Healthcare utilization in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer: A survey-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite similar incidence, non-Hispanic Black women are twice as likely to die of endometrial cancer as non-Hispanic White women. The social determinants of health may contribute to this disparity. We studied barriers to care and social needs of endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: In a cohort of patients with endometrial cancer from the All of Us study, participants self-reported demographics and completed validated surveys (access to medical care, transportation, caregiving, finances, medication, general care, specialty care, housing insecurity). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated demographic and access factors associated with any need. RESULTS: Of 568 participants, 77.7% identified as non-Hispanic White, 7.5% Black, and 8.8% Hispanic. 59% were > 65 years and 95.8% insured. Contributors to delays in care were paying out of pocket (9.9%), provider anxiety (7.6%), transportation (6.3%), cost of copay (6.2%), and insufficient leave from work (5.6%). To mitigate healthcare costs, 16.2% of participants inquired about lower-cost medications, 11.1% reported delaying filling prescriptions, 7.6% taking fewer prescribed medications, and 6.5% skipped doses. Regarding multivariate analysis, participants earning <$25,000 had a 7.3 (95% CI 1.7-31.7) higher adjusted odds of transportation needs and 3.6 (95% CI 1.4-9.7) higher difficulty accessing specialists. No racial/ethnic disparities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Social needs and barriers to care are most pronounced among endometrial cancer survivors earning <$25,000. Unexpectedly, and possibly related to sample size or survey tool, race/ethnicity were not zassociated with barriers to care. Further studies on health-related social needs, optimal screening tools, and effective interventions are needed in order to achieve equity in cancer outcomes for endometrial cancer patients.

Racial disparities in endometrial cancer: Where are we after 26 years?

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female genital tract malignancy in the United States of America. Racial disparities surrounding this particular disease have been extensively investigated for over 26-years. We sought to determine if research in this area has led to any significant improvements in this disparity. METHODS: We performed a rapid systematic review of English language publications on racial disparities in endometrial cancer among African American (AAW) and white American women (WAW), from 1997 to 2023. We looked at trends in incidence and survival; impact of known poor prognostic factors (stage at diagnosis, histological subtypes, grade); co-morbidities; differences in treatment (surgery, radiation and chemotherapy); socioeconomic factors; differences in biological and genetic markers; and policies/declarations. RESULTS: During the period under review (1997-2023), there was a notable increase in both disease incidence (39%) and mortality (26%) rates for AAW, in comparison to WAW among whom the incidence rates increased by 2% and mortality rates rose, but 9% less than for AAW. It should be noted that the current incidence rate of 29.4% in AAW represent a reversal of what is was 26-years ago, when the incidence rate was 17.8%. In comparison to WAW, AAW had a higher prevalence of poor prognostic variables, more co-morbidities, lower income levels, less insurance coverage, and were more frequently under treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. To date no actionable molecular/genetic markers have been identified. We were unable to locate any published recommendations or active programs of implementation strategies/policies designed to effectively mitigate the documented racial disparity. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in disease incidence and mortality in endometrial cancer rates between WAW and AAW have widened during a 26-year period of robust research, suggesting that current research alone is not enough to eliminate this disparity. Based on this rapid systematic review we have identified and analyzed the impact of causation variables on this disparity. Additionally, we have made strong and pertinent recommendations for the benefit of mitigating this escalating racial disparity.

Racial, ethnic and country of origin disparities in aggressive endometrial cancer histologic subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the risk of an aggressive endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis by race, ethnicity, and country of origin to further elucidate histologic disparities in non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander (API), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN) vs. non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, particularly in Hispanic or API subgroups. METHODS: Patient diagnosed between 2004 and 2020 with low grade (LG)-endometrioid endometrial cancer (ECC) or an aggressive EC including grade 3 EEC, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mixed epithelial carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma in the National Cancer Database were studied. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for diagnosis of an aggressive EC histology was estimated using logistic modeling. RESULTS: There were 343,868 NHW, 48,897 NHB, 30,013 Hispanic, 15,015 API and 1646 AIAN patients. The OR (95% CI) for an aggressive EC diagnosis was 3.07 (3.01-3.13) for NHB, 1.08 (1.06-1.11) for Hispanic, 1.17 (1.13-1.21) for API and 1.07 (0.96-1.19) for AIAN, relative to NHW patients. Subset analyses by country of origin illustrated the diversity in the OR for an aggressive EC diagnosis among Hispanic (1.18 for Mexican to 1.87 for Dominican), Asian (1.14 Asian Indian-Pakistani to 1.48 Korean) and Pacific Islander (1.00 for Hawaiian to 1.33 for Samoan) descendants. Hispanic, API and AIAN patients were diagnosed 5-years younger that NHW patients, and the risk for an aggressive EC histology were all significantly higher than NHW patients after correcting for age. Insurance status was another independent risk factor for aggressive histology. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of an aggressive EC diagnosis varied by race, ethnicity, and country of origin. NHB patients had the highest risk, followed by Dominican, South/Central American, Cuban, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, and Filipino descendants.

