Factors associated with adherence to medications for lowering breast cancer risk between female Medicare beneficiaries in Alabama and nationwide.

PURPOSE: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer (BC) prevention. We examined factors associated with adherence to SERMs/AI treatments among female Medicare beneficiaries in Alabama and those nationwide. METHODS: This retrospective new user cohort study analyzed the 2013-2016 Medicare administrative claims data files (100% Alabama and random 5% national samples). Female Medicare beneficiaries without invasive BC and osteoporosis, continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D for at least 18 months (with a 6-month washout and a 12-month follow-up period) in 2013-2016. Among beneficiaries who initiated (6-month washout) any of the SERMs/AIs (tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, and exemestane), we examined their 1-year treatment adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC) and operationalized as both continuous (0-1) and dichotomized (≥ 80% as adherent and < 80% as non-adherent) outcomes. Multivariable logistic models were used to identify factors associated with adherence (PDC ≥ 80%) among Alabama and national samples, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 885 women in Alabama and 1,213 women in national sample initiated these SERMs/AI treatments. Among those with ≥ 2 prescriptions (n = 479 in Alabama and n = 870 in national sample), Mean PDC was 0.74 [standard deviation (SD) = 0.30] among Alabamian women, similar to those in the national sample [0.71 (SD = 0.31), p = 0.09]. Use of mammography prior to treatment initiation was associated with higher likelihood of adherence to treatments in both samples. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of access to preventive services such as mammography to better adherence to BC preventive treatments among female Medicare beneficiaries.

No Increased Risk of Nonunion with Bisphosphonate Use in a Medicare Claims Cohort Following Operatively Treated Long-Bone Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of a fragility fracture represents an important intervention event for the initiation of medical osteoporosis treatments. However, it is unclear if osteoporosis medications increase the risk of nonunion if administered in the setting of acute fracture. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators/hormone replacement therapy (SERM/HRT) are associated with nonunion following fracture in a Medicare population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare claims from 2016 to 2019 was performed to identify patients ≥65 years of age who had a surgically treated long-bone fracture as identified with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Successive claims were linked for each beneficiary through 1 year following the fracture to determine fracture union status. Multivariable logistic regression models were specified to identify the association between medications and fracture union status while controlling for age, sex, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and fracture type. RESULTS: Of the 111,343 included fractures, 10,452 (9.4%) were associated with a diagnosis of nonunion within 1 year. The nonunion group was younger (79.8 ± 8.3 versus 80.6 ± 8.4 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be White (92.4% versus 90.9%; p < 0.001), and more likely to have a CCI of ≥2 (50.9% versus 49.4%; p < 0.001). Bisphosphonate use was more common in the nonunion group (12.2% versus 11.4%; p = 0.017). When controlling for race, age, sex, and CCI, neither bisphosphonates (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.12]; p = 0.101) nor SERM/HRT (OR, 1.13 [0.93 to 1.36]; p = 0.218) were associated with nonunion. Bisphosphonate use within 90 days post-fracture was not significantly associated with nonunion (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.03]; p = 0.175), and the timing of medication administration did not influence fracture union status. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nonunion after operatively treated long-bone fractures was 9.4%. In this cohort, use of a bisphosphonate or SERM/HRT was not associated with fracture union status at 1 year. Orthopaedic surgeons should not withhold or delay initiating medical therapies for osteoporosis in the setting of acute fracture out of concern for nonunion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Process development for the total synthesis of the novel drug metabolite Carboxy toremifene as a standard reference material along with characterization and purity assessment for the Antidoping quality Control Purposes.

Tamoxifen and toremifene are two selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) commonly used to treat breast cancer in women. Toremifene is well-known as a triphenylethylene derivative. Carboxy toremifene is a common metabolite of toremifene and tamoxifen. Since 2005, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has banned the SERMs category during in and out of competition. These substances are in the S4 category in the WADA prohibited list as "agents with anti-oestrogenic activity." However, there is no commercially accessible carboxy toremifene reference material in the market. This research highlights the novel synthetic procedure, the development of a carboxy toremifene HPLC method, and validation, along with detailed characterization using advanced analytical techniques using 1 H NMR, HRMS, FT-IR-ATR and UV-visible spectroscopy. RP-HPLC-DAD method was developed and validated to assess the purity of carboxy toremifene. Developed reference material has shown 100% purity. Therefore, we recommend that this synthesized carboxy toremifene may be used as reference material to strengthen the WADA-accredited lab to maintain a clean sports mission during sports competitions.

