Trend Observations in Home Parenteral Nutrition. Prevalence, Hospitalizations and Costs: Results from a Nationwide Analysis of Health Care Provider Data.

BACKGROUND: The population of patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) worldwide is growing. Since only a few counties provide data from national registries long-term observations are valuable to address this specific area of nutrition support. This study is a nationwide analysis determining the trends in the epidemiology of HPN (prevalence, age distribution, death rates), indications for HPN, causes for hospitalizations, and cost analysis of HPN reimbursement in Poland between 2010-2020. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data obtained from the national health fund (NHF) of Poland on adult patients on HPN. RESULTS: The prevalence of adult patients on HPN in Poland in 2020 was 53.26 per million citizens with a 2.99-fold increase and a growing trend observed from 2010. Significant decrease in the percentage of patients between 18-34, 45-54 and an increase in patients between 65-74 and patients over 75 years old was observed. Trend analysis showed an increase in new patients between 65-74 and a decrease between 35-54. Malnutrition (34.28%), postprocedural disorders of the GI tract (19.61%), intestinal malabsorption/other intestinal diseases (20.41%) and GI obstruction due to cancer (17.36% as primary and 23.16% as secondary diagnosis) were mostly reported as the primary indications for HPN. Cancer patients were mostly gastric, ovarian and colon cancer (34.74%, 17.83% and 12.3%). HPN and total health cost reimbursement increase was 2.6 and 2.57-fold respectively. Costs of HPN and total health care costs in 2020 per patient were € 10,015 and € 16,038, respectively. Overall death risk rate during the first year of nutrition was 0.59 with a significant increase in the observation period p-trend < 0.004. A significant increase in the death rate was observed in patients above 75 years old (estimate 1.629, p-trend < 0.030). Cancer, infection, malnutrition and GI symptoms were the most common indications for hospitalizations of HPN patients. The rate of patients with a maximal length of HPN of 5 months in 2010 was 54.9% and was growing up to 78.1% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HPN in Poland is growing. Trends of age distribution show increasing numbers of patients with more advanced age and shorter survival. Costs of HPN are comparable with other European data.

Results from an Epidemiological Follow-Up Survey on Home Artificial Nutrition in Switzerland from 2010 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Home artificial nutrition (HAN) is an established treatment for malnourished patients. Since July 2012, the costs for oral nutrition supplements (ONS) are covered by the compulsory health insurance providers in Switzerland if the patient has a medical indication based on the Swiss Society for Clinical Nutrition guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to analyse the development of HAN, including ONS, before and after July 2012. METHODS: We obtained the retrospective and anonymized data from the Swiss association for joint tasks of health insurers (SVK), who registered patients on HAN. Since not all health insurers are working with SVK, this retrospective study recorded nearly 65% of all new patients on HAN in Switzerland from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. RESULTS: A total of 33,410 patients (49.1% men and 50.9% women) with a mean BMI of 21.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and mean age of 68.9 ± 17.8 years were recorded. The number of patient cases on ONS increased from 808 cases in 2010 to 18,538 cases in 2015, while patient cases on home enteral nutrition (HEN) and home parenteral nutrition (HPN) remained approximately the same. The relative distribution of type of HAN changed from 26.2% cases on ONS, 68.7% cases on HEN and 5.1% cases on HPN in 2010 to 86.1% cases on ONS, 12.8% cases on HEN, and 1.1% cases on HPN in 2015. Treatment duration decreased for ONS from 698 ± 637 days to 171 ± 274 days, for HEN from 416 ± 553 days to 262 ± 459 days, and for HPN from 96 ± 206 days to 72 ± 123 days. Mean costs per patient decreased for ONS from 1,330 CHF in 2010 to 606 CHF in 2015. Total costs for HAN increased from 16,895,373 CHF in 2010 to 32,868,361 CHF in 2015. CONCLUSION: Our epidemiological follow-up study showed an immense increase in number of patients on HAN in Switzerland after July 2012. Due to shorter therapy duration and reduced mean costs per patient, total costs were only doubled while the number of patients increased 7-fold.

