Exploring disparities in surgical recommendations for patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Factors that may drive recommendations for operative intervention for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs) have yet to be extensively studied. The authors investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of patients with primary spinal cord ependymomas and nonependymal gliomas, with the aim of determining the associations between socioeconomic patient characteristics, survival, and recommendations for the resection of primary ISCTs. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried to identify all patients > 18 years of age with ISCTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for variables associated with receiving a surgical recommendation. Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: The authors identified 2325 patients (mean age 49 [SD 16] years; 48.8% female; 67.4% non-Hispanic White, 7.8% non-Hispanic Black, 16.2% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.6% Native American; 56.7% married; 64.4% with household income < $75,000; 73.8% with spinal ependymoma; and 26.2% with nonependymal spinal glioma). Eighty-seven percent of patients received a surgical recommendation. In multivariable models, marriage was associated with higher odds of receiving a surgical recommendation for ependymomas (OR 1.80, p = 0.005). In multivariable models for nonependymal spinal gliomas, older age (OR 0.98, p = 0.001) and increased number of tumors (OR 0.62, p = 0.015) were associated with decreased odds of receiving surgical recommendations. Among ependymomas, marriage (HR 0.59, p = 0.001), younger age (HR 0.93, p < 0.001), female sex (HR 0.43, p = 0.006), and decreased number of tumors (HR 0.56, p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Among nonependymal spinal gliomas, median household income ≥ $75,000 (HR 0.69, p = 0.020) and younger age (HR 0.98, p < 0.001) were associated with improved DSS, while Black race (HR 4.65, p = 0.027) and older age (HR 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with spinal ependymomas and nonependymal spinal gliomas, recommendations for surgery appear to be unaffected by patient sex, race, or income. Survival disparities appear to exist among unmarried, male, Black, and lower-income cohorts. Continued initiatives to identify drivers of disparities while improving health equity in this patient population are needed.

The iterative implementation of a comprehensive enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in all spinal surgery in Korea: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and medical costs between primary spinal tumors and degenerative spinal diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery have focused on patients with degenerative spinal diseases (DSDs), resulting in a lack of evidence for a comprehensive ERAS protocol applicable to patients with primary spine tumors (PSTs) and other spinal diseases. The authors had developed and gradually adopted components of the comprehensive ERAS protocol for all spine surgical procedures from 2003 to 2011, and then the current ERAS protocol was fully implemented in 2012. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and the applicability of the comprehensive ERAS protocol across all spine surgical procedures and to compare outcomes between the PST and DSD groups. METHODS: Adult spine surgical procedures were conducted from 2003 to 2021 at the Seoul National University Hospital Spine Center and data were retrospectively reviewed. The author divided the study periods into the developing ERAS (2003-2011) and post-current ERAS (2012-2021) periods, and outcomes were compared between the two periods. Surgical procedures for metastatic cancer, infection, and trauma were excluded. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to assess the impact of the ERAS protocol on medical costs and clinical outcomes, including length of stay (LOS) and rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection (SSI). Subgroup analyses were conducted on the PST and DSD groups in terms of LOS and medical costs. RESULTS: The study included 7143 surgical procedures, comprising 1494 for PSTs, 5340 for DSDs, and 309 for other spinal diseases. After ERAS protocol implementation, spine surgical procedures showed significant reductions in LOS and medical costs by 22% (p = 0.008) and 22% (p < 0.001), respectively. The DSD group demonstrated a 16% (p < 0.001) reduction in LOS, whereas the PST group achieved a 28% (p < 0.001) reduction, noting a more pronounced LOS reduction in PST surgical procedures (p = 0.003). Medical costs decreased by 23% (p < 0.001) in the DSD group and 12% (p = 0.054) in the PST group, with a larger cost reduction for DSD surgical procedures (p = 0.021). No statistically significant differences were found in the rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI between the developing and post-current ERAS implementation periods (p = 0.65, p = 0.59, and p = 0.52, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive ERAS protocol implementation significantly reduced LOS and medical costs in all spine surgical procedures, while maintaining comparable 30-day readmission, reoperation, and SSI rates. These findings suggest that the ERAS protocol is equally applicable to all spine surgical procedures, with a more pronounced effect on reducing LOS in the PST group and on reducing medical costs in the DSD group.