Association of pharmacotherapy with the second hip fracture incidence in women: A retrospective analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan.

AIM: Second hip fractures worsen the quality of life and are associated with increased mortality. We clarified the association between the pharmacotherapy and second hip fracture prevention. METHODS: The relationship between the incidence of second hip fracture and the presence, type and medication possession ratio (MPR) of pharmacotherapy was investigated using medical insurance data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan during April 2012 to March 2019. RESULTS: Data of 776 040 female patients were analyzed. The 2-year rate of second hip fractures was 3.31% (n = 25 684). Bisphosphonates (n = 148 138, 19.1%) were the most commonly used medications after primary hip fracture. Patients receiving selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) had the lowest age, followed by those receiving bisphosphonates, denosumab and parathyroid hormone (PTH). The second hip fracture crude incidence was lowest in patients administered SERMs (n = 859, 2.44%), followed by those administered bisphosphonates (n = 4451, 3.00%), denosumab (n = 484, 3.19%), no medication (n = 19 017, 3.39%) and PTH (n = 873, 5.35%); however, the age-adjusted incidence was the lowest in patients administered denosumab (2.22%), followed by those administered bisphosphonates (2.35%), SERMs (2.39%), no medications (3.39%) and PTH (3.67%). The MPR was highest in patients administered denosumab (60.0%). Among patients without a second hip fracture, the rate of patients with MPR ≥80% was highest among those administered SERMs (40.8%), followed by those administered bisphosphonates (38.0%), denosumab (35.4%) and PTH (12.2%). CONCLUSION: Differences in patient background characteristics and the rate of patients with MPR ≥80% might underlie the observed differences in the crude incidence of second hip fracture among the medication groups. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 930-937.

Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs.

The incidence of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease increases with age, and there are potentially shared mechanistic associations between the two conditions. It is therefore highly relevant to understand the cardiovascular implications of osteoporosis medications. These are presented in this narrative review. Calcium supplementation could theoretically cause atheroma formation via calcium deposition, and in one study was found to be associated with myocardial infarction, but this has not been replicated. Vitamin D supplementation has been extensively investigated for cardiac benefit, but no consistent effect has been found. Despite findings in the early 21st century that menopausal hormone therapy was associated with coronary artery disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE), this therapy is now thought to be potentially safe (from a cardiac perspective) if started within the first 10 years of the menopause. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are associated with increased risk of VTE and may be related to fatal strokes (a subset of total strokes). Bisphosphonates could theoretically provide protection against atheroma. However, data from randomised trials and observational studies have neither robustly supported this nor consistently demonstrated the potential association with atrial fibrillation. Denosumab does not appear to be associated with cardiovascular disease and, although parathyroid hormone analogues are associated with palpitations and dizziness, no association with a defined cardiovascular pathology has been demonstrated. Finally, romosozumab has been shown to have a possible cardiovascular signal, and therefore post-market surveillance of this therapy will be vital.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaginal carbon dioxide laser therapy compared with standard medical therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia.