Racial disparities in molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Racial differences in the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and associations with progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. METHODS: Molecular, clinical and PFS data were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) including classification into the integrative, somatic copy number alteration and transcript-based subtypes. The prevalence and prognostic value of the aggressive molecular subtypes (copy number variant [CNV]-high, cluster 4 or mitotic) were evaluated in Black and White patients. RESULTS: There were 337 patients including 14% self-designated as Black, 27% with advanced stage, and 82% with endometrioid histology. The CNV-high subtype was more common in Black than White patients (61.9% vs. 23.5%, P=0.0005) and suggested worse PFS in Black patients (hazard ratio [HR]=3.4, P=0.189). The cluster 4 subtype was more prevalent in Black patients (56.8% vs. 20.9%, P<0.0001) and associated with worse PFS in Black patients (HR=3.4, P=0.049). The mitotic subtype was more abundant in Black patients (64.1% vs. 33.7%, P=0.002), indicated worse PFS in Black patients (HR=4.1, P=0.044) including the endometrioid histology (HR=6.1, P=0.024) and exhibited race-associated enrichment in cell cycle signaling and pathways in cancer including PLK1 and BIRC7. All of these aggressive molecular subtypes also indicated worse PFS in White patients, with unique enrichments in mitotic signaling different from Black patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aggressive molecular subtypes from TCGA were more common in Black endometrial cancer patients and indicated worse PFS in both Black and White patients. The mitotic subtypes also indicated worse PFS in Black patients with endometrioid histology. Enrichment patterns in mitotic signaling may represent therapeutic opportunities.

Clinical characteristics associated with racial disparities in endometrial cancer outcomes: A surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities exist for endometrial cancer. We examined patterns of care and factors associated with poor outcomes for Black women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: We studied 110,826 endometrial cancer patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2008 with minimum 5years follow-up in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Trends over time in sociodemographics, disease characteristics and treatment factors were analyzed over four eras: 1980-1989, 1990-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2008. Using sequential Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models we determined the association between potential explanatory variables and racial disparities in all-cause mortality (ACM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM), respectively. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics of Black and White women were relatively constant over time. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) among Black women for ACM and CSM were 1.91 (95% CI 1.86-1.97) and 2.35 (95% CI 2.26-2.43), respectively. Adjustment for sociodemographics, disease presentation and surgery decreased the ACM HR to 1.29 (95% CI 1.24-1.34) and CSM HR to 1.18 (95% CI 1.11-1.26) without further decrease from controlling for radiotherapy. Black women were less likely to undergo operative management even when prescribed. Total and radical hysterectomy, and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) were associated with improved ACM and CSM. Combination VBT and external beam radiotherapy was associated with improved ACM. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in endometrial cancer survival are predominantly attributable to increased advanced stage, high-grade and aggressive histologic subtype tumors and differential use of surgery in Black women. Intensified surgical and radiation treatment is associated with improved survival, raising questions about treatment adaptations that may potentially reduce survival disparities.

Endometrial carcinoma recurrence according to race and ethnicity: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study.

