Comparison of the safety and cost-effectiveness of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B deoxycholate for antifungal prophylaxis after lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Fungal infection after lung transplantation can lead to poor clinical outcome, for which lung transplant recipients require prophylaxis. One of the antifungal agents used after lung transplantation is nebulized amphotericin B (AMB). Nebulized AMB causes adverse events such as dyspnea and airway irritation, and long-term use leads to high economic costs. So far, prophylactic regimens employing AMB deoxycholate (AMB-d) and liposomal AMB (L-AMB) have been developed. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and cost of AMB-d and L-AMB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent lung transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital from January 2021 to May 2023 were included in this study. Thirty-three patients received nebulized AMB-d, whereas 29 received nebulized L-AMB. RESULTS: Both regimens maintained comparable prophylactic efficacy regarding the development of fungal infection in the AMB-d and L-AMB groups (3.0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.877). Patients treated with nebulized L-AMB experienced fewer respiratory-related adverse reactions than those treated with nebulized AMB-d (6.9% vs. 30.3%, P < 0.05), leading to a longer treatment duration with L-AMB than with AMB-d. Additionally, the daily cost of administering L-AMB was lower than that of administering AMB-d (3609 Japanese yen vs. 1792.3 Japanese yen, P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that nebulized L-AMB is safer and more cost-effective than nebulized AMB-d, with comparable efficacy.

The cost-utility analysis of antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in acute myeloid leukaemia patients receiving chemotherapy: a study from a middle-income country.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) contribute to morbidity and mortality during acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treatment. Without prophylaxis, IFI rate during AML treatment in Thailand is high and results in a high mortality rate and a prolonged hospital stay. AIM: To evaluate the cost-utility of antifungal therapy (AFT) prophylaxis during AML treatment. METHODS: We assessed the cost-utility of AFT available in Thailand, including posaconazole (solution), itraconazole (solution and capsule), and voriconazole. A hybrid model consisting of a decision tree and the Markov model was established. RESULTS: The costs to prevent overall IFI using any AFT were all lower than the treatment cost of a non-prophylaxis group, resulting in a saving of 808-1507 USD per patient. Prevention with voriconazole prophylaxis showed the highest quality-adjusted life years (QALYs = 3.51, incremental QALYs = 0.23), followed by posaconazole (QALYs = 3.46, incremental QALY = 0.18) and itraconazole solution (QALYs = 3.45, incremental QALYs = 0.17). Itraconazole capsule reduced QALY in the model. For invasive aspergillosis prevention, posaconazole and voriconazole both resulted in better QALYs and life year savings compared with no prophylaxis. However, posaconazole prophylaxis was the only cost-saving option (976 USD per patient). CONCLUSION: Posaconazole, itraconazole solution and voriconazole were all cost saving compared with no prophylaxis for overall IFI prophylaxis, with voriconazole being the most cost-effective option. Posaconazole and voriconazole were both cost effective for invasive aspergillosis prevention but only posaconazole was cost saving. A change in reimbursement policy for the use of AFT prophylaxis during intensive AML treatment could provide both clinical benefits to patients and substantial economic benefits to healthcare systems.

Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China.

Background: Posaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in hematological-malignancy patients at high risk for IFIs from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Methods: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were built using published data to estimate the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension and first-generation triazoles. Regimens with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lower than the threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) were considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. The regional imbalance of economic development and the tablet formulation of posaconazole were considered in the scenario analyses. Results: In the base-case analysis, posaconazole oral suspension provided an additional 0.109 QALYs at an incremental cost of $954.7, yielding an ICER of $8,784.4/QALY, below the national WTP threshold of $31,315/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust. Scenario analyses showed that the base-case ICER was consistently below the WTP thresholds of all 31 Chinese provinces, with the likelihood of posaconazole being cost-effectiveness ranging from 78.1 to 99.0%. When the posaconazole oral suspension was replaced by the tablet formulation, the ICER increased to $29,214.1/QALY, still below the national WTP threshold and WTP thresholds of 12 provinces. Conclusions: Posaconazole oral suspension is a highly cost-effective regimen for preventing IFI in high-risk hematological-malignancy patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Posaconazole tablets may also be considered in some high-income regions of China.

