Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2020 Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Sustainable, Resilient, and Healthy Food and Water Systems.

Current systems of food production and consumption are challenged by factors such as natural resource constraints, relative unaffordability of nutrient-dense foods, persistent social inequities, and high rates of diet-related disease. Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) play a critical role in protecting the health of current and future populations by advancing sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems. By definition, such systems can meet current dietary needs without jeopardizing the ability to meet the needs of future generations; can withstand or adapt to disturbances over time; and can equitably facilitate disease prevention and well-being for all individuals. This area of practice within nutrition and dietetics requires recognition of the complex interrelationships among indiviudal health and economic, environmental, and social domains of food and nutrition, and allows RDNs to bring unique expertise to diverse interprofessional teams. The Revised 2020 Standards of Professional Performance for RDNs (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Sustainable, Resilient, and Healthy Food and Water Systems update the 2014 standards and cover the following 6 standards of professional performance: Quality in Practice, Competence and Accountability, Provision of Services, Application of Research, Communication and Application of Knowledge, and Utilization and Management of Resources. Within each standard, specific indicators provide measurable action statements that illustrate how the RDN can apply the principles of sustainable food systems to a variety of practice settings. The indicators describe 3 skill levels (ie, competent, proficient, and expert) for RDNs in this focus area.

Improved meals service and reduced food waste and costs in medical institutions resulting from employment of a food service dietitian - a case study.

BACKGROUND: A recurring problem in medical institutions is patients not always receiving food meeting their nutritional and medical needs. A proposed contributing factor is non- inclusion of dietitians in food service staff. Recently, positions for food service dietitians in hospitals were created. For the newly defined role of "Food Service Dietitian", comprehensive training courses were developed (70 dietitians participated). OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the addition of the role of a "Food Service Dietitian" in medical institutions on suitability of foods served, food costs and food waste. METHODS: A three years (2014-2017) national case study to examine the new role's impact was carried out, in 18 hospitals, nine of which employ a food service dietitian (intervention), and 9 without (control). The number of nutritional analyses of menus was checked, as was the extent of kitchen staff training, and how often night meals were served for all patients. Data were gathered regarding food costs and waste with respect to food distributed to staff and patients. Food costs savings and waste reduction were calculated, based on reduction in provision of unnecessary meals, at a cost of 18 NIS per day per meal. RESULTS: Kitchen staff training was carried out in all intervention institutions, and not in the controls. In most controls, nutritional analyses were not performed, whereas in the intervention hospitals, full analyses were performed and tailoring of menus to specific department requirements improved significantly. In most intervention hospitals, late night snacks were provided, this not being so in the controls. Total food cost savings of $229,569 per annum was seen in the six intervention hospitals, attributable to 4 factors: 1.Meals not delivered to fasting patients, or those receiving parenteral/enteral nutrition- cost savings of 328,500 NIS ($93,857)2.Better tailoring and monitoring of food delivered to the wards and staff (bread, cheese, milk etc)- annual cost savings of 235,000 NIS ($67,142) in the hospitals with a food service dietitian.3.Checking expiry dates of medical foods, and improved communication between the wards, the kitchen and the food distribution centers, has lessened food waste with savings of 5% from the medical food budget per annum of 40,000 NIS ($11,428).4.As a result of dietitian-performed nutritional analyses, tailoring of food provided according to the patient's medical and nutrition needs was improved. In one hospital, after re-evaluation of serve sizes in high protein diets, sizes were reduced while retaining adequacy, with immediate cost savings of 200,000 NIS ($57,142) per annum. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the new role of Food Service Dietitian led to cost savings and significant improvements in adherence to the nutritional care plan.

Research identified variation in nutrition practice by community prescribing dietitians with regards to the identification and management of malnutrition amongst community dwelling adults.

