Nutritional assessment in a maxillectomy patient from the preoperative period to definitive obturator insertion: A case report.

PATIENT: A 69-year-old Japanese male with squamous cell carcinoma of the right maxilla (T4M0N0) was referred to our department for a preoperative examination. An immediate surgical obturator was fabricated before surgery. He underwent surgical treatment, which included right subtotal maxillectomy and reconstruction with a split skin graft. One week postoperatively, the immediate surgical obturator was modified to expand the nasal cavity for obturator prosthesis. Oral intake was started 12 days postoperatively with an immediate surgical obturator in situ. The definitive obturator was fabricated after the wound surface had healed 8 months postoperatively. Assessment of the nutritional status included body mass index, serum albumin level, resting energy expenditure (REE) measured using indirect calorimetry, and predicted REE using the Harris-Benedict equation. These assessments were performed several times, from the time of admission until the definitive obturator was applied. DISCUSSION: Malnutrition occurs frequently in patients with head and neck cancer because this region is vital for swallowing and mastication. Maxillectomy patients require a maxillofacial prosthesis to improve their nutritional status from the preoperative period to recovery. This case report describes maxillofacial prosthetic treatment from the perspective of nutrition. The patient wore the immediate surgical obturator postoperatively, which was followed by marked weight loss after restoration, and then weight gain returned to the normal range when wearing the definitive obturator. CONCLUSION: Maxillofacial prosthetic treatments should make efforts to maintain nutritional status and achieve optimal function and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers.

Time-Driven, Activity-Based Costing of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics: A Critical Component of Establishing Value of Latham Appliance and Nasoalveolar Molding.

BACKGROUND: Value-based health-care reform requires assessment of outcomes and costs of medical interventions. In cleft care, presurgical infant orthopedics is still being evaluated for clinical benefits and risks; however, the cost of these procedures has been largely ignored. This study uses robust accounting methods to quantify the cost of providing two types of presurgical infant orthopedics: Latham appliance treatment and nasoalveolar molding. METHODS: This is a prospective study of patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate who underwent treatment with presurgical infant orthopedics from 2017 to 2019 at two academic centers. Costs were measured using time-driven activity-based costing. Personnel costs, facility costs (operating room, clinic, and inpatient ward), and equipment costs were included. Travel expenses were incorporated as an estimate of direct costs borne by the family, but indirect costs (e.g., time off from work) were not considered. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated with Latham appliance treatment and 14 were treated with nasoalveolar molding. For Latham appliance treatment, average total cost was $7553 per patient ($1041 for personnel, $637 for equipment, $4871 for facility, and $1004 for travel over 6.5 visits). Unilateral and bilateral costs were $6891 and $8860, respectively. For nasoalveolar molding, average cost totaled $2541 ($364 for personnel, $151 for equipment, $300 for facility, and $1726 for travel over 13 visits); $2120 for unilateral and $3048 for bilateral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The major difference in cost is attributable to operative placement of the Latham device. Travel cost for nasoalveolar molding is often higher because of frequent clinical encounters required. Future investigation should focus on whether outcomes achieved by presurgical infant orthopedics justify the $2100 to $8900 expenditure for these adjunctive procedures.

Strategic use of obturator prostheses for the rehabilitation of oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the current pandemic scenario, maxillofacial rehabilitation specialists involved with supportive care in cancer must transform its practice to cope with COVID-19 and improve protocols that could quickly return the oral function of complex cancer patients who cannot wait for surgical complex rehabilitation. This includes the role of the maxillofacial prosthodontist for the rehabilitation of surgically treated patients with maxillary cancers by the means of filling obturator prostheses that are considered an optimal scientific-based strategy to reduce hospital stay with excellent pain control, oral function (speech, swallowing, mastication, and facial esthetics), psychologic and quality of life outcomes for the patients following intraoral cancer resection. Therefore, the aim of this commentary was to bring new lights to the strategic use of obturator prostheses for the rehabilitation of oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to present a protocol for managing such cases.

Abordagem odontológica com obturador palatino imediato em um paciente portador de tumor neuroectodérmico melanótico da infância: relato de caso / Dental strategy with immediate palatal obturator in a patient with melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy: case report

O objetivo do presente artigo é relatar a abordagem odontológica com obturador palatino imediato diferenciado em um caso clínico de tumor neuroectodérmico melanótico da infância, ocorrido no Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, realizando uma revisão da literatura e abordando o atendimento multidisciplinar como garantia do cuidado integral ao paciente. Lactente, 4 meses, sexo masculino, tumoração em maxila esquerda, foi encaminhado à seção de Odontologia para confecção de obturador palatino com projeção maxilar. O paciente que é submetido a um tratamento mutilador na tentativa de cura de alguma neoplasia de cabeça e pescoço necessita de conforto, bem-estar e um cuidado integral da equipe multidisciplinar, sendo o cirurgião-dentista parte dessa equipe.