Prospective CYP2C19-Guided Voriconazole Prophylaxis in Patients With Neutropenic Acute Myeloid Leukemia Reduces the Incidence of Subtherapeutic Antifungal Plasma Concentrations.

A risk mitigation strategy was implemented to determine if a higher prophylactic voriconazole dosage in patients with CYP2C19 rapid metabolizer neutropenic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) reduces the incidence of subtherapeutic trough concentrations. Patients with AML (n = 263) were preemptively genotyped for CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 alleles as part of a single-center prospective, interventional, quality improvement study. CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers (CYP2C19*1/*17) were recommended to receive interventional voriconazole 300 mg twice daily, ultrarapid metabolizers (CYP2C19*17/*17) were recommended to avoid voriconazole, and all others received the standard prophylactic dosage of 200 mg twice daily. In this real-world setting, 202 patients (76.8%) were prescribed prophylactic voriconazole, and of these patients 176 (87.1%) received CYP2C19-guided prophylactic dosing. Voriconazole trough concentrations were obtained for 41 of the 58 (70.7%) CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers prescribed prophylactic voriconazole. Interventional voriconazole resulted in higher plasma trough concentrations (median 2.7 µg/mL) compared with the standard prophylactic dosage (median 0.6 µg/mL; P = 0.001). Subtherapeutic concentrations were avoided in 83.8% of CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers receiving interventional dosage compared to 46.2% receiving standard dosage (P = 0.02). CYP2C19 genotyping to preemptively guide prophylactic voriconazole dosing is feasible and may be a potential strategy for reducing the risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations that potentiate breakthrough fungal infections.

Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole in private and public Brazilian hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is used for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Previous studies have shown it to be cost-effective compared to fluconazole/itraconazole. However, posaconazole has never been economically evaluated in developing countries. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of posaconazole compared to fluconazole in public (SUS) and private hospitals (PHS) in Brazil. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness simulation was conducted on the basis of a pivotal study on the use of posaconazole in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, adjusting the costs to Brazilian data. RESULTS: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed on a hypothetical sample of 100 patients in each drug group. The total cost of posaconazole use alone was USD$ 220,656.31, whereas that for fluconazole was USD$ 83,875.00. Our results showed that patients with IFD remain hospitalized for an additional 12 days, at an average cost of USD$ 850.85 per patient per day. The total money spent by PHS for 100 patients for 100 days was USD$ 342,318.00 for the posaconazole group and USD$ 302,039.00 for the fluconazole group. An analysis of sensitivity (10%) revealed no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil posaconazole is cost-effective, and should be considered for the prophylaxis of patients with AMD/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS) undergoing chemotherapy.

Micafungin antifungal prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT: can we give higher doses, less frequently? A pharmacokinetic study.

Background: Micafungin has a distinct advantage for antifungal prophylaxis in HSCT owing to its better safety profile, specifically in terms of hepatic and renal toxicity. In children, prophylactic micafungin is given as either 1 mg/kg every day or 3 mg/kg every other day. Objectives: We performed a prospective single-centre observational study that investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single 5 mg/kg dose of micafungin in young children undergoing HSCT, to ascertain the eventual feasibility of twice-weekly prophylactic administration. Methods: Nine children, ≤10 years of age undergoing HSCT, were enrolled and received a single intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg micafungin. Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis. Micafungin plasma concentration of >0.2 mg/L was chosen for target attainment (i.e. considered adequate prophylactic concentration). In addition, a population PK model was developed based on current and our previous PK study data. We also evaluated PK model-based simulation of PK profiles and target attainment using Monte Carlo simulation, for several dosing scenarios. Results: Mean clearance was 15.3 mL/h/kg (range 11.0-21.4 mL/h/kg) and the mean elimination half-life was 11.6 h (range 7.8-16.6 h). The mean concentration at 96 h was 0.11 mg/L (range 0.03-0.26 mg/L). Eleven percent (n = 1) of patients achieved target attainment at the end of 96 h. Simulation data showed that 1 mg/kg daily dosing and 3 mg/kg alternate-day dosing strategies achieved at least 99% and 81% target attainment, respectively, whereas a 5 mg/kg with 3 day-interval dosing strategy resulted in 64%, 72% and 84% target attainments in patients with body weights of 10, 20 and 30 kg, respectively. Conclusions: Micafungin at 5 mg/kg dosing did not achieve target attainment at the end of 96 h for antifungal prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT. Simulation data suggest that a dosing strategy of micafungin at 5 mg/kg every 72 h is more likely to achieve target attainment in children with a higher body weight in comparison with children with a lower body weight. A cautious approach is advisable when using a high, but less frequent, dosing strategy in very young children.

