Comparison of endoscopic versus CT assessment of stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

This study is aimed to determine whether postoperative low dose computed tomography (LDCT) imaging is necessary after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of residual fragments (RF) is sufficient and avoidance of postoperative imaging with reduction of radiation exposure can be achieved. Data of all 610 patients who underwent PCNL in prone position in our institution from February 2009 to September 2020 was collected. Parameters such as age, gender, BMI, ASA-Classification, stone related parameters and the surgeon's assessment of stone-free status were analyzed. The LDCT performed postoperatively was compared to the intraoperative assessment of the surgeon regarding RF. The mean age of patients was 52.82 years; the mean BMI was 28.18 kg/m2. In 418 cases, the surgeon made a clear statement about the presence of RF and postoperative LDCT was carried out. The discrepancy between the two methods (surgeon´s assessment vs. LDCT) was significant at p < 0.0001. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the surgeon when assessing RF were 24.05%, 99.45%, 98.28% and 50%. Stone free rate (SFR) after primary PCNL was 45.57%. The overall SFR at discharge was 96.23%. Although the surgeon´s assessment of RF was reliable, postoperative LDCT imaging should still be performed if endoscopic stone clearance is suspected due to the high false negative rate and the low negative predictive value. The optimal timing of postoperative imaging following PCNL remains unclear.

Outcomes and Costs Following Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for 1-2-cm Renal Stones: Data From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the outcomes of ureteroscopy vs prone mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2-cm renal stones using a 2-group parallel randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients presenting with renal stones between 1 and 2 cm were randomized. Exclusion criteria included solitary kidney, multiple stones, and comorbidities precluding prone positioning. Block randomization was performed and was opened to the surgeon the morning of the procedure. Stone-free rate was evaluated by computed tomography 1-30 days postoperatively. Complications, re-treatment rates, and costs were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 51 mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 50 ureteroscopy patients were included. Baseline demographics were similar. Using a 2-mm cutoff, stone-free rate was higher in the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (76 vs 46%, P = .0023). The residual stone burden was significantly higher in the ureteroscopy group than the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (3.6 vs 1.4 mm, P = .0026). Fluoroscopy time was significantly higher in the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (273 vs 49 seconds, P < .0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications within 30 days, the necessity of a secondary procedure within 30 days, and pre- to postoperative creatinine change (P > .05). Surgical time did not vary significantly (P = .1788). Average length of stay was higher in the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (P < .0001). Both net revenue and direct costs were higher in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures (P < .05), though they offset each other with a nonsignificant operating margin (P = .2541). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial using a 2-mm residual stone burden cutoff, mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy was more likely to render patients stone-free than flexible ureteroscopy. Complications, surgical times, and operating margins did not vary between the approaches.

Infectious Complications, Healthcare Resource Use, and Medical Costs Associated with Delays in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Among Patients with Stone Disease and Ureteral Stent Placement.

Purpose: The relationship between ureteral stent duration before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and infectious complications, admissions, imaging, and medical costs was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent PCNL within 6 months of ureteral stent placement were identified from commercial claims, categorized by time to treatment (0-30, 31-60, and >60 days), and followed 1-month post-PCNL. The effect of delayed treatment on inpatient admissions, infectious complications (pyelonephritis/sepsis), and imaging utilization was evaluated with logistic regression. A generalized linear model evaluated the effect of delayed treatment on medical costs. Results: Among 564 patients with PCNL and meeting the inclusion criteria (mean age 50; 55% female; 45% from South), mean (standard deviation) time to surgery was 48.8 (41.8) days. Less than half (44.3%; n = 250) underwent PCNL within 30 days of ureteral stent placement, 27.0% (n = 152) between 31 and 60 days, and 28.7% (n = 162) >60 days. Time to PCNL was significantly associated with inpatient admissions (>60 vs ≤30 days odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.01, p = 0.0016), infectious complications (>60 vs ≤30 days OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.55-3.81, p = 0.0001), imaging utilization (31-60 vs ≤30 days OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.38, p = 0.0383; >60 vs ≤30 days OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.31-3.06, p = 0.0012), and medical costs (31-60 vs ≤30 days OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.49, p = 0.0048; >60 vs ≤30 days OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.71, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Compared with PCNL within 30 days, patients undergoing PCNL >30 days after ureteral stent placement had increased likelihood of infectious complications, resource use, and medical costs. These results may inform health care resource utilization and PCNL prioritization.

