Longitudinal assessment of urinary ALCAM, HPX, and PRDX6 in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for disease activity monitoring and treatment response.

Introduction: This study aimed to demonstrate the potential of activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), hemopexin (HPX), and peroxiredoxin 6 (PRDX6) as urine biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Urine samples were collected from 138 Korean patients with SLE from the Ajou Lupus Cohort and 39 healthy controls (HC). The concentrations of urine biomarkers were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits specific for ALCAM, HPX, and PRDX6, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic utility, and Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationships between the disease activity and urine biomarkers. Results: Patients with SLE and patients with lupus nephritis (LN) showed significantly elevated ALCAM, HPX, and PRDX6 levels compared with HCs. ALCAM, HPX, and PRDX6 showed significant diagnostic values, especially for lupus nephritis (LN), with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for LN was 0.850 for ALCAM (95% CI, 0.778-0.921), 0.781 for HPX (95% CI, 0.695-0.867), and 0.714 for PRDX6 (95% CI, 0.617-0.812). Correlation analysis revealed that all proteins were significantly associated with anti-double stranded DNA antibody (ALCAM, r = 0.350, p < 0.001; HPX, r = 0.346, p < 0.001; PRDX6, r = 0.191, p = 0.026) and SLEDAI (ALCAM, r = 0.526, p < 0.001; HPX, r = 0.479, p < 0.001; PRDX6, r = 0.262, p = 0.002). Results from the follow-up of the three biomarker levels in these patients revealed a significant decrease, showing a positive correlation with changes in SLEDAI-2k scores (ALCAM, r = 0.502, p < 0.001; HPX, r = 0.475, p < 0.001; PRDX6, r = 0.245, p = 0.026), indicating their potential as indicators for tracking disease activity. Discussions: Urinary ALCAM, HPX, and PRDX6 levels have diagnostic value and reflect disease activity in Korean patients with SLE, emphasizing their potential for non-invasive monitoring and treatment response evaluation.

Assessment of Interleukin 17 in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients as a Biomarker in Disease Activity.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic idiopathic systemic autoimmune disorder with dysregulation of adaptive and innate immune systems. Interleukin (IL)-17 is the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine of T helper 17 (Th17) cells. Therefore, it contributes to the pathogenesis of human SLE. AIM: The aim of the research paper was the evaluation of IL-17 level as a biomarker in the SLE cohort and its relation to disease activity and analysis of IL-17 concentration in patients with lupus nephritis and non-lupus nephritis. METHODS: The research enrolled 45 SLE patients according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria (SLICC), and age and sex-matched. The patients underwent full history, clinical examination, laboratory investigation, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) calculation. RESULTS: The mean age ± SD of the participants equaled 32 ± 11 years, and serum IL-17 in SLE cases was statistically significantly high (p < 0.001). No statistically significant correlations were reported between disease activity according to SLEDAI and IL-17. In addition, a statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and ESR, and a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4 (P < 0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins with a Pvalue of 0.01. CONCLUSION: SLE cases demonstrated higher levels of serum IL-17, contributing to SLE pathogenesis. However, no statistically significant difference was reported between IL-17 and Lupus nephritis. IL-17 and SLE activity (SLEDAI) did not correlate. A statistically significant positive relation was reported between IL-17 and 24-hour urinary proteins. Additionally, a high statistically significant negative correlation was reported between IL-17 and C3 and C4.

Assessment of the Role of Urinary Heparanase in Lupus Nephritis Patients and Its Correlation with Disease Activity.

Assessing the activity of lupus nephritis (LN) with novel biomarkers is a promising noninvasive diagnostic tool for managing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We assessed the ability of urinary heparanase to identify LN and its relation to the disease's activity. This crosssectional study had 90 subjects: 70 patients with SLE and 20 healthy controls. A full medical history, clinical examination, and routine investigations were carried out for the patients and controls. Immunological assays and assessments of the disease's activity with the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the renal SLEDAI (r-SLEDAI) were carried out for LN groups. Urinary heparanase levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for all subjects. Of our patients, 20 had active LN, 17 had nonactive LN, 18 had active lupus without renal involvement, and 15 had nonactive lupus without renal involvement. The level of urinary heparanase was significantly higher in the LN groups than in the non-LN groups and the controls and was significantly higher in those with active LN than in those with nonactive LN. There were significant positive correlations between urinary heparanase and 24-h urinary protein, total SLEDAI, and r-SLEDAI, and significant negative correlations between urinary heparanase and Complements 3 and 4. Urinary heparanase predicted the activity of LN with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 91.43%. Urinary heparanase levels were higher in patients with active LN and correlated with the markers of disease activity, indicating that it can serve as a useful new biomarker for the activity of LN.

Differences in rituximab use between pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and renal flare in childhood-onset SLE.

BACKGROUND: Consensus treatment plans have been developed for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. However, patients who do not respond to initial therapy, or who develop renal flare after remission, warrant escalation of treatment. Our objective was to assess current practices of pediatric nephrologists and rheumatologists in North America in treatment of refractory proliferative LN and flare. METHODS: Members of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the American Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) were surveyed in November 2015 to assess therapy choices (other than modifying steroid dosing) and level of agreement between rheumatologists and nephrologists for proliferative LN patients. Two cases were presented: (1) refractory disease after induction treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) and (2) nephritis flare after initial response to treatment. Survey respondents chose treatments for three follow up scenarios for each case that varied by severity of presentation. Treatment options included CYC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and others, alone or in combination. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents from ASPN and foty-one respondents from CARRA represented approximately 15 % of the eligible members from each organization. Treatment choices between nephrologists and rheumatologists were highly variable and received greater than 50 % agreement for an individual treatment choice in only the following 2 of 6 follow up scenarios: 59 % of nephrologists, but only 38 % of rheumatologists, chose increasing dose of MMF in the case of LN refractory to induction therapy with proteinuria, hematuria, and improved serum creatinine. In a follow up scenario showing severe renal flare after achieving remission with induction therapy, 58 % of rheumatologists chose CYC and RTX combination therapy, whereas the top choice for nephrologists (43 %) was CYC alone. Rheumatologists in comparison to nephrologists chose more therapy options that contained RTX in all follow up scenarios except one (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy choices for pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in the treatment of refractory LN or LN flare were highly variable with rheumatologists more often choosing rituximab. Further investigation is necessary to delineate the reasons behind this finding. This study highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in developing consensus treatment plans for pediatric LN.

A Markov Multi-State model of lupus nephritis urine biomarker panel dynamics in children: Predicting changes in disease activity.

BACKGROUND: A urine 'biomarker panel' comprising alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein, ceruloplasmin, transferrin and lipocalin-like-prostaglandin-D synthase performs to an 'excellent' level for lupus nephritis identification in children cross-sectionally. The aim of this study was to assess if this biomarker panel predicts lupus nephritis flare/remission longitudinally. METHODS: The novel urinary biomarker panel was quantified by enzyme linked immunoabsorbant assay in participants of the United Kingdom Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (UK JSLE) Cohort Study, the Einstein Lupus Cohort, and the South African Paediatric Lupus Cohort. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were also quantified in view of evidence from other longitudinal studies. Serial urine samples were collected during routine care with detailed clinical and demographic data. A Markov Multi-State model of state transitions was fitted, with predictive clinical/biomarker factors assessed by a corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) score (the better the model, the lower the AICc score). RESULTS: The study included 184 longitudinal observations from 80 patients. The homogeneous multi-state Markov model of lupus nephritis activity AICc score was 147.85. Alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein and ceruloplasmin were identified to be the best predictive factors, reducing the AICc score to 139.81 and 141.40 respectively. Ceruloplasmin was associated with the active-to-inactive transition (hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence interval [0.39, 0.93])), and alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein with the inactive-to-active transition (hazard ratio 1.49 (95% confidence interval [1.10, 2.02])). Inputting individual alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein/ceruloplasmin values provides 3, 6 and 12 months probabilities of state transition. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein was predictive of active lupus nephritis flare, whereas ceruloplasmin was predictive of remission. The Markov state-space model warrants testing in a prospective clinical trial of lupus nephritis biomarker led monitoring.

