A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. RESULTS: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population.

Peak power output testing: novel method for preoperative assessment of exercise capacity.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of exercise capacity is an important component of risk assessment before major surgery. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides comprehensive assessment but is resource-intensive, limiting widespread adoption. Measurement of a patient's peak power output (PPO) using a simplified test on a cycle ergometer has the potential to identify patients likely to have abnormal CPET findings and to be at increased perioperative risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for PPO to identify those with abnormal CPET and to determine whether PPO predicted the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a single-centre cohort, the ability of PPO to predict a high-risk CPET result in patients undergoing major cancer surgery was analysed. The assessment was validated in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery from a UK national multicentre cohort. The association between PPO and adverse postoperative outcomes to traditional CPET-derived variables were compared. RESULTS: In 2262 patients from a single centre, PPO was an excellent discriminator of high-risk CPET, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.901 (95 per cent c.i. 0.888 to 0.913). In the national cohort of 2742 patients, there was excellent discrimination, with an AUROC of 0.856 (0.842 to 0.871). A PPO cut-off of 1.5 W/kg may be appropriate for use in screening, with a sensitivity of 90 per cent in both cohorts. PPO and traditional CPET-derived predictors demonstrated similar discrimination of major postoperative complications and death. The association between PPO and major postoperative complications persisted on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a role for the PPO test in preoperative screening and risk stratification for major surgery. Prospective evaluation is recommended.

Systematic Review of Intraoperative Assessment Tools in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To collect, summarize, and evaluate the currently available intraoperative rating tools used in abdominal minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2000, to May 12, 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A systematic search strategy was designed and executed. Published studies evaluating an assessment tool in abdominal MIGS cases were included. Studies focused on simulation, reviews, and abstracts without a published manuscript were excluded. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed for each study. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Disparate study methods prevented quantitative synthesis of the data. Ten studies were included in the analysis. The tools were grouped into global (n = 4) and procedure-specific assessments (n = 6). Most studies evaluated small numbers of surgeons and lacked a comparison group to evaluate the effectiveness of the tool. All studies demonstrated content validity and at least 1 dimension of reliability, and 2 have external validity. The intraoperative procedure-specific tools have been more thoroughly evaluated than the global scales. CONCLUSION: Procedure-specific intraoperative assessment tools for MIGS cases are more thoroughly evaluated than global tools; however, poor-quality studies and borderline reliability limit their use. Well-designed, controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of intraoperative assessment tools in MIGS are needed.

Assessment of Secondary Sarcomas Among Patients With Cancer of the Abdomen or Pelvis Who Received Combinations of Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy vs Surgery Alone.

Importance: The association of radiation and chemotherapy with the development of secondary sarcoma is known, but the contemporary risk has not been well characterized for patients with cancers of the abdomen and pelvis. Objective: To compare the risk of secondary sarcoma among patients treated with combinations of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy with patients treated with surgery alone and the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study included 173 580 patients in Ontario, Canada, with nonmetastatic cancer of the prostate, bladder, colon, rectum or anus, cervix, uterus, or testis. Patients were enrolled from January 1, 2002, to January 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Exposures: Treatment combinations of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. Main Outcome and Measures: Diagnosis of sarcoma based on histologic codes from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Time to sarcoma was compared using a cause-specific proportional hazard model. Results: Of 173 580 patients, most were men (125 080 [72.1%]), and the largest group was aged between 60 and 69 years (58 346 [33.6%]). Most patients had genitourinary cancer (86 235 [51.4%]) or colorectal cancer (69 241 [39.9%]). Overall, 64 301 (37.1%) received surgery alone, 51 220 (29.5%) received radiation alone, 15 624 (9.0%) were treated with radiation and chemotherapy, 15 252 (8.8%) received radiation with surgery, and 11 822 (6.8%) received all 3 treatments. A total of 332 patients (0.2%) had sarcomas develop during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 5.7 (2.2-8.9) years. The incidence of sarcoma was 0.3% among those who underwent radiation alone (138 of 51 220) and radiation with chemotherapy (40 of 15 624), 0.2% among those who received radiation and surgery (36 of 15 252) and all 3 modalities (25 of 11 822), and 0.1% among those who received surgery with chemotherapy (13 of 14 861) and surgery alone (80 of 64 801). Compared with a reference group of patients who had surgery alone, the greatest risk of sarcoma was found among patients who underwent a combination of radiation and chemotherapy (cause-specific relative hazard [csRH], 4.07; 95% CI, 2.75-6.01; P < .001), followed by patients who had radiation alone (csRH, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.77-3.12; P < .001), radiation with surgery (csRH, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.57-3.46; P < .001), and all 3 modalities (csRH, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.44-3.58; P < .001). In the general population, 7987 events occurred during 46 554 803 person-years (17.2 events per 100 000 person-years). The standardized incidence ratio for sarcoma among patients treated with radiation compared with the general population was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.57-3.69; 41.3 events per 100 000 person-years). The annual number of cases of sarcoma increased from 2009 (15 per 100 000 persons) to 2016 (32 per 100 000 persons), but the annual rate did not change during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients treated with radiation or chemotherapy for abdominopelvic cancers had an increased rate of sarcoma. Although the absolute rate is low, patients and physicians should be aware of this increased risk of developing sarcoma.