The aim of this paper is to report a dental strategy with a differentiated immediate palatal obturator in a case of melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy, held at the National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva, by performing a literature review and addressing the multidisciplinary treatment as a guarantee of integral care for the patient. Infant, 4 months, male, tumor in the left maxilla, was referred to the Odontology section for a palatal obturator confection with maxillary projection. The patient who is submitted to a mutilating treatment in an attempt to cure any head and neck neoplasm needs comfort, wellness and integral care from the multidisciplinary team, being the dentist part of it.

Changes in nose symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by differing pre-surgical assistance: An objective assessment of primary repair.

BACKGROUND: Residual deformity of the nose, not lip, continues to be the greater challenge in UCCLP rehabilitation. Platform distortions often re-emerge following primary reconstruction revealing the stereotypical cleft-nose. Nasal alveolar molding reduces nose asymmetry. However, this study applies directional mechanics to the underlying platform distortions and soft tissue nose, introducing a novel device addressing the distorted septo-premaxillary junction. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 47 UCCLP patients by 2-dimensional photographic analysis with 24 subjects treated by dento-maxillary advancement (DMA) and nasal septum button-head pin (NSBP), 17 having nasal molding (NM), compared to 23 subjects without nose treatment, 16 with DMA and 7 with passive plates. Measurements were assessed by t tests, ≤ 05 confidence. RESULTS: Frontal view: nose-treatment sample achieved ideal ala-bases vertical symmetry (p = 0.00065 & 0.00073); significantly improved ala-rims "slump" angle (p = 0.0071). Both samples had nose positioning within the facial frame like non-cleft population. Sub-nasal view: significant differences were for columella angle (p = 0.0015), nares "offset" (p = 0.002), and columella symmetry (p = 0.022) with nose-treatment achieving near ideal columella symmetry score (0.92) vs. (0.81). CONCLUSIONS: NM and the novel NSBP procedures integrated with the platform correction effect of the DMA successfully treated at three distorted anatomic-levels native to UCCLP to improve nasal aesthetics.

Tratamiento ortopédico prequirúrgico Dynacleft y conformador nasal en pacientes con fisura labio palatina unilateral completa tratados en Fundación Gantz, Santiago, Chile / Dynacleft presurgical orthopedic treatment and nasal conformer in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, treated at the Gantz Foundation, Santiago, Chile

Introducción: La Fundación Gantz utiliza como tratamiento de ortopedia prequirúrgica en pacientes fisurados, el parche Dynacleft y conformador nasal. Para ello, se realizó un estudio para constatar las características generales que conlleva este tratamiento, las instrucciones hacia los padres y las posibles complicaciones. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una encuesta a 57 apoderados de pacientes con fisura labio-palatina unilateral completa, tratados con Dynacleft y conformador nasal. Resultados: en cuanto al parche Dynacleft, la duración fue de 2,5 días con o sin uso de parche anexo. Su principal causa de recambio era que al mojarse, perdía sus propiedades de adhesión y resistencia y la mayoría de los encuestados afirma que su uso mejora el procedimiento de alimentación. Con respecto a la apreciación de los padres de ambos tratamientos, mayoritariamente afirman un resultado estético excelente. Si bien presentan buena tolerancia, en ambos tratamientos hay complicaciones. Discusión: es importante enfatizar el uso del parche Dynacleft en la alimentación y mantener, en lo posible, un ambiente seco para su mayor duración y no utilizar un parche anexo, ya que éste sólo interfiere en el tratamiento. Algunas sugerencias para evitar la desinserción del conformador nasal son el uso de cinta micropore sobre la nariz y/o la inmovilización de los brazos del lactante. En caso del parche Dynacleft, el tratamiento para evitar la irritación de la piel es mediante parches protectores. Concusión. gracias a este estudio podemos realizar de mejor forma nuestros tratamientos y así obtener mejores resultados

Presurgical infant orthopedics.

This article focuses on current practices and controversy in the area of presurgical infant orthopedics in patients born with cleft lip and palate.

