sequential synergistic activity. In this study, a core-shell nanocarrier composed of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) as the core and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 nano metal organic frameworks (ZIF-8 NMOF) as the shell was developed and loaded with Fu and MTX, respectively. The developed nanostructure; Fu-MSN@MTX-NMOF was validated by several characterization techniques and conferred high drugs' entrapment efficiency (EE%). In-vitro assessment revealed a pH-responsive drug release pattern in the acidic pH where MTX was released followed by Fu. The cytotoxicity evaluation indicated enhanced anticancer effect of the Fu-MSN@MTX-NMOF relative to the free drugs in addition to time-dependent fortified cytotoxic effect due to the sequential drugs' release. The in-vivo anticancer efficiency was examined using Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) animal model where the anticancer effect of the developed Fu-MSN@MTX-NMOF was compared to the sequentially administrated free drugs. The results revealed enhanced anti-tumor effect while maintaining the normal functions of the vital organs as the heart, kidney and liver.

Assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate: Utility of fibroscan and biochemical markers in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of liver fibrosis (LF) measured by FibroScan and APRI index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (AR) undergoing treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: We included 59 patients with RA on MTX. Medical records, FibroScan measures and serological markers of liver damage were compared on the basis of cumulative methotrexate dose. RESULTS: Mean treatment duration was 82.4±65.1 months and mean cumulative dose was 5214.5±4031.9mg. Five patients met LF criteria by fibroscan, while only one patient had a suggestive APRI score. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of LF measured by both APRI and fibroScan between patients with cumulative doses above and below 4000mg. There was also no relationship between LF and treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of LF in patients with RA on MTX is a multifactorial process that does not seem directly related to its cumulative dose. FibroScan may be a useful technique in clinical practice to screen for this complication.

Assessment of Ante- and Postnatal Development of the Offspring of Male Rats Crossed in Delayed Periods after Treatment with Methotrexate in Low Doses.

We studied ante- and postnatal development of the offspring of intact female rats crossed with males injected with low doses of methotrexate 3 and 6 months before mating. The time of crossing corresponded to the manifestation of the cytostatic effect on spermatogonial stem cells. The offspring of methotrexate-treated males was characterized by increased preimplantation losses and fetal growth restriction in the antenatal period and inhibition of physical development, delayed formation of sensory-motor reflexes, and impaired learning abilities in the postnatal period.

Assessment and Prediction of Adherence to Methotrexate Using Three Self-Report Questionnaires in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Introduction: Methotrexate (MTX) reduces rheumatoid arthritis activity and ameliorates the long-term functional status in these patients. To achieve this aim, patients need to take their medication regularly. Nevertheless, non-adherence to MTX still remains a considerable issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Objective: This study aimed to estimate the adherence to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to identify specific non-adherence risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 111 patients (mean age 56.2 ± 10.6 years, 78.4% female, and mean disease duration 6 years (3-13)). Three adherence self-assessment questionnaires were used: the Compliance-Questionnaire-Rheumatology (CQR19), the Medication Adherence Reports Scale (MARS-5), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). We also collected demographic data, disease and treatment characteristics, and anxiety/depression estimation results (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS). Results: Adherence was identified in 48.6% of patients (COR19), 70.3% of patients (MARS-5), and 82.9% of patients (VAS questionnaire). All three questionnaires displayed a significant positive mutual correlation: CQR19 with MARS-5 and VAS (r = 0.364, r = 0.329, respectively, p < 0.001 for both) and between the VAS and MARS-5 scores (r = 0.496, p < 0.001). A significant positive prediction was shown for urban residence (0.347 (0.134-0.901), p = 0.030) using the MARS-5, female sex (0.264 (0.095-0.730), p = 0.010) according to the CQR19, and for a dose of methotrexate (0.881 (0.783-0.992), p = 0.036) using the VAS, while negative predictions were shown for comorbidity number (3.062 (1.057-8.874), p = 0.039) and depression (1.142 (1.010-1.293), p = 0.035) using the MARS-5 and for older age (1.041 (1.003-1.081), p = 0.034) according to the CQR19. The use of steroids was a significant positive predictor in all three questionnaires and remained an independent predictor for methotrexate adherence in the multivariate logistic regression. Conclusions: We showed non-adherence to methotrexate in a significant number of patients using all three questionnaires. Concomitant steroid therapy emerged as an independent positive predictor for adherence.