Surgical Outcomes and Medical Costs Associated with Spinal Cord Tumors: Comparison of Extramedullary and Intramedullary Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the differences in the perioperative data of patients with extramedullary and intramedullary tumors and estimate the impact of surgery on medical costs. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent spinal tumor resection between September 2020 and December 2022. The perioperative medical information and medical costs for individual patients were obtained from their medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with extramedullary spinal cord tumors and 18 with intramedullary spinal cord tumors were included in the study. The 2 groups had no difference in surgery-related or major systemic complications. However, the operation time and the length of hospital stay were significantly longer and activities of daily living at discharge tended to worsen in the intramedullary tumor group compared to those in the extramedullary tumor group. As a result, the discharge outcome was significantly different between the 2 groups. The total medical costs for intramedullary tumors were approximately 1.43 times higher than those for extramedullary tumors. Further, a better functional outcome at discharge can save medical costs, regardless of extramedullary or intramedullary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for intramedullary tumors can be performed with similar perioperative risks as for extramedullary tumors. However, intramedullary tumors are associated with concerns, such as prolonged hospitalization and worsening of activities of daily living at discharge, which ultimately result in higher medical costs.

Performance Assessment of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator performance in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spine disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with spinal metastases may require surgical intervention for cord compression or mechanical instability. The ACS-NSQIP calculator was developed to assist surgeons with estimating 30-day postoperative complications based on patient-specific risk factors and has been validated within several surgical patient populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 148 consecutive patients at our institution who underwent surgery for metastatic spine disease between 2012 and 2022. Our outcomes were 30-day mortality, 30-day major complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Predicted risk, determined by the calculator, was compared with observed outcomes using receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were repeated using individual corpectomy and laminectomy Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to determine procedure-specific accuracy. RESULTS: Based on the ACS-NSQIP calculator, there was good discrimination between observed and predicted 30-day mortality incidence overall (AUC=0.749), as well as in corpectomy cases (AUC=0.745) and laminectomy cases (AUC=0.788). Poor 30-day major complication discrimination was seen in all procedural cohorts, including overall (AUC=0.570), corpectomy (AUC=0.555), and laminectomy (AUC=0.623). The overall median observed LOS was similar to predicted LOS (9 vs. 8.5 d, P =0.125). Observed and predicted LOS were also similar in corpectomy cases (8 vs. 9 d; P =0.937) but not in laminectomy cases (10 vs. 7 d, P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator was found to accurately predict 30-day postoperative mortality but not 30-day major complications. The calculator was also accurate in predicting LOS following corpectomy but not laminectomy. While this tool may be utilized to predict risk short-term mortality in this population, its clinical value for other outcomes is limited.

A current review of spinal meningiomas: epidemiology, clinical presentation and management.

PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, histopathology, molecular biology, and etiology of spinal meningiomas, as well as discuss the clinical presentation, clinical evaluation, and most recent treatment recommendations for these lesions. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar search was performed for studies related to meningiomas of the spine. The terms "meningioma," "spinal meningioma," "spine meningioma," "meningioma of the spine," "benign spinal tumors," and "benign spine tumors," were used to identify relevant studies. All studies, including primary data papers, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, general reviews, case reports, and clinical trials were considered for review. RESULTS: Eighty-four studies were identified in the review. There were 22 studies discussing adverse postoperative outcomes, 21 studies discussing tumor genetics, 19 studies discussing epidemiology and current literature, 9 studies discussing radiation modalities and impact on subsequent tumor development, 5 studies on characteristic imaging findings, 5 studies discussing hormone use/receptor status on tumor development, 2 discussing operative techniques and 1 discussing tumor identification. CONCLUSION: Investigations into spinal meningiomas generally lag behind that of intracranial meningiomas. Recent advancements in the molecular profiling of spinal meningiomas has expanded our understanding of these tumors, increasing our appreciation for their heterogeneity. Continued investigation into the defining characteristics of different spinal meningiomas will aid in treatment planning and prognostication.

