Fluoroquinolone Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Post-Traumatic Bacterial Infectious Endophthalmitis: Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Evaluate the Probability of Success.

Purpose: Patients with open globe injuries routinely receive fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis to prevent bacterial infectious endophthalmitis. Owing to the rarity of this infection, there is an absence of clinical trials evaluating optimal prophylactic FQ dosing. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)-based study to identify the FQ dosing option(s) that optimize pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic FQ target attainment against common bacterial pathogens implicated in post-traumatic bacterial infectious endophthalmitis (PTBIE). Methods: Weighted mean pharmacokinetic parameters and standard deviations for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were calculated from published studies in healthy volunteers. The incidence and FQ susceptibility profiles for the most common bacteria causing PTBIE were extracted from the literature. MCS was used to determine the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for 5 FQ dosing options to determine the probability of attaining pathogen-specific target 24-hour area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios in the vitreous humor of the eye against the 4 most common causative bacteria seen in PTBIE. Results: Moxifloxacin 400 mg po daily (M400) achieved the highest CFR (72%). Levofloxacin dosing options achieved CFRs between 54% and 63%. Ciprofloxacin dosing options achieved CFRs between 28% and 35%. Conclusion: M400 optimized the likelihood of prophylactic success in the prevention of PTBIE, and based on the study findings, M400 is predicted to optimize the probability of success compared with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin dosing options currently endorsed by expert opinion.

Paediatric ocular super glue injuries: assessment of two cases.

In this report, we elaborate the clinical findings and the optimal management of two cases with ocular glue injuries in two paediatric patients. Both the patients were presented to the ocular emergency with completely closed eyelid and periocular erythema. The eyelids were completely closed due to matting of the eyelashes with glue retention up to lash roots. Thus, in both cases, after the application of local anaesthetic agent, immediate lash trimming was performed along with the removal of crystallised glue particles. However, the ocular surface showed only congestion in absence of any added corneal complications. Patients were followed up with standard treatment protocol as per chemical injuries. Until the end of 5 months, the clinical course was uneventful.

Intracameral moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis after cataract surgery: Cost-effectiveness analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of intracameral moxifloxacin compared with traditional antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. SETTING: Theoretical surgical center in the United States. DESIGN: Evaluation of technology. METHODS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were calculated for patients having cataract surgery with traditional antibiotic prophylaxis (perioperative topical antibiotics) compared with perioperative topical antibiotics with intracameral moxifloxacin. The base case was a healthy binocular 73-year-old man having first-eye cataract surgery. The incidences and costs were derived from PubMed English literature searches, Medicare reimbursement rates, and average wholesale prices. All costs and benefits were adjusted 3% per annum and for inflation to 2017 United States dollars. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with traditional prophylaxis, an adjuvant 500 µg intracameral moxifloxacin (for $20) was cost-saving from a societal perspective in the base case; in probabilistic sensitivity analyses, all the values were within the societal willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs), and 6142 (61%) of 10 000 iterations were cost-saving. From a healthcare sector perspective, intracameral moxifloxacin was cost-effective, with an ICUR of $8275/QALY. In cases with posterior capsule tears, a $20 intracameral moxifloxacin was cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective in the U.S., a topical perioperative antibiotic with a 500 µg intracameral moxifloxacin costing $22 dollars or less was cost-effective and cost-saving. From a healthcare sector perspective, a $20 intracameral moxifloxacin was cost-effective but not cost-saving. Adjuvant intracameral moxifloxacin had greater effectiveness in improving QALYs than topical antibiotics.

Improving treatment outcome assessment in a mouse tuberculosis model.

Preclinical treatment outcome evaluation of tuberculosis (TB) occurs primarily in mice. Current designs compare relapse rates of different regimens at selected time points, but lack information about the correlation between treatment length and treatment outcome, which is required to efficiently estimate a regimens' treatment-shortening potential. Therefore we developed a new approach. BALB/c mice were infected with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strain and were treated with rifapentine-pyrazinamide-isoniazid-ethambutol (RpZHE), rifampicin-pyrazinamide-moxifloxacin-ethambutol (RZME) or rifampicin-pyrazinamide-moxifloxacin-isoniazid (RZMH). Treatment outcome was assessed in n = 3 mice after 9 different treatment lengths between 2-6 months. Next, we created a mathematical model that best fitted the observational data and used this for inter-regimen comparison. The observed data were best described by a sigmoidal Emax model in favor over linear or conventional Emax models. Estimating regimen-specific parameters showed significantly higher curative potentials for RZME and RpZHE compared to RZMH. In conclusion, we provide a new design for treatment outcome evaluation in a mouse TB model, which (i) provides accurate tools for assessment of the relationship between treatment length and predicted cure, (ii) allows for efficient comparison between regimens and (iii) adheres to the reduction and refinement principles of laboratory animal use.