Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endovasc Ther ; 28(3): 474-480, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855876

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Intravascular embolization of hemodialysis and central venous catheters is a rare but potentially serious complication. With the increasing use of catheters in medical practice, we are often faced with this type of complication. Novel, simple, and low-cost techniques are needed for foreign body extraction in order to reduce cardiovascular risks. CASE REPORT: We describe the approach of 5 foreign body embolization cases. Case 1: a 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal failure with a complete fracture and migration of the distal extremity of a hemodialysis catheter. Case 2: a 55-year-old man with an accidental embolization of the distal portion of a hemodialysis catheter. Case 3: a 76-year-old woman with stage IV breast cancer and an accidental embolization of a central venous catheter guidewire. Cases 4 and 5: a 71-year-old woman and a 2-year-old boy with a port-a-cath embolization. All the patients underwent successful minimally invasive removal of the foreign bodies from the thoracic site using 5Fr pigtail catheters. Additional surgery was not required. No further complications, such as damage to the vascular wall, were noted. CONCLUSION: Our experience with the interlacing and traction pigtail show that it is a simple, practical, and low-cost technical alternative and its benefits should be widespread.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos , Migração de Corpo Estranho , Idoso , Cateteres de Demora , Pré-Escolar , Remoção de Dispositivo , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/terapia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico por imagem , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(2): 315-320.e4, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32791305

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) malfunction can result from penetration, fracture, or migration of the device necessitating retrieval. Endovascular and open retrieval of IVCF have been described in institutional series without comparison. This study examines national hospital admissions for IVCF malfunction and compares the outcomes of open and endovascular retrieval. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2017) was reviewed for admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes specific for IVCF malfunction. All ICD-10 procedural codes were reviewed, and patients were divided based on open or endovascular IVCF retrieval. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and costs of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 665 patients admitted with a diagnosis of IVCF malfunction. Open IVCF retrieval was performed in 100 patients and endovascular removal in 90 patients. Of those undergoing open surgery, 45 patients (45%) required median sternotomy and 55 (55%) required abdominal surgeries. Most patients were white females with a mean age of 54.4 years (range, 49.3-59.6 years) with a history of deep venous thrombosis (55.3%) or pulmonary embolism (31.6%). Most patients with IVCF malfunction were treated in large (81.6%) or urban teaching (94.7%) hospitals situated most commonly in the South (42.1%) and Northeast (29.0%) with no difference in characteristics of the patients or the centers between the two groups. Patients undergoing open IVCF retrieval were more likely to undergo surgery on an elective basis compared with endovascular IVCF retrieval (75.0% vs 11.1%; P < .001). Open IVCF retrieval was associated with a higher likelihood of thromboembolic complication compared with endovascular retrieval (20% vs 0%; P = .04). There was a trend toward higher infectious complications and overall complications with endovascular removal, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Open retrieval was associated with a mortality of 5.0% compared with no inpatient mortality with endovascular retrieval (P = .33). The mean hospital length of stay was no difference between the two groups. Open retrieval was associated with significantly higher hospital costs than endovascular retrieval ($34,276 vs $19,758; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Filter removal for patients with IVCF malfunction is associated with significant morbidity and cost, regardless of modality of retrieval. The introduction of specific ICD-10 codes for IVCF malfunction allows researchers to study these events. The development of effective tools for outpatient retrieval of malfunctioning IVCF could decrease related hospitalization and have potential savings for the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Falha de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese , Filtros de Veia Cava/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/economia , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
3.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 8(4): 583-592.e5, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335332