Non-Hispanic black (NHB) women are more likely to experience an endometrial carcinoma (EC) recurrence compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. The extent to which tumor characteristics, socioeconomic status (SES) and treatment contribute to this observation is not well defined. In the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Study we evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence according to tumor characteristics with adjustment for potential confounders. Our analysis included 3,199 NHW, 532 NHB and 232 Hispanic women with EC. Recurrence was documented during follow-up. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence in models stratified by histologic subtype (low-grade endometrioid, high-grade endometrioid, serous, mixed cell, carcinosarcoma, clear cell) or stage (I, II, III) and adjusted for age, SES, body mass index, smoking status and treatment. In histologic subtype-stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted in NHB women with low-grade endometrioid (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.21-3.10) or carcinosarcomas (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.99-2.79) compared to NHWs. In stage-stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted among NHB women with stage I (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06-2.05) and Hispanic women with stage III disease (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.11-2.95). Our observations of higher EC recurrence risk among NHB and Hispanic women, as compared to NHW women, were not explained by tumor characteristics, SES, treatment or other confounders. Other factors, such as racial differences in tumor biology or other patient factors, should be explored as contributors to racial disparities in EC recurrence.

Race-specific molecular alterations correlate with differential outcomes for black and white endometrioid endometrial cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify molecular alterations associated with disease outcomes for white and black patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). METHODS: EEC samples from black (n = 17) and white patients (n = 13) were analyzed by proteomics (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) and transcriptomics (RNA-seq). Coordinate alterations were validated with RNA-seq data from black (n = 49) and white patients (n = 216). Concordantly altered candidates were further tested for associations with race-specific progression-free survival (PFS) in black (n = 64) or white patients (n = 267) via univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling and log-rank testing. RESULTS: Discovery analyses revealed significantly altered candidate proteins and transcripts between black and white patients, suggesting modulation of tumor cell viability in black patients and cell death signaling in black and white patients. Eighty-nine candidates were validated as altered between these patient cohorts, and a subset significantly correlated with differential PFS. White-specific PFS candidates included serpin family A member 4 (SERPINA4; hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; Wald P value = .02), integrin subunit α3 (ITGA3; HR, 0.76; P = .03), and Bet1 Golgi vesicular membrane trafficking protein like (BET1L; HR, 0.48; P = .04). Black-specific PFS candidates included family with sequence similarity 228 member B (FAM228B; HR, 0.13; P = .001) and HEAT repeat containing 6 (HEATR6; HR, 4.94; P = .047). Several candidates were also associated with overall survival (SERPINA4 and ITGA3) as well as PFS independent of disease stage, grade and myometrial invasion (SERPINA4, BET1L and FAM228B). CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified and validated molecular alterations in tumors from black and white EEC patients, including candidates significantly associated with altered disease outcomes within these patient cohorts. Cancer 2017;123:4004-12. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Surgical wait time: A new health indicator in women with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with delayed surgical treatment among women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we analyzed time to first surgery for epithelial endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from 2003 to 2011. Poisson regression was used to examine delays >6weeks between diagnosis and surgery, controlled for patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Survival for women diagnosed between 2003 and 2006 with timely versus delayed surgery was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The study included 112,041 women diagnosed at 1108 continuously reporting NCDB hospitals. Survival through 2011 was available for 40,184 women. All patients underwent hysterectomy. Twenty-eight percent of patients underwent surgery >6weeks after diagnosis. Poisson regression estimates indicated that being younger than 40years old, being black or Hispanic, having Medicaid or being uninsured, or being from the lowest education quartile were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of surgical wait time>6weeks. Patients diagnosed in 2010-2011 were more likely (IRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.40) to undergo surgery >6weeks after diagnosis compared to patients treated in 2003. Survival for women with surgical wait times >6weeks was worse than those treated within 6weeks of diagnosis (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Being a minority patient and having lower socioeconomic status or poor insurance coverage were associated with an increased likelihood of delayed surgical treatment. Wait times >6weeks from diagnosis of endometrial cancer to definitive surgery may have a negative impact on survival.

The Growing Burden of Endometrial Cancer: A Major Racial Disparity Affecting Black Women.

BACKGROUND: In contrast with the decreasing incidence seen for most cancers, endometrial cancer has been increasing in the United States. We examined whether the increasing incidence and mortality from endometrial cancer are equally distributed by race/ethnicity and tumor histologic subtype. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) endometrial cancer incidence and mortality data were obtained from 2000 to 2011. Age-adjusted incidence and incidence-based mortality rates, 95% confidence intervals, and annual percent changes (APC) were calculated. Rate ratios were calculated to compare racial/ethnic groups. Five-year relative survival rates were presented to explore survival by stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Incidence rates for endometrial cancers are rising across all racial/ethnic groups, with the greatest APC seen among non-Hispanic black (NHB) and Asian women (APC, 2.5 for both). NHB women have significantly higher incidence rates of aggressive endometrial cancers (clear cell, serous, high-grade endometrioid, and malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) compared with non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. Hispanic and Asian women have incidence rates equal to or lower than NHW women for all tumor subtypes. For nearly every stage and subtype, the 5-year relative survival for NHB women is significantly less than NHW women, whereas Hispanic and Asian women have the same or better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial cancer incidence is increasing for all women, particularly the aggressive subtypes. The disparity associated with excess incidence for these aggressive histologic subtypes and poorer survival is limited to NHB women. IMPACT: Increasing rates of aggressive endometrial cancers may widen the survival disparity between NHW and NHB women.

The centralization of robotic surgery in high-volume centers for endometrial cancer patients--a study of 6560 cases in the U.S.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hospital and patient factors associated with robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in the United States. METHODS: Data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the year 2010. Chi-squared and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 6560 endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgery, the median age was 62 (range: 22 to 99). 1647 (25%) underwent robotic surgery, 820 (13%) laparoscopic, and 4093 (62%) had open surgery. The majority was White (65%). Hospitals with 76 or more hysterectomy cases for endometrial cancer patients per year (4% of hospitals in the study) performed 31% of all hysterectomies and 40% of all robotic hysterectomies (p<0.01). 29% of Whites had robotic surgery compared to 15% of Hispanics, 12% of Blacks, and 11% of Asians (p<0.01). Patients with upper-middle and high incomes underwent robotic surgery more than patients with low or middle incomes (p<0.01). 27% of Medicare patients and 26% of patients with private insurance had robotic surgery compared to only 14% of Medicaid patients and 12% of uninsured patients (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of robotic surgeries for endometrial cancer were performed at a small number of high-volume hospitals in the United States. Socioeconomic status, insurance type, and race were also important predictors for the use of RS. Further studies are warranted to better understand the barriers to receiving minimally invasive surgery.

Effect of race and histology on patterns of failure in women with early stage endometrial cancer treated with high dose rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have helped refine management of early stage endometrial cancer (EC). For patients with intermediate risk features, adjuvant radiation is considered, primarily vaginal cuff brachytherapy. For higher risk patients, there may be a role for chemotherapy and radiation. The purpose of this study is to examine patterns of failure for early stage EC patients treated with postoperative high dose rate brachytherapy. METHODS: In this single institution retrospective cohort study, 208 women with early stage endometrial cancer who received definitive therapy between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2013 were identified. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 46.4 (range, 6.2-137.3) months. Thirteen (6.3%) patients developed with locoregional recurrent disease and 15 (7.2%) patients developed distant metastasis. Freedom from recurrence at 5 years was 88.6% for white patients and 60.5% for black patients (p=0.0093). Five year recurrence free survival (RFS) for white vs. black patients was 82.9% vs. 48.9% (p=0.0007). Five year overall survival (OS) was 86.8% for white patients and 59.5% for black patients (p=0.0023). Black patients with unfavorable histology treated with chemotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy had a 15% locoregional recurrence rate, more than double the rate of local recurrence compared to AA patients with endometrioid histology and white patients with any histology (6% locoregional recurrence rate). CONCLUSIONS: Black women with unfavorable histology early stage EC experience increased rates of recurrence and worse survival compared to white patients. Patterns of failure in this group also indicate a high locoregional failure rate for the black patients with unfavorable histology (type II).

Physical activity for an ethnically diverse sample of endometrial cancer survivors: a needs assessment and pilot intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the physical activity (PA) behavior, needs and preferences for underserved, ethnically diverse women with a history of endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Women with a history of EC (41 non-Hispanic black, 40 non-Hispanic white, and 18 Hispanic) completed a needs assessment during their regular follow-up appointments at Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, NY, USA. An 8-week pilot PA intervention based on the results of the needs assessment was conducted with 5 EC survivors. RESULTS: Mean body mass index (BMI) among the 99 respondents was 34.1±7.6 kg/m², and 66% did not exercise regularly. Self-described weight status was significantly lower than actual BMI category (p<0.001). Of the 86% who were interested in joining an exercise program, 95% were willing to attend at least once weekly. The primary motivations were improving health, losing weight, and feeling better physically. Despite the high interest in participation, volunteer rate was very low (8%). However, adherence to the 8-week pilot PA intervention was high (83%), and there were no adverse events. Body weight decreased in all pilot participants. CONCLUSION: These data show that ethnically diverse EC survivors have a great need for, and are highly interested in, PA interventions. However, greater care needs to be taken to assess and identify barriers to increase participation in such programs.