Venous Thromboembolism Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery in the Korean Population: Incidence and Validation of a Risk Assessment Model.

BACKGROUND: A cancer patient slated for abdominal surgery is considered to be at moderate to high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the incidence is quite low in Korean patients. Most risk assessment models and recommendations for VTE management are from Western reports, however they possibly overestimate the risk of VTE in the Korean population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1966 patients who were diagnosed with abdominal organ cancer and required surgical treatment. RESULTS: Each patient was rated using the Caprini risk scoring model. The mean score was 7.5 ± 0.7 points; 98.4% of patients were classified as high risk for VTE. Symptomatic VTE occurred in eight patients, and the overall incidence was 0.4%. The mean Caprini score for VTE patients was 8.8 ± 1.9 points. In the group with scores between 5 and 9 points, the incidence was 0.3-0.5%, while in patients with scores > 10 points, the incidence of VTE was found to be 1.12%. CONCLUSIONS: The risk stratification system in the Caprini scoring model needs to be modified based on the actual incidence in the Korean population.

Educating Surgical Oncology Providers on Perioperative Opioid Use: Results of a Departmental Survey on Perceptions of Opioid Needs and Prescribing Habits.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing oncologic surgery are at risk for persistent postoperative opioid use. As a quality improvement initiative, this study sought to characterize provider perceptions regarding opioid-prescribing after oncologic procedures. METHODS: Surgical oncology attending physicians, clinical fellows, and advanced practice providers (APPs) at a high-volume cancer center were surveyed before and after educational sessions focusing on the opioid epidemic with review of departmental data. RESULTS: The pre-education response rates were 72 (70%) of 103: 22 (65%) of 34 attending physicians, 19 (90%) of 21 fellows, and 31 (65%) of 48 APPs. For five index operations (open abdominal resection, laparoscopic colectomy, wide local excision, thyroidectomy, port), the fellows answered that patients should stop receiving opioids sooner than recommended by the attending surgeons or APPs. For four of five procedures, the APPs recommended higher discharge opioid prescriptions than the attending surgeons or fellows. Almost half of the providers (n = 46, 45%) responded to both the pre- and post-education surveys. After the intervention, the providers recommended lower numbers of opioid pills and indicated that patients should be weaned from opioids sooner for all the procedures. Compared with pre-education, more providers agreed post-education that discharge opioid prescriptions should be based on a patient's last 24 h of inpatient opioid use (83 vs 91%; p = 0.006). The providers who did not attend a session showed no difference in perceptions or recommendations at the repeat assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Variation exists in perioperative opioid-prescribing among provider types, with those most involved in daily care and discharge processes generally recommending more opioids. After education, providers lowered discharge opioid recommendations and thought patients should stop receiving opioids sooner. The next steps include assessing for quantitative changes in opioid-prescribing and implementing standardized opioid prescription algorithms.

Postoperative Investigations Resulting in Cost Reduction in Oncological Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery.