Assessment of Intestinal Failure Associated Liver Disease according to different diagnostic criteria.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD) has been defined using numerous criteria; however the clinical relevance of these criteria has never been compared. We therefore aimed to evaluate the prevalence, incidence, evolution of IFALD diagnosed by different criteria and to assess any clinical features that may be associated with its occurrence. METHODS: A cross sectional (CS) and retrospective study were carried out on adults on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for chronic intestinal failure (CIF) managed at a single center. Inclusion criteria at CS: age ≥18 years, benign disease. Collected data included: patient demographics, CIF and HPN characteristics, episodes of central venous catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). IFALD was diagnosed by 9 criteria based on liver function tests and liver ultrasound (US) imaging. IFALD diagnoses were categorized as steatosis (2 criteria), cholestasis (3 criteria) or fibrosis (2 criteria) and unclassified (2 criteria). Prevalence was assessed at CS and at starting HPN (baseline, BS). Evolution was assessed as change of IFALD between BS and CS. Incidence was calculated as patients who developed IFALD from BS to CS. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included. At CS, IFALD prevalence range in each diagnostic categories was: cholestasis 5-15%; steatosis 17-43%; fibrosis 10-20%; unclassified 7-38%. A 28.5% of patients did not have IFALD according to any criteria. Two cholestasis criteria and one fibrosis criterion were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with a short bowel syndrome as the pathophysiological mechanism of CIF, HPN requirement and the number of CRBSI episodes. At BS, IFALD prevalence range was: cholestasis 13-40%; steatosis 27-90%; fibrosis 2-5%; unclassified 8-75%. The incidence range of IFALD was: cholestasis 0-7%; steatosis 0-39%; fibrosis 7-18%; unclassified 4-9%. IFALD steatosis diagnosed by US was the most frequent diagnosis at both CS prevalence and incidence assessments. Notably, IFALD criteria normalized in various percentages (2-70%), depending on the diagnostic categories, between BS and CS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to systematically demonstrate that the frequency of IFALD varies greatly depending on diagnostic criteria used, confirming the need for a consensus definition to be used between different national and international IF units. IFALD can be present at HPN initiation but may resolve thereafter; further work is required to evaluate the factors associated with improvement.

Home parenteral nutrition and employment in patients with intestinal failure: Factors associated with return to employment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is provided to patients with intestinal failure (IF). HPN can however affect the patients' quality of life and ability to remain in employment. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of HPN on employment and factors associated with the likelihood of maintaining or returning to employment while on HPN. METHODS: Patients with chronic IF were identified from a prospectively maintained IF Unit database. A structured questionnaire was designed to probe employment both before and after starting HPN, intention to work and social welfare status (benefits & pensions). RESULTS: A total of 196 (62.8% females, median age 53 years) patients participated in the study of which 184 (94%) patients were in full or part time employment before their illness. At the time of starting HPN, 102 (52%) patients had the desire to return to work with 19 (18%) and 48 (47%) patients returning to full time or part time employment respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the frequency of the HPN infusion per week (p = 0.045) and intention to work after starting HPN (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with returning to work. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on HPN can have their employment status affected. The number of days per week on HPN and the desire of the patient to return to employment are significantly associated with employment.

Randomised clinical trial: 2% taurolidine versus 0.9% saline locking in patients on home parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND: The catheter lock solutions 2% taurolidine and 0.9% saline are both used to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in home parenteral nutrition patients. AIMS: To compare the effectiveness and safety of taurolidine and saline. METHODS: This multicentre double-blinded trial randomly assigned home parenteral nutrition patients to use either 2% taurolidine or 0.9% saline for 1 year. Patients were stratified in a new catheter group and a pre-existing catheter group. Primary outcome was the rate of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days in the new catheter group and pre-existing catheter group, separately. RESULTS: We randomised 105 patients, of which 102 were analysed as modified intention-to-treat population. In the new catheter group, rates of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days were 0.29 and 1.49 in the taurolidine and saline arm respectively (relative risk, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.71; P = 0.009). In the pre-existing catheter group, rates of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days were 0.39 and 1.32 in the taurolidine and saline arm respectively (relative risk, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.03-1.82; P = 0.25). Excluding one outlier patient in the taurolidine arm, mean costs per patient were $1865 for taurolidine and $4454 for saline (P = 0.03). Drug-related adverse events were rare and generally mild. CONCLUSIONS: In the new catheter group, taurolidine showed a clear decrease in CRBSI rate. In the pre-existing catheter group, no superiority of taurolidine could be demonstrated, most likely due to underpowering. Overall, taurolidine reduced the risk for CRBSIs by more than four times. Given its favourable safety and cost profile, taurolidine locking should be considered as an additional strategy to prevent CRBSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01826526.

