The Role of Routine Pathologic Assessment After Pediatric Osteochondroma Excision.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondromas are benign osseous lesions often excised for pain, growth abnormalities, and aesthetic concerns. While characteristic clinical and radiographic features leave little diagnostic ambiguity in most cases of osteochondroma, pathologic analysis to confirm the diagnosis and screen for malignancy is routinely performed following surgical excision. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and economic value of routine pathologic analysis after osteochondroma excision in a pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical records from 2 pediatric orthopaedic hospitals (St. Louis Children's Hospital and Shriner's Hospital for Children, St. Louis) identified 426 osteochondroma lesions surgically resected from 201 patients. Patients with solitary and multiple lesions were included. Clinical, radiographic, and surgical data were recorded for each resection surgery. Pathologic reports were evaluated. Costs incurred for routine pathologic assessment was also noted. RESULTS: Totally, 132 patients were treated with surgical resection of a solitary osteochondroma lesion, while an additional 291 lesions were resected from 69 patients with multiple lesions. Average age at the time of surgical resection was 13.0 years (2.1 to 17.9). The most common anatomic locations of excised lesions included the distal femur (110, 25.8%), proximal tibia/fibula (95, 22.3%), and distal radius/ulna (58, 13.6%). All resected specimens were sent for pathologic analysis. The average size of the resected lesions was 19.9 mm 3 (0.02 to 385.0 mm 3 ). In all cases, the histologic diagnosis confirmed benign osteochondroma. The total charges of pathologic analysis including processing and interpretation fees was ∼$755.00 for each lesion assessed, for a total cohort charge of $321,630. CONCLUSION: We propose that in most cases of pediatric osteochondroma excision procedures, postoperative histologic analysis is not strictly indicated as it rarely, if ever, alters diagnosis or management. We suggest using a "gross only" analysis in these cases. However, we do believe that with preoperative diagnostic ambiguity, or if patients present with concerning features such as rapidly expansile lesions or cortical destruction, have axial skeleton or pelvic involvement, or enlarged cartilaginous caps, full histologic evaluation of the excised lesions will continue to be prudent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Natural melanin nanoparticles (MNPs) extracted from Sepia officinalis: A cost-effective, chemo-photothermal, synergistic nanoplatform for osteosarcoma treatment.

Osteosarcoma conventional chemotherapeutics are known for their side effects, limited options, and induction of drug resistance. This creates the need to develop new therapeutics capable of effectively destroying cancer cells with low toxicity, improving patient survival rate and their life quality. This work reports a novel drug delivery nanoplataform made of Natural Melanin Nanoparticles (MNPs), obtained from Sepia officinalis ink, with 99% incorporation efficiency of doxorubicin (Dox) without the use of non-toxic solvents. A significant photothermal effect was shown by a 36ºC increment after 10 min of laser irradiation, surpassing reported values for synthetic melanin. A sustained drug release of ca. 23% with photothermal stimuli was observed, compared to 15% without stimuli, after 48 h. This nanoplatform is obtained as a food industry side product, which makes it a natural cost-effective biomedical material. Natural MPs were applied in an osteosarcoma cell line (SaOs-2), and internalized by the cells in less than 2 h, showing cytocompatibility up to 1000 µg/mL after 72 h of contact with cells. On the contrary, when natural MNPs loaded with Dox (Dox-MNPs) were placed in contact with the SaOs-2 cells and were simultaneously receiving NIR light it was observed a 93% reduction in cancer cells in 48 h, revealing a synergistic effect between chemotherapy and phototherapy. To our knowledge this is the first time that natural MNPs extracted from Sepia officinalis were tested on an osteosarcoma cell line as chemo-photothermal agent, showing these NPs are an effective, cost-effective, reproducible, non-toxic nanoplatform for osteosarcoma treatment using combined effects.

Challenges in the Assessment of Medullary Bone Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance.

