A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with hematological malignancies are likely to develop hypogammaglobulinemia. Immunoglobulin (Ig) is commonly given to prevent infections, but its overall costs and cost-effectiveness are unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to assess the evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of Ig, administered intravenously (IVIg) or subcutaneously (SCIg), in adults with hematological malignancies. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, and only two economic evaluations were identified; one cost-utility analysis (CUA) of IVIg versus no Ig, and another comparing IVIg with SCIg. The quality of the evidence was low. Compared to no treatment, Ig reduced hospitalization rates. One study reported no significant change in hospitalizations following a program to reduce IVIg use, and an observational study comparing IVIg with SCIg suggested that there were more hospitalizations with SCIg but lower overall costs per patient. The CUA comparing IVIg versus no Ig suggested that IVIg treatment was not cost-effective, and the other CUA comparing IVIg to SCIg found that home-based SCIg was more cost-effective than IVIg, but both studies had serious limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Our review highlighted key gaps in the literature: the cost-effectiveness of Ig in patients with hematological malignancies is very uncertain. Despite increasing Ig use worldwide, there are limited data regarding the total direct and indirect costs of treatment, and the optimal use of Ig and downstream implications for healthcare resource use and costs remain unclear. Given the paucity of evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of Ig treatment in this population, further health economic research is warranted.

Risk stratification model for the pharmaceutical care of oncology patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms. / [Artículo traducido] Modelo de estratificación de riesgo de atención farmacéutica para pacientes oncológicos con neoplasias sólidas o hematológicas.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop of a risk stratification model for the pharmaceutical care (PC) of patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms who required antineoplastic agents or supportive treatments. METHOD: The risk stratification model was collaboratively developed by oncology pharmacists from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH). It underwent refinement through three workshops and a pilot study. Variables were defined, grouped into four dimensions, and assigned relative weights. The pilot study collected and analyzed data from participating centers to determine priority levels and evaluate variable contributions. The study followed the Kaiser Permanente pyramid model, categorizing patients into three priority levels: Priority 1 (intensive PC, 90th percentile), Priority 2 (60th-90th percentiles), and Priority 3 (60th percentile). Cut-off points were determined based on this stratification. Participating centers recorded variables in an Excel sheet, calculating mean weight scores for each priority level and the total risk score. RESULTS: The participants agreed to complete a questionnaire that comprised 22 variables grouped into 4 dimensions: demographic (maximum score =11); social and health variables and cognitive and functional status (maximum = 19); clinical and health services utilization (maximum = 25); and treatment-related (maximum = 41). From the results of applying the model to the 199 patients enrolled, the cutoff points for categorization were 28 or more points for priority 1, 16 to 27 points for priority 2 and less than 16 for priority 3; more than 80% of the total score was based on the dimensions of 'clinical and health services utilization' and 'treatment-related'. Interventions based on the pharmaceutical care model were recommended for patients with solid or hematological neoplasms, according to their prioritization level. CONCLUSION: This stratification model enables the identification of cancer patients requiring a higher level of pharmaceutical care and facilitates the adjustment of care capacity. Validation of the model in a representative population is necessary to establish its effectiveness.

Identification and assessment of new PIM2 inhibitors for treating hematologic cancers: A combined approach of energy-based virtual screening and machine learning evaluation.

PIM2, part of the PIM kinase family along with PIM1 and PIM3, is often overexpressed in hematologic cancers, fueling tumor growth. Despite its significance, there are no approved drugs targeting it. In response to this challenge, we devised a thorough virtual screening workflow for discovering novel PIM2 inhibitors. Our process includes molecular docking and diverse scoring methods like molecular mechanics generalized born surface area, XGBOOST, and DeepDock to rank potential inhibitors by binding affinities and interaction potential. Ten compounds were selected and subjected to an adequate evaluation of their biological activity. Compound 2 emerged as the most potent inhibitor with an IC50 of approximately 135.7 nM. It also displayed significant activity against various hematological cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Molecular dynamics simulations elucidated the binding mode of compound 2 with PIM2, offering insights for drug development. These results highlight the reliability and efficacy of our virtual screening workflow, promising new drugs for hematologic cancers, notably ALCL.

Hematologic Malignancy Episodes Exceed Target Price in Oncology Care Model.