To improve nutritional outcomes of community dwelling adults with malnutrition we identified three related hypotheses to be tested: i) Southampton Community Prescribing Support Service dietitians achieve 100% compliance with selected standards of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Clinical Guideline (CG) 32, ii) patient service satisfaction amongst community dwelling adults accessing the prescribing support service is high (90%), and iii) nationally, dietitians use weight gain goal >10% and BMI >18.5 kg/m2 as outcome measures from the service phases of prescribing support. A retrospective audit of records of 100 community-dwelling adults accessing local services considered CG32 "Indications for nutrition support in hospital and community standard 1.3.1" and CG32 "Monitoring of nutrition support in hospital and community standard 1.5.6". A questionnaire was distributed to community-dwelling adults (n = 52) accessing the service, in addition to a national survey of dietetic practice. Compliance with standard 1.3.1 was 46% and with standard 1.5.6 it was 82%. The majority of patients (86%; n = 13) reported satisfaction with the support service. Nationally, 89% (n = 51) of dietitians use weight and 87% (n = 50) use BMI as an outcome measure for success of nutritional intervention. All research hypotheses were rejected. These results suggest there is considerable variation in the identification and management of malnutrition amongst community dwelling adults, which may impact on clinical and nutritional outcomes. Future work should consider quality improvement projects to address potential barriers to achieving best practice by community prescribing dietitians through the use of nutrition pathways to support older adults with malnutrition.

Dietetics students' construction of competence through assessment and placement experiences.

AIM: Competency standards are widely adopted as a framework to describe standards of performance required in the workplace. Little is known, however, about how students construct competence. This qualitative study aimed to explore how dietetics students ready to graduate construct the concept of competence and the role of assessment in developing professional competence. METHODS: A qualitative description was used to gather data from a convenience sample of students ready to graduate from universities with accredited dietetics programs across Australia (10 out of 15 at the time of the study). A total of 11 focus groups were conducted to explore perspectives of competence and experiences of 'competency-based' assessment. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: A total of 81 (n = 81) participants across 10 universities representing 22% of total students participated in the focus groups. Themes revealed that: (i) there is no shared understanding of competence; (ii) current work placement experiences may not reflect current standards or workforce needs; (iii) assessment approaches may not fully support the development of competence; and (iv) the competent performance of supervising dietitians/clinical educators in the workplace influences the construction of competence. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to work towards a shared understanding of dietetic entry-level competence in the profession. 'Work-based' learning experiences may need to be modified to ensure students meet current competency standards. Practitioners involved in student supervision need to acknowledge the influential role they have in the development of the future workforce.

Review of Nutrition Screening and Assessment Practices for Long-Term Care Residents.

The older adult population in Canada is growing, creating a greater demand for long-term care (LTC) facilities. Seniors living in LTC are more vulnerable to malnutrition, making it important to implement nutrition screening tools on a routine basis. The purpose of this study was to explore the practices of Registered Dietitians (RDs) related to nutritional screening, nutritional assessment, and follow-ups conducted within LTC facilities. This study also explored possible barriers hindering the application of these practices. Nine RDs from two health regions in Southern Saskatchewan completed a phone interview to address nutrition care practices/policies and barriers in LTC facilities. Results showed a considerable amount of variability in nutrition care practices for screening and assessment with lack of time identified as the greatest barrier. These findings highlight the importance of having consistent policies and a sufficient amount of RDs available in LTC facilities to provide the expected level of nutrition care for residents.

Accuracy and confidence of allied health assistants administering the subjective global assessment on inpatients in a rural setting: a preliminary feasibility study.

AIM: Malnutrition has a significant impact on patient outcomes and duration of inpatient stay. However, conducting timely nutrition assessments can be challenging for rural dietitians. A solution could be for allied health assistants (AHAs) to assist with these assessments. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy and confidence of AHAs trained to conduct the subjective global assessment (SGA) compared with dietitians. METHODS: A non-inferiority study design was adopted. Forty-five adult inpatients admitted to a rural and remote health service were assessed independently by both a trained AHA and dietitian within 24 hours. The order of assessment was randomised, with the second assessor blind to the outcome of the initial SGA. Levels of agreement were examined using kappa and percent exact agreement (PEA; set a priori at ≥80%). Rater confidence after each assessment was assessed using a 10-point scale. RESULTS: Agreement for overall SGA ratings was high (kappa = 0.84; PEA 84.4%). PEA for individual sub-components of the SGA ranged from 66.4 to 86.7%. Where discrepancies were identified in global SGA ratings, AHAs provided a more severe rating of malnutrition than dietitians. AHAs reported significantly lower confidence than dietitians (t = 4.49, P < 0.001), although mean confidence for both groups was quite high (AHA=7.5, dietitians = 9.0). CONCLUSIONS: Trained AHAs completed the SGA with similar accuracy to dietitians. Using AHAs may help facilitate timely nutrition assessment in rural health services when a dietitian is not physically present. Further investigation is required to determine the benefits of incorporating this extended role into rural and remote health-care services.

