Laboratory approaches for the diagnosis and assessment of hypercalcemia.

Calcium, the fifth most common element in the body, plays major physiological functions. Measurement of blood calcium is one of the most commonly ordered laboratory tests in assessments of calcium homeostasis and disease diagnosis. Hypercalcemia is an increased level of calcium in the blood. This disorder is most commonly caused by primary hyperparathyroidism and malignancy. However, other less common causes of elevated calcium levels need to be considered when making a differential diagnosis. This review is intended to provide readers with a better understanding of calcium homeostasis and the causes and pathophysiology of hypercalcemia. Most importantly, this review describes useful approaches for laboratory scientists and clinicians to appropriately diagnose and assess hypercalcemia.

Narrowing the gap of personalized medicine in emerging countries: the case of multiple endocrine neoplasias in Brazil.

The finished version of the human genome sequence was completed in 2003, and this event initiated a revolution in medical practice, which is usually referred to as the age of genomic or personalized medicine. Genomic medicine aims to be predictive, personalized, preventive, and also participative (4Ps). It offers a new approach to several pathological conditions, although its impact so far has been more evident in mendelian diseases. This article briefly reviews the potential advantages of this approach, and also some issues that may arise in the attempt to apply the accumulated knowledge from genomic medicine to clinical practice in emerging countries. The advantages of applying genomic medicine into clinical practice are obvious, enabling prediction, prevention, and early diagnosis and treatment of several genetic disorders. However, there are also some issues, such as those related to: (a) the need for approval of a law equivalent to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which was approved in 2008 in the USA; (b) the need for private and public funding for genetics and genomics; (c) the need for development of innovative healthcare systems that may substantially cut costs (e.g. costs of periodic medical followup); (d) the need for new graduate and postgraduate curricula in which genomic medicine is emphasized; and (e) the need to adequately inform the population and possible consumers of genetic testing, with reference to the basic aspects of genomic medicine.

Narrowing the gap of personalized medicine in emerging countries: the case of multiple endocrine neoplasias in Brazil

The finished version of the human genome sequence was completed in 2003, and this event initiated a revolution in medical practice, which is usually referred to as the age of genomic or personalized medicine. Genomic medicine aims to be predictive, personalized, preventive, and also participative (4Ps). It offers a new approach to several pathological conditions, although its impact so far has been more evident in mendelian diseases. This article briefly reviews the potential advantages of this approach, and also some issues that may arise in the attempt to apply the accumulated knowledge from genomic medicine to clinical practice in emerging countries. The advantages of applying genomic medicine into clinical practice are obvious, enabling prediction, prevention, and early diagnosis and treatment of several genetic disorders. However, there are also some issues, such as those related to: (a) the need for approval of a law equivalent to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which was approved in 2008 in the USA; (b) the need for private and public funding for genetics and genomics; (c) the need for development of innovative healthcare systems that may substantially cut costs (e.g. costs of periodic medical followup); (d) the need for new graduate and postgraduate curricula in which genomic medicine is emphasized; and (e) the need to adequately inform the population and possible consumers of genetic testing, with reference to the basic aspects of genomic medicine.

Familial neuroendocrine tumor syndromes: from genetics to clinical practice.

Thanks to recent developments in molecular biology and cancer genetics, genetic testing has become widely available and useful in several kinds of familial tumor syndrome. However, the impact of genetic testing on medical management is not always straightforward. Clinicians have to consider the psychological impact and ethical complexities of communicating hereditary cancer risk information to families. This review notes some points on genetic counseling before and after genetic testing for familial neuroendocrine tumor syndromes.

Genetic testing for cancer predisposition.

Clinical cancer genetics is becoming an integral part of the care of cancer patients. This review describes the clinical aspects, genetics, and clinical genetic management of most of the major hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and familial adenomatous polyposis are examples of syndromes for which genetic testing to identify at-risk family members is considered the standard of care. Genetic testing for these syndromes is sensitive and affordable, and it will change medical management. Cancer genetic counseling and testing is probably beneficial in other syndromes, such as the hereditary breast cancer syndromes, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and juvenile polyposis. There are also hereditary cancer syndromes for which testing is not yet available and/or is unlikely to change medical management, including Li-Fraumeni syndrome and hereditary malignant melanoma. Thorough medical care requires the identification of families likely to have a hereditary cancer susceptibility syndrome for referral to cancer genetics professionals.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type I: assessment of laboratory tests to screen for the gene in a large kindred.

We measured multiple components of serum or plasma in 221 members of a kindred with familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (FMEN1). The kindred showed typical features of FMEN1; the FMEN1 gene could be traced through 7 generations with 74 members identifiable as gene carriers. Between family screening in 1981 and completion of our study in 1985, we identified 16 previously unscreened members as carriers of the FMEN1 gene. The earliest age at diagnosis of FMEN1 was 17. The tests with the greatest yield of abnormal results among carriers of the FMEN1 gene were albumin-adjusted calcium, PTH, gastrin, and (in females) prolactin. The following tests provided little or no use in identifying carriers: prolactin (in males), pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon, glicentin, insulin, growth hormone, motilin, and somatostatin. Primary hyperparathyroidism was the commonest expression of the FMEN1 gene; the gene penetrance for this trait increased from near 0% before age 15 to near 100% after age 40. It appeared prior to development of serious morbidity from hypergastrinemia or hyperprolactinemia. All 42 co-operating members who were alive and expressing the FMEN1 gene in 1984 showed active or treated primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary hypergastrinemia had a prevalence below half of that for primary hyperparathyroidism at all ages and was not diagnosed in the absence of primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary hyperprolactinemia was still less prevalent than primary hypergastrinemia. It was limited almost exclusively to females.