A review of a child population dental preventive programme in Halton and St Helens.

INTRODUCTION: An evaluation was undertaken to measure the dental health of five cohorts of 5-year-old children living in Halton and St Helens, each cohort having had a different length of time they were exposed to a population dental prevention programme before their fifth birthday. METHOD: The dental health of each of five consecutive cohorts of 5-year-old children was measured epidemiologically using standardised methods. RESULTS: The mean level of active decay (dt) in the cohort that had the greatest exposure to the preventive intervention (cohort 5, 2011/12) was 0.83, whereas the mean level of active decay in the cohort with no exposure to the preventive programme (cohort 1, 2007/8) was 1.07. This represents a reduction of 22% in the mean level of active decay in 5-year-olds. There was also a 5.9% absolute increase in the number of 5-year-old children free from decay experience between cohorts 5 and 1. Children living in Halton and St Helens with postcodes in the more socially deprived index of multiple deprivation (IMD) tertiles gained the most from the programme. Comparing cohort 5 and cohort 1, the increase in the proportion of children free from decay was greatest in IMD tertiles 1 and 2 and least in IMD tertile 3 (least socially disadvantaged). CONCLUSION: Following a four-year population dental preventive programme the dental health of 5-year-old children living in Halton and St Helens has improved and dental health inequalities have reduced. As there was no control group, the effects seen are associative and cannot be assumed to be causative.

Economic evaluation of preventive dental programs: what can they tell us?

The role of public health program planners is to determine the effectiveness of public health programs, what recommendations should be made, what future initiatives should be taken, and what policies should be developed. At a basic level, to choose between competing alternatives, two characteristics of an intervention must be considered; these are its outcome and its cost. Based on cost and outcome, planners must select the option that offers the most advantages. Economic evaluation is commonly adopted by decision makers in the health sector to investigate the effectiveness of public health programs and to help plan future initiatives. Economic evaluation assists decision makers who must weigh the information it provides in the context of many and often competing options. In this way, an economic evaluation is an aid to decision making rather than the decision itself. Economic evaluation is becoming essential for informed decision making, with potential implications for public health policy and practice and for clinical practice too. While economic evaluations are commonly used in decision-making processes about health programs, few examples exist in the oral health literature. In the case of preventive oral health programs, economic analysis is often difficult, largely because it makes demands on epidemiological and demographic data that are hard to meet. This study will address the concepts and tools required to conduct economic evaluations of prevention programs. The emphasis will be on oral health and preventive dental programs, although the concepts presented could be useful for other public health programs by practitioners and managers with the aim of producing effective and efficient oral health programs.

Child dental neglect: is it a neglected area in the UK?

This commentary focuses on the condition of dental neglect (DN) in children in the UK. It is divided into three sections: the first section defines DN in children and its consequences, the second section discusses who may be responsible for dental diseases in children as a result of neglect and the third section proposes a holistic approach to address DN in children in the UK.

Geo-mapping of time trends in childhood caries risk--a method for assessment of preventive care.

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is unevenly distributed within populations with a higher burden in low socio-economy groups. Several attempts have been made to allocate resources to those that need them the most; there is a need for convenient approaches to population-based monitoring of caries risk over time. The aim of this study was to develop the geo-map concept, addressing time trends in caries risk, and demonstrate the novel approach by analyzing epidemiological data from preschool residents in the region of Halland, Sweden. METHODS: The study population consisted of 9,973 (2006) and 10,927 (2010) children between 3 to 6 years of age (~77% of the eligible population) from whom caries data were obtained. Reported dmfs>0 for a child was considered as the primary caries outcome. Each study individual was geo-coded with respect to his/her residence parish (66 parishes in the region). Smoothed caries risk geo-maps, along with corresponding statistical certainty geo-maps, were produced by using the free software Rapid Inquiry Facility and the ESRI® ArcGIS system. Parish-level socioeconomic data were available. RESULTS: The overall proportion of caries-free (dmfs=0) children improved from 84.0% in 2006 to 88.6% in 2010. The ratio of maximum and minimum (parish-level) smoothed relative risks (SmRRs) increased from 1.76/0.44=4.0 in 2006 to 2.37/0.33=7.2 in 2010, which indicated an increased geographical polarization of early childhood caries in the population. Eight parishes showed evidential, positional changes in caries risk between 2006 and 2010; their corresponding SmRRs and statistical certainty ranks changed markedly. No considerable parallel changes in parish-level socioeconomic characteristics were seen during the same time period. CONCLUSION: Geo-maps based on caries risk can be used to monitor changes in caries risk over time. Thus, geo-mapping offers a convenient tool for evaluating the effectiveness of tailored health promotion and preventive care in child populations.

QIPP: cutting budgets or working smarter?

The Department of Health's response to the national budget deficit is to ensure that the provision of NHS services is guided by four fundamental 'QIPP' principles: Quality, Innovation, Prevention, and Productivity. This agenda will govern all aspects of the National Health Service's (NHS') health care provision for the foreseeable future. NHS dental services will, like all other NHS services, need to make a contribution to the QIPP agenda. The purpose of this paper is to outline the implications for NHS dentistry.

Attributes of an ideal oral health care system.