BACKGROUND: As per AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system, bone invasion is a poor prognostic marker that upstages oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC) to pT4a. Cortical erosion alone of bone or tooth socket by a gingival primary is not sufficient to upstage a tumour. The differentiation of cortical erosion from invasion through the cortical bone into the medulla is often challenging, limiting accurate staging. This review aims to assess the difficulties in differentiating cortical erosion from medullary invasion and evaluate the prognostic significance of different patterns of bone involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review of OSCC with primary curative surgery and bone resection treated at a single-center over 10 years, was performed to assess the prognostic significance of bone invasion. Hematoxylin-eosin stained slides of a subset of cases were re-reviewed in a planned manner to assess difficulties in precise categorization (no invasion/erosion/cortical invasion and medullary invasion), evaluate interobserver agreement, and correlate with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28 months. On univariate analysis, the 3-year local, nodal and distant metastasis control were not significantly different in the 3 groups of no invasion, erosion, and invasion (p = 0.43, 0.47, and 0.47, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 78.1% and disease-free-survival(DFS) was 63.7% in the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, there was significant difference in OS and DFS based on these groups. This did not translate into independent prognostic benefit on multivariable analysis (p = 0.75 and 0.19, respectively). The independent prognostic factors were margin positivity, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion and pathological nodal involvement. Planned re-review of a subset of 202 cases resulted in a change in bone involvement category in 26/202 cases, which was mainly due to difficulty in assessing cortico-medullary junction near the tooth socket and bone fragmentation. The assessment showed moderate to near complete agreement (kappa 0.59-0.82) between 2 observers. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that bone involvement is not an independent prognostic marker and there is no specific correlation of medullary invasion with outcome over those that showed cortical erosion. Several factors contribute to difficulties and interobserver variability in assessing bone involvement.

What is the diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence-guided surgery for margin assessment in appendicular bone and soft tissue tumors? - A systematic review of clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is a novel technique to successfully assess surgical margins intraoperatively. Investigation and adoption of this technique in orthopaedic oncology remains limited. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed for this manuscript. Our study was registered on PROSPERO (380520). Studies describing the use of FGS for resection of bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) on humans were included. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV] and accuracy) and margin positivity rate were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Critical appraisal using the Joanna Brigs Institute checklists showed significant concerns for study quality. Sensitivity of FGS ranged from 22.2 % to 100 % in three of the four studies assessing his metrics; one study in appendicular tumors in the pediatric population reported 0 % sensitivity in the three cases included. Specificity ranged from 9.38 % to 100 %. PPV ranged from 14.6 % to 70 % while NPV was between 53.3 % and 100 %. The diagnostic accuracy ranged from 21.62 % to 92.31 %. Margin positivity rate ranged from 2 % to 50 %, with six of the seven studies reporting values between 20 % and 50 %. CONCLUSIONS: FSG is a feasible technique to assess tumor margins in bone and STS. Reported performance metrics and margin positivity rates vary widely between studies due to low study quality and high heterogeneity in dying protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Disparities in Primary Spinal Osseous Malignant Bone Tumor Survival by Medicaid Status: A National Population-Based Risk Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of Medicaid status on survival outcomes of patients with spinal primary malignant bone tumors (sPMBT) has not been investigated. METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicaid database, adults diagnosed between 2006 and 2013 with sPMBT including chordoma, osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, or malignant giant cell tumor (GCT) were studied. Five-year survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression controlling for age, sex, marital status, cancer stage, poverty level, vertebral versus sacral location, geography, rurality, tumor diameter, tumor grade, tumor histology, and therapy. RESULTS: A total of 572 patients with sPMBT (Medicaid: 59, non-Medicaid: 513) were identified. Medicaid patients were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), Black (P < 0.001), live in high poverty neighborhoods (P = 0.006), have distant metastases at diagnosis (P < 0.001), and less likely to receive surgery (P = 0.006). The 5-year survival rate was 65.7% (chondrosarcoma: 70.0%, chordoma: 91.5%, Ewing sarcoma: 44.6%, GCT: 90.0%, osteosarcoma: 34.2%). Medicaid patients had significantly worse 5-year survival than non-Medicaid patients (52.0% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.02). Minority individuals on Medicaid were associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality compared with White non-Medicaid patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.51, [95% CI 1.18-5.35], P = 0.017). Among Medicaid patients, those who received surgery had significantly better survival than those who did not (64.5% vs. 30.6%, P = 0.001). For all patients, not receiving surgery (aHR = 1.90 [1.23-2.95], P = 0.004) and tumor diameter >50 mm (aHR=1.89 [1.10-3.25], P = 0.023) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients may be less likely to receive surgery and suffer from poorer survival. These disparities may be especially prominent among minorities.