BACKGROUND: Topical vaginal estrogen therapy is considered the gold standard treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia, but early investigations of energy-based devices show promise for patients with contraindications or those who are refractory to vaginal estrogen cream therapy. Although evaluating safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for novel technologies is critically important when new technologies become available to treat unmet healthcare needs, evaluation of the costs of these new technologies compared with existing therapies is also critically important but often understudied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, including vaginal estrogen therapy, oral ospemifene therapy, and vaginal CO2 laser therapy and determine if vaginal laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause. STUDY DESIGN: An institutional review board-exempt cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by constructing a decision tree using decision analysis software (TreeAge Pro; TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA) using integrated empirical data from the published literature. Tornado plots and 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess how changes in the model's input parameters altered the overall outcome of the cost-effectiveness analysis model. RESULTS: All 3 treatment methods were found to be cost-effective below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000.00 per quality-adjusted life year for moderate dyspareunia. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for vaginal CO2 laser therapy was $16,372.01 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ospemifene therapy was $5711.14. Although all 3 treatment strategies were on the efficient frontier, vaginal CO2 laser therapy was the optimal treatment strategy with the highest effectiveness. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis of treatment adherence, vaginal CO2 laser therapy was no longer cost-effective when the adherence fell below 38.8%. Vaginal estrogen cream and ospemifene therapies remained cost-effective treatment strategies at all ranges of adherence. When varying the adherence to 100% for all strategies, oral ospemifene therapy was "dominated" by both vaginal CO2 laser therapy and vaginal estrogen cream therapy. In a 2-way sensitivity analysis of vaginal CO2 laser therapy adherence and vaginal CO2 laser therapy cost, vaginal CO2 laser therapy still remained the optimal treatment strategy at 200% of its current cost ($5554.00) when the adherence was >55%. When the cost fell to 20% of its current cost ($555.40), it was the optimal treatment strategy at all adherence values above 29%. CONCLUSION: This study showed that vaginal fractional CO2 laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with GSM, as are both vaginal estrogen and oral ospemifene therapies. In our model, vaginal CO2 laser therapy is the optimal cost-effective treatment strategy, and insurance coverage should be considered for this treatment option if it is proven to be safe and effective in FDA trials.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women prescribed ospemifene, selective estrogen receptor modulators for noncancer indications, or untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Ospemifene is a nonsteroidal selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) for the treatment of moderate symptomatic vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) due to menopause. A postauthorization safety study is currently examining the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among postmenopausal women receiving ospemifene or other SERM (raloxifene, bazedoxifene, or tamoxifen, for noncancer indications), or with untreated VVA. METHODS: This interim analysis used the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims database from 2013 to 2017 to identify incident VTE. The incidence rate and 95% confidence interval of VTE during the first continuous course of treatment (or continuous untreated time for the untreated cohort) were calculated for each cohort overall and by age group, with sensitivity analyses examining incidence in the short term (up to 90 days) and long term (all available follow-up, regardless of treatment changes). RESULTS: Analyses included 8,188 ospemifene users, 11,777 other SERM users, and 220,242 women with untreated VVA. The incidence per 1,000 person-years and 95% confidence interval of VTE were 3.7 (1.7-7.1) for ospemifene, 11.5 (8.9-14.6) for other SERM, and 11.3 (10.8-11.7) for untreated VVA. Stratification by age and altering the time frame for analysis produced results with similar patterns to the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis of an ongoing study suggests a favorable safety profile for ospemifene with respect to VTE. Comparative analyses with covariate adjustment will be performed when data accrual is complete.

CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided SERM could be a cost-effective strategy in Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CYP2D6*10 genetic testing for the management of Chinese women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer treated with selective estrogen receptor modulator. Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Robustness of the model was addressed in one-way analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The cost of strategies of tamoxifen, toremifene without genotyping and the strategy base on CYP2D6*10 genotype were $63,879.19, $90,156.60 and $95,021.41, and the quality-adjusted life years gained are 8.1588, 12.89687 and 13.85911, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the CYP2D6*10 testing versus toremifene were 5,055.74221/quality-adjusted life year, respectively. Conclusion:CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided selective estrogen receptor modulator can be a cost-effective strategy in the Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Characteristics and Survival among Users versus Nonusers of Raloxifene.

Raloxifene reduces breast cancer incidence. However, it is unclear whether it also reduces mortality from breast cancer. For raloxifene to reduce incidence but not mortality, breast cancer survival would have to be worse for raloxifene users than nonusers. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare was used to identify women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2007 to 2015 at ages 65-89 who had prior Medicare Part D (prescription drug) enrollment; breast cancer characteristics and survival were assessed among raloxifene regular users (≥180 days in past year) versus nonusers. Logistic regression was used to assess cancer characteristics. Two methods utilizing proportional hazards models were employed to assess breast cancer-specific survival. In method 1, survival was assessed adjusting for demographics, mammography use, and chronic conditions in the subset with Medicare fee-for-service enrollment. In method 2, predicted survival as a function of breast cancer characteristics was modeled in nonusers and the model applied to users to predict survival. A total of 116,317 raloxifene nonusers and 1,223 regular users were identified. Users were significantly more likely to have hormone receptor (HR)-negative cancers, but less likely to have T2+, N1+, and metastatic disease. There were 10,869 and 101 breast cancer-related deaths in nonusers and regular users, respectively. The HR (users vs. nonusers) for breast cancer-specific survival in method 1 was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.22). In method 2, predicted survival was higher in users than nonusers (8-year survival 84.9% vs. 83.4%). Breast cancer-specific survival in raloxifene users was not worse than in nonusers, providing indirect evidence that raloxifene reduces breast cancer-related mortality.