To treat or not to treat? Current attitudes on treatment aimed at modifying the disease burden in clinically suspect arthralgia: a survey among participants of the TREAT EARLIER trial and healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES: While awaiting therapies accomplishing rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-prevention in individuals at-risk, recent evidence supports that a 1-year methotrexate treatment may lead to sustained reduction in disease burden and subclinical joint inflammation in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA). We aimed to study the previously unexplored attitudes of CSA patients and rheumatologists on 1-year DMARD treatment in the arthralgia phase to reduce the disease burden, while not preventing RA. METHODS: CSA patients who participated in the TREAT EARLIER trial, thus being expert by experience, were informed on the trial results. Thereafter they completed an anonymous questionnaire about their attitudes on treatment in the CSA phase. We used the same approach for Dutch healthcare professionals in rheumatology. RESULTS: The majority of trial participants (85%) considered the effects of the 1-year treatment as found in the TREAT EARLIER trial, beneficial in the symptomatic at-risk stage. 79% would recommend a 1-year methotrexate course to others with comparable joint complaints. Two-thirds indicated RA prevention and improving disease burden to be equally important treatment goals in the CSA phase. Most healthcare professionals (88%) were inclined to prescribe 1-year treatment to CSA patients aimed at long-term improvement of symptoms and functioning, while not preventing RA development. 59% believed the profits of a 1-year methotrexate course to outweigh disadvantages, for example, side effects. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable willingness exists among CSA patients and rheumatologists to start a 1-year treatment resulting in long-term improvement of symptoms and functioning, while not preventing RA. This emphasises the need for more research optimising treatment regimens and disease monitoring in individuals at-risk to facilitate such treatment decisions in the future, while avoiding an intervention, either limited or for a prolonged period, which may have harms that outweigh benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Netherlands Trials Registry (NTR4853-trial-NL4599). EudraCT number: NL2014-004472-35.

Multifunctional nanoparticles encapsulating methotrexate and curcumin for holistic management of rheumatoid arthritis: in-vitro and pre-clinical assessment.

PURPOSE: Bovine serum albumin (BSA) nanoparticles (BSA-MTX-CUR-NPs) encapsulating methotrexate (MTX) and curcumin (CUR) was developed with an aim to co-deliver the drugs at the inflamed joint so as to maximize the therapeutic efficacy and alleviate toxic side effects associated with MTX. METHODS: Nanoparticle albumin-bound technology was used to formulate nanoparticles, followed by characterization for its particle size, polydispersity index, encapsulation efficiency, zeta potential, surface morphology, in-vitro drug release and drug release kinetics. Further, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the developed nanoparticles in the adjuvant-induced arthritis model. RESULTS: BSA-MTX-CUR-NPs exhibited particle size of 163.05 ± 1.708 nm, polydispersity index of 0.195 ± 0.0024 and % encapsulation efficiency of 68.23 ± 0.640% for MTX and 75.71 ± 0.216% for CUR with controlled release pattern for both the drugs. The scanning electron microscopy revealed nanoparticles exhibited a spherical shape. DSC study confirmed the absence of incompatibility between the drugs and the excipients. Half-life and area under the curve were significantly higher for MTX in the nanoparticulate form in comparison to free MTX. Pharmacodynamic studies revealed that BSA-MTX-CUR-NPs possessed better disease-modifying effects in comparison to free MTX. CONCLUSION: Hence, it can be concluded that albumin nanoparticles constitute a viable method for delivering MTX and CUR to inflamed joints simultaneously, because of the strong affinity of albumin and enhanced permeability and retention effect at the inflamed joint. This combinational therapy of MTX & CUR in nanoparticulate form has the potential for the holistic management of rheumatoid arthritis.

[Risk assessment and prophylactic treatment strategies for central nervous system relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

Rituximab treatment significantly improved the outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A central nervous system (CNS) relapse remains a serious and fatal event for patients with DLBCL; therefore, the clinical question of the optimal treatment regimen for reducing the risk of CNS relapse remains unknown. The CNS-International Prognostic Index was identified as a predictive model for CNS relapse. No factors can completely predict CNS relapse although several reports regarding high-risk factors for CNS relapse have been reported. In practice, intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) and high-dose MTX therapy have been used for CNS prophylaxis. Unfortunately, evidence of the optimal therapy for CNS prophylaxis in patients with DLBCL remains lacking. This study aimed to review CNS relapse assessment and discuss study results with clinical impacts on CNS prophylaxis treatment strategies in DLBCL.

An MMP-2 Responsive Nanotheranostic Probe Enabled Synergistic Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis and MR/CT Assessment of Therapeutic Response In Situ.

This study reports a facile and green synthesis of a new multifunctional nanotheranostic probe for the synergistic therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in situ assessment of therapeutic response. The probe is synthesized through a one-step self-assembly of two exquisitely designed peptide-amphiphilic block copolymers (PEG-DTIPA-KGPLGVRK-MTX and Pal-GGGGHHHHD-TCZ) under mild conditions, requiring minimal energy input. The resultant probe demonstrates excellent biocompatibility, water solubility, and colloidal stability. It exhibits a strong IL-6R targeting ability toward inflamed joints, and releases drugs in an MMP-2-responsive manner. The co-loading of methotrexate(MTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ) into the probe enables synergistic RA therapy with improved efficacy by simultaneously decreasing the activity of adenosine synthetase and interfering with the binding of IL-6 to its receptor. In addition, the resultant probe exhibits a high r1 relaxation rate (7.00 mm-1  s-1 ) and X-ray absorption capability (69.04 Hu mm-1 ), enabling sensitive MR and CT dual-modal imaging for simultaneous evaluation of synovial thickness and bone erosion. Both in vitro experiments using lipopolysaccharide-treated RAW264.7 cells and in vivo experiments using collagen-induced arthritis mice demonstrate the probe's high effectiveness in synergistically inhibiting inflammation. This study provides new insights into RA theranostics, therapeutic monitoring, the design of multifunctional theranostic probes, and beyond.

Cost per responder of adalimumab biosimilars versus methotrexate in patients with psoriasis: a real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacoeconomic studies examining the cost-effectiveness of adalimumab biosimilars versus methotrexate in real-life settings are limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost per responder from the perspective of the National Health System of adalimumab biosimilars versus methotrexate for psoriasis treatment in a real-life setting. METHODS: A cost-per responder analysis comparing adalimumab biosimilars MSB11022 (Idacio®) and ABP 501 (Amgevita) versus subcutaneous methotrexate was performed. The incremental cost per responder was calculated by multiplying the cost of treatment (including the discounts, as published in the framework agreement of the Veneto region) and the number needed to treat each therapy. The clinical efficacy measures were defined as being on treatment (i.e., retention rate) at weeks 24 and 52. RESULTS: A total of 712 adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis consecutively admitted to the outpatient clinic from January 2021 to December 2022 were included; 160 were treated with ABP 501 (Amgevita), 250 with MSB11022 (Idacio) and 302 with methotrexate. The retention rates of Amgevita, Idacio and methotrexate at week 24 were 86%, 90% and 78%, and 81%, 82% and 63% at week 52, respectively. The cost per responder at week 24 was €674 for Amgevita, €366 for Idacio and €264 for methotrexate, respectively; at week 52, was €1430 for Amgevita® €799 for Idacio® and €652 for methotrexate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The real-life cost-effectiveness of biosimilar drugs is largely influenced by discount rates. The week 52 cost-effectiveness of Idacio is comparable to subcutaneous methotrexate. The lowering of the cost of biosimilar drugs makes them a more accessible therapeutic option and they also can be introduced earlier in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Cost-utility analysis of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) and biosimilar DMARDs (bsDMARDs) combined with methotrexate for Thai rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity.

BACKGROUND: New biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) and biosimilar DMARDs (bsDMARDs) all showed greater clinical benefits in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with high disease activity, but imposed higher costs than standard treatment. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 11 alternative treatment strategies for RA patients with high disease activity whose treatment with three conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) failed. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed using a societal perspective to estimate relevant costs and health outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a lifetime horizon (100 years), given a 3% annual discount. Alternative treatment strategies including five bDMARDs, two tsDMARDs, and four bsDMARDs in combination with methotrexate (MTX) were compared with the standard of care (SoC), i.e., cyclosporine and azathioprine. Direct and non-medical care costs were estimated by identifying the resources used, then multiplied by the standard costing menu in the year 2022. Utility and transitional probabilities were collected in three advanced tertiary hospitals. A network meta-analysis was used to estimate the efficacy of each treatment. Lifetime cost, QALYs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated and compared to the cost-effectiveness threshold of 160,000 THB per QALY gained (US $4,634, where 1 USD = 34.53 THB in 2022). Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate parameter uncertainties. RESULTS: The bDMARDs, tsDMARDs or bsDMARDs combined with MTX provided 0.09 to 0.33 QALYs gained with additional costs of 550,986 to 2,096,744 THB (US $15,957 to $60,722) compared to the SoC. The ICER ranged from 2.3 to 8.1 million THB per QALY (US $65,935 to $234,996) compared to the SoC. None of these combinations was cost-effective in the Thai context. The results were sensitive to the mortality hazard ratio of patients with high disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of MTX with either bDMARDs, tsDMARDs or bsDMARDs were not economically attractive compared to the standard practice. However, they reduced disease activity and improved patient quality of life. The price negotiation process for these treatments must be conducted to ensure their financial value and affordability before they are included in the pharmaceutical reimbursement list.

