Epidemiology and management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology and management of oral cavity cancer have changed considerably in recent decades. This study examines epidemiological and management trends in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of data from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland between 1994 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 2725 patients were identified. The most common subsites were the tongue (34 %, n = 1025), lip (19 %, n = 575), floor of mouth (FOM) (18 %, n = 550), and retromolar trigone (RMT) (6 %, n = 189). The incidence of OCSCC remained largely unchanged (3.14 cases/100000/year) during the study period. 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 58.6 % overall, varying between subsites (lip 85 %, RMT 62.9 %, tongue 54.7 %, and FOM 47.3 %). DSS improved over the study period (p = 0.03), in particular for tongue primaries (p = 0.007). Primary surgery significantly improved DSS versus radiotherapy (HR 0.28, p < 0.0001). Survival of T4 disease managed surgically was superior to that of T1 disease managed with radiotherapy. In node positive patients, chemotherapy improved overall survival (HR 0.8 p = 0.038) but not DSS (HR 0.87 p = 0.215). CONCLUSION: Primary surgery remains the standard of care in the management of OCSCC. Prognosis has improved in line with an increase in the use of primary surgery in the same time frame, though the incidence remains unchanged.

Contrasting clinical outcomes and socio-economic impact of young versus elderly-onset oral squamous cell carcinoma, a novel health economic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of young-onset oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is growing, even among non-smokers/drinkers. The effects of adverse histopathological features on long-term oncologic outcomes between the young and old are controversial and confounded by significant heterogeneity. Few studies have evaluated the socio-economic impact of premature mortality from OSCC. Our study seeks to quantify these differences and their economic impact on society. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-eight young (<45 years) and 1660 old patients (≥45 years) with OSCC were studied. Logistic regression determined predictors of recurrence and death. Survival analysis was calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. A separate health economic analysis was conducted for India and Singapore. Years of Potential Productive Life Lost (YPPLL) were estimated with the Human Capital Approach, and premature mortality cost was derived using population-level data. RESULTS: Adverse histopathological features were seen more frequently in young OSCC: PNI (42.9% vs. 35%, p = 0.002), LVI (22.4% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.013) and ENE (36% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). Although 5-year OS/DSS were similar, the young cohort had received more intensive adjuvant therapy (CCRT 26.9% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001). Among Singaporean males, the premature mortality cost per death was US $396,528, and per YPPLL was US $45,486. This was US $397,402 and US $38,458 for females. Among Indian males, the premature mortality cost per death was US $30,641, and per YPPLL was US $595. This was US $ 21,038 and US $305 for females. CONCLUSION: Young-onset OSCC is an aggressive disease, mitigated by the ability to receive intensive adjuvant treatment. From our loss of productivity analysis, the socio-economic costs from premature mortality are substantial. Early cancer screening and educational outreach campaigns should be tailored to this cohort. Alongside, more funding should be diverted to genetic research, developing novel biomarkers and improving the efficacy of adjuvant treatment in OSCC.

Conventional Therapies of Oral Cancers: Highlights on Chemotherapeutic Agents and Radiotherapy, Their Adverse Effects, and the Cost Burden of Conventional Therapies.

Oral cancer (OC) is increasing worldwide, and it is mostly present to clinic in the late-stage of disease. Cancer of the lips, tongue, hard palate, upper and lower gingiva, buccal mucosa, and retromolar trigone are all included in the category of oral cavity cancer. Disease symptomatology and pathological grading decides the course of treatment. Several treatment modalities either alone in combinations may be utilized for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), including surgery, radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy/brachytherapy), and adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Cancer patients also face a greater risk of oral side effects from chemotherapy, such as slowed tissue healing, bone, and salivary gland damage and disintegration, and disruption of the normal bacterial balance in the mouth. Consequently, the economic burden of the salivary gland, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal cancers must be also known for budget allocation, designing different programs and management strategies targeting oral cancers by any healthcare institutes. This article provides a summary of the most recent research that supports the use of chemotherapy for patients with advanced illness both alone and in conjunction with radiation including its adverse events and cost burden for oral cancers.