Felt needs of parents who have a 0- to 3-month-old child with a cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the felt needs of parents who have children from birth to 3 months of age with a cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: Parents were interviewed using structured and semistructured questions at 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after birth. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen parents, including 12 mothers and three fathers, of patients with cleft lip and palate aged 0 to 3 months were interviewed. RESULTS: During the first week after birth, the majority of parents needed to know about feeding and surgery. At 1, 2, and 3 months after birth, more information was required, especially on different surgeries during those periods and speech problems. In addition, a number of parents requested funding for every period, and very few had expectations of moral support from health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The felt needs expressed in this study changed according to periods of time and mainly concerned feeding, speech problems, and surgery, as well as financial support. The needs of parents, particularly during the transitional period, should be considered as a provision of holistic care for patients with cleft lip and palate and their families.

Subjective assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers.

PURPOSE: Assessments of masticatory performance and occlusal force for wearers of obturator prostheses were performed as clinical objective assessments and reported in an earlier study. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinically the chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by self-evaluations and to examine their relationship to the objective assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with maxillofacial obturator prostheses who were having a periodic checkup at the maxillofacial rehabilitation clinic in Kyushu University Hospital were recruited for this study. Chewing function was evaluated by 3 assessment tools: a self-assessment mastication scale, a chewing function score, and a mastication score. In addition, correlations among these assessments and objective tests--ie, masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force--were analyzed by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean self-assessment mastication scale was 63.2 (SD 31.8), the chewing function score was 54.0 (SD 30.2), and the mastication score was 51.4 (SD 33.3). There was no statistically significant relationship between the self-assessment mastication scale and each objective test. However, there were significant correlations between each semisubjective score--the chewing function score and the mastication score--and masticatory performance. There was no relationship between each semisubjective score and maximum occlusal force. CONCLUSION: A self-assessment mastication scale was not always in agreement with objective assessments, and assessments made by patients should be taken into consideration when arranging maxillofacial rehabilitation. Conversely, both chewing function and mastication scores corresponded with masticatory performance, and these would be useful as screening tests before performing objective tests.

Assessment of cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction and either primary bone grafts, gingivoperiosteoplasty, or without alveolar grafting procedures.

The effects of alveolar grafting on the development of the craniofacial complex have been reported by numerous investigators. The reported results vary in the literature from significant to very little impediment of maxillary growth. The present work evaluates and compares facial form at age six years in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction and primary reconstruction with (1) primary bone grafts (n = 14), (2) gingivoperiosteoplasty (n = II), or (3) without alveolar grafting procedures at the time of lip repair (n = 13). The cohort groups were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOV A). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the three groups for only one of the 12 parameters analyzed. The primary bone grafted group demonstrated less vertical descent-of the anterior maxilla compared to the gingivoperiosteoplasty and non-grafted groups (P = .0027).

Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force.

PURPOSE: Eating, which includes chewing and swallowing, is an oral function that influences quality of life. Though the swallowing ability of maxillectomy patients was reported in our previous study, the chewing function has not been fully reported to date. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by measurement of masticatory performance and occlusal force. The relationship of these 2 measurements was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty maxillofacial obturator prosthesis wearers undergoing periodic checkup at the maxillofacial rehabilitation clinic in Kyushu University Hospital were recruited for this study. Additionally, 20 young, healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Data on masticatory performance, which was measured by a sieve method using hydrocolloid material, and maximum occlusal force, which was measured by the Dental Prescale System (Fuji Film), were obtained for each participant. RESULTS: The mean of masticatory performance was 2.6 (SD 1.2) on a 1.40-mm mesh. There was no significant difference in masticatory performance between the patient group and the controls. The mean maximum occlusal force of the patient group was 625.9 N (SD 299.1 N), which was significantly lower than that of the control group. There was no significant correlation between masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force for the patient group in this study (P = .3726). CONCLUSION: Masticatory performance of obturator prosthesis wearers with dentate or partially edentulous maxillae was not different from that of young, healthy individuals, though maximum occlusal force of these patients was lower than that of controls.

Objective clinical assessment of change in swallowing ability of maxillectomy patients when wearing obturator prostheses.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of treatment outcome is important in maxillofacial rehabilitation. Although eating is one of the oral functions that most strongly influences patients' quality of life, only a few reports exist on the objective assessment of swallowing for maxillectomy patients. The purpose of this study was to identify changes in the swallowing ability of maxillectomy patients when wearing obturator prostheses through the use of an objective clinical assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The swallowing ability of 38 postmaxillectomy patients consecutively treated with obturator prostheses was objectively evaluated with the "water-drinking test" that was developed for the assessment of dysphagia patients after cerebrovascular disease. In this test, the subjects were instructed to drink 30 mL of water in one swallow. The profile was evaluated with the combination of the time required for drinking the water and the incidence of cough reflex. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the paired t test, and the Chi-square test with StatView 5.0 for the Macintosh. RESULTS: Performance improved significantly when the patients wore prostheses (P = .0026, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The mean drinking times without and with prostheses were 8.2 +/- 6.3 s and 5.0 +/- 3.5 s, respectively. Drinking time was shortened significantly when the prosthesis was worn (P = .0002, paired t test). The assessment of behavior and episodes revealed that the swallowing ability of the maxillectomy patients was significantly improved when a prosthesis was worn (P = .0002, Chi-square test). CONCLUSION: The swallowing ability of maxillectomy patients was quantitatively and qualitatively improved with obturator prostheses.

Oral health needs of the head and neck radiotherapy patient: 1. Epidemiology, effects of radiotherapy and role of the GDP in diagnosis.

UNLABELLED: Head and neck cancer represents a heterogeneous group of neoplasms affecting a number of sites in the aerodigestive tract, histologically primarily epithelial in type. Most are sensitive to a treatment regime of ablative surgery followed by radiotherapy. The incidence in Ireland of head and neck cancers is approximately 11.8 per 100,000 population and is the 8th commonest cancer in males and the 16th in females. Many of these cancers will manifest with oral signs and symptoms thus placing the GDP in the unique position of being able to detect and positively influence outcomes: the GDP also has a vital, proactive role to play in supportive care before, during and following surgery and radiotherapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The aim of this paper is to review the rationale for the different treatment modalities and the oral/dental side-effects of each.

Reconstruction of extensive maxillary defects using zygomaticus implants.

PURPOSE: Maxillary reconstruction after maxillectomy remains a great challenge for the reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgeon. This article is a clinical retrospective analysis of patients reconstructed with zygomaticus implants after maxillary ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The design of the study was a retrospective review of 9 patients requiring near-total or total maxillectomy for pathologic reasons. Clinical records, photographs, and radiographs were studied. Financial billing statements were reviewed to determine charges for implant reconstruction and method of payment. RESULTS: Maxillary reconstruction using zygomaticus and standard endosseous implants was performed in 9 patients. Maxillary resection was performed for the following reasons: salivary gland malignancy (n = 2), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 5), maxillary mucormycosis (n = 1), and extensive maxillary atrophy and infection secondary to subperiosteal maxillary implant placement (n = 1). A total of 28 zygomaticus implants and 10 standard endosseous implants were used to reconstruct the 9 patients. Six zygomaticus implants and 3 standard endosseous implants failed. The time of zygomaticus implant placement ranged from placement at the time of resection to 3.2 years after the resection. Five patients received radiation therapy. Five patients have been reconstructed with a maxillary obturator and have been functioning with the prosthesis for a minimum of 2 years. CONCLUSION: The combination of zygomaticus and standard endosseous implants can be used to reliably reconstruct patients after extensive resection of the maxilla.

Cost-effectiveness of infant orthopedic treatment regarding speech in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a randomized three-center trial in the Netherlands (Dutchcleft).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of infant orthopedic treatment (IO), compared with no such treatment in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) focusing on the effects on speech development at age 2.5 years. DESIGN: In a three-center prospective, randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft), two groups of children with complete UCLP were followed longitudinally: one group was treated with IO based on a modified Zurich approach in the first year of life (IO group) and the other group did not receive this treatment (non-IO group). PATIENTS: The participants had complete UCLP without soft tissue bands or other malformations. They were born at term and their parents were native Dutch speakers. OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of IO on speech development at age 2.5 years was measured blindly by five expert listeners judging the "total impression of speech quality" on a 10-point equal-appearing interval scale. Costs were measured from a societal viewpoint in Euro. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The IO group (n = 10) obtained a statistically significant higher rating, compared with the non-IO group (n = 10). The effect size was large, indicating that the improvement may be considered a clinically important change. The cost for treatment by the orthodontist was higher in the IO group. For both groups, the mean cost was related to the mean rating for "total impression of speech quality." The resulting cost-effectiveness for IO, compared to non-IO was 1041 for 1.34 point speech quality improvement. The financial investment that is necessary to obtain this improvement seems limited. Thus, from the perspective of speech development, the cost-effectiveness of IO over non-IO seems acceptable at this point in time.

A randomized prospective clinical trial of the effect of infant orthopedics in unilateral cleft lip and palate: prevention of collapse of the alveolar segments (Dutchcleft).

