5-Year Follow-Up of a Physician Performance Feedback Report Intervention to Reduce Overuse and Excess Cost: A National Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery efficiently treats skin cancer through staged resection, but surgeons' varying resection rates may lead to higher medical costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost savings associated with a quality improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify the change of mean stages per case for head/neck (HN) and trunk/extremity (TE) lesions before and after the quality improvement intervention from 2016 to 2021. They evaluated surgeon-level change in mean stages per case between the intervention and control groups, as well as the cost savings to Medicare over the same time period. RESULTS: A total of 2,014 surgeons performed Mohs procedures on HN lesions. Among outlier surgeons who were notified, 31 surgeons (94%) for HN and 24 surgeons (89%) for TE reduced their mean stages per case with a median reduction of 0.16 and 0.21 stages, respectively. Reductions were also observed among outlier surgeons who were not notified, reducing their mean stages per case by 0.1 and 0.15 stages, respectively. The associated total 5-year savings after the intervention was 92 million USD. CONCLUSION: The implementation of this physician-led benchmarking model was associated with broad reductions of physician utilization and significant cost savings.

Application of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Traditional hospital accounting fails to provide an accurate cost of complex surgical care. Here we describe the application of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to characterize costs of head and neck oncologic procedures involving free tissue transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: An analysis of head and neck oncologic procedures involving microvascular free flap reconstruction from 2018 to 2020 (n = 485) was performed using TDABC methodology to measure cost across operative case and postoperative admission, using quantity of time and cost per unit of each resource to characterize resource utilization. Univariate and generalized linear mixed models were used to examine associations between patient and hospital characteristics and cost of care delivery. RESULTS: The total cost of care delivery was $41,905.77 ± 21,870.27 with operating room (OR) supplies accounting for only 10% of the total cost. Multivariable analyses identified significant cost drivers including operative time, postoperative length of stay, number of return trips to the OR, postoperative complication, number of free flaps performed, and patient transfer from another hospital or via emergency department admission (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Operative time and postoperative length of stay, but not operative supplies, were primary drivers of cost of care for head and neck oncology cases involving free tissue transfer. TDABC offers granular cost characterization to inform cost optimization through unused capacity identification and postoperative admission efficiencies.

Race and Ethnicity Independently Predict Adverse Outcomes Following Head and Neck Autograft Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: There is growing attention toward the implications of race and ethnicity on health disparities within otolaryngology. While race is an established predictor of adverse head and neck oncologic outcomes, there is paucity in the literature on studies employing national, multi-institutional data to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on head and neck autograft surgery. METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, trends in 30 days outcomes were assessed. Patients with ICD-10 codes for malignant head and neck neoplasms were isolated. Autograft surgeries were selected using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for free flap and pedicled flap reconstruction. Primary outcomes included surgical complications, reoperation, readmission, extended length of stay and operation time. Each binary categorical variable was compared to racial/ethnic identity via binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 2447 patients who underwent head and neck autograft surgery (80.71% free flap reconstruction and 19.39% pedicled flap reconstruction). Black patients had significantly higher odds of overall surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.091, 2.298, p = 0.016) with much higher odds of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 2.291, 95% CI 1.532, 3.426, p = <.001). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo reoperation within 30 days after surgery and were more likely to be hospitalized for more than 30 days post-operatively (OR 1.566, 95% CI 1.015, 2.418, p = 0.043 and OR 12.224, 95% CI 2.698, 55.377, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity serve as independent predictors of complications in the post-operative period following head and neck autograft surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3595-3603, 2024.

Financial (dis)incentives to surgical management of head and neck cancer care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) often require complex surgical reconstruction. This retrospective, cross-sectional study compares financial factors influencing HNC and breast cancer (BC) care to examine care disparities. METHODS: Pricing data from 2012 to 2021 was abstracted from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. Nonprofit and research support was quantified by searching the NIH, IRS, and GuideStar databases. New York State Department of Health data from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed to compare costs, charges, and payer mix. RESULTS: HNC reconstructive procedures reimburse lower than comparable breast procedures (p < 0.05). Nonprofit and research support for HNC is disproportionately low relative to disease burden. Patients hospitalized for HNC surgical procedures generated higher costs and lower charges than patients with BC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comparatively low procedure reimbursement, low nonprofit support, and high cost of care for patients with HNC relative to patients with BC may contribute to care disparities for patients with HNC.