The current study evaluated whether total cost of care (TCOC) and target price were aligned in Oncology Care Model (OCM) hematologic malignancy episodes and identified factors associated with episodes exceeding target price. Hematologic malignancy episodes from OCM performance period 1-4 reconciliation reports were identified from a large academic medical center. Of the 516 hematologic malignancies episodes included in the analysis, 283 (54.8%) exceeded the target price. Episode characteristics found to be statistically significantly associated with exceeding target price were Medicare Part B drug use and Part D drug use, novel therapy use, home health agency, and >730 days from last chemotherapy. The mean TCOC was $85 374 (± $26 342) for the episodes that exceeded target price while the mean target price was $56 106 (±$16 309). The results found a substantial misalignment between the TCOC and target price for hematologic malignancy episodes, adding to the existing evidence on the lack of adequate adjustment to the OCM target price.

Optimal dosing regimen of biapenem based on population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and Monte Carlo simulation in patients with febrile neutropenia and haematological malignancies.

In the current study, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed for biapenem in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) and haematological malignancies. Through Monte Carlo simulation, optimal administration regimens were suggested based on the developed PPK model. In a prospective, single-centre, open-label study, 174 plasma samples from 120 Chinese patients with FN and haematological malignancies were analysed by chromatography, and PK parameters were analysed by NONMEM. The drug clearance process was influenced by crucial covariates, namely creatinine clearance (CLCR) and concomitant posaconazole (POS). The ultimate PPK model was as follows: CL (L/h)=29.81 × (CLCR/121.38)0.806 × (1-POS × 0.297); volume of distribution (L)=114. For the target of ≥40% fT>minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (duration that the plasma level exceeds the MIC of the causative pathogen) and achieving the probability of target attainment ≥90%, the PK/pharmacodynamic breakpoint was 2 mg/L for the 2.4 g/day dosing regimen consisting of 600 mg q6h and 800 mg q8h. The breakpoint was 1 mg/L for the 1.2 g/day dosing regimen consisting of 300 mg q6h and 600 mg q12h. Empirical therapy would benefit from utilizing higher dosages and extended infusion durations. Therefore, it is suggested that patients with symptoms that are strongly suggestive of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii infection may be suitable for combined treatment with other antibacterial drugs.

Development of a decision tree for the pharmacy-led consultation of elderly patients with haematological malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with haematological malignancies are a population at risk of iatrogenic for whom these activities could optimize therapeutic management. However, the limitation of human resources requires optimization of the process in order to improve the efficiency of pharmaceutical activities. The objective was to build a decision tree to optimize the pharmaceutical consultation in these population within a multidisciplinary team in haematology. METHOD: Pharmaceutical consultations were proposed to elderly subjects with haematological malignancies followed up in a haematology day hospitalization at the University Hospital of Limoges. Risk factors for prescribing risky drugs in this population were determined by logistic regression models. A decision tree was constructed based on these results and by agreement between pharmacist, geriatrician and hematologist. RESULTS: Female gender (aOR[CI95%] = 1.71 [1.14-2.57]), polypharmacy (aOR[CI95%] = 1.89 [1.14-3.13]), hyper-polypharmacy (aOR[CI95%] = 5.73 [3.03-10.84]) and moderate cholinergic load (aOR[CI95%] = 2.15 [1.04-4.45]) were risk factors for the prescription of inappropriate medicine. Female gender (aOR[CI95%] = 1.55 [1.02-2.35]) and hyper-polypharmacy (aOR[CI95%] = 6.19 [1-1.28]) were risk factors for prescribing anticholinergic drugs or anticoagulants; in contrast, frailty status was a protective factor for prescribing anticholinergics (aOR[CI95%] = 0.51 [0.33-0.81]). Prioritization of pharmaceutical consultations is based on frailty status, prescription of a target drug and polypharmacy. DISCUSSION: Pharmaceutical consultations during the day hospitalization of elderly subjects with hematological diseases allow to propose therapeutic optimizations. The prioritization proposed in our study would increase the efficiency of pharmaceutical activities in order to improve quality and safety throughout the care pathway of these patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rhTPO and rhIL-11 in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in hematological tumors based on real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common adverse reaction to chemotherapy that can lead to treatment delay, platelet transfusion, thereby increasing treatment costs, reducing chemotherapy effectiveness and affecting prognosis. Based on real-world data, this study analyzed the safety, efficacy, and economic of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) in the treatment of CIT in hematological tumors from the perspective of the health care system. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of hematological tumor patients treated with rhTPO and rhIL-11 due to thrombocytopenia caused by chemotherapy. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance the baseline information of the two groups and they were further stratified according to the degree of thrombocytopenia (grade I-II and grade III-IV). The platelet compliance rate at 2 weeks of treatment was used as the efficacy evaluation index, and the cost-effectiveness method was used to evaluate the economic value of the two drugs in the treatment of thrombocytopenia based on drug effectiveness. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,571 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 476 patients were included after 1:1 PSM. For patients with grade I-II thrombocytopenia, no significant difference in the platelet compliance rate was found between the two groups after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment. The platelet compliance rate in the rhTPO group was higher than that in the rhIL-11 group for patients with grade III-IV thrombocytopenia. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the rhTPO and rhIL-11 groups was 226,615.8. The ICER value was sensitive to the platelet compliance rate of the two groups, the cost of rhTPO, the cost of platelet transfusion in the rhTPO group. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that when willingness to pay was less than approximately 220,000 yuan, rhIL-11 economy presented 100% better than that of rhTPO. CONCLUSIONS: In CIT treatment for hematological tumors, rhTPO yielded a higher platelet compliance rate than rhIL-11 treatment, especially for patients with grade III-IV thrombocytopenia. However, whether rhTPO has economic advantages still requires further exploration.

The Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme during active-phase treatment in patients with haematological malignancies: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

CONTEXT: The need for patient navigator is growing, and there is a lack of cost evaluation, especially during survivorship. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme in patients with haematological malignancies (HM). DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis of the AMA programme was performed compared to a simulated control arm. SETTING: An interventional, single-arm and prospective study was conducted in a French reference haematology-oncology centre between 2016 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients were enrolled with histologically documented malignant haematology, during their active therapy phase, and treated either by intravenous chemotherapy or oral therapy. METHODS: An extrapolation of the effectiveness was derived from a similar nurse monitoring programme (CAPRI study). Cost effectiveness of the programme was evaluated through adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 avoided in different populations. RESULTS: Included patient (n = 797) from the AMA programme were followed during 125 days (IQR: 0-181), and adverse events (Grade 3/4) were observed in 10.1% of patients versus 13.4% in the simulated control arm. The overall cost of AE avoided was estimated to €81,113, leading to an ICER of €864. CONCLUSION: The AMA programme was shown to be cost-effective compared to a simulated control arm with no intervention.

Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China.

Background: Posaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in hematological-malignancy patients at high risk for IFIs from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Methods: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were built using published data to estimate the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension and first-generation triazoles. Regimens with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lower than the threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) were considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. The regional imbalance of economic development and the tablet formulation of posaconazole were considered in the scenario analyses. Results: In the base-case analysis, posaconazole oral suspension provided an additional 0.109 QALYs at an incremental cost of $954.7, yielding an ICER of $8,784.4/QALY, below the national WTP threshold of $31,315/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust. Scenario analyses showed that the base-case ICER was consistently below the WTP thresholds of all 31 Chinese provinces, with the likelihood of posaconazole being cost-effectiveness ranging from 78.1 to 99.0%. When the posaconazole oral suspension was replaced by the tablet formulation, the ICER increased to $29,214.1/QALY, still below the national WTP threshold and WTP thresholds of 12 provinces. Conclusions: Posaconazole oral suspension is a highly cost-effective regimen for preventing IFI in high-risk hematological-malignancy patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Posaconazole tablets may also be considered in some high-income regions of China.

Assessment of Patient-Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen Genomic Loss at Relapse After Antithymocyte Globulin-Based T-Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

