RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with non-dental orofacial pain syndromes will often primarily consult general dentists and other dental specialists. Early and correct diagnosis and therapy is crucial to prevent chronification. METHODS: We assessed the experience of dentists (general dentists and dental specialists; n = 533) and knowledge level of dental students (n = 130) on the diagnosis and treatment of non-dental orofacial pain. We used an anonymized survey containing 14 items with the four main themes (1) prescription patterns, (2) treatment strategies in non-dental orofacial pain, (3) interdisciplinary cooperation, and (4) self-assessment of knowledge as well as post-graduate education. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of dental students stated that they feel either 'not at all' (56%) or only 'somewhat' (36%) prepared for the diagnosis or treatment of non-dental orofacial pain. Only 23% of the dentists reported 'good' or 'very good' confidence for the diagnosis of non-dental orofacial pain. NSAID were the analgesics of choice when the pain is unspecific (25%) or even neuralgic (10%). Dentists referred patients with non-dental orofacial pain mostly to ENT-physicians (59%), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (54%) or TMD specialists (51%). CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary pain treatment seems to be well acknowledged, however, with a focus on referral within the community of dental specialists. Dental curricula and post-graduate trainings need to implement the diagnosis and treatment options of non-dental orofacial pain.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Odontólogos , Dor Facial/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudantes de Odontologia , Adulto , Síndrome da Ardência Bucal/complicações , Síndrome da Ardência Bucal/diagnóstico , Dor Facial/etiologia , Dor Facial/terapia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/complicações , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Otolaringologia , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Cirurgia Bucal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/complicações , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular/complicações , Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Odontalgia/complicações , Odontalgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/complicações , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/diagnósticoRESUMO
Little data are available on the overall incidence and characteristics of herpes zoster (HZ) in China, thus a community-based retrospective survey was conducted during December 2012 to March 2013 to collect HZ incident data over the past year in selected districts of Beijing, China. A total of 237 incident HZ cases were identified from 118,220 residents and majority of HZ patients (219/237, 92.4%) sought healthcare. Annual HZ incident rates were 1.90/1000 after adjusted and higher among females (2.4/1000) than males (1.7/1000). HZ rates increased with age and with a sharply rise among those aged ≥50 years particular for female. 217 cases were available for interview with 193 (88.9%) primary, 24 (11.1%) recurrent and 10 (4.6%) postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) cases respectively. No difference was shown between the primary and recurrent HZ cases in sex (P = 0.42), age (P = 0.72), times of healthcare seeking (P = 0.45), number of dermatome (P = 0.72), pain degree (P = 0.54), and hospitalization (P = 1.0). According to the survey, it can be speculated that disease burden of HZ is serious and caused at least 2.77 million cases annually in China. The recurrent HZ cases has similar characteristics to primary HZ cases. High proportion of healthcare seeking reminds that HIS records would be a feasible source for HZ surveillance to evaluate the trends and changes in China.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Pequim/epidemiologia , Feminino , Herpes Zoster/terapia , Herpes Zoster/virologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Acute herpes zoster and its complication post herpetic neuralgia represent a significant challenge to primary care physicians in their care of an ageing population of patients. This was a cross-sectional observational study by means of a quantitative survey of 1,000 general practitioners registered in Ireland exploring the frequency of diagnosis, methods of treatment and cost of AHZ and PHN in primary care. We recorded an 18% response rate (n = 184) with an 83% completion rate (n = 152/184). 80% of cases of AHZ occurred in patients aged 50 years or more with 81% of study participants encountering cases at a rate of 1-3 patients per month. Famciclovir (37%) and valaciclovir (36%) were the most commonly prescribed antiviral agents. Mild opioids (32%) were the most common analgesic agents used for first line AHZ pain, and pregabalin (37%) the most commonly prescribed analgesic agent for second line AHZ pain. Pregabalin was also the most commonly prescribed analgesic for both first and second line PHN pain (29% and 24%, respectively). The mean per-case direct cost (medication and GP visits) of treating AHZ and PHN in primary care was 195 (range 153-236) and 201 (range 140-313), respectively. Based on national sentinel data the estimated annual direct costs of treating AHZ and PHN in primary care is 2,278,196 (range 1,793,399-2, 763,445). The treatment of AHZ and PHN represents both a significant care and cost burden on primary care resources in Ireland in keeping with other European based studies.