Assessment of urinary TWEAK levels in Mexican patients with untreated lupus nephritis: An exploratory study.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary levels of TWEAK (uTWEAK) may be correlated with the degree of lupus nephritis (LN) activity. Our objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of uTWEAK in Mexican patients with untreated active lupus nephritis. METHODS: An exploratory study was performed; four groups of patients were analyzed as follows: 1) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without renal activity (SLE-LN), 2) patients with SLE with renal activity (SLE+LN), 3) patients with other types of glomerulopathy (glomerulonephritis, GMN), 4) and healthy patients (controls). RESULTS: In all, 44 patients, with an average age of 35.9±11.5 years, were evaluated. uTWEAK levels were higher in patients with SLE+LN compared with patients in the other groups: SLE+LN 12.88±8.33, SLE-LN 3.12±2.31, GMN 4.36±2.31 and controls 2.41±1.94pg/mg Cr (p=0.007). A total of 72.7% of the cases had renal activity index scores above 12, and 90.9% of the cases had scores of chronicity below 6 points. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that uTWEAK levels above 4.91pg/mg Cr had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 75% for the diagnosis of renal activity due to lupus, with an area under the curve of 0.876 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99). However, no significant correlation was observed between the levels of uTWEAK and the histological findings specific to the activity and chronicity associated with SLE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that uTWEAK can adequately distinguish renal activity due to lupus, but cannot predict the degree of histological activity in Mexican patients with active lupus nephropathy.

Longitudinal assessment of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in lupus nephritis as a biomarker of disease activity.

Urinary MCP-1 (uMCP-1) levels reflect lupus nephritis (LN) disease activity. However, long-term prospective studies evaluating it as a biomarker are lacking. SLE patients with active nephritis (AN), active disease without nephritis (ANR), and inactive disease (ID) were enrolled. AN patients were followed up every 3 months for 1 year. Urine and serum samples were collected at baseline from all and at follow-up visits in AN group. Urine samples from healthy subjects (HC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and diabetic nephropathy (DM) patients (20 each) served as controls. Serum (sMCP-1) and uMCP-1 was measured using ELISA. Urinary values were normalized for creatinine excretion. Nonparametric tests were used. A total of 121 SLE patients were enrolled. Baseline uMCP-1 was significantly higher in AN as compared to ANR, ID, HC, and RA (p < 0.001), but it was not different from DM and showed good correlation with rSLEDAI and SLEDAI (r = 0.52 and 0.47, p < 0.001) but not with sMCP-1. On ROC analysis to differentiate between AN and ANR, uMCP-1 performed better than sMCP-1, anti-dsDNA antibodies, C3 and C4. uMCP-1 and not sMCP-1 decreased significantly at all follow-up visits (p < 0.001). uMCP-1 remained persistently elevated in a patient who developed CKD and rose before conventional markers in two patients with relapse of LN. uMCP-1 correlates well with LN disease activity and helps differentiate between AN and ANR patients. Its levels fall with treatment and may have a potential to predict poor response and relapse of LN. uMCP-1 is most likely generated locally in the kidney.

Is there a role for urinary podocyte excretion assessment in lupus nephritis?

OBJECTIVE: To establish the occurrence and intensity of podocyturia and its relation to grade of disease activity, as defined by clinical and laboratory criteria. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional study involving 50 patients with lupus nephritis and 29 controls, which had podocyturia levels determined from random urine samples using an immunofluorescence technique. Disease activity was graded by BILAG (renal criteria) and an additional system used in the service (S2). RESULTS: Fifty patients with lupus nephritis (WHO classes III, IV and V), with a median age of 37 years, were evaluated. Of these, 86.5% were female, and 52% were BILAG A. Podocyturia quantification in the lupus nephritis and control groups differed significantly (p = 0.009). This score was higher in relation to classes III, IV and V. The correlation with C3 consumption was stronger (p = 0.011) than with C4. The highest levels were found in the most active groups (A and B of BILAG and S2). Lower podocyturia correlated with a lower dose of prednisone. There was no association with the intensity of proteinuria, hematuria or pyuria, serum creatinine levels, among others. CONCLUSIONS: Podocyturia assessment, which was performed by immunofluorescence in this study, can be used as an indicator of disease activity with the advantage of being a urinary biomarker. The levels proved to be higher in patients with lupus nephritis than in the controls and were particularly higher in class IV.

Renal function assessment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Few studies have evaluated the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Even though the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) suggests using the equations to estimate GFR, rheumatologists continue using creatinine clearance (CCl). The main objective of our study was the assessment of different equations to estimate GFR in patients with SLE: Simplified MDRD study equation (sMDRD), CCl, Cockcroft Gault (CG), CG calculated with ideal weight (CGi), Mayo Clinic Quadratic (MCQ), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation (CKD-EPI). CKD-EPI was considered as the reference standard, and it was compared with the other equations to evaluate bias, correlation (r), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), percentage of measurement of GFR between 70-130% of GFR measured through CKD-EPI (P30) and to compute the ROC curves. Adequacy of the 24-h urine collection was evaluated. To classify patients into GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the best sensitivity and NVP were obtained with sMDRD: the best PPV and specificity with MCQ. P30 was 99.3% with sMDRD, 77.5% CCl, 91.7% CG, 96.7% CGi, and 77.2% with MCQ. The lowest bias was for sMDRD and the highest for CCl. Only 159 (52.6%) urine collections were considered adequate, and when these patients were re-evaluated, the statistical results improved for CCl. CGi was better in general than CG. CCl should not be considered as an adequate GFR estimation. Ideal weight is better than real weight to calculate GFR through CG in patients with SLE.