Importance: Patient-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genomic loss (HLA loss) is one of the reputed mechanisms of leukemia immune escape and relapse after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, clinical characteristics and prognosis of this distinct relapse type in the setting of haploidentical HSCT based on antithymocyte globulin (ATG) T-cell-replete conditioning are still unknown, especially for patients with lymphoid leukemia. Objective: To identify the incidence of and patient characteristics associated with HLA loss at hematologic cancer relapse after ATG-based haploidentical HSCT and to assess overall survival after HLA loss at relapse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective and multicenter case series study used data from medical records to identify patients who experienced relapse of hematologic cancer after receipt of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. The study included 788 consecutive patients aged 8 to 70 years with lymphoid or myeloid leukemia who received ATG T-cell-replete haploidentical HSCT at the Zhejiang Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation between May 1, 2012, and May 31, 2021. Exposures: Relapse after ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence, risk factors, and postrelapse overall survival among patients with HLA loss at hematologic cancer relapse after receipt of haploidentical HSCT. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify characteristics associated with the likelihood of HLA loss, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate postrelapse survival. Results: A total of 788 patients who received haploidentical HSCT for hematologic cancer were identified, 180 of whom experienced relapse after HSCT. Of those, 106 evaluable patients (median age, 30.9 years [range, 8.3-64.6 years]; 54 female [50.9%] and 52 male [49.1%]) were screened for HLA loss, which was detected in 54 patients (50.9%). Patients with HLA loss experienced relapse later than those without HLA loss (lymphoid group: median, 323 days [range, 98-2056 days] vs 151 days [range, 57-2544 days]; P = .01; myeloid group: median, 321 days [range, 55-1574 days] vs 223 days [range, 68-546 days]; P = .03). Among patients with lymphoid leukemia, those with minimal residual disease positivity before hematologic relapse (odds ratio [OR], 28.47; 95% CI, 1.99-407.98; P = .01), those with chronic graft-vs-host disease (OR, 27.68; 95% CI, 1.40-546.88; P = .03), and those with more than 180 days between HSCT and relapse (OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.32-36.22; P = .02) were more likely to lose unshared HLA at relapse, whereas male patients (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.003-0.32; P = .04) were more likely to preserve their HLA genome at relapse. Patients with myeloid leukemia had different factors associated with HLA loss, including underweight status (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.60; P = .01) and acute graft-vs-host disease (OR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.14-20.53; P = .03). The receipt of preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion among patients with minimal residual disease recurrence did not postpone hematologic cancer relapse in those with HLA loss (median, 322 days [range, 204-1030 days]) compared with no receipt of donor lymphocyte infusion (median, 340 days [range, 215 days to not available]; P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, HLA loss at leukemia relapse occurred frequently after receipt of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. The identification of risk factors associated with HLA loss would help to prompt screening, avoid potentially harmful infusions of donor T cells, and develop alternative therapeutic strategies.

Enrollment of Black Participants in Pivotal Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignant Neoplasms.

Importance: Disparities that affect Black persons with various hematological malignant neoplasms are substantial, yet little is known about disparities related to the use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Objective: To examine the enrollment of Black participants in clinical trials that resulted in a subsequent FDA approval of CAR-T products in hematological malignant neoplasms. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available data on drug products and demographic subgroups from Drugs@fda in the period of August 2017 to May 2021. Data analysis included patients with large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma who were enrolled into 7 clinical trials that investigated various CAR-T products. The study was conducted from July 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies of participation of Black participants were calculated with adjustment for disease prevalence. Results: Of the 1057 enrolled patients included in the study, CAR-T products were given to 746 patients (71%), and efficacy was reported for 729 enrolled patients (69%) across all the approved CAR-T products and indications. Most patients (1015 patients [96%]) were enrolled in the US. Black participants were included in the racial category other in the study that supported tisagenlecleucel approval in acute lymphoblastic leukemia; otherwise, their enrollment was specified either in the study publication and/or the demographic subgroup information available under the FDA product labeling information. The number of Black participants who received the CAR-T product and had reported efficacy varied between studies (range, 1-12 participants [2%-5%]). Adjusted prevalence measures showed the lowest participation to prevalence ratio of 0.2 for multiple myeloma and 0.6 for large B cell lymphoma. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that there are substantial disparities affecting Black patients across all approved CAR-T products used to treat hematological malignant neoplasms with otherwise limited effective treatment options. The study findings might aid policy discussions regarding the immediate need of regulations that enforce certain thresholds of Black patients' enrollment before granting FDA approval.

Reaching beyond maximum grade: progress and future directions for modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies.

Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades. Targeted agents, immune and cellular therapies, and combination regimens have adverse event profiles distinct from conventional finite cytotoxic chemotherapies. In 2018, a Commission comprising patient advocates, clinicians, clinical investigators, regulators, biostatisticians, and pharmacists representing a broad range of academic and clinical cancer expertise examined issues of adverse event evaluation in the context of both newer and existing therapies for haematological cancers. The Commission proposed immediate actions and long-term solutions in the current processes in adverse event assessment, patient-reported outcomes in haematological malignancies, toxicities in cellular therapies, long-term toxicity and survivorship in haematological malignancies, issues in regulatory approval from an international perspective, and toxicity reporting in haematological malignancies and the real-world setting. In this follow-up report, the Commission describes progress that has been made in these areas since the initial report.

Prognostic Value of Palliative Prognostic Index for Hospitalized Patients With End-of-Life Hematologic Malignancies in a Japanese University Hospital.