Ospemifene versus local estrogen: adherence and costs in postmenopausal dyspareunia.

Aim: Objective was to compare adherence and persistence, as well as direct healthcare costs and utilization, of ospemifene to available local estrogen therapies (LETs). Patients & methods: This retrospective database study used integrated medical and pharmacy claims data from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - US Database. Results: Ospemifene patients had significantly greater adherence and persistence compared with the other nonring LETs. Ospemifene had the lowest mean outpatient costs of any of the LET cohorts, including the estradiol vaginal ring. Total all-cause healthcare costs were also significantly less for ospemifene patients compared with all other LETs.

N-terminal transactivation function, AF-1, of estrogen receptor alpha controls obesity through enhancement of energy expenditure.

OBJECTIVE: Studies using the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) knock-out (αERKO) mice have demonstrated that ERα plays a crucial role in various estrogen-mediated metabolic regulations. ERα is a ligand dependent transcription regulator and its activity is regulated by estrogenic compounds. ERα consists of two transcriptional activation domains, AF-1 and AF-2. The activities of these domains are regulated through different mechanisms; however, the specific physiological role in metabolic regulation by these domains is still unclear. METHODS: We utilized an ERα AF-2 mutant knock-in mouse (AF2ERKI) to evaluate the physiological functionality of ERα transactivation domains. Due to the estrogen insensitive AF-2 mutation, the phenotypes of AF2ERKI mice are seemingly identical to the global αERKO including obesity in the females. Distinct from the αERKO, the AF-1 function of AF2ERKI mice can be activated by tamoxifen (Tam). Ovariectomized (OVX) AF2ERKI and WT females were treated with Tam and fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 10 weeks. Additionally, indirect calorimetric analysis was performed using metabolic chambers with food intake and locomotor activity recorded for Tam-treated AF2ERKI and αERKO females. RESULTS: Obesity in HFD-fed AF2ERKI females was prevented by Tam treatment; particularly, inguinal fat accumulation was strongly blocked by Tam treatment. Alterations in fat metabolism genes, however, were not found in either inguinal fat nor visceral fat to be Tam-regulated, even though fat accumulation was strongly reduced by Tam treatment. Indirect calorimetric analysis revealed that without alteration of food intake and locomotor activity Tam treatment increased energy expenditure in AF2ERKI but not αERKO females. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the activation of ERα AF-1 prevents fat accumulation. The prevention of obesity through AF-1 is mediated by induction of energy expenditure rather than ERα AF-1 functionality of lipid metabolism gene regulation in fat tissues.

Assessment of the Effects of Age and Renal Function on Pharmacokinetics of Bazedoxifene in Postmenopausal Women.

Bazedoxifene (BZA), a chemically distinct selective estrogen receptor modulator, has demonstrated efficacy and long-term safety in phase 3 placebo-controlled studies for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Here, we assessed the potential effects of age and renal function on BZA pharmacokinetics in healthy postmenopausal women (aged 55-84 years; CLcr, 32-109 mL/min). This was an open-label, single-dose, parallel, nonrandomized inpatient study conducted in healthy postmenopausal women and postmenopausal women with impaired renal function. Each subject received a single oral dose of BZA in a 20-mg tablet. Twenty-six subjects were enrolled: 8 in each of 3 age groups (55-64 years, 65-74 years, ≥75 years) and 2 (aged 71 and 75 years) with mild renal impairment; all subjects received treatment and completed the study. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics were apparent. Although the correlation was modest (R2 = 0.28), BZA CL/F decreased steadily with age, such that the oldest group (>75 years) had a mean CL/F 60% less than the youngest group (55-64 years). Over the observed range of CLcr, there was a weak positive correlation (R2 = 0.19) between BZA CL/F and CLcr.

Successful Targeted Therapies for Breast Cancer: the Worcester Foundation and Future Opportunities in Women's Health.