Urinary podocytes for the assessment of disease activity in lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: Detection of podocytes in the urine indicates that severe injury of podocytes occurred in the glomerulus in children. METHODS: The pathological significance of podocytes in the urine was determined in patients with lupus nephritis. Podocytes were detected by immunofluorescence using a monoclonal antibody against podocalyxin present on the surface of podocytes. Subjects who participated in the present study were of the following types: patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with stable renal function (group A, n = 8; WHO classes IlIa, b, IVb, and IVc at the time of biopsy); patients with clinically active lupus nephritis (group B, n = 8; WHO classes IVb and IVc); and healthy control subjects (group C, n = 10). RESULTS: Podocytes were absent in the urine of subjects in groups A and C. However, podocytes were present in the urine of group B subjects. Patients in group B were examined monthly for urinary podocytes and were treated with methylprednisolone followed by prednisolone. Urinary podocytes were absent in all patients in group B after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that urinary podocytes may be markers of the severity of lupus nephritis and that steroid therapy may be effective for podocyte injury in lupus nephritis.

Comparative value of urinalysis, urine cytology and urine sIL2R in the assessment of renal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Serial immunological testing has been recently proposed for monitoring patients with lupus nephritis as routine serological tests have shown sub-optimal correlation with clinical status. To assess the value of urine cytology and urine sIL2R in the evaluation of patients with SLE, in particular those with lupus nephritis, we conducted a prospective double-blind study of 31 patients with SLE, during an 18-month period. A comparison of routine urinalysis with urine cytology and urine sIL2R was performed in 84 samples: 15 from patients without a history of renal involvement and 69 from patients with a history of renal involvement. A high urine cytology score (> or = 6), particularly in the presence of lymphoblasts, plasma cells or monocytes, was significantly associated with lupus nephritis in relapse. Urine sIL2R levels were significantly elevated during all SLE relapses, unrelated to the presence of renal involvement. Fifteen urine specimens were obtained at the time of a kidney biopsy: 9 with active lesions and 6 with inactive renal disease. UC score was 2.0 +/- 1.89 for those with absent activity, 8.4 +/- 3.4 for mild activity and 11.0 +/- 2.4 for moderate/severe activity (p < 0.001 between active vs inactive disease). No urinalysis parameter alone permitted distinguishing the degree of renal disease activity. In the subgroup of patients with renal disease urinalysis was overall less accurate than urine cytology or urinary sIL2R levels for predicting renal disease activity defined by biopsy. Urine cytology and urine sIL2R proved to be reliable measures of lupus activity.

Assessment of lupus nephritis activity using urinary retinol-binding protein.

We evaluated the presence of proximal renal tubular dysfunction as measured by urinary retinol-binding protein (RBP) in 70 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal disease activity was assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. This is a clinical-laboratory score based on the principle of the physician's intention to treat. Increased urinary RBP (> 400 micrograms/l) was detected in 17 of 22 (77%) patients with active nephritis, six of 18 (33%) patients with probably active nephritis, one of nine (12%) cases with stable renal disease, and one of 21 (5%) cases without apparent renal disease (P < 0.01). Compared to initial values, mean urinary RBP decreased significantly in six patients evaluated after improvement of the exacerbation of renal disease. There was a positive correlation between urinary RBP and 24-h proteinuria (r = 0.40, P < 0.01), and an inverse correlation between urinary RBP and creatinine clearance (r = -0.60, P < 0.01). In a multivariate analysis adjusting for duration of disease, blood pressure, 24-h proteinuria, and creatinine clearance, mean urinary RBP continued to be significantly and progressively greater for patients with no renal disease, stable renal disease, probably active and active nephritis. Proximal tubular dysfunction is frequent in patients with active lupus nephritis. This association cannot be completely explained by the effects of increased total proteinuria, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and systemic hypertension. Urinary RBP seems to be a marker of renal disease activity. This test may be clinically useful to differentiate patients with active lupus nephritis from those with stable or absent renal disease.