O nutricionista e a gestão de qualidade de alimentos em serviços de alimentação

A qualidade dos alimentos tem sido cada vez mais monitorada em relação à segurança, tornando indispensável à adoção do controle higienicossanitário. O Nutricionista Responsável Técnico é o profissional habilitado que assume o planejamento, organização, direção, supervisão e avaliação de serviços de alimentação e nutrição. Sendo assim, este estudo objetivou ressaltara importância da atuação deste profissional como promotor de saúde em relação à gestão higienicossanitária em unidades de alimentação. Foi realizada uma pesquisa qualitativa, descritiva, em seis restaurantes comerciais, selecionados aleatoriamente, situados na Região Metropolitana do Recife, relacionando-os à presença do Nutricionista de acordo com a avaliação das condições higienicossanitárias do local. Os dados foram coletados através do checklist,constante no anexo II da RDC n° 275/2002, da ANVISA, enfocando cinco blocos: edificação e instalações; equipamentos, móveis e utensílios; manipuladores; produção e transporte; documentação. Para cada item houve três possibilidades de resposta: "sim", "não" e "não aplicável". Os estabelecimentos que possuíam nutricionista foram nomeados Restaurantes 1A, 2A e 3A e os que não possuíam nutricionista, identificados por Restaurantes 1B, 2B e 3B e classificados, de acordo com a adequação dos itens, em: Grupo I (76 a 100%), Grupo II (51 a 75%) e Grupo III (0 a 50%). Os resultados mostraram que os Restaurantes que tinham nutricionista foram classificados no Grupo I e os que não tinham responsável técnico foram classificados no Grupo 3. A presença do nutricionista é um diferencial para garantir uma alimentação com qualidade nutricional e higienicossanitária.

Food quality has been increasingly monitored in relation to its safety, making it essential the adoption of sanitary-hygienic contraI. The Technical Manager Nutritionist is the professional habilitated for the planning, organization, direction, supervision and evaluation of nutrition and food services. Therefore, this study aims to emphasize the importance of the rale of the nutritionist as a healthcare promoter in relation to the hygienic-sanitary management in food units. We conducted a descriptive, qualitative research in six commercial restaurants, randomly selected, located in Recife metropolitan region, relating them to the presence of Nutritionist according to the evaluation of hygienic-sanitary conditions of the place. Data were collected through checklist contained in Annex II from RDC n° 275/2002, ANVISA, focusing on five blocks: building and facilities, equipment, furniture and utensils; handlers; production and transportation; documentation. For each item there were three possible answers: "yes", "no" and "not applicable". Establishments who had a nutritionist were named Restaurants 1A, 2A and 3A and those who had no nutritionist, identified by Restaurants 1B, 2B and 3B, and classified according to the adequacy of the items in Group I (76 to 100%), Group II (51 to 75%) and Group III (0-50%). The results showed that those Restaurants who had a nutritionist were classified in Group I and those without technical manager were classified in Group III. The presence of a nutritionist is a differential to assure a meal with nutritional and hygienic-sanitary quality.

Using Academy Standards of Excellence in Nutrition and Dietetics for organization self-assessment and quality improvement.

Standards of Excellence in Nutrition and Dietetics for an Organization is a self-assessment tool to measure and evaluate an organization's program, services, and initiatives that identify and distinguish the Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) brand as the professional expert in food and nutrition. The Standards of Excellence will serve as a road map to recognize RDNs as leaders and collaborators. Standards of Excellence criteria apply to all practice segments of nutrition and dietetics: health care, education and research, business and industry, and community nutrition and public health. Given the membership's call to action to be recognized for their professional expertise, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee developed four Standards of Excellence in Nutrition and Dietetics for Organizations: Quality of Leadership, Quality of Organization, Quality of Practice, and Quality of Outcomes. Within each standard, specific indicators provide strategies for an organization to demonstrate excellence. The Academy will develop a self-evaluation scoring tool to assist the organization in applying and implementing one or more of the strategies in the Standards of Excellence indicators. The organization can use the self-assessment tool to establish itself as a Center of Excellence in Nutrition and Dietetics. The role examples illustrate initiatives RDNs and organizations can take to identify themselves as a Center of Excellence in Nutrition and Dietetics. Achieving the Excellence level is an important collaborative initiative between nutrition and dietetics organizations and the Academy to provide increased autonomy, supportive management, respect within peers and community, opportunities for professional development, support for further education, and compensation for the RDN. For purposes of the Standards, "organization" means workplace or practice setting.