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were first approved for use in the United States in 2003 to address the long-term complications of migration, thrombosis, fracture, and perforation observed with permanent IVC filter implantation. Although Food and Drug Administration approval of retrievable IVC filters includes permanent implantation, the incidence of complications from long-term implantation appears to be greater than that reported with existing permanent IVC filters. Also, only a small fraction of such retrievable IVC filters are ever retrieved. The purpose of the present study was to determine the threshold retrieval rate at which the use of retrievable IVC filters could be justified. METHODS: A Markov decision tree was constructed comparing retrievable and permanent IVC filters regarding their effectiveness and cost. A review of the reported data provided outcome probabilities, and the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry was the source of the utility values for the various potential outcomes. Medicare reimbursement rates served as a proxy for costs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for various parameters, primarily to determine the retrieval rate threshold at which the use of retrievable IVC filters would outperform the use of permanent IVC filters. RESULTS: Base case analysis demonstrated a greater predicted effectiveness for permanent compared with retrievable IVC filter implantation (5.41 quality-adjusted life-years [QALY] vs 5.33 QALY) at a lower cost ($2070 vs $4650). Monte Carlo simulation at 10,000 iterations confirmed the expected utility (5.4 ± 3.0 QALY vs 5.3 ± 3.0 QALY; P = .0002) and cost ($1900 ± $7400 vs $4800 ± 9900; P < .0001) to be statistically superior for permanent IVC filters. A sensitivity analysis for the filter retrieval rate demonstrated that the strategy of using a retrievable IVC filter was never preferable for utility or cost. The superiority of permanent IVC filter placement for effectiveness and cost persisted, regardless of anticipated patient-predicted annual mortality. A two-way sensitivity analysis for both IVC filter removal rate and annual patient mortality confirmed the superiority of permanent IVC filter placement at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted effectiveness of permanent IVC filters was greater and the predicted cost lower than those for retrievable IVC filters, regardless of the IVC filter retrieval rate. This interpretation of existing reported data using Markov decision analysis modeling supports the argument that unless the long-term complication rate of retrievable IVC filters can be significantly improved, their use should be abandoned in favor of currently available permanent IVC filters.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Filtros de Veia Cava/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Desenho de Prótese , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 160-170, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978487

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although recent data on the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are promising, in some cases, the paravisceral segment of the aorta may not be suitable for a branched endograft due to space restrictions. A combination of a fenestrated aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with a thoracic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) may represent a feasible treatment option. The current investigation was performed to assess the stability of a fenestrated Anaconda device implanted into a set of thoracic endografts from different manufacturers. We then assessed our clinical results with the FEVAR/TEVAR combination. METHODS: Pull-out forces were measured in vitro after docking a fenestrated Anaconda graft within the distal end of different TEVAR devices. Anaconda devices were implanted in 28- or 30-mm thoracic tube grafts (oversizing of at least 2 mm: 13.3-21.4; minimum overlap of 15 mm). Continuously increasing longitudinal pull forces of up to 100 N were applied on an Instron Tensile Tester. Initial break point and damage to the endografts were documented. Clinical results of patients treated with such an FEVAR/TEVAR combination at our institution are presented as a second part of this study. RESULTS: Median pull-out forces ranged from 2.38 N to 55.0 N. The highest stability was achieved with 34-mm Anaconda devices in 28-mm thoracic tube grafts. Grafts with either thinner Dacron material or those featuring a polytetrafluorethylene membrane seemed especially vulnerable to punctures and tears caused by the downward-looking hooks of the Anaconda device. Between April 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018, in 28 of 172 patients treated with a fenestrated Anaconda device, prior implantation of a thoracic tube graft was necessary to create a sufficient proximal landing zone. In 25 cases (89.3%), the aneurysm was successfully treated. Although the 30-day reintervention rate in this subgroup was relatively high at 28.6%, none of these was due to a failure of the FEVAR/TEVAR combination. Upon an average follow-up of 15 months, no failure of the graft connection and no type III endoleak due to membrane damage were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a thoracic tube graft and a fenestrated Anaconda device is a viable option for the treatment of patients with Extent I or IV TAAAs with no adequate landing zone above the celiac trunk. Although pull-out testing has shown good stability with most assessed grafts, the thoracic devices with thicker Dacron membranes seemed to be especially suitable.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Falha de Prótese , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endoleak/etiologia , Endoleak/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Teste de Materiais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenotereftalatos , Politetrafluoretileno , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estresse Mecânico , Resistência à Tração , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Vasc Access ; 21(1): 33-38, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159638