Deep Learning for Noninvasive Assessment of H3 K27M Mutation Status in Diffuse Midline Gliomas Using MR Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Determination of H3 K27M mutation in diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is key for prognostic assessment and stratifying patient subgroups for clinical trials. MRI can noninvasively depict morphological and metabolic characteristics of H3 K27M mutant DMG. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) approach to noninvasively predict H3 K27M mutation in DMG using T2-weighted images. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective and prospective. POPULATION: For diffuse midline brain gliomas, 341 patients from Center-1 (27 ± 19 years, 184 males), 42 patients from Center-2 (33 ± 19 years, 27 males) and 35 patients (37 ± 18 years, 24 males). For diffuse spinal cord gliomas, 133 patients from Center-1 (30 ± 15 years, 80 males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5T and 3T, T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging. ASSESSMENT: Conventional radiological features were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists. H3 K27M status was determined by histopathological examination. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate segmentation performance. Classification performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson's Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, two-sample Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the testing cohort, Dice coefficients of tumor segmentation using DL were 0.87 for diffuse midline brain and 0.81 for spinal cord gliomas. In the internal prospective testing dataset, the predictive accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities of H3 K27M mutation status were 92.1%, 98.2%, 82.9% in diffuse midline brain gliomas and 85.4%, 88.9%, 82.6% in spinal cord gliomas. Furthermore, this study showed that the performance generalizes to external institutions, with predictive accuracies of 85.7%-90.5%, sensitivities of 90.9%-96.0%, and specificities of 82.4%-83.3%. DATA CONCLUSION: In this study, an automatic DL framework was developed and validated for accurately predicting H3 K27M mutation using T2-weighted images, which could contribute to the noninvasive determination of H3 K27M status for clinical decision-making. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Toward digital histopathological assessment in surgery for central nervous system tumors using stimulated Raman histology.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neuropathological assessment with conventional frozen sections supports the neurosurgeon in optimizing the surgical strategy. However, preparation and review of frozen sections can take as long as 45 minutes. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) was introduced as a novel technique to provide rapid high-resolution digital images of unprocessed tissue samples directly in the operating room that are comparable to conventional histopathological images. Additionally, SRH images are simultaneously and easily accessible for neuropathological judgment. Recently, the first study showed promising results regarding the accuracy and feasibility of SRH compared with conventional histopathology. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare SRH with conventional H&E images and frozen sections in a large cohort of patients with different suspected central nervous system (CNS) tumors. METHODS: The authors included patients who underwent resection or stereotactic biopsy of suspected CNS neoplasm, including brain and spinal tumors. Intraoperatively, tissue samples were safely collected and SRH analysis was performed directly in the operating room. To enable optimal comparison of SRH with H&E images and frozen sections, the authors created a digital databank that included images obtained with all 3 imaging modalities. Subsequently, 2 neuropathologists investigated the diagnostic accuracy, tumor cellularity, and presence of diagnostic histopathological characteristics (score 0 [not present] through 3 [excellent]) determined with SRH images and compared these data to those of H&E images and frozen sections, if available. RESULTS: In total, 94 patients with various suspected CNS tumors were included, and the application of SRH directly in the operating room was feasible in all cases. The diagnostic accuracy based on SRH images was 99% when compared with the final histopathological diagnosis based on H&E images. Additionally, the same histopathological diagnosis was established in all SRH images (100%) when compared with that of the corresponding frozen sections. Moreover, the authors found a statistically significant correlation in tumor cellularity between SRH images and corresponding H&E images (p < 0.0005 and R = 0.867, Pearson correlation coefficient). Finally, excellent (score 3) or good (2) accordance between diagnostic histopathological characteristics and H&E images was present in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective analysis demonstrate the near-perfect diagnostic accuracy and capability of visualizing relevant histopathological characteristics with SRH compared with conventional H&E staining and frozen sections. Therefore, digital SRH histopathology seems especially useful for rapid intraoperative investigation to confirm the presence of diagnostic tumor tissue and the precise tumor entity, as well as to rapidly analyze multiple tissue biopsies from the suspected tumor margin. A real-time analysis comparing SRH images and conventional histological images at the time of surgery should be performed as the next step in future studies.