Assessment of single-probe dual-energy lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-probe dual-energy (SPDE) lithotripters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Embase databases until July 2022 for any preclinical or clinical studies, exploring the safety and efficacy of different SPDE lithotripters in patients undergoing PCNL. We performed a meta-analysis to compare stone-free rate, bleeding, or other complications and mean operative time between SPDE lithotripters and other lithotripters (PROSPERO: CRD42021285631). RESULTS: We included 16 studies (six preclinical, seven observational and three randomized with 625 participants) in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Preclinical studies suggest that SPDE lithotripters are safe and effective for the management of renal stones. Among clinical studies, four studies assessed Trilogy with no comparative arm, two compared Trilogy or ShockPulse with a dual-probe dual-energy lithotripter, two compared Trilogy with a laser, one compared ShockPulse with a pneumatic lithotripter, and one directly compared Trilogy with ShockPulse. Comparing SPDE lithotripters to other lithotripters, no significant differences were demonstrated in stone free rate (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.53-2.38, I2 = 0%), postoperative blood transfusion (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.34-5.19, I2 = 0%), embolization (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.02-12.06), operative time (WMD: 2.82 min, 95% CI -7.31-12.95, I2 = 78%) and postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. CONCLUSIONS: SPDE lithotripters represent a promising treatment modality for patients requiring PCNL. Despite the initial encouraging findings of preclinical and isolated clinical studies, it seems that Trilogy or ShockPulse provide similar efficiency compared to older generation devices.

Trends and patterns of initial percutaneous nephrolithotomy and subsequent procedures among commercially-insured US adults with urinary system stone disease: a 10-year population-based study.

PURPOSE: To describe trends and patterns of initial percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and subsequent procedures from 2010 to 2019 among commercially-insured US adults with urinary system stone disease (USSD). METHODS: Retrospective study of administrative data from the IBM® MarketScan® Database. Eligible patients were aged 18-64 years and underwent PCNL between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2019. Measures of interest for analysis of trends and patterns included the setting of initial PCNL (inpatient vs. outpatient), percutaneous access (1 vs. 2-step), and the incidence, time course, and type of subsequent procedures (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [SWL], ureteroscopy [URS], and/or PCNL) performed up-to 3 years after initial PCNL. RESULTS: A total of 8,348 patients met the study eligibility criteria. During the study period, there was a substantial shift in the setting of initial PCNL, from 59.9% being inpatient in 2010 to 85.3% being outpatient by 2019 (P < 0.001). The proportion of 1 vs. 2-step initial PCNL fluctuated over time, with a low of 15.1% in 2016 and a high of 22.0% in 2019 but showed no consistent yearly trend (P = 0.137). The Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of subsequent procedures following initial PCNL was 20% at 30 days, 28% at 90 days, and 50% at 3 years, with slight fluctuations by initial PCNL year. From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of subsequent procedures accounted for by URS increased substantially (from 30.8 to 51.8%), whereas SWL decreased substantially (from 39.5 to 14.7%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2019, PCNL procedures largely shifted to the outpatient setting. Subsequent procedures after initial PCNL were common, with most occurring within 90 days. URS has become the most commonly-used subsequent procedure type.

Comparative outcomes and cost of ambulatory PCNL in select kidney stone patients.

Limited hospital resources and access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic led us to implement a quality-improvement study investigating the feasibility, safety, and costs of same-day discharge after PCNL. The outcomes of 53 consecutive first-look PCNL patients included in a same-day discharge protocol during COVID-19 were compared to 54 first-look PCNL patients admitted for overnight observation. Control group had a similar comorbidity profile. Demographics, operative details, 30 day outcomes and readmissions, complications, and cost were compared between the two groups. Same-day discharge and one-day admission post-PCNL patients did not have significantly different baseline characteristics. The study group were more likely to have mini-PCNL (81% vs 50%, p < 0.01). Operative characteristics including median pre-operative stone burden (1.4 vs 1.7 cm3, p = 0.47) and post-operative stone burden (0.14 vs 0.18 cm3, p = 0.061) were similar between the two groups. Clavien-Dindo complication rates were lower in the study group compared to controls (0 vs 7%, p = 0.045). Readmission rates (2 vs 4%, p = 0.569) and ED visits (4 vs 6%, p = 0.662) were similar between the two groups. Total cost ($6,648.92 vs $9,466.07, p < 0.01) was significantly lower and operating margin ($4,475.96 vs $1,742.16, p < 0.01) was significantly higher for the same-day discharge group. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be performed in select patients without an increase in short-term complications, ED visits, or readmissions. Patients undergoing mini-PCNL are particularly amenable to same-day discharge, however, standard PCNL patients should not be excluded from consideration. Avoiding overnight admission decreases total cost and increased hospital operating margin.

Economic burden of complicated ureteral stent removal in patients with kidney stone disease in the USA.

Aim: To examine the medical costs of simple versus complicated ureteral stent removal. Materials & methods: We included adults with kidney stones undergoing simple or complicated cystoscopy-based stent removal (CBSR) post ureteroscopy from the 2014 to 2018 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database. The medical costs of patients with complicated and simple CBSR were compared. Results: Among 16,682 patients, 2.8% had complicated CBSR. Medical costs for patients with complicated CBSR were higher than for simple CBSR ($2182 [USD] vs $1162; p < 0.0001). Increased stenting time, increased age, southern US geography and encrusted stent diagnoses were significantly associated with complicated CBSR. Conclusion: Complicated ureteral stent removal doubled the medical costs associated with CBSR. Ureteral stents with anti-encrustation qualities may reduce the need for complicated CBSR and associated costs.

An ex-vivo assessment of a new single probe triple modality (Trilogy) lithotripter.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy lithotrite is a new lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). It has four modifiable settings; impact, frequency, ultrasound and suction. We aim to determine the optimal device settings for the fastest stone clearance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney stone phantoms were made with Begostone in a powder to water ratio (15:3-15:6). Complete stone clearance (seconds) was calculated and impact and frequency were adjusted and repeated N = 3. Intra renal pressure (IRP) was then measured in a porcine kidney model. RESULTS: Stone phantoms with physical properties similar to struvite were cleared best with 100% impact and frequency of 12 Hz. Both uric acid stone phantoms and calcium phosphate stone phantoms were cleared most efficiently with an impact of 30% and a frequency of 4 Hz. The mean time to clear uric acid stone phantoms was 83 s versus 217 s for calcium phosphate stone phantoms. Similarly, for calcium oxalate stone phantoms, an impact of 30% and a frequency of 4 Hz was associated with the fastest clearance time, mean 204 s. However, the differences between 4, 8 and 12 Hz were not statistically significant. At a suction level of 60% or higher, IRP became negative. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that stone phantoms of hard kidney stones are cleared more efficiently at lower impact and frequency settings. With regard to suction, a setting of ≤ 50% appears to be the optimal setting.

Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy May Be Cost-Effective Compared to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) changed the practice of medicine in America. During the March 2020 lockdown, elective cases were canceled to conserve hospital beds/resources resulting in financial losses for health systems and delayed surgical care. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPCNL) has been shown to be safe and could be a strategy to ensure patients receive care that has been delayed, conserve hospital resources, and maximize cost-effectiveness. We aimed to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of patients undergoing aPCNL against standard PCNL (sPCNL). Materials and Methods: Ninty-eight patients underwent PCNL at Indiana University Methodist Hospital, a tertiary referral center, by three expert surgeons from January 2020 to September 2020. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the 30-day rates of emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and complications between sPCNL and aPCNL. Secondary outcomes included cost analysis and stone-free rates (SFRs). Propensity score matching was performed to ensure the groups were balanced. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 using independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square analyses for categorical variables. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent PCNL during the study period (sPCNL = 75 and aPCNL = 23). After propensity score matching, 42 patients were available for comparison (sPCNL = 19 and aPCNL = 23). We found no difference in 30-day ED visits, readmissions, or complications between the two groups. aPCNL resulted in cost savings of $5327 ± 442 per case. SFRs were higher for aPCNL compared with sPCNL. Conclusions: aPCNL appears safe to perform and does not have a higher rate of ED visits or readmissions compared with sPCNL. aPCNL may also be cost-effective compared with sPCNL.

Efficacy and Economy of Two-Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Calculi.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and cost effectiveness of two-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in complex renal calculus disease. METHODS: The clinical data of 106 patients who underwent two-stage PCNL at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2017 to May 2022 were analyzed. In order to select more accurate timing and strategies to reduce costs and surgery risk in two-stage PCNL patients, different parameters were measured-including the preoperative urinary tract infection, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, postoperative stone clearance and treatment costs. Patients were divided into group A and group B according to different timings of two-stage PCNL operation. Group A included patients who underwent two-stage PCNL during their period of hospitalization 5 to 9 days after the one-stage PCNL. Group B comprised patients who were re-hospitalized for two-stage PCNL 29 to 35 days after the one-stage PCNL. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the influence of stone diameter and operation time in intraoperative blood loss of PCNL in 106 patients (p < 0.001). Compared with one-stage PCNL, the intraoperative hemoglobin loss and hematocrit loss means of patients with two-stage PCNL were decreased, the stone diameter mean of was smaller, and the mean operative time was diminished (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the hemoglobin loss, hematocrit loss and stone clearance rate means between group A and group B (p > 0.05). The urinary tract infection rate in group A was lower than the one in group B, and the average treatment cost was lower than the one in group B (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative bleeding in PCNL is influenced by stone diameter and operative time. Two-stage PCNL displays smaller calculi, shorter operation time and lower intraoperative blood loss than one-stage PCNL. Patients who had no surgical contraindication could undergo two-stage PCNL during the same hospitalization 5 to 9 days after one-stage PCNL to avoid rehospitalization. This approach could reduce the risk of urinary tract infection of indwelling nephrostomy tube and decrease the economic burden of patients.

Impact of radiation on the incidence and management of ureteroenteric strictures: a contemporary single center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ureteroenteric stricture incidence has been reported as high as 20% after urinary diversion. Many patients have undergone prior radiotherapy for prostate, urothelial, colorectal, or gynecologic malignancy. We sought to evaluate the differences between ureteroenteric stricture occurrence between patients who had radiation prior to urinary diversion and those who did not. METHODS: An IRB-approved cystectomy database was utilized to identify ureteroenteric strictures among 215 patients who underwent urinary diversion at a single academic center between 2016 and 2020. Chart abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of confirmed stricture in these patients, defined as endoscopic diagnosis or definitive imaging findings. Strictures due to malignant ureteral recurrence were excluded (3 patients). Statistical analysis was performed using chi squared test, t-test, and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis of stricture by cancer type. RESULTS: 65 patients had radiation prior to urinary diversion; 150 patients did not have a history of radiation therapy. Benign ureteroenteric stricture rate was 5.3% (8/150) in the non-radiated cohort and 23% (15/65) in the radiated cohort (p = < 0.001). Initial management of stricture was percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) in 78% (18/23) and the remaining 22% (5/23) were managed with primary retrograde ureteral stent placement. Long term management included ureteral reimplantation in 30.4% (7/23). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a significant increase in rate of ureteroenteric strictures in radiated patients as compared to non-radiated patients. The insult of radiation on the ureteral microvascular supply is likely implicated in the cause of these strictures. Further study is needed to optimize surgical approach such as utilization of fluorescence angiography for open and robotic approaches.

