Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(5): 721-728, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220041

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to uncover potential areas for cost savings in uterine artery embolization (UAE) using time-driven activity-based costing, the most accurate costing methodology for direct health care system costs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients who underwent outpatient UAE for fibroids or adenomyosis between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Utilization times were captured from electronic health record time stamps and staff interviews using validated techniques. Capacity cost rates were estimated using institutional data and manufacturer proxy prices. Costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing for personnel, equipment, and consumables. Differences in time utilization and costs between procedures by an interventional radiology attending physician only versus an interventional radiology attending physician and trainee were additionally performed. RESULTS: The mean total cost of UAE was $4,267 ± $1,770, the greatest contributor being consumables (51%; $2,162 ± $811), followed by personnel (33%; $1,388 ± $340) and equipment (7%; $309 ± $96). Embolic agents accounted for the greatest proportion of consumable costs, accounting for 51% ($1,273 ± $789), followed by vascular devices (15%; $630 ± $143). The cost of embolic agents was highly variable, driven mainly by the number of vials (range 1-19) of tris-acryl gelatin particles used. Interventional radiology attending physician only cases had significantly lower personnel costs ($1,091 versus $1,425, P = .007) and equipment costs ($268 versus $317, P = .007) compared with interventional radiology attending physician and trainee cases, although there was no significant difference in mean overall costs ($3,640 versus $4,386; P = .061). CONCLUSIONS: Consumables accounted for the majority of total cost of UAE, driven by the cost of embolic agents and vascular devices.


Assuntos
Leiomioma , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Humanos , Feminino , Embolização da Artéria Uterina/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Leiomioma/terapia , Leiomioma/economia , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Radiologia Intervencionista/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/economia , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos , Radiografia Intervencionista/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA