Application of 3D printing surgical training models in the preoperative assessment of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: To explore the application effect of 3D printing surgical training models in the preoperative assessment of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy surgery between January 2022 and December 2023 were selected and divided into two groups according to the chronological order. The control group (n = 40) received preoperative assessment with verbal and video education from January 2022 to December 2022, while the observation group (n = 40) received preoperative assessment with 3D printing surgical training models combined with verbal and video education from January 2023 to December 2023. The preoperative anxiety, information demand score, and surgical awareness were compared between the two groups. The physiological stress indicators, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), angiotensin II (AT II), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol (Cor), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), were also measured at different time points before and after surgery.They were 6:00 am on the day before surgery (T0), 6:00 am on the day of the operation (T1), 6:00 am on the first day after the operation (T2), and 6:00 am on the third day after the operation (T3).The preparation rate before surgery was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The anxiety and surgical information demand scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group before anesthesia induction, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Both groups had lower scores before anesthesia induction than before preoperative assessment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The physiological stress indicators at T1 time points were lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The overall means of the physiological stress indicators differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the T0 time point, the T1, T2, and T3 time points in both groups were significantly lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The surgical awareness and preparation rate before surgery were higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The preoperative assessment mode using 3D printing surgical training models combined with verbal and video education can effectively reduce the psychological and physiological stress responses of surgical patients, improve their surgical awareness, and enhance the preparation rate before surgery.

Design and utilisation of a novel, high-fidelity, low-cost, hybrid-tissue simulation model to facilitate training in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has rapidly evolved as the standard of care for appropriately selected renal tumours, offering key patient benefits over radical nephrectomy or open surgical approaches. Accordingly, RAPN is a key competency that urology trainees wishing to treat kidney cancer must master. Training in robotic surgery is subject to numerous challenges, and simulation has been established as valuable step in the robotic learning curve. However, simulation models are often both expensive and suboptimal in fidelity. This means that the number of practice repetitions for a trainee may limited by cost restraints, and that trainees may struggle to reconcile the skills obtained in the simulation laboratory with real-world practice in the operating room. We have developed a high-fidelity, low-cost, customizable model for RAPN simulation based on porcine tissue. The model has been utilised in teaching courses at our institution, confirming both feasibility of use and high user acceptability. We share the design of our model in this proof-of-concept report.

Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

RAPN training usually takes place in-vivo and methods vary across countries/institutions. No common system exists to objectively assess trainee capacity to perform RAPN at predetermined performance levels prior to in-vivo practice. The identification of objective performance metrics for RAPN training is a crucial starting point to improve training and surgical outcomes. The authors sought to examine the reliability, construct and discriminative validity of objective intraoperative performance metrics which best characterize the optimal and suboptimal performance of a reference approach for training novice RAPN surgeons. Seven Novice and 9 Experienced RAPN surgeons video recorded one or two independently performed RAPN procedures in the human. The videos were anonymized and two experienced urology surgeons were trained to reliably score RAPN performance, using previously developed metrics. The assessors were blinded to the performing surgeon, hospital and surgeon group. They independently scored surgeon RAPN performance. Novice and Experienced group performance scores were compared for procedure steps completed and errors made. Each group was divided at the median for Total Errors score, and subgroup scores (i.e., Novice HiErrs and LoErrs, Experienced HiErrs and LoErrs) were compared. The mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) for scoring was 0.95 (range 0.84-1). Compared with Novices, Experienced RAPN surgeons made 69% fewer procedural Total Errors. This difference was accentuated when the LoErr Expert RAPN surgeon's performance was compared with the HiErrs Novice RAPN surgeon's performance with an observed 170% fewer Total Errors. GEARS showed poor reliability (Mean IRR = 0.44; range 0.0-0.8), for scoring RAPN surgical performance. The RAPN procedure metrics reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced surgeon performances. They further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experiences. Reliable and valid metrics will underpin quality-assured novice RAPN surgical training.

Single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience and lessons learned for successful outcomes.