RESUMO

The Infusional Services Team at a large cancer centre in Belfast, Northern Ireland, performed a cross-sectional analysis of two catheter securement technologies to address an area of frequent, but underestimated concern - peripherally inserted central catheter migration and dislodgement. Healthcare practitioner and patient feedback, along with economic impact, were assessed. The costs associated with catheter replacement during the adhesive device group study period were calculated using an average cost per insertion, based on material costs required for the procedure. Other factors were the replacement cost of the adhesive engineered securement device with each dressing change. In the subcutaneous securement group, the material costs were adjusted for use of the subcutaneous device as it remained in situ for the duration of the catheters' dwell time. This review found that subcutaneous securement offers both patient and facilities a safe, effective and economical alternative for device securement with patients who are unable to tolerate or have successful securement with adhesive securement devices. The use of subcutaneous devices provided for reduced risks for peripherally inserted central catheters in terms of dislodgement, migration or malposition, alleviating the potential risks to develop catheter-related thrombosis and device-related infection.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Migração de Corpo Estranho/prevenção & controle , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/economia , Cateteres de Demora/economia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/economia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Desenho de Equipamento , Migração de Corpo Estranho/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Irlanda do Norte , Fatores de Tempo , Adesivos Teciduais/efeitos adversos , Adesivos Teciduais/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Endovasc Ther ; 26(5): 697-703, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282253

RESUMO

Purpose: To evaluate chimney stent-graft position and morphological changes of the aneurysm sac as visualized by postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients (mean age 75.7±8.6 years; 20 men) with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms who underwent successful chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR) with the Endurant stent-graft and had 2 postoperative CTAs separated by at least 24 months were included in the study. CTA-based measurements of aortic stent-graft migration, target vessel angle, and chimney angle were compared between the serial scans. Results: During a mean follow-up of 34.9 months (range 24-69.2), the mean migration of the aortic stent-grafts was under 5 mm (2.76±2.4 mm). The average migration distance per year was 1.15 mm. The aneurysm diameter reduced a mean 3.25 mm (p=0.048). The right renal artery angle moved significantly upward 6.72° (p=0.025), while the right renal chimney stent-graft moved significantly downward 7.83° (p=0.042). The left renal artery angle also moved upward 1.87° (p=0.388) and the corresponding chimney moved downward 5.68° (p=0.133). During the study period, no type I/III endoleak or chimney occlusion was observed. Conclusion: Midterm morphometric assessment of ch-EVAR using CTA showed significant aneurysm sac shrinkage and a stable 3-year position of the abdominal devices, with the mean downward migration of the aortic stent-graft being <5 mm in the majority of cases. The chimney grafts seem to be prone to take an oblique rather than parallel configuration during follow-up. However, there was no relevant clinical consequence related to this phenomenon.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aortografia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico por imagem , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Endoleak/etiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 70(6): 1754-1764, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153698

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chimney endovascular aneurysm sealing (ch-EVAS) could potentially minimize gutter-associated endoleaks in patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms resulting from the use of the conformable endobags surrounding the chimney stent grafts (ch-SGs). The aim of the present study was to quantify the (non)apposition of the endobags in the proximal aortic neck, migration of the endograft stent frames, and changes in geometry of the ch-SGs during the follow-up period. METHODS: The prospective data from 20 patients undergoing elective ch-EVAS were retrospectively reviewed. The aortic anatomy was analyzed on preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans. The (non)apposition of the endobags in the aortic neck, Nellix (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) stent frame migration, and chimney graft geometry and migration were assessed. RESULTS: The median preoperative infrarenal neck length was 4.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 0-6.0 mm). The median seal length in the juxtarenal aortic neck at the first follow-up was 23.0 mm (IQR 18.0-30.8 mm). Five type IA endoleaks were identified on postoperative imaging; one at 1 month and four newly diagnosed at 1 year. Of these five type IA endoleaks, two were type Is1 (not extending into the aneurysm sac) and did not need reintervention and other three were type Is2 (extending into the aneurysm sac). One of these patients died of malignancy before reintervention could be performed. Bilateral ch-SG occlusions in one patient were documented at the 1-month follow-up (patient needed hemodialysis) and two patients with a new single ch-SG occlusion were found at the 1-year follow-up. No reinterventions were performed for the ch-SG occlusions. An occluded Nellix stent frame in one patient was treated with femorofemoral crossover bypass. Kaplan-Meier estimate of reintervention-free survival was 85.0% after 1 year. Migration ≥5 mm of the proximal end of the Nellix stent frames was observed in 20.0% of the patients, but no reintervention was performed at the 1-year follow-up. Imaging showed 20.1% of the available sealing surface was not used, and the nonapposition surface increased to 30.6% of the preoperative aortic neck surface at 1 year. Median migration was 3.5 mm (IQR, 2.4-5.0 mm) and 3.1 mm (IQR, 2.0-4.8 mm) for the left and right proximal end of the Nellix stent frames, respectively, and was 3.0 mm (IQR, 2.2-4.8 mm) for the proximal end of the ch-SGs at 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial distal migration of the Nellix endograft and positional changes of the ch-SGs in the juxtarenal aortic neck were observed at 1 year of follow-up, resulting in a 25.0% type IA endoleak rate, with three of these type IA endoleaks extending into the aneurysm sac. The reintervention-free survival rate was 85.0% at 1 year in this cohort of 20 patients. Careful follow-up after ch-EVAS is advised because changes are often subtle. The authors have stopped the ch-EVAS procedure so far. Long-term follow-up data on the stability of the Nellix endograft and the consequences of migration on ch-SGs is required before this technique should be used in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Endoleak/diagnóstico , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Falha de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(2): 330-334, 2019 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30387234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Orbital atherectomy (OA) is routinely being used for plaque modification to facilitate percutaneous revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and arterial calcification. Guidewire fracture (GWF) during OA, though anecdotally described, has not been studied in a systematic manner. We conducted a review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to study the reports of wire fracture and its management and consequences. METHODS: We queried the MAUDE database for all events involving the current generation of the OA device: "Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System", and "Stealth 360° Orbital PAD System". RESULTS: We identified 62 reports of GWF during OA for PAD. The superficial femoral artery was the most commonly involved atherectomy site. The wire fractured at the soft tip in a majority of cases (68%). Embolized wire fragments were left in the patient in 36 cases (58%), retrieved percutaneously in 10 cases (16%), and trapped by a stent against the arterial wall in eight cases (13%). Lastly, eight patients (13%) underwent surgery for removal of the wire fragment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published report to study the complication of GWF during peripheral OA. GWF is an uncommon but has significant procedural and clinical consequences. It results in a high rate of ancillary rescue procedures (including surgery) and is associated with a higher risk of arterial thrombosis and complications from wire retrieval attempts. The risk of wire fracture may be avoided with carefully adherence to the IFU.