Assuntos
Antivirais , Herpes Zoster , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster/economia , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/economia , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia are known to have a profound effect on the patient's quality of life, but the incidence and severity of itch and its relation with pain and quality of life in the long term are still relatively unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the presence and severity of pain and itch and impact on quality of life in patients over 50 years old with HZ. METHODS: We enrolled 661 patients with HZ in this 12-month observational study. Patient data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. Outcomes were pain, itch, burden of illness, impact on patient's daily life, impact on quality of life, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: At inclusion, 94% of patients reported any pain, 74.3% significant pain, and 26% severe pain. After 3 months, 18.8% of patients suffered from postherpetic neuralgia. At inclusion, 70.8% of patients had any itch, 39.2% significant itch, and 7.3% severe itch. The occurrence of pain increases costs and has a high impact on the quality of life, lowering EQ-5D scores by an average of 18%. In contrast, itch has little effect on the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and itch are highly prevalent months after HZ. Pain caused by HZ has a large impact on quality of life, burden of illness, impact on daily life, and health care costs for these patients. The impact of itch on quality of life is relatively small.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/epidemiologia , Prurido/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/economia , Prurido/diagnóstico , Prurido/economia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To provide a population-based estimate of the incidence of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) with comparisons across racial, sex, and age groups, as well as to estimate the frequency of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Hawaii health plan during the study period (N = 217 061). METHODS: All patient encounters between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, in the electronic medical record of Kaiser Permanente Hawaii were queried for International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) codes corresponding to HZO. Charts were reviewed to confirm a diagnosis of HZO and to collect information about specific ocular manifestations. Demographic data and information on PHN were collected electronically. Incidence rates were calculated per 100 000 person-years for the entire population and for age-, sex-, and race-specific subgroups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical diagnosis of HZO during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 134 cases of HZO were identified in this population of 217 061 people. The overall incidence was 30.9 per 100 000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.9-36.6). The incidence rate for the population aged ≥65 years was 104.6 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 79.0-135.9), approximately 5 times the remainder of the population (P < 0.001). The most common manifestation of HZO was dermatitis, followed by keratitis and conjunctivitis. The incidence of HZO for Pacific Islanders was 19.0 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 12.4-28.3), which was significantly lower than the rate for non-Pacific Islanders (P = 0.007). Twenty-one percent of patients with HZO developed PHN. Older age and HZO with keratitis, conjunctivitis, or uveitis were found to be risk factors for PHN. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a population-based estimate of HZO and highlights differences across various age and racial groups. It also suggests that demographic characteristics may be useful in determining the risk of developing HZO.
Assuntos
Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conjuntivite Viral/diagnóstico , Conjuntivite Viral/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Ceratite Herpética/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are limited data examining the real-world use of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). This study examines dosing patterns, therapy outcomes, healthcare utilization and costs of patients with PHN who initiate treatment with gabapentin or pregabalin. METHODS: This was a retrospective administrative claims data analysis from July 2005 to February 2010. Patients with PHN initiating gabapentin or pregabalin (index therapy) from January 2006 to February 2009 were identified and were observed for 12 months after index therapy initiation. Outcomes were mean daily dosages of the index therapy, attainment of minimally effective dosages of gabapentin (≥ 1,800 mg/day) or pregabalin (≥ 150 and ≥ 300 mg/day) persistence, discontinuation, index therapy switching, addition of neuropathic pain medications to index therapy, and healthcare resource use and costs. RESULTS: 1,645 patients were identified. The mean daily dosage was 826 mg for gabapentin and 187 mg for pregabalin. Only 52.6 % of patients initiating gabapentin and 56.9 % initiating pregabalin obtained a refill during the post-index period. Approximately 14 % of patients treated with gabapentin reached the target dosage (1,800 mg/day). For pregabalin, 87 % reached ≥ 150 mg/day and 27 % reached ≥ 300 mg/day. On average, patients took 10 weeks to reach 1,800 mg/day gabapentin, and 5.0 and 9.2 weeks to reach ≥ 150 mg/day and ≥ 300 mg/day pregabalin, respectively. Approximately one-third of patients in both index therapy cohorts added a pain medication; more than half added opioids. The percentage of patients switching from either drug (57 %) or adding a therapy (34 %) were similar between index therapy cohorts; opioids were the most common therapy patients switched to or added. CONCLUSION: It appears that gabapentin and pregabalin are not used effectively to treat PHN. Suboptimal dosing and discontinuation may be associated with supplementary use of other analgesics, especially opioids.