Assessment of the Concordance Rate between Intraoperative Pathological Diagnosis and the Final Pathological Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Tumors.

The intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IPD) plays an important role in determining the optimal surgical treatment for spinal cord tumors. The final pathological diagnosis (FPD) is sometimes different from the IPD. Here, we sought to identify the accuracy of the IPD of spinal cord tumors compared to the FPD. We retrospec-tively analyzed the cases of 108 patients with spinal cord tumors treated surgically in our institute; the IPD, FPD, mismatched cases, and concordance rate between the IPD and FPD were investigated. Five cases involved a mismatch between the IPD and FPD. The overall concordance rate was 95.4%, with 90.9% for extra-dural lesions, 98.5% for intradural extramedullary lesions, 84.2% for intramedullary lesions, and 100% for dumbbell-type tumors. The concordance rate of intramedullary lesions tended to be lower than that of other lesions (p = 0.096). A lower concordance rate was revealed for intramedullary lesions compared to the other lesions. Despite the IPD clearly remaining a valuable tool during operative procedures, surgeons should recog-nize the limitations of IPDs and make comprehensive decisions about surgical treatments.

Race Is an Independent Predictor for Nonroutine Discharges After Spine Surgery for Spinal Intradural/Cord Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if race was an independent predictor of extended length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge, and increased health care costs after surgery for spinal intradural/cord tumors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. All adult (>18 years old) inpatients who underwent surgical intervention for a benign or malignant spinal intradural/cord tumor were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedural coding systems. Patients were then categorized based on race: White, African American (AA), Hispanic, and other. Postoperative complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospitalization were assessed. A backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of extended LOS and nonroutine discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of 3595 patients identified, there were 2620 (72.9%) whites (W), 310 (8.6%) AAs/blacks, 275 (7.6%) Hispanic (H), and 390 (10.8%) other (O). Postoperative complication rates were similar among the cohorts (P = 0.887). AAs had longer mean (W, 5.4 ± 4.2 days vs. AA, 8.9 ± 9.5 days vs. H, 5.9 ± 3.9 days vs. O, 6.1 ± 3.9 days; P = 0.014) length of hospitalizations than the other cohorts. The overall incidence of nonroutine discharge was 55% (n = 1979), with AA race having the highest rate of nonroutine discharges (W, 53.8% vs. AA, 74.2% vs. H, 45.5% vs. O, 43.6%; P = 0.016). On multivariate regression analysis, AA race was the only significant racial independent predictor of nonroutine discharge disposition (odds ratio, 3.32; confidence interval, 1.67-6.60; P < 0.001), but not extended LOS (P = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that AA race is an independent predictor of nonroutine discharge disposition in patients undergoing surgical intervention for a spinal intradural/cord tumor.

Cost and Health Care Resource Utilization Differences After Spine Surgery for Bony Spine versus Primary Intradural Spine Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs after spine surgery for bony spine tumors and intradural spinal neoplasms. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. All adult inpatients who underwent surgical intervention for a primary intradural spinal tumor or primary/metastatic bony spine tumor were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis/procedural coding systems. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospitalization were assessed. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of perioperative complication, extended LOS (≥75th percentile), and increased cost (≥75th percentile). RESULTS: A total of 9855 adult patients were included in the study; 3850 (39.1%) were identified as having a primary intradural spinal tumor and 6005 (60.9%) had a primary or metastatic bony spine tumor. Those treated for bony tumors had more comorbidities (≥3, 67.8% vs. 29.2%) and more commonly experienced ≥1 complications (29.9% vs. 7.9%). Multivariate analyses also showed those in the bony spine cohort had a higher odds of experiencing ≥1 complications (odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04-5.97; P < 0.001), extended LOS (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.75-3.38; P < 0.001), and increased cost (OR, 5.32; 95% CI, 3.67-7.71; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to patients being treated for primary intradural tumors, those undergoing spine surgery for bony spine tumors experience significantly higher risk for perioperative complications, extended LOS, and increased cost of hospital admission. Further identification of patient and treatment characteristics that may optimize management of spine oncology may reduce adverse outcomes, improve patient care, and reduce health care resources.