Individualized risk assessment of distant metastases in oral cavity carcinoma: a validated predictive-score model.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for distant metastases (DMs) in oral cavity carcinoma (OCC). METHODS: Patients with OCC who were treated at 4 tertiary cancer institutions with curative surgery with or without postoperative radiation/chemoradiation therapy were randomly assigned to discovery or validation cohorts (3:2 ratio). Cases were staged on the basis of tumor, node, and metastasis staging according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control guidelines. Predictors of DMs on multivariable analysis in the discovery cohort were used to develop a risk-score model and classify patients into risk groups. The utility of the risk classification was evaluated in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 2749 patients were analyzed. Predictors (risk score coefficient) of DMs in the discovery cohort were the following: pathological stage (p)T3-4 (0.4), pN+ (N1: 0.8; N2: 1.0; N3: 1.5), histologic grade (G) 3 (G3, 0.7), and lymphovascular invasion (0.4). The DM risk groups were defined by the sum of the following risk score coefficients: high (>1.7), intermediate (0.7-1.7), and standard risk (<0.7). The 5-year DM rates (high/intermediate/standard risk groups) were 30%/15%/4% in the discovery cohort (C-index = 0.79) and 35%/16%/5% in the validation cohort, respectively (C-index = 0.77; both P < .001). In the whole cohort, this predictive model showed excellent discriminative ability in predicting DMs without locoregional failure (29%/11%/1%), later (>2 year) DMs (11%/4%/2%), and DMs in patients treated with surgery (20%/12%/5%), postoperative radiation therapy (34%/17%/4%), and postoperative chemoradiation therapy (39%/18%/7%) (all P < .001). The 5-year overall survival rates in the overall cohort were 25%/51%/67% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at higher risk for DMs were identified by use of a predictive-score model for DMs that included pT3-4, pN1/2/3, G3, and lymphovascular invasion. Identified patients may be evaluated for individualized risk-adaptive treatment escalation and/or surveillance strategies.

Estimating the direct costs of oral cancer in Spain: a retrospective hospital data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the costs incurred from cancer in Spain are scarce and have focused on the most prevalent types such as colorectal, breast, and lung cancer. The aim of this study was to calculate the direct costs associated with the diagnostic, treatment and follow-up procedures for oral cancer in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Applying a bottom-up approach, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of a cohort of 200 patients with oral cancer (C00-C10), diagnosed and treated in Spain between 2015 and 2017. For each patient, we collected their age, sex, degree of medical impairment (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), tumor extent (TNM classification), relapses and survival during the first 2 years of follow-up. The final calculation of the costs is expressed in absolute values in euros as the percentage of the gross domestic product per capita and in international dollars (I$). RESULTS: The total cost per patient rose to €16,620 (IQR, €13,726; I$11,634), and the total direct cost at the national level was €136,084,560 (I$95,259,192). The mean cost for oral cancer represented 65.1% of the gross domestic product per capita. The costs for the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were determined by the ASA grade, tumor size, lymph node infiltration and presence of metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs for oral cancer are considerable compared with other types of cancer. In terms of gross domestic product, the costs were similar to those of countries neighboring Spain, such as Italy and Greece. The main determinants of this economic burden were the patient's degree of medical impairment and tumor extent.

Oral cancer care in the "Metropolitan I" health region in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: enabling and constraining factors. / Atenção ao câncer bucal na região de saúde Metropolitana I do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: fatores facilitadores e coercitivos.