Assuntos
Aminas/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/administração & dosagem , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aminas/efeitos adversos , Aminas/economia , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/economia , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/efeitos adversos , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Uso de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Gabapentina , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pregabalina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/administração & dosagem , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/efeitos adversos , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Research has indicated that general practitioners (GPs) have good clinical judgment in regards to diagnosing and managing herpes zoster (HZ) within clinical practice in a country with limited resources for primary care and general practice. The objective of the current study was to assess the burden of HZ and post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) within rural general practices in Crete, Greece. METHODS: The current study took place within a rural setting in Crete, Greece during the period of November 2007 to November 2009 within the catchment area in which the Cretan Rural Practice-based Research Network is operating. In total 19 GP's from 14 health care units in rural Crete were invited to participate, covering a total turnover patient population of approximately 25, 000 subjects. For the purpose of this study an electronic record database was constructed and used as the main tool for monitoring HZ and PHN incidence. Stress related data was also collected with the use of the Short Anxiety Screening Test (SAST). RESULTS: The crude incidence rate of HZ was 1.4/1000 patients/year throughout the entire network of health centers and satellite practices, while among satellite practices alone it was calculated at 1.3/1000 patients/year. Additionally, the standardised incidence density within satellite practices was calculated at 1.6/1000 patients/year. In regards to the stress associated with HZ and PHN, the latter were found to have lower levels of anxiety, as assessed through the SAST score (17.4 ± 3.9 vs. 21.1 ± 5.7; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an electronic surveillance system was feasible so as to measure the burden of HZ and PHN within the rural general practice setting in Crete.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Herpes Zoster/economia , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Programática de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Redes Comunitárias/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estado Civil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Classe Social , Estresse Psicológico/classificação , Estresse Psicológico/diagnósticoRESUMO
Herpes zoster (shingles) is diagnosed clinically by recognition of the distinctive, painful vesicular rash appearing in a unilateral, dermatomal distribution. An estimated 1 million cases occur in the United States each year, and increasing age is the primary risk factor. Laboratory testing, including polymerase chain reaction, can confirm atypical cases. Treatment with acyclovir, famciclovir, or valacyclovir decreases the duration of the rash. Adjunct medications, including opioid analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, or corticosteroids, may relieve the pain associated with acute herpes zoster. There is conflicting evidence that antiviral therapy during the acute phase prevents postherpetic neuralgia. Postherpetic neuralgia in the cutaneous nerve distribution may last from 30 days to more than six months after the lesions have healed. Evidence supports treating postherpetic neuralgia with tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, pregabalin, long-acting opioids, or tramadol; moderate evidence supports the use of capsaicin cream or a lidocaine patch as a second-line agent. Immunization to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia is recommended for most adults 60 years and older.
Assuntos
Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/economia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To replicate and extend previous research concerning the validity and utility of using pain quality measures in clinical trials. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients with moderate-to-severe postherpetic neuralgia were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment conditions: (1) extended release gabapentin (G-ER) 1800 mg once-daily administered in the evening; (2) G-ER 1800 mg asymmetric divided dose (600 mg AM and 1200 mg PM); or (3) placebo G-ER. A measure of different pain qualities, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, was administered as a secondary measure in this study before, during, and after the treatment. RESULTS: The results suggest that G-ER, especially when administered twice-daily, have the greatest effects on sharp, dull, sensitive, and itchy pain. Few between-condition effects were found for the global ratings of intensity or unpleasantness, and for hot, cold, deep, or surface pain qualities. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide further support for the importance of assessing specific pain qualities as outcomes in clinical trials. The findings may also be used by clinicians for identifying those patients for whom G-ER may be particularly effective; that is, patients with postherpetic neuralgia presenting with pain described as sharp, dull, sensitive, or itchy.
Assuntos
Aminas/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/administração & dosagem , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Masculino , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/classificação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adequate pain assessment is critical for evaluating the efficacy of analgesic treatment in clinical practice and during the development of new therapies. Yet the currently used scores of global pain intensity fail to reflect the diversity of pain manifestations and the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. We have developed a tool for a standardized assessment of pain-related symptoms and signs that differentiates pain phenotypes independent of etiology. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using a structured interview (16 questions) and a standardized bedside examination (23 tests), we prospectively assessed symptoms and signs in 130 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain caused by diabetic polyneuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, or radicular low back pain (LBP), and in 57 patients with non-neuropathic (axial) LBP. A hierarchical cluster analysis revealed distinct association patterns of symptoms and signs (pain subtypes) that characterized six subgroups of patients with neuropathic pain and two subgroups of patients with non-neuropathic pain. Using a classification tree analysis, we identified the most discriminatory assessment items for the identification of pain subtypes. We combined these six interview questions and ten physical tests in a pain assessment tool that we named Standardized Evaluation of Pain (StEP). We validated StEP for the distinction between radicular and axial LBP in an independent group of 137 patients. StEP identified patients with radicular pain with high sensitivity (92%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-97%) and specificity (97%; 95% CI 89%-100%). The diagnostic accuracy of StEP exceeded that of a dedicated screening tool for neuropathic pain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, we were able to reproduce subtypes of radicular and axial LBP, underscoring the utility of StEP for discerning distinct constellations of symptoms and signs. CONCLUSIONS: We present a novel method of identifying pain subtypes that we believe reflect underlying pain mechanisms. We demonstrate that this new approach to pain assessment helps separate radicular from axial back pain. Beyond diagnostic utility, a standardized differentiation of pain subtypes that is independent of disease etiology may offer a unique opportunity to improve targeted analgesic treatment.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Exame Neurológico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Árvores de Decisões , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/fisiopatologia , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Física , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Accurate evaluation of pain plays a critical role in identifying new interventions for the treatment and prevention of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Different types of pain and other sensory symptoms are found in patients with herpes zoster, and these vary greatly with respect to their presence, location, duration, intensity, and quality. The results of recent studies of herpes zoster and PHN and the development of new methods for assessing neuropathic pain provide a foundation for diagnosing and assessing the pain associated with herpes zoster. We review the results of recent research to identify the essential components that must be considered in developing an evidence-based description of pain associated with herpes zoster and PHN. PERSPECTIVE: Comprehensive assessments of pain are necessary for clinical research on the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiologic mechanisms, treatment, and prevention of pain in herpes zoster and PHN.