Evaluating the Clinical Utility and Cost of Imaging Strategies in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Primary Intradural Spinal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with new primary intradural spinal tumors, the best screening strategy for additional central nervous system (CNS) lesions is unclear. The goal of this study was to document the rate of additional CNS tumors in these patients. METHODS: Adults with primary intradural spinal tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging strategy at diagnosis was classified as focused spine (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar), total spine, or complete neuraxis (brain and total spine). Tumor pathology, genetic syndromes, and presence of additional CNS lesions at diagnosis or follow-up were collected. RESULTS: The study comprised 319 patients with mean age of 51 years and mean follow-up of 41 months. In 151 patients with focused spine imaging, 3 (2.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.4%) requiring treatment. In 35 patients with total spine imaging, there were no additional lesions. In 133 patients with complete neuraxis imaging, 4 (3.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.5%) requiring treatment. There was no difference in the identification of new lesions (P = 0.542) or new lesions requiring treatment (P = 0.772) across imaging strategies. Among patients without genetic syndromes, rates of new lesions requiring treatment were 1.4% for focused spine, 0% for total spine, and 2.2% for complete neuraxis (P = 0.683). There were no cases of delayed identification causing risk to life or neurological function. Complete neuraxis imaging carried an increased charge of $4420 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients without an underlying genetic syndrome, the likelihood of identifying additional CNS lesions requiring treatment is low. In appropriate cases, focused spine imaging may be a more cost-effective strategy.

Demographic and socioeconomic disparities of benign and malignant spinal meningiomas in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal meningiomas constitute the majority of primary spinal neoplasms, yet their pathogenesis remains elusive. By investigating the distribution of these tumors across sociodemographic variables can provide direction in etiology elucidation and healthcare disparity identification. METHODS: To investigate benign and malignant spinal meningioma incidences (per 100,000) with respect to sex, age, income, residence, and race/ethnicity, we queried the largest American administrative dataset (1997-2016), the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), which surveys 20% of United States (US) discharges. RESULTS: Annual national incidence was 0.62 for benign tumors and 0.056 for malignant. For benign meningiomas, females had an incidence of 0.81, larger (P=0.000004) than males at 0.40; yet for malignant meningiomas, males had a larger (P=0.006) incidence at 0.062 than females at 0.053. Amongst age groups, peak incidence was largest for those 65-84 years old (2.03) in the benign group, but 45-64 years old (0.083) for the malignant group. For benign and malignant meningiomas respectively, individuals with middle/high income had an incidence of 0.67 and 0.060, larger (P=0.000008; P=0.04) than the 0.48 and 0.046 of low income patients. Incidences were statistically similar (P=0.2) across patient residence communities. Examining race/ethnicity (P=0.000003) for benign meningiomas, incidences for Whites, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Hispanics, and Blacks were as follows, respectively: 0.83, 0.42, 0.28, 0.15. CONCLUSIONS: Across sociodemographic strata, healthcare inequalities were identified with regards to spinal meningiomas. For benign spinal meningiomas, incidence was greatest for patients who were female, 65-84 years old, middle/high income, living in rural communities, White, and Asian/Pacific Islander. Meanwhile, for malignant spinal meningiomas incidence was greatest for males, those 45-65 years old, and middle/high income.

Review of ependymomas: assessment of consensus in pathological diagnosis and correlations with genetic profiles and outcome.