PURPOSE: Uncertainty of prognosis is one reason patients with hematologic malignancies receive aggressive therapy near end of life more often than those with advanced solid tumors. It is unknown whether end-of-life prognosis prediction models are useful for patients with hematologic malignancies, especially hospitalized patients receiving chemotherapy, because most prognostic models were developed for patients with solid tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) for end-of-life patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 143 patients who became resistant to standard chemotherapy and died of disease progression in our university hospital hematology ward between May 2015 and November 2019. Patients were classified according to PPI scores (groups: A, PPI ≤ 2.0; B, 2.0 < PPI ≤ 4.0; and C, PPI > 4.0) based on their clinical charts at admission. The median overall survival for each patient (95% confidence interval) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were used to determine significant differences between survival curves. RESULTS: Median patient age was 76 years (range: 39-92 years), and 59% were men. Median overall survival times in the PPI groups A, B, and C were 58 days, 36 days, and 10 days, respectively. Statistically significant differences in survival time were observed between the groups (P < .01); prediction accuracy was similar to that for patients with different diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The usefulness of PPI was validated for near-end-of-life hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies.

Decision-tree derivation and external validation of a new clinical decision rule (DISCERN-FN) to predict the risk of severe infection during febrile neutropenia in children treated for cancer.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, international guidelines proposed new management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer, adapted to the risk of severe infection by clinical decision rules (CDRs). Until now, none of the proposed CDRs has performed well enough in high-income countries for use in clinical practice. Our study aimed to build and validate a new CDR (DISCERN-FN) to predict the risk of severe infection in children with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: We did two prospective studies. First, a prospective derivation study included all episodes of febrile neutropenia in children (aged <18 years) with a cancer diagnosis and receiving treatment for it who were admitted for an episode of febrile neutropenia, excluding patients already treated with antibiotics for this episode, febrile neutropenia not induced by chemotherapy, those receiving palliative care, and those with a stem cell allograft for less than 1 year, from April 1, 2007, to Dec 31, 2011 from two paediatric cancer centres in France. We collected the children's medical history, and clinical and laboratory data, and analysed their associations with severe infection. Sipina software was used to derive the CDR as a decision tree. Second, a prospective, national, external validation study was done in 23 centres from Jan 1, 2012, to May 31, 2016. The primary outcome was severe infection, defined by bacteraemia, a positive bacterial culture from a usually sterile site, a local infection with a high potential for extension, or an invasive fungal infection. The CDR was applied a posteriori to all episodes to evaluate its sensitivity, specificity, and negative likelihood ratio. FINDINGS: The derivation set included 539 febrile neutropenia episodes (270 episodes in patients with blood cancer [median age 7·5 years, IQR 3·7-11·2; 158 (59 %) boys and 112 (41%) girls] and 269 in patients with solid tumours [median age 6·6 years, IQR 2·9-14·2; 140 (52 %) boys and 129 (48%) girls]). Significant variables introduced into the decision tree were cancer type (solid tumour vs blood cancer), age, high-risk chemotherapy, level of fever, C-reactive protein concentration (at 24-48 h after admission), and leucocyte and platelet counts and procalcitonin (at admission and at 24-48 h after admission). For the derivation set, the CDR sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 93-100), its specificity 56% (51-61), and the negative likelihood ratio 0·04 (0·01-0·15). 1806 febrile neutropenia episodes were analysed in the validation set (mean age 8·1 years [SD 4·8], 1014 (56%) boys and 792 (44%) girls), of which 332 (18%, 95% CI 17-20) were linked with severe infection. For the validation set, the CDR had a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91-97), a specificity of 38% (36-41), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0·13 (0·08-0·21). Our CDR reduced the risk of severe infection to a post-test probability of 0·8% (95% CI 0·2-2·9) in the derivation set and 2·4% (1·5-3·9) in the validation set. The validation study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03434795. INTERPRETATION: The use of our CDR substantially reduced the risk of severe infection after testing in both the derivation and validation groups, which suggests that this CDR would improve clinical practice enough to be introduced in appropriate settings. FUNDING: Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.

Cost-effectiveness and drug wastage of immunotherapeutic agents for hematologic malignancies: a systematic review.