Update on immunohistochemistry in bone and soft tissue tumors: Cost-effectively replacing molecular testing with immunohistochemistry.

Soft tissue tumors form part of a challenging domain in diagnostic pathology owing to their comparative rarity, astonishing histologic diversity, and overlap between entities. Many of these tumors are now known to be defined by highly recurrent, or, in some instances, unique molecular alterations. Insights from gene profiling continue to elucidate the wider molecular landscape of soft tissue tumors; many of these advances have been co-opted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnostic applications. There now exists a multitude of antibodies serving as surrogate markers of recurrent gene fusions, amplifications, and point mutations, which, in certain settings, can replace the need for more resource and time-intensive cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. IHC presents many advantages including rapid turnaround time, cost-effectiveness, and interpretative reproducibility. A sensible application of these immunohistochemical markers complemented by a working knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of bone and soft tissue tumors permits accurate diagnosis in the majority of cases. In this review, we will outline some of these biomarkers while emphasizing molecular correlates and highlighting interpretative challenges and pitfalls.

Imaging Assessment of the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Primary Malignant Bone Tumors: Recent Advances in Qualitative and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiomics.

Recent studies have shown that MRI demonstrates promising results for evaluating the chemotherapy efficacy in bone sarcomas. This article reviews current methods for evaluating the efficacy of malignant bone tumors and the application of MRI in this area, and emphasizes the advantages and limitations of each modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Decision tree-based data mining approach for the evaluation of survival in primary malignant bone tumors: A surveillance, epidemiology and end results database study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to conduct a large-scale population-based study to understand the epidemiological characteristics of Primary Malignant Bone Tumors (PMBTs) and determine the prognostic factors by concurrently using the classical statistical method and data mining methods. METHODS: Patients included in this study were extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database: "Incidence-SEER Research Data, 18 Registries, Nov 2020 Sub". Patients with unclassified and incomplete information were excluded. This search algorithm resulted in a dataset comprising 6234 cases. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis determined the independent prognostic factors of PMBT. A decision tree-based data mining technique was used in this study to confirm the prognostic factors. RESULTS: 5-years survival rate was 63.6% and 10-years survival rate was 55.3% in the patients with PMBT. Sex, age, median household income, histology, primary site, grade, stage, metastasis, and the total number of malignant tumors were determined as independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) in the multivariate COX regression analysis. The prognostic factors resulting in five terminal nodes in the decision tree (DT) included stage, age, and grade. The stage was the most important determining factor for vital status. The terminal node with the shortest number of surviving patients included 801 (72.3%) deaths in 1102 patients with distant stage, and hazard ratio was calculated as 5.4 (95% CI: 4.9-5.9; p < .001). These patients had a median survival of only 17 months. CONCLUSIONS: Rules extracted from DTs provide information about risk factors in specific patient groups and can be used by clinicians making decisions on individual patients. We recommend using DTs in combination with COX regression analysis to determine risk factors and the effect of these factors on survival.

Postoperative Functional Assessment in Patients with Tumors Around the Knee Treated with Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The restoration of as much normal function as possible has become an important goal following the endoprosthetic reconstruction. The objective of this study was to assess the functional outcome after endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumors around the knee and to explore prognostic factors of functional outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent tumor prosthetic replacements consecutively. Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were used to assess the functional outcome at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The logistic model was used to select factors that had potential predictive value for postoperative function. Potential prognostic factors included age, gender, tumor site, type of tumor, length of bone resection, type of prosthesis, length of prosthetic stem, chemotherapy, pathological fracture, and body mass index. RESULTS: At the 24 months after surgery, the mean musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score was 81.4% and the mean Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) was 83.6%. At the last follow-up, 68% of patients and 73% of patients received perfect or good MSTS score and TESS score, respectively. The multivariate analysis according to ordered-logit model showed that age < 35 years, distal femoral prosthesis, and length of bone resection < 14 cm were independent prognostic factors of better functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Endoprosthetic reconstruction may provide good functional results for most patients. Younger patients with distal femoral prosthesis and shorter resection of bone (on the premise of complete resection of tumor) are more likely to obtain satisfactory functional results after surgery.