Fluconazole versus mould-active triazoles for primary antifungal prophylaxis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis.

This study evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic use of fluconazole versus mould-active triazoles (voriconazole and posaconazole) in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A decision analytical model was developed with inputs from a 7-year retrospective study (2009-2016) of 103 consecutive adult patients with ALL who received antifungal prophylaxis. Information on the administration of antifungal agents, clinical outcomes, and costs were collected. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. The mould-active triazoles group was associated with higher life-years (3.71 vs 3.59) and lower total costs (US$4886 vs US$5722) per patient compared with fluconazole. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that varying all of the key variables in the model did not affect the robustness of the results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that mould-active triazoles had a probability of 77.1 and 90.1% of providing a dominant and cost-effective option relative to fluconazole, respectively. Mould-active triazoles should be regarded as preferable to fluconazole as the first-line prophylactic for adult patients with ALL accompanied by uncommon severe vinca alkaloid-induced neurotoxicity. However, the results reported here should be interpreted with caution owing to the observational nature of the data.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Teicoplanin during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs are known to be significantly altered in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, clinical studies of the PK of drugs administered during ECMO are scarce, and the proper dosing adjustment has yet to be established. We developed a population PK model for teicoplanin, investigated covariates influencing teicoplanin exposure, and suggested an optimal dosing regimen for ECMO patients. Samples for PK analysis were collected from 10 adult patients, and a population PK analysis and simulations were performed to identify an optimal teicoplanin dose needed to provide a >50% probability of target attainment at 72 h using a trough concentration target of >10 µg/ml for mild to moderate infections and a trough concentration target of >15 µg/ml for severe infections. Teicoplanin was well described by a two-compartment PK model with first-order elimination. The presence of ECMO was associated with a lower central volume of distribution, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was associated with a higher peripheral volume of distribution. For mild to moderate infections, an optimal dose was a loading dose (LD) of 600 mg and a maintenance dose (MD) of 400 mg for ECMO patients not receiving CRRT and an LD of 800 mg and an MD of 600 mg for those receiving CRRT. For severe infections, an optimal dose was an LD of 1,000 mg and an MD of 800 mg for ECMO patients not receiving CRRT and an LD of 1,200 mg and an MD of 1,000 mg for those receiving CRRT. In conclusion, doses higher than the standard doses are needed to achieve fast and appropriate teicoplanin exposure during ECMO. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02581280.).

SEIFEM 2010-E: economic evaluation of posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving induction chemotherapy.

Posaconazole demonstrated clinical superiority over fluconazole and itraconazole for prophylaxis of mold infections, although concerns exist regarding the high acquisition cost for posaconazole. In this respect, we sought to analyze the costs of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received prophylactic posaconazole (n = 510, 58%), itraconazole (n = 120, 14%) or fluconazole (n = 175, 20%) during induction chemotherapy. The estimated cost of antifungal prophylaxis as well as the costs of subsequent systemic antifungal therapy for treatening an invasive fungal infections (IFI) was higher in the posaconazole group compared to itraconazole and fluconazole groups. Based on the Monte Carlo simulations, the itraconazole group had the highest cost, followed by the posaconazole and fluconazole group, although the overall survival was higher in the posaconazole group as compared to the other groups. In conclusion, the cost of prophylaxis with posaconazole in AML patients compares favorably with conventional antifungal agents.

Chronic Granulomatous Disease in Patients Reaching Adulthood: A Nationwide Study in France.

Background: Although prognosis of Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) has greatly improved, few studies have focused on its long-term outcome. We studied the clinical course and sequelae of CGD patients diagnosed before age 16, at various adult time points. Method: Cross-sectional French nationwide retrospective study of patients screened through the National Reference Center for Primary Immunodeficiencies (CEREDIH) registry. Results: Eighty CGD patients (71 males [88.7%], 59 X-linked [73.7%], median age 23.9 years [minimum, 16.6; maximum, 59.9]) were included, Median ages at diagnosis and last follow-up were 2.52 and 23.9 years, respectively. Seven patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 553 infections requiring hospitalization occurred in 2017 patient-years. The most common site of infection was pulmonary (31%). Aspergillus spp. (17%) and Staphylococcus aureus (10.7%) were the commonest pathogens. A total of 224 inflammatory episodes occurred in 71 patients, mainly digestive (50%). Their characteristics as well as their annual frequency did not vary before and after age 16. Main sequelae were a small adult height and weight and mild chronic restrictive respiratory failure. At age 16, only 53% of patients were in high school. After age 30 years, 9/13 patients were working. Ten patients died during adulthood. Conclusions: Adult CGD patients displayed similar characteristics and rates of severe infections and inflammatory episodes that those of childhood. The high rate of handicap has become a matter of medical and social consideration. Careful follow-up in centers of expertise is strongly recommended and an extended indication of curative treatment by HSCT should be considered.

Assessment of high-priced systemic antifungal prescriptions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with international guidelines for costly antifungal prescriptions and to compare these results with a first study performed in 2007. METHODS: Retrospective study including all costly antifungal prescriptions made in surgical and medical intensive care units and in a hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and digestive surgery unit. Prescriptions were assessed in terms of indication, dosage, and antifungal de-escalation. RESULTS: Seventy-four treatments were analyzed. Treatments were prescribed for prophylactic (1%), empirical (22%), pre-emptive (16%), or targeted therapy (61%). Caspofungin accounted for 68% of prescriptions, followed by voriconazole (20%) and liposomal amphotericin B (12%). Indication was appropriate in 91%, debatable in 1%, and inappropriate in 8%. Dosage was appropriate in 69%, debatable in 8%, and inappropriate in 23%. Prescriptions were inappropriate for the following reasons: lack of dosage adjustment in light of the hepatic function (10 cases), underdosage or excessive dosage by>25% of the recommended dose in seven cases. De-escalation to fluconazole was implemented in 40% of patients presenting with a fluconazole-susceptible candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of appropriate use was higher in 2012 compared with 2007 (62% and 37% respectively, P=0.004). Nevertheless, costly antifungal prescriptions need to be optimized in particular for empirical therapy, dosage adjustment, and potential de-escalation to fluconazole.

Health Threats from Contamination of Spices Commercialized in Romania: Risks of Fungal and Bacterial Infections.