Multidrug chemotherapy, whole-brain radiation and cytarabine therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in elderly patients with dose modification based on geriatric assessment: study protocol for a phase II, multicentre, non-randomised study.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab, high-dose methotrexate, procarbazine and vincristine (R-MPV) is a standard therapy for younger patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL); however, prospective data regarding its use in elderly patients are lacking. This multi-institutional, non-randomised, phase II trial will assess the efficacy and safety of R-MPV and high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) for geriatric patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Forty-five elderly patients will be included. If R-MPV does not achieve complete response, the patients will undergo reduced-dose, whole-brain radiotherapy comprising 23.4 Gy/13 fractions, followed by local boost radiotherapy comprising 21.6 Gy/12 fractions. After achieving complete response using R-MPV with or without radiotherapy, the patients will undergo two courses of HD-AraC. All patients will undergo baseline geriatric 8 (G8) assessment before HD-AraC and after three, five and seven R-MPV courses. Patients with screening scores of ≥14 points that decrease to <14 points during subsequent treatment, or those with screening scores <14 points that decrease from the baseline during subsequent treatment are considered unfit for R-MPV/HD-AraC. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, treatment failure-free survival and frequency of adverse events. The results will guide a later phase III trial and provide information about the utility of a geriatric assessment for defining chemotherapy ineligibility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study complies with the latest Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained. All participants can quit the study without penalty or impact on treatment. The protocol for the study, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form have been approved by the Certified Review Board at Hiroshima University (CRB6180006) (approval number: CRB2018-0011). The study is ongoing within nine tertiary and two secondary hospitals in Japan. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs061180093.

Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments-clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021.

Implementation status of safety measures to prevent errors with non-oncologic methotrexate: surveys in community and hospital pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: Accidental overdose of low-dose methotrexate can lead to serious patient harm. Different safety measures are recommended to prevent errors, yet, as errors continue to happen, their implementation is questionable. AIM: To evaluate the implementation status of safety measures for methotrexate in community and hospital pharmacies. METHOD: An electronic questionnaire was sent to head pharmacists of 163 community and 94 hospital pharmacies in Switzerland. The implementation of recommended safety measures (general measures, safety working procedures, IT-based measures) was assessed and descriptive analysis performed. An analysis of sales data underlined the relevance of our results, i.e., the population under risk for overdose. RESULTS: A response was obtained from 53% (n = 87) of community and 50% (n = 47) of hospital pharmacists. Pharmacies had implemented a median of 6 (IQR 3, community) and 5 (IQR 5, hospital) safety measures overall. Most of these were defined safety procedures, instructing staff on how to handle methotrexate prescriptions. Across all safety measures, compliance with single procedures was perceived as "very likely" by 54% of community pharmacies. IT-based measures (e.g., alerts) were absent in 38% (n = 31) of community and 57% (n = 27) of hospital pharmacies. On average, every community pharmacy dispensed 22 packages annually. CONCLUSION: Safety in relation to methotrexate in pharmacies relies mostly on staff instructions, which are considered weak measures. In light of the serious risk imposed on patients, pharmacies should set a focus on stronger IT-based measures that rely less on human performance.

Cost-Effectiveness of Brentuximab Vedotin Versus Physician's Choice of Methotrexate or Bexarotene for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma in Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin versus physician's choice of methotrexate (MTX) or bexarotene (BEX) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS, 16.7 vs. 3.5 months) and delayed time to subsequent treatment (8.4 vs. 3.7 months), with similar overall survival in patients with CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides (MF) or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL), two types of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin versus MTX or BEX from a Canadian healthcare payer perspective in the indicated population. METHODS: A 5-state partitioned survival model [pre-progression, non-stem cell transplant (SCT) post-progression, SCT, SCT relapse, death] with a weekly cycle length and 45-year lifetime horizon has been developed. Health-state occupancies, utility estimates, and treatment duration were informed by ALCANZA. Other inputs and costs came from the literature or clinician experts. Scenario analyses varied key parameters and tested assumptions. RESULTS: Brentuximab vedotin versus MTX or BEX was cost-effective; the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CAN$43,790 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Brentuximab vedotin was more effective (incremental life years: 0.15; QALYs: 0.25) and total treatment costs were slightly higher (incremental costs: $11,105) than MTX or BEX. Key model drivers included end-stage care duration, SCT eligibility, and brentuximab vedotin retreatment rates. CONCLUSION: Brentuximab vedotin compared with MTX or BEX was cost-effective for CD30-expressing MF and pcALCL. Brentuximab vedotin's higher drug costs versus MTX or BEX were offset by decreased post-progression and end-stage management costs, and showed a 0.25 QALY gain versus MTX or BEX, and increased the proportion of patients eligible for potentially curative SCT.