Deep Learning-Based Objective and Reproducible Osteosarcoma Chemotherapy Response Assessment and Outcome Prediction.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone cancer, whose standard treatment includes pre-operative chemotherapy followed by resection. Chemotherapy response is used for prognosis and management of patients. Necrosis is routinely assessed after chemotherapy from histology slides on resection specimens, where necrosis ratio is defined as the ratio of necrotic tumor/overall tumor. Patients with necrosis ratio ≥90% are known to have a better outcome. Manual microscopic review of necrosis ratio from multiple glass slides is semiquantitative and can have intraobserver and interobserver variability. In this study, an objective and reproducible deep learning-based approach was proposed to estimate necrosis ratio with outcome prediction from scanned hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs). To conduct the study, 103 osteosarcoma cases with 3134 WSIs were collected. Deep Multi-Magnification Network was trained to segment multiple tissue subtypes, including viable tumor and necrotic tumor at a pixel level and to calculate case-level necrosis ratio from multiple WSIs. Necrosis ratio estimated by the segmentation model highly correlates with necrosis ratio from pathology reports manually assessed by experts. Furthermore, patients were successfully stratified to predict overall survival with P = 2.4 × 10-6 and progression-free survival with P = 0.016. This study indicates that deep learning can support pathologists as an objective tool to analyze osteosarcoma from histology for assessing treatment response and predicting patient outcome.

Real-world use of bone modifying agents in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bone modifying agents (BMAs) prevent skeletal related events among patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) involving bone and prevent osteoporotic fractures among patients at high risk. BMA utilization for patients with mCRPC has not been well quantified. METHODS: We used linked SEER registry and Medicare claims data. We included men diagnosed with stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma during 2007-2015, aged > = 66 at diagnosis, with sufficient continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, who received androgen deprivation therapy. We limited to those who subsequently received a CRPC-defining treatment (CDT). We identified patients with evidence of bone metastasis using claims. Our primary outcome was receipt of a BMA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) within 180 days of initiating CDT. RESULTS: Among 1292 included patients, 1034 (80%) had bone metastasis. BMA use within 180 days of initiating CDT was higher among patients with bone metastases than those without (705/1034 [68%] vs 56/258 [22%]). Among patients without bone metastasis, those with high osteoporotic fracture risk were more likely than those without to receive a BMA (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.17, 5.29); however, only 26% of patients with high fracture risk received a BMA. Among patients who received BMAs, most (62%) first initiated them >90 days before initiating CDT. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients with mCRPC and bone metastases received BMAs within 180 days after initiating CDT. A greater proportion of patients without bone metastasis may warrant BMA therapy for osteoporotic fracture prevention. Some patients with bone metastasis may be able to delay BMA initiation until CRPC.

A Method of Bone-Metastatic Tumor Progression Assessment in Mice Using Longitudinal Radiography.

Many types of solid tumors metastasize to the bone, where it causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced disease. Bone metastases are not only incurable but also affect bone health which impairs patients' quality of life. In order to understand the mechanisms and develop effective treatments for bone-metastatic disease, it is first necessary to develop animal models that permit the assessment of tumor growth in the bone and progressive structural changes of the bone simultaneously. Longitudinal analysis of bone tumor progression is generally performed by bioluminescent imaging; however, this method is not able to assess progressive structural changes of the bone. Here, we describe a simple method for assessment of bone lesions using a scoring system that takes into account disease burden and bone destruction using longitudinal radiographs.

Cost-Efficiency Optimization Serves as a Conserved Mechanism that Promotes Osteosarcoma in Mammals.

Mutations that reduce the biosynthetic cost of ATP production or increase the gene translation efficiency (tAI) are favorable for rapid cell growth and proliferation and therefore likely to be observed in tumors. Whether the mutations in tumors optimize the trade-off between the ATP biosynthesis cost and gene translation efficiency by increasing the tAI/ATP ratio is currently unknown. We retrieved transcriptome data of normal and osteosarcoma tissue samples from humans and mice and identified tumor-specific mutations in each species by using stringent cutoffs and outgroup information. We compared the tAI/ATP values of genes before and after mutation. The tAI/ATP profile was found to be highly conserved in humans and mice, and also correlated with the essentiality of genes. Tumor-specific rather than shared mutations were found to lead to increased tAI/ATP values in both species. Thus, tumor-specific mutations were found to optimize the cost-efficiency trade-off by increasing the tAI/ATP ratio of genes in osteosarcoma. This may indicate an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that promotes tumorigenesis by facilitating rapid cell growth and proliferation.