The aim was to identify constraining and enabling factors related to the organization of health care networks that influence access to oral cancer diagnosis and treatment. A case study in the "Metropolitan I" health region using data collected from health information systems and 26 semi-structured interviews with health managers and professionals. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and strategic conduct analysis, drawing on the theory of structuration proposed by Giddens. The findings reveal that coverage of oral health care in primary care services is generally low and prioritizes specific groups and urgent cases, hampering access to oral cancer diagnosis. While the presence of a network of secondary care services in the municipalities that make up the health region facilitates diagnosis, there are major barriers to treatment. Informal partnerships established with dental schools play an important role in diagnosis, but do not receive funding. The regulation of appointments for diagnosis was not restrictive. In contrast, the regulation of referrals for treatment lacked transparency, was subject to long delays, and shortage of places. Despite advances, constraining factors related to structure and the actions of agents involved in the care process persist, hampering the timely diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer.

O objetivo foi identificar os fatores facilitadores e coercitivos da organização da rede de atenção à saúde que intervêm sobre o acesso ao diagnóstico e tratamento do câncer bucal. Um estudo de caso da região de saúde Metropolitana I do estado do Rio de Janeiro, com coleta de dados em sistemas de informação e 26 entrevistas com gestores e profissionais. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio das técnicas de estatística descritiva e análise temática, à luz da Teoria da Estruturação de Giddens. Identificou-se baixa cobertura de saúde bucal na atenção básica, com priorização do acesso a grupos prioritários e urgências, dificultando o acesso ao diagnóstico do câncer bucal neste nível de atenção. A presença da rede secundária em todos os municípios da região facilita o diagnóstico, porém há limites para o acesso ao tratamento. Faculdades de odontologia atuam no diagnóstico como rede informal, ação importante, mas não financiada. A regulação para o diagnóstico não foi restritiva, mas para o tratamento a regulação foi considerada pouco transparente e demorada, com falta de vagas. Apesar dos avanços, persistem fatores coercitivos estruturais e nas ações dos agentes que restringem diagnóstico e tratamento oportuno do câncer bucal.

Financial impact of oral cancer treatment on the households in rural India.

Background: Oral cancer ranks second and accounts for over 20% of all cancers reported in India. Like management of all other cancers, oral cancers bring a heavy financial burden to their families. This study analyzes the financial burden on families during the management of oral cancer at Kasturba Hospital, Sewagram, a government-aided tertiary health care facility in central India. Methods: The hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the cancer unit of a government-aided tertiary hospital of central India. A total of 100 patients with oral cancer being treated in the hospital were included in the study. Information regarding cost incurred on management of oral cancer was inquired from a close family member or a caregiver of the study subjects. Results: The out-of-pocket expenditure on treatment of oral cancer was approximately INR 100,000 (USD 1363). It has been found that 96% of families experienced catastrophic health expenditure as a result of treatment. Conclusion: Although India aims for universal health coverage, it is important to protect cancer patients from catastrophic health expenditure.

Oral Cancer Prevalence, Mortality, and Costs in Medicaid and Commercial Insurance Claims Data.

BACKGROUND: This study compared prevalence, incidence, mortality rates, treatment costs, and risk factors for oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) between two large United States adult cohorts in 2012-2019. METHODS: Medicaid and commercial claims data came from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database. Logistic regression analyses estimated incidence and risk factors for OC/OPC. Mortality was calculated by merging deceased individuals' files with those of the existing cancer cohort. Summing costs of outpatient and inpatient services determined costs. RESULTS: Prevalence of OC/OPC in Medicaid enrollees decreased each year (129.8 cases per 100,000 enrollees in 2012 to 88.5 in 2019); commercial enrollees showed a lower, more stable prevalence (64.7 per 100,000 in 2012 and 2019). Incidence trended downward in both cohorts, with higher incidence in the Medicaid (51.4-37.6 cases per 100,000) than the commercial cohort (31.9-31.0 per 100,000). Mortality rates decreased for Medicaid enrollees during 2012-2014 but increased in the commercial cohort. OC/OPC treatment costs were higher for commercial enrollees by $8.6 million during 2016-2019. OC/OPC incidence was higher among adults who were older, male, and white; used tobacco or alcohol; or had prior human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome diagnosis and lower among those who had seen a dentist the prior year. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid enrollees experienced higher OC/OPC incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared with commercially insured adults. Having seen a dentist within the prior year was associated with a lower risk of OC/OPC diagnosis. IMPACT: Expanding Medicaid dental benefits may allow OC/OPC to be diagnosed at earlier stages through regular dental visits.