OBJECTIVES: The sense of urgency concerning the inadequacies of the current U.S. oral health care system in better preventing oral diseases, eliminating oral health disparities, and ensuring access to basic oral health services has increased in recent years. This paper sought to articulate the attributes that an ideal oral health care system would possess, which would be consistent with the principles of the leading authorities on the public's health. METHODS: The authors reviewed policy statements and position papers of the World Health Organization, The Institute of Medicine, The American Public Health Association, Healthy People 2010 Objectives for the Nation, and the American Association of Public Health Dentistry. RESULTS: Consistent with leading public health authorities, an ideal oral health care system would be have the following attributes: integration with the rest of the health care system; emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention; monitoring of population oral health status and needs; evidence-based; effective; cost-effective; sustainable; equitable; universal; comprehensive; ethical; includes continuous quality assessment and assurance; culturally competent; and empowers communities and individuals to create conditions conducive to health. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some attributes of an ideal oral health care system on which the United States has made initial strides, it falls far short in many areas. The development of an oral health care delivery system that meets the characteristics described above is possible but would require tremendous commitment and political will on the part of the American public and its elected officials to bring it to fruition.

[Standard dental care for people who are mentally disabled]. / Reguliere mondzorg aan mensen met een verstandelijke beperking.

The Health Insurance Board (CVZ) initiated a study of the functioning of the dental care system for mentally disabled people in the Netherlands.Two independent samples were used for the study, each drawn from a subpopulation of people with a mental disability in the age-group 15-45: people who have always lived at home (n = 60) and people who have been at some time been institutionalized and as a result of decentralization now live outside of the institution (n = 52). Dental visits were in both samples remarkably frequent (95-100%) and relatively few problems with daily dental care were identified. However, the health insurance regulations were unclear to many parents and carers, and there were doubts regarding dentists' specific expertise. At first sight the results of this study do not give cause to assume that there are special barriers to access to professional dental care for adult people with special needs. For a definitive conclusion regarding the long-term effects of the implementation of policies to de-institutionalize disabled people, and their influence on quality of care, a longitudinal evaluation of the oral health status is required.

Delivering preventive oral health services in pediatric primary care: a case study.

Dental disease, the most prevalent chronic disease of childhood, affects children's overall health and ability to succeed. Integrating oral health into routine well-child checkups is an innovative and practical way to prevent dental disease. The Washington Dental Service Foundation is partnering with Group Health Cooperative, a large integrated delivery system, and other providers in Washington State to change the standard of care by incorporating preventive oral health services into primary care for very young children. This paper describes systemic and policy changes for engaging primary care providers in oral health, including provider training, expanding access to dental care, and reimbursement.

Development of effectiveness of care and use of services measures for dental care plans.

OBJECTIVES: Standardized measures to assess clinical aspects of the performance of managed dental care plans are not available. This project sought to develop and evaluate measures for effectiveness of care and use of services that could be calculated using a plan's administrative data. METHODS: Two panels of stake holders representing dental plans, purchasers, and dental providers participated in a modified Delphi process to refine initial sets of effectiveness of care and use of services measures modeled after HEDIS measures for medical care. The refined measures were then pilot tested in two dental health maintenance organizations. RESULTS: The development process resulted in specification of seven effectiveness of care measures assessing disease activity classification, and prevention and outcomes for caries, periodontal disease, and tooth loss. Six use of services measures focusing on prophylaxes, third molar surgery, preventive, restorative, prosthetic, surgical, and endodontic care also were specified. Pilot testing of the measures indicated reasonable reliability and sensitivity, but also demonstrated the need for supervision or auditing of the process. CONCLUSIONS: These standardized measures for dental care plan performance are available for immediate use. However, because the measures depend on diagnostic information (periodontal probing data and diagnoses associated with restorative treatments) in the administrative data set, their adoption will require changes in most plans' data systems and data collection policies.

The relationship between registration and dental health benefit in 8- and 9-year-old children in Cheshire.

The dental treatment needs of 8- and 9-year-old children registered with a GDP for at least 6 months were compared with the dental treatment needs of children from a similar social background who were neither registered nor regularly attending the Community Dental Service. The children were examined by one of the authors without prior knowledge of registration status for evidence of treatment need. Unequivocal treatment need was defined as untreated dental caries in permanent teeth, sepsis associated with deciduous teeth, instanding maxillary incisors, and untreated permanent teeth fractured into dentine; untreated caries in the deciduous teeth was also recorded. Registration status of the children was subsequently obtained from the Dental Practice Board. Sixty-three per cent of the children had been registered with a GDP for at least 6 months at the time of the survey, 6% had been registered for less than 6 months and 31% had never been registered under the new dental contract. Of the children who had been registered for more than 6 months, 18.5% had unequivocal treatment need as against 17.5% in the unregistered group; 40.4% of the registered children had decay in their deciduous teeth, as against 36.5% of the unregistered children. Comparison of the dental treatment needs of registered and unregistered children showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Regular pattern of preventive dental services--a measure of access.

Having a regular pattern of care should be an indicator of access to and periodic use of preventive and health maintenance services. The analyses reported in this study are intended to provide a better understanding of the factors related to having a regular pattern of preventive dental care. The data were collected in 1981 as part of a U.S. household survey, 'A Study of Dental Health Related and Process Outcomes Associated with Prepaid Dental Care', the most comprehensive cross-sectional data base available in dentistry. Descriptive analyses of a constructed variable, representing perceived and realized access and a preventive orientation, indicate that 53% of the population had a regular pattern of preventive care. Those with a regular pattern of care were more likely to be white, younger, have dental insurance, have no cost barriers, have more than 12 years of education, be dentate, have no perceived symptoms, and no fear of pain. Logistic regressions indicated that there was an increased probability of having a regular pattern of preventive care if individuals had no economic access problems, had positive attitudes, had higher income, reported few oral symptoms, and were non-Black. Overall, the descriptive models used suggested that individuals with resources in the form of finances and education, and a sense of self-efficacy as expressed in attitudes toward oral health, had the greatest probability of having a regular pattern of preventive care.