Assessment of central cartilaginous tumor of the appendicular bone: inter-observer and intermodality agreement and comparison of diagnostic performance of CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic performance, inter-observer agreement, and intermodality agreement between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the depiction of the major distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors have not been investigated. PURPOSE: To determine the inter-observer and intermodality agreement of CT and MRI in the evaluation of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones, and to compare their diagnostic performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two independent radiologists retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT and MRI. Inter-observer and intermodality agreement between CT and MRI in the assessment of distinguishing imaging features, including lesion size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, pathologic fracture, soft tissue extension, and peritumoral edema, were evaluated. The agreement with histopathology and the accuracy of the radiologic diagnoses made with CT and MRI were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreements with regard to size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, and soft tissue extension (ICC = 0.96-0.99, k = 0.60-0.90). However, for the evaluation of pathologic fracture, MRI showed only moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.47). Peritumoral edema showed only fair intermodality agreement (k = 0.28-0.33) and moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.46) on CT. Both CT and MRI showed excellent diagnostic performance, with high agreement with the histopathology (k = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively) and high accuracy (91.7% for both CT and MRI). CONCLUSION: CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreement in the assessment of several distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones and demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance.

Diffusion kurtosis imaging assessment of the response to radiotherapy in a VX2 bone tumor model: an animal study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of malignant bone tumors, and non-invasive imaging methods are needed to evaluate the response to treatment. PURPOSE: To assess the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for monitoring early response to radiotherapy in malignant bone tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Treatment response was evaluated in a rabbit VX2 bone tumor model (n = 35) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), DKI, and histopathologic examinations. Subjects were divided into three groups: pre-treatment, post-treatment, and control groups. The post-treatment group was subclassified into good response and poor response groups according to the results of histopathologic examination. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and DKI parameters (mean diffusion coefficient [MD] and mean kurtosis [MK]) were recorded. The relationship between ADC, DKI parameters, and histopathologic changes after radiotherapy was determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance of these parameters was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: MD in the good response group was higher after treatment than before treatment (P < 0.001) and higher than that in the poor response group (P = 0.009). MD was highly correlated with tumor cell density and apoptosis rate (r = -0.771, P < 0.001 and r = 0.625, P < 0.001, respectively). MD was superior to other parameters for determining the curative effect of radiotherapy, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 100.0%, and area under the curve of 0.917 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The correlations between MD, tumor cell density, and apoptosis suggest that MD could be useful for assessing the early response to radiotherapy in rabbit VX2 malignant bone tumors.

Complications of surgery for giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities: Incidence, risk factors, management modality, and impact on functional and oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Due to the wide variations in location, size, local invasiveness, and treatment options, the complications associated with surgery for giant cell tumor of bone have been sporadically reported. For quality assessment, fundamental data based on large-scale surveys of complications under a universal evaluation system is needed. The Dindo-Clavien classification is an evaluation system for complications based on severity and required intervention type and is suitable for the evaluation of surgery in a heterogeneous cohort. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective survey of 141 patients who underwent surgery for giant cell tumor of bone in the extremity was performed. The incidence and risk factors of complications, type of intervention for complication control, and impact of complications on functional and oncological outcomes were analyzed using the Dindo-Clavien classification. RESULTS: Forty-six cases (32.6%) had one or more complications. Of them, 18 (12.8%), 11 (7.8%), and 17 (12.1%) cases were classified as Dindo-Clavien classification grade I, II, and III complications, respectively. There were no cases with grade IV or V complications. Progression in Campanacci grading (p = 0.04), resection (over curettage, p < 0.0001), reconstruction with prosthesis (p = 0.0007), and prolonged operative duration (p = 0.0002) were significant risk factors for complications. Complications had a significant impact on function (p < 0.0001). Differences in the impact of complication types and tumor location on function were confirmed. Complications had no impact on local recurrence and metastasis development. CONCLUSION: The Dindo-Clavien classification could provide fundamental information, under a uniform definition and classification system, on postoperative complications in patients with giant cell tumor of bone in terms of incidence, type of intervention for complication control, risk factors, and impact on functional outcome. The data are useful not only for preoperative evaluation for the risk of complications under specific conditions but also for quality assessment of surgery for giant cell tumor of bone.