Oral cancer patients achieve comparable survival at high safety-net burden hospitals.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of hospital safety-net burden and social demographics on the overall survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 48,176 oral cancer patients diagnosed between the years 2004 to 2015 from the National Cancer Database and categorized treatment facilities as no, low, or high safety-net burden hospitals based on the percentage of uninsured or Medicaid patients treated. Using the Kaplan Meier method and multivariate analysis, we examined the effect of hospital safety-net burden, sociodemographic variables, and clinical factors on overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 1269 treatment facilities assessed, the median percentage of uninsured/Medicaid patients treated was 0% at no, 11.6% at low, and 23.5% at high safety-net burden hospitals and median survival was 68.6, 74.8, and 55.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). High safety-net burden hospitals treated more non-white populations (15.4%), lower median household income (<$30,000) (23.2%), and advanced stage cancers (AJCC III/IV) (54.6%). Patients treated at low (aHR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.91-1.04, p = 0.405) and high (aHR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.98-1.13, p = 0.175) safety-net burden hospitals did not experience worse survival outcomes compared to patients treated at no safety-net burden hospitals. CONCLUSION: High safety-net burden hospitals treated more oral cancer patients of lower socioeconomic status and advanced disease. Multivariate analysis showed high safety-net burden hospitals achieved comparable patient survival to lower burden hospitals.

Economic cost of managing patients with oral potentially malignant disorders in Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer of the oral cavity is the leading malignancy amongst males in Sri Lanka, and eighth amongst women. Almost all malignancies are developed from a clinically visible precursor stage called an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD). The objective of this study was to estimate costs of managing patients with OPMD in Sri Lanka for a 12-month period from diagnosis. METHODS: A hospital-based costing study was conducted in Sri Lanka in the years 2016-2017. Three selected treatment centres participated. For societal perspectives, healthcare, household and indirect costs were used. Costs to the healthcare system included clinic visits, diagnostic biopsy, consumables and drug costs. Capital costs included apportioned value of land, buildings, equipment and furniture. Household costs consisted of out-of-pocket expenditure and indirect costs of lost income. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were recruited (39 male and 23 female). The majority had awareness of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Total average cost of managing a single patient with an OPMD for 1 year was SLR 19 547 (US$ 140) which includes a health system cost of SLR 7320 (US$ 52) and household cost of SLR 12 227 (US$ 87). Travel loss and income loss were a substantial burden to patients and their families. CONCLUSIONS: Managing patients with an OPMD, even with annual monitoring, is less costly than managing patients with oral cancer. Out-of-pocket costs are very high, and these could be reduced by revising the National Management Guidelines to allow care closer to home.

Fluorescent spectroscopic assessment before and after radiation treatment in oral cavity cancer and its clinical correlation.

BACKGROUND: Biochemical changes in irradiated malignant tissue lead to altered autofluorophores status which should be different for cancerous tissue (residual/recurrence) and irradiated normal tissue. If this irradiated tissue is examined through fluorescent spectroscopy, we can find the spectroscopic changes occurring after the completion of treatment which can be helpful in evaluating treatment response. METHODS: Punch biopsy sample was examined through fluorescent spectroscopy in oral cavity cancer patients before and after definitive radiation treatment. The change in spectroscopic pattern before and after radiation treatment was recorded and assessed. RESULTS: Final analysis was done in 36 samples. In irradiated tissue, it has been observed that there was increase in the intensity of collagen fluorescence. It was found that the Half width half maximum (HWHM) is more in case of preirradiated sample. The decrease in the HWHM in case of irradiated sample shows the decrease in the number of cells (cell density as compared to that in preirradiated sample). These spectral findings are well-explained pathophysiologically and clinically as amount of collagen are increased in irradiated tissues due to loss of cancerous cells and regeneration of collagen cross-links (fibrosis) and reproduction of normal tissue as a response to radiation treatment. CONCLUSION: After thorough study in a large number of samples, we may be able in the future to grade the alteration in fluorescence of collagen obtained after radiation treatment in terms of complete, partial, or no response.

Epidemiological Assessment of Oral Cancer Burden in Pakistan.

Oral cancer ranks first among males and is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in Pakistan. We studied the epidemiology and risk factors associated with this cancer. The main risk factors in the Pakistani population include the usage of chewable and non-chewable tobacco, areca nut, betel leaf, poor dental hygiene practices, oncogenic viral infections, and genetic predispositions. The impact of socioeconomic status and the available health resources on the management of oral cancer is also discussed. It is concluded that being a low-middle economy efforts should be primarily focused on awareness for early screening, diagnosis, and prevention strategies.

The jaw-dropping costs of oral cavity cancer malpractice.

BACKGROUND: Medical litigation is different than it was 20 years ago due to changes in health care. This study provides an updated analysis of oral cavity malpractice litigation from the past two decades (2000-2010 and 2011-2019). METHODS: Verdict reviews from the Westlaw database were analyzed from January 2000 to August 2019. Data were collected and analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. RESULTS: Sixty-five lawsuits were evaluated across 24 states. Failure to diagnose was the most common allegation in both decades. Adjusting for inflation, the average amount awarded from 2000 to 2010 was $1 721 068 and $3 925 504 from 2011 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant rise in allegations of failure to biopsy and failure to refer (p < 0.05). In addition, while award amounts appear different between decades, the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.248). Education should focus on early diagnosis, biopsy, and referral to physicians who routinely care for this patient population.

Provider cost of treating oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer in Malaysian public hospitals.

Oral cancer has been recognized as a significant challenge to healthcare. In Malaysia, numerous patients frequently present with later stages of cancers to the highly subsidized public healthcare facilities. Such a trend contributes to a substantial social and economic burden. This study aims to determine the cost of treating oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and oral cancer from a public healthcare provider's perspective. Medical records from two tertiary public hospitals were systematically abstracted to identify events and resources consumed retrospectively from August 2019 to January 2020. The cost accrued was used to estimate annual initial and maintenance costs via two different methods- inverse probability weighting (IPW) and unweighted average. A total of 86 OPMD and 148 oral cancer cases were included. The initial phase mean unadjusted cost was USD 2,861 (SD = 2,548) in OPMD and USD 38,762 (SD = 12,770) for the treatment of cancer. Further annual estimate of initial phase cost based on IPW method for OPMD, early and late-stage cancer was USD 3,561 (SD = 4,154), USD 32,530 (SD = 12,658) and USD 44,304 (SD = 16,240) respectively. Overall cost of late-stage cancer was significantly higher than early-stage by USD 11,740; 95% CI [6,853 to 16,695]; p< 0.001. Higher surgical care and personnel cost predominantly contributed to the larger expenditure. In contrast, no significant difference was identified between both cancer stages in the maintenance phase, USD 700; 95% CI [-1,142 to 2,541]; p = 0.457. A crude comparison of IPW estimate with unweighted average displayed a significant difference in the initial phase, with the latter being continuously higher across all groups. IPW method was shown to be able to use data more efficiently by adjusting cost according to survival and follow-up. While cost is not a primary consideration in treatment recommendations, our analysis demonstrates the potential economic benefit of investing in preventive medicine and early detection.

A preliminary assessment of guideline adherence and clinical variation in oral cancer treatment: a MarketScan database study.