We focused on histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of ependymoma (EPN) with molecular profiles to develop more reproducible criteria of the diagnosis. Three expert neuropathologists reviewed the pathology of 130 samples from the Japan Pediatric Molecular Neuro-Oncology Group study. Confirmed cases were assessed for histology, surrogate markers, molecular subgrouping, and survival data. We reached a consensus regarding the diagnosis of EPNs in 100% of spinal cord tumors and 93% of posterior fossa (PF) tumors that had been diagnosed as EPNs by local pathologists, whereas we reached a consensus regarding only 77% of the local diagnosis of supratentorial (ST) EPNs. Among the PF-EPNs, most of anaplastic ependymomas (AEPNs) were defined as EPN-A by methylation profiling, which was significantly correlated with the subgroup assignment. Regarding prognosis, the overall survival of patients with PF-EPN was significantly better than that of patients with PF AEPN (p = 0.01). Histologically, all ependymoma, RELA fusion-positive (EPN-RELA) qualified as Grade III. Both L1 cell adhesion molecule and nuclear factor kappaB p65 antibodies showed good sensitivity for detecting EPN-RELA. This study indicated that the expert consensus pathological diagnosis could correlate well with the molecular classifications in EPNs. ST EPNs should be diagnosed more carefully by histological and molecular analyses.

Treatment burden and long-term health deficits of patients with low-grade gliomas or glioneuronal tumors diagnosed during the first year of life.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and low-grade glioneuronal tumors (LGGNTs) diagnosed during the first year of life carry unique clinical characteristics and challenges in management. However, data on the treatment burden, outcomes, and morbidities are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective study of LGGs and LGGNTs diagnosed in patients younger than 12 months at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (1986-2015) was conducted. RESULTS: For the 51 patients (including 31 males), the mean age at diagnosis was 6.47 months (range, 0.17-11.76 months), and the mean follow-up period was 11.8 years (range, 0.21-29.19 years). Tumor locations were hypothalamic/optic pathway (61%), hemispheric (12%), brainstem (12%), cerebellar (8%), and spinal (8%). There were 41 patients with histological diagnoses: 28 had World Health Organization grade 1 tumors, 6 had grade 2 tumors, and 7 had an LGG/LGGNT not definitively graded. Forty-one patients required an active intervention at diagnosis. Throughout their treatment course, 41 patients eventually underwent tumor-directed surgeries (median, 2 surgeries; range, 1-6), 39 received chemotherapy (median, 2 regimens; range, 1-13), and 21 received radiotherapy. Forty patients experienced disease progression (median, 2 progressions; range, 1-18). Ten patients died of progression (n = 5), malignant transformation (n = 2), a second cancer (n = 2), or a shunt infection (n = 1). The 10-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and radiation-free survival rates were 85% ± 5.3%, 16.9% ± 5.3%, and 51.2% ± 7.5%, respectively. Forty-nine patients experienced health deficits (eg, endocrinopathies, obesity, seizures, visual/hearing impairments, neurocognitive impairments, and cerebrovascular disease). Predictors of progression and toxicities were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Infantile LGG/LGGNT is a chronic, progressive disease universally associated with long-term morbidities and requires multidisciplinary intervention.

Intradural spinal tumors: 10 - years surgical experience in a single institution.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to present the therapeutic results of intradural tumor management over a 10 years period in a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consists in a prospective case series of patients treated at the neurosurgery service of the Social Security Institute of Mexico State and Provinces (ISSSEMYM), between January 2006 and December 2016. All patients were provided with information about the procedure and signed informed consent and institutional board approved files review for this study. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with intradural tumor were treated between 2006-2016. Most frequent lesions were extramedullary (30 patients, 85.7%). Most frequent tumor was Schwannoma, with thoracic/thoraco-lumbar location, being the most frequent location. All patients underwent surgical treatment, with total gross resection accomplished in 19 patients (54.3%). Surgical complication rate was 11.4%. Spine instrumentation was necessary in 26 patients (74.3%) because of bone destruction by the tumor, or bone removal for approach. All patients with intramedullary lesions and 5 patients (16.7%) with extramedullary lesions received post-operative radiotherapy. During the follow-up, 8.5% of patients had recurrence/progression of residual disease. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgery is the treatment of choice for intradural spinal tumors, and gross total resection with low morbidity must be the surgical goal. When this is not possible, partial resection and adjuvant therapy with radiosurgery are a valid option. Patients most be long followed-up because of recurrence risk or disease progression.