The Intuitive Surgical DaVinci SP ("Single Port") robotic platform was approved in 2014, but, recently, there has been a dissemination of the technology with multiple urological procedures successfully adapted to this robot. There are some important differences from prior models. We aimed to share our early outcomes and lessons learned for performing successful single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (SP-RAPN). This study is a retrospective review of sequential SP-RAPN cases between 7/2019 and 3/2020. We extracted patient characteristics and early surgical outcomes. Surgical tips and tricks were recorded during these cases and compiled. SP-RAPN was successfully completed in 12 patients. Patients mean age was 57.8 ± 11.0 years and median ASA score was 2. Mean tumor size was 3.1 ± 2.2 cm. The average OR Time was 172 ± 41 min and EBL was 68 ± 75 mL. All cases had warm ischemia time < 25 min. Tumor pathology included 8 RCC (6 pT1a, 1 pT1b, 1 pT2a), 2 AML, and 2 oncocytoma. There were no complications. Our top surgical tips involved: (1) patient positioning, (2) port placement, (3) insufflation, (4) air docking, (5) assistant port placement, (6) dynamic arm control, (7) hilar clamping, (8) camera relocation, (9) tumor excision, and (10) extraction and port closure. SP-RAPN is safe and feasible in this series. There are advantages and disadvantages to this platform. As the technology matures and techniques evolve, SP-RAPN may become more appealing. Future studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the SP system.

Assessment of Advanced Perioperative Outcomes to Identify the True Learning Curve of Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the learning curve of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy as it pertains to operative time (OT) and advanced perioperative variables such as achievement of trifecta, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rates (RR), warm ischemia time (WIT), and functional volume loss (FVL). METHODS: We evaluated 418 consecutive robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy performed by a single surgeon between February 2008 and April 2019. Multivariable log-log regression models were used to evaluate the associations between case number and continuous outcomes (OT, WIT, and FVL). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of case number with dichotomous outcomes (trifecta, postoperative complications, RR). RESULTS: Among the 406 eligible patients included in the study, 252 (62.1%) were male, median age was 63 years (range, 22-84), and median body mass index was 29 kg/m2 (interquartile range 26-33). Surgeon experience was associated with shorter OT (-2.5% per 50% increase in case number; 95% confidence interval; P <.001) and plateaus around 77 cases performed. There was slight improvement with trifecta (odds ratio [per 50% increase in cases] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval) and the plateau was also at 77 cases, however, this was not statistically significant (P = .086). We did not find statistically significant associations of surgeon experience with FVL (P = .77), postoperative complications (P = .74), WIT (P = .73), or 30-day RR (P = .33). CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be a relationship between surgical experience and grade 3 or higher postoperative complications, 30-day RR, WIT, or FVL. Trifecta outcomes and maximum OT performance appear to be optimized at approximately 77 cases.

Extirpative renal surgery volume in training: different roads to the (same?) destination.

PURPOSE: To describe the overall extirpative renal surgery (ERS) training volume reported by PU and PS. METHODS: Case log data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) was examined from 2013-2016 for surgery residents (Sres), urology residents (Ures), pediatric surgery fellows (PSfel) and pediatric urology fellows (PUfel). Case log information for all levels of participation over all case categories that could potentially offer ERS volume were recorded. Volume was estimated using the mean number of included cases during residency and fellowship and the sum was used to estimate total training volume. Volume between groups was compared using the student's t test. RESULTS: Case logs were included for 4447 residents (4259 Sres, 840 Ures) and fellows (188 PSfel, 71 PUfel). Mean PU volume was 113.1, which was higher than the mean PS volume of 10.3 (p < 0.001). For PU, more ERS were performed during residency than fellowship (p < 0.001). For PS the opposite was true (p < 0.001). When examining fellow training only, PUfel performed more ERS than PSfel (11.7 vs. 7.0 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While previous publications note similar short-term outcomes for ERS for malignancy for PU and PS, ERS case volume during training is significantly different. Review of recent ACGME data indicate that PU have more overall experience with ERS, with most gained during residency. Additionally, PUfel performed significantly more ERS than PSfel. Further study into how these training differences affect long-term outcomes is necessary.

Fellowship and Subspecialization in Urology: An Analysis of Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a urologic fellowship on physician case-volume and immediate patient outcomes, and to assess predictors of undergoing a robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy by a fellowship-trained (FT) urologist. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all robotic (ICD-9 17.4) partial nephrectomies (PN; ICD-9 55.4) reported in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems (SPARCS) database of New York State (NYS) from 2009 to 2014. Perioperative outcomes assessed included length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, 90-day readmission rates, and complication rates. Pearson chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables, and unpaired Student t tests were used to assess continuous variables. RESULTS: FT urologists performed 2199 (56%) RAPN during the study period, and nonfellowship trained (NFT) urologists completed 1700 (44%) RAPN. FT urologists performed more RAPN in teaching hospitals than NFT urologists (23% vs 7%). The average surgical volume per year for a FT urologist conducting RAPN was 9.6 ± 2.2 cases/y. NFT urologists had an average surgical volume of 7.2 ± 1.5 cases/y (P = <.0001). No significant difference was found in length of stay, 30- or 90-day readmission rate, or complication rate between the groups. RAPN conducted at teaching hospitals were more likely to be conducted by FT urologists. Patients who were self-payers were less likely to have a RAPN by FT urologists. CONCLUSION: There were no differences for RAPN perioperative outcomes between FT urologists and their NFT peers. FT urologists perform a higher case-volume of RAPN in NYS, and this trend is increasing.

Surgical Treatment of 4-10 cm Renal-Cell Carcinoma: A Survey of the Lions and Gazelles.

INTRODUCTION: The decision between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) may be influenced by training, practice type, or location. We sought to evaluate current opinions about the optimal management of 4-10 cm renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was emailed to ∼2500 Endourologic Society and Society of Urologic Oncology members regarding training, practice setting, and interest in clinical trials in addition to questions about four patient scenarios. We evaluated the associations of demographic variables with specific answers. RESULTS: 399 physicians completed the survey with 37% and 34% completing urologic oncology and endourology fellowships, respectively. More respondents reported receiving adequate training in complex open PN compared with complex minimally invasive surgery (MIS) PN, 81% vs 37%. Eighty-three percent of respondents would offer a healthy patient a PN for a 7 cm exophytic mass. Receiving adequate training in complex PN is predictive of offering PN for a central RCC (p = 0.001). Academic practitioners were more likely to offer PN in these patients (p = 0.03). Those completing training after 2000 were more likely to offer MIS (p = 0.02), and respondents who completed an oncology fellowship were more likely to offer PN to unhealthy patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Opinions about the best treatment for 4-10 cm RCC differ significantly, with 70% of respondents willing to enroll patients in a randomized clinical trial. Effective efforts in teaching PN and minimally-invasive surgery result in practices that favor these approaches.

Does teaching of robotic partial nephrectomy affect renal function and perioperative outcomes?

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents the treatment of choice for localized renal tumor<7cm. Minimally invasive approaches are considered standard of care in many institutions. Maintaining acceptable warm ischemic time (WIT) while teaching robotic PN (RPN) remains challenging. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of teaching RPN on WIT and renal function in patients undergoing RPN. METHODS: Patients undergoing RPN for cT1-T2 renal tumors were included. RENAL nephrometry score was used to adjust for tumor complexity. Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were determined preoperatively, at day 2 and at ≥3-month follow-up. Patients in whom the attending surgeon (staff) performed tumorectomy and renorraphy were compared with those in whom the fellow performed these steps. Primary outcomes were WIT and GFR decrease at follow-up visit. Morbidity and margin positivity represented secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 69 patients (46 "staff" vs. 23 "fellow") were included. Patient׳s characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In particular, RENAL score and preoperative GFR were similar between both groups. Mean WIT was 22±9 in the staff and 24±7 in the fellow group (P = 0.09). At follow-up, a GFR reduction of 9% was observed in the staff group vs. 13% in the fellow group (P = 0.38). Complication rates (13% vs. 17%, P = 0.63) and positive margins (9% vs. 4%, P = 0.47) did not differ significantly between staff and fellow. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, teaching RPN with a strict supervision and stepwise standardized procedure was oncologically and functionally safe after 3 to 6 months of follow-up.

Robotic partial nephrectomy - Evaluation of the impact of case mix on the procedural learning curve.

INTRODUCTION: Although Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is an emerging technique for the management of small renal masses, this approach is technically demanding. To date, there is limited data on the nature and progression of the learning curve in RPN. AIMS: To analyse the impact of case mix on the RPN LC and to model the learning curve. METHODS: The records of the first 100 RPN performed, were analysed at our institution that were carried out by a single surgeon (B.C) (June 2010-December 2013). Cases were split based on their Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score into the following groups: 6-7, 8-9 and >10. Using a split group (20 patients in each group) and incremental analysis, the mean, the curve of best fit and R(2) values were calculated for each group. RESULTS: Of 100 patients (F:28, M:72), the mean age was 56.4 ± 11.9 years. The number of patients in each PADUA score groups: 6-7, 8-9 and >10 were 61, 32 and 7 respectively. An increase in incidence of more complex cases throughout the cohort was evident within the 8-9 group (2010: 1 case, 2013: 16 cases). The learning process did not significantly affect the proxies used to assess surgical proficiency in this study (operative time and warm ischaemia time). CONCLUSIONS: Case difficulty is an important parameter that should be considered when evaluating procedural learning curves. There is not one well fitting model that can be used to model the learning curve. With increasing experience, clinicians tend to operate on more difficult cases.

Crowdsourcing Assessment of Surgeon Dissection of Renal Artery and Vein During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Novel Approach for Quantitative Assessment of Surgical Performance.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to describe a methodology of crowdsourcing for obtaining quantitative performance ratings of surgeons performing renal artery and vein dissection of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). We sought to compare assessment of technical performance obtained from the crowdsourcers with that of surgical content experts (CE). Our hypothesis is that the crowd can score performances of renal hilar dissection comparably to surgical CE using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). METHODS: A group of resident and attending robotic surgeons submitted a total of 14 video clips of RPN during hilar dissection. These videos were rated by both crowd and CE for technical skills performance using GEARS. A minimum of 3 CE and 30 Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdworkers evaluated each video with the GEARS scale. RESULTS: Within 13 days, we received ratings of all videos from all CE, and within 11.5 hours, we received 548 GEARS ratings from crowdworkers. Even though CE were exposed to a training module, internal consistency across videos of CE GEARS ratings remained low (ICC = 0.38). Despite this, we found that crowdworker GEARS ratings of videos were highly correlated with CE ratings at both the video level (R = 0.82, p < 0.001) and surgeon level (R = 0.84, p < 0.001). Similarly, crowdworker ratings of the renal artery dissection were highly correlated with expert assessments (R = 0.83, p < 0.001) for the unique surgery-specific assessment question. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that crowdsourced assessment of qualitative performance ratings may be an alternative and/or adjunct to surgical experts' ratings and would provide a rapid scalable solution to triage technical skills.

Impact of fellowship training on robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: benchmarking perioperative safety and outcomes.

To provide perioperative benchmark data for surgeons entering practice from formal robotic training and performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Perioperative outcomes of the first 100 RAPN from a surgeon entering into practice directly from robotic fellowship training were analyzed. Postoperative complications were categorized by Clavien-Dindo grade. Surgical "trifecta scores" and Margin, Ischemia, and Complication (MIC) scoring were utilized to assess surgical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina). Median age of the cohort was 63 years (22-81 years), and 34 (34.3%) patients were over age 65. Forty-one (41.4%) patients had a BMI > 30. Thirteen (13.1%) had RENAL 10-12 tumors, 22 of which (22.2%) were >4 cm in size. Median warm ischemia time was 17 min, and 13 patients had resection without warm ischemia. Five patients were converted to open partial nephrectomy, and 1 patient was converted to laparoscopic nephrectomy. Twenty-one patients (21.2%) experienced a complication, 6 of whom had a major (Clavien grade 3 or higher) complication with one grade 5 complication. Operating room time decreased with experience, but surgical complications and hospital stay did not change with experience. MIC score of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients was 74.7%, while the surgical trifecta was reached in 71.3 % of RCC patients. Surgeons may enter practice directly from formal robotic training and perform RAPN with perioperative outcomes, surgical complications, surgical trifecta scores, and MIC scoring in line with those the most experienced robotic partial nephrectomists.

Laparoscopic kidney donation - giving in the best way possible.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the preferred method of living kidney donation at most transplant centres. There are various techniques, all with their own reported benefits. This editorial gives a brief overview of the various methods in the context of ensuring maximum safety and benefit to the donor without compromising kidney transplant outcomes.

A manpower calculus: the implications of SUO fellowship expansion on oncologic surgeon case volumes.

