Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Cyst Fibros ; 18(6): 823-828, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126899

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The daily burden of health maintenance for children and families with cystic fibrosis (CF) is immense with respect to time and complexity of care. Infection control practices, specifically nebulizer cleaning and disinfection, are a recommended component of home health care for CF families due to colonization of home respiratory equipment with lung pathogens. To better inform education interventions at our center, we were interested in studying how families' views on infection prevention and awareness of CF Foundation infection prevention and control (IP&C) guidelines correlate with actual home nebulizer care and the presence of microorganisms on their nebulizers. METHODS: Twenty families who have children with CF were surveyed to better understand attitudes toward infection prevention, awareness of CFF IP&C guidelines and nebulizer cleaning and disinfection practices in the home. Their nebulizers were also cultured for microbes to correlate recovery with infection control behaviors. RESULTS: A subset of families recognizes the importance of germ avoidance but do not recognize nebulizer cleaning and disinfection as very important for infection control practices. Decreased frequency of disinfection, but not cleaning, was correlated with the recovery of organisms on the nebulizers. CONCLUSIONS: The study questionnaire results identify a gap between recognizing the importance of infection prevention and consistently implementing CFF IP&C guidelines in the home. This demonstrates the need at our center for new educational interventions to promote cleaning and disinfection of home nebulizers after each use as recommended by the CFF.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Fibrose Cística , Desinfecção , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Autocuidado , Administração por Inalação , Atitude , Criança , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Cística/psicologia , Desinfecção/métodos , Desinfecção/normas , Saúde da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/psicologia
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 127(8): 799-801, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23899822

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of contamination of lidocaine hydrochloride 5 per cent weight/volume and phenylephrine hydrochloride 0.5 per cent weight/volume topical solution, both in patients (in vivo) and in the laboratory setting (in vitro). METHODS: This paper reports a prospective study involving 10 samples of the lidocaine hydrochloride and phenylephrine hydrochloride topical anaesthetic spray. The samples were assessed for microbiological contamination after a single use on patients in a controlled laboratory environment. Additional samples were assessed for baseline contamination and later assessed for contamination in an in vitro setting. RESULTS: In the in vivo setting, 2 of the 10 samples were positive for cultures from both the pump and the bottles. However, in the in vitro setting, the pump and the contents of the bottles were contaminated after a single use when the sterile solution was sprayed from distances of 1 and 2 cm. CONCLUSION: The lidocaine hydrochloride and phenylephrine hydrochloride topical solution assembly was contaminated in both in vivo and in vitro settings after a single use.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Anestésicos Locais/economia , Infecção Hospitalar , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Endoscopia , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Fenilefrina/uso terapêutico
3.
Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP ; 42(2): 276-281, jun. 2008. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS, BDENF - Enfermagem | ID: lil-486526

RESUMO

Kits para aerossol são artigos utilizados na terapêutica de afecções do trato respiratório e requerem no mínimo desinfecção de nível intermediário para reuso. Os objetivos deste estudo foram verificar uma possível contaminação microbiana em kits para aerossol pós-reprocessamento e identificar os microrganismos isolados. Estudo transversal, experimental realizado na unidade pediátrica de um hospital em Goiânia-GO. Coletaram-se amostras de três segmentos (máscara, copo, interior da extensão) de 15 kits previamente desinfetados, que foram semeadas em diferentes meios de culturas e os microrganismos isolados foram identificados por provas bioquímicas. Dos 15 kits analisados, 13 copos, nove extensões e 13 máscaras estavam contaminados. Isolou-se no total 101 UFC, 39 provindos dos copos, 20 das extensões e 42 das máscaras. Dentre os patógenos isolados destaca-se: Staphylococcus coagulase positivo, Staphylococcus coagulase negativo, Bastonetes Gram negativo fermentadores, Bastonetes Gram negativo não fermentadores, micrococose leveduras. A detecção microbiana indica prováveis falhas no reprocessamento desses artigos.


Aerosol kits are used in treatments of respiratory illnesses and require at least an intermediate level of disinfection for their reuse. The objectives of the study were to verify possible contamination of kits after they were processed as well as to identify the microorganisms that were isolated in them. This transversal experimental study was conducted in the pediatric unit of a hospital in Goiânia, State of Goiás. Samples were collected from three different parts (masks, cups and hoses) of 15 previously disinfected kits and placed in different culture media, and the microorganisms that were isolated were identified through biochemical tests. Of the kits that were analyzed, 13 cups, 9 hoses and 13 masks were found to be contaminated. A total of 101 CFU were isolated 39 from the cups, 20 from the hoses, and 42 the masks. Among the pathogens found were coagulase-positive Staphylococci, coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Gram negative fermenter rods, Gram negative nonfermenter rods, micrococcus and yeast. Microbial presence indicates probable inefficiencies in processing these items.


Kits para aerosol son artículos utilizados en la terapéutica de afecciones del tracto respiratorio y requieren en lo mínimo desinfección a nivel intermediario para volver a ser usado. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron verificar una posible contaminación microbiológica en kits para aerosol post-reprocesamiento e identificar los microorganismos aislados. Se trata de un estudio transversal, experimental realizado en la unidad pediátrica de un hospital en Goiânia-GO. Se recolectaron muestras de tres segmentos (máscara, vaso, interior de la extensión) de 15 kits previamente desinfectados, que fueron sembradas en diferentes medios de cultivo y los microorganismos aislados fueron identificados por pruebas bioquímicas. De los 15 kits analizados, 13 vasos, nueve extensiones y 13 máscaras estaban contaminados. Se aisló un total de 101 UFC, 39 provenientes de los vasos, 20 de las extensiones y 42 de las máscaras. Entre los patógenos aislados se destacan: Staphylococcus coagulase positivo, Staphylococcus coagulase negativo, Bastones Gram negativo fermentadores, Bastones Gram negativo no fermentadores, micrococosy levaduras. La detección microbiológica indica probables fallas en el reprocesamiento de esos artículos.


Assuntos
Contaminação de Equipamentos , Instalações de Saúde , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais
4.
Am J Rhinol ; 19(1): 21-3, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15794070

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Venturi principle atomizers have been criticized for potential contamination and disease transmission when used for nasal application. A recent laboratory study reported a high rate of contamination of these atomizers after their tips were immersed and sprayed into a broth containing Staphylococcus aureus. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Venturi-type atomizers used regularly at a busy referral center for sinonasal disorders were contaminated with bacteria. METHODS: Fifteen Venturi-type atomizers containing 2% lidocaine (four bottles), 4% lidocaine (three bottles), or 0.05% oxymetazoline (eight bottles) were sprayed onto blood agar plates. All atomizer bottles had been in routine use in a tertiary rhinology clinic for 1 month. The contents within each bottle's reservoir also were cultured. Thus, the total sample size was 30 plates. Then, the plates were incubated at 35 degrees C for 48 hours and then at room temperature for 72 hours. RESULTS: Three of our 30 plates grew one colony each of Gram-positive bacilli, Gram-positive cocci, and Staphylococcus species. CONCLUSION: The rare growth of any bacteria seen in our samples could as likely represent contamination during processing and handling of the plates as contamination of the atomizers themselves. Thus, Venturi-type atomizers may not have a high potential contamination risk, which has been suggested by previous reports.


Assuntos
Contaminação de Equipamentos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Desenho de Equipamento , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Teste de Materiais , Esterilização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA