Cost-effectiveness analysis of proton beam therapy for treatment decision making in paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness is a pivotal consideration for clinical decision making of high-tech cancer treatment in developing countries. Intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT, the advanced form of proton beam therapy) has been found to improve the prognosis of the patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers compared with intensity-modulated photon-radiation therapy (IMRT). However, the cost-effectiveness of IMPT has not yet been fully evaluated. This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of IMPT versus IMRT for treatment decision making of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in Chinese settings. METHODS: A 3-state Markov model was designed for cost-effectiveness analysis. A base case evaluation was performed on a patient of 47-year-old (median age of patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China). Model robustness was examined by probabilistic sensitivity analysis, Markov cohort analysis and Tornado diagram. Cost-effective scenarios of IMPT were further identified by one-way sensitivity analyses and stratified analyses were performed for different age levels. The outcome measure of the model was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A strategy was defined as cost-effective if the ICER was below the societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China (30,828 US dollars ($) / quality-adjusted life year (QALY)). RESULTS: IMPT was identified as being cost-effective for the base case at the WTP of China, providing an extra 1.65 QALYs at an additional cost of $38,928.7 compared with IMRT, and had an ICER of $23,611.2 / QALY. Of note, cost-effective scenarios of IMPT only existed in the following independent conditions: probability of IMPT eradicating cancer ≥0.867; probability of IMRT eradicating cancer ≤0.764; or cost of IMPT ≤ $52,163.9. Stratified analyses for different age levels demonstrated that IMPT was more cost-effective in younger patients than older patients, and was cost-effective only in patients ≤56-year-old. CONCLUSIONS: Despite initially regarded as bearing high treatment cost, IMPT could still be cost-effective for patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China. The tumor control superiority of IMPT over IMRT and the patient's age should be the principal considerations for clinical decision of prescribing this new irradiation technique.

Definitive-intent radiotherapy for sinonasal carcinoma in cats: A multicenter retrospective assessment.

Treatment of epithelial sinonasal tumours in cats is not commonly reported. In the newer reports, palliative radiation protocols have been described more often than definitive-intent protocols. In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we included 27 cats treated with single-modality radiotherapy. Cats were irradiated using 10 daily fractions of 4.2 Gy. Three cats (11.1%) experienced a complete clinical response and 17 (63%) had a partial clinical response. Stable clinical disease was noted in three cats (11.1%). Four cats (14.8%) showed progression within 3 months following treatment. The median time to progression for all cases was 269 days (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 225; 314). The proportion of cats free of progression at 1 and 2 years was 24% (95% CI: 22%; 26%) and 5% (95% CI: 5%; 6%), respectively. None of the prognostic factors evaluated were predictive of outcome (anaemia, tumour volume at the time of staging, modified Adams stage, intracranial involvement, facial deformity, epistaxis, inappetence or weight loss). Median overall survival (OS) for all deaths was 452 days (95% CI: 334; 571). The proportion of cats alive at 1 and 2 years was 57% (95% CI: 37%; 77%) and 27% (95% CI: 25%; 29%), respectively. Surprisingly, cats with epistaxis had a longer median OS of 828 days (95% CI: 356; 1301) compared to 296 days (95% CI: 85; 508) in cats without epistaxis, (P = .04, Breslow). Radiation therapy used as a single modality for the treatment of feline sinonasal carcinoma improved clinical signs and was well tolerated but progression within a year was common.

Comorbidity burden and nonclinical factors associated with sinonasal cancer all-cause mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To describe comorbidity burden and nonclinical factors associated with all-cause mortality of sinonasal cancer in the United States. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2013) was queried for adult cases of sinonasal cancer (n = 10,518). Outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Independent variables included comorbidity score and nonclinical factors such as age, gender, race, facility type, distance to facility, insurance, and income. Survival analysis was conducted via multivariable extended Cox regression with Heaviside adjustments. RESULTS: Patients were mostly (79%), male (61%), and mean age of diagnosis was 63.5 years. Approximately one in five patients (18.7%) had a major comorbid condition (Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1) at diagnosis. After adjusting for clinical factors, increasing comorbidity score was associated with a corresponding increase in hazard of mortality (aHR comorbidity score of 1 = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16, 1.35), (aHR score of 2+ = 1.61; 95%, CI 1.41, 1.83). Hazard of mortality was also associated with being male (aHR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.17); black (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI, 1.03, 1.24); uninsured (aHR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.25, 1.68) or on Medicaid (aHR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33, 1.69); residence in zip codes with lower median income quartile (aHR < $30,000 = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06, 1.29); and treatment at community cancer programs (aHR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.01, 1.28). CONCLUSION: Comorbid disease is associated with all-cause sinonasal cancer mortality, and after accounting for known clinical factors, significant differences in mortality persist based on disparity-driven, nonclinical factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:1443-1449, 2020.

Education and insurance status: Impact on treatment and survival of sinonasal cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To understand the impact of education and insurance as social determinants of health on sinonasal cancer treatment and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Demographics, tumor characteristics, location, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival data for 1,365 patients diagnosed with sinonasal cancers were extracted from the SEER database. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.5. The Fine and Grey method was used to assess covariate impacts. RESULTS: Medicaid patients were more likely to live in counties with lower educational levels (8.32% vs. 6.46% below ninth grade education, P < .0001) and lower median household incomes ($56,316 vs. $60,284, P = .0004). Medicaid patients presented with later (T3-T4) stage disease compared to other insurances (P = .0007) and larger tumor size (P = .011). Medicaid patients were less likely to have surgery recommended (P = .0017) or receive surgery as part of their treatment (P = .0033). Analysis of histology-specific 5-year survival rates were lower for Medicaid patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first and largest study to examine how education and insurance status may impact treatment and outcomes in sinonasal cancers. It is the first using this method of examining other covariates and informing associated risk. Patients with Medicaid and less education present with larger sinonasal cancers. They are less likely to have surgery recommended or receive surgery. For SCCA, the most common histology, Medicaid patients have significantly worse survival. Further emphasis on education and improving health literacy is needed in the at-risk Medicaid populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:649-658, 2020.

Disparities in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma short- and long-term outcomes: Analysis from the national cancer database.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine sociodemographic, hospital-specific, and disease-related characteristics in relation to outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was queried for location codes corresponding to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and histology codes representing SCC malignancy. Multivariate analyses were performed against short- and long-term outcomes (overall survival, days to discharge, 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality). RESULTS: The database included 5,584 sinonasal SCC patients with an overall median survival of 53.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.7-57.8). On multivariate analysis, uninsured, Medicaid, and Medicare were independently associated with worse overall survival compared to private insurance (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22-1.82, P < .001; HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.85, P < .001; and HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29, P = .03, respectively). Both Medicaid and Medicare were also associated with increased 30-day mortality (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.76-143.29, P = .02; HR: 8.27, 95% CI: 1.66-70.88, P = .02, respectively), and Medicaid patients spent more time in the hospital following surgery (difference in days to discharge: HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.57-3.61, P < .01). Compared to white race, other race was associated with improved overall survival (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99, P = .04) but increased 30-day readmissions (HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.58-8.38, P < .01). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased 30-day readmissions (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.08-4.75, P = .02]. The highest income bracket (≥$63,000) was associated with fewer hospital readmissions (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.79, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic and economic differences in outcomes of patients with sinonasal SCC cancer exist. An understanding of these differences may help minimize disparities in oncologic treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Laryngoscope, 128:560-567, 2018.

Comprehensive assessment of prognostic markers for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the molecular signature of the rare tumor sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess various molecular biomarkers in SNSCC. METHODS: We chose 13 markers for this study, which have been known as prognostic markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expression of these markers was examined by either in situ hybridization or immunohistochemical methods on tissue microarrays made from 70 SNSCC specimens and 28 matched-pair normal tissues from patients who underwent surgical resection at our institution. Expression data were correlated with patient clinicopathologic parameters and survival. RESULTS: Of the 13 markers, only epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression was associated with significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS; p = .01307). EGFR expression was also associated with shorter overall survival (OS), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Targeted inhibition of tumor EGFR expression may be a new approach to treating SNSCC.

Estimating the social cost of respiratory cancer cases attributable to occupational exposures in France.

PURPOSE: The objective of this article was to estimate the social cost of respiratory cancer cases attributable to occupational risk factors in France in 2010. METHODS: According to the attributable fraction method and based on available epidemiological data from the literature, we estimated the number of respiratory cancer cases due to each identified risk factor. We used the cost-of-illness method with a prevalence-based approach. We took into account the direct and indirect costs. We estimated the cost of production losses due to morbidity (absenteeism and presenteeism) and mortality costs (years of production losses) in the market and nonmarket spheres. RESULTS: The social cost of lung, larynx, sinonasal and mesothelioma cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, chromium, diesel engine exhaust, paint, crystalline silica, wood and leather dust in France in 2010 were estimated at between 917 and 2,181 million euros. Between 795 and 2,011 million euros (87-92%) of total costs were due to lung cancer alone. Asbestos was by far the risk factor representing the greatest cost to French society in 2010 at between 531 and 1,538 million euros (58-71%), ahead of diesel engine exhaust, representing an estimated social cost of between 233 and 336 million euros, and crystalline silica (119-229 million euros). Indirect costs represented about 66% of total costs. CONCLUSION: Our assessment shows the magnitude of the economic impact of occupational respiratory cancers. It allows comparisons between countries and provides valuable information for policy-makers responsible for defining public health priorities.

Paranasal sinus cancer.

Paranasal sinus cancers are rare, aggressive tumours that are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. They differ from other upper aerodigestive tract tumours in terms of risk factors (wood dust exposure) and premalignant lesions (inverted papillomas). The diagnosis should be suspected in the presence of unilateral and continuous nasal sinus symptoms or bone lysis or a heterogeneous opacity on imaging. The definitive positive diagnosis is based on histological examination. Staging must comprise face, brain, neck and chest CT as well as face and brain MRI. Tumours are stage T3-T4 in two-thirds of cases and are associated with cervical lymph node involvement in 10% of squamous cell carcinomas and 4% of adenocarcinomas. These tumours must be managed in reference centres experienced in all of the various treatment modalities. Treatment decisions must be based on a multidisciplinary approach comprising local, regional and national REFCOR expertise (French rare head and neck cancer network). Optimal treatment is surgical resection with clear margins associated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Although it has been improved over recent decades, the prognosis remains poor with local recurrences occurring in 38% of cases and a five-year overall survival of about 63%.

Effect of radiotherapy interruptions on survival in medicare enrollees with local and regional head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether interruptions in radiotherapy are associated with decreased survival in a population-based sample of head-and-neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database we identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years and older diagnosed with local-regional head-and-neck cancer during the period 1997-2003. We examined claims records of 3864 patients completing radiotherapy for the presence of one or more 5-30-day interruption(s) in therapy. We then performed Cox regression analyses to estimate the association between therapy interruptions and survival. RESULTS: Patients with laryngeal tumors who experienced an interruption in radiotherapy had a 68% (95% confidence interval, 41-200%) increased risk of death, compared with patients with no interruptions. Patients with nasal cavity, nasopharynx, oral, salivary gland, and sinus tumors had similar associations between interruptions and increased risk of death, but these did not reach statistical significance because of small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment interruptions seem to influence survival time among patients with laryngeal tumors completing a full course of radiotherapy. At all head-and-neck sites, the association between interruptions and survival is sensitive to confounding by stage and other treatments. Further research is needed to develop methods to identify patients most susceptible to interruption-induced mortality.