The Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the Initial Assessment of Primary Tracheal Malignant Tumor: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in predicting the survival of patients with primary tracheal malignant tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of FDG PET/CT findings in 37 primary tracheal malignant tumor patients with a median follow-up period of 43.2 months (range, 10.8-143.2 months) was performed. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess the associations between quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters, other clinic-pathological factors, and overall survival (OS). A risk prognosis model was established according to the independent prognostic factors identified on multivariate analysis. A survival curve determined by the Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess whether the prognosis prediction model could effectively stratify patients with different risks factors. RESULTS: The median survival time of the 37 patients with tracheal tumors was 38.0 months, with a 95% confidence interval of 10.8 to 65.2 months. The 3-year, 5-year and 10-year survival rate were 54.1%, 43.2%, and 16.2%, respectively. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardized uptake value, age, pathological type, extension categories, and lymph node stage were included in multivariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed MTV (p = 0.011), TLG (p = 0.020), pathological type (p = 0.037), and extension categories (p = 0.038) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Additionally, assessment of the survival curve using the Kaplan-Meier method showed that our prognosis prediction model can effectively stratify patients with different risks factors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict the survival of patients with primary tracheal malignant tumors. Patients with an MTV > 5.19, a TLG > 16.94 on PET/CT scans, squamous cell carcinoma, and non-E1 were more likely to have a reduced OS.

Epidemiology and treatment trends for primary tracheal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Management of tracheal squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) has been complicated by the lack of prognostic data and staging. We describe the epidemiology of TSCC and current treatment approaches. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-two adult patients with primary TSCC from 2004 to 2012 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Demographic, clinical factors, and 5-year overall survival were analyzed. Staging was classified as localized, regional extension, and distant spread. Treatment modality was defined as "no treatment (NT)," "limited surgery (LS)," "curative surgery (CS)," "LS with any adjuvant therapy (AT) (LS+AT)," "CS with AT (CS+AT)," "radiation therapy (RT)," or "chemoradiation (CRT)." RESULTS: Overall survival was 25%. Majority of cases were males, white, and occurred in sixth/seventh decades. Twenty-six percent of cases received CRT, 20% underwent LS+AT or CS+AT, 20% underwent LS or CS only, and 17% underwent RT alone. On multivariate analysis, CS (HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.69), CS+AT (HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.36-0.77), CRT (HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67), and RT (HR, 0.66 95% CI: 0.46-0.94) were associated with decreased likelihood of death compared to NT. Elderly patients and those with poor performance status had worse outcomes even on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TSCC is increasingly treated with surgery and systemic therapy in addition to RT, with improved survival outcomes. CS, CS+AT, CRT, or RT provided improved survival advantage in patients with variable levels of improvement based on the extent of the disease. Prospective trials would help differentiate survival advantages between treatment modalities. Patients' goals of care, comorbidities, and age should be considered when deciding appropriate treatment recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:405-412, 2020.

Demography, patterns of care and survival outcomes in patients with malignant tumors of trachea: A systematic review and individual patient data analysis of 733 patients.

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumors of the trachea (MTT) account for 0.01-0.4% of all cancer cases. The rarity of the tumor along with different histologies makes it is a great challenge on how to optimally treat tracheal tumors and most of the available data is from small retrospective data series. We performed a systematic review and individual patient data analysis to evaluate the patterns of care and survival outcomes in patient with MTT. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search in Pub Med and Google scholar was done to find all possible publications related to malignant tumors of the trachea. The data on patient demograpphy, treatment, survival and recurrence pattern of individual patient was collected from the published data and was entered in a predesigned proforma. Progression free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS] was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of documented progression and death respectively. Kaplan- Meier method was used for survival analysis and uni-variate analysis was performed using log rank test. SPSS v16 was used for all statistical analysis. RESULTS: 733 patients were included in this analysis. The most common histology was adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The gender ratio was 4.43: 1[male: female] in patients with SCC while it was 0.85:1[male: female] in ACC. Smoking and age >50 years were associated with worse OS. The estimated median overall survival for entire cohort was 96 months. Survival was significantly better in patients with ACC than in patients with SCC [165 vs. 14 months, p < 0.001]. The use of definitive surgery was associated with a significantly better survival of 180 months when compared to 48 months with radiation as local therapy, [p < 0.001]. The radiation dose used also affected survival in patients with SCC with a better median OS of 24 months in patients who recieved more than 60 Gy vs 6 months in whom the dose was less than 60 Gy although not statistically significant (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: ACC and SCC are the most common MTT. ACC has better prognosis compared to SCC. Surgery seems to provide better outcomes than radiation for ACC and sarcoma. Role of definitive radiotherapy versus surgery in SCC needs to be further studied.

Value of bronchoscopy after EUS in the preoperative assessment of patients with esophageal cancer at or above the carina.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with a strong tendency to infiltrate into surrounding structures. The aim of the present study is to determine the additional value of bronchoscopy for detecting invasion of the tracheobronchial tree after endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative assessment of patients with esophageal cancer at or above the carina. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2006, 104 patients were analyzed for histologically proven esophageal cancer at or above the carina. All patients underwent both EUS and bronchoscopy (with biopsy on indication) in the preoperative assessment of local resectability. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After extensive diagnostic workup, 58 of 104 patients (56%) were eligible for potentially curative esophagectomy; nine of these 58 patients (9/58, 15%) appeared to be incurable peroperatively because of ingrowth in the tracheobronchial tree (five patients), ingrowth in other vital structures (two patients) or distant metastases (two patients). Of the 46 non-operable patients, local irresectability (T-stage 4) was identified in 26 patients (26/46, 57%) due to invasion of vital structures on EUS: invasion of the aorta in six patients, invasion of the lung in 11 patients; in 12 patients invasion of the tracheobronchial tree was described, which was confirmed by bronchoscopy in only five patients. No patients with T4 were identified by bronchoscopy alone. CONCLUSION: For patients with esophageal tumors at or above the carina, no additional value of bronchoscopy (with biopsy on indication) to exclude invasion of the tracheobronchial tree was seen after EUS in a specialized centre. Although based on relatively small numbers, we conclude that bronchoscopy is not indicated if no invasion of the airways is identified on EUS.