INTRODUCTION: Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)-accredited fellowship programs have undergone substantial expansion. This study developed a mathematical model to estimate future changes in urologic oncologic surgeon (UOS) manpower and analyzed the effect of those changes on per-UOS case volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SUO fellowship program directors were queried as to the number of positions available on an annual basis. Current US UOS manpower was estimated from the SUO membership list. Future manpower was estimated on an annual basis by linear senescence of existing manpower combined with linear growth of newly trained surgeons. Case-volume estimates for the 4 surgical disease sites (prostate, kidney/renal pelvis, bladder, and testes) were obtained from the literature. The future number of major cases was determined from current volumes based upon the US population growth rates and the historic average annual change in disease incidence. Two models were used to predict future per-UOS major case volumes. Model 1 assumed the current distribution of cases between nononcologic surgeons and UOS would continue. Model 2 assumed a progressive redistribution of cases over time such that in 2043 100% of major urologic cancer cases would be performed by UOSs. RESULTS: Over the 30-year period to "manpower steady-state" SUO-accredited UOSs practicing in the United States have the potential to increase from approximately 600 currently to 1,650 in 2043. During this interval, case volumes are predicted to change 0.97-, 2.4-, 1.1-, and 1.5-fold for prostatectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. The ratio of future to current total annual case volumes is predicted to be 0.47 and 0.9 for models 1 and 2, respectively. The number of annual US practicing graduates necessary to achieve a future to current case-volume ratio greater than 1 is 25 and 49 in models 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current number of SUO fellowship trainees has the potential to decrease future per-UOS case volumes relative to current levels. Redistribution of existing case volume or a decrease in the annual number of trainees or both would be required to insure sufficient surgical volumes for skill maintenance and optimal patient outcomes.

Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate three standardized robotic surgery training methods, inanimate, virtual reality and in vivo, for their construct validity. To explore the concept of cross-method validity, where the relative performance of each method is compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Robotic surgical skills were prospectively assessed in 49 participating surgeons who were classified as follows: 'novice/trainee': urology residents, previous experience <30 cases (n = 38) and 'experts': faculty surgeons, previous experience ≥30 cases (n = 11). Three standardized, validated training methods were used: (i) structured inanimate tasks; (ii) virtual reality exercises on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA); and (iii) a standardized robotic surgical task in a live porcine model with performance graded by the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) tool. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate performance differences between novices and experts (construct validity). Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to measure the association of performance across inanimate, simulation and in vivo methods (cross-method validity). RESULTS: Novice and expert surgeons had previously performed a median (range) of 0 (0-20) and 300 (30-2000) robotic cases, respectively (P < 0.001). Construct validity: experts consistently outperformed residents with all three methods (P < 0.001). Cross-method validity: overall performance of inanimate tasks significantly correlated with virtual reality robotic performance (ρ = -0.7, P < 0.001) and in vivo robotic performance based on GEARS (ρ = -0.8, P < 0.0001). Virtual reality performance and in vivo tissue performance were also found to be strongly correlated (ρ = 0.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We propose the novel concept of cross-method validity, which may provide a method of evaluating the relative value of various forms of skills education and assessment. We externally confirmed the construct validity of each featured training tool.

A qualitative assessment of human cadavers embalmed by Thiel's method used in laparoscopic training for renal resection.

Human cadaveric tissue is the fundamental substrate for basic anatomic and surgical skills training. A qualitative assessment of the use of human cadavers preserved by Thiel's method for a British Association of Urological Surgeons-approved, advanced laparoscopic renal resection skills training course is described in the present study. Four trainees and four experienced laparoscopic surgeons participated in the course. All participants completed a five-point Likert scale satisfaction questionnaire after their training sessions. The quality of cadaveric tissue and the training session were assessed with particular emphasis placed on the ease of patient positioning, the ease of trocar placement, the preservation of tissue planes, the ease of renal pedicle dissection, and the quality of tissue preservation. All of the participants highly rated the quality of the cadaveric tissue embalmed by Thiel's method (mean scores for quality on the five-point Likert scale were 4.5 and 4.3 by the trainees and experienced laparoscopic surgeons, respectively). All of the steps of laparoscopic renal resection were rated 4.0 or more on the Likert scale by both trainees and faculty members. The initial response rates for using a human cadaver embalmed by Thiel's method as a training tool for laparoscopic nephrectomy showed encouraging results. The performance of a laparoscopic nephrectomy on a human cadaver embalmed by Thiel's method bears close resemblance to real laparoscopic nephrectomy procedures, and thus demonstrates added advantages to the previously reported models.