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of infant orthopedics (IO) on maxillary arch form and position of the alveolar segments. DESIGN: Prospective two-arm randomized, controlled trial in parallel with three participating academic cleft palate centers. Treatment was assigned by means of a computerized balanced allocation method. SETTING: Cleft palate centers of Amsterdam, Nijmegen, and Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and no other malformations. INTERVENTIONS: One group (IO+) wore passive maxillary plates during the first year of life; the other group (IO-) did not. All other interventions were the same. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The presence of contact and/or overlap (collapse) between the maxillary segments at maxillary casts made shortly after birth, at 15, 24, 48, 58, and 78 weeks. Survival experience of contact and collapse with time as well as the frequencies of different arch forms and severity of collapse were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparable arch forms with no contact or overlap of the maxillary segments were seen at birth in both groups. With time the frequency of collapse increased, with no significant differences between groups. No significant group differences were found with respect to the survival experience of contact and collapse or for the severity of collapse at the end of the observational period. CONCLUSIONS: Infant orthopedics does not prevent collapse and can be abandoned as a tool to improve maxillary arch form.

Use of technopolymer clasps in prostheses for patients due to have radiation therapy.

Patients with large oral defects as a result of a maxillectomy procedure, who are due to have postoperative radiotherapy, need to have the density of the defect restored to ensure standardised radiation distribution. This is achieved with various types of boluses that often require tissue surface positioning stents to help support them. Traditional metal-clasp retained stents were discarded as the clasps caused backscatter of the radiation beams. A radiolucent material was needed to retain these prostheses. Dental D, an acetal resin was used in the fabrication of a positioning stent. It was assessed in terms of ease of manufacture, cost, fit, retention and radiolucency. The material was found to be more costly and time-consuming to manufacture than conventional metal-retained acrylic resin prostheses, but its radiolucency made it ideal for use in patients during radiotherapy treatment. Future studies will determine if the long-term strength of the material will allow the clasps to be used in a definitive prosthesis and thus help offset the initial time and costs.

Conversion of an interim into a definitive speech aid: a predictable approach.

In patients with partial or total soft palatectomy, an interim prosthesis generally is inserted as soon as possible after surgery. Over the average postoperative healing period of 3 months, numerous clinical appointments are needed to shape the prosthesis. When the definitive prosthesis is completed, reshaping the pharyngeal portion of the speech aid unnecessarily involves duplication of work by the clinician. A laboratory procedure is described that can save clinic time, increase cost-effectiveness, and shift work normally performed by the maxillofacial prosthodontist to the maxillofacial laboratory technician. This technique is particularly useful with prostheses that are difficult to shape because of trismus or lack of residual lateral and posterior pharyngeal movement.

Nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty versus alveolar bone graft: an outcome analysis of costs in the treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the financial impact of two treatment approaches to the unilateral cleft alveolus. The recently advocated nasoalveolar molding (NAM; and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP; at the time of lip repair were compared with the traditional approach of secondary alveolar bone graft. DESIGN: The records of all patients (n = 30) with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus treated by a single surgeon during 1985 through 1988 were examined retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 patients (n = 14) were treated by lip repair, primary nasal repair, and secondary alveolar bone graft prior to eruption of permanent dentition; group 2 patients (n = 16) were treated by NAM, GPP, lip repair, and primary nasal repair. Patients who required secondary alveolar bone graft after GPP were noted. The cost of treatment by each protocol was calculated in 1998 dollars. RESULTS: The average cost of treatment for a patient treated by lip repair, primary nasal repair, and secondary alveolar bone graft prior to eruption of permanent dentition was $22,744. Of the 16 patients treated by NAM, GPP, lip repair, and primary nasal repair, 10 required no further treatment of the unilateral cleft alveolus; six patients required secondary alveolar bone graft. The average per-patient treatment cost in this group was $19,745. The average cost savings of NAM and GPP, compared with alveolar bone graft is $2999. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus by nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty results in substantial cost savings, compared with treatment by secondary alveolar bone graft.

A randomised prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft).

Aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of infant orthopaedics (IO) on maxillary dimensions in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The study design was a prospective two-arm randomised controlled trial in parallel with three participating academic Cleft Palate Centres. Treatment was assigned by means of a computerised balanced allocation method. One group (IO+) wore passive maxillary plates during the first year of life, the other group (IO-) did not. Maxillary casts, made at birth, and at 15, 24, 48, 78 wk were digitised three-dimensionally. Before lip closure alveolar, midpalatal and posterior cleft width reduced significantly more in IO(+) than in IO(-). After lip closure, the alveolar cleft width reduced significantly more in IO(-). Until soft palate closure the slope of the palatal vault flattened significantly by IO. It is concluded that IO only has a temporary effect on maxillary arch dimensions that does not last beyond surgical soft palate closure. Therefore, infant orthopaedics as a tool to improve maxillary arch form could be abandoned. However, other outcome variables like facial and dental appearance, speech outcome, and cost-effectiveness need to be investigated further in order to assess the comprehensive effect of infant orthopaedics.