BACKGROUND: To assess variations in adherence to guideline-recommended processes of care for oral cavity cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective study using a U.S. healthcare research database (MarketScan). Index diagnoses were considered from 2010 to 2012 with follow-up from 2013 to 2014. Diagnostic and procedure codes were utilized to identify oral cavity patients with a defined treatment modality. Compliance with guideline-recommended processes of care, which included pre-treatment imaging, thyroid-function testing (TFTs), multidisciplinary consultation and gastrostomy-tube insertion rates, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2752 patients were identified. Surgery alone was the most common treatment (60.8%), followed by surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20.4%) and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (18.8%). Head/neck and chest imaging were obtained in 60% and 62.5% of patients respectively. Significant geographical differences in head and neck imaging were observed between North-central (64%), South (58.4%) and West (56.1%) regions (p = 0.026). Differences in chest imaging were also present between North-east (65%) and West (56.8%; p = 0.007). TFTs were obtained in 54.4% of the patients after radiation treatment, and 18.6% of patients had multidisciplinary consultation during the 6 months before and 3 months after initiation of treatment. During the year after treatment initiation, 21.2% of patients underwent G-tube placement, with significantly higher rates in patients receiving triple modality treatment (58%) when compared to surgery plus radiation (27%) and surgery alone (15%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adherence to evidence-based practices was low based on the database coding. These data suggest a potential to improve adherence and increase the routine use of practices delineated in national clinical practice guidelines. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study reflects a suboptimal adherence to guidelines based on the database employed. This study should be considered by healthcare providers and efforts should be maximized to follow the processes of care which have proven to impact on patient's outcomes.

Butyrylcholinesterase: An economical marker of disease activity in oral squamous cell carcinoma before and after therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Biomarkers which can predict disease progression and serve as prognostic indicators are necessary for better management of oral cancer. Studies have shown that Cholinesterase plays an important role in cellular proliferation, differentiation and may have a possible involvement in tumor growth. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The present study is aimed to determine the utility of serum Butyrylcholinesterase (BChe) levels as a marker for progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in relation to the grade of the tumor and to determine if any variation occurred in the levels of BChe before and after therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients were included in the study and divided into two groups as Group A-30 patients (healthy individuals) and Group B-90 cases of histopathologically diagnosed OSCC. The blood sample was collected before surgery, re-collected after the completion of radiotherapy (i.e., 3 and 6 months postsurgery) and analyzed biochemically for the concentration of BCh. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test, ANOVA, and post hoc test (Bonferroni) were used for determining the statistical significance. RESULTS: BChe levels were lower in OSCC (2940.32-1405.50 u/l when compared with controls (11149.60-11243.07 unit/l) and this difference was statistically significant. Postoperatively at 3 months, the serum BChe levels of OSCC patients increased almost two-fold compared to the preoperative values, and this difference was also statistically significant (P = 0.000) After 6 months, these levels further increased but did not reach those of controls. CONCLUSION: BChe can be used as an inexpensive, easy to use, noninvasive biomarker for the evaluation of disease-free survival in OSCC patients.

Development and evaluation of a computerized clinical outcome assessment tool for head and neck cancer patients.

Paper-based clinical outcome data collection methods have practical limitations when used in clinical settings, as the data are often not summarized in time to facilitate patient-physician communications and therefore cannot be used in clinical decision making. This study aimed to develop a computerized clinical outcome assessment tool (COAT) and evaluate its acceptability, feasibility, and potential clinical applications during clinical encounters for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).The traditional Chinese (TChi) character version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) questionnaire was first transcribed and implemented into a touch-screen computerized administration and reporting system (COAT-HNC for short). Each HNC patient was invited to complete the COAT-HNC during their scheduled clinic visits as part of their clinical care. Upon completion, a structured summary report was generated, and subsequently used for treatment evaluation and planning.A cohort of 385 HNC patients were enrolled. Each scale of the computerized TChi FACT-H&N questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach coefficient alpha ranging from 0.74 to 0.90. The touch-screen-based and audio-capable COAT-HNC was reported to be easy to use. Patients and physicians were able to utilize the summary report during their clinical encounters to discuss treatment progress and to plan care.It is practically feasible to design, develop, and implement the COAT-HNC system in routine HNC care. The COAT-HNC has the potential to become a valuable tool for data collection and management of clinical outcomes, and appears useful for HNC patients. However, larger studies to demonstrate its clinical usefulness are still needed.

Abordagem dos cirurgiões-dentistas da Estratégia Saúde da Família sobre o câncer bucal / Analysis of the dental surgeon approach of the Familt Health Strategy on the oral cancer

Objetivo: este estudo busca analisar a atuação dos cirurgiões-dentistas da rede pública de saúde acerca do câncer bucal. Método: trata-se de um estudo transversal no qual foram entrevistados 217 dentistas. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de um questionário estruturado, enviado via e-mail, pelo Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio Grande do Norte. Resultados: um terço dos profissionais relatou ser capaz de realizar biópsias e citologia esfoliativa, mas apenas 15,2% das unidades de saúde possuíam condições materiais para fazê-las. Cerca de 85% dos cirurgiões-dentistas possuíam o conhecimento básico sobre o câncer bucal e 66,8% realizavam ações educativas-preventivas. Conclusão: embora a maioria dos cirurgiões-dentistas tivessem conhecimento adequado para realizar o diagnóstico bucal, a maioria não era capaz de realizar procedimentos cirúrgicos com finalidade diagnóstica. A realização desse exame durante a atenção primária é perfeitamente possível, por necessitar de baixa complexidade de equipamentos, e sua eficácia no diagnóstico permite a detecção precoce e o início do tratamento em estágios iniciais da doença, podendo reduzir as taxas de mortalidade por câncer bucal.(AU)

Objective: this study sought to analyze the performance of dental surgeons in the public health network regarding oral cancer. Method: this is a cross-sectional study in which 217 dentists were interviewed. Data collection was conducted through a structured questionnaire sent via e-mail, by the Regional Council of Dentistry of Rio Grande do Norte. Results: one third of the professionals reported being able to perform biopsies and exfoliative cytology, but only 15.2% of the Health Units had material conditions to carry them out. About 85% of dental surgeons had basic knowledge about oral cancer, and 66.8% performed educational- preventive actions. Conclusion: although most dental surgeons had adequate knowledge to perform the oral diagnosis, most of them were not able to perform surgical procedures for diagnostic purposes. The performance of this exam in primary care is perfectly possible because it requires low equipment complexity, and its effectiveness in diagnosis allows for early detection and initiation of treatment in the early stages of the disease, which can reduce oral cancer mortality rates.(AU)

Nonsurgical management of resectable oral cavity cancer in the wake of COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is the preferred treatment modality for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, due to limited resources, re-assessment of treatment paradigms in the wake of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is urgently required. In this rapid review, we described contemporary oncological outcomes for OSCC using non-surgical modalities. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for articles published between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2020 on MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies were included if they contained patients with OSCC treated with either neoadjuvant, induction, or definitive radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination thereof, and an outcome of overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 36 articles were included. Definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were the focus of 18 articles and neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were the focus of the other 18 articles. In early stage OSCC, definitive radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, was associated with a significantly increased hazard of death compared to definitive surgery (HR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.56-3.67, I2: 63%). The hazard of death was non-significantly increased with definitive chemoradiotherapy in studies excluding early disease (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 0.85-4.64, I2: 84%). Two recent randomized control trials have been conducted, demonstrating no survival advantage to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that primary radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are inferior to surgical management for OSCC. Strategies for surgical delay warranting consideration are sparse, but may include several neoadjuvant regimens, recognizing these regimens may not offer a survival benefit over definitive surgery alone.