Controversies in point-of-care 3D printing for oncological and reconstructive surgery with free software in oral and maxillofacial surgery: European regulations, costs, and timeframe.

The aim of this paper is to discuss the controversies surrounding the most recent European regulations, as well as the cost, for a 3D printing workflow using free-source software in the context of a tertiary level university hospital in the Spanish public health system. Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for head and neck oncological surgery with the printing of biomodels, cutting guides, and patient-specific implants has made it possible to simplify and make this type of highly complex surgery more predictable. This technology is not without drawbacks, such as increased costs and the lead times when planning with the biomedical industry. A review of the current European legislation and the literature on this subject was performed, and comparisons made with the authors' in-house 3D printing setup using free software and different 3D printers. The cost analysis revealed that for the cheapest setup with free software, it would be possible to amortize the investment from case 2, and in all cases the initial investment would be amortized before case 9. The timeframe ranged from 2 weeks with the biomedical industry to 72 h with point-of-care 3D printing. It is now possible to develop point-of-care 3D printing in any hospital with almost any budget.

Quality of life assessment after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review of available tools.

In this study, we aimed to appraise the quality and psychometric properties of quality of life (QOL) assessment tools used after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancers. A systematic review of QOL assessment tools used in head and neck cancer patients after microsurgical reconstruction was performed; emphasis was placed on psychometric properties and validity. Fifty-four studies published between January 2010 and February 2023 fulfilled the criteria; in these, twenty-three different QOL assessment tools were identified. The most commonly used instrument was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck version (EORTC-H&N). No assessment tool fulfilled all the quality criteria; no single tool presented evidence from all the components of validity. Almost all reported reliability coefficients were above 0.7; most papers reported an internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the global score. The array of available tools allows for the choice of the most appropriate one depending on the context faced by the clinician or researcher.

Malnutrition and Adverse Outcomes After Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) have an increased risk of malnutrition, partly due to disease location and treatment sequelae. Although malnutrition is associated with adverse outcomes, there is little data on the extent of outcomes and the sociodemographic factors associated with malnutrition in patients with HNC. Objectives: To investigate the association of race, ethnicity, and payer type with perioperative malnutrition in patients undergoing HNC surgery and how malnutrition affects clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Premier Healthcare Database to assess adult patients who had undergone HNC surgery from January 2008 to June 2020 at 482 hospitals across the US. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify a subset of patients with perioperative malnutrition. Patient characteristics, payer types, and hospital outcomes were then compared to find associations among race, ethnicity, payer type, malnutrition, and clinical outcomes using multivariable logistic regression models. Analyses were performed from August 2022 to January 2023. Exposures: Race, ethnicity, and payer type for primary outcome, and perioperative malnutrition status, race, ethnicity, and payer type for secondary outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perioperative malnutrition status. Secondary outcomes were discharge to home after surgery, hospital length of stay (LOS), total cost, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Results: The study population comprised 13 895 adult patients who had undergone HNC surgery during the study period; they had a mean (SD) age of 63.4 (12.1) years; 9425 male (67.8%) patients; 968 Black (7.0%), 10 698 White (77.0%), and 2229 (16.0%) individuals of other races; and 887 Hispanic (6.4%) and 13 008 non-Hispanic (93.6%) individuals. Among the total sample, there were 3136 patients (22.6%) diagnosed with perioperative malnutrition. Compared with White patients and patients with private health insurance, the odds of malnutrition were higher for non-Hispanic Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56), Medicaid-insured patients (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.46-1.95), and Medicare-insured patients (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73). Black patients and patients insured by Medicaid had increased LOS, costs, and PPCs, and lower rates of discharge to home. Malnutrition was independently associated with increased LOS (ß, 5.20 additional days; 95% CI, 4.83-5.64), higher costs (ß, $15 722 more cost; 95% CI, $14 301-$17 143), increased odds of PPCs (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.83-2.23), and lower odds of discharge to home (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.31-0.38). No independent association between malnutrition and mortality was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This retrospective cohort study found that 1 in 5 patients undergoing HNC surgery were malnourished. Malnourishment disproportionately affected Black patients and patients with Medicaid, and contributed to longer hospital stays, higher costs, and more postoperative complications.