Prevalence of Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is highly prevalent and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Studies continue to reveal significant clinical benefits with nutrition support, including improved wound healing, reduction in complications and length of stay, and mortality. Due to these benefits, the prevalence of home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) continues to increase worldwide. In the United States, given our healthcare insurance landscape, it has been very difficult to ascertain the true prevalence of HPEN. METHODS: Medicare beneficiary data for 2013 were obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Commonly used Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes were used for home enteral nutrition (HEN) and home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Data regarding number of patients and insurance providers were also obtained from 3 of the largest home infusion providers in the United States (Coram CVS, Option Care Enterprises, and BioScrip Inc). Based on the ratio of Medicare to non-Medicare billing, an estimate of HPEN prevalence was obtained. RESULTS: For 2013, there were 6778 Medicare beneficiaries for HPN and 114,287 for HEN. The ratio of Medicare to non-Medicare was 0.271 for HPN and 0.261 for HEN, leading to an estimated prevalence of 25,011 patients receiving HPN (79 per million U.S. inhabitants) and 437,882 patients receiving HEN (1385 per million U.S. inhabitants). There are an estimated 4129 pediatric patients and 20,883 adult patients receiving HPN; for HEN, 189,036 pediatric patients and 248,846 adult patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with results from 1992, the prevalence of HEN has increased dramatically, while the prevalence of HPN has declined.

Cost analysis of home parenteral nutrition in Spain / Estimación del coste de la nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en España

Introduction: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) improves quality of life, allowing patients to receive nutrition at home and providing a social and labor integration to these patients. Objective: To assess the direct costs of HPN in adult population in Spain. Methods: A literature review of the records of HPN in Spain, carry out by NADYA-SENPE Group (years 2007-2014), was performed. The analysis included the evolution of: patients requiring HPN, number of episodes/patient, mean duration of episodes, description of delivery routes and complications rate. HPN consumption and cost were estimated. Patients were grouped according to their pathological group: benign and malignant. Direct costs (€, 2015) included were: parenteral nutrition bags, delivery sets and costs due to complications. Results: The number of patients who receive HPN has increased over years (2007: 133 patients; 2014: 220 patients). The average number of episodes per patient ranged from 1-2 episodes per year. The average duration of those episodes decreased (2007: 323 days; 2014: 202.8 days). Tunneled catheters were the most used and septic complications were the most common. The average annual cost per patient was estimated at € 8,393.30 and € 9,261.60 for benign and malign disease respectively. Considering that 220 patients required HPN in 2014, an annual cost of € 1,846.524.96 (€ 1,389,910.55 directly due to HPN) and € 2,037,551.90 (€ 1,580,937.50 directly due to HPN) was estimated for patients with benign and malignant pathologies respectively. Conclusions: These results can be used to develop future economic evaluations on HPN and to establish effi cient prioritization strategies to allocate available resources.

Introducción: la nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD) mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes permitiéndoles recibir nutrición en su domicilio y facilitando su integración social y laboral. Objetivo: analizar el coste de la NPD en España. Métodos: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de los Registros de NPD en España (años 2007-2014), elaborados por el Grupo NADYA-SENPE. Se analizó la evolución de: pacientes que requerían NPD, episodios/paciente por los que se administró NPD, duración media de los episodios, vías de acceso y tasa de complicaciones. Se estimó el consumo y coste de la NPD. Los pacientes fueron agrupados según patología: benigna o maligna. Los costes directos (€, 2015) incluidos fueron: bolsas administradas, vías de acceso y complicaciones. Resultados: el número de pacientes que recibió NPD aumentó a lo largo de los años (2007: 133 pacientes; 2014: 220 pacientes). El número medio de episodios/paciente osciló entre 1-2 episodios/año y su duración media disminuyó (2007: 323 días; 2014: 202,8 días). Las vías de acceso más utilizadas fueron los catéteres tunelizados y las complicaciones sépticas fueron las más comunes. El coste directo anual medio por paciente se estimó en 8.393,30 € y 9.261,60 € para patología benigna y maligna, respectivamente. Considerando que, en 2014, 220 pacientes requirieron NPD, el coste anual fue 1.846.524,96 € (1.389.910,55 € debidos a la fórmula de NPD) y 2.037.551,90 € (1.580.937,50 € debidos a la fórmula de NPD) para patología benigna y maligna respectivamente. Conclusiones: estos resultados sirven de base para futuros análisis económicos de la NPD y para establecer estrategias de priorización eficiente de recursos disponibles.

Nutrición enteral domiciliaria en la Región de Murcia. Perfil de la muestra, evolución del coste y perspectiva. Años 2007-2010.

Introducción: en Murcia, y hasta 2010, la administración de la nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED) dictaba cumplir la regulación marcada en cuanto a los facultativos con competencias para su prescripción.Objetivos: examinar aspectos esenciales de este recurso en el periodo 2007-2010, características de la muestra y evolución del coste, así como perspectivas de futuro.Métodos: estudio del perfil de la población NED en un área de salud específica. Selección de recetas facturadas de productos NED en el conjunto de la Región, clasificación por tipos y análisis de la evolución en importe y en envases para el periodo 2007-2010.Resultados: respecto al perfil de la muestra del Área I de Salud de la Región, la patología, vía de administración y tipo de nutrición más frecuentes resultaron, respectivamente, la enfermedad neurológica, la vía oral y la nutrición no específica. Por otro lado, el gasto sanitario en productos dietoterápicos, en el Servicio Murciano de Salud, aumentó alrededor del 50% entre los años 2007 y 2010. Tanto en envases como en importe, Murcia se sitúa por encima de la media nacional.Conclusiones: el perfil de la muestra no coincide con trabajos publicados en otras regiones. Este dato, junto a la posición de Murcia en gasto dietoterápico, y su evidente tendencia al alza en los años analizados, hace evidente la necesidad de medidas que mejoren la calidad de la NED en la Región de Murcia y, en caso de ser posible, conseguir alcanzar valores nacionales en relación con el consumo medio y el gasto.

[Is older age a limit factor when considering health resources? The case of home parenteral nutrition]. / ¿Es la edad un factor limitante en la distribución de recursos?: Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria en el paciente anciano.

UNLABELLED: Some bioethicists consider older age as a limiting factor for receiving special medical care. Older adults comprise the majority of home enteral nutrition patients (neoplams of the head, neck, and upper gastrointestinal tract neuromuscular swallowing disorders, dementia, etc) On the contrary, there are very few data on Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) in the elderly. We report these of a 75 years old man affected from a severe short bowel syndrome due to mesenteric thrombosis. After a hospital stay of two months he was sent home on HPN. His current caregiver was her wife, a 72 year old woman suffering from incipient Parkinson's disease. HPN lasted for 11 years and was stopped because of clinical deterioration. During this time he presented 5 catheter- related infections (1.3 episodes/1,000 days). 5 catheters were used (average length 788 days). He was hospitalized four times because of HPN complications. Functional status was maintained along almost all the length of HPN. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complications in this patient was similar to other groups of age receiving HPN. The technique was not burdensome for the family. Older age cannot be consider, by itself a limiting factor when receiving long term nutritional support.

Benchmarking home parenteral nutrition in Scotland and New Zealand: disparities revealed.

AIM: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) remains the treatment of choice for severe intestinal failure. These patients are few in number but consume significant resource in funding and personnel. Patients receiving HPN in Scotland and New Zealand (NZ) are both tracked through HPN registers which enable clinical audit for identifying important variations in practice. Scotland and NZ have similar demographics, healthcare systems, and populations (Scotland 5.1 million, NZ 4.1 million). METHODS: The HPN registers for Scotland and New Zealand for 2005 were examined for patients who received HPN during 2005 together with the diagnostic category identified (ICD-10) that resulted in provision of HPN. RESULTS: The diagnostic categories for the 2005 HPN patients were similar in both countries but rates of provision were much higher in Scotland (71 patients vs 14 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar demographics, healthcare systems, and population size, HPN is utilised to a significantly lesser extent in NZ. The reasons for this are not clear. However, it is possible that there is a lack of recognition of the need for HPN and/or under provision of HPN, which may lead to poorer treatment outcomes.

Examination of factors that lead to complications for new home parenteral nutrition patients.

Home parenteral nutrition carries a risk of infectious, metabolic, and mechanical complications that cause significant morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the incidence and the causative factors of these complications that occur within the first 90 days after discharge from the hospital to home. Data were prospectively collected and analyzed for 97 adult patients. A complication developed in one third of the patients, and the majority required rehospitalization. Infectious complications were the most prevalent, followed by mechanical and then metabolic complications. The authors describe their methods of collecting data in a quantifiable manner with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

Review of home paediatric parenteral nutrition on the UK.

Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an expensive technological development which has given life to children with chronic intestinal failure. However, HPN is a complex therapy which carries life-threatening risks. The British Artificial Nutrition Survey (BANS), launched in 1996, monitors and audits HPN in the UK. It is the largest ongoing survey in the world, reviewing patients receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition. Data collated from health professionals between June 1996 and September 1999 identified 81 children who were registered. The commonest diagnosis for starting HPN was short-bowel syndrome, with 41% of the children being under the age of 1 year. Readmission rates of children to hospital were reported as less than 2%, suggesting that most of the burden of care is placed on families. Questionnaire data received from families (response rate 38%) identified that sleep disturbance was common. Families also experience a deterioration in their family life. This relates to poor social life activities and overall quality of life after the child had started HPN. Further qualitative research data are required to review the ongoing psychosocial issues for families.

Home enteral and parenteral nutrition in children.

The prevalence of home enteral and parenteral nutrition programmes is rising rapidly all over the world, in children as in adults. Home artificial nutrition, especially parenteral nutrition, is an expensive technology but is life-saving for many patients. The only possible alternative to home treatment is keeping patients in hospital, and cost-benefit studies have demonstrated that home nutrition is about 70% more cost-effective than hospital-based therapy. Although home nutrition is usually considered by children and families to lead to an improvement in their quality of life, the complications of these techniques, including psychological consequences, have to be carefully assessed and prevented.

Community parenteral therapy project: a pilot study.

The pilot study reported in this paper was devised to develop and compare service delivery models that would achieve the provision of high quality parenteral therapy care to patients in the Gold Coast District Health Service community. All data were collected on 113 patients for a 12-month period, January to December 1996. The study compared the provision of outreach nursing services and contracted nursing services on measures of satisfaction and cost. The study showed that patient and carers indicated a preference for community care, medical officers advocated the benefits of administering parenteral therapies in the community, general practitioners were interested in managing future community parenteral therapies, and contracted (nurse) service providers endorsed the development of a parenteral therapy resource centre. The findings also revealed considerable potential cost savings in community-based care.

Home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this Review was to locate, appraise and summarise evidence from scientific studies on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in order to answer specific research questions on the effectiveness of this technology. The following questions were asked. What patients have received HPN? What has been the experience of patients on HPN programmes? How have HPN programmes been organised, and what techniques and equipment have been used, and to what effect? What comparative information is available on effectiveness? What evidence exists for the cost-effectiveness of HPN? What questions about the provision of HPN could be answered with additional research, and what studies would be most suitable? DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive list of studies was provided by an extensive search of electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Uncover, Cinahl, Caredata, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, NTIS, Pascal, Psychlit, and Economic Literature Index), relevant journals (including Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Clinical Nutrition, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition, Clinical Gastroenterology, Nutrition Reviews, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, Nutrition and Cancer, Nutrition and Health, and Journal of Paediatric Nutrition and Metabolism), and scanning of reference lists, as well as other search strategies outlined in the protocol. STUDY SELECTION: Studies relevant to the questions were selected. The inclusion criteria were fairly broad because of the quality of the studies located. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction forms were used to collect data from studies included in the review. The data was checked by a second researcher to reduce error. DATA SYNTHESIS: Quantitative analysis was difficult owing to the type of studies located. The data is discussed in a qualitative manner. Where complication rates have been given, we have attempted to combine the results in a quantitative manner. RESULTS: The age and sex of patients on HPN varies according to the underlying disease but, on the whole, patients are young (see Tables 4a and 4b). There are trends showing an increased use of the technology at the extremes of the age range. There are marked differences between countries on the underlying diseases for which HPN is indicated. For example, many more patients with an underlying malignancy are treated in Italy and the USA than in the UK (40-67% versus 8%). Morbidity rates for the majority of patients are acceptable (see Table 8), the complications tend to be related to the central venous catheter. It is fairly clear that a minority of patients are susceptible to recurrent problems and that many patients have very few complications. The mortality rate for HPN patients (see Table 10) was good for those patients with benign underlying disease (for example, 5% of Crohn's HPN patients die per year), and there are very few reports of patients dying from complications of the technology. The survival of those with malignant disease and AIDS is poor, almost all having died from the underlying disease at one year; despite this, most programme growth worldwide is due to an increase in the numbers of patients with these diagnoses (see Table 5). Quality of life is reasonable for patients with benign disease (see Table 9); no studies were found that examined the quality of life of HPN patients with malignant disease. Economic analysis shows that the cost of HPN treatment is cheaper than the alternative of in-patient care (see Table 18). There is a paucity of comparative studies examining different aspects of the technology, and this accounted for the majority of gaps in the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HPN for benign intestinal failure is supported by evidence from the scientific studies located. There are, however, large gaps in the evidence, particularly relating to the use of HPN in malignant disease and AIDS. A programme of research is suggested at the end of this review.

Home artificial nutrition in advanced cancer.

Attitudes to home artificial nutrition (HAN) in cancer vary greatly from country to country. A 6-year prospective survey of the practice of HAN in advanced cancer patients applied by a hospital-at-home programme in an Italian health district was performed to estimate the utilization rate, to evaluate efficacy in preventing death from cachexia, maintaining patients at home without burdens and distress and improving patients' performance status, and to obtain information about costs. Patients were eligible for HAN when all the following were present: hypophagia; life expectancy 6 weeks or more, suitable patient and family circumstances; and verbal informed consent. From July 1990 to June 1996, 587 patients were evaluated; 164 were selected for HAN (135 enteral and 29 parenteral) and were followed until 31 December 1996. The incidence of HAN per million inhabitants was 18.4 in the first year of activity and 33.2-36.9 in subsequent years, being 4-10 times greater than rates reported by the Italian HAN registers. On 31 December 1996, 158 patients had died because of the disease and 6 were on treatment. Mean survival was 17.2 weeks for those on enteral nutrition and 12.2 weeks for those on parenteral nutrition. Prediction of survival was 72% accurate. 95 patients had undergone 155 readmissions to hospital, where they spent 15-23% of their survival time. Burdens due to HAN were well accepted by 124 patients, an annoyance or scarcely tolerable in the remainder. The frequency of major complications of parenteral nutrition was 0.67 per year for catheter sepsis and 0.16 per year for deep vein thrombosis. Karnofsky performance score increased in only 13 patients and body weight increased in 43. The fixed direct costs per patient-day (in European Currency Units) were 14.2 for the nutrition team, 18.2 for enteral nutrition and 61 for parenteral nutrition. The results indicate that definite entry criteria and local surveys are required for the correct use of HAN in advanced cancer patients, that HAN can be applied without causing additional burdens and distress, and that its costs are not higher than hospital costs.