The signing of the National Cancer Act in 1971 was designed to take laboratory discoveries rapidly from the bench to the bedside. A "war on cancer" had been declared. Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy was predicted to cure all cancers, based on the stunning success in treating childhood leukemia. Breast cancer treatments were primitive; radical mastectomy and radiation were standard of care for disease that had not spread. Ablative endocrine surgery (oophorectomy, hypophysectomy, and adrenalectomy) was a palliative last option for metastatic breast cancer. However, only 30% responded, surviving for only 1 or 2 years: every patient soon died. The discovery of the estrogen receptor (ER) and translation to breast cancer treatment triggered a revolution in women's health. Two important but interconnected events occurred in 1972 at the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology (WFEB) that would exploit the breast tumor ER as the first target to save lives and prevent breast cancer development. Two new groups of medicines-selective ER modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs)-would continue the momentum of research at the WFEB to improve women's health. Here, we recount the important progress made in women's health based on knowledge of the endocrinology of breast cancer. We propose future opportunities in SERM therapeutics to "refresh" the current standards of care for breast cancer treatment. The opportunity is based on emerging knowledge about acquired resistance to long-term adjuvant AI therapy used to treat breast cancer.

Osteoporose: seleção de medicamentos e avanços no manejo clínico / Osteoporosis: medication selection and advances in the clinical management

Osteoporose é um problema de saúde pública importante que acomete mais de metade das mulheres com idade superior a 50 anos. Doença com um enorme impacto sobre a saúde pública, através da morbidade e mortalidade aumentadas, com custos econômicos associados resultantes das fraturas. O objetivo é avaliar e identificar as pessoas de risco para desenvolver fraturas osteoporóticas de fragilidade que necessitam ser tratadas. A abordagem de mulheres com baixa massa óssea e aumento do risco de fraturas deve ser multidisciplinar. A farmacoterapia é apenas uma Steiner ML, Strufaldi R, Fernandes CE das possíveis intervenções. Aspectos como a nutrição orientada, fortalecimento muscular, prevenção de quedas, suplementos vitamínicos e minerais devem ser considerados. O tratamento farmacológico permite a prevenção da perda óssea, a prevenção primária e secundária de fragilidade óssea e deve ser baseado na avaliação do risco de fratura do indivíduo e na relação custo-benefício do medicamento escolhido.

Osteoporosis is a significant public health problem that affects more than half of women aged over 50. This disease has a huge impact on public health through morbidity and increased mortality, and economic costs associated with the resulting fractures. The goal is to assess and identify risk people to develop osteoporotic fragility fractures that need to be addressed. The approach of women with low bone mass and increased risk of fractures should be multidisciplinary. Pharmacotherapy is just one of the possible interventions. Aspects such as the guidance nutrition, muscle strengthening, prevention of falls, mineral and vitamin supplements should be considered. Pharmacological treatment allows preventing bone loss and primary and secondary prevention of osteoporosis and should be based on risk factors and pharmaceutical cost benefit analysis.

Assessment of the potential activity of major dietary compounds as selective estrogen receptor modulators in two distinct cell models for proliferation and differentiation.

Estrogen receptors (ERs) α and ß are distributed in most tissues of women and men. ERs are bound by estradiol (E2), a natural hormone, and mediate the pleiotropic and tissue-specific effects of E2, such as proliferation of breast epithelial cells or protection and differentiation of neuronal cells. Numerous environmental molecules, called endocrine disrupting compounds, also interact with ERs. Phytoestrogens belong to this large family and are considered potent therapeutic molecules that act through their selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) activity. Using breast cancer cell lines as a model of estrogen-dependent proliferation and a stably ER-expressing PC12 cell line as a model of neuronal differentiating cells, we studied the SERM activity of major dietary compounds, such as apigenin, liquiritigenin, daidzein, genistein, coumestrol, resveratrol and zearalenone. The ability of these compounds to induce ER-transactivation and breast cancer cell proliferation and enhance Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) -induced neuritogenesis was assessed. Surprisingly, although all compounds were able to activate the ER through an estrogen responsive element reporter gene, they showed differential activity toward proliferation or differentiation. Apigenin and resveratrol showed a partial or no proliferative effect on breast cancer cells but fully contributed to the neuritogenesis effect of NGF. However, daidzein and zearalenone showed full effects on cellular proliferation but did not induce cellular differentiation. In summary, our results suggest that the therapeutic potential of phytoestrogens can diverge depending on the molecule and the phenotype considered. Hence, apigenin and resveratrol might be used in the development of therapeutics for breast cancer and brain diseases.