Epidemiology and national trends in prevalence and surgical management of metastatic spinal disease.

Surgical treatment for spinal metastasis has benefited from improvements in surgical techniques. However, the trends in treatment and outcomes for spinal metastasis surgery have not been well-established in a pediatric population. Patients <20 years old with metastatic spinal tumors undergoing spinal surgery were identified in the KID database. Trends for spinal metastases treatment and patient outcomes were analyzed using weight-adjusted ANOVAs. 333 patients were identified in the KID database. The top five primary diagnoses were metastatic brain/spinal cord tumor (19.8%), metastatic nervous system tumor (15.9%), metastatic bone cancer (13.2%), spinal cord tumor (4.2%), and tumor of ventricles (3.0%). There was an increased incidence of spinal metastasis diagnoses from 2003 to 2012 (88.5-117.9 per 100,000; p < 0.001) and an increased trend in the incidence of surgical treatment for spinal metastasis from 2003 to 2012 (p = 0.014). The average age was 10.19 ±â€¯6.33 years old and 38.4% were female. The average length of stay was 17.34 ±â€¯24.36 days. Average CCI increased over time (2003: 7.87 ±â€¯1.40, 2012: 8.44 ±â€¯1.39; p = 0.006). The most common surgeries were excision of spinal cord/meninges lesions (69.1%) and decompression of spinal canal (38.1%). Length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality did not change over time (17.34-18.04 days, p = 0.337; 1.6%-2.9%, p = 0.801). 10.5% of patients underwent a posterior fusion and 22.2% had at least one complication (nervous system, respiratory, dysphagia, infection). The overall complication rate remained stable over time (23.4%-21.8%, p = 0.952). Surgical treatment for spinal metastasis in the last decade has increased, though the complication rates, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay have remained stable.

Disparities in reportable quality metrics by insurance status in the primary spine neoplasm population.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defines "adverse quality events" as the incidence of certain complications such as postsurgical hematoma or iatrogenic pneumothorax during an inpatient stay. Patient safety indicators (PSI) are a means to measure the incidence of these adverse events. When adverse events occur, reimbursement to the hospital decreases. The incidence of adverse quality events among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms is unknown. Similarly, it is unclear what the impact of insurance status is on adverse care quality among this patient population. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the incidence of PSI among patients admitted with primary spinal neoplasms, and to determine the association between insurance status and the incidence of PSI in this population. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We included all patients, 18 years and older, in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) who were hospitalized for primary spine neoplasms from 1998 to 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of PSI from 1998 to 2011 served as outcome variable. METHODS: The NIS was queried for all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of primary spinal neoplasm during the inpatient episode from 1998 to 2011. Incidence of PSI was determined using publicly available lists of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of primary payer status on PSI incidence. All comparisons were made between privately insured patients and Medicaid or self-pay patients. RESULTS: We identified 6,095 hospitalizations in which a primary spinal neoplasm was recorded during the inpatient episode. We excluded patients younger than 18 years and those with "other" or "missing" primary insurance status, leaving 5,880 patients for analysis. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid or self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more PSI (odds ratio [OR] 1.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.95) relative to privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms, primary payer status predicts the incidence of PSI, an indicator of adverse health-care quality used to determine hospital reimbursement by the CMS. As reimbursement continues to be intertwined with reportable quality metrics, identifying vulnerable populations is critical to improving patient care.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of spinal tumor vascularity: correlation with angiography.