Transoral robotic surgery - time for consensus on pain assessment. A review.

BACKGROUND: In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS. AIM: This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity. METHODS: Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases. RESULTS: Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology.

The Increasing Burden of Depression in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Cancer Operations.

OBJECTIVE: Depression remains prevalent in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) operations. The present study aimed to assess the impact of depression on perioperative and readmission outcomes following HNCA resection. METHODS: All elective hospitalizations involving HNCA resection were identified from the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by history of depression. To perform risk-adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, 3:1 nearest neighbor matching was performed. A subpopulation analysis was also conducted to assess interval development of depression in the postoperative period. RESULTS: Of an estimated 133,018 patients undergoing HNCA operations, 8.9% (n = 11,855) had comorbid depression. Over the decade-long study period, the prevalence of depression in this population increased (7.8% in 2010 vs. 10.0% in 2019, NPTrend<0.001). Among 24,938 propensity matched patients, those with depression had similar incidence of in-hospital mortality (0.4 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.14) as well as perioperative medical (22.0 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.93) and surgical (10.2 vs. 10.3, p = 0.84) complications, though had higher rates of non-home discharge (16.9 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission (13.6 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.030). Predictors of depression in the postoperative period included primary coverage by Medicare or Medicaid as well as comorbid anxiety or drug use disorder. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of depression in HNCA patients continues to increase. Although depression was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality and complications, it did impact rates of rehospitalization as well as non-routine discharge. Screening and therapeutic interventions addressing such postoperative events may serve to improve long-term clinical and financial outcomes in this at-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3-Retrospective cohort study Laryngoscope, 133:3396-3402, 2023.

Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative margin assessment techniques in surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Positive margins following head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) surgery lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Existing Intraoperative Margin Assessment (IMA) techniques are not widely used due to limitations in sampling technique, time constraints and resource requirements. We performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of existing IMA techniques in HNSCC, providing a benchmark against which emerging techniques may be judged. METHODS: The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Studies were included if they reported diagnostic metrics of techniques used during HNSCC surgery, compared with permanent histopathology. Screening, manuscript review and data extraction was performed by multiple independent observers. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using the bivariate random effects model. RESULTS: From an initial 2344 references, 35 studies were included for meta-analysis. Sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated for each group (n, Sens, Spec, DOR, AUROC): frozen section = 13, 0.798, 0.991, 309.8, 0.976; tumour-targeted fluorescence (TTF) = 5, 0.957, 0.827, 66.4, 0.944; optical techniques = 10, 0.919, 0.855, 58.9, 0.925; touch imprint cytology = 3, 0.925, 0.988, 51.1, 0.919; topical staining = 4, 0.918, 0.759, 16.4, 0.833. CONCLUSIONS: Frozen section and TTF had the best diagnostic performance. Frozen section is limited by sampling error. TTF shows promise but involves administration of a systemic agent. Neither is currently in widespread clinical use. Emerging techniques must demonstrate competitive diagnostic accuracy whilst allowing rapid, reliable, cost-effective results.

Perioperative Assessment/Prehabilitation in Larynx Cancer.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship is increasing, and with it, a shift in treatment practices has occurred. Radical surgical resections for the treatment of HNC have decreased, and organ preservation treatments have increased. Although effective in treating HNC, chemoradiation therapy toxicities can be detrimental to a patient's overall health, nutrition status, and quality of life (QOL). Considering that dysphagia is typically a driving element of dysfunction, speech-language pathologists are vital to the prehabilitation phase. Prehabilitation programs include a variety of components, with the primary goal being to improve functional and QOL outcomes posttreatment.

Outcomes of comprehensive geriatric assessment and surgical management in head and neck cancers of the elderly: an observational study.

AIM: The aims of this study were to assess the survival benefit of optimal vs suboptimal management in elderly patients presenting with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer for which surgery was the standard of care, and determine if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was a prognostic factor for survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018. Included patients were aged 70 or older at the time of diagnosis, and presented with UADT cancer with a theoretical indication for curative-intent surgery according to international guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years. Treatment included surgery in 67.6% of cases and was considered optimal in 60.6% of patients. The overall 3-year survival was 55.2%, and was significantly better in case of optimal vs suboptimal treatment (74.5% vs 25.8%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly improved 3-year survival included surgery (p < 0.001), age < 80 years, performance status < 2 and G8 score > 14. In multivariate analysis, CGA was associated with a better survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged over 70 presenting with UADT cancer for which the standard of care is surgery, an optimal management is associated with better overall survival. Receiving a CGA seems to provide a survival benefit in patients with a G8 score ≤ 14, through an optimization of the care pathway before and after the cancer treatment.

Immunonutrition in major oncologic head and neck surgery: Analysis of complications, plasmatic equilibrium, and costs.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition, in patients with solid tumors, is associated with a worse clinical outcome and about 40% of patients affected by head and neck cancers (HNC) are malnourished at the time of cancer diagnosis. We investigated the potential benefit of a standardized immunonutritional protocol (INP) to patients with HNC receiving major ablative surgery. METHODS: An observational study was conducted enrolling 199 patients: 50 treated with the INP and 149 with standard enteral nutrition. Complication rates, need for medications, and costs were considered as outcomes. RESULTS: INP played a protective role in development of major surgical complications (OR 0.23, p = 0.023), albumin administration (RR 0.38, p = 0.018), and antibiotic duration (p < 0.001) and is cost-effective in patients with moderate or severe malnutrition (-6083€ and -11 988€, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the utility of INP, and accurate nutritional screening can help to identify malnourished patients who would receive the most benefits from this protocol.

Head and neck cancer surgery in elderly patients: the role of frailty assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether any risk model, frailty index, patients' comorbidities, or demographic characteristics correlate with postoperative morbidity in elderly patients who underwent surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC). A secondary objective was to compare between frailty indexes that are used at our medical center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of head and neck cancer patients operated between 2007 and 2021 was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided into three age groups: 50-69 years, 70-79 years and ≥ 80 years. Although most elderly patients had a significantly higher rate of comorbidities and lower Norton scores, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in postoperative morbidity rates, intensive care unit (ICU) or internal medicine department admissions, re-hospitalization in 1-3 months, and in falling risk (MFS-Morse Fall Scale). On multivariate analysis there was a positive correlation between preoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA), dementia, and cardiac arrhythmias, and the probability for developing postoperative complication. The latter findings were not related to the patients' age. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we did not find higher postoperative morbidity rates among elderly population in comparison to younger age groups, and therefore, our current evaluation system could not assist in identifying elderly at risk. However, prediction of operative risk based on physiologic reserve or frailty is an important tool in the evaluation of elderly head and neck cancer patients. Future studies are needed to assess the role of frailty index in the elderly head and neck cancer population.

Clinical assessment of early mobilization after head and neck free flap reconstruction: A retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: We examined whether there were any differences in perioperative complications between patients who mobilized on the first postoperative day (early mobilization) and those who mobilized on the second postoperative day after head and neck reconstruction using free tissue transfer. METHODS: In the control group (n = 74), patients were instructed to mobilize on the second postoperative day (April 2019-March 2020), while in the early mobilization group (n = 101), patients were instructed to mobilize on the first postoperative day (April 2020-March 2021). Mobilization was defined as maintaining a standing position or walking. Clinical data were collected from medical records and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical background factors, with the exception of intraoperative blood loss volume. The proportion of patients who successfully mobilized on the day of instruction was significantly lower in the early mobilization group (89.1% vs. 98.7%). One case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss occurred in the control group, and three cases of partial flap loss occurred in the early mobilization group. There was no significant difference in partial or total flap loss between the two groups. There were no significant differences in other perioperative complications (wound infection, postoperative bleeding, and delirium) between the two groups. The median postoperative hospital stay was 24.5 and 25.0 days in the control and early mobilization groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, early mobilization on the first day after head and neck free flap reconstruction was safe and feasible.

Digital surgery group versus traditional experience group in head and neck reconstruction: a retrospective controlled study to analyze clinical value and time-economic-social effect.