Determining Variable Costs in the Acute Urolithiasis Cycle of Care Through Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize full cycle of care costs for managing an acute ureteral stone using time-driven activity-based costing. METHODS: We defined all phases of care for patients presenting with an acute ureteral stone and built an overarching process map. Maps for sub-processes were constructed through interviews with providers and direct observation of clinical spaces. This facilitated calculation of cost per minute for all aspects of care delivery, which were multiplied by associated process times. These were added to consumable costs to determine cost for each specific step and later aggregated to determine total cost for each sub-process. We compared costs of eight common clinical pathways for acute stone management, defining total cycle of care cost as the sum of all sub-processes that comprised each pathway. RESULTS: Cost per sub-process included $920 for emergency department (ED) care, $1665 for operative stent placement, $2368 for percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement, $106 for urology clinic consultation, $238 for preoperative center visit, $4057 for ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (URS), $2923 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, $169 for clinic stent removal, $197 for abdominal x-ray, and $166 for ultrasound. The lowest cost pathway ($1388) was for medical expulsive therapy, whereas the most expensive pathway ($8002) entailed a repeat ED visit prompting temporizing stent placement and interval URS. CONCLUSION: We found a high degree of cost variation between care pathways common to management of acute ureteral stone episodes. Reliable cost accounting data and an understanding of variability in clinical pathway costs can inform value-based care redesign as payors move away from pure fee-for-service reimbursement.

Health Education Intervention for Patients Undergoing Placement of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the economic impact (cost) of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube care in patients following an educational intervention to no intervention. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 178 patients recruited between May 2017 and April 2019. The study setting was the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital located in Cantabria on the northern coast of Spain. Data were collected in the hospital's radiology department. METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to 2 groups: an intervention group received an educational intervention that specifically addressed living with a PCN tube and a control group that received standard instruction. The intervention group received the educational intervention twice, before placement of the nephrostomy and at first tube change (6 weeks later). The main outcome variable was economic impact of the PCN, operationally defined as unscheduled or urgent visits and health care costs related to PCN tube placement. RESULTS: When compared to control group subjects, participants who received the educational intervention had fewer urgent (unscheduled) visits (1.9 vs 4.0; P = .004) and lower direct and indirect health care costs reflecting a savings of €5277 (approximately US $6257). CONCLUSIONS: The health education intervention reduced costs associated with these additional visits when compared to patients receiving standard postprocedural education.

Ureteral Stent Encrustation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Management and Current Technology.

PURPOSE: Encrustation is a common phenomenon that can occur following placement of a ureteral stent into the urinary tract, and it can lead to serious complications. The following review addresses the mechanism of encrustation, the management of these stents and the newest technology developed to mitigate this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search on stent encrustation including peer-reviewed publications, public product listings, and material on current and future stent technology. RESULTS: The mechanism of encrustation is complex and multifaceted, including dwell time, patient specific risk factors, conditioning film formation, biofilm formation and mineral deposition. Several technological developments in stent materials and coatings may have a role in reducing the risk of stent encrustation. It is important to identify the extent of stent encrustation and plan treatment strategies accordingly. We propose a novel treatment algorithm for the management encrusted ureteral stents. CONCLUSIONS: The ubiquity of ureteral stents in urology practice mandates updated knowledge about the prevention of stent encrustation, identification of high risk patients and preparedness for removal using multimodal techniques.

Assessment of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Patients with Nondilated Collecting System.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis. Methods: Patients with nondilated collecting system kidney stones who underwent PCNL between October 2018 and December 2019 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups: a CEUS-guided PCNL group and a conventional ultrasound (US)-guided PCNL group. The operation results of the two groups were compared, including the number of attempts for effective puncture, duration to effective puncture, stone clearance rate, blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Results: Fifty-six patients with a nondilated collecting system who underwent PCNL for 60 kidneys were included in this study, including 4 patients who underwent bilateral PCNL due to bilateral renal stones. There were 30 kidneys in each group. All patients successfully underwent PCNL. The CEUS-guided PCNL group had more accurate punctures, with a higher effective rate of one puncture and shorter puncture time. There was no statistically significant difference in stone clearance rate between the two groups. Four cases of double channels were established in the conventional US-guided PCNL group, while there was only one case in the CEUS-guided PCNL group. In the CEUS-guided PCNL group, most cases (96.7%, 29/30) had no or only mild complications, which were significantly better than the conventional US-guided PCNL group (76.7%, 23/30). The mean postoperative hemoglobin loss in the CEUS-guided PCNL group was 9.5 (range 1-25) g/L, which was significantly lower than 15.5 (range 5-52) g/L in the conventional US-guided PCNL group. Conclusion: The CEUS technique can improve visibility of the nondilated renal collecting system, facilitate selection of suitable calix, and identify renal calix fornix. It also benefits needle placement in patients with a nondilated collecting system.

Initial single centre experiences of a radiographer advanced practitioner led nephrostomy exchange programme.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the technical success, radiation dose, complications and costs from the introduction of a radiographer-led nephrostomy exchange service. METHODS: Post-graduate qualified interventional radiographers with several years' experience in performing other interventional procedures began performing nephrostomy exchanges. Training was provided by an interventional radiologist. Each radiographer performed ten procedures under direct supervision followed by independent practice with remote supervision. Each radiographer was then responsible for the radiological report, discharge, re-referral for further exchange and, where indicated, sending urine samples for culture and sensitivity. Data extraction included the time interval between exchanges, radiation dose/screening time and complications. RESULTS: Thirty-eight long-term nephrostomy patients had their histories interrogated back to the time of the initial insertion. The mean (range) age at nephrostomy insertion was 67 (35-93) years and 65% were male. Indications for nephrostomy were prostatic or gynaecological malignancy, ureteric injury, bulky lymphoma and post-transplant ureteric stricture. A total of 170 nephrostomy exchanges were performed with no statistically significant differences in the radiation dose, fluoroscopy time nor complication rates between consultants and radiographers. There was, however, a statistically significant reduction in the time interval between nephrostomy exchanges for the radiographer group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Interventional radiographers can provide a safe, technically successful nephrostomy exchange program with radiation doses equivalent to radiologists. This is a cost-effective solution to the capacity issues faced in many departments, whilst providing career progression, job satisfaction and possibly improved care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Radiographer-led interventional services should be considered by other institutions as a means of providing effective nephrostomy exchanges.

Initial prospective study of ambulatory mPCNL on upper urinary tract calculi.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and safety of ambulatory mPCNL (mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy) on upper urinary tract calculi. METHODS: Clinical data of 18 patients received ambulatory mPCNL during Aug. 2017 to Jan. 2018 and 23 patients treated with routine inpatient mPCNL of the corresponding period were collected. All the patients included received 16Fr channel PCNL under the guidance of Doppler ultrasound. A 6Fr double J stent was placed in the ureter for internal drainage, and either an indwelling 14Fr open nephrostomy tube was placed or the puncture channel was filled with absorbable hemostatic materials alone, depends on the bleeding condition of the puncture channel and the intraoperative conditions. Preoperative parameters and surgery time, complications, total hospitalization costs and hospital stay time between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Preoperative parameters regarding age (P=0.057), sex distribution (P=0.380), ASA score (P=0.388), Calculi CT value (P=0.697), and the S.T.O.N.E. score (P=0.122) were comparable between the two groups. Maximum diameter of calculi (cm) of the conventional hospitalization group, however, was larger than the ambulatory surgery group (P=0.041). There were no significant differences in the mean surgery time (P=0.146), postoperative hemoglobin drop (P=0.865), Calculi-free rate on the next day after surgery (P=0.083) and postoperative fever rate (P=0.200) between the two groups. With regard to tubeless rate (P<0.001), total hospitalization costs (P=0.003) and hospital stay time (P<0.001), there were significant advantage favored ambulatory mPCNL. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with simple upper urinary tract calculi and relatively good performance status, ambulatory mPCNL is feasible as it's equally safe and efficient as compared with routine inpatient mPCNL. Moreover, ambulatory mPCNL decreases hospitalization costs and hospital stay time. Nevertheless, perioperative management should be carefully conducted, and well-designed studies are warranted.