PURPOSE: To determine if dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) could correlate well with invasive angiography in the characterization of spinal tumor vascularity. METHODS: Totally 40 patients with untreated spinal tumors underwent MRI before preoperative angiography and embolization. Tumors were assigned to hypervascular, moderate, or hypovascular groups based on angiographic appearance. Tumor vascularity was also evaluated with enhancement degree on standard MR and with DCE-MRI parameters via ROI analysis of enhanced tumor area. The Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the correlation between the degree of angiographic vascularity and enhancement on MRI and DCE-MRI parameters. ROC analysis was conducted to assess the appropriate cut-off value. RESULTS: There were 12 hypervascular, 12 moderate, and 16 hypovascular tumors, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient between DCE-MRI parameter and the degree of angiographic vascularity was 0.899 (RSlopemax), 0.847 (Slopemax), 0.697 (E max), 0.694 (ERmax), and -0.587 (TTP), respectively, which showed excellent-to-moderate relationships. The RSlopemax cut-off value of 1.325 provided the highest specificity of 100 % and sensitivity of 87.5 % in predicting hypovascular tumors and the value of 1.85 provided the highest sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 96.4 % in characterizing hypervascular ones. CONCLUSIONS: DCE-MRI is an accurate technique for the assessment of spinal tumor vascularity, which may have a potential value in the decision-making of preoperative embolization.

Perioperative Cost Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS) has emerged as a clinically effective tool but its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. No studies have compared MIS vs open surgical techniques for the treatment of intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare open and MIS techniques for resection of IDEM tumors, with focus on perioperative costs. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including 35 IDEM patients (18 open, 17 MIS). Perioperative data, hospital costs, and hospital and physician charges for in-hospital services associated with the index surgical procedure and readmissions within 90 days were compared. RESULTS: Mean estimated blood loss, operative time, preoperative hospital charges, and physician fees were similar between open and MIS techniques. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. MIS cases were associated with shorter intensive care unit and floor stay. There were 3 complications in the open group, requiring 2 readmissions and 1 reoperation. Hospital costs ($21 307.80 open, $15 015.20 MIS, P < .01), and postoperative ($75 383.48 open, $56 006.88 MIS, P < .01) and total charges ($100 779.38 open, $76 100.92 MIS, P < .01) were significantly lower in the MIS group. There were no tumor recurrences in either group. All patients except for one in the open group maintained or improved their Nurick score. CONCLUSION: Both MIS and open techniques were able to adequately treat IDEM tumors. Reductions in complication rate and intensive care unit and hospital stay led to a decrease in hospital costs of almost 30% in the MIS group. MIS resection of IDEM tumors is not only an effective and safe option, but allows faster hospital discharge and significant cost savings.

A retrospective and consecutive analysis of the epidemiology and management of spinal cavernomas over the last 20 years in a single center.

Spinal cavernous malformations (SCM) are rare lesions often presenting with acute onset of symptoms and progressive neurological deterioration due to hemorrhage into the spinal cord. With the aid of modern techniques, their surgical removal became much safer. The present study was undertaken to analyze the outcome of our series of surgically and conservatively treated patients with SCM. Over a period of 20 years, 20 surgically treated and 5 conservatively managed patients with spinal cavernous malformations were identified and enrolled into this analysis. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, localization and extension of the cavernoma, as well as pre- and postoperative neurological status were obtained. The clinical status was assessed using the Frankel score. Patients were followed up clinically and by MRI. Before surgery, 90% (18/20) of our surgical patients were classified as Frankel D (93.8%), whereas two patients (10%) were graded C. None of the patients had a worse Frankel score at the time of discharge. Eighty percent of them (16 cases) remained unchanged, and 20% (4 patients) improved during the first follow-up (mean 6.3 months, range 2-17 months). All improved patients had a superficially located SCM and were operated early (≤3 months). No worsening was observed during extended follow-up (range 9-134 months, mean 44.7 months). Five nonsurgically treated patients showed no significant clinical deterioration over a period of 6.7 years (mean, range 2.9-8 years). SCM localization and number of involved segments had no influence on outcome. Our data show that SCM can be resected with favorable neurological outcome by using intraoperative neuromonitoring. Within the follow-up period, patients treated conservatively remained in a stable neurological condition.