OBJECTIVE: Discuss the application value of digital surgical technology in the reconstruction of head and neck defects after tumor resection and comprehensively evaluate time-economic-benefit cost. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of head and neck cancer patients who underwent reconstructive operations in head and neck surgery at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 was performed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 52 cases were included, including 25 cases using digital surgery (DS) and 27 cases using the conventional surgery (CS). The clinical-pathological characteristics, postoperative complications, functional aesthetic evaluation indexes, and time-cost-satisfaction evaluation indexes between the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed. Typical cases using digital surgery were shared. RESULTS: Outcomes between the two groups were comparable, and there was no significant difference in survival outcome and follow-up time between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the defect size, pathological type, other major clinicopathological features, or operation-related indicators (P > 0.05). The incidence of titanium plate displacement, deformation or exposure, and facial scar deformity in the DS group was significantly lower than that in the CS group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in other short-term or long-term complications (P > 0.05). The incidence of dysphagia and eating disorders in the DS group was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The speech and social functions were improved, but not significantly (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the evaluation index of facial aesthetics in this study (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the total operation time, preparation time of bone flap from the donor site, osteotomy time, and reconstruction time in the DS group were significantly lower than those in the traditional operation group (P < 0.05), but the shaping time and vascular anastomosis time of recipient area could not be shortened (P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in total hospitalization days between the DS group and CS group (P > 0.05), but the time of ICU treatment and postoperative intravenous nutrition support in the DS group were shorter than those in the CS group (P < 0.05). In particular, the preoperative doctor-patient communication of the DS group was more effective, and the treatment satisfaction of patients including their families was higher after operation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive application of digital surgical technology (CAD, CAM, VR, MA, etc.) in the reconstruction of the head and neck after tumor resection is feasible in clinical practice, which can not only improve the accuracy of repair, decrease some surgical complications, better preserve and improve patient's diet and speech function, and reduce the operation and hospitalization time, but also increase the treatment cost. Furthermore, it is conducive to doctor-patient communication and improves patient satisfaction.

Assessment of conditions leading to lost-to-follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer patients require close clinical follow up to monitor and address sequelae of treatment and for adequate cancer surveillance. The goal of this study is to determine barriers and risk factors for head and neck cancer patients who are lost-to-follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart review of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry was performed to identify patients who were lost-to-follow-up (LTF). LTF was defined as missing two consecutive appointments as recommended by their oncologic surgeon. Those identified as LTF were contacted via email and phone to complete a 16-question survey addressing possible barriers to follow up. RESULTS: Of the 353 patients reviewed, 53 met the criteria for LTF (15%). Forty-eight participants were contacted, and 23 surveys were completed (48%). Of the 23 patients that responded, 22% reported difficulty scheduling an appointment, 30% had transportation barriers, 22% had personal or work obligations that prevented follow up, 17% did not follow up because they "felt better," and 39% were following up with an otolaryngologist or oncologist closer to home. Only three participants (13%) were aware of the recommended 5-year surveillance period. CONCLUSION: Head and neck cancer patients have a variety of reasons they are lost to follow-up. Understanding these barriers is critical to creating a patient-centered model that balances both clinical surveillance needs and reasonable expectations for patients. Improvements can be made to educate patients on the recommended length of follow-up and its importance.

International assessment of interobserver reproducibility of flap delineation in head and neck carcinoma.

Background: Several reports have suggested that radiotherapy after reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC), could have deleterious effects on the flaps with respect to functional outcomes. To predict and prevent toxicities, flap delineation should be accurate and reproducible. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the interobserver variability of frequent types of flaps used in HNC, based on the recent GORTEC atlas.Materials and methods: Each member of an international working group (WG) consisting of 14 experts delineated the flaps on a CT set from six patients. Each patient had one of the five most commonly used flaps in HNC: a regional pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, a local pedicled rotational soft tissue facial artery musculo-mucosal (FAMM) (2 patients), a fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap, a soft tissue anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap, or a fibular free flap. The WG's contours were compared to a reference contour, validated by a surgeon and a radiologist specializing in HNC. Contours were considered as reproducible if the median Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was > 0.7.Results: The median volumes of the six flaps delineated by the WG were close to the reference contour value, with approximately 50 cc for the pectoral, fibula, and ALT flaps, 20 cc for the radial forearm, and up to 10 cc for the FAMM. The volumetric ratio was thus close to the optimal value of 100% for all flaps. The median DSC obtained by the WG compared to the reference for the pectoralis flap, the FAMM, the radial forearm flap, ALT flap, and the fibular flap were 0.82, 0.40, 0.76, 0.81, and 0.76, respectively.Conclusions: This study showed that the delineation of four main flaps used for HNC was reproducible. The delineation of the FAMM, however, requires close cooperation between radiologist, surgeon and radiation oncologist because of the poor visibility of this flap on CT and its small size.