AIM: Rising costs in health care are of progressively growing interest and a major factor affecting hospitalization costs is represented by postoperative complications. Complications of Major Abdominal Surgery (MAS) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study estimates the costs of postoperative care associated with complications. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 254 patients admitted to the 1st General and Oncological Surgery Clinic of the Bucharest Oncology Institute who were submitted to MAS. The total hospitalization, complications and treatment costs were analysed. Results: For a patient undergoing MAS, the average costs for surgery without complications are 5,791.3 RON and reach an average of 20,806 RON after major complications. CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into the costs of hospitalization for oncology patients submitted to surgical interventions. Complications occur in 20.86% of patients undergoing MAS and account for 50% of total care costs. Establishing and implementing a protocol aimed at early diagnosis and treatment of specific complications could lead to a decrease in morbidity and mortality, as well as of the costs of hospitalization.

Cumulative deficit model of geriatric assessment to predict the postoperative outcomes of older patients with solid abdominal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The geriatric assessment (GA) has proven to be of great value for clinicians treating older patients. However, a clear consensus on the optimal set of GA instruments is lacking, particularly for surgical patients. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to compare the prevalence of frailty, depending on the number of incorporated GA domains, and to evaluate its accuracy in predicting postoperative outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients aged 65 years and older, qualified for abdominal surgery due to solid cancer, were enrolled. The GA included a wide variety of validated tools that evaluate functional, mobility, nutritional, co-morbidity, polypharmacy, and psychosocial domains. RESULTS: Depending on the number of incorporated GA domains the frequency of frailty was 23-97%. The cumulative score rather than individual components of the GA, turned out to be an independent risk factor of 30-day postoperative morbidity. In predicting 30-day "any" and "major" morbidities, the area under the curve was 0.67-0.72 and 0.70-0.82 (model including the severity of the surgery) vs. 0.57-0.66 and 0.50-0.65 (model not including the severity of the surgery), respectively. CONCLUSION: The number of incorporated GA domains has a great influence on the prevalence of frailty and on adequate surgical risk assessment. The summary deficit score based on Pre-operative Assessment of Cancer in the Elderly (PACE) or the GA consisting of functional, mobility, cognitive, depression, nutritional, co-morbidity, polypharmacy, and social support assessment domains can predict 30-day postoperative morbidity. However, only models with addition of the severity of surgery show moderate to good predictive value.

Image-defined risk factor assessment of neurogenic tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is useful for predicting intra-operative risk factors and the completeness of resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuroblastoma are now stratified at diagnosis according to the presence and number of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs). We examined the added value of IDRF assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for predicting surgical resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2009-2012, 39 out of 91 patients operated on in our institution for neuroblastic tumors received neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on ongoing SIOPEN protocols or treatment guidelines. IDRFs were assessed both at diagnosis and preoperatively on CT and/or MRI. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 30 months [range 2-191]. The tumor locations were adrenal (n = 20), paravertebral (n = 13) and perivascular (n = 6). INRGSS stages were L2 (n = 13), M (n = 25) and Ms (n = 1). Eleven tumors (28%) were MYCN-amplified. Chemotherapy reduced the number of IDRFs in 54% of patients overall (21/39): 61.5% (16/26) of M and Ms patients, and 38.5% (5/13) of non metastatic patients (P < 0.001). The number of IDRFs lost after chemotherapy was proportional to the degree of tumor shrinkage (P = 0.002), independent of the primary tumor location (P = 0.73), although the number was higher in patients with left versus right adrenal locations (P = 0.004). Patients with neuroblastoma on post-surgical histology lost more IDRFs (median: 1[0-9]) than patients with ganglioneuroblastoma (median: 0[0-4]) (P < 0.001). The completeness of resection was related only to the number of preoperative IDRFs (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: IDRF assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is useful for predicting completeness of resection of neurogenic tumors. A larger international study is needed to confirm these results and to explore a possible correlation between preoperative IDRF status and survival.

Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model.