An objective scoring system for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The current first-line recommended modality for nephrectomy is by the laparoscopic approach. This is one of the most frequent laparoscopic interventions conducted in urology. From a skills acquisition and delivery perspective in minimally invasive urologic surgery, there is a paucity of objective scoring systems for advanced laparoscopic urologic procedures. We developed a system of direct observation with structured criteria to evaluate the surgical conduction of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). We tested the application and preliminary validity of the scoring system. METHODS: Sixty cases of prerecorded LN performed in four teaching hospitals were each analyzed by four mentors. Each mentor scored each case based on a 100-point scoring systemthat comprised 20 key steps for LN (each step ranging 0 to 5). Steps included port placement and safety checks in addition to the actual case. In addition, a negative marking system based on a 50-point index scoring system was deployed such that technically unsound techniques were penalized. The sum of the two resulted in the final score. The final scores independently submitted for each recorded case were analyzed and compared. The system was then used to predict the experience of a surgeon for 10 pilot cases. The cases included a mix of five fellows and five experienced laparoscopic urologic surgeons. The cases were blinded to the independent assessors. A further 20 cases involving 10 cases performed by a trainee who sufficiently completed training (as deemed by the recent award of a certificate of specialist training in urology) vs one who is not ready were reviewed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the scores submitted by each of the four mentors for each of the cases observed. There was a strong correlation between overall score and seniority/experience of the performing surgeon of each case; ie, it was able to predict whether an experienced surgeon or laparoscopic fellow performed the case. It was able to predict accurately between a trainee who sufficiently completed training vs one who is "not ready." CONCLUSION: The scoring system was a reliable tool for assessing the performance of LN and accurately predicts the level of experience of the surgeon. This system could be a useful supplementary tool for assessing the baseline skill and progress of trainees.

Impact of a laparoscopic renal surgery mini-fellowship program on postgraduate urologist practice patterns at 3-year followup.

PURPOSE: To assist practicing urologists incorporate laparoscopic renal surgery into their practice we established a 5-day mini-fellowship program with a mentor, preceptor and a potential proctor at our institution. We report the impact of our mini-fellowship program at 3-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 urologists underwent laparoscopic ablative (44) or laparoscopic reconstructive (62) renal surgery training. The 1:2 teacher-to-attendee experience included tutorial sessions, hands-on inanimate and animate skills training, and clinical case observations. Participants were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire on laparoscopic practice patterns 1, 2 and 3 years after the mini-fellowship. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate at 1 to 3 years was 77%, 65% and 68%, respectively. Of responders 72%, 71% and 71% performed laparoscopic renal surgery at 1 to 3 years, respectively. Of the 106 participants 32 (39%) had previous laparoscopic experience, including 78% who responded to the questionnaire at 3 years. Of those surgeons there was an increase in the practice of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (88% vs 72%), nephroureterectomy (56% vs 13%), pyeloplasty (40% vs 6%) and partial nephrectomy (32% vs 6%) at 3 years. Of the 106 participants 74 (70%) were laparoscopy naïve, including 48 (65%) who responded to the questionnaire at 3 years. The take rate in this group was 76%, 52%, 34% and 23% for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, pyeloplasty and partial nephrectomy, respectively. Of the participants 90% indicated that they would recommend this training to a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive 5-day laparoscopic ablative and reconstructive renal surgery course enabled postgraduate urologists to effectively introduce and expand the volume and breadth of their laparoscopic renal surgery practice.

Evaluation of the porcine model to teach various ancillary procedures to gynecologic oncology fellows.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to subjectively evaluate the adequacy of the porcine model for training gynecologic oncology fellows. STUDY DESIGN: Following a defined surgical curriculum, fellow-attending pairs operated on female hogs. A predetermined dataset was collected for each procedure. RESULTS: Twenty pigs were operated on. The porcine model was determined to be a good model for laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (11), ureteroneocystostomy (7), repair of vascular injury (11), bowel anastamoses (21), distal pancreatectomy (5), nephrectomy (6), partial hepatectomy (5), diaphram stripping (5), and diaphragmatic resection (4). Two attendings and 1 fellow judged the porcine model to be fair (remaining 11 good) for ileocolonic urinary diversion, mainly due to significant differences in anatomy. Liver mobilization (5) and splenectomy (11) were determined to be fair or poor models by all participants due to the limited attachments in the pig. CONCLUSION: The porcine model is adequate for teaching some ancillary gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and is inadequate for others.