Assuntos
Aterectomia/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo , Falha de Equipamento , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Aterectomia/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico por imagem , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Vasc Access ; 18(5): 419-425, 2017 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28777415

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions.The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia.7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions. RESULTS: There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Radiografia Intervencionista/economia , Irrigação Terapêutica/economia , Angiografia Digital/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico por imagem , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , New South Wales , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Irrigação Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 26(2): 184-91, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311559

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) can develop conductor cable externalization and/or electrical failure. Optimal management of these leads remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Markov model compared 4 lead management strategies: (1) routine device interrogation for electrical failure, (2) systematic yearly fluoroscopic screening and routine device interrogation, (3) implantation of new ICD lead with capping of the in situ lead, and (4) implantation of new ICD lead with extraction of the in situ lead. The base case was a 64-year-old primary prevention ICD patient. Modeling demonstrated average life expectancies as follows: capping with new lead implanted at 134.5 months, extraction with new lead implanted at 134.0 months, fluoroscopy with routine interrogation at 133.9 months, and routine interrogation at 133.5 months. One-way sensitivity analyses identified capping as the preferred strategy with only one parameter having a threshold value: when risk of nonarrhythmic death associated with lead abandonment is greater than 0.05% per year, lead extraction is preferred over capping. A second-order Monte Carlo simulation (n = 10,000), as a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, found that lead revision was favored with 100% certainty (extraction 76% and capping 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall there were minimal differences in survival with monitoring versus active lead management approaches. There is no evidence to support fluoroscopic screening for externalization of Riata or Riata ST leads.


Assuntos
Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Prevenção Primária/instrumentação , Conduta Expectante , Simulação por Computador , Cardioversão Elétrica/mortalidade , Desenho de Equipamento , Falha de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/mortalidade , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
J Clin Anesth ; 26(6): 480-4, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25204508

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine, by fiberoptic endoscope, malpositioning of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and other extraglottic devices. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University-affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: 60 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients, aged 20 - 60 years, scheduled to undergo ophthalmic procedures with general anesthesia during controlled ventilation via LMA (Laryseal). MEASUREMENTS: Adequacy of ventilation was determined by the absence of audible leak and appropriate capnograph trace. Fiberoptic assessment and imaging of LMA position were done after proper insertion of the LMA and after one hour of positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Assessment included position of the epiglottis, glottis, and cuff. MAIN RESULTS: The epiglottis was visible in 50 patients (83.3%). Vocal cords were visible in 58 patients at the time of insertion, and in 52 patients after one hour of PPV (P = 0.047). The arytenoids were herniating through the mask aperture after one hour of PPV (P = 0.0132). The cuff position was less optimal after one hour of controlled ventilation (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: LMA position may change spontaneously with time during PPV, especially when the LMA position is not optimum at the time of insertion. The LMA should be adequately inserted with all possible measures in cases with general anesthesia and PPV. Fiberoptic assessment of LMA position intraoperatively may be advantageous.


Assuntos
Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Máscaras Laríngeas , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/métodos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Migração de Corpo Estranho/patologia , Glote/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Curr Opin Urol ; 24(2): 173-8, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24418744

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stone migration during the treatment of ureteral stones can prove frustrating and increases both healthcare cost and patient morbidity. Antiretropulsion devices have been engineered to prevent stone migration. RECENT FINDINGS: Improvements in antiretropulsion devices allow for efficient prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy with minimal adverse effects or complications. Multiple devices are now available each with advantages and disadvantages. New devices are currently engineered to prevent stone migration and maintain ureteral access. Antiretropulsion devices appear to be cost-effective to prevent stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy. SUMMARY: Antiretropulsion devices have been safely and effectively used during ureteroscopic procedures. These tools increase stone-free rates, decrease morbidity and new studies have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness.


Assuntos
Migração de Corpo Estranho/prevenção & controle , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Migração de Corpo Estranho/economia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia/economia , Litotripsia/métodos , Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico , Cálculos Ureterais/economia , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Ureteroscopia/economia
14.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 40(4): 439-44, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24082375

RESUMO

Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is an alternative to antiplatelet or anticoagulative therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke, and it is associated with a small incidence of periprocedural sequelae. Because embolization of PFO closure devices is a very rare procedural complication, data on its frequency, causes, and management are sparse. We sought to review the medical literature and the cases of PFO closure-device embolization at our institution with the aim of identifying likely problems and reporting potential solutions. Out of 310 adult patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure from June 2002 through April 2011, there were 2 cases (0.6%) of PFO closure-device embolization. In both patients, hypermobile septum primum and thick septum secundum were present. In one patient, failure to use a sizing balloon might have resulted in an underestimation of the PFO's size. In both patients, device embolization was identified in a timely fashion, the embolized device was safely retrieved, and the PFO was percutaneously closed with success. The incidence of PFO closure-device embolization is very low. The cases described here underscore the importance of imaging in the identification of morphologic predispositions to closure-device malpositioning, in the recognition of impending embolization, and in the timely management of embolization.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Embolia/etiologia , Forame Oval Patente/terapia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal/efeitos adversos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Embolia/diagnóstico , Embolia/terapia , Feminino , Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Migração de Corpo Estranho/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(7): 956-65, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832002

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the publication of recent guidelines for management of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during endovascular stenting procedures of the thoracic aorta, specific management for those presenting with dissection remains unclear. This systematic review attempts to address this issue. METHODS: Systematic assessment of the published data on thoracic aorta dissection was performed identifying 46 studies, which incorporated 1,275 patients. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of left arm ischemia, stroke, spinal cord ischemia, endoleak, stent migration, and mortality. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without LSA coverage and revascularization incorporating factors such as the number of stents used, length of aorta covered, urgency of intervention, and type of dissection (acute or chronic). Statistical pooling techniques, χ(2) tests, and Fisher's exact testing were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: As compared with other outcomes, LSA coverage without revascularization in the presence of aortic dissection is much more likely to be complicated by left arm ischemia (prevalence increased from 0.0% to 4.0% [p = 0.021]), stroke (prevalence increased from 1.4% to 9.0% [p = 0.009]), and endoleak (prevalence increased from 4.0% to 29.3% [p = 0.001]). However, revascularization was not shown to reverse these effects. Longer aortic coverage (≥ 150 mm) was associated with an increased prevalence of spinal cord ischemia (from 1.3% to 12.5% [p = 0.011]) and mortality (from 1.3% to 15.6% [p = 0.003]). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing endovascular stenting for thoracic aortic dissection, in cases where LSA coverage is necessary, revascularization should be considered before the procedure to avoid complications such as left arm ischemia, stroke, and endoleak, and where feasible, an appropriate preoperative assessment should be carried out.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Stents , Artéria Subclávia/cirurgia , Doença Aguda , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/mortalidade , Braço/irrigação sanguínea , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Doença Crônica , Endoleak/etiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Isquemia do Cordão Espinal/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 51(1): 105-13, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20081766

RESUMO

Endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and branched stentgrafts is in rapid development. Early and midterm results from centers of excellence are very promising but the technique is still in its infancy. With the introduction of EVAR for complex aneurysms a new set of failure modes have also been introduced. These relate both to the specific deployment techniques of the devices and to their intrinsic design characteristics. Procedural planning is of utmost importance for success. Failure to accomplish this may result in disastrous and uncorrectable perioperative failure. The endograft must be correctly tailored to the patient with regards to branch and fenestration positioning and design. Migration of stent-graft components, target vessel occlusions due to branch compression or dislocation and fenestration malpositioning must be recognized during follow up and treated accordingly. The clinical consequences of complex aneurysm repair include spinal cord ischemia and peripheral embolisation and strategies to handle this must be present.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Stents , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Aortografia/métodos , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/etiologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Constrição Patológica , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Isquemia do Cordão Espinal/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Fertil Steril ; 93(1): 29-34, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19022435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess a new hysteroscopic method of tubal sterilization; specifically, to examine the factors associated with placement failure of Essure implants. DESIGN: Observational, multicenter, 6-month study. SETTING: Seven gynecology clinics, including five public hospitals and two private clinics, in France. PATIENT(S): A total of 495 women who provided informed consent. INTERVENTION(S): All procedures were done by a vaginoscopic approach with a 5-mm operating hysteroscope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data collected were age, parity, type of anesthesia, premedication, endometrial aspect, ostia visualization, duration of the procedure, pain during the procedure, and associated procedures. Unilateral and bilateral placement rates were assessed. Adverse events at 3 months (expulsion, migration, perforation) were also recorded. RESULT(S): Mean parity was 2.45; 20 women were nulliparous. In 56.3% of cases (n = 277), none or local anesthesia was used for the placement procedure. Overall, 86% of the women (n = 423) had nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) premedication, and 8.1% (n = 40) had another intrauterine surgical procedure performed at the same time. In 24 cases, at least one of the tubal ostia could not be visualized well during hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION(S): The failure rate for Essure micro-insert placement was 6% at first attempt and 3.3% after two attempts. Success rate was not significantly associated with parity, mode of analgesia, NSAID premedication, or combination with another procedure. The only factor significantly associated with the failure rate was poor visualization of the tubal ostia.


Assuntos
Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Esterilização Tubária/efeitos adversos , Esterilização Tubária/instrumentação , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Desenho de Equipamento , Falha de Equipamento , Tubas Uterinas/lesões , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , França , Humanos , Expulsão de Dispositivo Intrauterino/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Paridade , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Esterilização Tubária/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento
20.
BMC Pulm Med ; 8: 7, 2008 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18423035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMAS) in the treatment benign airway obstruction is controversial. METHODS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SEMAS for this indication, we conducted a 10-year retrospective review at our tertiary medical centre. RESULTS: Using flexible bronchoscopy, 82 SEMAS (67% Ultraflex, 33% Wallstent) were placed in 35 patients with inoperable lesions, many with significant medical comorbidities (88%). 68% of stents were tracheal, and 83% of patients showed immediate symptomatic improvement. Reversible complications developed in 9% of patients within 24 hrs of stent placement. Late complications (>24 hrs) occurred in 77% of patients, of which 37% were clinically significant or required an interventional procedure. These were mainly due to stent migration (12.2%), fracture (19.5%), or obstructive granulomas (24.4%). The overall granuloma rate of 57% was higher at tracheal sites (59%) than bronchial ones (34%), but not significantly different between Ultraflex and Wallstents. Nevertheless, Wallstents were associated with higher rates of bleeding (5% vs. 30%, p = 0.005) and migration (7% vs. 26%, p = 0.026). Of 10 SEMAS removed using flexible bronchoscopy, only one was associated with incomplete removal of fractured stent wire. Median survival was 3.6 +/- 2.7 years. CONCLUSION: Ill patients with inoperable lesions may be considered for treatment with SEMAS.


Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/terapia , Broncopatias/terapia , Granuloma/terapia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Traqueia/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncoscopia , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA