Assessment of salivary alpha amylase and mucin-4 before and after non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

BACKGROUND: The present study was based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in clinicoradiographic parameters and whole salivary alpha amylase (AA) and mucin-4 levels before and after non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) of patients with peri-implant mucositis (PM). The aim was to assess whole salivary AA and mucin-4 levels before and after treatment of PM. METHODS: Patients with PM (Group-1) and individuals without peri-implant diseases (Group-2) were included. Demographic data was collected and peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices (mPI and mBI, respectively), probing depth (PD) and crestal bone loss were measured at baseline. Levels of AA and mucin-4 were assessed in unstimulated whole saliva samples. All patients underwent full-mouth non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) and NSMD; and clinical parameters and salivary biomarkers were re-assessed after 3 months. Level of significance was set at P < 0.01. RESULTS: Twenty-six and 32 individuals were included in groups 1 and 2, respectively. None of the participants had periodontitis. At baseline clinical periodontal parameters (PI [P < 0.001], GI [P < 0.001], clinical AL [P < 0.001] and PD [P < 0.001]) were significantly high in Group-1 than Group-2. At 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in clinical periodontal and peri-implant parameters (PI [P < 0.01], GI [P < 0.01], and PD [P < 0.01]) in Group-1 compared with their baseline values. At baseline, salivary AA levels were significantly high in Group-1 than Group-2 (P < 0.01). At 3-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in whole salivary AA levels among patients in groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The AA and mucin-4 levels are potential biomarkers for evaluation of peri-implant diseases including PM. Mechanical instrumentation continues to be the most predictable treatment option for the management of peri-implant diseases.

Assessment of dose-response relationship of 5-fluorouracil to murine intestinal injury.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently prescribed anti-tumor drug, but has been reported to result in intestinal injury. Although some progress has been made in understanding the intestinal toxicity of 5-FU, confusion remains about animal models of 5-FU-induced intestinal injury, especially the dosage of 5-FU. This study aims to assess the dose-response relationship between the severity of intestinal injury and different doses of 5-FU, and to determine a proper dosing for the murine model. We found that mice in the 5-FU groups gradually lost body weight over time. Increasing doses of 5-FU resulted in more severe diarrhea, with a concomitant increase in mortality. Histopathological damage was more severe in mice that received higher doses of 5-FU. In addition, plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) activity decreased in experimental mice with intestinal injury in a dose-dependent way. TUNEL and western blot analysis showed cell apoptosis in the ileum and colon related to 5-FU dosage. However, administration of 200 and 400 mg/kg 5-FU caused extremely high mortality, severe diarrhea and histopathological damage, but 25 mg/kg 5-FU did not result in significant intestinal injury. The severity of intestinal injury induced by 5-FU appeared to be dose-dependent and we concluded that the proper dosage of 5-FU to induce a murine model with intestinal mucositis ranged from 50 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg.