Comprehensive Preclinical Assessment of ADVM-022, an Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Neovascular AMD and Diabetic Macular Edema.

Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor is the mode of action for several approved therapies, including aflibercept, for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Lack of compliance due to the frequent intravitreal dosing requirements may result in inadequately treated disease, leading to irreversible vision impairment. To date, the majority of gene therapy clinical trials providing sustained anti-VEGF levels in the retina have been limited to subretinal injections requiring a vitrectomy. A single intravitreal injection of a gene therapy product could drastically reduce the treatment burden and improve visual outcomes. ADVM-022, an adeno-associated virus vector encoding aflibercept, has been optimized for intravitreal delivery and strong protein expression. Long-term expression and efficacy of ADVM-022-derived aflibercept were evaluated in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model in non-human primates. Ocular safety was evaluated following long-term suppression of VEGF by clinical scoring (inflammatory parameters) as well as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electroretinography (ERG). Intravitreal administration of ADVM-022 was well tolerated and resulted in sustained aflibercept levels in ocular tissues. In addition, ADVM-022 administration 13 months before laser-induced CNV prevented the occurrence of clinically relevant CNV lesions, to the same degree as a bolus of aflibercept delivered at the time of laser. These results demonstrate that a single intravitreal administration of ADVM-022 may provide a safe and effective long-term treatment option for nAMD and DME, and may ultimately improve patients' visual outcomes. Clinical trials are currently underway, evaluating safety and efficacy following a single intravitreal injection of ADVM-022.

Presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome in a commercially insured population, United States.

PURPOSE: To describe epidemiologic features of patients with presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS) in the United States using insurance claims data and compare POHS patients with and without choroidal neovascularization (CNV). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for histoplasmosis retinitis on an outpatient claim in the 2014 IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database and the Medicare Supplemental Database who were enrolled for at least 2 years after the POHS code. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data related to testing, treatment, and direct medical costs. RESULTS: Among >50 million total MarketScan enrollees, 6,678 (13 per 100,000) had a POHS diagnosis code. Of those, 2,718 were enrolled for 2 years; 698 (25%) of whom had a CNV code. Eleven of the 13 states with the highest POHS rates bordered the Mississippi and Ohio rivers. CNV patients had significantly more eye care provider visits (mean 8.8 vs. 3.2, p<0.0001), more ophthalmic imaging tests, higher rates of treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (45% vs. 4%, p<0.0001), and incurred higher mean total yearly costs ($1,251.83 vs. $251.36, p<0.0001) than POHS patients without CNV. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between Histoplasma and POHS remains controversial, geographic patterns of POHS patient residence were consistent with the traditionally reported range of the fungus. CNV in the context of POHS was associated with additional healthcare use and costs. Further research to understand POHS etiology, risk factors, prevalence, and complications is needed, along with early diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Active surveillance of choroidal neovascularisation in children: incidence, aetiology and management findings from a national study in the UK.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the UK incidence, demographics, aetiology, management and visual outcome for children developing choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). METHODS: A prospective population-based observational study of routine practice via the British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit between January 2012 and December 2013 with subsequent 1-year follow-up in children under 16 years old with newly diagnosed CNV. RESULTS: Twenty-seven children with CNV were reported. The UK estimated annual incidence for those aged 16 and under was 0.21 per 100 000 (95% CI 0.133 to 0.299). The mean age was 11.1 years (SD 3.9, range 4-16). Fourteen were female. Seventy-seven per cent (22 patients) were Caucasian British. Twenty-three children (85%) had unilateral disease. The most common aetiology included inflammatory retinochoroidopathy (n=9), optic disc abnormalities (n=9) and idiopathic (n=5). Optical coherence tomography was performed in all cases and fundus fluorescein angiography in 61%. Management included observation only (n=10), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection of bevacizumab (n=14) or ranibizumab (n=2), or both (n=1), and additional use of oral (n=1) and local (periocular n=2 and intravitreal n=2) steroids in five children with inflammatory retinochoroidopathy. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections was 2±1, with eight patients receiving only one injection. The mean (SD) best corrected visual acuity in LogMAR was 0.91 (0.53) at presentation and 0.74 (0.53) at 1-year follow-up (p=0.09). CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based prospective study of CNV in children. This is a rare disorder with a poor visual prognosis irrespective of CNV location and the use of anti-VEGF therapy.

Targeted Intraceptor Nanoparticle for Neovascular Macular Degeneration: Preclinical Dose Optimization and Toxicology Assessment.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is treated with anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, which can cause geographic atrophy, infection, and retinal fibrosis. To minimize these toxicities, we developed a nanoparticle delivery system for recombinant Flt23k intraceptor plasmid (RGD.Flt23k.NP) to suppress VEGF intracellularly within choroidal neovascular (CNV) lesions in a laser-induced CNV mouse model through intravenous administration. In the current study, we examined the efficacy and safety of RGD.Flt23k.NP in mice. The effect of various doses was determined using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography to evaluate CNV leakage and volume. Efficacy was determined by the rate of inhibition of CNV volume at 2 weeks post-treatment. RGD.Flt23k.NP had peak efficacy at a dose range of 30-60 µg pFlt23k/mouse. Using the lower dose (30 µg pFlt23k/mouse), RGD.Flt23k.NP safety was determined both in single-dose groups and in repeat-dose (three times) groups by measuring body weight, organ weight, hemoglobin levels, complement C3 levels, and histological changes in vital organs. Neither toxicity nor inflammation from RGD.Flt23k.NP was detected. No side effect was detected on visual function. Thus, systemic RGD.Flt23k.NP may be an alternative to standard intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for the treatment of neovascular AMD.

Cost of myopic patients with and without myopic choroidal neovascularisation. / Costes en pacientes miopes magnos con y sin neovascularización coroidea miópica.

OBJECTIVE: To study the costs associated with high myopia (HM) with choroidal neovascularisation (mCNV) or without mCNV. METHODS: Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and multicentre study (HM and mCNV) conducted on adult patients. Annualised medical direct cost (MDC) from the perspective of the National Health System, the non-medical direct cost (nMDC) from the patient perspective, and productivity losses were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 137 mCNV and 48 HM patients were included (mean age [SD]: 55.1 [2.8] vs. 54.7 [13.8]; P=.2), with 80% women in both groups. The observation time (months) ranged from 17.9 (9.6) right eye (RE) and 20.0 (9.7), left eye (LE) in mCNV and 47.1 (21.5) RE/45.5 (20.7) LE in MM. A higher percentage of emergency room visits was observed in mCNV vs. HM patients (41.7 vs. 25%; P=.06) and retinal specialists (91.2 vs. 77.1%; P=.01). The MDC was higher in mCNV: € 1,985 (95% CI: 1772-2198) vs. € 356 (251-480) HM, P<.001. The nMDC was also higher in mCNV: € 256 (11-524) vs. €19 (11-26) HM, P>.4. The number of affected eyes, the follow-up time, and the mCNV were factors associated with direct costs. The impact on work productivity was higher in mCNV (quite/very concerned): 27.7 vs. 10.4% HM. The mCNV showed a significant association with activity impairment (OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 10.101-1.195). CONCLUSIONS: mCNV involves higher medical costs than HM. In addition, mCNV patients have a greater need of care and assistive devices, and greater impact of the disease in their work productivity.

The treatment of wet AMD in Canada: access to therapy (policy review).

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in North America, affecting 2 million Canadians older than age 50 years. AMD is subdivided into 2 types: an atrophic form, so-called "dry" AMD, and an exudative or "wet" form, characterized by the presence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Since 2000, after decades with no effective therapy aside from thermal obliterative laser treatment of CNV, 3 new treatments have been approved, each offering significant therapeutic advances at increasingly higher prices, and in an increasingly cost-containment-oriented payer environment. Many of Canada's public drug plans have been relatively slow to fund evidence-based, approved treatments. This paper reviews the disease, as well as the current private and public coverage for wet AMD treatments.

A value-based medicine comparison of interventions for subfoveal neovascular macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a value-based medicine analysis of clinical trials that evaluate the interventions of laser photocoagulation, intravitreal pegaptanib therapy, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for the treatment of classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. DESIGN: Reference case cost-utility analysis using value-based medicine principles, which use patient-based utility values and standardized, input variable criteria. PARTICIPANTS: Data from participants in the Macular Photocoagulation Study, Pegaptanib for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Study, and the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy Study. METHODS: Visual data were converted to a value-based format using time tradeoff utility analysis values from patients with macular degeneration. Costs were obtained from 2005 Medicare data. Outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and costs were discounted at a 3% annual rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interventional QALYs gained, percent improvement in quality of life, and dollars spent per QALY gained. RESULTS: Laser photocoagulation confers a 4.4% (P = 0.03 versus pegaptanib therapy) improvement in quality of life for the reference case, whereas pegaptanib therapy confers a 5.9% improvement and PDT confers an 8.1% (P = 0.0002 versus pegaptanib therapy) improvement. The cost-utility associated with laser photocoagulation is $8179, that for pegaptanib therapy is $66978, and that for PDT is $31544. All sensitivity analyses remain within the conventional standards of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy confers greater patient value than intravitreal pegaptanib therapy and laser photocoagulation for the treatment of classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Despite the fact that laser photocoagulation is the most cost-effective intervention, both PDT and pegaptanib therapy deliver greater value, and thus are both preferred over laser photocoagulation. Using an economic measure, photodynamic therapy is the preferred treatment among these 3 interventions.