BACKGROUND: The study of fungal contamination in food and mycotoxicoses is a priority today, both internationally and nationally. The purpose of this study is to have a general view over the quality of the most common spices that are sold in Romanian markets, by assessing the degree of fungal, bacterial and mycotoxin contamination in pepper and chili powders. METHODS: We tested four types of spices: white pepper, black pepper, sweet and hot chili powders from 12 different distributing companies, summing a total of 35 sample types. The fungal and bacterial load was assessed by Standard Plate Count, while the mycotoxin content by High-performance liquid chromatography. Environmental conditions (humidity, pH) and the selling price for each product were also followed. RESULTS: Fungi were observed in 72.7% of black pepper samples, 33.3% in white pepper, 30% in sweet chili and 25% in hot chili products. The most common isolated fungus was Aspergillus spp., while Rhizopus, Mucor, Fusarium, Penicillium, Absidia species were found, in smaller percentage. Four producers (44.4%) presented fungal contamination of over 10^3 CFU/g and two producers (22.2%) presented no fungal contamination in their products. Bacterial contamination was found in 85.7% of the tested products, consisting mostly in Bacillus spp. Aflatoxin B1 was present in all the tested products, mostly in black pepper (mean value 126.3 ng/g); Ochratoxin A was present in sweet chili (mean value 328 ng/g) and Zearalenone in hot chili (mean value 604 ng/g) and sweet chili (mean value 382 ng/g). CONCLUSION: All spices presented either fungal contamination, mycotoxin contamination, or both. The high humidity and the high pH of spices represent favorable conditions for fungal growth. The selling price was partly related to the physic-chemical conditions and microbiological quality of the spices.

Primary antifungal prophylaxis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre audit.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to investigate the prescribing practices of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) and incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients with ALL receiving induction-consolidation chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were to determine risk factors for IFD and resource utilization associated with IFD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with ALL from commencement of induction until completion of consolidation chemotherapy was undertaken from January 2008 to June 2013 in four hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. IFD was classified according to the revised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Cost analysis was performed from an Australian public hospital perspective. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the audit; 83 (85%) received PAP. Most patients (49/83, 59%) switched between two different antifungal agents, predominantly between liposomal amphotericin B and an azole. Five proven/probable and six possible IFD cases were identified. Proven/probable IFD was most common in patients receiving the BFM95 chemotherapy protocol. The incidence of proven/probable IFD was significantly lower in patients receiving PAP compared with those who did not (2/78, 2.6% versus 3/14, 21.4%; P = 0.024). For every five patients receiving PAP, one proven/probable IFD case would be prevented. Proven/probable IFD was associated with an additional median cost of 121,520 Australian dollars (95% CI: 90,781-180,141 Australian dollars; P < 0.001) compared with patients without IFD. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicentre study evaluating PAP use in patients with ALL. With the caveats of interpretation of retrospective, non-randomized data, PAP was associated with a reduced IFD risk.

Posaconazole vs fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis in an Asian teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is superior to fluconazole/itraconazole in preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in neutropenic patients. Whether the higher cost of posaconazole is offset by decreases in IFDs in a given institute requires cost-effective analysis encompassing the spectrum of IFDs and socioeconomic factors specific to that geographic area. METHODS: This study performed a cost-effective analysis of posaconazole prophylaxis for IFDs in an Asian teaching hospital, employing decision modeling and data of IFDs and medication costs specific to the institute, in neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). RESULTS: In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the higher cost of posaconazole was partially offset by a reduction in the cost of treating IFDs that were prevented, resulting in an incremental cost of 125,954 Hong Kong dollars/16,148 USD per IFD avoided. Over a lifetime horizon, assuming same case fatality rate of IFDs in both groups, use of posaconazole results in 0.07 discounted life years saved. This corresponds to an incremental cost of 116,023 HKD/14,875 USD per life year saved. This incremental cost per life year saved in posaconazole prophylaxis fulfilled the World Health Organization defined threshold for cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Posaconazole prophylaxis was cost-effective in Hong Kong.