Racial disparities in treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of care and survival for African American and white women with high-grade endometrial cancer. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The effect of treatment modality on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 9,042 patients met study eligibility criteria. African Americans had definitive surgery (76.8% compared with 88.7%; P<.001) less frequently. There was no difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment between the groups. In the crude models for both all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality, African American women had an increased overall and disease-specific hazard of death compared with white women. The overall hazard ratio for African American women was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-1.7), and the disease-specific hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.6). Over the entire study period, after adjusting for stage, age, period of diagnosis, registry region, urban compared with rural setting, marital status, treatment, surgery, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, there was no association between race and lower disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 1-1.2; P=.06). CONCLUSION: African American women had lower cancer-specific and all-cause survival compared with white women. Controlling for treatment, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and histopathologic variables eliminated the difference between African American and white women in the disease-specific analysis.

Disparities in endometrial cancer outcomes between non-Hispanic White and Hispanic women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare demographics, tumor characteristics, the first course of treatment, and cancer-specific survival of non-Hispanic White and Hispanic women with endometrial cancer. METHODS: We used public-use data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The study included 69,764 non-Hispanic White and Hispanic women diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 2000 and 2010. Using Cox proportional hazards models, demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were assessed as potential explanatory variables for the survival disparity between non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimation with Bonferroni correction showed statistically different cancer-specific survival for U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites, but no difference between birthplace-unknown Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. In 2000-2005, U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanics had a higher risk of endometrial cancer death compared to non-Hispanic Whites after full adjustment (hazard rate (HR)=1.61, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.44-1.79 and 1.27, 95% CI:1.13-1.43). In 2006-2010, the risk of endometrial death was not statistically significant for U.S.-born Hispanics (HR=1.16, 95% CI:0.99-1.36), but increased for foreign-born Hispanics (HR=1.31, 95% CI:1.12-1.52). Most of the survival disparity between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women was mediated by cancer characteristics, specifically, stage and node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic women have higher cancer-specific mortality compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Compared to 2000-2005, more Hispanics were diagnosed at later stages and fewer received combination therapy in 2006-2010. Early detection is vital to improving endometrial cancer survival as most of the disparity was mediated by stage. Increased efforts are needed to improve education and access to care for Hispanic women.

The influence of comorbid conditions on racial disparities in endometrial cancer survival.

OBJECTIVE: There are known disparities in endometrial cancer survival with black women who experience a greater risk of death compared with white women. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the role of comorbid conditions as modifiers of endometrial cancer survival by race. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred seventy-one black women and 356 white women who had been diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 1990-2005 were identified from a large urban integrated health center. A retrospective chart review was conducted to gather information on comorbid conditions and other known demographic and clinical predictors of survival. RESULTS: Black women experienced a higher hazard of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.87) and from endometrial cancer (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.63-3.60). After adjustment for known clinical prognostic factors and comorbid conditions, the hazard of death for black women was elevated but no longer statistically significant for overall survival (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.94-1.57), and the hazard of death from endometrial cancer remained significantly increased (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.39-3.68). Both black and white women with a history of hypertension experienced a lower hazard of death from endometrial cancer (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.98; and HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.19-0.67, respectively). CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of comorbid conditions among black women does not explain fully the racial disparities that are seen in endometrial cancer survival. The association between hypertension and a lower hazard of death from endometrial cancer is intriguing, and further investigation into the underlying mechanism is needed.

Quantitative assessment of the association between CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk.

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) A4889G polymorphism was supposed to be associated with endometrial cancer risk, but previous studies reported conflicting results. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of all relevant studies to get a comprehensive assessment of the association between CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess the association. Finally, ten studies with a total of 1,682 endometrial cancer cases and 2,510 controls were finally included into the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the total ten studies showed that CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism was not associated with endometrial cancer risk (ORG versus A = 1.14, 95% CI 0.83-1.57, P OR = 0.417; ORGG versus AA = 1.23, 95% CI 0.70-2.18, P OR = 0.470; ORGG versus AA/AG = 1.03, 95% CI 0.59-1.81, P OR = 0.919; ORGG/AG versus AA = 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.81, P OR = 0.336). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity further showed that there was also no obvious association between CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk in both Caucasians and Asians. Sensitivity analysis by excluding single study in turns showed that the pooled estimations were not stable. Therefore, evidence for currently available data suggests that CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism is not associated with endometrial cancer risk. However, more studies with large number of participants are needed to further assess the association precisely.

Disparities in uterine cancer epidemiology, treatment, and survival among African Americans in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to comprehensively review the scientific literature and summarize the available data regarding the outcome disparities of African American women with uterine cancer. METHODS: Literature on disparities in uterine cancer was systematically reviewed using the PubMed search engine. Articles from 1992 to 2012 written in English were reviewed. Search terms included endometrial cancer, uterine cancer, racial disparities, and African American. RESULTS: Twenty-four original research articles with a total of 366,299 cases of endometrial cancer (337,597 Caucasian and 28,702 African American) were included. Compared to Caucasian women, African American women comprise 7% of new endometrial cancer cases, while accounting for approximately 14% of endometrial cancer deaths. They are diagnosed with later stage, higher-grade disease, and poorer prognostic histologic types compared to their Caucasian counterparts. They also suffer worse outcomes at every stage, grade, and for every histologic type. The cause of increased mortality is multifactorial. African American and white women have varying incidence of comorbid conditions, genetic susceptibility to malignancy, access to care and health coverage, and socioeconomic status; however, the most consistent contributors to incidence and mortality disparities are histology and socioeconomics. More robust genetic and molecular profile studies are in development to further explain histologic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies suggest that histologic and socioeconomic factors explain much of the disparity in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality between white and African American patients. Treatment factors likely contributed historically to differences in mortality; however, studies suggest most women now receive equal care. Molecular differences may be an important factor to explain the racial inequities. Coupled with a sustained commitment to increasing access to appropriate care, on-going research in biologic mechanisms underlying histopathologic differences will help address and reduce the number of African American women who disproportionately suffer and die from endometrial malignancy.

The impact of race and comorbidity on survival in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Poorer survival from endometrial cancer in blacks than in whites is well documented. The aims of this study were to determine whether diabetes, hypertension, or other conditions influence survival and whether accounting for these conditions reduces this racial disparity. METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we investigated the influence of diabetes, hypertension, and other comorbid conditions on survival in black and white women age ≥66 with endometrial cancer. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the influence of comorbidities on survival for blacks and whites separately and to study survival differences between blacks and whites after adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, and other medical conditions, as well as for demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment. RESULTS: In both racial subgroups, women with diabetes or other conditions had poorer overall survival, whereas hypertensive black women experienced better survival [HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.92]. For disease-specific survival, diabetes was associated with poorer survival in white women (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.35) but not in blacks (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.30); hypertension and other conditions were not significantly related to survival. After adjustment, black women had poorer survival than white women, with HRs of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05-1.28) for overall and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.08-1.49) for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes influences disease-specific survival in white women but not in blacks. The racial disparity in survival is not explained by the presence of other health conditions. IMPACT: Further research should focus on the unknown factors that lead to poorer survival in black women compared with whites.

The impact of race on survival in uterine serous carcinoma: a hospital-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Although less common than endometrioid carcinoma, uterine serous carcinoma (USC) accounts for a disproportionate number of endometrial cancer-related deaths. It is relatively more common in black compared to white women. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact of race on survival in USC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review in women with USC managed at two large urban medical centers. Clinical and histopathologic parameters were retrieved. Recurrence and survival data were obtained from medical records and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Differences in overall survival between African American and Caucasian women were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test for univariate analysis. Cox regression models for multivariate analyses were built to evaluate the relative impact of the various prognostic factors. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two women with USC were included in this study, including 65 Caucasian women and 107 African American women. Both groups were similar with respect to age, stage at diagnosis, angiolymphatic invasion (p=0.79), and the depth of myometrial invasion (p=0.36). There was no statistical difference in overall survival between African American and Caucasian patients in univariate analysis (p=0.14). In multivariate analysis, stage at diagnosis, angiolymphatic invasion, and depth of myometrial invasion, but not race, were significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this study, African American women with USC had a similar survival to Caucasian women. This suggests that the racial differences seen in USC at a larger population level may be diminished in hospital-based studies, where women are managed in a uniform way.