The Lodwick classification for grading growth rate of lytic bone tumors: a decision tree approach.

The estimation of growth rate of lytic bone tumors based on conventional radiography has been extensively studied. While benign tumors exhibit slow growth, malignant tumors are more likely to show fast growth. The most frequently used algorithm for grading of growth rate on conventional radiography was published by Gwilym Lodwick. Based on the evaluation of the four descriptors (1) type of bone destruction (including the subdescriptor "margin" for geographic lesions), (2) penetration of cortex, (3) presence of a sclerotic rim, and (4) expanded shell, an overall growth grade (IA, IB, IC, II, III) can be assigned, with higher grade representing faster tumor growth. In this article, we provide an easy-to-use decision tree of Lodwick's original grading algorithm, suitable for teaching of students and residents. Subtleties of the grading algorithm and potential pitfalls in clinical practice are explained and illustrated. Exemplary conventional radiographs provided for each descriptor in the decision tree may be used as a guide and atlas for assisting in evaluation of individual features in daily clinical practice.

Association of loss of spleen visualization on whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with prognosis and tumor burden in patients with multiple myeloma.

This study investigated the clinical significance of loss of spleen visualization (LSV) on whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The WB-DWI of 96 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 15 patients with smoldering MM (sMM) were retrospectively reviewed. LSV was observed in 56 patients with NDMM (58.3%) and 1 patient with sMM (6.7%). Patients with NDMM with LSV had a higher median infiltration of bone marrow plasma cells (80.0% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.001) and median total diffusion volume (median; 540.2 vs. 137.0 mL, p = 0.003) than patients without LSV. Patients with LSV had a lower spleen-to-spinal cord ratio (0.36 vs. 0.96, p < 0.001) and worse 2-year overall survival (OS) (84.6% vs. 100%, p = 0.032). Patients who did not recover spleen visualization during treatment had a worse prognosis, even when they obtained very good partial response (median progression-free survival: 13.2 months). Spleen histopathological findings revealed higher cellularity and diffuse myeloma cell infiltration in a patient with LSV and splenic amyloidosis without extramedullary hematopoiesis in a patient without LSV. Therefore, LSV indicates worse prognosis for patients with MM, even when the patient responds to treatment. Further studies are warranted to clarify the immunological role of spleen in MM.

Socioeconomic factors associated with limb salvage versus amputation for adult extremity bone sarcomas in patients with insurance coverage.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage (LS) has become the preferred treatment for adult patients with bone sarcoma of the extremities. The decision to perform LS versus an amputation is often dictated by tumor characteristics, however there may be socioeconomic factors associated with LS. Previously this has been linked to insurance status, however currently there is a paucity of data examining socioeconomic factors in patients with medical insurance at the time of sarcoma diagnosis. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to examine socioeconomic factors which could be associated with the decision to perform LS versus amputation for adult bone sarcoma patients. METHODS: Data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database, was analyzed to identify patients with extremity bone sarcomas from 2006 to 2017. Bivariate regression was used to identify factors associated with LS versus amputation. RESULTS: Of 1,390 (743 males, 647 female) patients, 252 (18%) under amputation while 1,138 (82%) underwent LS. Lower extremity tumors (OR 4.72, p < 0.001), income <$75,000 (OR 1.85, p = 0.03), being treated a public hospital (OR 1.41, p = 0.04) and a hospital with <200 beds (OR 1.90, p = 0.006) were associated with amputation. Income ≥$125,000 (OR 0.62, 0.04) were associated with LS. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with medical insurance at the time of diagnosis, socioeconomic and hospital factors were associated with an amputation for bone sarcoma, with poorer patients, and those treated at smaller, and public hospitals more likely to undergo amputation.