Solitary fibrous tumor represents a spectrum of mesenchymal tumors, encompassing tumors previously termed hemangiopericytoma, which are classified as having intermediate biological potential (rarely metastasizing) in the 2002 World Health Organization classification scheme. Few series have reported on clinicopathological predictors with outcome data and formal statistical analysis in a large series of primary tumors as a single unified entity. Institutional pathology records were reviewed to identify primary solitary fibrous tumor cases, and histological sections and clinical records reviewed for canonical prognostic indicators, including patient age, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism, and tumor necrosis. Patients (n=103) with resected primary solitary fibrous tumor were identified (excluding meningeal tumors). The most common sites of occurrence were abdomen and pleura; these tumors were larger than those occurring in the extremities, head and neck or trunk, but did not demonstrate significant outcome differences. Overall 5- and 10-year metastasis-free rates were 74 and 55%, respectively, while 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 89 and 73%. Patient age, tumor size, and mitotic index predicted both time to metastasis and disease-specific mortality, while necrosis predicted metastasis only. A risk stratification model based on age, size, and mitotic index clearly delineated patients at high risk for poor outcomes. While small tumors with low mitotic rates are highly unlikely to metastasize, large tumors ≥ 15 cm, which occur in patients ≥ 55 years, with mitotic figures ≥ 4/10 high-power fields require close follow-up and have a high risk of both metastasis and death.

Assessment of ACS NSQIP's predictive ability for adverse events after major cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) has improved operative outcomes in the USA. However, its applicability to oncologic resections at ACS NSQIP hospitals has not been fully explored. We assessed the ability of factors currently collected by ACS NSQIP to predict adverse operative events after major cancer surgery. METHODS: Using pre- and intraoperative factors gathered by the 2005-2008 ACS NSQIP, we constructed logistic regression models to determine their ability to predict 30-day mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), major complications or increased number of complications in 15,709 patients who underwent major cancer surgery at 211 hospitals. We assessed each model's predictive ability using the c-index. RESULTS: While the mortality rate was relatively low (2.5%), nearly 24% of patients experienced major adverse events. However, up to 43% of patients with prolonged LOS did not have any major complication captured by NSQIP. Furthermore, our model predicting complications showed poor overall predictive ability compared with those predicting mortality and LOS (c-index <0.67 versus 0.80 and 0.73, respectively). When stratified by procedure, the complication model's predictive ability remained less accurate than models predicting 30-day mortality or prolonged LOS. These results remain unchanged after additional sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Current ACS NSQIP variables show low predictive ability for major complications after major oncologic resections. Addition of some disease- and operation-specific variables may be an important consideration in the further evolution of the NSQIP to allow for more accurate predictions of adverse outcomes for major oncologic resections.

A pilot study evaluating predictors of postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery: Physiological capacity compared with the ASA physical status classification system.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study compared the risk predictive value of preoperative physiological capacity (PC: defined by gas exchange measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing) with the ASA physical status classification in the same patients (n=32) undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS: Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to measurements of PC and ASA rank data determining their predictive value for postoperative morbidity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to discriminate between the predictive abilities, exploring trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Individual statistically significant predictors of postoperative morbidity included the ASA rank [P=0.038, area under the curve (AUC)=0.688, sensitivity=0.630, specificity=0.750] and three newly identified measures of PC: PAT (% predicted anaerobic threshold achieved, <75% vs > or =75%), DeltaHR1 (heart rate response from rest to the anaerobic threshold), and HR3 (heart rate at the anaerobic threshold). A two-variable model of PC measurements (DeltaHR1+PAT) was also shown to be statistically significant in the prediction of postoperative morbidity (P=0.023, AUC=0.826, sensitivity=0.813, specificity=0.688). CONCLUSIONS: Three newly identified PC measures and the ASA rank were significantly associated with postoperative morbidity; none showed a statistically greater association compared with the others. PC appeared to improve predictive sensitivity. The potential for new unidentified measures of PC to predict postoperative outcomes remains unexplored.

[Visceral and thoracic surgical interventions in patients over 80 years old. Evaluation of cost coverage]. / Viszeral- und thoraxchirurgische Eingriffe bei über 80-Jährigen : Bewertung der Kostendeckung.