Association of Multiprofessional Preoperative Assessment and Information for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer With Postoperative Outcomes.

IMPORTANCE: Multidisciplinary perioperative assessment for patients undergoing complex oncologic head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery is widely implemented. However, to our knowledge, the association of multiprofessional preoperative assessment, information, and briefing with postoperative outcomes has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmissions, mortality, and costs per case among patients undergoing complex oncologic HNC surgery before and after the implementation of a comprehensive preoperative multiprofessional assessment and information day (MUPAID). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, single-center case-control study was conducted at a tertiary referral head and neck anticancer center/university cancer institute and compared patients with HNC who were undergoing complex oncological surgeries between January 2012 and July 2018 before (control group) and after (intervention group) implementation of the institutional MUPAID. Data analysis was conducted between 2019 and 2020. The intervention group comprised patients who participated in the MUPAID beginning in February 2015. These patients were assessed by a multiprofessional team and provided with structured and comprehensive information on the surgical procedure and its functional, social, financial, and psychological effects, as well as the postoperative care, rehabilitation, and follow-up period. Patients in the control group had also undergone complex oncologic HNC surgery and were selected through surgical procedure codes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The end points were postoperative rate and severity of complications, LOS, readmissions, mortality, and costs per case. RESULTS: The study included 161 patients, 81 in the intervention (25 women [30.9%]) and 80 in the control group (18 women [22.5%]). The groups showed no relevant differences in sociodemographic, disease, and procedural characteristics. The intervention cohort presented with fewer major local and systemic complications (Clavien-Dindo score, III-V: 34.6% vs 52.5%; difference proportion, -0.179; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.03), shorter median LOS (12 days [IQR, 10-16 days] vs 16 days [IQR, 11-20] days; effect size, 0.482; 95% CI Cohen d, 0.152-0.812) and decreased median charge per case ($50 848 [IQR, $42 510-$63 479] vs $69 602 [IQR, $45 631-$96 280]; effect size, 0.534; 95% CI Cohen d, 0.22-0.85). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this case-control study suggest that MUPAID for patients who are undergoing complex oncologic HNC surgery is associated with shortened LOS and costs per case as well as decreased complications severity. These results are promising on a patient level in the potential to minimize individual treatment burden, as well as on an institutional and health care system level in the potential significant optimization of surgical outcomes and financial aspects.

Needs assessment in patients surgically treated for head and neck cancer-a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect and feasibility of a head and neck cancer-specific needs assessment tool integrated into nursing rehabilitation consultations early in the post-surgical period on quality of life, symptom burden, and referrals for multidisciplinary follow-up. METHODS: Ninety-two surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. All participants received nursing rehabilitation consultations prior to discharge, and two weeks and two months post-operative. The intervention group had their needs assessed using Patient Concerns Inventory, while standard care used a systematic questioning approach. Primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden and referrals for multidisciplinary rehabilitation follow-up. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in quality of life or symptom burden between groups. However, 35% more patients in the intervention group were referred for rehabilitation. The attrition rate was similar in both groups, with a dropout rate of six in each group. No patients declined using the Patient Concerns Inventory. CONCLUSION: The intervention showed no improvement in QoL or symptom burden compared to standard care. However, the results suggest that important needs were identified and addressed. Especially emotional and existential needs, which were accommodated through referrals and professional advice. Nursing rehabilitation consultations using the Patient Concerns Inventory are feasible and may ensure that patient preferences and priorities are incorporated in their care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.com (NCT03443258). Date of registration: May 31st, 2018.