Meta-Analysis and Cost Comparison of Empirical versus Pre-Emptive Antifungal Strategies in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in hematologic malignancy patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia (FN). These patients therefore often receive empirical antifungal therapy. Diagnostic test-guided pre-emptive antifungal therapy has been evaluated as an alternative treatment strategy in these patients. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search for literature comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal strategies in FN among adult hematologic malignancy patients. We systematically reviewed 9 studies, including randomized-controlled trials, cohort studies, and feasibility studies. Random and fixed-effect models were used to generate pooled relative risk estimates of IFD detection, IFD-related mortality, overall mortality, and rates and duration of antifungal therapy. Heterogeneity was measured via Cochran's Q test, I2 statistic, and between study τ2. Incorporating these parameters and direct costs of drugs and diagnostic testing, we constructed a comparative costing model for the two strategies. We conducted probabilistic sensitivity analysis on pooled estimates and one-way sensitivity analyses on other key parameters with uncertain estimates. RESULTS: Nine published studies met inclusion criteria. Compared to empirical antifungal therapy, pre-emptive strategies were associated with significantly lower antifungal exposure (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.85) and duration without an increase in IFD-related mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36-1.87) or overall mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46-1.99). The pre-emptive strategy cost $324 less (95% credible interval -$291.88 to $418.65 pre-emptive compared to empirical) than the empirical approach per FN episode. However, the cost difference was influenced by relatively small changes in costs of antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to empirical antifungal therapy, pre-emptive antifungal therapy in patients with high-risk FN may decrease antifungal use without increasing mortality. We demonstrate a state of economic equipoise between empirical and diagnostic-directed pre-emptive antifungal treatment strategies, influenced by small changes in cost of antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing, in the current literature. This work emphasizes the need for optimization of existing fungal diagnostic strategies, development of more efficient diagnostic strategies, and less toxic and more cost-effective antifungals.

Budget impact analysis of CYP2C19-guided voriconazole prophylaxis in AML.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the economic impact of proactive, CYP2C19 genotype-guided voriconazole prophylaxis in AML. METHODS: An Excel-based model was created to project the cost of treating a simulated cohort of severely neutropenic AML patients undergoing antifungal prophylaxis. The model compares (i) standard prophylactic dosing with voriconazole and (ii) CYP2C19 genotyping of all AML patients to guide voriconazole dosing and prescribing. RESULTS: Based on the model, genotype-guided dosing of voriconazole conservatively spares 2.3 patients per year from invasive fungal infections. Implementing proactive genotyping of all AML patients in a simulated 100 patient cohort is expected to save a total of $41467 or $415 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The model, based on the robust literature of clinical and economic data, predicts that proactive genotype-guided voriconazole prophylaxis is likely to yield modest cost savings while improving patient outcomes. The primary driver of savings is the avoidance of expensive antifungal treatment and extended hospital stays, costing $30 952 per patient, in patients succumbing to fungal infection.

Cost-benefit Analysis of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole as a Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in High-risk Hematologic Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: Posaconazole is effective for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome during remission induction chemotherapy. However, a cost-benefit analysis of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole has not been conducted in Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for all consecutive patients who received primary antifungal prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy in our acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome cohort from December 2010 to November 2013. Patient characteristics and factors known as a risk of IFI were matched with propensity score analysis. We evaluated the medical cost according to the prophylactic antifungal agents (posaconazole vs fluconazole/itraconazole), the development of breakthrough IFIs, and survival status after propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio. FINDINGS: Of the 419 baseline patients, 100 patients in each group were analyzed after matching. A significant decrease was found in the development of breakthrough proven or probable IFIs (3.0% vs 14.0%; P = 0.009) and the rate of empirical antifungal therapy (EAFT) (12.0% vs 46.0%; P < 0.001) in the posaconazole group. Total in-hospital medical costs per patient were not statistically different between posaconazole and fluconazole/itraconazole prophylaxis. However, the daily medical cost was lower for posaconazole prophylaxis, resulting in a total daily cost savings of $72 (₩79,458) per patient (P = 0.002). In the cases of breakthrough proven/probable IFIs, EAFT, and in-hospital deaths, the total medical costs per patient were significantly higher than in nonproven/probable IFIs, non-EAFT, and in-hospital survivors, as much as $7,916 (₩8,700,758), $4605 (₩5,062,529), and $11,134 (₩12,238,422), respectively. Costs for the antifungal agent used in targeted or empirical therapy were lower in the posaconazole group, resulting in a savings of $697 (₩766,347) per patient (P < 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: Posaconazole appears to be cost beneficial for primary antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancy, at a single center, in Korea. Cost-benefit is closely related with clinical outcomes, including breakthrough IFI development, EAFT, and survival status.