Due to the higher incidence of malignant tumours with increasing age, cancer is the second most common cause of death among those aged over 65 years old. Consequently, demographic changes in Germany have resulted in a rising demand for oncological operations in elderly patients which is more cost-intensive. Objective of the present study in the setting of a university surgical department is whether oncological operations on patients over 80 years old is cost-effective in the era of diagnosis-related groups. The revenue and expenditure of 116 cases of patients over 80 years old documented for the years 2005-2007 were collated and evaluated. The calculated average proceeds were compared with cases of patients under 80 years old.The average return was -1493.50 EUR/case for over 80-year olds and was not cost-effective. The presence or absence of complications had a significant impact on proceeds, because the mean return/case without complications was profitable (1297.30 EUR). Medical care of patients over 80 years old was on average cost-effective and generated a profit. Oncological operations in patients under 80 years old were not sufficiently remunerated by the current DRG system. Therefore, there is an economical risk associated with oncological operations in elderly patients.

Surgical risk factors in primary surgery for localized neuroblastoma: the LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group.

PURPOSE: Although tumor resection is the mainstay of treatment for localized neuroblastoma, there are no established guidelines indicating which patients should be operated on immediately and which should undergo surgery after tumor reduction with chemotherapy. In an effort to develop such guidelines, the LNESG1 study defined surgical risk factors (SRFs) based on the imaging characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 905 patients with suspected localized neuroblastoma were registered by 10 European countries between January 1995 and October 1999; 811 of 905 patients were eligible for this analysis. RESULTS: Information on SRFs was obtained for 719 of 811 patients; 367 without and 352 with SRFs. Of these 719 patients, 201 patients (four without and 197 with SRFs) underwent biopsy only. An attempt at tumor excision was made in 518 patients: 363 of 367 patients without and 155 of 352 patients with SRFs (98.9% v 44.0%). Complete excision was achieved in 271 of 363 patients without and in 72 of 155 patients with SRF (74.6% v 46.4%), near-complete excision was achieved in 81 and 61 patients (22.3% v 39.3%), and incomplete excision was achieved in 11 and 22 patients (3.0% v 14.2%), respectively. There were two surgery-related deaths. Nonfatal surgery-related complications occurred in 45 of 518 patients (8.7%) and were less frequent in patients without SRFs (5.0% v 17.4%). Associated surgical procedures were also less frequent in patients without SRFs (1.6% v 9.7%). CONCLUSION: The adoption of SRFs as predictors of adverse surgical outcome was validated because their presence was associated with lower complete resection rate and greater risk of surgery-related complications. Additional studies aiming to better define the surgical approach to localized neuroblastoma are warranted.

Functional assessment of the shoulder following latissimus dorsi muscle donation in the handicapped.

The latissimus dorsi muscle, one of the largest muscles in the human body, has gained widespread popularity in microsurgical reconstruction. Because the latissimus serves to adduct and medially rotate the upper extremity, caution in its use has been advocated in handicapped and non-ambulatory patients, although a paucity of information exists in the literature. The purpose of this reported project was to determine whether the loss of the latissimus dorsi could be documented objectively or subjectively, either in the preoperative condition or post-harvesting in the handicapped patients. Two paraplegic patients were studied. Results indicate a lack of objective functional deficit; this includes both the nerve-blocked state and the postoperative condition. In addition, both patients failed to demonstrate the need to change any activities of daily living. This evidence suggests that, although careful decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis, the use of the latissimus dorsi muscle is not necessarily contraindicated in this group of patients.