Public health impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatments extrapolated from visual acuity.

PURPOSE: To estimate the potential public health impact of treatment with new medications intended to preserve vision in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A Markov model was used to simulate the natural history of AMD over the lifetime of patients with diagnosed neovascular AMD from clinical trials and epidemiologic surveys. It applied to a cohort of patients aged 75 years, with newly diagnosed neovascular AMD in one eye, whose visual acuity was 0.7 logMAR. Probabilities were calculated for the risk of AMD in the remaining eye and for premature mortality. Results of the model were expressed as the duration of low vision (worse eye VA>1.0 and better eye VA>0.7 logMAR) and blindness (bilateral VA >1.0 logMAR). Health consequences of blindness and low vision were estimated for depression, hip fractures, institutionalization, and life expectancy. RESULTS: For AMD patients with a 50% probability of VA >1.0 logMAR at 1 year, in one eye, the probability of lifetime bilateral blindness was >47%. The patients would live approximately 7 years with monocular vision >1.0 logMAR and an additional 4 years with bilateral blindness and a >15% probability of depression due to AMD. Life expectancy was decreased by approximately 2 years, >90/1000 patients would sustain a new hip fracture, and 1.5% of the patients would require institutional care for visual impairment due to AMD. To achieve a defined public health outcome (visual impairment and consequent comorbidity), it was necessary for the VA effectiveness of new treatments to increase in parallel with disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity related to visual impairment contributes significantly to the public health impact of AMD. Aggressive lesions need highly effective treatments. Models may be used to compare the public health impact of placebo-controlled clinical trial results.

The goal of value-based medicine analyses: comparability. The case for neovascular macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparability of articles in the peer-reviewed literature assessing the (1) patient value and (2) cost-utility (cost-effectiveness) associated with interventions for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: A search was performed in the National Library of Medicine database of 16 million peer-reviewed articles using the key words cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, value, verteporfin, pegaptanib, laser photocoagulation, ranibizumab, and therapy. All articles that used an outcome of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were studied in regard to (1) percent improvement in quality of life, (2) utility methodology, (3) utility respondents, (4) types of costs included (eg, direct healthcare, direct nonhealthcare, indirect), (5) cost bases (eg, Medicare, National Health Service in the United Kingdom), and (6) study cost perspective (eg, government, societal, third-party insurer). To qualify as a value-based medicine analysis, the patient value had to be measured using the outcome of the QALYs conferred by respective interventions. As with value-based medicine analyses, patient-based time tradeoff utility analysis had to be utilized, patient utility respondents were necessary, and direct medical costs were used. RESULTS: Among 21 cost-utility analyses performed on interventions for neovascular macular degeneration, 15 (71%) met value-based medicine criteria. The 6 others (29%) were not comparable owing to (1) varying utility methodology, (2) varying utility respondents, (3) differing costs utilized, (4) differing cost bases, and (5) varying study perspectives. Among value-based medicine studies, laser photocoagulation confers a 4.4% value gain (improvement in quality of life) for the treatment of classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Intravitreal pegaptanib confers a 5.9% value gain (improvement in quality of life) for classic, minimally classic, and occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin confers a 7.8% to 10.7% value gain for the treatment of classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Intravitreal ranibizumab therapy confers greater than a 15% value gain for the treatment of subfoveal occult and minimally classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cost-utility studies performed on interventions for neovascular macular degeneration are value-based medicine studies and thus are comparable. Value-based analyses of neovascular ARMD monotherapies demonstrate the power of value-based medicine to improve quality of care and concurrently maximize the efficacy of healthcare resource use in public policy. The comparability of value-based medicine cost-utility analyses has important implications for overall practice standards and public policy. The adoption of value-based medicine standards can greatly facilitate the goal of higher-quality care and maximize the best use of healthcare funds.

Estimating the yearly number of eyes with treatable neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a direct standardization method and a markov model.

PURPOSE: To estimate the number of treatable eyes with neovascular subfoveal age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) in France. METHODS: A literature search for studies documenting neovascular ARMD incidence rates and direct standardization according to age and gender were performed. Projection to the year 2025 was based on OECD (Organization for Economic and Co-operation Development) data. A cohort of patients aged 75 years was simulated by a seven-state Markov model. The mean treatment duration was fixed arbitrarily at 2 years. The probability of ARMD in the second eye was fixed at 30% at 5 years. Monthly mortality incidence was modeled from INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques) mortality tables. The time horizon of the model was 25 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Based on the Rotterdam Study, 30,192 citizens per year will develop ARMD in one eye. Among them, 17,585 will be neovascular and 13,805 neovascular subfoveal ARMD. Taking into account the second eye, mortality, and a 2-year treatment duration, the number of neovascular subfoveal treatable eyes yearly would be 37,019 by 2025. Treatment duration was the most sensitive parameter. The number of eyes would be 18,899, 53,204, 67,535, and 80,162, for treatment lasting 1, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. A 2% yearly increase is expected up to 2025, due to population aging and the 1950s baby boom. CONCLUSIONS: According to the study model, the yearly number of subfoveal neovascular ARMD treatable eyes in France will be 37,019 by 2025. Average treatment duration was the most sensitive parameter.

Progression of visual loss and time between initial assessment and treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the time elapsed from initial (referral) diagnosis of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to assessment and treatment by a retinal specialist is associated with visual deterioration in the intervening period. METHODS: A prospective pilot study of 38 consecutive AMD patients who presented with newly diagnosed subfoveal choroidal neovascularization was conducted in a tertiary care retinal practice. All eligible subjects underwent clinical examination and digital fluorescein angiography at the time of assessment by a retinal specialist. Correlations were performed to assess the association between continuous independent variables and any visual deterioration since initial diagnosis. Multivariate linear regression models with stepwise techniques were used to evaluate any association between visual progression and time elapsed, while controlling for potential clinical covariates. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 32 (84%) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; no differences in important variables were noted between those included and those excluded. The median time between initial diagnosis and referral assessment and treatment was 28 days (interquartile range=36.5 days); some degree of visual loss developed in 14 (44%) of the subjects. The elapsed time was correlated with progression of visual loss (r=0.50, p=0.003). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that only time elapsed and lesion type based on fluorescein angiography were associated with progression of visual loss (R2=0.491, F(4,28)=6.744, p=0.001); lesion size, age and sex were not significantly associated with progression of visual loss. INTERPRETATION: Delay in assessment and treatment of new-onset wet AMD by a retinal specialist is associated with a higher risk of visual loss.

Socioeconomic status and clinical features of patients undergoing photodynamic therapy or transpupillary thermotherapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare baseline clinical and socioeconomic features of patients undergoing self-funded photodynamic therapy (PDT) or government-funded subthreshold transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) with a diode laser for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Between July 2000 and August 2001, 115 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD were offered PDT as an initial intervention. If individuals believed that they could not afford or did not want PDT, then TTT was offered. In masked fashion, leakage pattern and lesion size were determined retrospectively from pretreatment angiograms. Baseline visual acuity was determined with autorefraction and subsequent Snellen testing. The mean income of each treatment group was estimated from the average sex-specific income for each subject's postal code, based on the 1996 Canadian census data. The average education level for each subject's postal code was also determined. RESULTS: The patients who were not willing to pay for PDT had significantly worse macular disease before treatment (larger lesions and poorer visual acuity) and a significantly lower mean income than the patients who were willing to pay for PDT. INTERPRETATION: The severity of exudative choroidal neovascularization appears to be associated with lower socioeconomic status.

Verteporfin : a review of its use in the management of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation.

UNLABELLED: Verteporfin (Visudyne) therapy (photodynamic therapy with intravenous liposomal verteporfin) is the first treatment to effectively prevent the loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), pathological myopia or presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS). In adult patients with classic subfoveal CNV or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, or subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS, verteporfin therapy slows or prevents loss of visual acuity. In well designed clinical trials, verteporfin therapy was superior to placebo in patients with subfoveal classic-containing CNV and occult with no classic CNV secondary to AMD at 12 and/or 24 months (Treatment of Age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy [TAP] Investigation and Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-AMD] trial) and in patients with pathological myopia at 12 months (Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy [VIP-PM] trial). Limited data suggest that verteporfin therapy also prevents loss of visual acuity in patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to POHS. Verteporfin therapy was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and transient. The most frequently reported verteporfin therapy-related adverse events (incidence >2%) were visual disturbance, injection-site reactions, photosensitivity reactions and infusion-related back pain. Approximately 5% of patients with occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD reported severe vision decrease within 7 days of treatment in clinical trials; 3 months later, several patients had recovered some of this loss. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, the first photosensitiser approved for the treatment of subfoveal CNV, is a well tolerated treatment that stabilises or slows visual acuity loss in adult patients with predominantly classic or occult with no classic subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, and subfoveal CNV secondary to pathological myopia or POHS. Thus, verteporfin therapy provides a valuable option for the management of these patients for whom treatment options are few, and should be considered as a first-line therapy in these difficult-to-manage conditions.