Introduction: Novel immunotherapeutic agents (e.g. monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers) as treatment options for hematologic malignancies continue to emerge. These agents have been used as the standard of care in specific disease states and are associated with high costs. Value assessment of these therapies is of critical importance for coverage and reimbursement decision-making.Areas covered: We identified 15 immunotherapeutic agents through the U.S. FDA approvals for hematologic malignancies until 2018 and systematically reviewed related cost-effectiveness studies. Additionally, we examined whether drug wastage was accounted for in these studies.Expert opinion: We reviewed 51 studies for 14 identified immunotherapeutic agents that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Three studies were observational-based, one study was model-based and incorporated observational data. The remaining studies were model-based with the majority of the model parameters extracted from randomized control trials (RCTs). Among 43 model-based economic evaluations, 13 studies accounted for drug wastage. Most of the studies showed favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of immunotherapeutic agents-containing regimens when compared with no immunotherapeutic agents-containing regimens. Alemtuzumab, brentuximab vedotin, and daratumumab were not considered cost-effective across all the studies. Further investigations are warranted to establish the value of recent immunotherapeutic agents for hematologic malignancies.

Healthcare resource utilization and economic burden of antifungal management in patients with hematologic malignancy in Japan: a retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment patterns of real-world antifungal management of patients at high risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI) and evaluate healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with antifungal management of IFIs in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study extracted data from a hospital-based claims database for patients in Japan who either (a) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), or (b) were hospitalized with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and received chemotherapy during the study period of January 2010 to January 2019. RESULTS: 863 patients were included in the allo-HSCT cohort and 4498 patients were included in the AML/MDS cohort. In the allo-HSCT cohort, 91% received more than one antifungal drug during the index hospitalization. In the AML/MDS cohort, approximately 50% received more than one antifungal drug during the index hospitalization. For both the allo-HSCT and AML/MDS cohorts, about 90% of the total cost was attributed to inpatient costs. Of note, both the total cost (the total inpatient and outpatient cost) and the index hospitalization costs were higher in patients treated with multiple antifungal drugs than in those treated with a single antifungal drug during the index hospitalization. Despite being at high IFI risk, 12% of the patients in the AML/MDS cohort did not receive antifungal drugs during the index hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with hematologic malignancy and high IFI risk underwent complicated antifungal management requiring use of multiple drugs, and accounted for high healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Assessment and Management of Cardiotoxicity in Hematologic Malignancies.

With the increasing overall survival of cancer patients due to recent discoveries in oncology, the incidence of side effects is also rising, and along with secondary malignancies, cardiotoxicity is one of the most concerning side effects, affecting the quality of life of cancer survivors. There are two types of cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy; the first one is acute, life-threatening but, fortunately, in most of the cases, reversible; and the second one is with late onset and mostly irreversible. The most studied drugs associated with cardiotoxicity are anthracyclines, but many new agents have demonstrated unexpected cardiotoxic effect, including those currently used in multiple myeloma treatment (proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents), tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and some forms of acute leukemia, and immune checkpoint inhibitors recently introduced in treatment of refractory lymphoma patients. To prevent irreversible myocardial damage, early recognition of cardiac toxicity is mandatory. Traditional methods like echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging are capable of detecting structural and functional changings, but unable to detect early myocardial damage; therefore, more sensible biomarkers like troponins and natriuretic peptides have to be introduced into the current practice. Baseline assessment of patients allows the identification of those with high risk for cardiotoxicity, while monitoring during and after treatment is important for early detection of cardiotoxicity and prompt intervention.

Evaluation and optimization of a clinical pharmacist driven transitions of care model for malignant hematology.

PURPOSE: To implement and optimize a pilot transitions of care model for scheduled chemotherapy admissions in patients with hematologic malignancies at our institution.Methodology: We utilized the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) quality improvement technique to prospectively measure success of interventions related to improving transitions of care processes that occurred in multiple stages including development of standardized operating procedures, electronic medical record documentation, and education to the malignant hematology multidisciplinary group. Chart review was performed retrospectively for at least nine patients per PDSA cycle. Areas of intervention addressed and measured regarding communication between the ambulatory care and acute care settings included: admission purpose, processes related to insurance benefits investigations for specialty medications required in the post-discharge setting, and plan for growth factors, prophylactic antimicrobials, and follow-up.Results and conclusions: We included 28 patients and performed a total of three PDSA cycles demonstrating specific improvements in: communication regarding status of benefits investigations performed for specialty medications prior to admission, resolution of these benefits investigations at various time points, improvement in efficient use of the electronic medical record for chemotherapy orders, and patient instructions for appropriate use of prophylactic antimicrobials. Although improvement was noted initially with prescribing of discharge antiemetics and antimicrobials, regression to baseline was noted with the third PDSA cycle.