Eficacia y seguridad de fulvestrant en pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos, no tributarios a quimioterapia, que ha progresado a inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos / Efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, non-tributary to chemotherapy, who has progressed to non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente informe expone la evaluación de eficacia y seguridad del uso de fulvestrant en el manejo de pacientes post-menopáusicas, con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos, progresivo a inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos con control de enfermedad visceral y de partes blandas con quimioterapia basada en taxanos con toxicidad limitante (i.e., no tributarios a quimioterapia sistémica). Aspectos Generales: El cáncer de mama es el tipo de cáncer que se diagnostica con mayor frecuencia entre mujeres a nivel mundial. En el Perú, del total de cánceres reportados entre los años 2006 a 2011, el cáncer de mama fue el tercer tipo de cáncer más frecuente en toda la población (10.3%) y el segundo tipo de cáncer más frecuente entre mujeres (16.6%). Aproximadamente 34 de cada 100 mil mujeres al año es diagnosticada con cáncer de mama, con una tasa de mortalidad de 14 por cada 100 mil mujeres diagnosticadas. El cáncer de mama metastásico es la principal causa de muerte dentro de los pacientes con cáncer de mama. Más del 90% de pacientes con cáncer de mama muere por metástasis. Tecnologia Sanitaria de Interés: Fulvestrant (nombre comercial Faslodex), es una terapia antiestrogénica de tipo SERDs. Esta terapia está indicada para el tratamiento de cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores estrogénicos positivos en mujeres post-menopáusicas que han progresado luego de terapia antiestrogénica. Fulvestrant disminuye la actividad de los receptores de estrógeno, presenta actividad anti-proliferativa, induce apoptosis, no posee actividad agonista de estrógeno y carece de resistencia cruzada con otras terapias antiestrogénicas, tales como los SERMs. METODOLOGIA: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de fulvestrant para el tratamiento de cáncer de mama con receptores estrogénicos positivos metastásico, en pacientes no tributarios a quimioterapia, que han progresado a inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos. Esta búsqueda se realizó utilizando los meta-buscadores: Translating Research into Practice (TRIPDATABASE), National Library of Medicine (Pubmed-Medline) y Health Systems Evidence. RESULTADOS: Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se realizó la búsqueda bibliográfica y de evidencia científica hasta Junio 2016 para el sustento del uso de fulvestrant en el tratamiento de cáncer de mama positivo a receptores hormonales metastásico, en pacientes no tributarios a quimioterapia que han progresado a inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos. Se presenta la evidencia\r\ndisponible según el tipo de publicación priorizada en los criterios de inclusión (i.e., GP, ETS, RS y ECA fase III). CONCLUSIONES: El presente documento evaluó la evidencia científica publicada hasta Julio del 2016 para el uso fulvestrant en mujeres post-menopáusicas con cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos que han progresado a tratamientos previos con inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos. Existen pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos que progresan a terapia hormonal estándar con inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos, en quienes la quimioterapia no está indicada, dejando limitadas alternativas para su tratamiento. En la actualidad, el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud cuenta con exemestano, un inhibidor de aromatasa esteroideo, por lo tanto es necesario probar que fulvestrant es una alternativa superior a exemestano en relación a los desenlaces considerados en el presente dictamen. Fulvestrant, es una alternativa de terapia hormonal se segunda línea. Sin embargo, esta no ha probado ser mejor que exemestano para ninguno de los desenlaces de interés, a pesar de ello, el costo de este medicamento es considerablemente elevado en relación al que actualmente se encuentra en el petitorio farmacológico de EsSalud. El Instituto de evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) no aprueba el uso de fulvestrant para el tratamiento endocrino de cancer de mama con receptores hormonales positivos metastásico en mujeres post-menopaúsicas no tributarias a quimioterapia que han progresado a terapia con inhibidores de aromatasa no esteroideos.