Staging laparoscopy in the management of intra-abdominal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy in the evaluation of intra-abdominal malignancies has become a debated issue. Proponents have claimed that it increases resectability rates, whereas opponents suggest that many patients require laparotomy regardless of the laparoscopic findings. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing staging laparoscopy versus those who were managed by initial exploratory laparotomy. METHODS: The medical records of all patients during an 18-month period who underwent surgical evaluation for upper gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary malignancies were reviewed. Forty-eight patients underwent staging laparoscopy (SL) initially; 80 patients underwent initial exploratory laparotomy (EL). Data obtained included type of cancer, laparoscopic findings, laparoscopic determination of resectability, laparoscopic procedures, open determination of resectability, open procedures, and length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was done by using Fisher exact test or the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The malignancies of 75% of patients were deemed resectable by SL. Of these, 77.8% were resected. This compares to 56.3% resectability rate in the EL group (P = .025). SL findings in patients with unresectable malignancies were carcinomatosis (75%), liver metastasis (33.3%), and direct invasion (16.7%). In the 8 false-negative SLs, 75% were unresectable as a result of vascular invasion and 25% for other reasons. Findings in the EL group whose malignancies were unresectable were carcinomatosis (34.3%), direct invasion (22.6%), liver metastasis (42.9%), and vascular invasion only (17.1%). Therefore 82.9% of patients in the EL group could have been determined to have unresectable malignancy by SL. In the EL group 22.5% of the laparotomies were nontherapeutic, whereas 4.2% of patients in the SL group underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy. Average LOS for unresectable patients in the SL group was 0.5 days, with 75% discharged the same day of operation. This compares to 10.9 days in the EL group (P < .00001) and 7.6 days in the nontherapeutic EL group (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: SL increases the resectability rate, decreases the nontherapeutic laparotomy rate, and decreases LOS in patients with unresectable disease. SL is poor at detecting unresectability as a result of vascular invasion only, but this accounts for less than one-fifth of patients. Laparoscopic sonography and palliation may further decrease the need for EL.

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elective cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial with venographic assessment. ENOXACAN Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for malignant disease carries a high risk of deep vein thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic effect of a low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, beginning 2 h before surgery, compared with that of unfractionated low-dose heparin three times daily. METHODS: Patients included were over 40 years of age and undergoing planned elective curative abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer. The study was designed as a prospective double-blind randomized multicentre trial with participating departments from ten countries. Primary outcome was venous thromboembolism as detected by mandatory bilateral venography or pulmonary scintigraphy. Follow-up was at 3 months. RESULTS: Some 1115 patients were randomized into the study but venograms were inadequate in 460 (41.3 per cent). Of 631 evaluable patients, a total of 104 (16.5 per cent) developed thromboembolic complications. The frequency was 18.2 per cent in the heparin group and 14.7 per cent in the enoxaparin group (95 per cent confidence interval of the difference -9.2-2.3 per cent). There were no differences in bleeding events or other complications. One patient in the heparin group developed severe thrombocytopenia. There were no differences in mortality at either 30 days or 3 months. CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, is as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin three times daily in preventing venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major elective surgery for abdominal or pelvic malignancy.

[Prolonged intensive care stay after abdominal surgery interventions with special reference to quality of life, occupational rehabilitation and economics]. / Untersuchungen zu prolongierten Intensivverläufen nach abdominalchirurgischen Eingriffen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Lebensqualität, beruflicher Rehabilitation und Okonomie.

Owing to increasing limitations on resources in health care, there is an urgent need to investigate effectiveness and efficiency of medical procedures. Therefore, we retrospectively studied the courses of 62 surgical patients who required at least 30 days of intensive care regarding mortality, long-term prognosis and quality of life. Additionally, a cost analysis was made using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The hospital mortality was 40.3%. The overall median survival time of discharged patients (n = 37) was 3.7 years and the calculated 3-year survival was 56.4%. The most frequent causes of death were septic complications or multiple organ failure in hospitalized patients and tumor relapses in discharged patients. In most of the surviving patients quality of life (median Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: 104 points) was good. About 20% of the discharged patients were able to return to work. Although extended intensive care therapy is extremely expensive (DM 68,250 per QALY), these costs are comparable with other accepted procedures in medicine (i.e. hemodialysis). Therefore, economical aspects should not be a generalized reason for withdrawing or withholding intensive care therapy.

[The efficacy dilemma]. / Das Effizienz-Dilemma.

Effectivity and efficiency of medical treatment have conflicting aims which result in a conflict of interests between a patient, interested in maximal effectively and the society, interested in maximal efficiency. The physician cannot solve this conflict because he is primarily obliged to the interests of the individual patient. If rationing is unavoidable in modern health care services, there must be an open discussion in order to reach a broad consensus within the society.