Conjugated estrogens and bazedoxifene in minority populations: pooled analysis of four phase 3 trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of conjugated estrogens (CE)/bazedoxifene (BZA) for treatment of menopausal symptoms and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis in minorities (black/Hispanic) versus whites. METHODS: In a post hoc analysis, data were pooled from 3,424 white or minority nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women randomized to CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg or placebo in four double-blind, phase 3 Selective Estrogens, Menopause, and Response to Therapy (SMART) trials. Outcomes included hot flush frequency/severity (daily diary) in women with at least seven moderate-to-severe hot flushes per day (SMART-1, -2), vaginal cytology in women with at most 5% superficial cells (SMART-1, -3), lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) (SMART-1, -5), and the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire (SMART-1, -2, -3, -5). RESULTS: The analysis included 2,907 white (84.9%), 315 black (9.2%), and 202 Hispanic (5.9%) women. The reduction in hot flush frequency/severity versus placebo (P < 0.05; week 12) was similar in white and minority women. In both populations, both doses significantly (P < 0.05 vs placebo) improved MENQOL vasomotor function, sexual function, and total scores at 3 months; decreased the percentage of parabasal cells at 2 years; and increased the percentage of BMD responders at 12 and 24 months. Significant differential treatment effects by race/ethnicity were observed only for effects on vaginal superficial cells at month 24 and vaginal pH at month 3. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding a limited sample size, CE/BZA had a similar and beneficial impact on hot flushes, MENQOL, and BMD in minorities and whites.

Endocrine therapy for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women: clinical and economic considerations.

The global burden of breast cancer highlights the need for primary prevention strategies that demonstrate both favorable clinical benefit/risk profile and good value for money. Endocrine therapy with selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has been associated with a favorable clinical benefit/risk profile in the prevention of breast cancer in women at high risk of developing the disease. The available endocrine therapy strategies differ in terms of their relative reductions of breast cancer risk, potential side effects, and upfront drug acquisition costs, among others. This review highlights the clinical trials of SERMs and AIs for the primary prevention of breast cancer, and the cost-effectiveness /cost-utility studies that have examined their "value for money" in various health care jurisdictions.

The selective estrogen receptor modulators in breast cancer prevention.

BACKGROUNDS: Persistently increased blood levels of estrogens are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are a class of compounds that act on the estrogen receptor (ER). METHODS: Several clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of its prophylactic administration. Incidence of invasive ER-positive breast cancer was reduced by SERMs treatment, especially for those women with high risk of developing breast cancer. In this study, we reviewed the clinical application of SERMs in breast cancer prevention. RESULTS: To date, four prospective randomized clinical trials had been performed to test the efficacy of tamoxifen for this purpose. Concerning on the benefit and cost of tamoxifen, various studies from different countries demonstrated that chemoprevention with tamoxifen seemed to be cost-effective for women with a high risk of invasive breast cancer. Based above, tamoxifen was approved for breast cancer prevention by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1998. Raloxifene was also approved for postmenopausal women in 2007 for breast cancer prevention which reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer with a lower risk of unwanted stimulation of endometrium. Thus, raloxifene is considered to have a better clinical possesses as prophylactic agent. Several other agents, such as arzoxifene and lasofoxifene, are currently being investigated in clinic. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network had published guidelines on breast cancer chemoprevention by SERMs. However, use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for primary breast cancer prevention was still low. CONCLUSION: A broader educational effort is needed to alert women and primary care physicians that SERMs are available to reduce breast cancer risk.

Persistence and discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer.

AIMS: Although 8-73 % of breast cancer patients who receive adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinue it, discontinuation is little studied in Asian breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine frequency and reasons for discontinuation at a single institution, we reviewed records and database information for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were treated at the National Kyushu Cancer Center 2001-2006, defining "persistence" as continued endocrine treatment (even when physicians decided to stop because of recurrent disease or severe adverse effects), and "discontinuation" as ending therapy due to patient's wishes. RESULTS: Among 686 patients who started adjuvant endocrine therapy, 607 patients (88 %) persisted, 79 patients (12 %) discontinued. Of the 79 patients who discontinued, 37 (46 %) did so because of side effects, 26 (33 %) stopped appointments, 11 (14 %) stopped for "no particular reason", 4 (5 %) to get pregnant, and 1 (1 %) for economic reasons. The rate of persistence was higher in patients with lymph node involvement than in those without lymph node involvement (92 vs. 87 %; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should discuss side effects with patients, both as part of informed consent and to prepare them to continue therapy, and should be aware that over time, patients' reasons for discontinuation change.